Kokarin da Nicole Prause ya yi don ya sami takarda ya sake nazarin takarda (Park et al., 2016)

Park et al

Wannan shi ne labari na ban mamaki game da yadda Nicole Prause ta yi amfani da kowane irin dabarar tunani don ƙoƙarin hana buga takarda da aka yi bita, Park et al, a cikin babban jaridar tarihi. Takardar da ke cikin tambaya: Shin Intanit Intanit yana haifar da Dysfunctions na Jima'i? A Review tare da Clinical Reports (Park et al., 2016). [Kamar yadda farkon 2020, Park et al. ya kasance wanda aka rubuta a kan 80 sauran takardun da aka bincika, kuma shi ne takarda mafi kyan gani a tarihin mujallar Kimiyya].

updates:

  1. Sabuntawa (lokacin rani, 2019): A watan Mayu 8, 2019 Donald Hilton, MD ya gabatar da karar da se kara a kan Nicole Prause & Liberos LLC. A ranar 24 ga Yuli, 2019 Donald Hilton ya gyara karar sa na bata sunan don haskaka (1) mummunan ƙarar Hukumar Kula da Masu Binciken Kiwon Lafiya ta Texas, (2) zarge-zargen ƙarya da ake yi wa Dokta Hilton ya ɓata takardunsa, da kuma (3) takardun shaida daga wasu 9 da aka yi amfani da su na cin zarafi da ɓata sunaJohn Adler, MD, Gary Wilson, Alexander Rhodes, Staci Sprout, LICSW, Linda Hatch, PhD, Bradley Green, PhD, Stefanie Carnes, PhD, Geoff Goodman, PhD, Laila Haddad.)
  2. Sabuntawa (Oktoba, 2019): A kan Oktoba 23, 2019 Alexander Rhodes (wanda ya kafa reddit / nofap da kuma NoFap.com) yi karar da aka bata sunan sa Nicole R Prause da kuma Nasarawa. Duba kotu a nan. Duba wannan shafin don takardun farko na kotu uku da Rhodes ya shigar: NoFap wanda ya kirkiro Alexander Rhodes ya gurfanar da Nicole Prause / Liberos.
  3. (Nuwamba, 2019): A ƙarshe, wasu daidaitattun bayanan watsa labarai game da ƙarar mai zargi, mai ɓarna, mai cin zarafi, ƙeta alamar kasuwanci, Nicole Prause: "Alex Rhodes na ictionungiyar Taimakon Batsa ictionwararriyar 'NoFap' ya Obsunshi Lafiyar Farfesa na Farfesa don lalata kai" na Megan Fox na PJ Media da kuma "Yaƙe-yaken batsa sun zama na mutum a cikin Nuwamba Nuwamba", na Diana Davison na Millennika na Post. Davison ya kuma samar da wannan bidiyon na mintuna na 6 game da halayen rashin ladabi na Prause: "Shin batsa mai jaraba ne?".
  4. MDPI shine ƙarshen dutsen kankara. Duba - Rahoton Mummunan Nicole Prause da mummunar Amfani da Aiwatarwa.
  5. Nicole Prause & David Ley sun yi ƙarya a shari'ar ɓata sunan Don Hilton.
  6. Sabuntawa (Agusta, 2020): A cikin Maris na 2020, Prause ya nemi izinin hanawa na wucin gadi na lokaci (TRO) a kaina ta amfani da “shaidar” karya da kuma karyar da aka saba yi (zargin da ni da yi). A cikin bukatar Prause na hana bin umarnin sai ta yi wa kanta rauni, ta ce na sanya adireshinta a YBOP da Twitter (ɓarna ba wani sabon abu bane da Salisu). Na shigar da kara a kan Prause na rashin amfani da tsarin shari'a (TRO) don yin shiru da tursasa ni. A ranar 6 ga watan Agusta, Kotun Koli ta Los Angeles ta yanke hukunci a kan kokarin Prause na neman a hana ni ya zama wani mummunan abu kuma wanda ba shi da doka “a shari'ar dabaru game da halartar jama'a" (galibi ana kiranta da "SLAPP kwat"). A zahiri, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ya yi amfani da umarnin hana shi don tursasa wa Wilson yin shuru da kuma cin mutuncin 'yancin magana da ya yi. Ta hanyar doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya wajaba Prause ya biya kudin lauyan Wilson.
  7. Sabuntawa (Janairu, 2021): An gabatar da karar a karo na biyu na shari'ar rashin adalci a wurina a cikin Disamba, 2020 don zargin cin mutunci. A wani ji a ranar 22 ga Janairu, 2021 an Kotun Oregon ta yanke hukunci a kan ni kuma ta tuhumi Yin amfani da farashi da ƙarin hukunci. Wannan ƙoƙarin da bai yi nasara ba yana ɗaya daga cikin karar dozin Yi amfani da barazanar da / ko gabatarwa a fili a cikin watannin da suka gabata. Bayan shekara da shekaru na mummunan rahoto, ta kara yin barazanar barazanar kararraki na gaskiya don kokarin rufe wadanda suka bayyana ta kusanci da masana'antar batsa da kuma mummunar ɗabi'arta, ko waɗanda suka gabatar da jawabai a cikin kararraki 3 na ɓata suna a halin yanzu da ke aiki a kanta.

NA BAYA NA GABA:

  1. "Wa ke kallon karyata Watch? " - sabuntawa kan abubuwan da suka faru.
  2. Fage - janar
  3. Tarihin MDPI na gaba: da Yale Journal of Biology & Magunguna, da "Janey Wilson" (Amfani da laƙabi).
  4. Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa version of Park et al., Da kuma ƙoƙari na janye hankali na Prause
  5. Yi amfani da amfani da kafofin watsa labarun don tayar da MDPI, masu bincike waɗanda suke bugawa a cikin mujallolin MDPI, da kuma kowa da yake ba da labarin Park et al., 2016
  6. Mayu, 2018: Yin amfani da kirkirar kirkirar tsana da yawa don shirya shafin MDPI Wikipedia (kuma an dakatar da shi ne don sock-puppetry & defamation)
  7. 2019: A cikin rantsuwa da aka gabatar a Kotun Tarayya, Gary Wilson ya bayyana cewa Prause (1) ya yi amfani da shaidar karya (Janey Wilson) don ɓata da musgunawa Wilson, mai wallafa shi, da Gidauniyar Talla, (2) ya yi ƙarya a cikin imel, a kan Wikipedia , da kuma a cikin bayanan jama'a lokacin da yake furta cewa Gary Wilson ya sami diyya ta kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Talla
  8. Mayu, 2018: Prause ya faɗi game da Gary Wilson a cikin imel zuwa MDPI, David Ley, NeuroSkeptic, Adam Marcus na Sakamako Watch, da kuma COPE
  9. Maganin "Janey Wilson" (Yin amfani da sunan)
  10. Takaitaccen abubuwan da suka faru.
  11. Me ke faruwa anan?
  12. Sabuntawa - Yuni, 2019: MDPI ta wallafa edita game da halin rashin da'a na Nicole Prause
  13. Sabuntawa - Yuni, 2019: Amsar hukuma ta MDPI ga MDPI Wikipedia shafi na fiasco (an shirya shi da dama Nicole Prause sockpuppets)

"Wa ke kallon karyata Watch? "

(An kirkiro wannan sashe bayan an ƙirƙira sassan 2-9.)

Na kasance ƙarƙashin tunanin cewa mutane suna kallo karyata Watch don alhakin, labaran da aka bincika sosai game da bincike. Bayan abubuwan da na samu kwanan nan duk da haka, zan iya tambaya kawai, “Wanene ke kallo karyata Watch? " Ga wane ko menene karyata Watch ya kamata a kula da shi lokacin da ya shiga aikin jarida mai ban mamaki?

A Yuni 13, 2018 karyata Watch (RW) wallafa wani ba daidai ba ne kuma abin da ya faru na ban mamaki kewaye Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa takarda Park et al., 2016. Daga cikin wasu hargitsi, wannan yanki ya yayata bayanai game da yadda Nicole Prause bai yi nasara ba (kuma ba tare da dalili ba) yaƙin na 3 don a sake cire takarda (an rubuta shi a cikin sassan 8 na gaba).

Dole ne, wani tsohon malami, ya yi tuntubi ma'aikatan RW kuma ya ba su abinda ya so a buga - kuma RW ya nuna haɗuwa da su duka kuma ya buga su. My Amsar ta bayyana a ƙarƙashin Takaddama Watch article. Duk da haka, RW ta shirya sharudata sosai kafin ya rubuta shi. A nan zan samar da cikakkun bayanai.

Na farko, maganata wata takarda ce ta imel da na aiko wa Adamu Marcus da Ivan Oransky na RW jim kadan bayan yanki ya bayyana. Bayan kwanaki 3 na imel na baya-da-fitar, RW ta ƙarshe ya gabatar da wasu abubuwan da aka samar (daga imel), amma ya buƙaci zan cire abun ciki wanda ya bayyana hanyoyin da RW bai yi aikin aikin jarida ba.

A nan ne mafi yawan labarin.

1) Babban marubuci, kuma jami'in Naval, Andrew Doan MD PhD ya bukaci Adamu Marcus ya yi magana da ni don bayani game da cikakkun bayanai game da takardun (bayan Marcus ya tuntube shi). Doan ya yi haka ne saboda shi da sauran mawallafin 6 na sauran takardun aiki ne a cikin Rundunar Amurka da kuma "ba za su iya magana game da takarda ba tare da izini daga ofishin Jakadancin Amurka ba." Marcus ya zaɓi kada ya tuntube ni. Maimakon haka ya gudu tare da duk abin da yayi amfani da shi. Daga imel na imel:

Na karanta yankinku, "Gidan jarida ya gyara, amma ba zai juya ba, takarda mai rikitarwa akan batsa na yanar gizo. "Kamar yadda ƙaddarar manufar karyata Watch yana da mutunci a cikin wallafe-wallafen, na yi imani za ku so a gyara wannan labarin a cikin manyan al'amura masu muhimmanci. A cikin halin yanzu yana ƙunshe da kurakurai da yawa da kuma rashin kuskuren lalacewa. Na yi nadama cewa ba ka tuntube ni kamar yadda Doctor Doan ya ba da shawara ba, don haka an hana wannan kuskure.

2) RW masu jagoranci Adam Marcus da Ivan Oransky an kofe a ranar May, 2018 MDPI-Prause musayar imel. Kamar yadda na fada a cikin imel na zuwa RW:

Ina damu sosai Sakamako Watch's Amfani da raguwa na imel na MDPI da Dr. Prause ya kwafe ka. Kamar yadda aka aiko ni da imel, na san akwai wasu bayanai da yawa a cikinsu. Rushewar raguwa sun hada da karya da rashin amfani da wasu daga cikin Dokta Prause. Duk da yake Dr. Lin ya kasance mummunan magana (Turanci ba shine harshen farko ko na biyu ba), ina tsammanin maganganunsa ya kamata a 'ji' saboda gaskiyar cewa Dokta Prause yana ci gaba da kamuwa da kamfani, kuma ta hanyar COPE, don kusan kusan shekaru biyu. Ya damuwarsa da sauƙin ganewa. Ba Dr. Prause a "fassarar" a kan halin da ya aikata na mummunan hali yayin da yake nuna cewa ya kasance marar kyau kuma, mafi mahimmanci, ya bar masu karatu da kyakkyawar hangen nesa.

Dole ne a lura cewa RW ba a kwafe shi ba a cikin rassan imel marar iyaka, daga shekaru 3 da suka gabata, inda Gida ya yi wa MDPI rauni, Amurka Navy, da likitoci Navy 7, Fasaha Taba, Mai buga littafina, da dai sauransu. Kuma babu wanda ya san ta da imel da yawa ga COPE da jami'anta.

3) A cikin watan Mayu, 2018 MDPI-Yi amfani da musayar imel, Marcus da Oransky an ba su sau biyu wannan shafi mai mahimmanci wanda ya rubuta tarihin tarihin Prause na masu tayar da hankali ga masu bincike, marubuta, likitoci, likitoci, masu ilimin psychologist, tsohon abokin aiki na UCLA, sadaka a Birtaniya, maza a dawowa, babban jami'in TIME editan mujallar, masanan furofesoshi, IITAP, SASH, Yakin Jaridar New Drug, MDPI, da kuma shugaban jarida na kwaleji CUREUS. A hakika, RW ya ƙi kulawa da littafin Prause ya wallafa labarunsa don buga fassarar da aka yi masa.

4) A cikin imel ɗin da ke biyo bayan abin da ya sa RW ya kasa rubutawa na (sake rubutawa), sai na ambaci Marcus da Oransky cewa ainihin maganganun RW din ya yi kuskure:

Kamar yadda abubuwa ke tsayawa, ko da ma labarin da kake yi ba ƙarya bane. Abokan da ke tare da Kayan Gida (Reward Foundation (TRF) a koyaushe an bayyana shi, a cikin farko Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa labarin da kuma a cikin gyare-gyare na baya (da asali na PubMed). Dalilin da sabuntawa da aka buga ya yi wa Dr. Prause's incessant damuwa ikirarin zarge-zarge cewa na sami kuɗi daga TRF, kuma ina yin kuɗi daga littafina (abin da nake samu wanda, a gaskiya, je sadaka).

5) A cikin imel ɗin na zuwa RW, na yi magana a karo na biyu a cikin labarin su:

Har ila yau, yana da mahimmanci a fahimtar cewa "Hannun 77" ba tare da nuna damuwa ba. "Maganar ba gaskiya bane. Ina da takardun waɗannan batutuwa da amsawar tawagarmu (da kuma takardun da 25 na 77 "maki" ba su da dangantaka da Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa takarda).

Dubi wannan sashe don ƙarin cikakkun bayanai game da littafin Prause da ake kira "77 points," da kuma aikin da ba shi da amfani da shi ba tare da wani aiki ba a baya, da yawa daban-daban na takardunmu, an mika su ga Yale Journal of Biology da Medicine.

6) A cikin imel ɗin na zuwa RW, na bayyana a sarari cewa Shaida yana kwance game da binciken California:

Na gaba, yana da mahimmanci don gyara Dokar Prause ta ƙarya cewa binciken California game da halinta ya ƙare kuma ta yi nasara. Ba a kan; wani mai bincike ya gayyace ni in yi shaida a watanni masu zuwa (ranar TBD).

Ana nuna cewa Marcus da Oransky

(1) bai gyara rubutun na RW ba game da shaidar ƙarya da ɓataccen maganganun,

(2) sun sake tabbatar da shaidar a cikin matsayina na dabarar cewa suna da masaniya game da maganganun da aka yi wa Fuskantarwa da tarihin hargitsi da kuma ci gaba,

(3) ya zaɓi kada in yi magana da ni kafin a buga shi, ko da yake babban marubuci na takarda ya bukaci suyi haka,

(4) ya nuna cewa na kasance mai haɗari ne ta hanyar ƙarya na furta cewa binciken California ya cika kuma ya yanke shawara a cikin aikin Prause, kuma ta hanyar haɗawa da Daily Beast asusun abubuwan da suka faru, da kuma

(5) ba su gyara ko baza su buga wani abu ba kamar aikin jarida mai ban mamaki, kuma ba a nemi jama'a ba da gafara ga mawallafa da jarida wanda suka nuna ladabi ba tare da dalili ba.

Bayanan karin bayani game da labarin RW ba a rufe ta ba. Na farko sakin layi ya ce:

"Bayan wallafawa, masu suka sun nemi COPE da ya duba takardar."

"Masihir" jam'i? Abin sani kawai "mai sukar" wanda ya aiko ko dai MDPI ko COPE: Yi masa godiya. Ta aika da takardun jiragen ruwa na Amurka, sun ruwaito likitocin 7 a kan takarda zuwa ga likitocin su, kuma suka juya zuwa ga kafofin watsa labarun don tayar da ni, MDPI, da masu bincike da suka buga a MDPI - a matsayin wani ɓangare na dogon yakin don kauce wa rubuta takarda amsa ga takarda kuma a maimakon yayi ƙoƙari ya sake dawo da shi ta hanyar baya-bayanan da ke tattare da su da kuma rashin fahimtar jama'a.

Wannan labarin ya ce:

"COPE, wanda ba shi da ikon tilastawa, ya ce a cikin imel zuwa ga mawallafin cewa yana da shawarar da za a janye labarin."

COPE kawai ya damu game da batun daya (bisa ga "gaskiya" da aka ba shi): yarda. COPE ya ce:

"Idan har an gabatar da wannan shari'ar a daya daga cikin majalisun mu na COPE, muna jin shawarar za ta kasance ne idan muka yi la’akari da batun janye batun a bisa dalilan neman yardar da ba a bi tsammanin ba”… ..

Yayinda amsawar COPE ta kasance mai zato, bisa ga duk abin da "gaskiyar" ke nunawa kamar yadda aka ba da ita, masu marubuta da MDPI suna damuwa da amsa. A hakikanin gaskiya, likitocin Navy na Amirka sun fi kula da Cibiyar Magunguna na Naval - Dokokin IRB na San Diego. Ƙungiyar Magunguna na Naval Sanarwar ta IRB ba la'akari da rahotanni game da kasa da marasa lafiya hudu a cikin wata kasida don zama binciken mutum ba kuma baya buƙatar marasa lafiya su yarda su shiga a cikin wani labarin. Kodayake ba a bukaci masu bincike su samu izini ba, saboda lokuta biyu, an samu takardun shaida da rubutu. A cikin akwati na uku idan babu yiwuwar an yi amfani da sunan asiri ba, ba a samu izini ba.

Ba zato ba tsammani, a cikin Dokar Dokta Prause, bayan da aka buga takardun, an aiwatar da ayyukan da marubucin Navy suka yi game da wannan takarda a cikin binciken bincike Navy. Sakamako? Ina da kwafin rahoton da wani lauya na Navy ya bayar da tabbacin cewa masu marubuta sun bi duk dokokin IRB.

Har ila yau labarin na RW ya ce:

"Daga cikin maganganun [sic] akwai cewa daya daga cikin marubutan, Gary Wilson, ya kasa bayyana yadda aikinsa yake sosai Gidauniyar Taimako, "

Wannan ƙarya ne. Kamar yadda aka bayyana a baya, an nuna alakata tare da Foundation of Reward Foundation (TRF) a fili, a cikin farko Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa labarin da kuma a cikin gyare-gyare na baya (da asali na PubMed). Dalilin da sabuntawa da aka buga ya yi wa Dr. Prause's incessant damuwa ikirarin zarge-zarge cewa na sami kuɗi daga TRF, kuma ina yin kuɗi daga littafina (abin da nake samu wanda, a gaskiya, je sadaka).

Idan babu kula da kyau, masu karatu na RW na iya so su kasance masu shakka game da yin amfani da RW ta blogs ba tare da bincike ba. RW yana son ya ba da kansa damar amfani da shi ta hanyar da aka tsara ta hanyar kullun ko da a lokacin da aka sanar cewa an bukaci ƙarin bincike.


Tarihi

MDPI shi ne gidan iyayen su na Swiss da yawancin mujallu na ilimi, ciki har da Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa. MDPI yayi ba wallafa wallafe-wallafe masu tasowa. A gaskiya ma, an bincika shekaru da yawa da suka wuce bayan an yi kuskure a kan jerin jerin tarwatsawa, kuma sun yanke shawara sosai don zama mai wallafa. Duba: http://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/534. Mutumin (Jeffrey Beall) wanda ya yi kuskure ƙarshe ya share dukan aikinsa.

Ana yin damuwa tare da MDPI saboda (1) Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa wallafa wasu shafuka guda biyu da suka yi amfani da ita don sun ƙi yarda (saboda sun tattauna da takardu, ta cikin daruruwan takardu da wasu mawallafa), da (2) Gary Wilson shi ne marubucin marubucin Park et al., 2016. Gunawa yana da tarihin yin amfani da yanar-gizon cyberstalking da bautar Wilson, wanda aka lasafta a cikin wannan shafi mai yawa. Takardun biyu:

Takarda na biyu (Park et al.) bai yi nazarin bincike na Farisa ba. Ya bayyana abubuwan da aka gano a cikin 3 ta takardun. A buƙatar mai bincika a yayin aikin bitar binciken, ya yi magana da na uku, takardar 2015 ta Yi Amfani & Pfaus, ta hanyar faɗar a yan jarida a cikin jarida Wannan yana da girman gaske, ya kushe takarda. (Babu isasshen sarari a cikin Park et al. don magance duk gazawar da rashin tabbaci a cikin Yi amfani & Pfaus, 2015).

Komawa nan da nan ya jaddada cewa MDPI ta janye Park et al., 2016. Sakamakon masu sana'a ga masanan kimiyya daya ba yarda da ita shine buga wani sharhi da ke nuna duk wani ƙyama. Kwararren Kimiyya Kamfanin iyaye, MDPI, wanda aka gayyaci Prause don yin wannan. Ta ki yarda. Dole ne a lura cewa fassarar harin Wilson da kuma shafin yanar gizon yanar gizon kullum kuma a fili.

Maimakon wallafa wani sharhi na sharudda, ta yi amfani da rashin amfani da ita ga barazana da kafofin watsa labarun (kuma mafi kwanan nan karyata Watch blog) don bully MDPI cikin retracting Park et al., wanda ni marubuci ne tare da likitocin Navy na 7 na Amurka (ciki har da masu bincike guda biyu, biyu masu ilimin likita da magunguna). Bugu da ƙari kuma, ta sanar da MDPI cewa ta yi takunkumi tare da Ƙungiyar Sadarwar Mutanen Amirka. Ta kuma sanya takarda ga dukkan likitocin likita. Ta kuma tilasta magungunan likitocin likitoci da hukumar kula da tsarin kulawa ta kasa da kasa, ta hanyar bincike mai zurfi, wadda ba ta sami tabbacin rashin kuskuren ga mawallafin marubuta ba.

Yi aiki kuma an yi ta gunaguni akai-akai ga COPE (Kwamitin Etha'awar Talla). COPE a ƙarshe ya rubuta MDPI tare da bincike mai ma'ana game da janyewa, bisa ga labarin Prause cewa "marasa lafiya ba su yarda ba." MDPI ta sake zurfafa bincike kan yardar da likitocin da suka rubuta takardar suka samu, da kuma manufofin Sojojin Ruwa na Amurka game da yarda.

Lura cewa Cibiyar Kiwon Lafiya ta Naval ta San Diego's IRB ba ta yi la'akari da rahotannin shari'ar marasa ƙarancin marasa lafiya huɗu a cikin wani labarin don zama binciken mutum ba kuma baya buƙatar marasa lafiya su yarda da sanya su cikin labarin. Kodayake ba a buƙatar masu binciken su sami izini ba, don lamura biyu, an sami magana da rubutaccen yarda. A cikin na uku inda da alama ba za a iya ɓata suna ba, ba a sami rubutaccen izinin ba.

Ba zato ba tsammani, a cikin Dokar Dokta Prause, bayan da aka buga takardun, an aiwatar da ayyukan da marubucin Navy suka yi game da wannan takarda a cikin binciken bincike Navy. Sakamako? Ina da kwafin rahoton da wani lauya na Navy ya bayar da tabbacin cewa masu marubuta sun bi duk dokokin IRB.

Saboda haka, MDPI ya ki karɓa takarda. An bayyana hakan ga COPE, ba tare da kara ƙin yarda daga COPE ba. Muddin masu bincike sun bi ka'idodin yarjejeniyar IRB na ma'aikatunsu (wanda shine yanayin nan), babu matsala. Kodayake kwarewa ya ci gaba da faɗi ƙarya cewa wannan matsalar ba ta warware matsalar ba kuma "marasa lafiya ba a yarda ba" kuma karbar takaddama ya dace.

Har ila yau, kuna gunaguni ga COPE cewa ina da rikice-rikicen sha'awa da ba a bayyana ba. Bayanan Baya: Na bayyana alamar da nake da ita tare da Foundation Reward Foundation a cikin takarda daga farkon. Wannan ba rikici ba ne na sha'awa. A cikin 2018, jarida ta ba da gyaran da ya canza harshen da ke nuna alaƙata na don tabbatar da shi a fili (har zuwa Gida) cewa babu wata rikici. Ya ambaci littafina, gaskiyar cewa abin da nake fitowa daga littafi ya je Gidauniyar Reward, kuma gaskiyar cewa raɗaɗina ita ce matsayi marar cancanci. Gunaguni ya ci gaba da cewa (ƙarya) cewa ina karɓar dubban fam daga sadaka. Tabbatar cewa ta kuskure ne an rubuta shi a wasu wurare a wannan shafin.


Tarihin pre-MDPI: Yale Journal of Biology & Medicine, da "Janey Wilson"

Labari na kokarin Prause game da takardun da aka buga a asali Park et al. zahiri fara kafin da hannuwar MDPI da Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa. A baya, yawancin rubutu na takarda, tare da mawallafin haka da marubucin marubuta kamar yadda yake a lokacin da aka sallama zuwa Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, an fara gabatarwa Yale Journal of Biology da Medicine (YJBM). Ya kamata a yi nazarin wasu halaye dangane da wannan takarda lokacin da aka yi la'akari da ita YJBM.

Ɗaya daga cikin masu nazarin na 2 na takarda ya ba shi cikakken nazari tare da sukar 70, kuma an ƙi shi. A kusa da lokacin YJBM ya ƙi takarda, "Janey Wilson"Ya fara tsananta wa mai wallafa littafi, Commonwealth Publishing, da kuma sadarwar da aka ba da izini na bayar da kyauta na asusun na na. (Ni ne marubucin Your Brain On Porn: Intanit Pornography da kuma Kimiyya Kimiyya na Addiction.) Bayanin cikakken labarin "Janey", an ba da matsala marar tushe a kasan wannan shafin.

Lura: Yin biyayya ga YJBM ya Abinda nake hulɗa tare da sadaka, Asusun Gida (TRF), za a iya samo shi, kamar yadda ba kowa ba ne. A wasu kalmomi, ban da hukumar TRF da kaina, kawai YJBM edita da masu duba biyu sun san wannan alaƙa. Duk da haka, "Janey" ya yi iƙirarin cewa yana da shaida na wannan ƙungiyar, kuma ya yi amfani da alaƙa da ni don ƙirƙirar wasu zarge-zarge na laifi da TRF da ni. Har ila yau ta aika rahoton da ba tare da nuna bambanci ba da Scottish Charity Regulator, ba tare da wadata ba.

Daga baya, Dokta Prause ta gabatar da labarunta YJBM sake dubawa tare da rahotannin 70 + zuwa wata hukumar daidaitawa (a matsayin wani ɓangare na ƙoƙarin yin takarda da aka buga), don haka yana tabbatar da cewa ta riga ta ba da YJBM tare da nazari mara kyau na takarda. (Ƙarin shaida cewa ta kasance YJBM mai duba ya juya a lokacin Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa tsarin gabatarwa, kamar yadda aka bada labarin a kasa.) Ba zato ba tsammani, ayyukan da Prause yayi ya sabawa dokokin COPE na masu bibiyar tsara. (Sashe na 5 na “Sharuɗɗa akan Ayyukan Ɗabi'a Mai Kyau"), Wanda ke buƙatar masu yin bita su kare duk abin da suka koya ta hanyar binciken.

YJBM (1) "Janey's" ainihin ainihin ainihi, da kuma (2) cewa "Janey" na iya ƙetare dokokin COPE ga 'yan jarida masu duba ta hanyar yin bayanin sirri bayani game da (3) hali hargitsi da "Janey," (XNUMX) ni.

An karɓa takarda da sauri YJBM... sannan kuma ba a buga su ba a cikin wannan mujallar bayan duk, sabili da shawarar da jaridar ta yanke cewa ya yi latti don sake duba bita kuma har yanzu ya cika lokacin kwanan nan YJBM's musamman batun "Yara".


Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa version of Park et al.

An sake sabuntawa da sabuntawar takarda a cikin jarida Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa. Bayan bayanan sake dubawa da sake gyarawa an yarda da shi a matsayin nazari na wallafe-wallafen, tare da nazarin yanayin. Harshen karshe ya bambanta da asali YJBM biyayya.

A lokacin wannan tsari, an sake nazarin takardun ba tare da ƙananan masu nazari na 6 ba. Five sun shige shi, wasu tare da wasu sharuddan da aka ba da shawara, kuma ɗayan ya ƙi shi (wanda ya san)?

Hanya daya daga cikin wannan tsari ya bayyana kamar haka: An sake nazarin takarda sau biyu, ɗayansu yana da mummunan ƙin yarda, daya mai kyau. Abin mamaki game da ƙin yarda, Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa ya aika da takarda don sake dubawa ga sauran masu nazari na 2. Wadannan masu duba sun wuce takarda. Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa sun yi watsi da takarda amma sun yarda mawallafin su "sake dubawa da kuma sake bazawa." A matsayin wannan ɓangare, masu ba da labarin sun ba da marubuta (amma ba sunan) ba. An damu sosai game da damuwa na masu dubawa, suna nunawa (a kan samuwa a kan bukatar).

Daga waɗannan maganganun, ya zama bayyananne cewa "mai ba da shawara mai zurfi" na Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa takarda ya sake nazarin takarda a YJBM. Game da kashi uku na abubuwan 77 da aka tashe ba su da dangantaka da Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa biyayya a duk. Suna magana ne akan abin da yake kawai gabatar a cikin A baya version na takarda, wanda aka sallama zuwa YJBM.

A wasu kalmomi, mai sharhi mai sharhi ya yanke wasu bayanai da dama daga nazarin da aka yi a wani jarida (YJBM), wanda ba shi da wani mahimmanci ga takarda da aka gabatar zuwa Kimiyya mai zurfi. Wannan ba shi da cikakken amfani. Bugu da ƙari, Gwada ƙarshe ya bayyana kanta a matsayin marubucin waɗannan zargi a cikin ta ƙararta zuwa shafukan da aka tsara (duba sama), wadda ta raba ta YJBM nazari akan lalataccen takarda na takarda.

Ba zato ba tsammani, lokacin da ake kira Prause don sake duba takarda a Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa ta bayyana a fili ba ta bayyana cewa ta riga ta sake nazarin takarda a wani jarida ba. Zai kasance mai yin nazari mai kyau don bayyana bayanan da ya gabata.

Bari in taƙaita nauyin da aka yi na Prause a takardun mu. Bugu da ƙari, 25 ko wadansu daga cikin su basu da kome da za su yi da Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa takarda Yayi tambayoyi game da godiya Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa don dubawa. Sunyi magana game da farko da aka gabatar a YJBM. Wannan shi kadai ya kamata ya yi watsi da cikakken nazari daga nazari mai zurfi.

Amma duk da haka, muna yin magana ta hankali ta kowace sharhi don neman duk wani amfani mai kyau, kuma ya rubuta cikakken amsa ga duk abin da aka faɗi Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa da masu gyara. Kusan dukan sauran 50 da ke cikin mahimmancin ra'ayoyin sun kasance ba daidai ba ne a kimiyyar kimiyya, rashin tushe, ko kuma maganganun ƙarya. Wasu sun kasance maimaitawa. Mutane da yawa sun yi kuka game da kasancewar kwatsam daga magungunan 3, ko da yake an rubuta takardun a matsayin "bita tare da rahotanni na asibiti." Wasu sunyi ikirarin wasu daga cikin hanyoyin da muka ambata, amma ba'a tallafa wa takardun da kansu ba. Fiye da abubuwan da 10 suka yi nace cewa likitoci ba su da kwarewa don nazarin marasa lafiya don nazari (!).

A takaice dai, yayin da masu sharhi na kallon sukan inganta kowane takarda har zuwa wani mataki, babu ainihin bukatar "gyara" da yawa daga cikin takarda kanta a cikin sharuddan jawabin Prause. Abin da muka yi shine karfafa takarda ta kanta tare da 50 ƙarin ƙididdigar, don kada wasu masu karatu suyi kowane kurakurai.

An sake rubutun da takarda. Baya ga gaba, masu dubawa biyu da mai edita na dubawa sun sake dubawa kuma sunyi ta da shawarwari daban-daban, ciki har da shawara don sake gina shi a matsayin "nazari tare da nazarin binciken." An ji dadi cewa duk abubuwan damuwa da aka magance, Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa buga takarda.

Ayyuka na janyewa

Nan da nan Prause ya fara nema da cewa takarda za ta janye. Daga cikin wasu ƙoƙarin, ta aika wannan wasikar imel marar amfani wanda ke barazana ga MDPI tare da mummunan labaran idan sun ki karban takarda:

“An shigar da wannan ne a watan Agusta 24, 2016. Yanzu ya zama 12 ga Nuwamba, 2016… .. Idan ban ji komai ba a cikin makonni biyu masu zuwa, za mu fara da rubuta hukumar wannan jaridar tare da gaskiyar lamarin. Watchungiyoyin kare hakkin ragowa da yawa sun riga sun san kuma suna jiran su ji cewa janyewar yana faruwa, amma a maimakon haka za su buga game da gazawar janyewa idan ya cancanta. ”

Ga wata daga cikin barazana ta kanta ga MDPI a ranar labaran, Nov 14, 2016:

“Kimiyyar halayyar mutumci ita ce ma’anar mujallar da ke lalata mutane kuma an san ta a cikin jerin sunayen mujallar da ke lalata da Beall har sai da ka yi masa barazanar cire shi. Yakin watsa labarai na farko game da wannan ya kamata ya bayyana a ƙarshen wannan makon a cikin tashar ƙasa. Mun baku kowace dama da za ku janye wannan takardar ta jabu. ”

MDPI ba daidai ba ne game da damuwa da kwarewar Prause na takarda, kuma ba ta janye shi ba, yayin da yake neman karin bincike game da zarginta. Saga ya ci gaba, da taƙaitaccen bayani yana bayyana a ƙarshen wannan shafin.

A duk lokacin da ya bukaci a yi masa tambayoyin dubban dubban 'yan jaridu, Prause ya fara yin watsi da MDPI (da kuma jarida Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa) a matsayin "fatalwa" a kan kafofin watsa labarun.


Yi amfani da amfani da kafofin watsa labarun don tayar da MDPI, masu bincike waɗanda suke bugawa a cikin mujallolin MDPI, da kuma kowa da yake ba da labarin Park et al., 2016

Babu inda ake yi wa MDPI hari a watan Nuwamba, 2017, tweeting wani labarin wanda ba shi da dangantaka da MDPI:

MDPI tana amsawa:

Wannan yana haifar da Gudun tafiya a kan shafin yanar gizon Twitter (wasu daga cikin tweets da ke ƙasa):

Park et al

MDPI tana mayar da martani ga Yin amfani da:

Park et al

Shugaba na MDPI Franck Vazquez, Ph.D, kuma ya amsa, kamar yadda yake yi:

Park et al

Tsayawa ci gaba (MDPI watsi da rubutun Twitter):

Park et al

Shin Prause yana ƙoƙari ya sa a fitar da MDPI daga PubMed da sauran alamun dangane da gaskiyarta? Tweets uku daga Agusta, 2016 - 'yan makonni bayan haka Park et al., An wallafa 2016:

Park et al

Na biyu tweet:

Na uku tweet:

Wani tweet daga watan Nuwamba, 2017 yana nuna cewa Prause har yanzu hargitsi hukumomi game da MDPI (https://twitter.com/NicoleRPrause/status/935983476775387136):

Daga wani gungun da ya kunshi da dama maganganun ƙarya ta hanyar yin amfani da: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mormontherapist/2016/12/op-ed.html. Articleaya daga cikin labarin da aka ambata shi ne nazarin da likitocin Navy 7 da ni, ɗayan kuma wasu masana ne suka rubuta shi, ciki har da Todd Love PsyD - wanda Kalmomin ya yi matsala. Bugu da ƙari, MDPI an fitar da shi ta hanyar kullun kuma an cire shi kafin Beall ya ɗauki jerin sunayensa.

Kuna yi ƙoƙarin tsoma baki tare da wasu Mujallolin MDPI ta hanyar cin mutuncin MDPI:

Park et al

----

Park et al

Ga wasu misalai na Gwadawa ba tare da ba da izinin shaming wasu don haɗin kai / wallafe-wallafen tare da karɓar kyauta daga MDPI:

Park et al

-

Park et al

----

Park et al

---

Anan Prause ta buga katin da ta fi so - tana zargin wasu na misogyny - ba tare da wata shaidar shaida ba (kamar yadda ta yi da ni da sauran mutane marasa yawa).

Ƙari da yawa da ake zargi da misogyny:

Yi wasa ƙarya da'awar Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa takarda ta kai hari. Wannan lamari ne mai banza da rashin amfani.

Taron Twitter ya ci gaba:

"Maido da batsa" ya sanya jerin YBOP guda biyu, wanda ke haifar da Prause don tweet takarda ta Gary Wilson da likitocin Navy. Yi amfani da da'awar ƙarya cewa ta ɓoye COPE cikin shawarar ba da shawara. Yana da kullun.

Bayan bincike mai zurfi, cikakke, bincike na lokaci, MDPI ta yanke shawarar kada ta soke takardun, kuma ta ba da labarin wani rubutun edita wanda ya soki aikin da bai dace ba. Da zarar aka sanar da Prause, sai ta fara aiki maras amfani, musayar imel na ƙarya tare da MDPI, kwafin wasu shafukan yanar gizo da ta sa zuciya za ta ɗauki kalmarta ga abubuwa kuma ta buga abubuwan da ba'a sani ba. karyata Watch ya rigaya ya bi bukatarta.

Yana da 2019 kuma Prause ta ci gaba da bincika twitter don abubuwan da basu da alaƙa don haka tana da uzuri don tweet ƙaryar tata da kuma labarin Retan ragowa na Watch:

Tura a cikin amsa tambayoyin biyu daga YBOP. Babu jerin kunshe Park et al., 2016.

Janairu 29, 2019:

Ranar Fabrairu 16, 2019, wani likita na likitancin likita ya gabatar da wata magana a 21st Majalisa na Ƙungiyar Turai don Magunguna a kan yanar-gizo tasiri game da jima'i. Wasu 'yan zane-zane da ke kwatanta matsalolin jima'i da ke haifar da yarinya, suna nunawa Park et al., 2016, An tweeted. Tweets sun sa Nicole Prause, David Ley, Joshua Grubbs da abokansu suka shiga Twitter-rage a kan Park et al., 2016.

Yawancin tweets na Turanci suna sauraron maganganun maganganun da Gary Wilson ya shirya don taron 2018 ISSM. Ba zato ba tsammani kuma ba tare da bayani ba an soke magana ta ban mamaki. Ana iya ganin Dokta Prause ne a baya bayan an soke shi yayin da ita kadai ce zata bayar da rahoto (alfahari game da?) Da soke (akai-akai) a kan kafofin watsa labarun. Tana da tarihin yin jita-jita ga kungiyoyi da hukumomi.

Wataƙila Prause ta ciyar da masu shirya taron na ISSM ta saba tarin ƙarya. Misali, ina zargin ta nuna cewa an kai ni rahoto ga Kwamitin Ilimin Ilimin halin dan Adam na Oregon (ba tare da dalili ba) don “yin ilimin halin dan Adam ba tare da lasisi ba.” Na fadi haka ne saboda, ban dade da kammala taron ba, na karba wasika daga hukumar exonerating Ni na yin haka (ba za su iya bayyana wanda ya rubuta kukan ba).

Dr. Prause kuma ya yi kira ga mutane akai-akai, ciki har da watakila masu shirya taron, na riƙe kaina a matsayin farfesa. Wannan kuma ba gaskiya bane. (Duba wannan mahadar don cikakkun bayanai: Ana ci gaba - Yi amfani da ƙaryar ƙarya cewa Wilson ya ɓatar da takardun shaidarsa.) Wataƙila ta taɓa gaya wa waɗanda suka shiryata ƙaryar da ta yi ta maimaitawa cewa ina da umarnin hana ni don lafiyarta, kuma an kai ni rahoto ga FBI. Babu irin wannan umarnin "babu lamba", kuma na riga na bayyana ga jama'a a Rahoto daga FBI ta share ni da tabbatar da yin amfani da shi a matsayin ƙarya. Da ke ƙasa akwai misalai na Fuse na Fabrairu 16, 2019 Twitter-fushi mai alaƙa da Park et al., 2016:

Josh Grubbs yana tallafa wa abokantaka da kwarewa a cikin hare-haren ta'addanci ta yanar-gizon da kuma kuskuren kimiyya (ko nazarinsa):

A wannan rana, NatureReviewsUrology (NRU) an nakalto daga zancen, ba daga takarda ba. Wannan NRU tweet shine wanda ya jawo mafi yawan fushin Twitter daga Dakata da mabiyanta suna kai hari ga takarda, duk da cewa takardar tamu ba ta faɗi haka ba, kuma da gaske ba ta faɗi komai game da jarabar batsa ba. A matsayinsa na gefe, da'awar Prause game da “bayanan ƙarya” ba gaskiya bane kuma ba'a tallafawa su.

Babu takaddun komai, banda kirdadon Prausearfin Prause na rashin tallafi, da'awar ɓatanci, wanda aka buga a waɗannan shafukan:

Gaskiyar ita ce, mai yiwuwa ISSM ba a gayyace ni a matsayin babban mai magana da yawun ba saboda kokarin da ake yi na bayan fage na Prause tare da ita da kuma marubuciya Jim Pfaus (memba na ISSM), wanda ya yi amfani da tasirinsa na dogon lokaci don sakawa kullun zuwa kwamitin ISSM. Kamar yadda ban shiga cikin ɗayan laifin da ake tuhuma ba, Yi wasa a bayyane ya ƙirƙira wasu ƙaryar ƙarya don tsoratar da ISSM (bisa ga tsarin halayenta da aka rubuta a wannan shafin). Hoton tattaunawar Gary Wilson a taron ISSM na 2018 wanda aka gudanar a Fotigal:

Kwamitin ya bukaci in yi magana saboda: (1) Na kasance Park et al., 2016, kuma, (2) Na ba da shahararren TEDx magana, wanda ya shafi ra'ayin ED. A screenshot na kiran gayyatar:

A shafukan sada zumunta, Prause ta bayyana cewa ta soke maganata saboda na gabatar da "takardun bogi." Misali, Tweet's tweet Attack the ESSM talk, kuma ta da'awar cewa ba a gayyaci Gary Wilson ba ne saboda ya "ba da takardun shaida na ƙarya":

Tabbatar da cewa Ra'ayi yana kwance: a cikin bayanan imel, na tunatar da komitin ISSM cewa ba ni da PhD ko MD (duba ƙasa). Duk da haka, kwamitin ya dage cewa na gabatar da har ma da na biya bashin jirgin zuwa Portugal duk da warwarewar (wanda ba a yi shi ba).

Ko da yake yana iya zama abin mamaki cewa wannan kundin tsarin mulki zai shiga cikin irin wannan fasahar, dole ne mu tuna cewa wannan mutumin ne wanda ya ba da rahoton likitoci na likitancin 7 Park et al. zuwa ga kwamitocin kiwon lafiya na jihohin su (kwamitocin sun yi biris da cin zarafin da aka yiwa Prause). Ita ce mutumin da yake da shi an yi ƙarya ga 6 shekaru da ta ruwaito Gary Wilson ga FBI. Mutumin nan wanda yake maimaitawa, ƙarya tweets cewa Fight The New Drug ta fada wa mabiyanta cewa “Dr. Ya kamata a yi fyade ". Mutum daya wanda An kaddamar da tsohon abokin aiki na UCLA, Rory C. Reid PhD, da kuma saki. Wannan mutumin da ya buga labarin a shafin batsa, da'awar da'awar cewa an kori Gary Wilson daga Jami'ar Ore Oregon. Kuma a kan da a kan ya tafi.

Ƙarin tweets da ke kai hare-haren 2019 ESSM da kuma Park et al., 2016:

A'a, COPE ba ya bayar da shawara ba, ko da yake Kodayake ya dame su saboda 3 tsawon shekaru. Da zarar COPE ya fahimci cewa an yarda da dokokin Dokar Navy, duk maganganun sasantawa ya ƙare.

Wani ƙarya game da "jaraba da aka fitar da shi." Bayanai na kwaskwarima irin su DSM da ICD ba su yi amfani da kalmar "jaraba" don bayyana duk wani jaraba: suna amfani da "rashin lafiya." A gaskiya, sabuwar fitowar lafiyar lafiyar lafiyar Lafiya ta Duniya manual, Kwayoyin Tsarin Kasa na Duniya (ICD-11), ya ƙunshi sabon ganewar asali dace don bincikar abin da ake kira "jita-jitar batsa" ko "jima'i jima'i." An kira "Harkokin Rashin Jima'i na Jima'i"(CSBD).

Sashe na farko na wannan ƙaddamarccen bayanin ya nuna shaidar ƙarya ta ƙungiyar ICD-11: Zuwa "Me yasa muke damuwa game da kallon hotunan? ", Da Marty Klein, Taylor Kohut, da kuma Nicole Prause (2018). Don cikakkiyar asusun da aka gano na ICD-11, duba wannan labarin na yanzu game da Ci gaban Harkokin Jima'i (SASH): "Ƙungiyar Harkokin Jima'i ta Haɗaka" ta ƙunshi Ƙungiyar Lafiya ta Duniya a matsayin lafiyar Lafiya ta Mental.

Ƙari mafi yawa na magana ta 2019ESSM:

Yi wasa da Ley - kamar yadda kullun, suna kare batsa da ƙarfi masana'antun batsa.

Ba tare da wani takamaiman dalili ba, Prause ta sake tallata labarin karya game da sake yin amfani da fim ɗin game da Park et al (3-1-19):

Gunawa ya ci gaba, lafazin jaridar Behavioral Sciences:

Cyber- hargitsi.

Daga cikin shuɗi, Kiɗa Tweets farmaki kan MDPI: Ƙididdigar da Norwegian Register ta ƙaddamar da shi ta ƙaddamarwa shi ne kuskuren kuskure, wanda aka gyara a baya. Duba bayani na shafin MDPI Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:MDPI#Reply_1-APR-2019

Kuna yi saninsa da gaskiya da dama daga cikin sunayensa na karya sun gyara rubutun MDPI Wikipedia, shigar da sababin sa na yaudara.

Hanya zuwa fasalin gyara yana nuna cewa MDPI ba ta rage daraja ba. Wannan shine dalilin da ya sa Prause ba ta haɗi zuwa shafin a cikin tweet ba. Screenshot a kasa:

Kwana biyu daga baya Gidan wasan kwaikwayon da aka yi amfani da su a tarihin tsohuwar tarihin Gary Gary ya gyara Josh Grubbs. Tweets wannan kamfani mai ladabi:

Wannan alama ce ta 4 shekaru masu rikice-rikicen cyber-hargitsi da lalacewa.

Afrilu, 2019, David Ley ya shiga Nikky a cikin lalata Park et al., 2016:

Ley ba ya amsa da wani abu don kare abin da yake karya.

Afrilu 27, 2019. Trolling wani bazuwar launi don uzuri don yada ƙarya ƙarya:

Kamar yadda aka fada akwai masanin kimiyya guda daya tak ", Yi amfani da shi. Kuma a'a, babu karatun 8 na tabbatarwa.

----

Yuli, 2019 - Tana sake kunna tweeting, azaman Wikipedia mai yiwuwa Proused sockpuppet sakawa wannan bayanin a cikin MDPI Wikipedia.

Hanya zuwa fasalin gyara yana nuna cewa MDPI ba a kashe shi ba a 2019 (kuskuren kuskure ne da aka gyara). Yayin da la'akari na 2020 na iya kasancewa kuskure, littafin Norwegian ya nuna "0" - amma "ba a sake" ba. Yi la'akari da cewa Prause yana ƙoƙari ya yaudare jama'a ta hanyar tweeting hotunan kariyar 2 na ratings; wanda tare da 2020 kawai, da kuma bayanan hoto na 2019 kuskure wanda aka gyara a baya. Fuskantar hotunan kariya:

Na farko nuna kawai 2020

Na biyu ya nuna kuskuren da ba a yi ba:

Gunawa yana kwance game da kwatancin 2019 na MDPI, kamar yadda aka gani a cikin hoto na bayanan kwanan nan:

Kullum tare da Prause ta yaudara tweet a "Sabon" Wikipedia abin ya shafa sakawa Dalili na 2020 a cikin shafin Wikipedia.

Franck Vazquez, Ph.D. (Babban jami'in kimiyya na MDPI) ya kira Sallah a kwance:

Ya bayyana cewa za a daidaita ma'aunin 2020 a farkon shekara.

A cikin martani, Prause ya buga tsohuwar watan 3-wata Frank Vasquez tweet:

An kama Prause a wata karyar game da ma'aunin Yaren mutanen Norway. Hanya madaidaiciya ga shafi na ma'auni na kowane ɗan jarida: https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/VedtakNiva1. Binciki MDPI kuma zaka ga cewa duk mujallolin suna da darajar “1”, gami da Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, inda Park et al., An buga 2016.

--------

Agusta, 2019: Prause da David Ley ƙungiyar sun tashi yin ƙarya game da Park et al,. Nan da nan Ley ta amsa tare da bata sunan - da'awar marubutan sun biya Park et al., 2016 da aka buga:

Gary Wilson gyara ƙaryar Ley:

Nicole Farko tweets ta ƙarya , da'awar marubutan 8 an "biya su don kira shi jaraba".

Anan ta sake komawa, karkashin tweet guda:

Kamar yadda Shugaba na MDPI yayi bayani, ainihin ma'auni yana faruwa a cikin 2020.

KYAUTA (2020): kamar yadda kake gani, MDPI koyaushe ana kimanta shi azaman # 1 - (kuma Pramu ya kasance koyaushe yana kwance game da ƙimar MDPI):

————————————————————————————

Prause da Ley sharhi a karkashin Agusta, 2016 Psychology Yau blog post daga Mark Castleman. Labarin Castleman ya cika da wasu bayanan karya game da hakan Park et al., 2016 da Grubbs da Gola, 2016. Castleman yayi karya game da yourbrainonporn.com, yana ikirarin muna bata karatu ko kuma lissafin karatun banza kamar kowane nayasayer amma ya kasa bada misali guda daya na rashin fahimta. Har ila yau, ya kasance a cikin gabatarwa game da abin da YBOP ya ce game da lalata batutuwan ED. Duk abin da ya ce game da Park et al. ƙarya ne: abubuwan da ke ciki, da'awarta, abin da ta mai da hankali a kansu, nazarin al'amuran, ƙididdigar, kun ambace shi. Wannan bai kamata ya zama abin mamaki ba kamar yadda Castleman ya buga labarai da yawa don tallafawa masana'antar batsa (duk son zuciya da kimiyya ba daidai ba). Shi ba mai bincike ba ne ko kuma mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali, ɗan jarida ne kawai mai manufa. Labaran Castleman suma sun inganta realyourbrainonporn.com a matsayin tushen gaskiya game da tasirin batsa. Akwai karancin shakku game da irin rawar da Prause da Ley ke takawa cikin abin da ya kunsa a halin yanzu.

Da farko jawabin Ley:

'Yan tsokaci game da ƙaryar Ley da juyawa.

LEY - An buga shi a cikin jarida mara kyau sosai a ƙarƙashin yanayi mai ban mamaki.

Kwararren havwararrun Pubwararrun Pubabi'a an buga su, ba kamar mujallu waɗanda suka karɓi ra'ayoyin Ley na 2 ba (misali Jaridar Nazarin Batsa, Rahoton Kiwon Lafiyar Jima'i na Yanzu).

LEY - Babu ɗayan marubutan da ke da ƙwarewa game da lafiyar jima'i, ko ilimin jima'i kuma da yawa daga cikin likitan ido ne?

Ley na al'ada. Daga cikin marubutan takwas sun kasance likitoci bakwai tare da ƙwararrun masu zuwa: likitan urologists biyu, masanin ilimin ƙwaƙwalwa, da likitan kwakwalwa biyu, da kuma babban likita. ”Wani marubuci, Dokta Klam, Daraktan Kiwan Lafiya na Cibiyar Nazarin Naval - San Diego. Amma ga likitan likitan ido, Dokta Doan duka MD ne kuma PhD (Neuroscience - Johns Hopkins), tsohon shugaban "ictionsarfafa Magunguna ne da Nazarin Cutar da Magunguna" a Sashen Lafiyar Hauka a Cibiyar Nazarin Naval. Baya ga takardu a kan batsa ta hanyar intanet, Doan ya wallafa takardu da yawa kan jarabar halayyar / maganganun da suka shafi fasahar zamani, (ya buga karatuttukan masu sahihancin karatu kafin ya kammala daga makarantar sakandare).

LEY - Binciken likita da aka bayyana a cikin labarin Park suna da matukar damuwa. A cikin binciken shari'ar farko, marubutan sun bayyana cewa sun sanar da mai haƙuri cewa "amfani da abin wasa na jima'i na iya lalata jijiyoyin azzakarin sa," wata sanarwa mai ban mamaki da mara tallafi don bugawa, ba tare da binciken urological ba.

Ley yana tsammanin yana da haɓaka ga likitoci su ba da shawarar yin watsi da abin wasan yara da batsa (duk da cewa matuƙin jirgin ruwan yana da matsananciyar damuwa game da wasan yara / wasan batsa). Wani sharhi da aka gabatar daga rahoton-karar da aka fallasa shawarar Ley a matsayin zalunci:

Aikin 20 mai aiki na aiki ya shiga ma'aikacin Caucasian wanda aka gabatar da matsalolin samun halayen lokacin haɗuwa don watanni shida da suka gabata. Ya fara faru yayin da aka tura shi waje. Ya fara dashi don kimanin sa'a daya ba tare da wani motsa jiki ba, kuma azzakarinsa ya tafi. Matsalolinsa na ci gaba da yin gyare-gyare da kuma ci gaba da haɗari sun ci gaba a duk lokacin da yake aiki. Tun dawowarsa, bai kasance cikin damar yin jima'i ba tare da abokin aurensa. Zai iya yin ginawa amma ba zai iya yin amfani da shi ba, kuma bayan 10-15 min zai rasa haɗinsa, wanda ba haka ba ne kafin ya sami abubuwan ED. Wannan ya haifar da matsala a cikin dangantakarsa da marigayinsa.

Mai haƙuri ya amince da al'aura kamar yadda akeyi "shekaru", kuma sau ɗaya ko sau biyu kusan kullun don shekarun da suka gabata. Ya ba da goyon baya ga kallon batsa na Intanet don motsawa. Tun lokacin da ya sami damar yin amfani da yanar gizo mai tsayi, ya dogara ne kawai da batsa ta yanar gizo. Da farko, "batsa mai laushi", inda abun cikin ba dole bane ya hada da ainihin ma'amala, "yaudarar". Koyaya, sannu a hankali ya buƙaci ƙarin hoto ko ɗan hoto don kawowa. Ya ba da rahoton buɗe bidiyo da yawa a lokaci guda kuma yana kallon sassan da suka fi ƙarfafawa. Lokacin da yake shirin tura shi kimanin shekara daya da suka gabata, ya damu matuka game da kasancewarsa abokiyar zama. Don haka, ya sayi abin wasan yara na jima'i, wanda ya bayyana a matsayin "farjin karya". Wannan na'urar ta fara motsawa sosai har ta kai inzali a cikin minti.

A hankali, ba shi da tarihin rashin lafiya, tiyata, ko kuma maganin lafiyar jiki. Bai dauki magunguna ko kari ba. Ya ƙaryata game da amfani da kayan taba amma sha wasu sha a cikin jam'iyyun sau ɗaya ko sau biyu a wata. Ya taba shan taba daga shan barasa. Ya bayar da rahotanni ga abokan jima'i da yawa da suka wuce, amma tun lokacin da yake da albashinsa a shekara guda, matarsa ​​ta kasance abokin aurenta. Ya ƙaryata game da tarihin cututtukan cututtuka da ake yi da jima'i. A jarrabawar jiki, alamunsa masu mahimmanci sun kasance al'ada, kuma jarrabawar jima'i ya kasance bayyanar jiki ba tare da raunuka ko masarau ba.

A ƙarshen ziyarar, an bayyana masa cewa amfani da abin wasa na jima'i ya zama sanadin rage girman jijiyoyinsa da kallon kallon batsa na Intanet sun canza bakin sa don motsawar jima'i. An shawarce shi da ya daina amfani da abin wasa da kallon wasan bidiyo na batsa. An kira shi zuwa urology don ƙarin kimantawa.

A lokacin da masanin ilimin uro ya gan shi 'yan makonni kadan, ya datse amfani da batsa na Intanet ta amfani da shi sosai, kodayake ya ce ba zai iya tsayawa gaba ɗaya ba. Ya daina amfani da abin wasa. Yana sake samun yardar juna ta hanyar ma'amala da budurwarsa, kuma dangantakar su ta inganta.

Evidencearin shaidar cewa Ley yakamata ta bayar da shawarar jima'i.

Bayanin da wani baƙon Prause ya yi (ba ta yi istibra'i ba kamar kanta yayin da ta shiga cikin shari'oin 2 kamar na watan Agusta, 2016):

Sharhi mara kyau kamar Park et al., 2016 ba bincike bane, amma nazari ne. Kamar yadda aka fallasa a shafin na yanzu, Gunaguni yana kwance game da matsalolin ɗabi'a da rahoton shari'ar. Amma me kuke tsammani daga masanin yanar gizo na MDPI?

Wani sharhi da wani wanda ake kira Prause wanda aka ce masa:

Kamar yadda ke sama, Park ta bita ce, don haka ba ta gabatar da bayanan gwaji ba. Koyaya, ya ƙunshi babban bayanai a duk faɗin kuma nassoshi na 200.

------


Mayu 24-27, 2018 - Yin amfani da kirkirar kirkirar tsana da yawa don shirya shafin MDPI Wikipedia (kuma an dakatar da shi ne don sock-puppetry & defamation)

a wani farkon ɓangare mun sake ba da labarin yadda Prause ta musgunawa MDPI da mujallarta Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa. Har ila yau, mun rubuta tarihin tarihin amfani da sunayen masu amfani na bogi da yawa akan Wikipedia (wanda ya keta dokokinta) don tursasa yawancin mutane ko kungiyoyin da aka lissafa a wannan shafin. Misali:

Kwancen Wikipedia da aka yi amfani da shi ya faru ne daga 24 ga Mayu zuwa 27th kuma ya ƙunshi aƙalla sunayen masu amfani na 6 na jabu (waɗanda ake kira “sock-puppets” a cikin Wikipedia jargon). Hanyoyin masu zuwa suna daukar ku zuwa duk gyare-gyaren waɗannan sunayen masu amfani na musamman (“gudummawar mai amfani”):

  1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Suuperon
  2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/NeuroSex
  3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Defender1984
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/23.243.51.114
  5. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/185.51.228.243
  6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/209.194.90.6

Sunaye na farko huɗu sunaye sunaye na MDPI Wikipedia, yayin da 3 na 6 ya shirya Nofap Wikipedia shafi, da Yin jima'i shafi da Shafin yanar-gizon batsa. Dukkan shafuka na 3 suna kallo ne na Gida. Ko da Wikipedia ya san sunayen mai amfani kamar yadda yake na mutum ɗaya saboda an dakatar da sunaye don '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '' '. Za mu iya tabbatar da cewa an yi amfani dasu don gyara shafin MDPI saboda:

1) Sabuwar imel tsakanin MDPI da Nicole Prause sun fara a ranar Mayu 22, tare da MDPI yana sanar da duk wadanda ke da wannan gyara ta fasaha da kuma yadda editan zai zama mai zuwa. Wannan fushin da aka yi wa Mutumin da ya amsa ya amsa da buƙata da barazanar, ya biyo bayan zarge-zargen ƙarya da kai hare-hare.

2) An gyara tare da mai amfani NeuroSex wanda kawai ya shirya kafin Mayu 24th wani ƙoƙari ne mara nasara don samun wasu shafukan shafin Wikipedia zuwa ga Shafin yanar gizo Wikipedia Nicole (Fabrairu, 2018). Daga NeuroSex magana shafi:

Barka da zuwa Wikipedia. Kodayake kowa yana maraba da taimakawa wajen ingantaccen kundin gado, bugu da kari ɗaya ko fiye da haɗin waje zuwa shafin Nicole Farko An sake dawo da shi.

3) Abubuwan da ke cikin Wikipedia sun ta'allaka ne ga ɗayan abubuwan da ke gudana na Prause: ƙyama da yunƙurin janye takardar da Gary Wilson da likitocin Navy na Amurka suka rubuta: Shin Intanit Intanit yana haifar da Dysfunctions? A Review tare da Clinical Reports (Park et al., 2016)

4) Dukkanin gyare-gyare na Wikipedia sunyi amfani da nau'in tweets da imel zuwa MDPI (wanda Wilson ya gani).

5) Kuskoki masu tatsuniya suna da'awar suna da imel na MDPI masu zaman kansu - wanda suke so su aika zuwa shafin MDPI Wikipedia. Ga abin da NeuroSex ya ce a cikin sharhinta. (Lura: A cikin imel ɗin ta na lokaci daya zuwa MDPI, Yi amfani da cc'd SakamakowaShirarwa, a fili don barazana ga MDPI tare da karɓar fansa.):

Ina da hotunan da ke tabbatar da duk wata ikirarin (misali, imel daga mai wallafa, imel ɗin daga editan da aka jera, da dai sauransu). RetractionWatch da wasu kantuna suna la'akari rubuta reviews na shi da, amma ba zan iya tabbata wadanda za materialize. Yaya mafi kyau don samar da irin wannan shaidar da ke tabbatar da ƙidodin? Kamar yadda aka sanya hoto? An rubuta wani wuri tare da hotuna da nasaba?

Bari mu kawo wasu 'yan misalai na gyaran "NeuroSex" (karya) masu alaka da Gary Wilson da kuma zuwa Park et al., 2016 - bayan bayanan Wilson:

NeuroSex gyara #1: Gary Wilson ya kasance {{cite yanar gizo | take = an biya sama da fam 9000 | url =https://www.oscr.org.uk/downloadfile.aspx?id=160223&type=5&charityid=SC044948&arid=236451}} Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici don shiga cikin Amurka a madadin maganganun da ke nuna alamun batsa.

Wilson yayi sharhi: NeuroSex ya haɗu da wani daftarin aiki da aka sake gyara, yana mai iƙirarin cewa an ba Gary Wilson fam 9,000 ta charityungiyar agaji ta Scotish The Reward Foundation. Kwana biyu da suka gabata Yi amfani da karyar ƙarya ga MDPI mai wallafa mujallar (da sauransu) cewa, gwargwadon shigar da bayanan sadaka da aka gabatar a kwanan nan (tare da sunan da aka sake sabuntawa, kamar yadda yake daidai), an sake biyan kuɗin da aka biya ga jami'in sadaka ga Wilson. Gwadawa bai bincika gaskiyarta ba, kuma tayi kuskure (sake). Wilson bai taɓa karɓar kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako ba. Gary Wilson ya gabatar da da'awar Prause ga Darryl Mead, Shugaban Gidauniyar Taimako. Amsarsa tana sama:

Daga: Ladan Gidauniya[email kariya]>
An Aika: Alhamis, Mayu 24, 2018 8:17 AM
Zuwa: gary wilson
Take: Re: Damuwa da hankalin Nicole Prause ya jawo hankalin COPE. Manuscript ID na halin-133116

Masoyi Gary:

Na duba cikin wannan. Yi aiki ya ce:

 On 22/05/2018 20:48, Nicole Prause ta rubuta:
> Ya bayyana cewa Wilson ya karɓi kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako. A haɗe shine Rahoton Gidauniyar Gidauniyar Taimako. Kowane abu C6 yana nufin tafiya wanda ke bayanin tafiyar Gary Wilson wanda yakai fam 9,027.
>
> Ina neman duk wani gyara ya haɗa da wannan COI na kuɗi, ko a keɓe lokaci don nuna yadda yakamata cewa wannan ba rikici bane na sha'awa.
>
> Nicole Prause, Ph.D. Liberoshttp://www.liberoscenter.com>

Wannan ishara ne ga Lissafin Shekarar mu na 2016-17. An buga wani nau'in asusun tare da sake fasalin asali ta Ofishin Mai Kula da Sadaka na Scottish kuma ana iya zazzage shi a https://www.oscr.org.uk/search/charity-details?number=SC044948#results, kwafa a haɗe. OSCR ne ke aiwatar da wannan aikin sake ba tare da shigarwar daga sadaka mai suna ba.

Sashin da ya dace tare da sake gyarawa ya karanta kamar yadda wannan hoton allon yake.

Mutumin da aka ambata a cikin C6 shine Darryl Mead, Shugaban Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici. Ni ne mutumin kuma na yi iƙirarin a biya ni kuɗin tafiya da sauran buƙata.

Takardar asali ta karanta kamar haka:

Babu wata magana game da Gary Wilson a cikin kowane ɓangare na kuɗin don Gidauniyar Taimako saboda babu biyan kuɗi a gare shi.

Tare da fatan alheri,

Darryl Mead

A taƙaice, Yi amfani da ƙarya ga Wilson game da karɓar kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako. Daga nan sai ta yada karairayinta ga MDPI, COPE, SakamakowaShirarwa, da sauransu, ta yin amfani da takaddar da aka sake sabuntawa da ta gabatar (kamar dai yadda NeuroSex ta yi wa Wikipedia ƙarya a yunƙurin da ta gaza na karɓar gyare-gyaren da ke da nasaba da ita).

Sabuntawa, 6-7-18: Ba tare da wani dalili ba musamman da ban sanya ba kuma babu wanda ya ambaci aikin na ko ya ambace ni, Yi amfani da hoto ya gabatar da sharhi ICD-11 game da Gary Wilson (dole ne ƙirƙirar sunan mai amfani don duba tsokaci). A cikin wannan sharhi Prause ta maimaita wannan karyar da ta gabata a cikin musayar imel tare da MDPI, RetractionWatch, da COPE (kuma akan Wikipedia):

A cikin 'yan kwanaki masu zuwa Nicole Prause ta sanya 4 ƙarin maganganu masu banƙyama a kan ICD-11 da ke kai hari ga Gary Wilson kuma yana ci gaba da ƙaryar ƙarya cewa shi ma'aikaci ne mai biyan kuɗi na Gidauniyar Taimako. Darryl Mead, Shugaban Gidauniyar Taimako, daga baya ya ba da amsa:

Kamar yadda ake tsammani, Amincewa ya amsa tare da ƙarin ƙaryar da kai hare-hare na sirri.

Sabuntawa, 6-18-18: Yi aiki ƙirƙirar wani sunan mai amfani na Wikipedia don shirya shi MDPI wikipedia shafi - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/185.51.228.245 - kuma ya kara da wadannan:

A cikin 2016, wani mujallar MDPI, Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, buga wata takarda ta bita da'awar batsa ta haifar erectile tabarbarewa. Masana kimiyya shida sun sami damar tuntuɓar MDPI game da damfara da sauran batutuwa a cikin labarin, ƙaddamar da nazari mai zaman kansa ta Kwamitin Etha'awar Bayanai (COPE). COPE ya ba da shawarar janye labarin.[31] Editan jaridar da aka lissafa, Scott Lane, ya musanta kasancewa editan. Don haka, takarda ta bayyana ba a yi ta-sake dubawa ba. Bugu da ari, marubuta biyu suna da rikice-rikice masu ban sha'awa. Garyungiyar Gary Wilson tare da Gidauniyar Reward ba ta bayyana shi da kyau kamar yadda mai gwagwarmaya, ƙungiyar yaƙi da batsa ba.

Har ila yau, Wilson ya wallafa a kafafen sada zumunta cewa "Navy na Amurka" ne ya gudanar da binciken, duk da cewa asalin takardar ta ce ba ta yi daidai da ra'ayoyin Sojojin ruwan na Amurka ba. Sauran mawallafin, Dokta Andrew Doan, masanin ido ne wanda ke gudanar da ma'aikatar yaki da batsa ta Real Real Filin wasa, yana neman gudummawa don maganarsu.[32] Bugu da ari, Kwamitin da'a kan yada labarai ya yanke hukuncin cewa shari'ar ba ta dace ba, an yarda da dabi'a don hadawa. - MDPI ta ba da gyara ga wasu daga cikin waɗannan batutuwan,[33] amma ya ƙi sanya gyaran ga wasu zuwa yau kamar yadda Retraction Watch ya bayyana.[31]

Da yawa daga cikin karyar da aka samo:

  1. Babu masanan kimiyya 6 - kawai Fuskantar da aka tuntuɓi MDPI.
  2. An bayyana haɗin kaina tare da Gidauniyar Taimako daga farkon. Kamar yadda aka bayyana a baya, alaƙar ta da Gidauniyar Taimako (TRF) koyaushe a bayyane take, duka a farkon Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa labarin da kuma a cikin gyare-gyare na baya (da asali na PubMed). Dalilin da sabuntawa da aka buga ya yi wa Dr. Prause's incessant damuwa ikirarin zarge-zarge cewa na sami kuɗi daga TRF, kuma ina samun kuɗi daga littafina (kudadena wanda a zahiri, zuwa sadaka)
  3. Na buga cewa takardar ta shafi likitocin Ruwan Amurka 7. Rundunar Sojan Ruwa ba ta da matsala game da maganata.
  4. Dokta Andrew Doan duka MD da PhD ne (Neuroscience - Johns Hopkins), shi ne tsohon Shugaban “Binciken Addini da juriya” a Sashen Kiwan Lafiya a Cibiyar Kiwon Lafiya ta Naval. (Tun daga lokacin an canja shi kuma an haɓaka shi, kuma yana da nauyi daban-daban.) Doan ya wallafa takardu da yawa game da jarabar ɗabi'a / cututtukan da suka shafi fasaha (a wasu lokuta tare da marubucin marubucin takardar da kuka rubuta game da nan). A takaice dai, kwararren marubuci ne. Waɗannan sauran takaddun za a iya samun su a nan: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=doan+klam. Rashin ribarsa, Real Battlefield Ministries (RBM), bai tattauna batsa ba kafin a buga takardar. Ko da RBM ya gabatar akan batsa ba zai zama rikici na sha'awa ba.
  5. Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama, shawarar COPE ta zato ce kawai kuma bai shafi takaddarmu ba kamar yadda likitocin Navy na Amurka suka fi bin cibiyoyin Kula da Lafiya Naval - Dokokin yarda da IRB na San Diego. Manufar IRB ta Cibiyar Kiwon Lafiya ta San Diego ba la'akari da rahotanni game da kasa da marasa lafiya hudu a cikin wata kasida don zama binciken mutum ba kuma baya buƙatar marasa lafiya su yarda su shiga a cikin wani labarin. Kodayake ba a buƙatar masu binciken su sami izini ba, don lamura biyu, an sami magana da rubutaccen yarda. A cikin na uku inda da alama ba za a iya ɓata suna ba, ba a sami rubutaccen izinin ba. Ba zato ba tsammani, a kan dagewar Dokta Prause, bayan da aka buga takarda, an sake nazarin ayyukan marubutan Navy game da wannan takarda sosai a cikin binciken Navy mai zaman kansa. Sakamakon? Ina da kwafin rahoton da wani lauya na Navy ya bayar da tabbacin cewa masu marubuta sun bi duk dokokin IRB.

A cikin rantsuwar rantsuwa da aka gabatar a Kotun Tarayya, Gary Wilson ya bayyana cewa Prause (1) ya yi amfani da shaidar ƙarya (Janey Wilson) don ɓata sunan Wilson da mai wallafa shi, da kuma The Reward Foundation, (2) a cikin imel, da Wikipedia, da a cikin maganganun jama'a lokacin da suke faɗin cewa Gary Wilson ya karɓi diyyar kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako

Prausearya da tashin hankali na Prause sun kama ta.

Kamar yadda aka bayyana sosai a cikin sashin da ya gabata Gary Wilson donates da kudin daga littafinsa ga Gidauniyar Talla. Wilson bai karɓi kuɗi ba, kuma bai taɓa karɓi tsaran tsaran tsaran ƙoƙarinsa ba. YBOP bai yarda da wani talla ba kuma Wilson bai yarda da wasu kudade na magana ba. Kamar yadda aka tsara a cikin wadannan sassan, Prause ya gina labari mai ban al'ajabi wanda ke ba da kyautar Wilson ta hanyar sadaka da ya bayar don bayar da littafin sa:

A zahiri, wannan ba gaskiya bane. Wadannan sassan biyu da ke sama an yi maganarsu a rantsuwar rantsar da Gary Wilson, wanda wani bangare ne na karar batanci da Dakta Hilton ya shigar da Dokta Prause.

A cikin rantsuwar rantsuwa da aka gabatar a Kotun Tarayya, Gary Wilson ya bayyana (a karkashin azabar rantsuwar rantsuwa) cewa (1) Nicole Prause ta yi amfani da shaidar karya (Janey Wilson) don bata sunan Wilson da wallafa shi, da Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici, (2) cewa Yi aiki da ƙarya a cikin imel, akan Wikipedia da kuma cikin maganganun jama'a yayin faɗin cewa Gary Wilson ya karɓi diyyar kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako.

Duba cikakkiyar rantsuwa: Yuli, 2019: Tabbacin Gary Wilson: Laifin cin amanar Donald Hilton da Nicole R Prause & Liberos LLC. Abubuwan da suka dace daga rantsuwar rantsuwa da Gary Wilson, wanda ɓangare ne na Takardar karar cin mutuncin Dr. Hilton da aka gabatar a kan Dr. Prause.

A taƙaice, Nicole Prause ta tsunduma cikin ɓatanci a kan Wilson da Dr. Hilton. Baya ga Wilson, 8 sauran wadanda aka yiwa fyaden sun gabatar da rantsuwa a kotu wanda ke bayyana batanci, tursasawa, da kuma bayar da rahoto mara kyau ga hukumomi da hukumomi (kawai da Prause kankara).


Yi amfani da ƙarya game da Gary Wilson a cikin imel zuwa MDPI, David Ley, Neuro Skeptic, Adam Marcus na Sakamako Watch, da COPE (Mayu, 2018)

A watan Mayu, musayar imel na 2018 tare da MDPI & COPE, Yi amfani da kofe-kofen yanar gizo waɗanda aka tsara don lalata martabar MDPI a cikin kafofin watsa labarai, idan sun zaɓa. Ley blogs a kan Psychology yau kuma sau da yawa ya yi aiki a matsayin Maɗaukaki. Neuro Skeptic yana da shahararren blog da ke ɓatar da bincike-bincike (kuma wani lokaci). Adam Marcus ya rubuta don Sake jan hankali Watch. Yi aiki kuma an kwafa Iratxe Puebla, wanda ke aiki don COPE, ƙungiyar da ke magance ɗabi'ar ɗabi'a. Tuni, Adam Marcus na karyata Watch ya ɗauki koto ba tare da cikakken bincike ba.

A cikin labaran ta na batanci, tweets, da Quora posts Prause da gangan kuma na ƙaryata cewa ni (Gary Wilson) na yi iƙirarin zama “farfesa a ilmin halitta” "likita" ko "masanin ilmin lissafi." Na kasance Malami a Adjunct a Kudancin Oregon University kuma na koyar da ilimin halittar jikin dan adam, ilimin kimiyyar lissafi da ilimin dabbobi a wasu wuraren. Kodayake 'yan jarida da shafukan yanar gizo marasa kulawa sun sanya min lamuran lakabi cikin kuskure tsawon shekaru (gami da wani shafi da aka daina amfani da shi yanzu a shafin yanar gizo cewa masu satar fasaha suna tattaunawa da TEDx da yawa kuma suna bayanin masu magana ba tare da tuntuɓar su ba) A koyaushe ina bayyana cewa na koyar da ilimin jikin mutum ilimin lissafi. Ban taba cewa ina da PhD ba ko kuma farfesa ne. Yi aiki ya faɗi wannan ƙaryar ga masu karɓar imel:

SABODA EMAIL # 1 (5-1-2018)

A ranar Talata, Mayu 1, 2018 a 10:11 PM, Nicole Prause >

Bugu da ƙari, Mista Wilson yanzu yana amfani da wannan littafin don da'awar ya zama likita a kan layi ga marasa lafiya marasa lafiya (haɗe).

NP

Nicole Prause, Ph.D. Kamfanin Liberos LLC: www

Da ke ƙasa akwai hoton hoton da ake amfani da shi don “tabbatar” cewa na yi kuskuren gabatar da takardun shaidata (kuma, wannan shafin na Gary Wilson ya daina kasancewa). Lura: Har sai da Prause ta samar da "hujja", ban taɓa ganin wannan rukunin yanar gizon ba kuma ban taɓa sadarwa tare da masu masaukinsa ba, ban taɓa shigar da shafin da ake tambaya ba kuma ban taɓa cire shi ba. Ta haka ne hakika ban taɓa ba da labarin rayuwa ba, ko iƙirarin “farfesa.”

Na koyar a Jami’ar Kudancin Oregon sau biyu. Na kuma koyar da ilmin jikin dan adam, ilimin kimiyyar lissafi da ilimin lissafi a wasu makarantu a tsawon shekaru XNUMX, kuma an tabbatar da ni in koyar da wadannan fannoni ta bangaren ilimi na Oregon da California. Ba na neman haɗin magana kuma ban taɓa karɓar kuɗi don magana ba. Bugu da ƙari, YBOP ba ya karɓar talla, kuma kuɗin daga littafina je zuwa sadaka mai rajista.

On shafin "game da" shafin yanar gizo na Keynotes.org ya bayyana cewa ba wata hukuma ce ba kuma cewa kowa zai iya adana bidiyo da mai magana da bidiyo: Keynotes.org ba hukuma ba ce, a'a, shafin yanar gizo media. Keynotes.org an tara shi kuma an ƙara rura wutar ta TrendHunter.com, babban gidan yanar sadarwar yanar gizo mai hangen nesa. Bugu da ƙari, Ban taɓa sanya komai a shafin ba, kuma ban san wanda ya loda wannan shafin ba (ko ya ba da umarnin cire shi ba).

Don haka, yana yiwuwa ma Yi amfani da lodin wannan shafin, tare da maganata na TEDx da kyakkyawar ma'ana ta halitta, don ƙirƙirar “shaidar” da take buƙata na ɓata gari - sannan a cire ta. Bayan 5 shekaru na ci gaba da hargitsi da kuma cyber-stalking, takardun faked, sassaucin ra'ayi, daruruwan tweets, Da kuma da yawa sunayen masu amfani tare da daruruwan bayanai, ba abin mamaki ba.

Hoton allo da ke sama ya kasance wani ɓangare na Labari mafi girma ta Yin amfani inda ta yi da'awar cewa an kore ni daga Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon: Maris, 2018 - Da'awar loauna cewa an kori Gary Wilson. A cikin labarinta, wanda aka sanya shi a shafin da ya shafi batsa da Quora, Prause ta buga sigogi da aka sake fasalta na Kundin aikin jami'ar Kudancin Oregon, ta hanyar karyar cewa an kore ni kuma ban taba koyarwa a SOU ba. Kamar yadda yake da'awarta game da Gidauniyar Taimako, Fuskanci ya yi ƙarya game da ainihin abin da ke cikin takardun da aka sake gyara. Af, David Ley shima yayi rubutun a rubuce sau da yawa a littafin Prause, yana cewa an kore ni daga SOU (hotunan kariyar kwamfuta a shafi).

A ƙarshe, An dakatar da Prause daga Quora har abada saboda tsoratar da ni da kuma shafin yanar gizo na batsa sun cire labarin cin mutuncin Prause.

------

A cikin imel zuwa MDPI, COPE, Ley, Neuroskeptic, Adam Marcus na karyata Watch da sauransu Yin wasa da da'awar ƙarya cewa na karɓi kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako.

SABODA EMAIL # 2 (5-22-2018)

Liberoshttp://www.liberoscenter.com> A ranar 22/05/2018 20:48, Nicole Prause ta rubuta:

Ya bayyana cewa Wilson ya karɓi kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako. A haɗe shine Rahoton Gidauniyar Gidauniyar Taimako. A kowane abu C6 yana nufin tafiya wanda ke bayanin tafiyar Gary Wilson wanda yakai fam 9,027.

Ina roƙon cewa duk wani gyara ya haɗa da wannan COI na kuɗi, ko a keɓe lokaci don nuna yadda ya dace cewa wannan ba rikici ba ne na sha'awa.

Nicole Prause, Ph.D. Liberos

Gwadawa bai bincika gaskiyarta ba, kuma tayi kuskure. Ban taɓa karɓar kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako ba. Na gabatar da da'awar Prause ga Darryl Mead, Shugaban Gidauniyar Taimako, wanda ya warware ikirarin Prause: Duba Sama Don Bayanai.

------

SABODA EMAIL # 3 (5-22-2018)

A cikin imel da yawa ga MDPI (da sauransu), Prause ta ambaci "sukar 77" kuma ta yi da'awar ƙarya cewa ba a magance su ba. Wannan shi ne kawai sabo:

A ranar Talata, Mayu 22, 2018 a 9:36 AM, Nicole Prause>

Na bayar da sharhi na nuna ra'ayi na 77 kafin a buga shi, gaskiya ne ga jerin labaran MDPI da aka bayyana, an yi watsi da su.

Nicole Prause, Ph.D. Kamfanin Liberos LLC: www

Wannan yana nufin An yi amfani da Prause daya daga cikin masu dubawa biyu na Yale Journal of Biology da Medicine biyayya - kuma ta haka ne "Janey Wilson." Kamar yadda aka bayyana, da yawa daga cikin matsalolin 77 da ake kira matsaloli ba tare da kulawa ba an kwafa su kuma an manna su daga binciken da Prause ya yi game da YJBM biyayya; 25 daga cikinsu ba shi da wani abu da ya yi Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa biyayya. A wata ma'anar, mai bita kawai don yin Allah wadai da jaridar ya yanke kuma ya lika yawancin suka daga binciken da aka yi a wani jarida (YJBM), wanda ba shi da wani mahimmanci ga takarda da aka gabatar zuwa Kimiyya mai zurfi. Wannan ba shi da cikakken amfani.

Koda banda wannan rashin daidaituwa, ƙananan matsalar 77 za a iya la'akari da halatta. Duk da haka, zamu yi amfani da hankali ta kowane sharhi don yin amfani da hanyoyi masu amfani, kuma ya rubuta cikakken amsa ga duk abubuwan da suka dace Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa da kuma editocin ta. Kusan dukkanin sauran maganganun 50 masu mahimmanci sun kasance ba daidai ba ne a kimiyance, ba shi da tushe, ko kuma maganganun ƙarya ne kawai. Wasu sun maimaita. Mawallafa sun ba MDPI da ma'ana ta hanyar mayar da martani ga kowane abin da ake kira matsala.


Ayyukan "Janey Wilson" (Yin amfani)

Duba kwafin ainihin imel a ƙasa da wannan taƙaitawar.

Jimawa ba bayan littafina An buga shi a cikin 2015, An rubuta wa mai wallafa don bayani, ta amfani da laƙabi ("Janey Wilson"). Zaton "Janey" ya halatta, Dan Hind na Commonwealth Publishing ya shawarce ta cewa kason nawa na littafin ya tafi Gidauniyar Taimako, wata ƙungiyar agaji ta Scotland (PDF na Nicole Prause sunayen laƙabi da ta kasance don musgunawa & ɓata suna).

“Janey Wilson” nan da nan ta sanar da kungiyar agaji cewa Wilson “yana karyar rike kansa a bainar jama'a kasancewar yana da alaƙa da Gidauniyar Taimako," kuma yana cewa tana da hujja. Hanya guda daya tilo da za ta iya samun “hujja” game da wannan harka ba ta jama'a ba ita ce idan ta ga takardar karatun da na rubuta tare. Aeta ƙa'idar ɗabi'ar ɗabi'a ne don bayyana ko amfani da bayanan da aka koya ta hanyar aikin bita.

Bayanin “Janey” ya kasa fitar da fushin da ake so daga Gidauniyar Taimako (kamar yadda na kasance mai alaƙa da Gidauniyar, ina aiki a matsayin da ba a tantance su ba a matsayin “Jami’in Kimiyyar Daraja Mai Daraja)”. Ba tare da tsoro ba, "Janey" sannan ya ba da rahoton Gidauniyar Taimako ga Mai Kula da Gudanar da Sadaka na Scottish don tunanin kudi da sauran laifuffukan da ake zargi.

Theungiyar sadaka ta kasance sabo da cewa ba a buƙatar yin rajistar kuɗi ba tukunna, don haka ba ma zai yiwu doka ta ba Gidauniyar Taimako ta aikata laifukan rahoton kuɗi da “Janey” ya yi zargi ba.

A kusan lokacin da "Janey" (1) ya rubuta Gidauniyar Taimako don fada mata game da iƙirarin da nake yi na "ƙarya" na alaƙa, kuma (2) ya ba da rahoton sadaka kanta ga Mai Kula da ityungiyar Sadaka ta Scottish, "Janey" kuma ya rubuta kungiyar Edinburgh inda sadaka tana gida tare da da'awar ƙarya game da ni da Gidauniyar Tukuici (duba ƙasa). An kira mahaɗan Edinburgh "Tukunyar narkewa." It'sungiya ce mai ɗaukar nauyin ƙananan masana'antu. "Janey" a bayyane yake a lokaci guda an buga shi game da wannan a kan redddit / batsa batsa dawo da forum - Gary Wilson yana amfana daga YBOP:

Abun da ke sama ba abin mamaki bane kamar yadda Prause ya yi amfani da asalin sock-puppet da yawa don aikawa, da farko kan tattaunawar dawo da batsa, game da Wilson. Don ƙarancin ɗaruruwan maganganu ta hanyar bayyana avatars na Prause a hanyoyin haɗin da ke ƙasa. Kuma, kawai tarin tarin bai cika ba:

Wani post ɗin reddit / mara sa hoto wanda ya bayyana game da lokaci guda (Yi amfani da goge sunan mai amfani da sockpuppet ɗinta, kamar yadda ta saba yi bayan sanyawa):

Janey / Prause sun yi iƙirarin da ba shi da ma'ana cewa ina "biyan kuɗi" Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici don damar tattaunawar TEDx da ta faru shekaru da suka gabata, a cikin 2012. An shirya ta ne a cikin 2011, shekaru kafin a yi tunanin sadaka ko tsara ta. Babu shakka, ba a buƙatar irin wannan ƙaramar ɓarna ba. Ina da 'yancin bayar da littafina ga kowa a kowane wuri, ko sanya su cikin aljihu. Na zabi Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici ne saboda na mutunta daidaitacciyar manufar ta, ilimi.

Babu wata kungiya (mai kula da ayyukan agaji na Scottish ko Melting Pot) da ta ba da amsa ga "Janey," tunda ba ta bayar da wata shaida ba, kuma ba za ta bayyana kanta ba, tana da'awar "matsayin mai fallasa" (duk da cewa, ba shakka, ba ma'aikaciya ba ce , kuma bai kasance cikin barazana ba). Da a ce sadaka ba ta da ƙarfi, mutunta dangantaka tare da Melting Pot, kuma da an riga an buƙaci ta gabatar da bayanan kuɗi tare da Rean Gudanar da ityaunar Scottan Scotland, “iƙirarin Janey” na iya yin ɓarnar da yawa ga martabar sadaka kuma ta fara cin lokaci, duba kudi mai tsada, da dai sauransu.

A ƙarshen 2016, Jirgin ya nuna kanta kamar "Janey Wilson" lokacin da ta bukaci (Dan-Hind na Commonwealth Publishing) tabbatar haɗata da sadaka ta Scottish da ake kira Foundation Reward Foundation don yin aiki a rubuce. Yin kwaskwarimar MDPI (mawallafin mai wallafa na takarda da aka tattauna a baya) da ƙungiyar halayyar wallafe-wallafen (COPE), Gidan ya fadawa Hindu Commonwealth cewa yana Ya riga ya rubuta ta a wannan sakamako.

Koyaya, kawai takaddar Hind ta kasance tare da kowa akan batun Wilson da The Reward Foundation shine tare da "Janey," kuma ya bayyana wannan a rubuce (a ƙasa). Saboda haka, Yawanci yanzu ya fito da kansa kamar tsohon "Janey." Lokacin da Hind ba ta amsa tambayoyin da ake yi na Prause ba, to sai ta nemi bayanin ta hanyar zanen gidan yanar gizo na Commonwealth - tare, kamar yadda aka saba, ta hanyar batanci da barazanar:

Kuna iya ƙarfafa mai mallakar abun cikin shafin wanda kuka tsara don bayyana cewa an kama marubucinsa yana da'awar "ba da gudummawa" daga littafin da ya shiga aljihunsa. Mista Hind ya kasa amsa tambayoyin da aka yi masa tare da Kwamitin da'a kan yada Labarai. Ina tsammanin ba za ku so sunanku ya kasance cikin damfara irin wannan ba ta kowace hanya.

Yi aiki ya yi imani da cewa gaskiyar abin da na samu na littafin na zuwa ga sadarwar da aka yi wa rajista ta Scotland, wanda na lissafa a matsayin alaƙa da ni don dalilan wasu takardu biyu na ilimi da aka buga a cikin 2016, yana nufin cewa ko ta yaya zan saka aljihun (daga littafina) - kuma don haka suna da rikice-rikice na sha'awa, wanda shine ainihin dalilin, a tunaninta, don sake janye takarda na. Shin wani wannan na yin fahimta ne game da gaskiyar?

A hakikanin gaskiya, ban zama a kan hukumar sadarwar ba, kuma babu wata sanarwa game da littafin da ya karbe shi saboda sakamakon kyauta. Ba zato ba tsammani, abata na yanzu yana cikin jama'a, kamar yadda aka ambata a duka takardun da na buga a 2016. A takaice dai, babu wani abu da ya ɓoye ko rashin dacewa, kuma babu wani rikici na duk abin da - duk da ikirarin Prause a bayan al'amuran da kuma a fili.

A cikin kwanakin Nicole Prause (kamar kanta) ta aikawa MDPI email don neman su janye Park et al., 2016, Asusun Twitter "batsahelps" sun kaiwa Mary Sharpe na Gidauniyar Taimako. A cikin tweet @pornhelps duk amma ya yarda cewa tana da amfani:

Yi aiki, Kinsey grad kuma tsohuwar masanin kimiyya, ta kira kanta masanin ilimin kimiyya, kuma ya bayyana cewa ya fara kwaleji kimanin shekaru 15 da suka gabata. Ba da daɗewa ba bayan wannan bayyanar tweet "pornhelps" ta share duka asusun Twitter da gidan yanar gizon (pornhelps.com) - kamar yadda ya bayyana ga wasu cewa Yin amfani da shi sau da yawa yana yin tweet tare da wannan asusun kuma ya taimaka tare da gidan yanar gizon.

Wadannan sassan na Yi amfani da shafi ba da misalai na wasan kwaikwayo da "batsa" a lokaci guda suna kai hare-hare da ɓata wasu abubuwan da aka fi so na Prause (mazajen da ke gudanar da tarurrukan dawo da batsa, masu bincike na batsa TIME edita Belinda Luscombe, wanda ya rubuta labarin murfin Prause bai yarda da shi ba):

ta karshe: A watan Mayu, 2018 Prause ta yi da'awar ƙarya ga MDPI mai wallafa mujallar (da sauransu) cewa, dangane da shigar da sadaka da aka gabatar a bainar jama'a a kwanan nan (tare da sunan da aka sake sabunta shi, kamar yadda yake daidai), an sake biya bashin kuɗin da aka biya ga jami'in sadaka. Na gabatar da da'awar Prause ga Darryl Mead, Shugaban Gidauniyar Taimako, wanda ya soke ikirarin Prause: Duba Sama Don Bayanai.

----

Kadan daga cikin sauran sakonnin imel da aka ambata a cikin labarin "Janey":

2015

"Musayar" Janey's "da mawallafina]

Daga: Daniel Hind

Kwanan wata: Thu, Mar 26, 2015 a 10:15 AM
Take: RE: Damuwa game da samun riba kamar ba riba a Melting Pot

Wani mai suna Janey Wilson ya tuntube ni ranar Asabar. Cikakkiyar musayar da ke tsakaninmu an yanke ta liƙa a ƙasa. Kamar yadda kake gani na gaya mata cewa ana biyan kuɗin marubucin ga Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici.

Ya kamata in bincika tare da ku, ina tsammani. Yi haƙuri idan na kirkiro rikitarwa marasa mahimmanci ga kowa.

Dan

-----------

Kwanan wata: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:59:12 +0000
Take: Fwd: Rubutun Wilson
daga: xxxxx
ku: xxxx

---- Sakon da aka tura ----
daga: Dan Hind
Kwanan wata: Tue, Mar 24, 2015 a 9:33 AM
Take: Re: Rubutun Wilson
Zuwa: Janey Wilson[email kariya]>
Hukumar Sadaka rajista ce ta kungiyoyin agaji a Ingila da Wales. Gidauniyar Taimako an yi rajista a Scotland.

Ga jerin sunayen ta akan Rijistar Sadaka ta Scottish -

https://www.oscr.org.uk//charities/search-scottish-charity-register/charity-details?charitynumber=sc044948

A Burtaniya yawancin ayyuka an ba su ga Majalisar Scotland, gami da rajistar kungiyoyin agaji, ga alama.

Ina fatan wannan zai warware duk wani rikici,

Naku da gaske,

Dan Hind

-

A Tue, Mar 24, 2015 da karfe 7:15 na safe, Janey Wilson[email kariya]> rubuta:

Aunar Dan Hind,

Na gode da bayanin. Ba zan saba dubawa ba, amma na yi farin ciki da na yi. Wannan ƙungiyar ba ta rajista a cikin Burtaniya ba:
http://apps.charitycommission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfCharities/registerhomepage.aspx

Wannan rajistar gwamnati ce, don haka ban tabbata daga ina zai iya zama ba. Kuna so ku faɗakar da marubucinku cewa suna iya ba da gudummawa ga zamba. Ba zan iya saya bisa ga wannan ba, kuma ban tsammanin kowa ma ya yi haka ba.

J

---

A ranar Litinin, Maris 23, 2015 da ƙarfe 4:42 na safe, Dan Hind ya rubuta:

Ya ku Ms Wilson,

Kudaden marubucin suna tallafawa Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici, wata kungiyar agaji mai rijista a Burtaniya.

http://www.rewardfoundation.org/

Naku da gaske,

Dan Hind

-

Ranar Asabar, Mar 21, 2015 da karfe 6:17 AM, Janey Wilson[email kariya]> rubuta:

Hi,

Na ga abin da aka samu daga wannan littafin duk za a bincika. Wace ƙungiya ce ke cin gajiyarta? Ina so in gani ko zan iya lissafa shi akan haraji na a matsayin cirewa.

---

[“Janey's” yayi musayar tare da tukunyar narkewa]

A ranar 25 Maris 2015 da karfe 12:08 Mohammad Abushaaban[email kariya]> rubuta:

Maryamu - da fatan kuna da ƙarfi.

Na karɓi wannan baƙon daga imel ɗin shuɗi daga Janey Wilson…

Kun san wannan mutumin?

Karanta shi ka sanar dani tunanin ka.

Thanks

Litinin

---- Sakon da aka tura ----
Daga: Janey Wilson[email kariya]>
Kwanan wata: 25 Maris 2015 a 04:09
Take: Damuwa game da neman riba kamar ba riba a Melting Pot
don: [email kariya]

Masoyi Mohammad Abushaaban,

Na yi rubutu ne saboda damuwar Gidauniyar Taimako a Gida mai narkewa, wanda ke zama ba riba. A cikin 2012, Mary Sharpe ce ke da alhakin zaɓar masu magana da TEDX a Glasgow. Ta yanke shawara mara kyau sosai don samun mai ilimin tausa ba tare da tushen ilimin jijiyoyin jiki ba, Gary Wilson, ya nuna matukar damuwa game da ilimin ilimin “jarabar batsa”. Maganar ta kasance mara kyau sosai a halin yanzu ana binciken ta game da ilimin karya ta TEDX. Yanzu, Mista Wilson ya bayyana yana biyan Mary Sharpe don wannan damar.

Musamman, yana siyar da littafi kuma duk kuɗin da littafin ya samu ana faɗaɗa Gidauniyar Taimako don "bincike":

www.karafarinanebartar.ir
Duk da haka, Mary Sharpe ba mai bincike ba ce, ba ta da asalin ilimin ƙwaƙwalwar ajiya, kuma sadaka ba ta da wata hanyar da kowane masanin kimiyya na gaske zai nemi waɗannan kuɗin. Kudin kamar suna shiga kai tsaye zuwa aljihun ta, wataƙila don musanya da tagomashin TEDX dinta a baya. Ungiyar agaji ta ƙara zaɓar kada ta fito fili ta ba da hanyoyin haɗin kuɗaɗen su.

Na shigar da wannan korafin tare da Rajistar Sadaka ta Scottish ita ma. Ina ba ku shawarar ku yi bincike kan yadda wata Malama Sharpe za ta iya amfani da kimiyyar karya don yaudarar mutanen da ke damuwa. Wannan da wuya ya zama daidai da kowane ɗayan burin buri wanda aka jera akan gidan yanar gizon Melting Pot.

J

-

Mohammad Abushaaban, Manajan Kasuwanci

Ingantattun albarkatu ga masu kawo canjin zamantakewa
5 titin Rose, Edinburgh, EH2 2PR
Tel: + 44 (0) 131 243 2626/3

www.TheMeltingPotEdinburgh.org.uk
Kamfani Babu: SC291663

Daga: Janey Wilson[email kariya]>
Kwanan wata: 22 Afrilu 2015 a 17:21
Take: Re: Damuwa game da samun riba kamar ba riba a Melting Pot
Zuwa: Mohammad Abushaaban[email kariya]>

Yanzu ina da takaddun cewa Gary Wilson da kansa yana ikirarin memba ne na Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici. Duk da yake ba a lissafa shi a sabon shafin yanar gizon ba (http://www.rewardfoundation.org/who-we-are.html), wannan yana wakiltar mafi munin zalunci. Ya yi iƙirarin “ba da gudummawa” ga abin da littafinsa ya samu don bincike, wanda yanzu yake zuwa sadaka wacce ba ta da shirye-shiryen bincike kuma wanda yake cikin ta. Mary Sharpe na iya ma ba ta san yana yin waɗannan iƙirarin ba, ban tabbata ba, amma yanzu ya fito da su a fili.

---

Kamar yadda bayani ya gabata a sama, wani nau'I na daban kuma na daban wanda na rubuta tare da likitocin Navy 7 na Amurka, Park, da al., an fara gabatar dashi a watan Maris, 2015 ga Yale Journal of Biology da Medicine a matsayin wani ɓangare na batun "Addiction". Wannan takarda ita ce kawai wurin da aka samu alaƙa da Gidauniyar Taimako a lokacin musayar "Janey", saboda ba ta cikin jama'a. Don haka "Janey" dole ne ya ga an aika wa takardar YJBM don sake dubawa.

---

2016

Yi amfani da tuntuɓar mai wallafa ta, Dan Hind, daga ƙarshe ta fita kanta kamar "Janey Wilson"

Daga: Nikky [email kariya]

A aika: 03 Nuwamba 2016 21:27
don: Dan Hind;
Cc: Dr. Franck Vazquez | Shugaba | MDPI; Iratxe Puebla; [email kariya]; Martyn Rittman; Dakta Shu-Kun Lin; Jim Pfaus
subject: Sake: Littafin mai cin gajiyar kuɗi

Mista Hind,

Mun riga mun sami imel ɗin da ya gabata daga gare ku yana tabbatar da cewa Gary Wilson ya aika da duk kuɗin da littafinsa ya samu zuwa ƙungiyar da yake aiki a zahiri, Gidauniyar Taimako. Kuna iya zaɓar ba ku tabbatar da wannan bayanin ba don Kwamitin Etha'idar Bugawa, amma ana iya samar musu da imel ɗin da ya gabata.

Marubucinku ya kasa bayyana rikice-rikicen kuɗi na sha'awa cikin wallafe-wallafe da yawa yanzu don cin ribar kansa yayin da'awar "ba da gudummawa" ga abin da aka samu ga jama'a (da ku). Wannan tuni ilimin jama'a ne wanda zaku iya zama a rikodin don taimakawa fallasa ko cin riba, kamar yadda kuke so.

NP

Nicole Prause, Ph.D.

Bincike: www.span-lab.com

Kamfanin Liberos LLC: www

323.919.0783

--------

Email zuwa ga Dan Hind mai tsara yanar gizo:

Daga: Jamie Kendall[email kariya]>
A aika: 04 Nuwamba 2016 11:32
don: Daniel Hind
subject: Fwd: Mai cin gajiyar littafin

Barka dai Dan,

Na gaya musu zan gabatar muku da duk abin da yake kanku.

Jamie

Jamie Kendall MA (RCA)

www.jamiekendall.com

Fara sakon da aka tura:

Daga: Nikky[email kariya]>

Take: Fwd: Mai cin gajiyar littafin

Kwanan wata: 3 Nuwamba 2016 da karfe 21:31:24 GMT

don: [email kariya]

Ya ƙaunataccen Mr. Kendall,

Kuna iya ƙarfafa mai mallakar abun cikin yanar gizon wanda kuka tsara don bayyana cewa an kama marubucinsa yana da'awar "ba da gudummawa" kuɗin daga littafin da ya shiga aljihunsa. Mista Hind ya kasa amsa tambayoyin da aka yi masa tare da Kwamitin da'a kan yada Labarai. Ina tsammanin ba za ku so sunanku ya kasance cikin damfara irin wannan ba ta kowace hanya.

NP
Nicole Prause, Ph.D.
Bincike: www.span-lab.com
Kamfanin Liberos LLC: www
323.919.0783


Summary:

  1. Maris, 2015 wani fasali na farko na Park et al. aka sallama ga Yale Journal of Biology da Medicine. The sallama zuwa YJBM shine kawai wurin da na kasance tare da sadaka The Reward Foundation (TRF), saboda babu inda jama'a ke.
  2. Tsakanin Maris 21st da Afrilu 22nd na 2015, "Janey Wilson" ya aika imel da yawa ga Dan Hind na Kungiyar Buga ta Commonwealth, Mohammad Abushaaban na Tukunyar narkewa Edinburgh (wanda ke Gidauniyar Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici), da Mai Kula da Sadaka na Scottish. Duk suna ƙunshe da da'awar mara izini na aikata ba daidai ba. Da alama da alama daga cikin abun ciki da salon rarrabe cewa “Janey” a zahiri Nicole Prause ne - wanda daga baya aka tabbatar da shi.
  3. The YJBM an sanar da shi game da halayyar cin zarafin (wanda ɗayan masu nazarin su biyu ya gabatar a gaban "Janey Wilson"). Lokacin da aka ba da shawarar cewa Dokta Prause na iya kasancewa a bayan waɗannan imel ɗin ban mamaki da ƙin yarda da takarda, an karɓi takarda da sauri… sannan ba a buga shi ba bayan duka, bisa ga iƙirarin cewa ya yi latti don saduwa da lokacin bugawa don YJBM's "Batutuwa" batun.
  4. An sake sabunta fasalin takarda zuwa mujallar Kimiyya mai zurfi. Wasu mutane huɗu sun sake nazarin takardar tare da karɓar 3 da kuma Faɗaɗawa (kamar yadda muka gano daga baya) ƙin yarda da ita tare da jerin "matsalolin 77".
  5. Da yawa daga cikin abubuwan da ake kira matsaloli 77 an sakasu kwafi kuma an manna su daga binciken da Prause yayi na YJBM ƙaddamar, kamar yadda 25 daga cikinsu ba su da alaƙa da Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa takarda.
  6. Kadan daga cikin matsalolin 77 za a iya ɗaukar halal. Mawallafa sun ba MDPI da ma'ana ta hanyar mayar da martani ga kowane abin da ake kira matsala.
  7. Park et al. an sake duba shi kuma an sake duba shi ta ƙarin masu dubawa biyu.
  8. Da zaran Park et al., An buga 2016, Prause ta fara kamfen dinta don ganin an janye takardar, tana aikawa da sakonni marasa adadi zuwa MDPI, COPE, Navy, kwamitocin likitocin, da kuma mai wallafa ta (kuma mai yiwuwa PubMed, FTC kuma wanene ya san inda kuma) .
  9. MDPI ta ba da damar amfani da damar don buga sharhi na yau da kullun akan Park et al, a Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa. Gunaguni ya ƙi. Idan da gaske takardar ba ta isa ba, zai zama abu ne mai sauƙi a wulakanta shi tare da yin sharhi na yau da kullun.
  10. A ƙarshen 2016, Prause ta fitar da kanta a matsayin "Janey Wilson" lokacin da ta buƙaci (akai-akai da rashin nasara) cewa mai wallafa na tabbatar haɗata da ƙungiyar sadaka ta Scottish da ake kira The Reward Foundation don Nunawa a rubuce. Kwafa duka MDPI (babban mawallafin jaridar da aka ambata a sama) da ƙungiyar ɗabi'a mai ɗabi'a, Prause ya gaya wa Dan Hind na Commonwealth cewa shi ya riga ya rubuta ta don wannan sakamako. Duk da haka ya dace ne kawai game da alaƙar da "Janey."
  11. Duk da yake mummunan cikin hare-harenta, kuma sau da yawa karya game da ni da abin da jaridar ta ƙunsa, Komawa daga ƙarshe ya zo ne kawai da batutuwan 2 kawai da COPE za ta yi la'akari da (1) Matsayin rashin cancanta na Gary Wilson tare da Gidauniyar Taimako, (2) Yarda da mutane uku suka gabatar a batun nazarin.
  12. Kodayake ina matukar tausaya wa COPE, kuma ina iya hango bambance-bambance Kwamitinsu dole ne ya jure, a ganina, babu wani dalilin da zai sa a yi watsi da shi ko ma don gyara (duk da cewa irin waɗannan gyaran na sama ba su da wata matsala), kamar yadda
    1. Abubuwan da ba ni da ma'amala da Gidauniyar Taimako a bayyane ba rikici ba ne na sha'awa kuma an riga an bayyana alakata a cikin takarda ta asali, kuma
    2. Rundunar Sojojin Ruwa sun bi jagororinta don yarda (wanda a zahiri baya buƙata wani rubutaccen yarda don nazarin shari'ar tare da ƙasa da marasa lafiya 4). Ko da hakane, a cikin yawan taka tsantsan na likitanci, an sami cikakken rubutaccen izini kafin mutane biyu. Don na uku, ba a sami cikakkun bayanai don buƙatar izini ba a cikin takardar. Wani binciken Sojojin Ruwa na Amurka ya tabbatar da cewa likitocin sun bi duk dokokin IRB.

Kodayake wasu na iya yarda da ni, a bayyane yake cewa babu ɗayan waɗannan mahimman bayanai da suka haɗa da "yaudara" ko rashin da'a, kamar yadda Prause ya ci gaba da nace.


Me ke faruwa anan?

Shekaru biyu Prause da Ley sun hada kai don ɓata, tursasawa da kuma cin zarafin mutane da ƙungiyoyi waɗanda suka yi gargaɗi game da illolin batsa ko buga rahoton binciken batsa. Kwanan nan, Prause da Ley sun haɓaka ayyukansu na rashin daidaituwa kuma yawancin lokuta ba bisa doka ba don tallafawa tsarin masana'antar batsa. Misali, 0n Janairu 29, 2019, Prause sun shigar da kara aikace-aikacen kasuwanci don samun KABRAINONPORN da KABRAINONPORN.COM. A watan Afrilu 2019, kungiyar da ke jagorancin Prause da Ley suka shiga ciki Haramtacciyar cinikayya mara izini of YourBrainOnPorn.com ta hanyar kirkirar “RealYourBrainOnPorn.com.

Don tallata shafin da ba bisa ka'ida ba, masu ƙwararrun "ƙwararrun" sun kirkiro wani asusun Twitter (https://twitter.com/BrainOnPorn), YouTube channel, Facebook page, da kuma buga wani latsa release. A wani yunƙuri na neman ruɗar da jama'a, sanarwar da aka watsa ta ce ta samo asali ne daga garin Gary Wilson - Ashland, Oregon (babu ɗaya daga cikin “masana” da ke zaune a Oregon, balle Ashland). Yi hukunci da kanku ko "ƙwararrun" sun ci gaba da sha'awar masana'antar batsa ko ingantaccen binciken kimiyya ta hanyar yin izgili wannan tarin gado na RealYBOP. Rubuta cikin Dr. Prause bambancin saɓo, tweets sunyi amfani da batsa, suna ɓatar da halin yanzu na binciken, kuma mutane da ƙungiyoyi da yawa kungiya sun yi ta damuwa.

Bugu da kari, “kwararru” sun kirkiri wani asusun na Reddit (mai amfani / sciencearousal) to spam batsa maida forums reddit / maras kyau da kuma reddit / NoFap tare da promotional drivel, da'awar yin amfani da batsa ba shi da kyau kuma lalata YourBrainOnPorn.com da Gary Wilson. Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa Prause, wani tsohon malami, yana da Tarihin tarihi da yawa na amfani da sunayen laƙabi da yawa don aikawa a kan tattaunawar tattaunawa na batsa. (YBOP yanzu haka) sun shiga harkar shari'a tare da Prause da kawayenta na lalata).

A watan Yulin shekarar 2019, David Ley da biyu daga cikin sanannun RealYBOP "masana" (Justin Lehmiller da Chris Donaghue) sun fara hada kai a bayyane tare da masana'antar batsa. Duk 3 suna kan kwamitin ba da shawara na gudun hijira Harkokin Kiwan Lafiya na Jima'i (SHA). A cikin rikici mai ban sha'awa na kudi, David Ley da SHA sune ana biya shi ta hanyar masana'antar batsa mai girma xHamster don inganta shafukan yanar gizo (watau StripChat) da kuma shawo kan masu amfani cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i sune tatsuniyoyi!

Onari akan Nicole Prause

A cikin 2013 tsohon mai bincike na UCLA Nicole Prause ya fara nuna damuwa da jin dadi, da kuma yin watsi da labarun Gary Wilson. (Ba a taɓa yin aiki da ma'aikata ba tun daga Janairu, 2015.) A cikin ɗan gajeren lokaci sai ta fara farautar wasu, ciki har da masu bincike, likitoci, likitoci, masu ilimin psychologist, tsohon abokin aiki na UCLA, sadaukarwa a Birtaniya, maza a dawowa, TIME editan mujallar, masanan furofesoshi, IITAP, SASH, Yakin Sabuwar Magunguna, Firayen Fitowa, NoFap.com, Sabuntawa, YourBrainRebalanced, littafin jarida Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, iyayensa MDPI, US likitoci na likitoci, shugaban jaridar kimiyya CUREUS, da mujallar Yin jima'i da jima'i da jima'i.

Yayin da yake ba da lokutan hutun da yake tsokanar wasu, Kuyi aiki tare da hankali - tare da hujjoji na gaskiya - hujja cewa ta kasance "wanda aka azabtar" mafi yawan duk wanda ya yi kokarin yarda da ita game da iƙirarin da ba ta dace ba game da tasirin batsa ko halin bincike na batsa na yanzu. Don magance cin zarafin da ake ci gaba da yi da kuma iƙirarin ƙarya, YBOP ya zama dole ya tattara wasu ayyukan Prause. Yi la’akari da shafuka masu zuwa. (Additionalarin abubuwan da suka faru sun faru cewa bamu isa mu 'yanta ba - kamar yadda waɗanda ke cikin Prause suna tsoron karin azaba.)

A farkon Farawa yayi amfani da dama sunayen masu amfani na asali don sakawa batsa dawowa matsala, Quora, wikipedia, da kuma cikin comment sashe ƙarƙashin sharuɗɗa. Yin amfani da wuya ya yi amfani da ainihin sunansa ko asusunsa na kafofin watsa labarun. Wannan duk ya canza bayan UCLA ya zaɓi kada ya sabunta kwangilar Prause (kusa da Janairu, 2015).

Ba da damar yin la'akari da aiki yanzu ba, in ji Prause magoya bayanan kafofin watsa labarai biyu daga Media 2 × 3 zuwa karamin kamfanin kamfaninta na “Masu hadin gwiwa.” (har yanzu Media 2 × 3 shugaba Jess Ponce ya bayyana kansa a matsayin Mai horar da 'yan jarida ta Hollywood da gwani.) Ayyukansu shi ne sanya rubutun a cikin latsa yana nuna Prause, kuma ta same ta magana shawarwari in pro-porn kuma wurare masu mahimmanci. Tsarin maganganun ga masanin kimiyya ba tare da nuna bambanci ba.

Gunaguni ya fara sanya sunansa zuwa ga ƙarya, da ke fitowa da yanar-gizon mutane masu yawa da kungiyoyi akan kafofin watsa labarai da kuma sauran wurare. Tun lokacin da aka yi amfani da Prause a matsayin Gary Wilson (daruruwan kafofin watsa labarun kafofin watsa labarun tare da bayan bayanan lambobin imel), ya zama wajibi ne don saka idanu da kuma rubutun tweets da posts. An yi haka ne domin kare lafiyarta, kuma yana da mahimmanci ga duk wani mataki na doka.

Ba da daɗewa ba ya zama fili cewa tweets da sharhi na Prause sun kasance da wuya game da bincike da jima'i, ko kuma wani nau'in batun da ya dace da ita. A gaskiya ma, yawancin wuraren da aka yi wa Prause za su iya raba kashi biyu:

  1. Taimakon kai tsaye na masana'antar batsa: Mai lalata & & ad hominem tsokaci game da mutane daban-daban da kungiyoyi da ta lakaba mata a matsayin "masu gwagwarmayar lalata da batsa" (galibi suna ikirarin cewa wanda aka cutar da wadannan mutane da kungiyoyi). Sanya anan: shafi na 1, shafi na 2, shafi na 3, Da kuma shafi na 4.
  2. Kai tsaye tallafin masana'antar batsa:
    • musamman FSC (Jagorar Magana Ta Musamman), AVN (Adult Video News), masu sauti na wasan kwaikwayo, masu wasan kwaikwayon, da kuma abubuwan da suka dace
    • asarar rashin fahimta game da binciken batsa da kuma hare-haren da ake yi akan batsa ko kuma masu binciken batsa.

Shafukan da ke biye suna ɗauke da samfurin tarko da maganganu masu alaƙa da #2 - babban ƙarfin gwiwarta ga masana'antar batsa da matsayin da aka zaɓa. YBOP yana da ra'ayin cewa rashin jituwar da Prause ta yi ya karu zuwa irin wannan bata-lokaci mai cike da ladabi (da zargin wasu da yawa da aka yi wa “cin mutuncin ta,” “misogyny,” “ƙarfafa wasu don yi mata fyade,” da kuma “kasancewa ne-Nazis”). , cewa muna tilasta bincika ta yiwu dalilin. An raba wannan kayan zuwa manyan sassan 4:

  1. SASHE NA 1: Nicole Prause & masana'antar batsa:
  2. SASHE NA 2: Shin Nicole yayi amfani da "PornHelps"? (Shafin yanar gizon PornHelps, @pornhelps a Twitter, sharhi a ƙarƙashin shafuka). Duk asusun da aka share sau ɗaya An yi masa kisa kamar "PornHelps."
  3. SASHE NA 3: Misalan Nicole Prause da ke tallafa wa masana'antar batsa ta hanyar ɓatar da bincike da kai hare-hare kan karatu / masu bincike.
  4. SASHE NA 4: "RealYBOP": Yin aiki tare da abokan tarayya suna ƙirƙirar intanet da kuma labarun kafofin watsa labarun da suka goyi bayan wani shiri na kamfanoni.

Duk da yake babu wata hujja game da kowane ɗayan waɗanda aka yi wa fyaɗe da ke faɗin cewa Fuskantar tana karɓar kuɗi daga masana'antar batsa, ana iya gafarta wa kowa don mamaki ko ta is Lalle ne masana'antar batsa sun rinjayi. A Yi amfani da shafuka a kan wannan rukunin yanar gizon shine kawai ƙarshen babban Ice Iceberg. Ta buga sau dubunnan, tana afkawa kowa da kowa wanda yake ba da shawarar batsa na iya haifar da matsala. (Yi amfani da kwanan nan ya tsabtace asusun ajiyarta na 3,000 ko fiye da masu tayar da hankali.) Ta kare masana'antar a kowane juzu'i, kamar yadda za a iya tsammanin shugaban masana'antar da aka biya ya yi. A bayyane yake Prause, wanda ke zaune a LA, yana jin daɗin kyakkyawar dangantaka da masana'antar batsa. Duba wannan Hoton ta (a gefen hagu) a fili an ɗauka a kan karar mota na Ƙungiyar Masu Rauni na XRCO (X-Rated Critics Organization (XRCO). Bisa lafazin wikifeda,

"The XRCO Awards an ba da Amurka Ƙungiyar Ƙungiyar X-Rated a kowace shekara ga mutanen da ke aiki girma dijital kuma ita ce kawai balagar masana'antun masana'antu da aka nuna kawai don 'yan kasuwa.[1]"

Hotunan da aka ɗauka a kyaututtukan XRCO na 2016 (Fage & zauren shahararriyar tauraruwar tauraruwa Melissa Hill a ƙasa-hagu). Lura: Akwai tabbataccen shaida wanda ke nuna cewa masana'antar batsa ta tallafa wa sana'ar ta ilimin jima'i shekaru da yawa. Tsarin ilimin Sexology har yanzu yana fitowa don bauta wa masana'antar batsa. Don haka, shaidar a wannan shafin ya kamata a duba shi a cikin babban mahallin. Duba Hugh Hefner, Cibiyar Harkokin Jima'i ta Duniya, da kuma Shugaban {asashensa don fahimtar yadda batsa-masana'antu da jima'i masu jima'i suka rinjayi Kinsey Institute. Gunawa ne Kinsey grad.

Onari akan David Ley

Rikicin kudi na David Ley na ban sha'awa (IOC) bayyana fili.

COI #1: A cikin rikici mai ban sha'awa na kudi, David Ley shine ana rama shi ta hanyar masana'antar batsa babban kamfanin X-hamster don inganta rukunin yanar gizon su da kuma shawo kan masu amfani cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i tatsuniyoyi ne! Musamman, David Ley da sabon kirkirar Harkokin Kiwan Lafiya na Jima'i (SHA) suna da haɓaka tare da rukunin yanar gizon X-Hamster (Zagin-hira). Duba “Rashin daidaito ya hada kai da Allianceungiyar Lafiyar Jima'i don bugun kwakwalwarka mai lalata batsa":

Fledungiyar healthariyar Lafiya ta Jima'i (SHA) kwamitin ba da shawara ya hada da David Ley da wasu biyu RealYourBrainOnPorn.com “masana” (Justin Lehmiller & Chris Donahue). RealYBOP rukuni ne na bayyane pro-batsa, 'shelar kwararru' da shugabanni suka nuna Nicole Farko. Wannan kuma kungiyar da ke aiki a halin yanzu haramtacciyar alamar kasuwanci ta ƙetare doka da oda Yayi wa JBOP halal. A sa a sauƙaƙe, Wadanda ke kokarin tona bakin YBOP suma masana'antun batsa suna biyan su don inganta kasuwancin / kasuwancin su, da kuma tabbatar da masu amfani da yanar gizon batsa da cam ba sa haifar da matsala (lura: Nicole Prause yana da kusanci, dangantakar jama'a da masana'antar batsa a matsayin rubuce a wannan shafin).

In wannan labarin, Ley yayi watsi da haɓakar da ya biya na masana'antar batsa:

Gaskiya ne, ƙwararrun masana kiwon lafiyar jima'i suna yin kawance kai tsaye tare da dandamali na batsa na kasuwanci suna fuskantar wasu abubuwan da za su iya faɗuwa, musamman ga waɗanda suke son gabatar da kansu a matsayin marasa ƙarancin tsari. "Ina tsammanin cikakkiyar [masu ba da shawara game da batsa) ga duka kururuwa, 'Oh, duba, ga, David Ley yana aiki don batsa,'" in ji Ley, an ambaci suna akai-akai tare da nuna kyama a cikin al'ummomin anti-taba al'aura kamar NoFap.

Amma ko da aikinsa tare da Stripchat babu shakka zai samar da abinci ga duk wanda ke ɗokin rubuta shi a matsayin son kai ko kuma a aljihun ɗakin batsa, don Ley, cewa cinikin ciniki ya cancanci hakan. "Idan muna son taimakawa [masu sayen batsa], dole ne mu je wurinsu," in ji shi. "Kuma wannan shi ne yadda muke yin hakan."

Yin son kai? Ley na tunatar da mu likitoci masu taba sigari, da xualungiyar Lafiya ta Jima'i suna tunatar da mu Cibiyar Tuba.

COI #2 David Ley ne ana biya don cin amanar batsa da kuma jarabar jima'i. A karshen wannan Psychology yau blog post Ley ya ce:

"Bayyanar sirri: David Ley ya bayar da shaida a shari'oin da suka shafi da'awar jima'i."

A cikin sabon gidan yanar gizo na 2019 David Ley ya ba da nasa sabis ɗin “ramawa” sosai:

David J. Ley, Ph.D., masanin halayyar ɗan adam ne kuma mai ba da izini na mai kulawa da ilimin jima'i, wanda aka kafa a Albuquerque, NM. Ya ba da ƙwararren mashaidi da shaidar zur a cikin shari'oi da yawa a kusa da Amurka. Dokta Ley ana ɗaukarsa ƙwararren masani game da ɓatar da ikirarin jarabar jima'i, kuma an ba shi ƙwararren masani kan wannan batun. Ya bayar da shaida a kotunan jihar da na tarayya.

Tuntuɓi shi don samun jadawalin kuɗin sa kuma shirya alƙawari don tattauna sha'awar ku.

COI #3: Ley ta kashe kuɗaɗe don sayar da littattafai guda biyu waɗanda ke musun lalata da jarabar batsa (“Labarin na Jima'i Jima'i, ”2012 da“Dangantakar Kwallo na Dicks,"2016). Pornhub (wanda ke ɗaukar hoto na MindGeek na batsa) yana ɗayan ɗayan tallafin baya guda biyar da aka jera don littafin Ley's 2016 game da batsa:

Lura: PornHub ya kasance Shafin Twitter na biyu don sake tallata sakon farko na RealYBOP tana sanar da shafin yanar gizon "kwararru", wanda ke ba da shawara don daidaitawa tsakanin PornHub da Masana realYBOP. Kai!

COI #4: A ƙarshe, David Ley yana samun kuɗi ta hanyar Taro na CEU, inda yake inganta akidun ictionan masu kara kuzari da aka bayyana a cikin littattafansa guda biyu (waɗanda basa kulawa (?) sun yi watsi da ɗimbin karatun da kuma mahimmancin sabon Wahalar Cututtuka Raunin Jima'i a cikin littafin bincike na Kungiyar Lafiya ta Duniya). Ley ya rama saboda maganganunsa da yawa wanda ya nuna ra'ayoyinsa na batsa. A cikin wannan gabatarwar 2019 Ley ya bayyana don tallafawa da haɓaka amfani da batsa: Haɓaka Cikakkiyar jima'i da Amincewa da Amfani da Labarin Batsa a cikin samari.


Yuni, 2019: MDPI (gidan iyaye na mujallar Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa) wallafa wani Editorial game da halin rashin da'a na Nicole Prause da ke kewaye da ita m yunkurin a yi Park et al,, 2016 ya janye

Bayanin MDPI game da halayyar Prause (wanda aka rubuta a sama):

21 Yuni 2019

Sharhi akan Park, B., et al. Shin batsa na Intanit yana haifar da lalata Jima'i? Binciken tare da Rahoton Clinical Behav. Sci. 2016, 6, 17

A watan Agusta 2017, Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa buga labarin [1], wanda ya haɗa da nazarin shari'ar wasu mutane uku a cikin Rundunar Sojan Ruwa ta Amurka. Takardar ta fara aiwatar da tsarin edita na yau da kullun, gami da nazarin takwarorinmu, kuma an karɓa don buga shi. Tun daga wannan lokacin, mun sami korafe-korafe da yawa daga wani mutum ɗaya da ke iƙirarin cewa takardar tana da lahani ƙwarai da gaske kuma yana kira da a janye labarin. A cikin wannan tsokaci muna son sake jaddada cewa an bi hanyoyin da suka dace wajen aiwatar da rubutun kuma don yin adawa da wasu da'awar a fili. Kwamitin Etha'idodin Bugawa (COPE) yayi la'akari da wasu daga cikin waɗannan batutuwan kuma muna godiya ga shawarwarin su da haɗin kai. Muna kuma yi wa marubutan godiya saboda hadin kan da suka ba mu.

Aya daga cikin ƙaƙƙarfan da'awar da aka gabatar akan takardar ita ce cewa ba a nemi izinin da ake buƙata daga mutane uku da aka gabatar a cikin binciken da aka gabatar ba. Dangane da umarnin ga marubutan da aka sanya akan Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa gidan yanar gizo, yakamata a sami izinin sanarwa don nazarin yanayin inda akwai haɗarin da za'a iya gano mutane. Lokacin da aka tambaye su don tabbatar da wannan batun, marubutan sun tabbatar da cewa an sami izini ga mutane biyu kuma don na uku ba a raba cikakkun bayanai a cikin takarda don buƙatar yarda. Ofishin edita ya ga sake kwafi na fom din yarda da aka yi amfani da shi kuma ya gamsu da bayanin marubutan.

Wani batun shi ne cewa editan ilimi na labarin bai san cewa yana yanke shawara na ƙarshe don karɓar labarin [1] don bugawa ba. Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa yana amfani da daidaitaccen samfuri don gayyatar masu gyara don yanke shawara ta ƙarshe don karɓar rubuce-rubucen, wanda kuma aka yi a wannan yanayin. Tun lokacin da aka yi korafin, editan ilimi na asali ya sanar da mu cewa bai san cewa wannan shi ne matsayinsa ga jaridar ba. Mun sake yin la'akari da tsarin sake duba takwarorinmu tare da (yanzu haka) Babban Edita-Cif John Coverdale kuma mun yanke shawara cewa kada a cire rubutun saboda wannan dalili. A cikin Gyara da aka buga [2], an gyara bayanan editan ilimi.

Yawancin maganganu game da rikice-rikicen sha'awar marubutan an yi su ne dangane da [1]. Rikici guda daya na ban sha'awa na rashin kudi ne kawai aka samu wanda aka tabbatar kuma an sabunta takarda [2].

Sakamakon haka, MDPI ta sabunta umarnin ta ga marubuta don ba da ƙarin haske game da batun yarda da sanarwa da kuma kyakkyawan jagorar marubuta a wannan yankin. Bukatunmu da manufofinmu basu canza ba kuma muna ci gaba da bin jagororin da COPE ya bayar.

Mun yi imanin cewa rikice-rikicen da ke tattare da wannan takarda ya samo asali ne daga bambancin ra'ayi dangane da yadda ake kula da mutane ta amfani da manyan hotuna na batsa, kuma ba damuwa ta gaskiya game da aikin edita a kusa da takardar [3]. Ra'ayinmu shi ne cewa hanyar da ta dace don magance irin wannan rigimar ita ce ta gabatar da hujjoji da jayayya a cikin duba-tsara, mahallin kimiyya inda aka bayyana duk rikice-rikice na sha'awa daga bangarorin biyu yadda ya kamata. Zargi na mutum ba shi da wuri a cikin wannan mahallin kuma ƙoƙarin rufe waɗanda suke da ra'ayoyi masu adawa da su ta hanyar cire aikinsu daga wallafe-wallafen ba hanya ce madaidaiciya ba. Mun san cewa yawancin marubuta da masu karatu suna kusanci bincike ta hanya mai ma'ana da kuma tsunduma kuma muna so mu ba da shawarar wannan hanyar don fa'idantar da ƙungiyar bincike gabaɗaya.

References

[1] Park, BY; Wilson, G.; Berger, J.; Christman, M.; Reina, B.; Bishop, F .; Klam, WP; Doan, AP Shin Intanit Intanit yana haifar da lalata Jima'i? Binciken tare da Rahoton Clinical. Sci. 2016, 6, 17.

[2] Park, BY et al .; Gyara: Park, BY, et al. Shin batsa na Intanit yana haifar da lalata Jima'i? Binciken tare da Rahoton Clinical Sci. 2016, 6, 17. Behav. Sci. 2018, 8, 55.

[3] Marcus, A. "Jarida ta gyara, amma ba za ta ja da baya ba, takarda mai kawo cece-kuce akan batsa ta intanet". karyata Watch. Akwai kan layi: https://retractionwatch.com/2018/06/13/journal-corrects-but-will-not-retract-controversial-paper-on-internet-porn/ (isa ga 13 Yuni 2018) kuma https://web.archive.org/web/20180913124808/https://retractionwatch.com/2018/06/13/journal-corrects-but-will-not-retract-controversial-paper-on-internet-porn/ (adana a kan 13 Satumba 2018).

Bayanin Gary Wilson akan jumla mai zuwa:

Rikici guda daya na ban sha'awa wanda ba na kudi ba ne aka tabbatar da shi kuma an sabunta takarda [2].

Kamar yadda nayi bayani a tsokacina na Kallon kallo (wanda aka dakatar da shi ta hanyar retraction Watch!), myungiyata da Gidauniyar Taimako ta kasance akan asalin takarda, kuma akan wani samfurin da aka gabatar da shi zuwa Yale Journal of Biology & Medicine a farkon 2015. Sharhi na:

Abin da ba a bayyana ba a cikin wannan labarin shi ne cewa an bayyana alaƙar ta (Wilson) tare da Gidauniyar Taimako daga farkon (duba asalin asalin PubMed, wanda aka buga a watan Agusta, 2016 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5039517/). An buga gyaran ne don kariyata, a yunƙurin dakatar da Dakta Prause daga ci gaba da da'awar cewa Gidauniyar Taimako ta biya ni a matsayina na mai neman shiga, ko kuma kawai ana “biyana.” (Ta ci gaba da gabatar da ra'ayoyi marasa tushe da yawa game da cin hanci da rashawa na.) a Gidauniyar Taimako an kara su. Bugu da ƙari, wannan ya kasance don hana ƙarin tabbaci na duk wani rikicin rikice-rikicen kuɗi na sha'awa. Sigar da aka gyara: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/8/6/55/htm

A taƙaice, ana nufin gyara don kare ni daga Yin amfani da littafinta na ƙarya da ke tattare da wannan takarda.


Yuni, 2019: Amsar hukuma ta MDPI zuwa Shafin Wikipedia na MDPI (wanda Nicole Prause sockpuppets da yawa suka shirya shi)

Ba da daɗewa ba Park et al., An buga 2016 An yi amfani da Fuse a kan yaki da MDPI, Kimiyyar halayyar kirkire-kirkire, da marubutan Park et al., Yin amfani da hanyoyi da yawa na kai hari da boye (rubuce a wannan shafi mai faɗi - Gudanar da ƙoƙarin kokarin da za a yi nazari na Behavioral Sciences (Park et al., 2016) ya janye ). Wata hanyar kai hari ita ce gyara shafin Wikipedia na MDPI ta amfani da laƙabi da yawa (sockpuppets), wanda ya keta dokokin Wikipedia. Zuwa yau mun gano aƙalla 30 mai yiwuwa Yi amfani da sockpuppets.

Bari mu fara da mai amfani da Wikipedia NeuroSex, waɗanda ke da aƙalla wasu laƙabi 8 - duk waɗannan an hana su azaman Wikipedia sockpuppets na NeuroSex. Neurosex, sockpuppets dinta, da sauran kayan wasan kwaikwayo sun shirya Wikipedia, sa bayanan karya game da Gary Wilson, Park et al. da MDPI (PDF na Nicole Prause sunayen laƙabi da ta kasance don musgunawa & ɓata suna).

Misali, NeuroSex an saka bayanai masu kamannin amfani da tweets da shan abun ciki kai tsaye daga musayar imel ɗin Prause tare da MDPI (da yawa wanda Wilson ya gani). NeuroSex ya yi iƙirarin suna da imel na MDPI masu zaman kansu - wanda suke so su aika zuwa shafin MDPI Wikipedia. Ga abin da NeuroSex ya ce a cikin sharhinta. (Lura: A cikin imel ɗin ta na lokaci daya zuwa MDPI, Yi amfani da cc'd SakamakowaShirarwa, a fili don barazana ga MDPI tare da karɓar fansa.):

Ina da hotunan da ke tabbatar da duk wata ikirarin (misali, imel daga mai wallafa, imel ɗin daga editan da aka jera, da dai sauransu). RetractionWatch da wasu kantuna suna la'akari rubuta reviews na shi da, amma ba zan iya tabbata wadanda za materialize. Yaya mafi kyau don samar da irin wannan shaidar da ke tabbatar da ƙidodin? Kamar yadda aka sanya hoto? An rubuta wani wuri tare da hotuna da nasaba?

Bari mu kawo wasu 'yan misalai na gyaran "NeuroSex" (karya) masu alaka da Gary Wilson da kuma zuwa Park et al., 2016 - bayan bayanan Wilson:

NeuroSex gyara # 1: Gary Wilson ya kasance {{cite yanar gizo | take = an biya sama da fam 9000 | url =https://www.oscr.org.uk/downloadfile.aspx?id=160223&type=5&charityid=SC044948&arid=236451}} Gidauniyar Bada Tukuici don shiga cikin Amurka a madadin maganganun da ke nuna alamun batsa.

Gary Wilson yayi sharhi: NeuroSex ya haɗu da wani daftarin aiki da aka sake gyara, yana mai iƙirarin cewa an ba Gary Wilson fam 9,000 ta charityan agaji na Scottish The Reward Foundation. Kwana biyu da suka gabata Yi amfani da karyar ƙarya ga MDPI mai wallafa mujallar (da sauransu) cewa, bisa ga shigar da sadaka da aka gabatar a bainar jama'a a kwanan nan (tare da sunan da aka sake gyara, kamar yadda yake daidai), an sake biyan kuɗin da aka biya ga jami'in sadaka da gaske ga Wilson. Gwadawa bai bincika gaskiyarta ba, kuma tayi kuskure (sake). Wilson bai taɓa karɓar kuɗi daga Gidauniyar Taimako ba. Yi aiki ya maimaita wannan ƙarya a wani wuri.

Sockpuppets uku na NeuroSex wadanda suka shirya shafin MDPI Wikpedia (hanyoyin nuna jerin abubuwan gyara ga kowane sockpuppet):

Sauran abubuwan sockpuppets na NeuroSex (Prause) waɗanda suma suka shirya MDPI (akwai yiwuwar akwai ƙarin):

Sauran jerin sockpuppets da yawa an jera su a ƙarshen wannan ɓangaren: Afrilu-Mayu, 2019: Sockpuppets "NeuroSex" guda biyu (SecondaryEd2020 & Sciencearousal) su gyara Wikipedia, sa hanyoyin RealYourBrainOnporn.com da kuma Furofaganda mai kama da juna

Game da sanarwar MDPI:

Sanarwa daga MDPI 19 Yuni 2019

Amsawa ga MDPI Wikipedia Mataki na ashirin da

Wikipedia tushe ne mai mahimmanci na ilimin zamantakewar al'umma kuma MDPI tana goyan bayan yunƙurin yaɗa ilimin a bayyane, wanda yayi daidai da manufofin MDPI. Abun takaici, wasu editoci na shafin Wikipedia game da MDPI basu da ma'ana. Wannan ya sa labarin ya kasance mai son nuna wariya da rashin sani game da yawancin ayyukan MDPI. Duk wani ci gaban da aka samu wanda aka kara a shafin ana cire shi da sauri. Mun yi ƙoƙari da yawa don tattaunawa tare da editocin Wikipedia don inganta ingancin labarin, amma ba tare da nasara ba. Don haka, a halin yanzu, ba mu ba da shawarar Wikipedia a matsayin tushen tushen abin dogara game da MDPI.

Don cikakken tarihin MDPI, duba https://www.mdpi.com/about/history. Bugu da kari, akwai hanyoyin samun bayanai na bangare na uku game da mujallolin MDPI kamar su http://qoam.eu/journals, da kuma Shafuka (https://publons.com/journal/?order_by=num_reviews_last_one_year).

Kusan kashi uku cikin huɗu na labarin Wikipedia sun shafi batutuwa masu rikitarwa, suna ambaton 4 cikin sama da 200,000 da aka buga takardu, wani misali inda mambobin kwamitin edita 10 suka yi murabus (a cikin 2018 muna da sama da Membobin Editan Edita sama da 43,000 da Editocin Baƙi), da kuma haɗawa cikin jerin Jeffrey Beall, da aka sani da tushen tushe ba tare da damar buɗewa ba kuma daga wacce aka cire MDPI (duba amsarmu nan). Duk da yake ba mu adawa da ambaton wadannan batutuwa, hanyar da aka gabatar da su bata ce.

Ana iya samun martani ga wasu daga cikin batutuwan da aka rufe a:

Paradox na Australiya (Gina Jiki): https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/4/4/258/htm.

Takardar Andrulis (Rayuwa): https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/2/1/213/htm.

Murabus din kwamitin Edita (Gina Jiki): https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/1389.

Sharhi akan Park, B., et al. Shin batsa na Intanit yana haifar da lalata Jima'i? Binciken tare da Rahoton Clinical Behav. Sci. 2016, 6, 17: https://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/1616.

Babban kamfanin iyaye da ke sanya bayanan hukuma guda biyu masu alaƙa da halin rashin ɗabi'a ta hanyar ɗaliban PhD na iya zama ba tare da misali ba.