COMMENTS: I don’t believe dopamine is not involved, as the authors suggest. First they used a D2 antagonist. What about D1 activation which is the key to sensitization? Also, we know that sensitization involves PFC and amygdala glutamate inputs acting on the NaC. Is it simply glutamate facilitating D1 receptors? But here’s the big gap in logic: while near misses are “MORE rewarding” for gambling addicts, near misses aren’t really the reward – winning is. Dopamine drops when expectations are not met. The expectation in this case is winning.
April 13, 2016
Source:
Radboud University
Summary:
Pathological gamblers have a stronger brain reaction to so-called near-miss events: losing events that come very close to a win. Neuroscientists show this in fMRI scans of twenty-two pathological gamblers and just as many healthy controls.
Pathological gamblers have a stronger brain reaction to so-called near-miss events: losing events that come very close to a win. Neuroscientists of the Donders Institute at Radboud University show this in fMRI scans of twenty-two pathological gamblers and just as many healthy controls. The scientific journal Neuropsychopharmacology published their results in an early view article last week.
Despite being objective losses, near-misses activate a particular reward-related area in the middle of our brain: the striatum. In the current study, neuroscientist Guillaume Sescousse and his colleagues show that this activity is amplified in pathological gamblers. When compared to healthy controls, pathological gamblers show more activity in the striatum after a near-miss event, than after a complete-miss event. This activity is thought to reinforce gambling behaviour, supposedly by fostering an illusion of control on the game.
To obtain these results, Sescousse compared fMRI scans of pathological gamblers and healthy adults while they were playing a slot machine game. ‘We’ve made our gambling game as lifelike as possible by improving the visuals, adding more sounds and adapting the speed of the slot wheel compared to previous versions. In our game, the chance for a near-miss was 33%, compared to 17% for a win and 50% for a complete-miss.’
Intensive study
Gamblers have a strong illusion of control and they believe in luck more than others when they gamble. ‘It was challenging to find the subjects for this experiment’, according to Sescousse. ‘The prevalence of pathological gambling is relatively low in the Netherlands, and our study was rather intensive. People had to come back to the Donders Institute three times, and they could not have any additional disorders, diseases or drug prescriptions.’
What is happening in the mind of a gambler when confronted with a near-miss event? Sescousse: ‘In normal situations near-miss events signal the fact that you are learning: this time you didn’t get it quite yet, but keep practicing and you will. Near-misses thus reinforce your behaviour, which happens by triggering activity in reward-related brain regions like the striatum. This also happens when gambling. But slot machines are random, in contrast to everyday life, which makes them such a great challenge to our brain. That’s why these near-misses may create an illusion of control.’
Surprise
Animal studies have shown that behavioral responses to near‐miss events are modulated by dopamine, but this dopaminergic influence had not yet been tested in humans. Therefore, all subjects performed the experiment twice: one time after receiving a dopamine blocker, and one time after receiving a placebo. Surprisingly, brain responses to near-miss events were not influenced by this manipulation. ‘For me, this is another confirmation of the complexity of the puzzle that we are working on’, Sescousse explains.
Story Source:
The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Radboud University. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.
Journal Reference:
- Guillaume Sescousse, Lieneke K Janssen, Mahur M Hashemi, Monique HM Timmer, Dirk EM Geurts, Niels P ter Huurne, Luke Clark, Roshan Cools. Amplified Striatal Responses to Near-Miss Outcomes in Pathological Gamblers. Neuropsychopharmacology, 2016; DOI: 10.1038/npp.2016.43
;
