Amsarmu ga "sharhi" na Rory Reid na nazarin Nicole Prause 2013 EEG (Steele et al., 2013)

YBOP COMMENTS:

Below ne YBOP Yuli, 2013 amsa zuwa "Bayanin Nazarin Ɗaukaka Nazari" by Rory C. Reid, PhD (Ma'aikatar Harkokin Siyasa, Jami'ar California, Los Angeles). Me ya sa muka rubuta amsa ga Bayanin Rory Reid na Nicole Prause ta “Jima'i Jima'i, ba jima'i ba, yana da alaka da Amsoshin Neurophysiological Maɗaukaki da Hotuna“? Domin ba kushe ba ne sam. Madadin haka, kariya ce ta rufin karatu na EEG mai suna (Steele et al,, 2013). Kyauta ta farko ita ce Rory Reid ya ambaci Gary Wilson sau goma a cikin abin da ake kira “suka”. Na biyu, Reid ya faɗi sau 3 na na Gary Wilson Psychology yau blog post nazarin nazarin karatun Prause ba'a sake buga shi ba. Dukansu Reid da Prause sun san sosai dalilin da yasa ya ɓace: Fuskantar matsawa Psychology yau don cire ba kawai sakon Wilson ba, amma wannan matsayi ta wasu masu rubutun ra'ayin yanar gizo guda biyu. A ƙarshe, bayanin Rory Reid ya kasa magance kowane ɗayan mahimman abubuwanmu, ko bayyana bayanin kuskuren Prause ga manema labarai. Madadin haka, Reid yana karkatar da zargi ta hanyar yin kwatancen abin da binciken YBOP ya faɗi. Lura: Rory Reid ya bayyana cewa ofishinsa na UCLA yana nan kusa da gidan Prause (kuma duka biyun suna zama abokan zama).

UPDATE: Kafin mu isa ga bayanin Rory Reid kuma Steele et al.Sakamakon ainihin, yawancin ya faru tun Yuli, 2013. UCLA bai sabunta yarjejeniyar Nicole Prause (a cikin Janairu, 2015) ba. Ba a sake yin amfani da aikin koyarwa a dogon tarihi na hargitsi da kuma lalata Gary Wilson da sauransu, ciki har da masu bincike, likitoci, likitoci, masu ilimin psychologist, tsohon abokan aiki na UCLA, sadaukarwa a Burtaniya, maza a dawowa, TIME editan mujallar, masanan farfesa, IITAP, SASH, Yakin Jaridar New Drug, littafin jarida Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, kamfanin iyayensa MDPI, shugaban jaridar mujallar CUREUS, da mujallar Yin jima'i da jima'i da jima'i. Duba: Takaddun rubuce-rubuce na Nicole Prause na ɓarna da tursasawa Gary Wilson & wasu da yawa (da kuma yanzu shafi na biyu kuma a shafi na uku).

Muhimmiyar maimaita: Duk da yake Prause ta ci gaba da nuna cewa ita ce "wanda aka azabtar da ita," shi ne Kalmomi wanda ya fara samarda duk wani matsala da kuma matsala ga mutane da kungiyoyi da aka jera a wannan shafin. Babu wanda ke cikin jerin shafuka na baya wanda ya dame Nicole Prause. Tana da'awar da'awar cewa an yi masa mummunan 'yanci' ko '' misogyny '' daga 'yan gwagwarmayar' yan ta'adda '' 'ba su da nau'i daya daga cikin takardun. Dukkanin shaidar da ta bayar ta fito ne: wani shafukan yanar-gizon guda ɗaya, 'yan imel daga gare ta zuwa wasu suna kwatanta rikice-rikicen, da kuma dakatarwa biyar da haruffa da ke dauke da zarge-zarge. Har ila yau za ka ga shaidun da dama na gunaguni na gargajiya An yi rajista tare da hukumomi daban-daban - waɗanda aka dakatar da su ko kuma aka bincika su kuma sun watsar. Tana iya gabatar da wadannan takunkumi don haka za ta ci gaba da cewa sun yi ta neman "duk da haka" a karkashin bincike. "

Gudanarwa ba ta da alamun misalai na kasancewar manufa ta hanyar cyber-stalking ko ta hanyar tweet, Facebook, ko haɗe zuwa shafukan kan YBOP. A gefe guda, Abin da Twitter ya yi amfani da Twitter ya ba shi sau ɗaya kawai daruruwan na tweets maras kyau da suka dace da manufa da Wilson (da yawa da yawa) (Tun daga lokacin da aka share 3,000 irin waɗannan tweets). A sauƙaƙe, Labaran ya haifar da tarihin da ba tare da shaida ba, yayin da kusa da haɗin kai da kamfanonin batsa, kamar yadda za a iya gani daga wannan Hoton ta (nesa dama) a kan karar launi na Ƙungiyar Masu Rauni na XRCO (X-Rated Critics Organization). (A cewar Wikipedia, da XRCO Awards an ba da Amurka Ƙungiyar Ƙungiyar X-Rated a kowace shekara ga mutanen da ke aiki a nishaɗi na yara da kuma it shine kawai ƙwararrun masana'antun masana'antu da aka nuna kawai don 'yan kasuwa.^[1]) Don ƙarin ƙididdiga, duba: Shin Nicole Farko ya shawo kan masana'antar Porn?).

Amsarmu ga Rory Reid (Yuli, 2013):

Muna farin cikin ganin amsa ga tambayoyin da muka gabatar, koda kuwa hakan ya zama mai sukar aikin Prause yayin da kawai ke sukar masu sukarta. Kamar yadda yawancin abubuwan da muka faɗakar da su ba a kula da su ba, ko kuma muka juya don samun maana daban, muna so Dr. Reid ya tambayi Dr. Prause don amsa tambayoyin da ke biyowa:

1) Me yasa kuka juya shi cewa bincikenku ya nuna luwadi shine ainihin "babban" sha'awar "lokacin da bincikenku ya sami haɓakar ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwa mafi haɗuwa da ƙananan sha'awar jima'i? Lura da kalmomin Prause a wannan hira:

Mene ne babban binciken a cikin bincikenku?
“Mun gano cewa amsar kwakwalwa ga hotunan jima'i ba ta yi hasashe da ɗayan matakan tambayoyi uku daban-daban na yin luwadi ba. Aminiya kawai kawai aka annabta wani ma'auni na sha'awar jima'i. A wasu kalmomin, jima'i ba ya bayyana bayyana bambancin bambance-bambance a cikin jima'i duk fiye da kawai samun babban libido."

Amma hakan bai faru ba, kamar yadda John Johnson PhD ya bayyana a ciki wannan ƙwaƙwalwar da aka yi wa ɗan adam:

'Mahimmancin binciken da aka gano na ƙididdiga ba shi da wani abu game da jaraba. Bugu da ƙari, wannan gagarumin bincike shine mai rashin daidaituwa tsakanin P300 da sha'awar jima'i da abokin tarayya (r = -0.33), yana nuna cewa P300 amplitude yana da alaƙa da rashin sha'awar jima'i; wannan ya saba da fassarar P300 a matsayin babban sha'awar. Babu kwatanci da sauran kungiyoyi masu shan magani. Babu kwatanci ga ƙungiyoyi masu kulawa. Maganar da masu bincike suka tattara sune tsinkaye daga bayanan, wanda ba ya faxi game da ko mutanen da suka bayar da rahoto game da rikice-rikice suna kallon yadda suke kallon hotunan jima'i ko kuma ba su da irin maganganun kwakwalwa kamar su cocaine ko wani nau'i na addicts '

2) Dokta Prause, me yasa ka ambaci ƙungiyar “cikin-batun” saboda wannan ba shi da mahimmanci ga Steele et al.Sakamakon da aka bayyana kawai:

"Hanyoyin P300 da suka fi girma ga jima'i masu jima'i, dangane da matsalolin tsaka-tsakin, sun kasance da alaka da matakan jima'i, amma basu da alaka da matakan jima'i."

translation: Mutanen da ke da matukar karfin-amsawa zuwa batsa suna da sha'awar yin jima'i tare da abokin tarayya (amma ba ƙananan sha'awar yin al'ada ba). Don sanya wata hanya: mutanen da ke da ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwar ajiya da sha'awar batsa za su fi son lalata batsa fiye da yin jima'i da ainihin mutum. Ba shi da mahimmanci ga ƙungiyar da ake kira "cikin-batun" mai kulawa.

3) Dr. Prause, me ya sa kuka yi da'awar da'awar a cikin labarun Psychology Yau da sauran wurare? A Psychology yau hira:

Menene manufar binciken?
Yi wasa: Nazarinmu ya gwada ko mutanen da ke bayar da rahoton irin wadannan matsalolin suna kama da wasu mabiya addicts daga maganganunsu na kwakwalwar su akan hotuna masu jima'i. Binciken dabarun miyagun ƙwayoyi, irin su cocaine, sun nuna alamar kwakwalwa ta hanyar mayar da martani ga siffofin miyagun ƙwayoyi na zalunci, saboda haka mun yi annabci cewa ya kamata mu ga irin wannan yanayin a cikin mutanen da ke bayar da rahoton matsaloli da jima'i idan har, a gaskiya, buri.
Shin wannan ya nuna jaraba da jima'i shine labari?
Idan bincikenmu ya sake yin rikitarwa, waɗannan binciken zasu wakilci babban ƙalubalen gwagwarmaya game da jima'i "jima'i". Dalilin da wadannan binciken ke ba da kalubale shi ne cewa yana nuna ƙwaƙwalwar su ba ta amsawa ga hotuna kamar sauran magunguna ga maganin likita ba.

Abubuwan da ke sama suna da'awar cewa batutuwa kwakwalwa ba ta “amsa kamar sauran masu shan maye ba tare da tallafi ba. A cikin Steele et al., batutuwa suna da karatun EEG (P300) mafi girma yayin kallon hotunan jima'i - wanda shine ainihin abin da ke faruwa yayin da masu yin lalata ke kallon hotunan da suka danganci jarabarsu (kamar wannan binciken akan addinan cocaine). Sharhi a karkashin Psychology yau hira na Farisa, Farfesa Farfesa, John A. Johnson, ya ce::

"Zuciyata ta ci gaba da nunawa a lokacin da ake kira Prause cewa 'jinin' yan matansa ba su amsa tambayoyin jima'i kamar 'yan kwantar da hankali ba,' sun amsa tambayoyin da suke yi, don sun ba da rahoton P300 mafi girma don hotunan jima'i. Kamar dai abin kunya ne wadanda ke nuna P300 spikes lokacin da aka gabatar su da miyagun ƙwayoyi. Yaya za ta iya yanke shawarar cewa shi ne akasin ainihin sakamakon? Ina tsammanin wannan zai faru ne saboda irin tunanin da take yi — abin da ta zata samu. ”

4) Dr, Fuskanci, menene alaƙar tsakanin bayanan EEG da duk tambayoyi 14 akan Inventory na Jima'i (SDI)? Zan amsa: babu wani muhimmin alaƙa. Binciken ya gabatar da rahoton adadi na sha'awar jima'i, amma yana da wannan ƙaddamarwa:

Kammalawa: Abubuwa ga fahimtar juna da juna biyu a matsayin babban sha'awar, maimakon zalunci, an tattauna.

Me yasa duniya za ku yi iƙirarin "babban sha'awar" lokacin da masu magana tare da mafi girma mai-amsawa ta da ƙananan sha'awar jima'i da abokin tarayya. Bugu da kari, kalmar nan "sha'awar jima'i" an maimaita sau 63 a cikin binciken, kuma taken binciken (Jima'i Jima'i, Bawai Luwadi ba….) Yana nuna cewa haɓakar ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwa zuwa alamomi yana da alaƙa da sha'awar jima'i mafi girma. Bugu da ƙari, duk kanun labarai sun yi ihu cewa “jarabar jima'i” babban buri ne da gaske? Amma ba babban buri bane!

5) Dr. Reid ya ce, "Wani batun da zan gabatar shi ne rashin jin dadin na yadda Mista Wilson ya kori EEG a matsayin fasaha." A ina muka kori EEG a matsayin fasaha? A gaskiya ma, amsarmu tana da nasaba da nazarin 2 da suka yi amfani da EEG a takaice kuma suna da hankali a cikin binciken abubuwan da aka yi musu. Mun kawai nuna cewa, ba kamar maganin ƙwayoyin cuta ba, jarabawar jima'i-halayyar jima'i yana haifar da bayanai masu yawa. Yin ikirarin ƙididdiga dangane da aikin EEG yana da lahani saboda rashin iyakokin fasaha.

6) Dr, Prause, a ina ne shaidun cewa "sha'awar dyadic kadai" ana amfani da ita azaman ma'aunin "sha'awar jima'i?" Kuna ci gaba da da'awar wannan, amma tallafi kawai da binciken ke bayarwa don wannan iƙirarin ya saba da da'awar ta (nazarin 1, nazarin 2. Bugu da ƙari, don haka yi tsokaci daga ɗayan masu haɓaka SDI, Ilana Spector, wanda muka tuntube don ƙoƙari don fahimtar da'awar Prause (da zarar mun sami karatun da aka ambata a ciki ya saba musu). Spector, wanda ya tabbatar mana da cewa SDI ana da niyyar gudanar da ita a matsayin guda, ya ce, “An inganta sikelin ne kawai ta hanyar amfani da DUK abubuwan guda biyu da kuma na dyadic…. Ba a tsara sikelin don amfani ba (kamar yadda yake a nan) kuma ba a inganta ta wannan hanyar ba. ”

7) Dokta Prause, hakika ka san yarjejeniyar daidaitacciyar nazari akan jaraba da yin nazarin kwakwalwar kwakwalwa. To, me ya sa ya kasance batutuwa maza da mata, ciki har da 7 wadanda basu da namiji? Nazari bayan nazari ya tabbatar da cewa maza da mata suna da matukar banbancin kwakwalwa game da hotunan jima'i ko fina-finai. Nazarin ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwa mai amfani ya ƙunshi batutuwa masu kama da jinsi: jinsi ɗaya, daidaitawar jima'i, tare da shekaru masu kama da IQ. Wannan shi kadai yayi rangwame ga bincikenku.

8) Dokta Prause, ta yaya za ku iya ba da hujjar waɗanda ba maza da mata ba a cikin gwaji tare da batsa kawai - sannan kuma ku yanke shawara mai yawa daga rashin daidaituwa? Wannan kuma yana kiran sakamakon ku cikin tambaya.

9) Dr. Prause, me ya sa babanku ba su da kariya? Ƙwararren ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwa don nazarin mutane don yanayin da suka rigaya suka kasance (rashin tausayi, OCD, sauran ƙyatawa, da dai sauransu). Wannan kuma yana kiran sakamakonka cikin tambaya.

10) Dokta Prause, me yasa kuka yi amfani da SCS (Siffar ularfafa Jima'i) alhali kuwa ba ingantaccen gwajin kima ba ce game da jarabar batsa ta Intanet ko na mata? An ƙirƙira shi a cikin 1995 kuma an tsara shi tare da jima'i mara ƙarfi dangantakar a hankali (dangane da bincikar cutar AIDS). Bugu da ƙari, wannan shine ya bayyana dalilin da yasa babu dangantaka tsakanin P300 karatu da SCS.

Komawa kan abubuwanda ake nema game da Jima'i (SDI), da kuma iƙirarin Rory Reid cewa mun rasa wasu sakamakon na Solitary SDI:Mista Wilson ya yi ƙoƙari ya tabbatar da cewa Dr. Prause ya kasa yin nazari akan wani asalin SDI wanda ke amfani da ita a bincikenta“. Karanta abin da muka faɗa a zahiri, farawa nan. Mun bayyana a sarari cewa babu wata dangantaka da ta kasance a lokacin da aka yi amfani da dukan SDI. Wannan gaskiya ne. Duk da yake Steele et al ya bayar da rahoton rashin daidaito a tsakanin karatun EEG da tambayoyin SDI wanda aka raba, wannan binciken ya nuna kanta a matsayin maƙasudin nazarin binciken kuma labaran karya game da “sha'awar jima'i“. Sakamakon ainihin daga binciken:

"Hanyoyin P300 mafi girma ga jinsin jima'i, dangane da matsalolin tsaka-tsaki, shine ba daidai ba mai alaƙa da matakan sha'awar jima'i, amma ba shi da alaƙa da matakan luwadi. "

translation: Mutanen da ke da matukar karfin-amsawa zuwa batsa suna da sha'awar yin jima'i tare da abokin tarayya (amma ba ƙananan sha'awar yin al'ada ba). Don sanya wata hanya - mutanen da ke da ƙwaƙwalwar ƙwaƙwalwar ajiya da sha'awar batsa za su fi son lalata batsa fiye da yin jima'i da ainihin mutum. Ya bambanta da tambayoyin da kanun labarai.

Dubi Table 2 daga cikakken rubutu na binciken.

Danna don kara girman Table 2

Da farko, "Bayanin" ya ce zangon gwajin gwaji shi ne "3-26," kuma amma ma'anar mace ta wuce ta. Kusan 26.46 – a zahiri daga sigogin. Me ya faru?

Mafi mahimmanci, duk da haka, idan SPAN Lab ya auna ainihin "sha'awar jima'i" ta amfani da cikakken SDI, masu binciken sa zasu ƙara babban al'aura-sha'awar ma'anar kashi 23.92 (daga 26) zuwa ma'anar haɗin gwiwa-sha'awar ma'anar kashi 58 (mai yuwuwa 70). Don haka, ainihin “sha'awar jima'i” ma'ana ci shine wanda yakai 82 (na yiwuwar 96).

Me zai faru idan mutum yayi kwatankwacin ainihin (tambaya 14) sakamakon "lissafin sha'awar jima'i" tare da bayanan EEG? Babu wata dangantaka mai mahimmanci ko kaɗan. Babu wata da'awar da ba ta dace ba game da wargaza manufar "jarabar jima'i," babu wata hanyar watsa labarai da ke nuna tsoro, kuma ba a bukatar duk wata tsoratar da al'amuran bayan fage don kokarin tona asirin binciken. A takaice, Steele et al. binciken ɗan ƙaramin hulɗa tsakanin karatun EEG da tambayoyin tambayoyi zai iya zama binciken da ba shi da amfani (mai sauƙin bayyana ta wasu raunin hanyoyin).

Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa binciken ya ƙunshi kuskure na biyu dangane da SDI: “Tsarin SDI matakan matakan jima'i ta amfani da su Sikeli biyu hada da abubuwa bakwai kowannensu.”A hakikanin gaskiya, Inventory inventory Inventory ta ƙunshi tambayoyi tara da suka shiga, tambayoyi guda hudus, da wata tambaya wanda ba za a iya rarraba (#14) ba. Gidan watsa labaran watsa labaran, wanda ya hada tare da buga wannan binciken, ya kafa asusun da ya sa ido a kan sakamakon SDI. Duk da haka nazarin binciken ya ƙunshi kurakuran ɓoye game da SDI kanta, wanda ba ya haifar da amincewa ga masu bincike.

Psychology Yau da kuma Nicole Prause

Ee, Ilimin halin mu a yau an saukar dashi. Fahimtarmu ce cewa an cire shi saboda barazanar doka da ba ta da iyaka game da "Psychology yau," yana zuwa daga Dokta Prause kanta. A zahiri, kwana guda bayan haka, PT ya cire wani rubutu namu wanda ya gabata… game wani nazarin SPAN Lab. Abubuwan da muka ƙwace kawai a cikin shekaru 4 na rubutun ra'ayin kanka a yanar gizo sune ginshiƙan da suka danganci Yin amfani. Hmm. Kimiyya tana ci gaba da muhawara, ba irin wannan tsoratarwa ba.

Dokta Reid (na sama) sau biyu yana da alaƙa da tsohuwar rubutunmu a kan "Psychology yau" (wanda yanzu ke nuna shafi wanda ba a buga shi ba) kuma ya ba da shawarar cewa an share shi saboda imanin "Psychology yau" cewa ya ƙunshi kurakurai. Ganin cewa mu kanmu mun sami mummunan rauni, barazanar doka daga Dr.Prause, muna da shakka game da wannan.

Kodayake muna ƙin yin taƙaita imel a bainar jama'a, a wannan yanayin, muna jin ya zama dole don masu karatu masu sha'awar su sami cikakken hoto game da dabarun Dr. Prause. Duba dukkan musayar imel tsakaninmu da ita (a ƙasa). Waɗannan sun faru ne watanni da suka gabata, a cikin Afrilu, 2013, lokacin da ta "leaked" wani abin da ba a buga ba, ba a sake duba shi ba na wannan binciken (kawai) ga mai rubutun ra'ayin yanar gizo David Ley, marubucin Labarin na Jima'i Jima'i. Daga baya ta sami “Psychology yau” cire amsarmu. Ba zato ba tsammani, sai muka nemi editocin “Psychology yau” su cire post ɗin Ley bisa ga binciken da aka zube (wanda Prause ta ƙi bayarwa ga wasu), kuma “Psychology yau” ta cire shi. (Alkalin da kanka: Latsa nan don ganin rubutun David Ley, shafin amsar amsar mu, da kuma bayanan da ke ƙasan post ɗin mu - gami da Musayar Musa tare da Nicole Prause.)

Lokacin da binciken karshe ya fito, Fuskantar ya nemi Brian Mustanski don gabatar da wata hira mai kyau, inda Prause za ta iya "juya" sakamakonta ga abin da take so. Mun buga amsar sakonsa, kuma wannan shine abin da Prause ya cire "Psychology yau".

Ka tuna cewa Sharuɗɗan yana da damar da za a yi sharhi a kan sakonnin mu game da karatunta biyu (duka biyu za'a iya samun su Binciken Nazarin Hotuna. Madadin haka, ta zaɓi kar ta ɗauke mu kai tsaye. Yanzu, ta ɓoye a bayan sharhin gidan yanar gizon Dr. Reid, inda ba a ba da izinin amsa kai tsaye daga masu sukar ba.

UPDATE: Tun lokacin da aka fara kirkirar wannan shafin Prause ya ci gaba da yin niyya ga Gary Wilson da sauransu, gami da masu bincike, likitocin likitoci, likitocin, likitocin tunani, abokan aiki daga takaitaccen tarihinta a UCLA, wata baiwa ta kasar Burtaniya, Maza a cikin murmurewa, TIME editan mujallar, masanan furofesoshi, IITAP, SASH, Yakin Sabuwar Magunguna, Firayen Fitowa, littafin jarida Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, kamfanin iyayensa MDPI, shugaban jaridar mujallar CUREUS, da mujallar Yin jima'i da jima'i da jima'i. Duba: Nicole Prause ta Cin zarafin ethabi'a da Defatancin Gary Wilson & Sauran

UPDATE: A kusa da Janairu 2015: Nicole Prause ba a sake aiki da UCLA ko wata cibiyar ilimi ba.

UPDATE: Akwai sharuɗɗa na 8 masu nazari akan su Steele et al., 2013. Duk zayyana tare da bin YBOP na gaba. Dukkan yadda aka gano Steele et al., 2013 ta ba da tallafi ga buri na batsa. Takarda #1 ne kawai ke da shi Steele et al. Takardun 2-8 sun ƙunshi sassan da ke nazari Steele et al., 2013:

Nicole Prause - musayar imel na Gary Wilson:

Maris 5, 2013

Mawallafin "Tarihin Jarabar Jima'i," David Ley, da kuma Nicole Prause tawagar su rubuta wani Psychology yau blog post tare da dabarun take: “Brain naku a kan Batsa - BAYA BUYA. " (Your Brain On Porn ne mai yanar Wilson ne ya kafa shi.) Ya kasance game da Nicole Prause wanda ba a buga shi ba, duk da haka za a sake nazarin ƙwararrun ƙwararrun EEG ("Sha'awar jima'i, ba liwadi ba, yana da alaƙa da martani na neurophysiological da hotunan jima'i ke bayarwa").

Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa Ley ne kawai ya sami damar yin amfani da karatun da ba a buga ba (an buga shi watanni 5 daga baya). Shafin yanar gizon da aka danganta da gidan yanar gizon Wilson 'Brainka a Yanar gizo' kuma ya ba da shawarar cewa YBOP yana goyon bayan hana batsa (ba gaskiya ba).

Mahimmin bayani: Watanni biyar kafin binciken EEG na Prause (Steele et al., 2013) da aka buga, duka biyu da Prause da Ley suna da manufa da Gary Wilson da kuma shafin yanar gizonsa.

Maris 7, 2013

Wilson ya wallafa Psychology yau blog post amsawa ga abun ciki a cikin post David Ley. Ley's blog post da amsa Wilson an ƙarshe an cire su Psychology yau masu gyara, saboda har yanzu ba a samo asalin binciken ba. Kuna iya nemo asalin bayanan gidan yanar gizo na Ley da Wilson nan. Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa shafin yanar gizon Wilson ya bayyana a sarari cewa yana amsawa ga Ley ne kawai description na Nazarin karatu. Daga baya Nicole Prause za ta zargi Wilson da yin kuskuren gabatar da karatunta (wanda ita da Ley ne kawai suka gani, kuma suna yin da'awar jama'a game da - waxanda suke daga bisani ya nuna rashin tushe).

Maris 7, 2013

Wilson ya gabatar a ƙarƙashin labarin David Ley yana neman binciken:

“Ya kai David - Ina mamakin yadda ka sanya hannunka kan binciken da har yanzu ba a buga shi ba, ko aka ambata a ko'ina. Ko kana shirye ka aiko min da kwafi? ”

David Ley bai amsa ba.

Afrilu 10, 2013

A sakamakon wannan magana, Amfani ya tuntube shi Psychology yau editoci da kuma imel Wilson da wadannan. A cikin imel ɗin, Kai hare-harer Wilson da kaina, kuma kuskuren furta cewa bai nemi binciken ba. Ya haƙiƙa ya tambayi David Ley a gare shi. Imel ɗin:

Psychology Yau ([email kariya])
4/10/13
don: [email kariya]
Daga: Nicole Prause
Ya Mista Wilson,
Ba doka ba ce a gare ku ku yi kuskuren gabatar da iliminmu ba tare da ko da kwafin rubutun ba. Za'a kula dashi kamar haka. Labarinmu ya daidaita sosai. Ba kamar ku ba, Ina da wallafe-wallafe na bita a bangarorin biyu na wannan batun. Kun yi ƙoƙari ku ɓata shi ta hanyar bayanin abubuwan da ba a yi ba. Ina bin wannan ne tare da Psychology yau a yanzu, amma zan shawarce ku da ku cire mukamin da kanku kafin a tilasta ni in ci gaba da aiki.
Ba ku da damar izinin kowane ɓangare na wannan imel ɗin. Sakamakon sadarwa ne.
Sayar da littattafanku bisa cancantar ku. Kada kuyi ƙoƙarin neman kuɗi ta bayan masana kimiyya suna yin aikinsu. Zan iya fada wa wannan binciken a fili yana firgita ku saboda zane da bayanan suna da karfi, amma abin takaici ne da ba a nemi kwafin rubutun ba kuma kawai kun cika abun ciki. Kunya gare ki.
Nicole Prause, PhD
Binciken bincike
UCLA

Bugu da kari, Psychology A yau masu gyara sun aika da imel na biyu daga Gida:

Kwanan wata: Afrilu 10, 2013 5: 13: 30 PM EDT
Tambaya: Sharhi a kan Blogs
Daga: Nicole Prause, PhD
Ga wanda ya damu:
Na yi mamakin ganin wani labarin da aka rubuta game da binciken da nake da shi ta Gary Wilson Psychology yau.
Ba ni da matsala tare da shi wanda yake wakiltar ra'ayinsa da fassarorin karatunsa, amma baiyi ba, kuma ba zai iya samun damar shiga wurina ba. An yi la'akari da shi kuma bai taba buƙatar kwafi daga kowane mawallafi ba. Na sanar da shi cewa ya kamata a cire shi. Bai riga ya yi haka ba. Tabbas, idan an rubuta shi a fili, zai sami damar yin amfani da ita kuma zai iya wakilta shi (mafi kyau).
Tabbas, yin kuskuren sane da mutum ya yi musu lalata ba bisa ka'ida ba ne. Ina fata Psychology Yau za ta dauki wannan matsala. Zan tuntubi wasu mambobin kwamitin, idan kullunku ya cika kuma yana iya ɗaukar tsawon lokaci don amsawa.
Na gode don taimakon ku wajen magance wannan al'amari.
gaskiya,
Nicole Prause, PhD

Labaran doka marar tushe, da'awar karya, da kuma kunna wanda aka azabtar ya fara ne a farkon hulɗa da Wilson. Babu wani abu da ya dace ya nuna gaskiya ne:

Wilson bai bayyana karatun Prause ba ko ɓata shi ta kowace hanya. Ya amsa kawai ga na Ley description na binciken. Karanta Ley's da Wilson's blog posts kuma ku yi hukunci a kanku.
Har wa yau Kuskuren bai riga ya karyata kalma daya a Wilson ta Maris, 2013 Psychology yau post, ko nazarin Wilson ya rubuta a Yuli bayan nazarin binciken EEG a ƙarshe ya buga. Kuma ba a yi amfani da komai ba a cikin kalma ɗaya a cikin huɗun nazari na jarrabawa na nazarin nazarinta ta 2013 EEG (1, 2, 3, 4.).
Wilson bai sanya kudi ba daga wannan aikin.
Wilson ya buƙaci kwafin nazarin (Kariya ya ƙi kawo shi).
Yi amfani da farawa tare da Wilson.

Wasikun Wilson amsa zuwa Nicole Farko:

A ranar Laraba, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:14 PM, gary wilson <> ya rubuta:
Hi Nicole,
Na yi sharhi a cikin sharhin ku. Yi kallo.
Ba mu da kuɗi a kan wannan. Gidan yanar gizo na ba shi da talla kuma ba mu karɓar kyauta. Ba mu da sabis don sayarwa. Ba ni da littafin da zan sayar. Littafin matata, wanda ya bayyana akan PT, ba batun batsa bane.
Idan kuna son yin adalci da gaske, da fatan za a aiko mana da cikakken binciken kuma ku ba mu izinin yin blog game da shi - kamar yadda kuka yi da Dr. Ley.
Zan jira karatun ku,
Gary Wilson

Afrilu 12, 2013

Kwana biyu bayan haka Prause ya tuntubi Wilson ya sake barazanar kara aikin karar. Ta ko ta yaya ta biyo baya ɗayan maganganun Wilson akan shafin dawo da batsa Kwakwalwar ku ta daidaita. An buga shi a kan dogon layi game da asalin rubutun David Ley. Bayanin Wilson yana nufin bayyana dalilin da yasa na Ley da na Wilson Psychology yau An cire sakonni daga Psychology yau. Wannan ya nuna alamar yin amfani da cyberstalking, kamar yadda Google ba zai iya gano wannan post ba. Yaya aka yi amfani dasu game da wannan zane a kan batsa maida forum?

Imel ɗin da ake amfani dasu:

Nicole Prause (nprause@________)
4/12/13
Ya Mista Wilson,
A cikin gidanku: http://yourbrainrebalanced.com/index.php?topic=7522.50
Kuna da'awar ƙarya: "Na amsa mata saƙon imel mara kyau tare da buƙatar ganin karatun ta, amma ta ƙi."
Wannan shi ne lalata. Don Allah a cire wannan sakon ko zan bi tare da aikin shari'a.
Nicole Farko

Wilson amsa:

A ranar Fri, Apr 12, 2013 a 11:09 AM, gary wilson <> ya rubuta:
Ƙaunar Nicole Farko,
Wataƙila ba ku sani ba cewa matata ta kammala karatun makarantar koyon aikin lauya ta Yale. Ban ce komai ba. A zahiri, maganganun na sunyi daidai.
1) Kun ƙi yarda da nazarin binciken da ba a buga ba.
2) Kun kasance m da barazana, kamar yadda kuke yanzu.
3) Bugu da} ari, ka yi maƙirarin cewa, na ba da ku] a] en ku] a] e, daga wa] ansu mutane, da ke fafitikar dawowa daga buri.
4) Har ila yau, kun ɓata matsayin na PT, saboda ya kasance bayyananniyar amsa ga bayanin David Ley na binciken da ba a buga ba. Ba ku zaɓi gyara bayanin Ley ba ko ku ba ni cikakken binciken, koda lokacin da na yi tambaya game da shi a cikin ɓangaren sharhi wata ɗaya da suka gabata.
Har yanzu ba ku amsa tambayoyin na na asali (da aka gabatar a cikin sashe ba)
1) Me yasa kuka saki karatun ku ga David Ley kawai? Kamar yadda marubucin "Labari na Jima'i Jima'i," kuma wanda ya yi iƙirarin batsa batsa ba zai iya zama, me ya sa shi kaɗai ne zaɓaɓɓe?
2) Me yasa baku gyara fassarar karatun karatun David Ley ba? An kwashe sama da wata guda, kuma kun yi sharhi sau biyu a kansa a cikin watan da ya gabata.
3) Kunyi sharhi a ƙarƙashin rubutun Ley wata ɗaya da suka gabata. Nan da nan na sanya tsokaci a ƙarƙashin ku sharhi, tare da takamaiman takamaiman tambayoyin da aka yi muku game da karatunku. Wannan shine damar ku don amsawa da bayar da binciken. Ba ku yi ba. Me ya sa?
Ina lafiya tare da yin musayar mu ga jama'a. Shin ba zai zama mai ban sha'awa ba lokacin da kuka shigar da ƙara a kan wasu masu rubutun ra'ayin yanar gizon PT waɗanda suka yi ƙoƙari su ɗauki bincikenku?
Mafi,
Gary Wilson

Yi amfani da imel tare da ƙarin da'awar hauka & barazanar doka [Lura: Babu Wilson ko matarsa sun fara tuntuɓar hulɗar da Yin amfani. Ita ne wanda ya tuntube su akai-akai kuma ya yi musu barazanar da doka ba tare da doka ba.]

Daga: nprause@________ Kwanan wata: Jumu'a, 12 Afrilu 2013 15:01:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [PT] Tambaya via Psychology A yau
Ya ƙaunata Gary,
Wannan shi ne sanar da kai da matarka cewa ba a son sadarwar ku (da ku da matar). Dokokin bin doka a cikin jihar ku (http://courts.oregon.gov/Lane/Restraining.page), duk wani ƙarin haɗari da za a haɗar da shi za a fassara shi a matsayin rikici.
Ba ku da izini na raba wannan sadarwar sirri a kowane taron.
Nicole Farko

Wilson ya aiko imel na ƙarshe zuwa Gidajen aiki, don saita rikodin a madaidaiciya: cewa ita ce wanda ke farawa da duk lambar sadarwa da kuma mutumin da yake barazanar (da kuma ƙaryar ƙarya):

daga: [email kariya]

Don: nprause Subject: RE: [PT] Tambaya ta Psychology A yau
Kwanan wata: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15: 44: 12 -0700
Ƙaunar Nicole Farko,
Tashin hankali? Ban ƙaddamar da musayar imel daya tare da ku ba, har da wannan.
Na farko, farawa a kan 4 / 10 / 13, inda kake da imel ɗin karshe. Kuma wanda ke ƙasa, inda kake ƙoƙarin ƙirƙirar ƙarya cewa wani yana tursasa ka, lokacin da hakika kana barazana ni a karo na biyu.
Hakanan kai ne wanda ya tuntuɓi editan Psychology yau don ya sa baki a cikin rubutun na. Matata ba ta taɓa tuntuɓarku da abin da za a yi ba.
Ba mu buƙatar izinin ka.
Gary Wilson

Wannan kawai farkon ne don Nicole Prause. Duba: