NOTES: Ban san menene siyasar Molyneux ba. Kuma ban sani ba lokacin da ya nemi yin hira da ni shekarun baya. A wancan lokacin, na bincika shi kuma ban sami wani abin da ke nuna ra'ayinsa game da launin fata ba. Kamar yadda zaku iya ji a cikin hirar mu ta ƙasa, munyi magana ne game da tasirin batsa, ba siyasa ba. Na yi ɗaruruwan tambayoyi da kwasfan fayiloli. Ta ya ya zan samo duk ra'ayin gurgu wanda wani mai tambaya zai bayyana (ko kuma wanda mai tambaya zai ce a gaba)?
Tun daga nan, alamar kasuwanci ta keta RealYBOP twitter (gudu ta Yayi Addu'a da Daniyel Burgess), kuma da yawa membobin RealYBOP, sun kasance suna yada kwasfan Molyneux ta kafofin sada zumunta da kuma imel masu zaman kansu, suna ikirarin cewa Molyneux dan fata ne mai kyan gani kuma bayyanar da nake yi a wasan kwaikwayon nasa yana nufin Ni ne wani farin supremacist. Bari mu kasance a sarari sosai: masu hargitsi da masu satar yanar gizo, Nicole Farko da kuma David Ley, su ne suka fara wannan kamfani na da ban tsoro game da ni shekaru da suka gabata. Su ne waɗanda, tare da taimakon abokan aikinsu, suke inganta shi. Abin da Molyneux's ra'ayoyi, ba shakka, ba makawa ne a bayar da shawarar hakan ya ra'ayoyi nawa ne ba tare da wata hujja ba. Shin Joe Rogan yanzu fararen fata ne domin shi a kai a kai Stefan Molyneux ya ci gaba a cikin fayel dinsa?
Ba kamar ni ba, Joe Rogan yana sane da ra'ayoyin Molyneux. Na kasance kawai bako a kan Podcast na Molyneux, a can don tattauna batsa na intanet (kuma ba komai).
Gaskiya: Ni, a zahiri, ni mai yanci ne mai sassaucin ra'ayi da kuma ainihin saɓanin farin zuriya. Na ƙi, kuma na la'anta, irin waɗannan ra'ayoyin. Na yi saurayina ina zaune a wata baƙar fata wacce ba ni da yawa kuma biyu daga cikin dangina suna da aure daga Ba-Amurke. Don lissafi na na gaskiya, saurari wannan hirar: Hotunan batsa da Den Den Denji (Hira da Wilson).
Da yawa daga cikin magoya baya suna mamakin dalilin da yasa ban cire wannan hira ba daga baya na shafin yanar gizo na mai shafi 13,000. Amsar: saboda masu lalata ni Nicole Farko da kuma RealYBOP a kan Twitter yi ƙarya da'awar sau da yawa cewa, "Gary Wilson na ƙoƙarin ɓoye fayel ɗin Molyneux. ”A gaskiya, bana boyewa ko inganta shi ba. Wata Podcast ɗin - daga cikin dama na aikata. Ba ya tattauna siyasa game da launin fata kwata-kwata, kuma ina son masu sauraro su iya jin sa kuma suyi hukunci da gaskiya don kansu.
Lura cewa yiwa mutane lakabi (sannan yunƙurin kafa “laifi ta hanyar tarayya”) wata dabara ce da aka fi so daga waɗanda ba za su iya ɗaukar abin da ya shafi muhawarar batsa ba. Duba wadannan sassan shafin da ke tattara bayanai game da wasu hare-hare da dama da ni da kaina aka yiwa wasu da:
- Ana ci gaba - David Ley & Nicole Prause suna ƙoƙari su ɓata YBOP / Gary Wilson & Nofap / Alexander Rhodes ta hanyar da'awar haɗi tare da masu son Nazi-Nazi
- Oktoba, 2018: Ley & Prause sun kirkiro wata kasida da ke da alaƙa don haɗawa da Gary Wilson, Alexander Rhodes da Gabe Deem ga fararen fata / masu fascists (Yi amfani da hare-hare Rhodes & Nofap a cikin sassan maganganun)
- Yuni, 2019: David Ley da Prause (a matsayin RealYBOP Twitter & "sciencearousal") suna ci gaba da kamfen ɗin su don haɗuwa da tarurruka na dawo da batsa ga fararen fata / Nazis
- Agusta, 2019: Bayan faruwar harbe-harbe biyu (El Paso & Dayton), Nicole Prause & David Ley suna ƙoƙari su haɗa Gary Wilson, YBOP da Nofap / Alexander Rhodes zuwa fararen fata na ƙasa da na Nazi
- Nuwamba, 2018: Yin wasa ya ci gaba da kai hare-hare ba da izini ba, a kan NoFap.com & Alexander Rhodes
Sabunta # 1: Amincewa da cin mutunci da hargitsi a ƙarshe sun riske ta. Kunnawa Bari 8, 2019 Donald Hilton, MD ya gabatar da karar da se kara a kan Nicole Prause & Liberos LLC. A ranar 24 ga Yuli, 2019 Donald Hilton ya gyara karar sa na bata sunan don haskaka (1) mummunan ƙungiyar Texas ta Nazarin Likitocin Likita, (2) zargin karya da Dr. Hilton ya yi na ba da shaidar sa, kuma (3) ya ba da tabbaci daga 9 sauran Prause waɗanda aka azabtar da irin wannan zalunci (John Adler, MD, Gary Wilson, Alexander Rhodes, Staci Sprout, LICSW, Linda Hatch, PhD, Bradley Green, PhD, Stefanie Carnes, PhD, Geoff Goodman, PhD, Laila Haddad.) A kunne Oktoba 23, 2019 Alexander Rhodes (wanda ya kafa reddit / nofap da kuma NoFap.com) yi kara a karar da aka gurfanar da Nicole R Prause da Liberos LLC. Duba kotu a nan.
Sabunta # 2 (Nuwamba, 2019): A ƙarshe, wasu madaidaitan ɗaukar hoto: "Alex Rhodes na ictionungiyar Taimakon Batsa ictionwararriyar 'NoFap' ya Obsunshi Lafiyar Farfesa na Farfesa don lalata kai" na Megan Fox na PJ Media da kuma "Yaƙe-yaken batsa sun zama na mutum a cikin Nuwamba Nuwamba", na Diana Davison na Millennika na Post. Davison ya kuma samar da wannan bidiyon na mintuna na 6 game da halayen rashin ladabi na Prause: "Shin batsa mai jaraba ne?"
Wani yanki daga Megan Fox wanda yake da alaƙa da Prauseirƙirar kirkirar da ni, Alex, da duk wanda ke ba da shawarar batsa na iya haifar da matsala, mai farin jini ne:
Wataƙila mafi kyawun halayen Prause a cikin wannan saga ita ce tuhumar da Rhodes ɗan Nazi da fari-supremacist, kamar yadda aka bayyana dalla-dalla a cikin ƙarar. Wannan bai kamata ya ba kowa mamaki ba wanda ya kasance yana mai da hankali tun 2016. Mintar da SJW bata yarda da wani ba, wannan mutumin ya zama ɗan Nazi. Laifin Rhodes? Ya kyale mai sharhi kan siyasa Gavin McInnes ya yi masa tambayoyi yayin da yake kan aiki mataimakin. Kuma tun lokacin da Prause ta gano cewa Rhodes ya yi magana da McInnes lokaci guda kuma bai zubar da abin sha a fuskarsa ba, tana zargin sa da goyon bayan Proud Boys (wanda ya sami matsala da yawa saboda yawon shakatawa da Antifa). Har yanzu dai lokaci ne, a ganina, in kira Proud Boys wani abu sai dai kungiyar masu shan giya, amma Rhodes a zahiri ya dauki kungiyar 'Proud Boys' a matsayin kungiyar 'yan ta'adda. Bai taɓa zama memba ba, kuma ba mai tallafawa ba. Babu Fap da ya taɓa kasancewa siyasa kuma ya sadaukar da kai don ba da taimako ga jaraba ga duk wanda yake buƙata. Wannan bai hana Prause ci gaba da danganta shi da “fararen fata ba” ta hanyar rauni mara karfi na tattaunawa daya da McInnes, wanda ba farar fata bane.
Laifin ya zama mai ban sha'awa don kallo yayin da yake buɗe maganganun a kan Twitter don bincika doka. Shin za a riƙe Prause da alhakin buga da'awar karya a kafofin watsa labarun?
Diana Davison, wanda ya yi rubutu Millennika na Post bijirar 'kan Nicole Prause, shi ma ya samar da wannan Bidiyo na minti 90-6 game da makarar karya ta Prause da kuma karar da aka gurbata akan Prause. Da ke ƙasa akwai maganganun bayyanannun abubuwa a ƙarƙashin tshi Diana Davison bidiyon (a cikin martani ga wani mai yawan sharhi da kuma mai son Prause):
-----------
-----------
An fallasa addu'ar a zaman zamba. Mafi yawan abubuwa anan: Nicole Prause & David Ley sun yi ƙarya a shari'ar ɓatanci (Satumba, 2019).
Sabuntawa # 3 (Agusta, 2020): Hukuncin kotu sun fallasa Nicole Prause a matsayin mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka azabtar ba. A watan Maris na 2020, Prause ta nemi umarni na hana wucin gadi na wucin gadi (TRO) akan ni ta amfani da “shaida” da aka kirkira da kuma karyar da ta saba (karyata zargina da neman). A cikin bukatar da Prause ta yi na hana ta ta yi wa kanta lahani, tana cewa na sanya adireshinta a kan YBOP da Twitter (ɓarna ba wani sabon abu bane da Salisu). Na shigar da karar anti-SLAPP a kan Prause don rashin amfani da tsarin shari'a (TRO) don yin shiru da damun ni. A ranar 6 ga watan Agusta, Babbar Kotun Kwalejin ta Los Angeles ta yanke hukuncin cewa yunƙurin Prause na samun umarnin hana ni ya zama wani mummunan abu kuma wanda ba shi da doka “a shari'ar dabaru game da halartar jama'a" (galibi ana kiranta da "SLAPP kwat"). Amincewa yayi ƙarya a cikin yaudarar ta TRO, yana bayarwa sifilin tabbataccen shaida don tallafa mata da'awar waje cewa na tsane ta ko na takura mata. A takaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta wulakanta tsarin takunkumin don tursasa ni yin shiru kuma ta danne hakkinsa na fadin albarkacin baki. A doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wajan biyan kuɗin lauya na.
;