I-Critique ye-"Ingabe Ukusetshenziswa Kwezingcolile Kuhlobene Ne-Erectile Functioning? Imiphumela Evela Esigabeni Sokukhula Kwezingxenye Zesiphambano Nezikhathi Ezizayo "(2019)

Isingeniso: Ukuhlangana kwakhe kusho into eyodwa, kodwa uJoshuwa Grubbs uthi omunye

Umcwaningi odabise isintu nge "ubona ukulutha kocansi kocansi"Futhi washo ngandlela-thile"imisebenzi ehluke kakhulu kwezinye izidakamizwa, ”Manje usephendulele ubugagu bakhe ku-ED eyenziwe ngocansi. UJoshua Grubbs's iphepha elisha izimangalo ukuthi abukho ubhadane lwe-ED yentsha, ngesibindi iphetha ngokuqagela kwayo nge:

Ngokubambisana nezincwadi zangaphambili, siphetha ngokuthi kukhona ubufakazi obuncane noma abukho bokuhlangana phakathi kokusebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile kanye no-ED.

Lokhu okushiwo okubili kokubili kungalungile okungahambi kahle:

  1. Empeleni, le Grubbs entsha isifundo ngempela uthole lokho bomunye ukusetshenziswa kobulili obuyinkimbinkimbi (ukulutha kocansi) futhi Amazinga aphezulu ekusetshenzisweni kobulili ayehlobene abampofu ukusebenza erectile kuzo zonke izibonelo ze-3.
  2. Ngokuqondene "nezincwadi zangaphambili," mayelana nezifundo ze-40 uxhumanisa ukusetshenziswa kwe-porn noma ukubheja kwezicathulo ezinkingeni zobulili nokuvusa okuncane ezenzweni zobulili. Empeleni, izifundo zokuqala ze-7 kulolu hlu bonisa ibangela, njengoba abahlanganyeli beqede ukusetshenziswa kwezingcolile kanye nokuphulukisa okungavamile kocansi.

Ukuphazamisa okufanayo ukuthi leli phepha:

  1. ikakhulukazi abantu abangenayo i-erectile disys function
  2. ukukhishwa ngokobulili ngaphandle kokusebenza amadoda, Futhi
  3. izintombi ezifakiwe.

Ngamafuphi, iningi lezinsizwa ezakha "isifo se-ED" (okuyinto laba abalobi abaphika) ashiywe kulolu cwaningo. Kulula ukusho ukuthi ususungulile ukuthi ukusetshenziswa kocansi akuhlotshaniswa nobhadane lwe-ED, uma wenqaba ukutadisha labo abahlupheka kakhulu kwi-ED eyenziwe ngocansi ukuthi abaya ocansini!

As Ukuvuselela kabusha umsunguli I-Gabe Deem wathi mayelana a isifundo esifanayo: "Ukusebenzisa amadoda ane-erections enempilo ukutadisha ukuxhumana phakathi kwe-porn ne-ED kufana nokusebenzisa izifundo ezingenawo umdlavuza ukutadisha ukuxhumana phakathi kokubhema nomdlavuza wamaphaphu." (UGabe uphinde aphuluke e-PIED eqinile, futhi manje kusiza ezinye izinkinga zocansi ezibangelwa ucansi.)

Ngisho noma lolu cwaningo lwe-Grubbs olubhaliwe luthola ukuhlangana phakathi abampofu ukusebenza kocansi kanye kokubili umlutha wezocansi futhi ukusetshenziswa kocansi (ngenkathi kungabandakanyi amadoda angasebenzi ocansini futhi ngenxa yalokho amadoda amaningi ane-ED), leli phepha lifundeka sengathi selikhiphe ngokuphelele i-ED (PIED) eyenziwe ngocansi. Lo mkhankaso awumangazi kulabo abalandele izimangalo zaphambilini zikaDkt Grubbs maqondana no “ubona ukulutha kocansi kocansi"Umkhankaso.

Qaphela: Ngenkathi ucwaningo lubala bobabili uJoshua Grubbs noMateusz Gola njengababhali, uGrubbs ubephethe "Ukutholwa Kwemininingwane," "Ukuhlaziywa Nokuhunyushwa Kwemininingwane," kanye "Nokubhalwa Kwendatshana." UGola ungene ngemuva kweqiniso, wasiza kuphela nge- "Revising It for Intellectual Content." Lona ingane kaJosh Grubbs.

Ake sihlole izinkinga ezisendleleni bese sibika okutholakele:

Ifulegi Elibomvu: Amaqembu e-3 abantu abesilisa ocansini abika ukusebenza okuhle kocansi

Qaphela iminyaka emaphakathi yeqembu ngalinye. Isampula 3 iqukethe ibanga lobudala elithinteka kakhulu yi-porn njengoba kungavamile kwabaneminyaka engu-19 (isampula 1) ukuthuthukisa i-PIED, kuyilapho amadoda aneminyaka engama-40 edlule kuya kuma-60s okuqala (isampula 2) angakhulanga esebenzisa i-porn ye-intanethi.

  1. Isibonelo 1: Abafundi be-Psychology: isilinganiso sobudala 19.8 (N = 147)
  2. Isibonelo se-2: Inhlolovo ye-inthanethi: iminyaka yobudala 46.5 (N = 297)
  3. Isibonelo se-3: Inhlolovo ye-inthanethi: iminyaka yobudala 33.5 (N = 433)

Njengoba lolu cwaningo lwabikwa, wonke amaqembu e-3 ahlomile ngokusebenza kahle nge-erectile (esebenzisa ii-IIEF-5):

Kumasampuli e-3 amadoda asebenza ngokocansi aphinde adle izithombe zobulili ezingcolile, sithole amazinga aphakeme kakhulu e-erectile ukusebenza. (ukugcizelelwa okunikeziwe)

Nakulokhu, lokhu kubangela ukuphazamiseka okukhulu njengoba isifundo sashiya izintombi, amadoda angasebenzi kahle ngokobulili, futhi kunanoma ubani onenkinga enkulu ED: wona kanye amadoda anezinkinga zobulili ezihlobene nocansi kakhulu. Amadoda angabandakanyi kulolu cwaningo abamele ingxenye ebalulekile yabantu, njengoba kuye kwaba nokukhuphuka okukhulu izinsizwa ezingasebenzi kanye namadoda amadoda ngaphansi kwe-40 ene-ED noma i-libido encane eyinkinga.

Kubalulekile ukuqaphela ukuthi i-IIEF-5 (efanekiselwe ngenhla) ihloselwe ukuhlola amadoda kuphela ahlanganyela ocansini (amadoda abenza ucansi). Eqinisweni, udokotela wezokwelapha uthe i-IIEF iqinisekiswe kuphela ngokuqondene nabesilisa abaye baba nobulili emavikini okugcina e-4.

Uma i-ED ephelele eyenziwe nge-porn iyindawo yomsebenzisi we-porn, izinyathelo eziningi ezibonakalayo zivame ukwandulela, kwesinye isikhathi ngeminyaka. Ngakho-ke, izinkinga eziningi zocansi ezihlobene nocansi (kanye namadoda anazo), ngeke zifaneleke ukuhlolwa kusetshenziswa i-IIEF-5. Nazi izingqinamba ezivamile ezibikwe ezinkundleni zokuthola izithombe ezingcolile:

Iqiniso elibi kakhulu lisekelwa okungenani Ucwaningo lwe-7 olubonisa ukusetshenziswa kwe-porn ngokusobala kubangela ukuhlukunyezwa kocansi. Izifundo ezintathu kweziyisithupha bezibandakanya abesilisa abathola ku-anorgasmia ne-libido ephansi, kune-ED. Lezi ezinye izifundo ezimbili bezinengxube yeziguli ezapholisa ukubambezeleka kwe-porn ne-PIED. Ngaphezu kwalokho, ucwaningo olwenziwe ngamadoda afuna ukwelashwa abaphoqeleka ukushaya indlwabu ku-porn kubika ukuthi i-71% yazo yayinezinkinga zocansi, nokubika kwe-33% kuphuze ukujula.

Ngezansi: Ngaphandle kokushiya abaningi (noma ngisho nabaningi) bezinsizwa ezakha "U-ED ubhubhane, "Ucwaningo aluzange lubambe ezinye izinkinga zobulili ezihlobene nocansi ezibikwe ezincwadini nakubasebenzisi abaningi abangabonwayo be-porn.

Ngokuphambene nokuhlaziywa kwesifundo sikaGrubbs (kanye nama-tweets akhe), kokubili umlutha wezocansi futhi Amazinga aphakeme ekusetshenzisweni kocansi ayehlobene nokusebenza okungenasici erectile

Amathiphu wokuqonda izinombolo ezisematafuleni ocwaningo:

I-Zero isho ukuthi akukho ukuhlanganiswa phakathi kwezinguquko ezimbili; I-1.00 isho ukuhlanganiswa okuphelele phakathi kwezinguquko ezimbili. Okukhudlwana inombolo inamandla kakhulu ukulungiswa phakathi kwezinguquko ze-2. Uma inombolo inayo susa uphawu, kusho ukuthi kukhona ukulungiswa okungalungile phakathi kwezinto ezimbili. (Isibonelo, kukhona ukulungiswa okungahambi kahle phakathi kokuzivocavoca nesifo senhliziyo. Ngakho-ke, ngolimi olujwayelekile, ukuvivinya umzimba kuyanciphisa amathuba okuba nesifo senhliziyo. ukuhlanganisa omuhle ngesifo senhliziyo.)

Ingxenye 1: Ukulutha kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile nokusebenza kwe-erectile

Imibuzo ye-4 Grubbs esetshenziselwa ukukala amazinga wokusebenzisa i-porno enenkinga (ukulutha kwezidakamizwa) kwakuyi:

  1. Ngikholelwa ukuthi ngiyisidakwa sezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-intanethi
  2. Ngizizwa ngingakwazi ukuyeka ukusebenzisa kwami ​​izithombe ezingcolile zobulili
  3. Ngisho nalapho ngingathandi ukubuka izithombe zobulili ezingcolile kuyi-intanethi, ngizizwa ngidonsela kuso
  4. Ngiyeke izinto engangizidingayo ukuze ngibheke izithombe zobulili ezingcolile

Umfundi wezingxenye zephepha lesingeniso noma lezingxoxo angahle aphuthelwe yiqiniso, kepha kokubili Izinga lokusebenzisa izithombe ezingcolile kanye namazinga wokusetshenziswa kobulili obuyinkimbinkimbi (ukulutha kwezidakamizwa) zazihlobene nezilinganiso eziphansi ku-IIEF-5 ( I-International Index ye-Erectile Umsebenzi), okubonisa ukusebenza okunciphile kwe-erectile. Noma kunjalo, ngisho nabalobi do vuma ukuthi umlutha wezithombe zobulili ezingcolile uhlobene nokusebenza okungenasici erectile:

Ngokufanayo, kwakukhona ubudlelwane obubi obungaguquki phakathi kokusebenza kwe-erectile nezithombe zobulili ezingcolile eziyinkimbinkimbi zisebenzisa kuzo zonke amasampuli e-3, nakuba lobu buhlobo buyi- okuncane kakhulu ukulinganisa ubukhulu (r = -0.20 kuya -0.33) futhi akazange alondoloze ukubaluleka kokubaluleka kwesampula 1 ngemuva kokulungiswa kwe-Holm.

Khumbula, izibonakaliso ezimbi zisho izilinganiso eziphansi kwi-IIEF, okusho ukusebenza okuncane kakhulu kwe-erectile. Imiphumela iveza ukuthi ngisho nasezifundweni ezinempilo erectile enempilo, ukubheja kwezicabha kakhulu hlobene ne abampofu izinketho.

Lindela umzuzu owubuzayo, ngingathini ukukhuluma kakhulu ahlobene? Ingabe isifundo asicashuni ngenhla ukuthi ngobuhlobo ubuhlobo (-0.20 kuya -0.33) bekungukuthi "kuncane ukuya kokulinganiselwe," okusho ukuthi akuyona into enkulu?

Njengoba sizohlola ngokuningiliziwe ngezansi, ukusetshenziswa kwezincazelo zikaGrubb kuyehluka ngokuphawulekayo, kuya ngokuthi ufunda ini leGrubbs. Uma ucwaningo lweGrubbs lumayelana nokusetshenziswa kocansi okubangela i-ED, izinombolo ezingenhla zimelela ukuhlangana okuncane, okujikijelwe eceleni ekubhaleni kwakhe okugcwele izikhala.

Kodwa-ke, uma ngabe isifundo sikaDubbs esidume kakhulu ("Ukuguquka njengesiyaluyalu: Ukwethembeka nokuziphatha okungavumelani njengababikezeli bokulimala okubonakalayo ku-Pornography"), Lapho amemezela khona ukuthi ukuba yinkolo kwakuyimbangela yangempela" yokulutha kabi kocansi, "bese kuba izinombolo ezincane kunokuba lezi zakha "ubuhlobo obuqinile." Empeleni, Ukuhlangana "okuqinile" kukaGrubbs phakathi kwenkolo kanye "nokulutha kwezithombe zocansi" bekungokwakho kuphela 0.30! Noma kunjalo wawasebenzisa ngokucophelela ukuba athathe a entsha, futhi engabazayo, imodeli yokulutha kwezidakamizwa. Amatafula, ukuhambelana nemininingwane okukhulunywa ngayo lapha itholakala lesi sigaba sokuhlaziywa kweYBOP eside.

Esifundweni samanje se-ED, kubalulekile ukuqaphela ukuthi ukuhlangana okuqine kakhulu phakathi kokulutha kocansi kanye nokwenziwa kwabampofu (-0.33) kwenzeke kusampula enkulu kaGrubbs. Lokhu kwaba yi kuphela Isampula seminyaka yobudala iningi kakhulu lokubika i-porn edonswe ED: isampula 3, isilinganiso seminyaka: 33.5 (Izihloko ze-433).

Ingxenye 2: Ukusebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile kanye nokusebenza kwe-erectile

Ngesikhathi leli phepha lihlala lihlupha phansi ukusebenzisana phakathi kokusebenzisa izithombe ezingcolile zobulili ezingcolile kanye nokuvinjelwa okubuhlungu, ukuhambelana ngamashumi kubikiwe kuwo wonke amaqembu we-3 - ikakhulukazi isampula i-3, eyayiyisampula efanelekayo njengoba nje kuchaziwe. Ingcaphuno yokufunda:

Nokho, ngaphandle kwe isampula i-3, kade kukhona ubufakazi obuncane kokuxhumanisa phakathi kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile zisebenza ngokwawo kanye nokusebenza kwe-erectile. Ngaphakathi amasampuli 1 no-2, izixhumanisi phakathi kokusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile kanye nokusebenza kwe-erectile zazihlala zibuthakathaka futhi zingabalulekile

Ngezansi amaqembu e-3, nemizuzu yabo ejwayelekile yansuku zonke yokubuka izithombe zobulili ezingcolile kanye nokuhlobana phakathi kokusebenza okusebenzayo kwe-erectile (uphawu olungalungile lusho ukuphazamisa okubuhlungu okuhlobene nokusetshenziswa kocansi okukhulu):

  1. Isibonelo se-1 (amadoda we-147): yobudala obuphakathi 19.8 - Kubekwe eceleni 22 imizuzu ye-porn / usuku. (-0.18)
  2. Isibonelo se-2 (amadoda we-297): yobudala obuphakathi 46.5 - Isilinganiso 13 imizuzu ye-porn / usuku. (-0.05)
  3. Isibonelo se-3 (amadoda we-433): yobudala obuphakathi 33.5 - Isilinganiso 45 imizuzu ye-porn / usuku. (-0.37)

Imiphumela eqondile efanelekile: isampula ebisebenzisa kakhulu i-porn (# 3) ibinokuxhumana okuqine kakhulu phakathi kokusebenzisa kakhulu ama-porn nama-erections ampofu, kanti iqembu elisebenzisa okuncane (# 2) lalinokuhlangana okubuthakathaka kakhulu phakathi kokusebenzisa kakhulu ama-porn nama-erections ampofu. Kungani uGrubbs engazange agcizelele le pateni ekubhaleni kwakhe, esikhundleni sokusebenzisa iziqalo zezibalo ukuzama ukuthi inyamalale?

Ukufingqa:

  • Isibonelo #1: Isilinganiso seminyaka 19.8 - Qaphela ukuthi abasebenzisi be-porn abaneminyaka engu-19 abanqabile ukuthi babika izithombe ezingcolile ezingcolile (ikakhulukazi uma usebenzisa imizuzu engu-22 ngosuku). Iningi lalabo Izindaba ze-ED zokuvuselela izithombe zocansi I-YBOP ihlangene ngamadoda ase-20-40. Ngokuvamile kuthatha isikhathi ukuthuthukisa i-PIED.
  • Isampula # 2: Isilinganiso seminyaka engu-46.5 - Babeke amaminithi angu-13 kuphela ngosuku! Ngokwehlukana okujwayelekile kweminyaka engu-15.3, enye ingxenye yala madoda yayingamashumi amahlanu-into. La madoda amadala awazange aqale ukusebenzisa i-Internet ye-porn ngesikhathi sokukhula (okwenza kube lula ukuthi bangabhekana nokuvusa ukuvuswa kwabo ngokobulili kuphela kwi-inthanethi ye-intanethi). Ngempela, njengoba nje uGrubbs etholakele, impilo yezocansi yamadoda asekhulile kancane ayelokhu engcono futhi enamandla kakhulu kunabo bonke, kunabasebenzisi abaqala ukusebenzisa i-digital digital ngesikhathi sokukhula (njengalabo abaneminyaka yobudala be-33 kusampula 3).
  • Isibonelo #3: Isilinganiso seminyaka engu-33.5 - Njengoba sekushiwo, isampula 3 kwakuyisampula enkulu kakhulu kanye namazinga aphakeme kakhulu okusetshenziswa kocansi. Okubaluleke kakhulu, leli banga lobudala yilona elibika kakhulu i-PIED. Akumangalisi ukuthi isampula 3 yayinokuhlangana okuqine kakhulu phakathi kwamazinga aphezulu okusetshenziswa kocansi nokusebenza okumpofu kwe-erectile (-0.37).

Ukucabangela lezi zixhumanisi ezingenhla phakathi kwezinto eziphuthumayo kanye kokubili ukusetshenziswa okukhulu kwe-porn futhi umlutha wezocansi, kuyashaqisa ukuthi leli phepha leGrubbs lifundeka kanjani sengathi landa i-porn ye-inthanethi Ayikwazi zihlobene ukunyuka okubhalwe ku-ED kumadoda angaphansi kwe-40. Futhi, kungani iGubbs ingayinaki ukusebenzisana okuqinile eqenjini elidala kakhulu elithintekayo yi-PIED futhi ngubani obika ukusetshenziswa okukhulu kwe-porn? Ingabe wayengazi ukuthi iminyaka yobudala ethinteka yizinkinga zocansi ezibangelwa ucansi?

Kalula nje, ukube lolu cwaningo belukhulume kuphela ngesampula # 3 (okusobala ukuthi kwakuyisampula lokuqala uGrubbs aqoqiwe), uGrubbs wayezophoqeleka (siyethemba) ukwamukela ubudlelwane be-porn nokungasebenzi kahle kocansi. Esikhundleni salokho, amasampula amabili angaphandle kwebanga lobudala obelibhekiwe, engezwa ngemuva kokuqoqwa kwamazinga okuqala esampula # 3. Lokhu kunisele phansi okutholakele kokuqala nokufanele kakhulu (isampula # 3).

AmaGrubbs: Uma kuyinkolo ebangela ukulutheka kocansi, u-0.30 "unamandla." Uma kuyi-porn edala i-ED, u-0.37 "ubufakazi obunqunyelwe."

Njengoba kushiwo ngenhla, i-Grubbs iye yasetshenziswa ngokungahambisani ngokungahambisani nemibono ebuthakathaka kunelabo ababikiwe ekutadisheni kwe-ED okwamanje ukuze benze amandla kakhulu futhi izimangalo ezingabaza ezifundweni zakhe ezaziwa kakhulu. Isimangalo sikaGrubbs sodumo luchungechunge lwakhe “ukubhekwa kwezidakamizwa ezingcolile”, Ezaveza isimemezelo esingasekelwa ngokwesayensi sokuthi“ inkolo ibangela ukulutha kwezocansi. ” Kuyinkimbinkimbi kakhulu ukukhipha lapha, i-YBOP (nabaphenyi bangempela) badilize izimangalo ezingasekelwa zikaGrubbs kwenye indawo: isihloko se-1, isihloko se-2, isihloko se-3.

Kodwa-ke, ngaphambi kokushiya leli phuzu, hlola imininingwane ephepheni elicashunwe kakhulu likaGrubbs: “Ukuguquka njengesiyaluyalu: Ukwethembeka nokuziphatha okungavumelani njengababikezeli bokulimala okubonakalayo ku-Pornography. " Ithebula 2 ngezansi liqukethe idatha evela kumasampuli ahlukene ama-2. Okuqokonyiswe ngezansi kukhona ukuxhumana phakathi kwemibuzo yemibuzo yokusebenzisa i-porn ye-Grubbs, i-CPUI-9 (# 1), ne-Religiosity (# 6).

Nakhu okumele ukwenze engqondweni lapho ufunda zonke izifundo zikaGrubbs ezibonakalayo: zokulutha: waphinde waqamba igama le- Inani Amaphuzu we-CPUI-9 njengokuthi "umlutha wezithombe zocansi obonwayo" - noma bekungesiwo umbono wokulutha umlutha. Lokhu kuyadida, kepha kunamasu aphezulu, njengoba izifundo zakhe nokuphawula kwakhe ezinkundleni zokuxhumana kufundeka sengathi uhlola "ukukholelwa ekuluthekeni kwezocansi," yize engakwenzanga lokho. Ngakho-ke lapho uGrubbs ethi inkolo ngokuqinile okuhlobene "nokulutha kwezilonda kocansi okubonakalayo," usho ngempela ukuthi inkolo imane nje ihlobene namaphuzu aphelele ku-CPUI-9 yakhe, uhlu lwemibuzo olungacabangeli oluhlola futhi umlutha wangempela wezocansi noma azikholelwa ukuthi ungumlutha wezithombe zobulili ezingcolile.

Ukuhlobana phakathi kwama-CPUI-9 izikolo nezikolo: Isifundo 1: 0.25, Study 2: 0.35

  • Isilinganiso: 0.30

Yini uDkt. Grubbs athi ngayo 0.30 ubudlelwane phakathi "kokubona ukulutha kwezithombe zocansi" kanye nenkolo? Ingani, yathi "yayinamandla!"

Imiphumela evela ezifundweni ezimbili ezisekelweni ze-undergraduate (Isifundo 1, N = 331; Isifundo 2, N = 97) sibonisiwe ukuthi kwakukhona Okuqinile ubuhlobo obuhle phakathi kokukholwa nenkohliso ebonakalayo yezithombe zobulili ezingcolile.

I-Grubbs iyabheka 0.30 "Ngamandla" lapho isekela imeme yakhe eyenziwe ngobuciko yokuthi abantu benkolo "babona" ​​ukuthi bangumlutha wezocansi futhi akekho omunye onenkinga ngakho.

Esifundweni samanje se-ED, uGrubbs uchaze kanjani ukuhlobana phakathi kokusetshenziswa kocansi okukhulu kanye nokwakhiwa kwabampofu, kufaka phakathi isampula 3 - ebinokuhlangana okukhulu (0.37), kunesifundo sakhe "senkolo = umlutha wezocansi" esichazwe nje?

“Ngale amasampuli e-3, sithole kuphela kuncane kakhulu ukusekela umbono wokuthi izithombe zobulili ezingcolile zisebenza ngokwawo zihlobene nokunciphisa ukusebenza kwe-erectile, okungahambisani nomunye umlando odumile othi ukusetshenziswa okunjalo kungenzeka kubangele ukungasebenzi ngokocansi. ” (kugcizelelwa)

Ku-2019, i-Grubbs iyabheka 0.37 njengo "ukwesekwa okulinganiselwe kakhulu" kokuxhumanisa phakathi kokusebenzisa i-porn nokusebenza kwe-erectile empofu. Ngabe imibono kaGrubbs ngezibalo iguquke eminyakeni engu-4 engenele noma kungaba enye into?

Sibheka isikhangiso, futhi manje ubuyekeze ithebula elingenhla kusukela eGrubbs "Ukuguquka njengesiyaluyalu" funda ukusekela ukuqinisekiswa kwethu. Ngaphezulu sasiqokomisa ukuhlobana phakathi kwama-CPUI-9 izikolo (ukubhekwa kwezidakamizwa ezingcolile) futhi inkolo. Ngezansi siqokomise ukuhlangana phakathi kwezinguquko ze-CPUI-9 (ukubhekwa kwezidakamizwa ezingcolile) kanye "amahora wokusebenzisa i-porn":

Ukuhlobana phakathi kwamanani we-CPUI-9 (okubonwa ukuthi umlutha wezitho zobulili ezingcolile) kanye "namahora wokusetshenziswa kocansi": Study 1: 0.30, Study 2: 0.32

  • Isilinganiso se-0.31

Qaphela ukuthi izikolo ze-CPUI-9 zinayo kunamandla kakhulu ubudlelwane "namahora wokusetshenziswa kocansi" (0.31) kunokukholelwa enkolweni (0.30). Ngokumane nje, amahora we-porn angumqageli ongcono "obonwa ukubheja kocansi" kunokwenkolo. “Ukusetshenziswa kabi kocansi = umlutha wezocansi,” hhayi “Inkolo = umlutha wezocansi.” Ngisho nasemsebenzini kaGrubbs uqobo.

Noma kunjalo uGrubbs usiqinisekisa ukuthi inkolo "ihlobene ngokuqinile nomlutha we-porn”(Izikolo ze-CPUI-9). Uma kunjalo, khona-ke "amahora wokusetshenziswa kocansi" ngokusobala nawo "ahlobene ngokuqinile" namanani ku-CPUI-9. Kepha akusikho okukhothozayo ngokufunda ukuhlaziywa kukaGrubbs, noma kumazwana akhe abezindaba noma okuphakelayo kwakhe kwe-Twitter.

Ngempela, i-Grubbs ihlanganisa umkhankaso wakhe kulokhu ukuhleleka okungajwayelekile kwe-2016 Psychology Today esihlokweni, lapho efaka amanga ukuthi izikolo ze-CPUI-9 (ezibonwa ukulutha kwezilonda ezingcolile) azihlobene nomthamo osetshenzisiwe we-porn, kodwa kuphela ehlobene nenkolo:

Ukubizwa ngokuthi "i-porn addict" ngumlingani wakho, noma ngisho ngokwakho, ine Lutho ukukwenza nenani le-porn umuntu abheka ngayo, kusho uJoshua Grubbs, uprofesa othisha wezokwelapha e-Bowling Green University. Kunalokho, ine yonke intog ukukwenza reukulinganisa...

... I-Grubbs iyibiza ngokuthi "ubona ukulutha kocansi kocansi. "" Isebenza ngokuhluke kakhulu kwezinye izidakamizwa. "(Kugcizelelwa okunikezwayo)

Lezi yizitatimende ezishaqisayo eziphikisana ngqo nokutholakele kwakhe. Njengoba amatafula ekhombisa, izikolo ze-CPUI-9 ("ukubonwa njengeziyizidakamizwa zocansi") empeleni bezihlobene kakhulu "namahora okusetshenziswa" kunenkolo! Ukuqinisekiswa okunjalo okungasekelwa kuholele i-YBOP ukushicilela ukucubungula okubanzi yezifundo zikaDkt Grubbs ezaziwayo zokulutha kwezocansi.

Manje, kufanele sikwenze futhi ngaleli phepha le-ED yamanje, lapho akhiqiza khona ukubhala okushiya ukuhlanganiswa okuphawulekayo (ikakhulukazi eqenjini elisengozini kakhulu), ushiya izifundo eziningi ezixhumanisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile nezinkinga zobulili, futhi ihlambalaza izincwadi ezinkingeni zobulili ezinsizweni. Isithombe lesi sithombe sibhale ukufanisa noma idatha yakhe noma i- isimo samanje sezincwadi. Ngokudabukisayo, i-Grubbs yabe isetshenziselwa ukuphazamisa ukuxhumana kwayo ku-twitter:

Esikhathini seDkt Grubbs se-bizzaro-stats world view, I-0.37 ayitholakali (ukuhlangana phakathi kokusebenzisa i-porn nokusebenza kwe-erectile empofu), ngenkathi I-0.30 inamandla (ukuhlobana phakathi kokukholelwa kanye nokulutha kocansi okubonakalayo).

Umdlalo wegobolondo wesampula?

Ukubuyela odabeni lwamasampuli kaGrubbs, ulwazi olujwayelekile ezinkundleni zokuthola izithombe ezingcolile zobulili ukuthi iqembu labesilisa njengamanje elibika ngezinkinga zocansi ezibangelwa ucansi kakhulu lihamba cishe ngasekupheleni kweminyaka yama-20s nasekuqaleni kwawo-30. Ngamanye amagama, ngamasampuli amathathu kaGrubbs, isampula elungele kakhulu ukuphenya into engenzeka yokungasebenzi kahle kocansi okubangelwa ucansi kwakuyisampula 3.

Isibonelo se-3 (isilinganiso seminyaka engu-33.5) asiyona isampula esiseduze kakhulu eqenjini elidala elihle, kodwa futhi likhulu kunazo zonke, futhi ngenxa yalokho, elithembekile kakhulu, lamasampuli akhe.

Ngokuthakazelisayo, isampula i-3 ibonakala iyona kuqala amasampula ama-Grubbs aqoqwe (entwasahlobo ka-2017). Ngaphambi kwesikhathi, isampula i-3 ibonise ukuhlangana okuqinile phakathi kwezempilo erectile engafanele nokusetshenziswa kocansi (0.37) kanye nokulutha kwezidakamizwa (0.33) esisezingeni eliyisisekelo - yize noma ngabe amadoda amaningi angasebenzi kahle ngokobulili abekwe (okuyisisekelo?) ngaphandle kokusetshenziswa kwe-IIEF.

Lokhu kuphakamisa imibuzo engalungile. Kungani uGubbs engabhale imiphumela yakhe kuphela mayelana nalesi sampula i-3, iqembu elisesengozini kakhulu? Ukube wayenjalo, lokhu bekuyoba iphepha elihluke kakhulu ... enikeza ukusekela okuqinile kokukhona kwezinkinga zempilo ye-erectile eyenziwe ngocansi (singethemba).

Kwakungenxa yokuthi uGrubbs akazange like ukuhlobana okunamandla phakathi kwezempilo erectile empofu kanye kokubili ukusetshenziswa kocansi nokulutha kwezilonda, okuyinto isampula sakhe esisebenzayo, esithembekile kunazo zonke esivezwe? Kungani efihlile imiphumela yakhe efanele ngokufaka ama-sampuli angaphezu kuka-2 wamadoda kusuka emaqenjini aphansi angengozi?

Iqembu le-Longitudinal labona ushintsho oluncane emsebenzini we-erectile, kodwa abasebenzisi abanezinkinga kungenzeka ukuthi baphumile

Ucwaningo luthi kusixhumanisi sesampula le-longitudinal (# 3) phakathi kokusebenzisa i-porn / ukuluthwa kwe-porn akuzange kube nomthelela ekusebenzeni kwe-erectile esikhathini sonyaka ongu-1

Ngamafuphi, ukusetshenziswa kobuciko bokuzihlamba okuzibiza ngokweqile akuzange kuhlotshaniswe nezinguquko ekusebenzeni kwe-erectile ngaphezu kwesikhathi se-1, cishe ngenxa yokuntuleka kweshintsho ekusebenzeni kwe-erectile kusampula jikelele.

Ake sihlole lokhu okutholakele. Okokuqala, kubalulekile ukwazi ukuthi kubahlanganyeli abangama-433 eqenjini # 3 ekuqaleni, ababambiqhaza abayi-117 kuphela babenemininingwane ephelele yonyaka wonke (amaphuzu emininingwane emi-4 nezikhawu ezi-4). Lokho kungama-27% amancane abahlanganyeli bokuqala, lapho iGrubbs isekela lesi simangalo.

Okwesibili, kubonakala sengathi izifundo ezazisebenzisa i-porn kakhulu, futhi zaba nezinkinga eziningi (ukulutha), yizo ezazithanda ukuphuma ocwaningweni. Ithebula 3 lembula ukwehla kwesilinganiso "samahora wokusetshenziswa kocansi" kanye nezikolo zokulutha izidakamizwa ezitholakala ngokungena ngakunye okuphumelelayo. Kuphakathi kokuthi bonke abesilisa banciphise ukusetshenziswa kocansi futhi bazizwa bengamlutha kangako, noma abasebenzisi abaningi abasindayo abanezinkinga ezinkulu baphuma. Lesi sakamuva sibonakala singenzeka.

Kuzo zombili lezi zizathu sidinga ukuthatha idatha yolwazi olude lwesifundo ngedwala likasawoti.

I-Grubbs isebenzisa ukucabanga okucacile ukusikisela ukuthi "ukungaziphathi kahle kokuziphatha" kungahle kuchaze ukusebenza kwe-erectile empofu

I-Grubbs iqinisekisa ukuthi "i-Moral Incongruence" ingadlala indima ku-ED, kodwa idlala imidlalo:

Ngaphezu kwalokho, siyaqaphela ukuthi kusampula ye-1 (isampula i-3) lapho izithombe zobulili ezingcolile zisebenza khona zihlobene nokunciphisa ukusebenza kwe-erectile, kokubili ukusetshenziswa okubikisayo okubikiwe futhi zokuziphatha incongruencemayelana nokusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile kwakuhlobene nokuhlobene nokusebenza kwe-erectile, zombili zazo ngaphezu kokuhlobana phakathi kokusetshenziswa okubikiwe nokunciphisa ukusebenza kwe-erectile. Uma lezi zitholakele zicatshangelwa kanye nemiphumela evela kwezinye izibonelo zethu ze-2 ezingabonisi ubudlelwane obucacile phakathi kokusetshenziswa kocansi nokusetshenziswa kwe-erectile, siyanxusa ngokubeka ukukholelwa ezitatimendeni zezithombe zobulili ezingcolile zisebenzise ngokwayo njengendlela yokwenza ucwaningo lwe-ED. (ukugcizelelwa okunikeziwe)

I-MI (incongruence yokuziphatha) ingukuthi njalo kuhlobene nokulutha kocansi (imibuzo kaGrubbs engu-4 efakwe kuhlu ekuqaleni), ngoba abantu abanomlutha wezocansi bavame ukufuna ukuma ngenxa yemiphumela emibi. Njengoba i-MI ihlale ihlobene nokulutha kocansi, futhi ukusebenza kwe-erectile okumpofu njalo kuhlobene nokulutha kocansi, ama-MI izikolo ahlobene nokusebenza kwe-erectile empofu. Ngakho-ke, ukugomela kukaGrubbs kuyinto yobuciko, hhayi ukuhlobana okunengqondo.

Qaphela: I-Grubbs ilokhu izama uqinisekise umphakathi wesayense iminyaka engu-8 ukuthi ukulutha kabi kocansi akuyona nje into ebizwa ngokuthi "ukungaziphathi kahle kokuziphatha" (noma inkolo). Okusho ukuthi, ukungavumi ukusetshenziswa komuntu ocindezelayo kuyinkinga yangempela - hhayi i-porn iyazisebenzisa. Impi yakhe ixhomeke embonweni ongasekelwa wokuthi ukungavumelani nokuziphatha komuntu ngokusetshenziswa ngokweqile kuhlukile kulabo abayimilutha yezocansi. Kodwa-ke, lokhu kubuyekezwa kwezincwadi kuveza okusobala. Izidakamizwa ngokuvamile azivumelani nemilutha yazo. Lapha izidakamizwa izidakamizwa ziveza izizathu zokuziphatha njengesisusa esiyinhloko sokuyeka:

UGrubbs kufanele azibuze, “Kungani ingekho imodeli 'yokungavumi ukuziphatha' yokulutha imeth, noma ukugembula, noma ukubhema ugwayi?” Imodeli 'yokungavunyelwa ngokokuziphatha yokulutha kabi kocansi' iyi-herring ebomvu eyenziwe nguGrubbs uqobo. Yenziwe futhi yasekelwa yizifundo zakhe eziphindaphindwayo ezihlanganisa ukungavumelani nokuziphatha nokulutha kocansi (kanye neqembu lakhe labalandeli), ngenkathi engazinaki ezinye izinto eziningi ezibalulekile ezichaza kangcono ukusetshenziswa kwezinkinga zocansi (njengokuhluleka ukuyeka yize kunemiphumela emibi).

Iqiniso yilokho Izifundo ze-51 zezinzwa bonisa ukuthi umlutha wezocansi usebenza kakhulu njengezinye izidakamizwa. Futhi nezifundo zikaGrubbs uqobo zakhe ziveza njalo ukuthi "kubonwa ukulutha kwezithombe zocansi" kunokuningi okuphathelene nenani le-porny umuntu elibukwayo.

UJosh Grubbs uzibandakanya ne-radical pro-porn, anti-PIED propagandists uNicole Prause noDavid Ley (futhi uba yilungu yingaboy)

UDkt Grubbs ubonakala ehlotshaniswa kakhulu nabantu abasebenza ngokuziphatha okubi kwezocansi uDkt Nicole Prause noDkt David Ley. Bobathathu bavame ukuthanda nokuphinda babhale omunye nomunye amazwana, bangene ezihlangwini ezihlangene ze-Twitter convos ezihlekisayo ezihlobene nokusetshenziswa kabi kwe-porn kwe-inthanethi. Yonke le mikhankaso emithathu emelene nomqondo wokuthi “umlutha wezocansi.” ULey noGrubbs banakho amaphepha abuyekezwe ngontanga abambisene nabo, kanye neLey kanye nePrause babe nomlomo uphikise izifundo zikaGrubbs "ezibonakalayo zokulutha" kusukela owokuqala evele.

UKUZIVIKELA: Ku 2019, UJoshua Grubbs ukuqinisekisile ukukhetha kwakhe okuqhutshwa yi-ajenda lapho bobabili ngokusemthethweni uhlanganyele nomfelandawonye Nicole Prause futhi UDavid Ley ekuzameni ukuthula YourBrainOnPorn.com. AmaGrubbs nabanye “ochwepheshe” be-pro-porn ku-www.realyourbrainonporn.com bayazibandakanya ukuphulwa komkhiqizo ongekho emthethweni nokuqhekeka. Ofundayo kufanele akwazi lokho I-RealYBOP twitter (ngokuvunywa okusobala kochwepheshe bayo) nayo ibandakanyeka ekungcolisweni nasekuhlukumezeni UGary Wilson, Alexander Rhodes, I-Gabe Deem kanye ne-NCOSE, ULilala Mickelwait, Gail Dines, Futhi noma ngubani okhuluma ngokulimala kwe-porn. I-Prause (ubani isebenza i-RealYBOP twitter) kubonakala ngathi ehle kakhulu embonini yezocansi, futhi isebenzisa i-RealYBOP twitter ukuze gqugquzela imboni yezocansi, ukuvikela i-PornHub (ebisingatha amavidiyo wokushushumbisa izingane ngokocansi nangokobulili), futhi hlasela labo abasigqugquzela isicelo ukubamba I-PornHub iyaphendulwa. Sikholwa ukuthi "ochwepheshe" beRealBB kufanele bacelwe ukuthi babhale ubulungu babo be-RealYBOP njengokuthi "ukungqubuzana kwezintshisakalo" ezincwadini zabo ezibuyekezwe ontanga.

Ngakho-ke akumangazi ukuthi uLey noPrause thanda lolu cwaningo lwe-Grubbs lwamanje (okungenani ukubhala kwakhe, uma kungenjalo okwangempela ukuhlangana). Kule ntambo ye-Twitter, uPrause uphakamisa, ngaphandle kwesisekelo esizwakalayo, ukuthi ukuhlangana "kokungavumi kokuziphatha" kungasho ukuthi izinkinga zokwakhiwa zibangelwa yi-porn ... .ihlazo. UGrubbs ubonakala evumelana nozakwabo:

Ley and Prause akuzona izibukeli ezihlose. Bobabili babe wabamba izigameko eziningi ezibhalwe phansi zokuhlukunyezwa nokuhlukunyezwa njengengxenye yomkhankaso we "astroturf" oqhubekayo wokukholisa abantu ukuthi noma ngubani ongavumelani neziphetho zabo kufanele ahlonishwe. Ukudumisa kunjengokuthi ehle kakhulu embonini yezocansi, njengoba kungabonakala kulokhu isithombe sakhe (ngakwesokudla) emgqeni obomvu we-X-Rated Critics Organization (XRCO) umkhosi wemiklomelo. Ngokwe-Wikipedia “i I-XRCO Awards anikezwa yiMelika Izinkampani zokuhlaziya ezibalwe ngu-X minyaka yonke kubantu abasebenza kwezokuzijabulisa kwabantu abadala. Kuwukuphela kwemiklomelo embonini yabantu abadala show igcinelwe kuphela amalungu embonini.[1]“(Kugcizelelwe ukugcizelelwa)

UDavid Ley akabandakanyi nje kuphela ngezigameko ezimbalwa ezandulele, uphinde washicilela izihloko eziningi ukuhlaselwa amaforamu okubuyisa ama-porn futhi Umqondo wezinhlelo ezingcolile zobulili wadala i-ED ukuphazamisa amadoda ngubani ophethe amaforamu okubuyisa ama-porn bese usebenzisa imithombo yezokuxhumana ukuhlukumeza amadoda alulame kusuka ku-PIED. Ngokushayisana kwezimali okusobala kwezintshisekelo, uDavid Ley uyikho ukunxephezelwa imboni ye-porn eyi-X-hamster ukukhuthaza amawebhusayithi abo kanye nokuqinisekisa abasebenzisi ukuthi ukulutha kabi kocansi nokulutha ngokocansi kuyizinganekwane! Ngokuqondile, uDavid Ley kanye nabasanda kusungulwa I-Alliance Health Alliance (SHA) babe lihlanganyele ne-X-Hamster iwebhusayithi (Strip-Chat). Bona "I-Stripchat ihlangana ne-Health Health Alliance ukushaya ubuchopho bakho obukhathazekile be-porn-centric“. Ngaphezu kwalokho, uLee wenza imali ngokuthengisa izincwadi ezimbili eziphika umlutha wezocansi nezocansi ("Inganekwane Yokulutha Ngokobulili, ” 2012 futhi "I-Porn Ethical for Dicks, ” I-2016). Ingabe lokho kungqubuzana nentshisekelo? I-Pornhub ingenye yeziphakamiso ezine zokubuyisela emuva kwencwadi ku-Amazon.com.

Futhi manje sinoJosh Grubbs, onayo co-authored iphephandaba izihloko no-Buddy David Ley, bejoyina uLey ngokuhlekisa u-ED:

Le tweet kaGrubbs ivela ngoMeyi, i-2017 - ngaphezulu kwezinyanga ze-18 ngaphambi kokuthi ashicilele iphepha lakhe lamanje elithi "debunking" elenza i-ED. Ucwasa noma ubani?

UNicole Prause uyaqhubeka nokukhathazeka nge-PIED eyisikweletu, njengoba echithe iminyaka engu-5 edlule ehlukumeza futhi ekhulula izinsizwa esezilulile ekuziphatheni okubi ngokobulili futhi zizama ukuxwayisa abanye. Bona imibhalo: I-Gabe Deem #1, I-Gabe Deem #2, U-Alexander Rhodes #1, U-Alexander Rhodes #2, U-Alexander Rhodes #3, I-Noah Church, U-Alexander Rhodes #4, U-Alexander Rhodes #5, U-Alexander Rhodes #6, U-Alexander Rhodes #7, U-Alexander Rhodes #8, U-Alexander Rhodes #9, Alexander Rhodes # 10, Alex Rhodes # 11, UGabe Deem no-Alex Rhode ndawonye # 12, Alexander Rhodes # 13, U-Alexander Rhodes #14, IGabe Deem # 4, U-Alexander Rhodes #15.

Ngaphezu kwalokho, uPrause (ngosizo lukaLey) usebenze i- Impi ye-4 yeminyaka ngokubuyekezwa okubandakanya odokotela bakwa-7 US Navy noGary Wilson (eshicilelwe encwadini Sciences Behavioral): Ingabe Izithombe Zobulili Ezingcolile Zase-Internet Zibangela Ukuhlukunyezwa Ngokobulili? Ukubukezwa Ngemibiko Yomtholampilo (Park et al., 2016). (Ngaphezulu kokubona okuningi: Imizamo yePrause yokuba nephepha lokubukeza iSayensi yezobuLwazi (Park et al., 2016) ihlehlisiwe.) UJoshua Grubbs usanda kujoyina uPrause noLey kulo mkhankaso ongenamsebenzi nokungahambi kahle Park et al. I-2016 kanye ne-MDPI, ehlaselwa ekuhlaselweni kwe-ad hominem, amanga, nokuhlukunyezwa kwe-cyber.

Isibonelo sokuqala: ngoFebhuwari 16, i-2019, isazi sezokwelapha ngocansi sanikeza inkulumo ku- I-21st Congress ye-European Society yezokwelapha ekuthintekeni kwe-Inthanethi kwezocansi. Amaslayidi ambalwa achaza izinkinga zocansi ezibangelwa ucansi, ucacise Park et al., 2016, babethulwe nge-tweeted. Ama-tweets abangela uNicole Prause, uDavid Ley, uJoshua Grubbs kanye nabalingani babo ukuqondisa ukuthukuthela kwe-Twitter Park et al., 2016. Kule ntambo I-Grubbs ijoyina i-Prause esimweni sakhe samanga evamile samanga nokuhlaselwa kwe-ad hominem:

Konke lokhu okungenhla kuyi-defamation engenalutho njengoba kubonisiwe lapha. Qaphela ukuthi kuwo wonke ama-Prause, Ley, nama-Grubbs ama-tweets abangeke ahlinzeke isibonelo esisodwa se-"ukukhwabanisa" kwephepha noma "izimangalo zamanga." Ukuhlaselwa kwe-ad hominen kuphela namanga. Njengoba uPrause wayengomunye wababuyekezi abayisithupha Park et al., ungacabanga ukuthi angakwazi ukucaphuna isigaba bese uchaza ukuthi lithini "ukukhwabanisa." Ungalokothi kwenzeke .... futhi ngeke kwenzeke ngoba leli phepha alikho ukukhwabanisa futhi yonke imithetho ye-Navy yahambisana nokuhlanganiswa kwayo.

I-Grubbs ayihlaselwe kuphela Park et al. ne-Prause-njengenjini engenalutho, futhi wahlasela ngokungenasisekelo iphephandaba lomzali MDPI (njengoba nje u-Prause uyenzile ngokuphindaphindiwe). I-smear emibili ye-tweet kusukela ngoJanuwari, i-2019:

Imininingwane engeziwe ama-tweets akhaza i-MDPI. Ngalesi sikhathi kucashunwe "i-poll."

Lapha uya futhi, ukuhlasela i-MDPI:

I-Grubbs ihlasele i-MDPI futhi Park et al. uqale cishe ngesikhathi eshicilela lona kanye iphepha elihloliwe kuleli khasi. Kwaqondana? Akunakwenzeka. UGrubbs ubelokhu egqoke i-ajenda yakhe emkhonweni wakhe - elahla umlutha wezocansi, umlutha we-intanethi, Ngenkathi esho ukuthi cishe zonke izinkinga ze-porn ezivela emakhakheni enkolo (ngokungakhathali eshiya abafundi bakhe benombono wamanga wokuthi abangakholelwa ebukhoneni bukaNkulunkulu bangasebenzisa i-porn futhi bangatholi imiphumela emibi). Manje usethatha umdlalo wakhe wezokuxhumana ukuze afane nalowo wabeluleki bakhe - uPrause & Ley…. Ngokwesibonelo:

Kumelwe enze abaqeqeshi bakhe baziqhenye.

Izicelo ezingenalutho zokuthi ubhadane lwe-PIED alukho

Leli phepha lisho izikhathi eziningana ukuthi akukhona isifo se-ED, nokuthi ukusetshenziswa kocansi akuhlobene nokushaywa kwe-ED:

Naphezu kobufakazi obuphambene nalokho, amaqembu amaningi okukhuthaza nokuzimela aphikelela ekutheni lezo zithombe zobulili ezingcolile zisetshenziselwa ukushayela isifo se-erectile (ED).

Sizoqala ngamagama okuqala engcaphuno engenhla: kukhona cha “ubufakazi obuphikisayo” obukholisayo Ake sihlole lobu bufakazi obuphikisanayo.

1) Ukudumisa kanye noPfaus, 2015: Ukudumisa nokuPfaus akazange asekele izimangalo zayo. Bheka ukuhlaziywa okusemthethweni ngumcwaningi uRichard Isenberg, MD kanye nokugxila kakhulu:

Ukudumisa nokuPfaus I-2015 ayiyena isifundo kumadoda ane-ED. Kwakungeyona isifundo nhlobo. Esikhundleni salokho, u-Prause uthi uqoqe idatha kusuka ezifundweni zakhe ezine zangaphambilini, akekho okubhekiswe ekusebenziseni kwe-erectile. Kuyaphazamisa ukuthi leli phepha likaNicole Prause noJim Pfaus ladlulisa ukubuyekezwa kontanga njengoba idatha ephepheni labo ayifani nalolu daba ezinkampanini ezine ezisekelwe kulo leli phepha elithi lisekelwe. Ukungafani akuzona izikhala ezincane, kodwa izimbobo ezingenakukwazi ukuxhunyiwe. Ngaphezu kwalokho, leli phephandaba lenze izimangalo eziningana ezazingamanga noma ezingasekelwa yidatha yazo. Ngaphezu kwalokho, uNicole Prause noJim Pfaus wenza izitatimende zamanga abezindaba mayelana nendlela yabo kanye nokuthola.

2) Landripet no-Štulhofer, I-2015 ikhethwe ngokuthi "ukukhulumisana okufishane" yilo magazini eyayishicilela, futhi abalobi ababili bakhetha idatha ethile kuphela yokwabelana, ngenkathi beyeka enye idatha efanele. Njengathi Ukudumisa nokuPfaus, lo magazini wabe eshicilela i-critique ekhuluma ngobuthakathaka Landripet no-Štulhofer: I-Comment on: Ingabe Izithombe Zobulili Ezingcolile Ziyasebenzisana Nezinkinga Zezocansi kanye Nezinkinga phakathi Kwabesilisa Abashadile Abesilisa Abashadile?? nguGert Martin Hald, PhD

Ngokuqondene nesimangalo sokuthi Landripet no-Štulhofer, I-2015 ayitholanga ubuhlobo phakathi kokusetshenziswa kocansi nezinkinga zobulili, lokhu akulona iqiniso, njengoba kubhalwe kokubili le YBOP ihlaziya futhi lokhu kubuyekezwa kwezincwadi, co-authored by odokotela abaningi bamaNavy. Ngaphezu kwalokho, iphepha lika-Landripet ne-Štulhofer alikhiphi izixhumanisi ezintathu eziphawulekayo, omunye wabalobi ababethumele ngaphambilini inkomfa yaseYurophu.

Ngokubaluleke kakhulu, ekubhaliseni kwakhe, kungani uGrbs engayinaki I-27 studio ebuyekezwe ngontangaUkuxhumanisa ukusetshenziswa kocansi / ukubheja kocansi ezinkingeni zocansi nokuvuka okuncane - ikakhulukazi izifundo ze-5 lapho amadoda elapha khona izinkinga ngokuyeka izithombe zobulili ezingcolile?

Nayi ingcaphuno efanayo lapho ezama ukucindezela ekhaya iphuzu lakhe elifanayo lokukhuluma elinamaphutha ngesimo sezincwadi:

Ngokuvamile, phakathi kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile zobulili-ukusebenzisa amadoda, izinkinga ezinkulu ze-erectile kubonakala zingavamile, okuthola ukuthi kuhambisane nomlando ovelele okubonisa ukuthi ukusetshenziswa kocansi okushayela isifo se-ED.

Eqinisweni, njengoba kuphawuliwe ngenhla, amasampuli e-3 lapha ayekhona amadoda abesilisa ocansini futhi abakwa-IIEF (impilo yezocansi) izibalo zazihle kakhulu. Kulula, leli phepha amadoda angabandakanyi abantu abane-ED, awafake phakathi kwamadoda angasebenzi, futhi angafaki izintombi. Ngakho-ke, iningi lala madoda abakha "ubhubhane lwe-ED" (okuyinto labo abalobi abaphika) ashiywe kulolu cwaningo. Noma kunjalo, ngisho naku lokhu iphepha kokubili umlutha wezocansi futhi Amazinga aphakeme ekusetshenzisweni kocansi ayehlobene nokusebenza okungenasici erectile. Kungani uye ezinhlungu ezinjalo ukuphika iqiniso?

Isikhundla "somphakathi wezokwelapha"?

Abacaphuli lutho ukusekela ukuqinisekiswa kwabo, uGrubbs kanye nombhali-mbhali wakhe ngokungafanele bathi "umphakathi wezokwelapha" awutholanga ngokucacile ubufakazi bokungqubuzana kwe-ED:

Ngaphezu kwalokho, njengoba kunikezwa ukuthi umphakathi wezokwelapha awutholanga ngokugcwele ubufakazi bokukhula okwedlulele kwe-ED kumadoda amasha eminyakeni yamuva, umsebenzi wamanje unikeza ubufakazi obengeziwe ngokumelene nomqondo wokuthi ukusetshenziswa kocansi okushayayo kushayela isifo se-ED.

Iqiniso?

Ama-Historical ED amanani: Ukungasebenzi kwe-Erectile kuqala kuhlolwa ku-1940 uma i- Umbiko weKinsey waphetha ukuthi ukusabalala kwe-ED kwakungaphansi kwe-1% kumadoda amancane kuneminyaka engu-30, ngaphansi kwe-3% kulabo 30-45. Ngesikhathi ukuhlolwa kwe-ED kumadoda amancane kuncane kakhulu, lokhu ku-2002 ukuhlolwa kwe-meta-6 ephakeme ye-ED kubikile ukuthi i-5 ye-6 ibike ama-ED Amanani wamadoda angaphansi kwe-40 cishe angu-2%. I-6th Ucwaningo lubike izibalo ze-7-9%, kodwa umbuzo osetshenzisiwe awunakuqhathaniswa nezinye izifundo ze-5, futhi awuhlolisanga okungapheliyo ukungasebenzi ngendlela erectile njengabanye. Kunalokho wabuza, "Ingabe unenkinga yokulondoloza noma ukufeza ukulungiswa yisiphi isikhathi ngonyaka odlule? "

Ekupheleni kwe-2006, izingosi ze-tube zomshuwalense zamahhala zihamba phambili futhi zathola ukuthandwa okusheshayo. Lokhu ushintshe uhlobo lwe-porn ukusetshenziswa kakhulu. Ngokokuqala ngqa emlandweni, ababukeli bangakwazi ukukhula ngokukhululekile phakathi neseshini yokushaya indlwabu ngaphandle kokulinda. Kwenzekani kumazinga ED?

Izifundo eziyishumi kusukela ku-2010: Ucwaningo lweshumi olushicilelwe kusukela ku-2010 lwembula ukunyuka okukhulu kwe-erectile ukungasebenzi. Lokhu okubhalwe kulesi sihloko esilandelayo futhi kuleli phepha elibukeziwe yontanga elibhalwe yi-7 US Navy odokotela - Ingabe Izithombe Zobulili Ezingcolile Zase-Internet Zibangela Ukuhlukunyezwa Ngokocansi? Ukubuyekeza nge Imibiko Yomtholampilo (2016). Esikhathini sezinhlelo ze-10, amazinga e-erectile ukungasebenzi kahle kwamadoda ngaphansi kwe-40 avela ku-14% kuya ku-37%, kanti amazinga we-libido aphansi avela ku-16% kuya ku-37%.

Ngaphandle kokufika kwe-porn porn ukusakaza (2006) akukho ukuhlukahluka okuhlobene e-ED osemusha kuye kwashintsha ngokuphawulekayo eminyakeni yokugcina 10-20 (ukubhema amazinga aphansi, ukusetshenziswa kwezidakamizwa kuzinzile, ukukhula ngokweqile kumadoda 20-40 kuphela 4% kusukela 1999 - bheka lesi sifundo).

Ukugxuma kwamuva kwezinkinga zocansi kuyahambisana nokushicilelwa okungaphezulu Ucwaningo lwe-35 oluxhumanisa ukusetshenziswa kwezingcolile kanye "nokulutha kocansi" ezinkingeni zobulili nokuvusa okunciphisayo kwisenzo socansi. Ngaphezu kwezifundo ezibalulwe, leli khasi liqukethe izindatshana nezingxoxo ezibandakanya ochwepheshe abangaphezu kuka-150 (urology professors, urologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, sexologists, MDs) abavuma, futhi baye baphatha ngempumelelo, i-porn-kuhoxisa ED kanye nokuziphatha okubi-okubangelwa ukulahlekelwa isifiso sobulili.

Amahora amanje wokusetshenziswa kocansi kungenye yezinto eziguquguqukayo eziningi ezingase zibikezele ukuhlukunyezwa kobulili okubangelwa ucansi

Izinguquko ezengeziwe kungenzeka futhi zidingeke ziphenywe. Lokhu Ukubuyekeza kwe-2016 sigcizelele ubuthakathaka ekuxhumaniseni "amahora asetshenziselwa ukusetshenziswa" ukubikezela izidakamizwa ezithinta ucansi. Inani le-porn njengamanje elibukwayo cishe liyisinye seziguquguquki eziningi ezihlobene nokuthuthukiswa kwe-ED eyenziwe ngocansi. Abanye bangafaka:

  1. Ukulinganiswa kokushaya indlwabu ekuziphatheni okubi kobulili nokushaya indlwabu ngaphandle kwe-porn
  2. Ukulinganiswa kobulili nomuntu ngokushaya indlwabu ku-porn
  3. Izikhala phakathi kobulili obuhlukanisiwe (lapho umuntu encika kuphela ku-porn)
  4. Virgin noma cha
  5. Inani lamahora wokusetshenziswa
  6. Iminyaka yokusetshenziswa okuqhubekayo
  7. Ubudala buqala ukusebenzisa i-porn ngokuzithandela
  8. Ukunyuka kwezihlobo ezintsha
  9. Ukuthuthukiswa kwezintambo ezithinta izithombe ezingcolile zobulili ezingcolile (kusukela ekukhuphukeni kuya kohlobo olusha lwezocansi)
  10. Izinga lentando yeningi ngeseshini (okusho amavidiyo wokuhlanganisa, amathebhu amaningi)
  11. Ubuchopho obuhlobene nomlutha bushintsha noma cha
  12. Ubukhona bobulili obucansi / ukubheja kocansi (okwakuhlobene ngokuqinile nesampula # 3)
  13. Kungase kube nokuvuthwa ukubuza mayelana nokuhlelwa, umkhuba onobungozi wokushaya indlwabu kuyi-porn ngenkathi ugwema ukuphefumula.

Indlela engcono yokucwaninga ngale ndaba, ukususa ukuhlukahluka kokusebenzisa i-inthanethi futhi ubone umphumela, owenziwa ezifundweni eziningi lapho amadoda asusa ukusetshenziswa kwe-inthanethi kwe-porn futhi aphola. Ucwaningo olunjalo lubonisa ibangela esikhundleni sobumbano olususelwa ekukhunjweni okungenzeka kube nephutha - futhi luvuleleke ekutolikeni okuqhutshwa yi-ajenda njengaleso esifundweni samanje. I-YBOP ibhalwe phansi ukuzibika kwamadoda ayizinkulungwane ezimbalwa abasusa izithombe ezingcolile zobulili futhi bahlwithwa izifo ezingavamile zocansi.

Amaphutha angeziwe, futhi akhona kumaphepha angaphambili kulesi sihloko

Amanye amaphuzu alandelayo avela lokhu kuhlaziywa kwangaphambili of Ukudumisa nokuPfaus 2015. Iphepha lamanje libhekene nezinkinga eziningi ezifanayo.

  1. Awuhlolisanga abantu abakhalayo nge-erectile ukungasebenzi
  2. Awuzange acele amadoda ukuba azame ukushaya indlwabu ngaphandle kwe-porn (indlela yokuhlola i-ED eyenziwe ngocansi)
  3. Ayengenawo amadoda asusa izithombe ze-porn ukuze abone ukuthi ukusebenza kwe-erectile kugcina kuthuthuke (indlela kuphela yokukwazi ukuthi i-ED yayisungulwa yini ngocansi)
  4. Awuzange abuze mayelana neminyaka noma ukusetshenziswa kwe-porn, abantu abadala baqala ukusebenzisa i-porn, uhlobo lwe-porn, noma ukukhula kokusetshenziswa.
  5. Awuzange abuze mayelana nokuphuza ukujula noma i-anorgasmia (izandulela ku-PIED)
  6. Ukufundwa kuhlanganisa kuphela amadoda ayenomzimba ocansini (okusho ukuthi kungenzeka ukuthi awunayo i-ED egcwele), okungeke kukhishwe labo abane-ED enzima kangangokuthi bagwema ucansi
  7. Ucwaningo lwalukhipha izintombi (ezihlanganisa okuthiwa "izintombi ezingcolile" - ngubani ongakwazi ukuphatha ubulili nabalingani bangempela) ngakho-ke bonke abangazange bahlanganyele ocansini ngonyaka odlule.

Isiphetho

Ukuphenywa kwangempela kokusetshenziswa kocansi nokuhlukunyezwa ngokocansi kudinga ukubuza izihloko ukuqeda ukusebenzisa i-digital porn futhi uhlole noma yiziphi izinguquko ezinyangeni ezalandela.

Okwamanje, kusobala ukuthi umphakathi wesayense ungenza umsebenzi onembeza wokuphenya ngesimo esingesihle sezinsizwa ezisencane kakhulu ezilwa namazinga angakaze abe khona wokuhlukunyezwa ngokocansi (okuvame ukuphulukisa ngokuyeka izithombe zobulili ezingcolile zanamuhla ezikhona). Abaphenyi bangenza futhi umsebenzi obhekele kude kakhulu wokuchaza abakutholile kanye nesimo sezincwadi kunokuba badukise abafundi babo.