Cin nasarar doka akan mai cin mutunci / ɓatanci Nicole Prause: Ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka azabtar ba!

shari'a

Wannan shafin don 'yan jarida da sauran masu binciken da suka iya karanta maganganun da Dokta Prause shine wanda aka azabtar.

NOTE: Marigayi Gary Wilson ne ya rubuta wannan shafin. Koyaya, ƙungiyar YBOP ta sabunta shi kaɗan. Don haka salo da murya ba daidai ba ne a wurare.

Da'awar kawai, komai fayyace ko nawa abokanan mutum amsa kuwwa, ba hujja bane. Shaida ta gaskiya ta dogara ne akan gaskiyar da za'a iya tabbatar da ita. Mafi yawa "Shaida" da aka buga a kan kafofin watsa labarun ba za a yarda da shi a cikin shari'ar shari'a ba saboda ana jin-ce, ba shi da muhimmanci, yana karewa, ko kuma ba shi da tushe.

A cikin yanayin da gaskiyar lamari, da'awar Dr. Prause ba ta yi kyau ba. Wannan shafin yana tattara wasu nasarorin doka akan Nicole Prause. Abin da ke aiki a kan magoya bayanta na Twitter da abokan aikin batsa ba ya yanke shi a kotu.

A cikin 2013, tsohon masanin kimiyya Dokta Prause ya fara tsoratarwa a fili, lalata da yin magana game da yanar gizo Gary Wilson (don kushe kuskuren binciken EEG nata). A cikin kankanin lokaci ita ma ta fara niyyar wasu, da suka hada da masu bincike, likitocin kiwon lafiya, masu ilimin kwantar da hankali, masana halayyar dan adam, tsohon abokin aikin UCLA, kungiyar ba da agaji ta Burtaniya, maza a murmurewa, a TIME editan mujallar, furofesoshi da yawa, IITAP, SASH, Fight The New Drug, Fitowa Fitowa, TraffickingHub, NoFap.com, Sake yiNation, YourBrainRebalanced, da ilimi mujallar Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, iyayensa MDPI, US likitoci na likitoci, shugaban jaridar kimiyya CUREUS, da mujallar Yin jima'i da jima'i da jima'i. Don magance rikice-rikicen rikice-rikice da da'awar ƙarya, YBOP an tilasta shi ya rubuta wasu ayyukan Dokta Prause a kan waɗannan shafuka masu yawa: Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5, Page 6.

Yayinda yake damun wasu da bata sunan wasu, Dr.Prause ya kasance da wayo - tare da sifilin tabbataccen shaida - tatsuniya cewa ita ce "Wanda aka azabtar" na mafi yawan duk wanda ya kuskura ya saba da maganganunta game da tasirin batsa ko halin yanzu na binciken batsa. (Duba: Abubuwan da Nicole Prause ta kirkira game da abin da aka azabtar da su sun kasance marasa tushe.) Dangane da dambarwarta ta shari'a da asara, ikirarin da take na kirkirar mutane ya karu matuka. Shin tana ƙoƙari ne ya juyar da hankali daga tsangwama da bata mata suna da take yi da take yi?

Shin ƙarin shari'ar da aka rasa a cikin gabatarwa don Gudanarwa? Uku daga cikin wadanda abin ya rutsa da su sun shigar da karar bata suna saboda ta yi kokarin rusa ayyukansu kuma ta lalata mutuncinsu (Harin da aka kai wa duka 3 ya ci gaba ba tare da tsayawa ba):

  1. Donald L. Hilton, Jr. v. Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gunduma ta Amurka na Yankin Yammacin Texas San Antonio Division, Shari'a Mai lamba 5: 19-CV-00755-OLG
  2. Alexander Rhodes da Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gunduma ta Amurka don Yammacin Gundumar Pennsylvania, Shari'a Mai lamba 2: 19-cv-01366
  3. Aaron M. Minc, Esq v. Melissa A. Farmer da Nicole R. Prause, Lamarin Babu: CV-20-937026 a Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

Me ya sa wasu da dama da ake zargin Prause ba su kai ƙararta ba? Komai girman tuhumar karya, karar batanci ba magani bane mai amfani saboda kudade na shari'a na iya gudanar da dubunnan daloli ga wadanda abin ya shafa har yanzu ba su da dala sifili. Wannan shi ne saboda, ya zuwa yanzu, kamfanin inshora nata mara sa'a yakan rufe kudaden tsaro a irin wannan kara. Wannan shine dalilin da ya sa Prause da rashin kunya ya ci gaba da bata sunan Wilson (har ma bayan mutuwarsa) da wasu da yawa (ciki har da biyun da suka shigar da karar batanci a kanta, Don Hilton da kuma Alex Rhodes ne adam wata). Ba sai ta biya ko kwabo ba alhalin jinin da abin ya shafa ya bushe. Ko da lokacin da masu gabatar da kara suka yi nasara, tattara diyya da kuɗaɗen lauya yana da matsala. Hasali ma, ko da sakamakon da ya samu ya yi wa wanda aka bata suna, wasu lokuta ana ci gaba da kai hare-hare ba tare da wani hukunci ba, kuma wanda ake kai wa hari yana da iyakacin magunguna don aiwatar da hukuncin da ya dace. Lauyoyi ne kawai ke fitowa gaba da irin wannan kara.

Duk da haka, wasu hare-haren nata sun jawo matakin shari'a (da kuma kashe daruruwan dubban daloli a cikin sa'o'i na lauya). Waɗannan shari'o'in sun sami tabbataccen sakamako - mara kyau ga Prause. Ba na zamani bane, saboda an sabunta wannan shafin tun mutuwar Wilson.


1) Gary Wilson (Kwakwalwar ku akan batsa) ya sami Nasara kan Doka ta Biyu Akan Akidar 'Yan Luwadi Nicole Prause

Mai binciken batsa 'yar gwagwarmaya tana bin bashi da kudin kotu bayan karar da ta yi na bata suna ta gaza

ASHLAND, OREGON: Janairu 28, 2021: Marubucin da ya fi siyarwa kuma mai ba da shawara kan kiwon lafiyar jama'a Gary Wilson ya sake cin wata nasarar shari'a a kan masanin ilimin jima'i da murya mai ba da shawara game da masana'antar batsa Nicole Prause.

A shekarar da ta gabata, Prause ta nemi umarnin hana izini game da Wilson a California. The Kotu tayi watsi da shi kuma ta amince da bukatar Wilson na adawa da SLAPP, barin Prause ya wajaba ya biya kuɗin lauyan sa.

Yi aiki ya gabatar da karo na biyu na rashin gaskiya game da Wilson a cikin Disamba, 2020 don zargin ɓatanci. A wani sauraro a ranar 22 ga Janairu, 2021 wata kotun Oregon ta yanke hukunci a gaban Wilson kuma ta tuhumi Yin amfani da farashi da ƙarin hukunci.

A cikin watanni 18 da suka gabata Yi aiki ya yi barazanar a fili (ko gabatar da shi) shari'o'in dozin da nufin zaluntar wasu zuwa shiru. Tana kai hari ga wadanda suka bayyana a bainar jama'a dankon zumunci da masana'antar batsa da kuma mummunar ɗabi'arta, ko waɗanda suka gabatar da jawabai a cikin kararraki 3 na ɓata suna a halin yanzu da ke aiki a kanta.*

Sabuwar nasarar shari'a ta Wilson ta zo ne a kan dugadugan da Prause ta yi na baƙincikin yunƙuri don a binciki gidan yanar gizon Wilson tare da taimakon abokin aiki kwararru kan lafiyar kwakwalwa. Yakin nata na kiyayya ya fara kusan shekaru 2 da suka gabata lokacin da An yi amfani da aikace-aikacen don alamun kasuwanci mai kyau, gami da keɓaɓɓen haƙƙin doka don sarrafa Wilson ainihin URL ("YourBrainOnPorn.com"). Alamar kasuwanci kwace gaza, kuma an yi alamun a cikin sunan Wilson a cikin 2020.

A halin yanzu, a watan Maris na 2019, ƙungiyar haɗin gwiwar Prause Daniel A. Burgess rajista da alamar kasuwanci-infringing domain name "RealYourBrainOnPorn.com, ”Wanda ya tsunduma cikin yaudara daban-daban don karkatar da zirga-zirgar YourBrainOnPorn.com zuwa gidan yanar gizo mai yaudara. Bayan awowi da yawa na lauya, a cikin Janairu, 2021 Wilson ya sami sunan yankin RealYourBrainOnPorn.com a matsayin sasantawa game da zargin cin zarafin kasuwanci. Tun da farko, a cikin Oktoba, 2020, haɗin yanar gizon haɗin gizon Twitter @BrainOnPorn ya kasance har abada don tsangwama.

Bayan nasarar da ya yi a kotu ta karshe Wilson ya ce, "Na yi mamakin yadda ake kirga zagin da ake yi wa mutanen da suka kuskura su yi magana a bainar jama'a game da illolin batsa." Ya kara da cewa, “mugayen dabarun takunkumi na masana'antar batsa da kawayenta na jima'i sun dakile mahawara ta kimiyya da jama'a. Kamar dai yadda Babban Taba ya taba yi, suna dauke hankalin jama'a daga rubutattun kasada na cutar batsa ga duka masu amfani da wadanda take amfani da su. ”

Wilson ya dauki bakuncin www.YourBrainOnPorn.com, gidan share fage don sabon bincike, kafofin watsa labarai, da rahotanni kai tsaye kan illolin batsa da illolinsu. Wasu shekarun da suka gabata, ya gabatar da immensely sanannen TEDx magana "Babban Gwajin Batsa" (~ ra'ayoyi miliyan 14). Wilson ya daɗe yana yin zargi game da binciken da aka wallafa da maganganun jama'a game da amfani da batsa. Shima marubucin Amazon mafi kyawun mai sayarwa Your Brain On Porn: Intanit Pornography da kuma Kimiyya Kimiyya na Addiction. Akwai shi a ciki harsuna da yawa, kuma an riga an yaba ɗayan bugu a matsayin ɗayan manyan littattafan da ba na almara ba a cikin shekaru goman da suka gabata.

* Donald L. Hilton, Jr. v. Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gunduma ta Amurka na Yankin Yammacin Texas San Antonio Division, Shari'a Mai lamba 5: 19-CV-00755-OLG; Alexander Rhodes da Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gunduma ta Amurka don Yammacin Gundumar Pennsylvania, Shari'a Mai lamba 2: 19-cv-01366, da Aaron M. Minc, Esq v. Melissa A. Farmer da Nicole R. Prause, Lamarin Babu: CV-20-937026 a Cuyahoga County, Ohio. A kowane yanayi, maza da mata da yawa sun fito tare da maganganun rantsuwa cewa Yin amfani da shi ya kuma yi niyya akan su: sanarwa # 1, sanarwa # 2sanarwa # 3sanarwa # 4sanarwa # 5sanarwa # 6sanarwa # 7sanarwa # 8sanarwa # 9sanarwa # 10sanarwa # 11sanarwa # 12, sanarwa # 13, sanarwa # 14, sanarwa # 15, sanarwa # 16.

UMARNIN KOTU

Bayanin Gary Wilson

A ƙasa akwai sanarwar da Wilson ya bayar ga kotu (ya kuma bayar da sama da shafuka 100 na kayan tallafi).

Ni, Gary Wilson, na faɗi kuma na faɗi kamar haka:

Wannan shari'ar ita ce karo na biyu da mai shigar da karar ya shigar a kaina. Na farko an yanke shawarar ne a cikin ni'ima biyo bayan sauraron karar da aka yi a ranar 6 ga Agusta, 2020 daga Babban Kotun California (Yi amfani da v. Wilson Shari'a Mai lamba 20TRO01022). Alkalin ya amince da bukatar da na nuna na adawa da SLAPP tare da yin watsi da karar da mai shigar da kara ya shigar a kaina. Ya yanke hukuncin cewa tayi kuskuren yunƙurin dakatar da haƙƙina na yin magana akan wani abu da ya shafi jama'a kuma ya bayyana cewa shari'ar ta ba ta da wata ƙima.

Mako guda kafin wannan sauraren karar, Lauyan mai shigar da kara ya yi yunkurin yin murabus daga kararta saboda mai shigar da karar ta yi masa barazanar shigar da kara sai dai idan ya yi wani abu da lauyanta yake ganin cewa "ba shi da garambawul a karkashin dokar da ke akwai kuma [wanda] ba za a iya tallafawa da kyakkyawar hujja ba. (Daga Sanarwar Brett A. Berman, Esq., A ranar 31 ga Yulin, 2020.) Daga roƙe-roƙenta na farko ya bayyana cewa tana neman ya gabatar da ɗimbin shaidun da ba za a yarda da su ba. Alkalin ya ki karbar murabus din lauyanta. Kari akan haka, a zaman da aka saurara kwanaki kadan, alkalin ya yanke hukuncin mafi yawan rantsuwar da mai shigar da kara ya zama ba za a amince da shi ba kamar jin karar, bashi da mahimmanci, kammalawa, da dai sauransu.

Mai gabatar da kara kuma shi ne wanda ake kara a kararraki 3 na bata suna da ke gaban Kotunan Gundumar Tarayyar Amurka: Donald L. Hilton Jr v. Nicole Prause da Liberos LLC, Lamarin Babu: SA: 19-CV-00755-OLG; Alexander Rhodes v. Nicole Prause da Liberos LLC, Shari'a Mai lamba 2: 19-CV-01366-MPK; kuma Aaron M. Minc, Esq v. Melissa A. Farmer da Nicole R. Prause, Lamarin Babu: CV-20-937026. A kararraki biyu na farko, maza da mata da yawa, har da ni kaina, sun gabatar da jawabai na rantsuwa cewa mai shigar da kara shi ma ya auna su.

Mai shigar da kara yana da tarihi mai yawa na tsunduma cikin mummunan amfani da tsari da kuma gabatar da korafe-korafen gudanarwa marasa tushe game da manufa da yawa. A cikin fewan shekarun da suka gabata, Mai shigar da kara ya gabatar da korafi da rahotanni fiye da 40 tare da kwamitocin ƙwararru, masu tilasta doka, masu ba da aiki, da kuma hukumomin sa ido / kotuna (aƙalla aƙalla mutane 28 da kungiyoyi daban-daban). Babu shakka akwai ƙarin irin waɗannan korafe-korafen / rahotanni, kamar yadda wasu alƙalai da hukumomi ba sa bayyana asalin waɗanda suka fallasa bayanan. Misali, na yi imanin cewa ita ma tana bayan wani korafi a kaina da aka shigar da ita ga Hukumar Kula da Ilimin halin dan Adam na Oregon (don yin ilimin halin dan Adam ba tare da lasisi ba). Na sami labarin ne kawai bayan an watsar da shi a taƙaice. Ban taɓa bayyana kaina a matsayin masanin ilimin halin ɗan adam ba, ko kuma kamar wani abu ba sai marubuci, tsohon masanin jikin mutum, malamin koyar da ilimin lissafi a makarantun koyon sana'a, kuma tsohon malamin koyarwa a Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon.

A shekarar da ta gabata ko makamancin haka Mai shigar da kara ya gabatar da aƙalla ƙararraki huɗu na ƙararraki (ban da buƙatar hana doka mara izini), kuma ya yi barazanar da yawa. Mai shigar da kara yakan gabatar da rahotonta na sharri da kuma mummunan amfani da tsari ga mu wadanda suka gabatar da jawabai a cikin shari'ar batanci da ke sama. Shin tana ƙoƙarin tsoratar da mu ne a matsayin shaidu?

A shekarar da ta gabata, Mai shigar da kara ya shigar da takaddar alamar kasuwanci ta USPTO don alamun kasuwanci na gama gari da aka kafa, gami da aikace-aikace don ainihin URL na gidan yanar gizo na shekaru goma. Wannan ya buƙaci watanni da ɗaruruwan awowi na lokacin lauya don yin rajista da kare alamun kasuwanci na, da kuma dakatar da haramtacciyar alamar kasuwanci da ƙeta da ita da abokan aikinta suka bi ta wucin gadi. Har ila yau, ta yi barazanar kuma ta ɓatar da yanar gizo na ƙoƙari (ba tare da nasara ba) don rufe shafin yanar gizon na, tare da sauran ayyukan ƙiyayya da yawa don lissafa a nan.

Tarihi

Mai shigar da kara, tsohon malami ne, mai bincike ne kuma mai sharhi kan al'amuran da suka shafi jima'i, gami da da'awar amfani da batsa. Ni marubuci ne, mai ba da shawara, kuma mai sharhi na jama'a wanda aikinsa ke mayar da hankali kan mummunan tasirin lafiyar jiki da ƙwaƙwalwa na amfani da batsa na dijital. Na dauki bakuncin wani shahararren gidan yanar gizo da ake kira YourBrainOnPorn.com. Littafin da aka fi sani da sayarwa a cikin littafin karatun batsa shine littafina Your Brain On Porn: Intanit Pornography da kuma Kimiyya Kimiyya na Addiction. An riga an fassara shi zuwa wasu harsuna bakwai. Maganina na TEDx mai shaidar "Gwajin Tsohon Batsa" an kalle shi sama da sau miliyan 13.

Ra'ayoyin mai gabatar da kara da ra'ayina game da amfani da batsa da tasirinsa sau da yawa ya bambanta. Ba na “kyamar” binciken nata, amma na fito karara na soki wasu takardu na mai shigar da kara da wasu bayanan da ta yi a bainar jama’a game da abin da ta yanke. Mai shigar da kara ya nuna yana jin daɗin masana'antar batsa. Na faɗi hakan ne dangane da yadda jama'a suka yarda da ita ta hanyar yanar gizo na karɓar taimako daga ɓangaren farko na neman masaniya a masana'antar, hotunan halartar taron da take yi, da irin goyon bayan da take da shi na abubuwan da masana'antar ke so a shafukan sada zumunta, da kuma kai hare-hare da ɓatanci a kafofin sada zumunta, da kuma ta hanyar munanan rahotanni, duk wanda ya wayar da kan mutane game da illolin da ke tattare da amfani da batsa ta yanar gizo.

Tun daga 2013 har zuwa yau, Mai shigar da kara ya yi ta maimaita maganganun ƙarya, na jama'a, na ɓatanci game da ni a cikin manema labarai da kuma ta hanyar kafofin watsa labarai. Mai shigar da kara ya fadi karya kuma ya fito karara, a tsakanin wasu maganganun batanci, cewa ni “mai bin diddigin” mata ne; cewa nayi “barazanar kisa” a kanta kuma na karfafa wasu suyi haka; cewa na tsunduma cikin haramtacciyar hanyar komputa; cewa nayi kuskuren gabatar da takardun shaida na; cewa na tsunduma cikin yaudara; cewa ni farar fata ne kuma memba na kungiyoyin kiyayya; da kuma cewa na yiwa masana kimiyya barazana.

Mai gabatar da kara ya yi irin wadannan maganganun batanci game da wasu da dama wadanda ke raba ra'ayina game da illolin da ke tattare da amfani da hotunan batsa. Kamar yadda aka lura, da yawa daga cikinsu sun riga sun gurfanar da ita, a wani ɓangare saboda tana ci gaba da bayyanawa ga jama'a, maganganun ɓatanci duk da shari'o'in ɓatanci da ake yi.

Anti-SLAPP

Manufar gabatar da kudiri na musamman don yajin aiki a cikin ORS § 31.150 ita ce kawar da ikirarin da ba su dace ba da nufin tursasawa ko tsoratarwa don hana yin amfani da 'yancin fadin albarkacin baki na tsarin mulki. Kotuna suna amfani da shi sosai ga duk maganganun da aka gabatar "a wani wuri da aka buɗe wa jama'a ko wani taron jama'a dangane da kowane batun da ya shafi jama'a," wanda ya samo asali daga: (1) kowane hali; (2) a ci gaba da aiwatar da 'yancin faɗar albarkacin baki na tsarin mulki na' yancin faɗar albarkacin baki; da (3) dangane da batun jama'a ko batun maslahar jama'a. "Batun jama'a" da "batun maslahar jama'a" an fassara su da kansu. Wani bincike na kan layi ya nuna cewa kananan kotunan da'awa a duk fadin kasar sun ba da izinin adawa da SLAPP lokacin da ya dace.

Wannan karar ta samo asali ne daga maganata mai kariya dangane da batun maslaha ta jama'a: illolin amfani da hotunan batsa na dijital da ikirarin da ayyukan masu binciken batsa / masu magana da yawun batsa, gami da Mai shigar da kara. Masana masu bincike a wannan fagen, banda wadanda suka hada kai da mai shigar da kara, galibi suna bayyana ra'ayoyi irin nawa.

Gidan yanar gizon ku na YourBrainOnPorn.com yana karɓar kimanin baƙi na musamman 15,000 kowace rana. Wuri ne na share fagen bincike kan tasirin batsa da sauran abubuwan sha'awa ga maziyarta. Percentageananan kaso na shafuka na 12,000 + na rukunin yanar gizo an sadaukar dasu don yin sharhi akan binciken masana kimiyya daban-daban da bayanan latsawa. Wasu daga cikin sharhin na sukar hanya da iƙirarin da aka yi; wasu daga cikinsu suna magana ne game da nuna son kai da kuma halin shakku na masu bincike / masu magana da yawun; kuma wasu daga cikinsu suna rubuce-rubucen ayyukan mai shigar da kara da munanan abubuwa da mai shigar da kara da sauransu suka samar.

A bayyane yake daga yawan sha'awar yanar gizo, littafi da TEDx magana, cewa jama'a suna sha'awar batun tasirin batsa da aiki / halayyar masu bincike a wannan fagen. Don haka, na yi imani da gwajin “maslaha ta jama’a” na ORS § 31.150 an sadu.

A cewar dokar Oregon da ke adawa da SLAPP, da zarar an yi gwajin "amfanin jama'a" kotu za ta ba da izinin yin zanga-zangar sai dai idan mai gabatar da kara na iya gabatar da kwararan hujjojin yiwuwar samun nasara a kan da'awar. ORS § 31.150 (3). Mai shigar da kara ba zai iya nuna yuwuwar rinjaya a kan ikirarin nata ba.

A karar da ta shigar gabanta a karar da aka shigar gabanta wanda ya shigar da karar wanda ya shigar da karar wanda ya shigar da karar wanda ya shigar da karar ya shigar da karar. A wannan karar ta zayyano dalilan daukar matakai da yawa, amma hujja daya tak da take bayarwa ita ce maganganu, da ake zargin na rubuta, wanda a fili take ganin bata suna ne.. Lallai nayi dukkan bayanan banda na karshe. Na karshe wanda 'yar jarida Megan Fox ta yi a wata kasida mai taken, "' Babu Fap 'Taron Addungiyar Taimako Game da Batsa Pornungiyoyin da Suke Kula da Pro-Porn Sexologist for Defamation." (Mai gabatar da kara shine masanin ilimin jima'i da aka ambata a cikin taken.)

Mai shigar da kara wani fitaccen mutum ne wanda ya yi fice a shafukan sada zumunta da labarai, wanda ke nufin ana iya sa ran wasu su yi magana game da ita da ayyukanta. Bayanin da mai shigar da kara ya yi zargin na yi bai kai matakin batanci ga kowa ba, balle wani mai jama'a. Kodayake ba dukansu ne na yi su ba, wadanda na yi sun bayyana a bayyane ra'ayoyi na imani na gari da kuma lura game da abubuwan da mai shigar da kara yake son yi, ta fallasa munanan halayenta, ko kuma na kare kaina da wasu a fili game da ikirarin mara tushe. Bayanin nawa ya zama magana mai kariya dangane da al'amuran da suka shafi jama'a.

Duk maganganun na sun dogara ne da bayanan da ake samu a fili ko kuma halin da na lura da kaina a cikin dubban masu shigar da kara a kafofin watsa labarai ko kuma a cikin rantsuwar da ta yi a cikin shari'ar. A yayin yin tsokaci kan ayyukan Mai gabatar da kara da aikinta ban taɓa mamaye sirrinta ba, tsoma baki cikin kasuwancinta, ko kuma da sani na ba da gudummawa wajen rasa duk wata kwangilar bincike. Ban taba yi mata barazana ko karfafa wasu don su yi mata barazana ba, kuma ban taba sanya bayanan sirrinta ko wani abu da zai sanya lafiyarta cikin hadari ba.

Mai shigar da kara yana nuna cewa maganganun da nake zargi duk an yi su kwanan nan, amma duk bayanan da na yi, kamar irin abubuwan da na ambata a baya, an fara bayyana su ne kafin watanni 12 da suka gabata. Dole ne a yi da'awar ɓatanci a cikin shekara guda. (ORS § 12.120)

Saboda duk dalilan da ke sama, babu yiwuwar mai gabatar da kara ya yi nasara a wannan aikin.

A ƙarshe, korafin mai shigar da kara wani yunƙuri ne na bayyane don rufe ni ta hanyar rashin bin doka da kuma haƙƙin haƙƙin haƙƙin faɗar albarkacin baki. Ina girmama cikin girmamawa ina neman kotu ta lura da karar da aka shigar na nuna adawa da SLAPP a kwanan nan da Babbar Kotun California ta bayar bisa la’akari da irin karar da mai shigar da kara ya gabatar, kuma ta ba da bukata ta ta yin hakan bisa ga ORS § 31.150 gami da kudin kotu na.

Ina bayyanawa a karkashin azabar rantsuwa akan dokokin jihar Oregon cewa abin da muka ambata gaskiyane kuma daidai ne na kaina sani. An zartar da wannan 15th ranar Disamba 2020 a Ashland, Oregon.

Gary Wilson


2) YBOP ta sayi www.RealYourBrainOnPorn.com a cikin yarjejeniyar cin amanar kasuwanci (Janairu 2021)

The www.RealYourBrainOnPorn.com An ba YBOP URL bayan tsohon mai ita, a bayyane tare da haɗin gwiwa Nicole R. Gwadawa, rajista da kuma adana URL a matsayin wani ɓangare na kamfen don sake tsarin YBOP.

Musamman, Gary Wilson ya sami RealYourBrainOnPorn.com (RealYBOP) sunan yanki azaman sasanta zarge-zargen keta doka akan alamun kasuwanci. Sauran na wannan page takaddun yaƙin neman zaɓe na Fuskanci da ƙawayenta, wanda ya fara da ƙoƙari na sake fasalin YBOP, sannan ƙoƙarin ƙoƙari ya rikitar da baƙi, kuma a ƙarshe ya yi amfani da alamun kasuwanci na YBOP don ɓata shi. (Cikakken Labari)

Duk da yake Daniel A. Burgess rajista www.RealYourBrainOnPorn.com, Prause's yawancin wadanda aka cutar yi imani da ta orchestrated da abun ciki akan RealYBOP kuma yayi amfani da asusunsa na kafofin sada zumunta. Yin aiki zai iya musun sa hannu, amma kallo mai sauƙi, wasikun masana na RealYBOP, rahoton WIPO, da kuma manyan shaidu sun nuna yadda take gudanar da asusun kafofin watsa labarai da realyourbrainonporn.com (shaida nan).

Haka kuma an yi amfani da shafin na RealYBOP don kirkirar wani shafin Twitter mai hade da suna "Real Your Brain On Porn" (BrainOnPorn). Nasa kocin (mai yiwuwa Yi amfani) a fili ya nace cewa asusun Twitter ya nuna ra'ayoyin duk “masana” a cikin layi-layi akan gidan yanar gizon RealYBOP da aka rufe yanzu.

Yin aikin ta da ake tsammani “gama gari”, shafin twitter na @BrainOnPorn tweeted fiye da kalaman batanci da sharri game da duk wanda Nicole Prause ba ta yarda da shi ba (watau, duk wanda ya yi ƙoƙari ya magance labarin da aka fi so game da masana'antar jima'i / batsa). A watan Oktoba, 2020 asusun an dakatar dashi dindindin don keta dokokin Twitter (An dakatar da asusun Twitter na asali na har abada don musgunawa). Don ƙarin ƙarin duba waɗannan shafuka masu faɗi:


3) Gary Wilson (daBrainka a kan Porn) Ya Samu Nasara ta Shari’a Ga Masanin Sexologist Nicole Prause kokarin da yayi na shi

Deniedoƙarin hanawa mai bincike na batsa magana mai karyatawa ya zama mai ƙage; Dole ne ya biya kuɗaɗen lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP.

ASHLAND, OREGON: Agusta 16, 2020: Marubucin da ya fi siyarwa kuma mai ba da shawara kan kiwon lafiyar jama'a Gary Wilson ya sami nasarar shari'a a kan mai binciken ilimin jima'i da mai ba da labarin batsa Nicole Prause. A ranar 6 ga watan Agusta, Babban Kotun Kananan Hukumomi na Los Angeles ya yanke hukuncin cewa yunƙurin Prause don samun umarnin hana a kan Wilson ya haifar da “mummunan shari’a game da shigar jama'a” (wanda ake kira “shari’ar SLAPP”). A taƙaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta wulakanta tsarin hana aiwatarwa don tursasa Wilson yin shiru kuma ta tauye haƙƙinsa na faɗin albarkacin baki. A doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wajan biyan kuɗin lauyan Wilson.

Wilson marubuci ne mafi kyawun littafin sayarwa Your Brain On Porn: Intanit Pornography da kuma Kimiyya Kimiyya na Addiction, mai gabatar da shahararren magana game da TEDxGwajin Tsohon Porn, ”(13+ miliyan views) da kuma rundunar na yanar gizo www.YourBrainOnPorn.com, hanyar share fage don sabon bincike, kafofin watsa labarai, da rahotannin kai game da illolin batsa da cutarwa. Wilson ya daɗe ya yi biris da binciken bincike da aka buga Prause da bayanan jama'a game da amfani da batsa.

"Abin mamaki ne cewa masana'antar batsa suna lulluɓe kansu cikin kariya ta Kwaskwarimar Farko yayin da masu gabatar da batsa kamar Nicole Prause suke ƙoƙari su iyakance da yin shiru game da maganganun da ke rubuce game da cutar batsa ga masu amfani da ita da kuma jama'a., ”In ji Wilson bayan hukuncin Kotu. "Wannan wata muhimmiyar nasara ce a kan ɓarna da zalunci da aka samu ta hanyar masu ba da shawarwari waɗanda ke yin magana a bainar jama'a game da illolin batsa. "

Kokarin hanata ya yi har ila yau, yunƙurin bata sunan Wilson a matsayin mai ba da shaida a cikin cin mutuncin mutane 3 da wasu suka shigar a kan Prause. Ya kasa, kuma yanzu ya kara bata mata suna, yana nuna mata karya na tsawon shekaru cewa Wilson yana "take" ta.

Yana da mahimmanci a lura da alkalin farko ya ƙaryata Yi amfani da umarnin hana aiki na ɗan lokaci a cikin Fabrairu, 2020, lokacin da ta shigar da shi ba tare da sanarwa a gare ni ba. Wannan alama ce mai ƙarfi a gare ta cewa tana da rauni. Karyatawa game da TRO yana nufin cewa Prause dole ne ya sanar da ni game da umarnin hanawa, kuma an saita shi don sauraren farko (wanda ya haifar da ji na biyu, kamar yadda Prause ba ta yi mini hidimar daidai ba).

A cikin watanni 3 masu zuwa, Prause zai iya yin watsi da umarnin hanawa na yaudara ba tare da wani sakamako a kanta ba, kuma Wilson zai kasance yana makale da kuɗaɗen lauyan sa ba tare da ɓata lokaci ba. A cikin watan Yuni, wani bangare don gujewa kasancewa a gaban Prause a sauraron karar da aka shirya yi a watan Yuli, da kuma wani bangare na martanin rashin adalci da ake zarginta da yi mata barazanar danne muryarsa, ya shigar da karar. anti-SLAPP motsi don dakatar da umarnin hana. A lokacin, gaba kawai zata iya. Takardun kotu da aka shigar a cikin kudirinsa na adawa da SLAPP:

Wilson ya shigar da karar sa a wani bangare saboda Prause yana da fara marin karar kananan kararraki mara izini da kotu ta shigar a kan mutane, wanda ke buƙatar waɗanda ake tuhuma a kai su CA. Yana da tabbacin za ta yi masa hidima da ɗaya daga cikin ƙaramar ƙaramar ƙararrakin ƙararrakinta idan ya je CA don ba da shaida don sauraron odar.

Kamar yadda ya fito, alkali ya haɗu da batutuwan biyu, kuma duka Prause da Wilson sun sami damar shiga nesa (saboda Covid 19). Wannan ya kare Wilson daga zuwa ko'ina kusa da ita, don jin daɗinsa. Watakila a bayyane yake cewa, da nisa da yi mata barazana, ya kauce ma gabanta. Ranar 5 ga Agusta, karar da kotu ta shigar na mayar da martani ga sanarwar Prause ta Yuli 29:

Jim kadan gabanin sauraron karar a ranar 6 ga watan Agusta, lauyan nata ya yi kokarin ficewa daga wakiltar ba tare da nasara ba. Daya daga cikin dalilansa, a cewar Bayaninsa, shi ne cewa tana yunƙurin tilasta shi yin halin rashin da'a, wato, yin abin da ba zai iya yi da kyakkyawar niyya ba. Mun san daga takaddar da ya gabatar don neman ci gaba cewa ta yi ƙoƙari ta sanya shi ya gabatar da “shaidu” da yawa da ba za a yarda da su ba (wataƙila ta hanyar wasiƙu daga ƙawayenta, da kuma zarge-zargen da ba su da tallafi), don haka muna zargin yana nufin wannan.

Shi ma lauyanta ya nemi ya janye saboda da alama tana yi masa barazana saboda ba zai yi mata tayin ba. Ya bayyana cewa sadarwa tare da Prause ta lalace sosai. Wannan ya faru ne bayan da ya shigar da martaninta ga bukatar Wilson ta anti-SLAPP (kuma babu wani aikin shari'a da za a yi gaba da sauraron karar).

Alkalin ya yanke shawarar kada ya jinkirta sauraron karar, kuma Lauyan mai ba da shawara na kamfanin ya wakilta Prause, wanda ya yi kyakkyawan aiki a madadinta - ko da yake ba shi da wani aiki da shi har zuwa lokacin da alkali ya yanke hukunci a kan duk hujjojin da suka nuna ga Prause's. sanarwa.

Yi aiki da ƙarya a cikin sanarwarta. Exampleaya daga cikin misalai mai kyau shine Yi amfani da karyar faɗar cewa “sakamakon ayyukan Gary Wilson, Na sake komawa wurare da yawa".

A cikin tweets, tambayoyi, labarai, da takaddun kotu, Prause ta sha yin iƙirarin cewa ta ci gaba da motsawa saboda yawancin 'yan fashi da ke numfashi a wuyanta (yafi Wilson). A cikin shigar da karar ta watan Agusta, 2019, Prause ta yi ikirarin cewa ta koma ranar 1 ga Yuli, 2019 "saboda tsoron kaifin Wilson”(Lura da kwanan wata):

Kamar yadda aka shigar da karar kotun Hilton, bukatar da Prause ta yi na dokar hana ta ba ta ƙunshe da wata shaida da ta nuna cewa ta taɓa ƙaura zuwa wurin zama ba, balle ma ta koma saboda Wilson. Zai zama da sauƙi don samar da rasit ko haya, duk da haka Prause ya kasa yin hakan. Godiya ya bayyana mata gaskiya Agusta, 2020 neman fatarar fatara. Ta shigar da ita ne don gudun abin alhaki don 3 da har yanzu ba a yi gwajin batanci ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc), da kuma guje wa biyan Wilson bashin kuɗaɗen lauyan da ta ci (Prause ba a zahiri ba ta cika ba, kamar yadda ta bayar da rahoton ~ $ 270,000 a cikin tanadi). Wannan hoton na fatararta tayi ya nuna Prause bai motsa ba a cikin shekaru 3 da suka gabata!

Me yasa Prause a karshe ta bayyana gaskiya a cikin takardun ta na fatarar kudi cewa, a gaskiya, ba ta ƙaura daga wurin zama ko kasuwancinta ba saboda zage-zage? To, a cikin takardun sai da ta ba da duk wani nau'i na takaddun kudi da na sirri ga kotun fatarar kudi. Idan tatsuniya na motsi akai-akai bai dace da takaddun ta ba, ana iya tuhumar ta da yin rantsuwa. Sabanin haka, babu wani tsarin da aka tanada don bincikar Prause a cikin kwat ɗin Hilton ko kuma a cikin sauraron anti-SLAPP na Wilson, don haka ta sami damar yin karya ba tare da wani hukunci ba.

Nasarar shari'a ta Wilson ta zo ne a kan korafe korafe kan SCRAM Media na Burtaniya don buga labarin karya da'awar cewa Prause ya sami "barazanar kisa" sakamakon kamfen din taron jama'a na NoFap mai masaukin baki, Alex Rhodes. A cewar a Sanarwa daga Burtaniya, Labarin SCRAM ya ba da gaskiya cewa NoFap da Rhodes sun haɗa kansu da masu tsattsauran ra'ayi na dama (ciki har da anti-Semites); tilasta wa masu tsattsauran ra'ayi su matsa wa Prause; gudanar da wani taron jama'a wanda ya kai ga an hana Prause; da kuma gabatar da kararraki a Kotun Tarayya ta Amurka don tsawaita binciken ilimi na Prause. Lokacin da aka gabatar da hujjoji da ke musanta waɗannan iƙirarin, SCRAM ya maimaita labarin, ya biya hodanyan ɓarna da kuɗaɗen doka, da nemi afuwa a bainar jama'a, kafin rufewa gaba daya. (Belowari a ƙasa)

An gurfanar da Prause a cikin shari'o'in farar hula na tarayya guda 3 da ba su da alaƙa da zargin ta da yin karya da gangan da kuma ɓarna game da mutanen da suka tayar da damuwa game da batsa na intanet. (Dubi a sama.) A cikin waɗannan lokuta, masu gabatar da kara sun yi zargin Prause ya yi rashin gaskiya, maganganun batanci da ake zargin su da zarge-zarge, cin zarafi, da nuna kyama, kuma suna da'awar cewa jami'an tsaro da kwararrun hukumomin bayar da lasisi suna binciken su. A kowane hali, maza da mata da yawa sun fito da maganganun rantsuwa cewa Prause ma ya auka musu.

UMARNIN KOTU

Cikakken Labari


4) Prause ya warware kararrakin cin mutuncin Donald Hilton da Alex Rhodes da aka kawo mata

A cikin gwagwarmayar tabbatar da adalci tare da Nicole Prause, an cimma matsuguni a cikin kararraki biyu masu zuwa:

  1. Donald L. Hilton, Jr. v. Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gunduma ta Amurka na Yankin Yammacin Texas San Antonio Division, Shari'a Mai lamba 5: 19-CV-00755-OLG
  2. Alexander Rhodes da Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gunduma ta Amurka don Yammacin Gundumar Pennsylvania, Shari'a Mai lamba 2: 19-cv-01366

Kamar yadda aka saba, ba a bayyana sharuɗɗan sasantawa ba. Koyaya, mun ɗan sani game da sasantawar Hilton-Prause. Ƙarƙashin Ƙarfafawa da aka sanya hannu a cikin shari'ar Hilton (da kuma wasiƙa masu dangantaka) ya zama batu na rikodin jama'a.

~

Anan ga wani yanki daga takaddar kotun da ta dace:

Abin baƙin ciki, Prause bai dakatar da kai hare-haren ta kan layi ba-ko da bayan sun daidaita tare da masu zarginta don kawo karshen waɗannan shari'o'i 2.

5) Hattara! Yada sunan bata suna na iya haifar da alhaki na doka

Media na SCRAM sun dogara da Yin amfani da bayanan ba da labarin Alexander Rhodes da NoFap. Fita ta buga karya. SCRAM ya nemi afuwa kuma ya biya diyya mai yawa ga Rhodes da NoFap. A sakamakon haka, SCRAM da rashin alheri ya fita daga kasuwanci. Hakanan, Yi wasa ya rinjayi abokin aikinta Melissa Farmer don yada ɓatanci game da lauyan Amurka Aaron Minc. Dukansu abokan aikin da kuma Prause an kai ƙarar don ɓata suna. (Duba sashin da ke ƙasa wannan.)

Anan gafara ga jama'a na SCRAM:

Batun afuwa ga Alexander Rhodes da NoFap LLC

Bari 21, 2020

Ta Scram Media, Sam Bright da Kate Plummer

A 20 ga Janairu 2020 mun buga wata kasida a kan scramnews.com mai taken:Ilimi ya sami "barazanar kisa" daga can nesa-dama bayan kamfen din neman mutane don neman ta. "Labarin ya ƙunshi maganganu na karya da maganganu masu yawa game da NoFap LLC ('NoFap') da wanda ya kafa Alexander Rhodes. Musamman, labarin ya ba da kuskuren cewa NoFap da Mista Rhodes suna da alaƙa da masu tsattsauran ra'ayi (ciki har da anti-Semites); cewa sun zo da fatawa mai cike da takaddama mai cike da rudani don tabbatar da ingantaccen binciken ilimi; cewa sun zuga masu tsattsauran ra'ayi su yi musgunawa tare da tsoratarwa ga wanda ake kara a wancan shari'ar (wani Dr Nicole Prause); da kuma cewa sun buga bayanan batattu game da kamfen din don amintar da cunkoso.

Muna fatan sake warware tuhumar da ke kunshe cikin labarin tare da neman afuwa kan barnar da ta haifar wa NoFap da Mista Rhodes ta hanyar littafin.

Mun yarda da cewa abin da muka buga ya kasance yaudara ce kawai da wakilcin da bai dace ba, duka ayyukan da NoFap da Mr Rhodes suka yi, da kuma da'awar ɓata suna da Mista Rhodes ya yi wa Dr Prause, kuma babu Mista Rhodes ko NoFap da suka tunzura membobin kungiyar kungiyoyin tsana masu tsattsauran ra'ayi don tursasawa ko yin barazanar Dr Prause.

Rokon da Mista Rhodes ya yi wa Dokta Prause ba ta damu da binciken da ta yi ba, a maimakon haka, zargin da aka kai wa Mr Rhodes da NoFap ba ne. Za a iya samun kwafin shari’ar na adalci a waccan magana (da aka bayar a Kotun Tarayya ta Amurka) nan. Mun amince da cewa akwai, kuma babu wani abin ɓatar da gaskiya game da yakin neman kuɗi da ke da alaƙa da wannan ƙaddamar.

NoFap wani dandamali ne na dawo da batsa ta hanyar yanar gizo wanda ke ba masu amfani damar yin haɗin kai tare da taimakon al'umma na mutane waɗanda aka ƙaddara don rage ko kawar da amfani da batsa da 'yantar da kansu daga halayen jima'i na tilasta. Sabanin shirye-shiryen da yawa da suka soki al'adar batsa, Shafin yanar gizo na Mr Rhodes ya yi alfahari da kasancewarsa ta duniya, da nuna son kai, da yin jima'i, da kuma tushen kimiyya. Mun fahimci cewa mata da maza daga ko'ina cikin duniya suna amfani da shi, daga ɗabi'ance iri daban-daban, al'adun addini da na ruhaniya (ko rashin imani), abubuwan da suka shafi jima'i da asalinsu, shekarunsu, ƙabilarsu, ƙabilu, da sauran halaye.

Muna fatan yin afuwa ga Mista Rhodes, NoFap da masu karatunmu. kuma mun amince da biyan lada mai yawa ga NoFap da Mista Rhodes tare da kuɗaɗe na doka dangane da lalacewa / damuwa da labarin ya haifar.

Kamfanin Scram Media Limited
Sam Barkiya
Kate Plummer

Sanarwar manema labarai: NoFap LLC da Alexander Rhodes sun sami tabbataccen lalacewa da neman gafara daga Labarin Scram (22.05.20)

Kamfanin Scram Media Limited da biyu daga cikin masu ba da gudummawarsa sun nemi afuwa kuma sun yarda da biyan diyya ga kungiyar NoFap LLC ta Amurka da wanda ya kafa ta Alexander Rhodes bayan buga wani rubutu a shafin ScramNews.com mai taken “Ilimi ya sami "barazanar kisa" daga can nesa-dama bayan kamfen din neman mutane don neman ta. "

NoFap yana gudanar da dandalin dawo da hotunan batsa na kan layi wanda ke bawa masu amfani damar haɗi tare da ƙungiyar tallafi na mutanen da suka ƙuduri aniyar rage ko kawar da amfani da batsa da kuma 'yantar da kansu daga halayen jima'i. Yana karɓar miliyoyin baƙi a kowane wata kuma an gabatar da shi ta fannoni daban-daban, ciki har da CNN, The New York Times, BBC, Kasuwancin Kasuwanci, Mujallar Lokaci, MTV, Washington Post, da Showtime.

Labarin Scram News ya ƙunshi maganganu na karya da maganganu masu yawa game da NoFap da Mista Rhodes. Musamman, labarin ya ba da kuskuren cewa NoFap da Mista Rhodes suna da alaƙa da masu tsattsauran ra'ayi (ciki har da anti-Semites); cewa sun zo da wata fatawa mai ban tsoro da ban tsoro a Kotun Tarayya ta Amurka don karfafa halayyar bincike na ilimi; cewa sun zuga masu tsattsauran ra'ayi su yi zagi da barazana ga wanda ake kara a wancan shari'ar; cewa yaƙin neman kuri'a don ƙaddamar da ƙarar ya haifar da an hana mai kare shi kuma an sanya adireshinsu ta hanyar yanar gizo; da kuma cewa sun buga bayanan batattu game da karar ta hanyar ba da shawarar da ba daidai ba cewa masu kare suna da alaƙa da masana'antar batsa don samun kuɗi.

Yanzu Scram ya wallafa cikakken rami da neman gafara wanda za'a iya samu nan. Wannan ya yarda cewa littafin yaudarar duk aikin da NoFap da Mr Rhodes suka yi, na da'awar ɓatanci da Mista Rhodes ya kawo da kuma yaƙin neman tara jama'a, kuma babu Mista Rhodes ko NoFap da suka tunzura membobin irin waɗannan ƙungiyoyi masu ƙyamar ƙiyayya don tursasawa ko yin barazanar wanda ake kara. Iƙirarin ɓatancin na Mista Rhodes bai shafi binciken da waɗanda ake tuhumar suka yi ba, sai ma zargin da ake yi wa Mista Rhodes da NoFap na ɓatanci. Ana iya samun Karar shari'a a cikin wannan iƙirarin nan.

Kamfanin Scram Media Limited ya amince ya biya Mista Rhodes diyya mai tsoka da kuma kudinsa na shari'a. Ta dauki nauyi ba za ta sake buga irin wadannan zarge-zargen na karya ba.

Ba kamar yawancin shirye-shiryen da suka haifar da damuwa game da batsa ba, NoFap LLC tayi alfahari da kasancewarta, mara son kai, yin jima'i, da kuma tushen kimiyya. Mace da mata daga ko'ina cikin duniya suna amfani da ita, daga ɗabi'u iri-iri, al'adun addini da na ruhaniya (ko kuma ba da imani ba), abubuwan da suka shafi jima'i da asalinsu, shekarunsu, ƙabilarsu, ƙabilu, da kuma wasu halaye.

Da yake bayani game da sulhun, Mista Rhodes ya ce:

"Mu nasara cikin wayar da kan jama'a game da jarabar batsa ta haifar da us Kasancewa ta tsawaita yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda wasu abubuwa waɗanda suke da kusanci da masana'antar batsa, waɗanda suka nemi yin bayyani da arya us kamar yadda ake danganta su da kungiyoyin addini, kungiyoyin kiyayya, da masu tsattsauran ra'ayi a wani yunƙurin ɓata suna us. Yanar gizonmu tana haɗu da mutane daga kowane fanni na rayuwa don shawo kan jarabar batsa tare. Wadannan abubuwan suna da alama suna son yin jayayya game da batun kuma su bayyana mana yadda za su nisantar da mutane daga ra'ayoyin mu na gaskiya, da abubuwan da suka shafi, da kuma sashin binciken kimiyya. Duk da ci gaba da ɓarnarsu da yaƙin neman zaɓe, zamu ci gaba da samar da albarkatu don murmurewa masu lalata abubuwan batsa. "

NoFap LLC da Alexander Rhodes sun kasance wakilai a cikin da'awar Burtaniya ta Yaya Wilson da kuma Elisabeth Mason.

Detailsarin bayani game da wannan labarin.


6) Yi amfani da alamun ja da baya kuma ya biya $$$ don daidaita karar bata mata suna

A cikin watan Yulin 2020, a bayyane ya nuna cewa abokin aikinta Melissa Farmer PhD ya taimaka ya yada ɓata mata suna game da lauya Aaron Minc. Kamfanin na Minc yana wakiltar Alexander Rhodes a cikin karar ɓatar da shi da ya yi da Prause, kodayake wani lauya a zahiri wakiltar Rhodes (ba Minc ba). Koyaya, Minc ne kawai ke da asusun Twitter. Wannan alama shine dalilin da yasa aka yi niyya ga Minc a fili tare da daji, tweets marasa tallafi suna da'awar cewa Minc ya aika da bayanan sirri na Prause ga "mutanen da ke barazanar kashe ta (shekaru)."

Duk da musantawar da Minc ya yi a kan Twitter, Manomi, ɗayan mabiyan da aka ruɗe da Prause, kai tsaye ya raba tweets na ɓatanci game da Minc tare da Barungiyar Barikin Jihar Ohio, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, da asusun Twitter na Kotun Koli na Kotun Koli! A wani ɓangare na yaƙin neman zaɓen, Farmer ya yi da'awar cewa Minc ya tafka ƙa'idar da'a. Don ƙarin sakamako, Manomi ya haɗa hoton allo na Dokokin Ohio na Professionalwararriyar Professionalwararriyar 4.4.abi'a XNUMX da aka ɗauka daga gidan yanar gizon Kotun Koli na Ohio. (Yi aiki a kai a kai yana ambaton ƙa'idodi da ƙa'idodi marasa mahimmanci don ƙarfafa kamfen ɗin ɓatar da ita, don haka muna zargin ta kawowa Manomi hoton.)

A Satumba 9, 2020 Aaron Minc, JD aka shigar karar bata suna a kan Melissa Farmer, yana alƙawarin ƙara Fuskantar a matsayin wanda zai tsaya masa a matsayin wanda zai tuhumi Farmer da ɓatanci idan kuma a lokacin da mai gabatar da kara na fatarar kuɗi ya ba da izinin ("Saukewa daga Tsayawa"). Duba - Satumba, 2020: Aaron Minc, JD ya ba da sanarwar ɓata sunan Nicole Prause (Minc yana da kamfanin lauya mai wakiltar Alex Rhodes). An ƙara amfani da kyau. Jerin abubuwa uku da Aaron Minc yayi:

  1. Aaron Minc vs Melissa Farmer (Satumba 9, 2020)
  2. Motsi don taimako daga tsayawa Prauseara Amfani da korafi (a cikin fatarar fatarar kuɗi) Nuwamba 10, 2020
  3. Bayanan baya dangane da wannan takaddama (Afrilu 23, 2021)

A halin da ake ciki, alkalin ya ki amincewa da aikin Manomi na Motion To Dismiss, kuma an tsayar da shari’ar. Ya bayyana cewa kamfanin inshorar Farmer ya gane cewa da alama kwastomominsa ba zai ci nasara ba, kuma muna yin zato cewa ta zo shirin hada-hadar kudi ne tare da Minc. A watan Afrilu, 2021 Farmer ya gabatar da yarjejeniya tare da Minc, wanda alkalin ya rattaba hannu a kansa. A zaman wani bangare na wannan sulhun Manomi ya gabatar da takardar rantsuwa furtawa, a tsakanin sauran abubuwa, cewa,

5. A lokacin da na buga tweet din, bani da wata hujja da ke nuna cewa Aaron Minc ya tsunduma cikin wani aiki wanda ya sabawa ka'idojin aikin kwararru na Ohio, kuma bani da wata masaniya ta kaina cewa Aaron Mine kai tsaye ya tura gidan Nicole R. Prause da adireshin aiki zuwa gungun mutane da ke barazanar kashe ta tsawon shekaru. Ina matukar nadamar buga tweet din kuma na fahimci kuskure ne a buga tweet din. Ba ni da wata hujja cewa zargin da ake yi wa Mista Mine gaskiya ne. Ba ni da wata hujja cewa iƙirarin da Nicole R. Prause ya yi gaskiya ne. Ina neman afuwa ga Mista Minc kan duk wata damuwa da ayyukana suka haifar. (girmamawa bayar)

A takaice, ya bayyana cewa Melissa Farmer da lauyoyinta ba za su iya ba da wata hujja ba don kare maganganun ta na (Prause) game da Minc. Manomi ya yarda da wannan, ya yarda da kayen da ta yi, ya fita. Wannan ya bar Yin amfani da shi don fuskantar tasirin halayenta shi kaɗai. Amma Farmer ya ɗanɗana damuwa, abin kunya da kuma tasirin kwararru na ƙararrakin saboda godiya da aka sa shi cikin kamfen ɗin ɓarna na lalata.

Har yanzu, a bayyane yake cewa yada labaran ƙarya na iya haifar da mummunan sakamako ga waɗanda aka ruɗe su.

Daga Afrilu 14, 2021 - MAGANGANUN KUDI DOMIN SHIGA HUKUNCIN KARSHE:

SHAFI # 3, suna suna Yi amfani:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~

SHAFI # 6 - Rage hankalin Farmer yana musanta da'awar Prause:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Prause kuma yana warwarewa kuma ya yarda da aikata ba daidai ba

Shekaru biyu bayan haka, bayan jagorantar wanda aka azabtar, lauya Aaron Minc, da Kotu suna neman tsada, bata lokaci, Prause ta fuskanci shari'a ta kusa. Sai dai ta amince cewa ta bata sunan lauya Haruna Minc, kuma ta biya shi kudi domin ya dakatar da shari’ar.

Ga shigar da ta yi ba daidai ba daga cikin takardun Kotun. Lura cewa Prause ta ce ba ta da wani dalili da za ta yi tunanin cewa Haruna Minc ya “taɓa wa [ta] cin zarafi ta kowace hanya, ko ta taɓa yin aiki ko ba da haɗin kai da kowa don ya yi mata lahani ta jiki.”


7) An kori karar da Prause ta yi kan lauyan Rhodes

Bayan shigar da rahotannin gudanarwa guda biyu da suka gaza (kuma marasa cancanta) ga Ofishin Ba da Shawara ga Kotun Koli na Ohio, Prause ya shigar da ƙarar ƙaramar ƙaramar ƙaramar California ba daidai ba a kan lauyan Ohio Andrew Stebbins, wanda ba shi da alaƙa da ikon California. Stebbins ya wakilci Rhodes da NoFap a gaban shari'a game da Prause, gami da fatarar ta.

Prause yayi ƙoƙarin tabbatar da yanke hukunci akan lauya - wanda a hankali bai halarci zaman ba (watau, bai gabatar da kansa ga ikon CA ba). A ranar 29 ga Disamba, 2023, Babban Kotun California, Lardin Los Angeles ta yi watsi da karar Prause (wanda aka shigar da shi ba daidai ba da kuma tashin hankali) a kan Stebbins, ba da izinin yanke hukuncin da aka yanke a cikin kuskure.


8) atararriyar alamar kasuwanci mara kyau

A Janairu 2019, Nicole Prause ta nemi takaddun alamun kasuwanci da aka kafa na YBOP, ciki har da keɓaɓɓen haƙƙin amfani da na Wilson ainihin URL ("YourBrainOnPorn.com ”), tare da ra'ayin raba YBOP da nata shafin nasa. Wannan ƙoƙari ne na takunkumi ta hanyar Prause, wanda ya kasance da damuwa da cin zarafin Wilson a kan shekaru 8. Ba wai kawai ba, ta yi ƙarya akan aikace-aikacen da aka rantse cewa ta san cewa babu wanda ke da haƙƙi a cikin alamomin da take nema… ko da yake ɗayan alamun shine URL na Wilson wanda aka yi amfani da shi (kuma a ƙarƙashin harin ta Prause) kusan kusan shekaru goma! Ƙirar ƙarya.

Yunkurin kwace alamar kasuwanci ma haramun ne. Don shigar da shi, ta (ƙarya) ta yi iƙirarin cewa babu wanda ya isa ya yi amfani da shi face Fuskanci URL na Wilson, wanda Wilson ya shafe kusan shekaru goma yana amfani da shi, wanda kuma ta yi ta tozarta a bainar jama'a tsawon shekaru. Hakanan dole ne ta bayyana cewa idan ta yi amfani da alamar ba zai yuwu ta haifar da rudani ko kuskure, ko yaudara ba. Lura cewa irin wannan sanarwa ta gangan da ta ƙarya ana hukunta shi ta hanyar tara ko ɗauri, ko kuma duka biyun, a ƙarƙashin 18 USC 1001.

Aikace-aikacen alamar kasuwanci na Prause ya tilasta Wilson shiga fadace-fadacen shari'a masu tsada da ita (8-shafi dakatar & dakatar da wasika zuwa Nicole Prause - Mayu 1, 2019). Sai kawai lokacin da za a ci gaba a Kotun Tarayya Ta yi watsi da aikace-aikacen alamar kasuwancinta na ƙarya (Oktoba, 2019).

Bayan ta nema gaza, alamun kasuwanci an yi rajista da sunan Wilson a cikin 2020.

cinikin ciniki

A cikin “faruwar lamarin,” Lauyan lauya na shari'a game da takaddun alamar kasuwanci shi ne Wayne B. Giampietro, ɗayan manyan lauyoyin da ke karewa Shafin baya.com. Gwamnatin tarayya ta rufe shafin yanar gizon "saboda saukin kai da fataucin mutane da karuwanci." (Duba wannan USA Today labarin: NUMididdigar 93-ƙididdiga game da tuhumar fataucin masu jima'i da aka bayyana a kan waɗanda suka kafa shafin Backpage).

Takardar tuhumar ta tuhumi masu gidan na Backpage.com, tare da wasu, da hada baki don a sauƙaƙe aikata laifuka na karuwanci ta gidan yanar gizon Backpage.com. Mahukunta sun ce wasu daga cikin wadanda aka fataucin sun hada da 'yan mata matasa. Don cikakkun bayanai game da sa hannun Giampietro duba: https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilndce/1:2017cv05081/341956. Shafin baya.com kadarorin Arizona suka kwace, tare da Wayne B. Giampietro LLC da aka jera a matsayin asarar $ 100,000.


Me ke faruwa tare da Nicole Prause?

A cikin 2013 tsohon mai bincike na UCLA Nicole Prause ya fara nuna damuwa da jin dadi, da kuma yin watsi da labarun Gary Wilson. (Prause ba ta kasance mai daukar ma'aikata na cibiyar ilimi ba tun daga Janairu, 2015.) A cikin ɗan gajeren lokaci kuma ta fara kai hari ga wasu, ciki har da masu bincike, likitocin likita, masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali, masu ilimin halin dan Adam, tsohon abokin aikin UCLA, wata kungiyar agaji ta Birtaniya, maza a farfadowa, a TIME editan mujallar, masanan furofesoshi, IITAP, SASH, Yakin Sabuwar Magunguna, Firayen Fitowa, NoFap.com, Sabuntawa, YourBrainRebalanced, littafin jarida Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, iyayensa MDPI, US likitoci na likitoci, shugaban jaridar kimiyya CUREUS, da mujallar Yin jima'i da jima'i da jima'i (Duba - Yawancin Wadanda Aka Nashe Na Rahoton Mai Laifi na Nicole Prause da Amfani da iciousarna).

Yayin da ta shafe awanni tana tursasawa wasu, Prause cikin hikima ya tsara - tare da sifilin tabbataccen shaida - labari ne cewa ta kasance "Wanda aka azabtar" mafi yawan duk wanda ya yi kokarin yarda da abin da ya fada game da illolin batsa ko halin bincike na batsa (Dubi: Nicole Prause qarya na wadanda aka tona-hood aka fallasa ta zama mara tushe: ita ce mai cin zarafin, ba wacce aka azabtar). Don magance cin zarafin da ake ci gaba da yi da kuma iƙirarin ƙarya, YBOP ya zama dole ya tattara wasu ayyukan Prause. Yi la’akari da shafuka masu zuwa. (Additionalarin abubuwan da suka faru sun faru cewa bamu isa mu 'yanta ba - kamar yadda waɗanda ke cikin Prause suna tsoron karin azaba.)

A farkon Farawa yayi amfani da dama sunayen masu amfani na asali don sakawa batsa dawowa matsala, Quora, wikipedia, da kuma cikin comment sashe a karkashin labarai. Sallah da wuya ta yi amfani da sunanta na hakika ko nasa asusun kafofin watsa labarun. Wannan duk ya canza bayan UCLA ya zaɓi ba sabunta kwangilar Prause (kusan Janairu, 2015).

Ya sami 'yanci daga duk wani aikin dubawa kuma yanzu yana aiki da kansa, Fuskantar ya kara manajoji / masu tallata kafofin watsa labarai biyu daga Media 2 × 3 zuwa karamin kamfanin kamfaninta na “Masu hadin gwiwa.” (Media 2 × 3 shugaba Jess Ponce ya bayyana kansa a matsayin mai horar da kafofin watsa labarai na Hollywood da masanin keɓaɓɓen masani.) Ayyukansu shine sanya labarai a cikin latsa yana nuna Prause, kuma ta same ta magana shawarwari in pro-porn kuma wurare masu mahimmanci. Tsarin maganganun ga masanin kimiyya ba tare da nuna bambanci ba.

Amincewa ta fara sanya sunan ta ga ƙarya, a bayyane ta hanyar cin zarafin mutane da ƙungiyoyi da yawa akan kafofin watsa labarun da sauran wurare. Tun Manufa ta farko ita ce Gary Wilson (daruruwan bayanan kafofin watsa labarun tare da bayan yakin neman imel), ya zama dole a sa ido da kuma rubuta Tweets da sakonnin Prause. Anyi wannan don kariyar waɗanda aka cutar, kuma yana da mahimmanci ga duk wani aikin doka na gaba.

Ba da daɗewa ba ya zama fili cewa tweets da sharhi na Prause sun kasance da wuya game da bincike da jima'i, ko kuma wani nau'in batun da ya dace da ita. A gaskiya ma, yawancin wuraren da aka yi wa Prause za su iya raba kashi biyu:

  1. Taimakon kai tsaye na masana'antar batsa: Mai lalata & & ad hominem tsokaci game da mutane daban-daban da kungiyoyi da ta lakaba mata a matsayin "masu gwagwarmayar lalata da batsa" (galibi suna ikirarin cewa wanda aka cutar da wadannan mutane da kungiyoyi). Sanya anan: Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5.
  2. Kai tsaye tallafin masana'antar batsa:
    • tallafin kai tsaye na FSC (Jagorar Magana Ta Musamman), AVN (Adult Video News), masu sauti na wasan kwaikwayo, masu wasan kwaikwayon, da kuma abubuwan da suka dace
    • asarar rashin fahimta game da binciken batsa da kuma hare-haren da ake yi akan batsa ko kuma masu binciken batsa.

Wannan shafin yana ƙunshe da samfurin tweets da tsokaci masu alaƙa da # 2 - ƙaƙƙarfan goyan bayanta na masana'antar batsa da matsayin da aka zaɓa: Shin Nicole Farko ya shawo kan masana'antar Porn? An rarraba shafin zuwa manyan sassan 4:

  1. SASHE NA 1: Nicole Prause & masana'antar batsa:
    1. Tashin zargi wasu game da masana'antar batsa kudi wasu daga cikin binciken nata (amma ba wanda ya ce haka)
    2. A cikin 2015 da Jagorar Magana Ta Musamman tana bada taimako na Prause: ta yarda kuma nan take ta kaiwa Prop 60 (kwaroron roba)
    3. The Jagorar Magana Ta Musamman ana zargin an ba da batutuwa don Nazarin Nazarin da ta yi iƙirarin za su “lalata” jarabar batsa
    4. Taimakon kai tsaye don yin amfani da batsa da masana'antar jima'i (FSC, AVN, XBIZ, xHamster, PornHub, BackPage.com, da sauransu)
    5. Yi kusancin kawance tare da masu yin masana'antar batsa, daraktoci, furodusoshi, da dai sauransu.
    6. Shaida cewa Nicole Prause ta shiga alamar finafinan fina-finai (XRCO, AVN)
  2. SASHE NA 2: Shin Nicole yayi amfani da "PornHelps"? (Shafin yanar gizon PornHelps, @pornhelps a Twitter, sharhi a ƙarƙashin shafuka). Duk asusun da aka share sau ɗaya An yi masa kisa kamar "PornHelps."
  3. SASHE NA 3: Misalan Nicole Prause da ke tallafa wa masana'antar batsa ta hanyar ɓatar da bincike da kai hare-hare kan karatu / masu bincike.
  4. SASHE NA 4: “RealYBOP”: Fada, Daniel Burgess da abokansa sun kirkiro gidan yanar gizo na son zuciya da asusun sada zumunta don tallafawa shirin masana'antar batsa, da tursasawa da bata sunan wadanda suke fadin wani abu mara kyau game da batsa.

Bayan shekaru suna zaune a kan shaidar, YBOP yana da ra'ayin cewa zaluncin da aka yi wa Prause ya haɓaka zuwa irin wannan ɓatancin da rashin mutunci (karyata zargin da yawa wadanda aka azabtar na "jiki na matse ta, ""misogyny, ""karfafawa wasu don yi mata fyade, "Kuma"kasancewa ne-Nazis“), Cewa an tilasta mana mu binciki yiwuwar dalilan ta.

Lura: Akwai tabbataccen shaida wanda ke nuna cewa masana'antar batsa ta tallafa wa sana'ar ta ilimin jima'i shekaru da yawa. Tsarin ilimin Sexology har yanzu yana fitowa don bauta wa masana'antar batsa. Don haka, shaidar a wannan shafin ya kamata a duba shi a cikin babban mahallin. Duba Hugh Hefner, Cibiyar Harkokin Jima'i ta Duniya, da kuma Shugaban {asashensa don fahimtar yadda batsa-masana'antu da jima'i masu jima'i suka rinjayi Kinsey Institute. Gunawa ne Kinsey grad.