Attitudes and Risk Factors of Pornography Consumption Among Bangladeshi University Students: An Exploratory Study (2018)

Al Mamun, M. A., SM Yasir Arafat, Mst Ambiatunnahar, and Mark D. Griffiths.

International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction: 1-13.

Abstract

Pornography is extensively produced, distributed, and used as a medium of entertainment around the world but has been little studied in Bangladesh. The present study examined the attitudes and risk factors of Bangladeshi university students’ pornography consumption. A survey was carried among 313 undergraduate students at Jahangirnagar University (Dhaka, Bangladesh). The study found that 72% of students consumed pornography at least once within their entire life, and approximately half of them were occasional consumers. Approximately two-thirds (67%) encountered pornography during high school, although females typically encountered pornography much later. Logistic regression analysis showed that pornography consumption was predicted by being male, living in a rural area, being in a relationship, engaging in online activities (such as using Facebook), and watching movies. Further research is needed to further determine the behavioral patterns and associated factors that influence pornography consumption among Bangladeshi students.

Keywords

Pornography Pornography consumption Pornography attitudes Student sexual behavior Bangladeshi sex 

Pornography is extensively produced and distributed, and used as a medium of entertainment around the world. The term “pornography” has been referred to as fictional drama in printed or visual form depicting explicit sexual body parts and/or sexual activity which some individuals may find offensive, rude, and immoral, and that is primarily intended to sexually arouse the target audience and is intended to entertain or arouse erotic desire (Flood 2007; Malamuth 2001; Mosher 1988). Similarly, Morgan (2011) defined consuming pornography as intentionally looking at pictures, videos, written, and/or audio material depicting naked people portrayed sexually, and/or people engaging in sex or masturbation.

The issue of exposure to pornography (i.e., pornography consumption) has received a great deal of consideration. Studies have consistently shown that males are more likely to actively seek out and view sexually explicit materials than females (Bleakley et al. 2011; Brown and L’Engle 2009; Lim et al. 2017; Peter and Valkenburg 2006; Regnerus et al. 2016; Rissel et al. 2017; Shek and Ma 2016). It has been claimed that men are regular pornography consumers due to factors such as their common behavioral aptitudes and impulsivity (Chowdhury et al. 2018). Pornography consumption has also increased as a result of the internet because it has made pornography more accessible, affordable, and anonymous (Cooper 1998; Owens et al. 2012). The increased use of mobile devices (e.g., smartphones, tablets, etc.) has also led to new ways of interacting with friends (e.g., using Facebook) and engaging in other behaviors such as listening to music (via smartphones, MP3 players) and watching streamed movies and television boxsets (e.g., Netflix). The use of these new mobile devices and new ways of engaging in leisure activities may also be factors in the increased consumption of pornography. Other pornography consumption-related factors include when pornography was first encountered (i.e., childhood, adolescence, adulthood), where individuals live (e.g., urban or rural areas), peer influence, and type of preferred pornography (e.g., videos, photographs, sexual stories) (Braithwaite et al. 2015; Carroll et al. 2008; Chowdhury et al. 2018; Sørensen and Kjørholt 2007).

The reasons and factors involved in viewing pornography are multi-faceted and include wanting to be sexually aroused and/or for masturbatory purposes, for curiosity, for information and educational purposes, for improving mood, and for satisfying sexual fantasies etc. (Boies 2002; Mattebo et al. 2014; Merrick et al. 2013; Paul and Shim 2008). Accessing pornography can also shape attitudes towards it and can affect individuals’ daily lives and associated activities (e.g., Patterson and Price 2012; Perry 2015, 2016, 2017). It has also been claimed that pornography can negatively affect community morals (Lo and Wei 2005; Mattebo et al. 2014), cause disruption to individuals’ sex lives such as the frequency of sexual activity, inhibition of sexual performance, and relationship breakdown (Flood 2009; Hald and Malamuth 2008; Maddox et al. 2011; Paul and Shim 2008; Poulsen et al. 2013).

In Bangladesh (where the present study was carried out), the country has poor health literacy and sexuality is a covert issue due to its socio-cultural and religious environment (Ahsan et al. 2016; Arafat 2017; Arafat et al. 2018). Sexuality is not a topic that is discussed in public, and knowledge is poor, reinforced by traditional healers who contribute to disseminating sexual misconception among the population (Ahsan et al. 2016; Arafat 2017). To date, there has been a dearth of research in Bangladesh concerning sexual behavior, attitudes towards sex, and quality of sexual life. A recent Bangladeshi study by Chowdhury et al. (2018) reported that the prevalence rate for having accessed online pornography among those aged 20 to 25 years was 54% in males and 12.5% in females. Given the lack of research in Bangladesh, the present exploratory study examined undergraduate students’ pornography consumption and their perceptions and attitudes towards pornography consumption. Risk factors for pornography consumption were explored including gender, residence area, relationship status, leisure activities, and engagement in online activities.

Methods

Participants and Procedure

A short offline (“pen-and-paper”) survey was conducted among the first-year students at Jahangirnagar University (Dhaka, Bangladesh) between January and May 2018. A total of 500 students were approached in the university halls (i.e., their living accommodation) and completed surveys were collected from 313 students (62.6% response rate). The survey comprised three sections: (i) socio-demographic information, (ii) perceptions towards pornography, and (iii) attitudes towards pornography. The survey comprised closed questions and took approximately 15 minutes to complete.

Materials

The survey was formulated based on the findings of previous research (e.g., Braithwaite et al. 2015; Brown and L’Engle 2009; Carroll et al. 2008; Chowdhury et al. 2018; Sørensen and Kjørholt 2007). The questions were devised by the research team and were kept as simple as possible based on the observations from pretesting. Questions also included “Who first introduced you to pornography?”, “What type of pornography do you enjoy?”, “Why do you use pornography?”, “How do you feel after pornography use?”, and “What steps (if any) should be taken to abstain in pornography use?” Based on previous literature, it was hypothesized that several factors may contribute to pornography consumption including gender, residence area, relationship status, preferred leisure activities, and engagement in online activities. The survey also included perceptional questions (statements on the basis of whether pornography was viewed as “good” and “bad”) as a means to address the participants’ relationship with sexually explicit materials.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0 and Microsoft Excel 2016. Descriptive statistics and first-order analysis were performed (e.g., frequencies, percentages, means, and chi-square tests) with SPSS 22.0. All variables found significant in bivariate analysis were then entered into a binary logistic regression model with pornography consumption as the dependent variable. The results of logistic regression are reported as unadjusted with 95% confidence intervals.

Ethics

The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the research team’s university’s Department of Public Health and Informatics. Data were collected anonymously and informed written consent was taken from the participants before data collection commenced. All participants were informed about the (i) nature and purpose of the study, (ii) procedure of study, (iii) right to refuse, and (iv) right to withdraw from participating in the study. The participants did not gain any financial benefit from taking part in the study. Confidentiality of data and anonymity to the participants was ensured.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 19.68 years (± 0.94) ranging from 18 to 23 years, comprising 69% males, with 57.8% of participants currently in no close romantic relationship (see Table 1 for overview of socio-demographic information). In relation to the statement of why “pornography is bad” (Table 2), participants described it as offensive and degrading (62%), that it violated religious principles (62%), and that it promoted masturbation (57.5%). In relation to why “pornography is good” (Table 2), participants described it as something that could be used for sexual control to masturbate rather than having sexual intercourse (31%), can lead to more open attitudes about sexuality (19.5%), and offers a harmless outlet for unconventional or other private fantasies (19%). Results also showed that 72% of participants had consumed pornography at least once in their entire life (Table 3). Peer influence was the most reported cause of pornography consumption (34.5%), and 67% of participants described their initial encountering of pornography at high school level. Approximately half of the participants masturbated during or after watching the pornography (51%), and the most preferred type of pornography was watching videos (Table 3). Self-rated pornography consumption was strongly associated with gender (p < 0.001) with males engaging in pornography 12 times more than females (Table 4).

Table 1

Distribution of socio-demographic variables of the respondents

Variables

Number

Percent

Gender

 Male

216

69.0

 Female

97

31

Come form (residential area)

 Rural area

163

52.1

 Urban area

150

47.9

Relationship status

 No relationship

181

57.8

 In a relationship

110

35.1

Hobbya

 Using Facebook

168

14.7%

 Listening music

184

16.1%

 Watching movie

168

14.7%

 Engaging relationship

63

5.5%

 Gossiping

160

14.0%

 Reading book

134

11.8%

 Traveling

160

14.0%

 Being alone

103

9.0%

Relationship with friends

 Very good

104

33.2

 Good

117

37.4

 Fair

77

24.6

 Bad

11

3.5

aMultiple response possible

Table 2

Perceptions concerning pornography consumption and gender differences

Variables

Gender

p value

Male (%)

Female (%)

Total (%)

Perception of pornography as bada

 Can be offensive and degrading

134 (62.0%)

61 (62.9%)

195 (62.3%)

0.886

 Can undermine sexual relationships

111 (51.4%)

29 (29.9%)

140 (44.7%)

0.001

 Can influence s the committing sexual crimes, including rape

100 (46.3%)

46 (47.4%)

146 (46.6%)

0.853

 Can cause a breakdown of community morals

111 (51.4%)

45 (46.4%)

156 (49.8%)

0.414

 Can violate religious principles

146 (67.6%)

49 (50.5%)

195 (62.3%)

0.004

 Can lead from bad to worse (e.g., sex addiction)

83 (38.4%)

43 (44.3%)

126 (40.3%)

0.325

 Can give rise to negative attitudes to the opposite sex

99 (45.8%)

32 (33.0%)

131 (41.9%)

0.033

 Can promote masturbation

152 (70.4%)

28 (28.9%)

180 (57.5%)

0.01

Perception of pornography as gooda

 Can learn about sexual education

36 (16.7%)

11 (11.3%)

47 (15.0%)

0.222

 Can control behavior though masturbation instead of sexual intercourse

82 (38.0%)

13 (14.4%)

96 (30.7%)

0.000

 Can improve sexual relationships

18 (8.3%)

8 (9.3%)

27 (8.6%)

0.783

 Can lead to more open attitudes about sexuality

48 (22.2%)

12 (13.4%)

61 (19.5%)

0.068

 Can offer a harmless outlet for unconventional or other private fantasies

50 (23.1%)

8 (9.3%)

59 (18.8%)

0.004

 Can be a socially beneficial form of artistic self-expression

40 (18.5%)

8 (9.3%)

49 (15.7%)

0.037

aMultiple response possible

Table 3

Pornography consumption of participants and gender differences

Variables

Gender

p value

Male (%)

Female (%)

Total (%)

Encountering pornography

 Never

27 (12.6%)

60 (64.5%)

87 (28.2)

0.001

 Yes

188 (87.4%)

33 (35.5%)

221 (71.8)

First introduced by

 Close friend

84 (38.8%)

24 (24.8%)

108 (34.5%)

0.025

 Oneself

88 (40.8%)

11 (11.4%)

99 (31.6%)

0.000

 Found accidentally on the internet

36 (16.7%)

10 (10.3%)

46 (14.7%)

0.142

 Other

34 (16.0%)

8 (8.5%)

42 (13.7%)

0.080

First encountering of pornography

 Primary school (6–12 years old)

24 (12.8%)

6 (14%)

30 (13.1%)

0.001

 High school (13–17 years old)

137 (72.8%)

18 (43.9%)

155 (66.6%)

 University (18 to more years old)

27 (14.3%)

17 (41.5%)

44 (19.2%)

Pornography consumption

 One or two times in ever

89 (42.2%)

21 (9.7%)

110 (50.9%)

0.001

 Once a week

43 (19.9%)

7 (3.2%)

50 (23.1%)

 A few times a week

39 (18.1%)

2 (0.9%)

41 (19.0%)

 Once a day

6 (2.8%)

2 (0.9%)

8 (3.7%)

 Several times a day

6 (2.8%)

1 (.0.5%)

7 (3.2%)

Frequency of exposure to pornography (last 15 days)

 I did not use porn in the last 15 days

66 (35.1%)

21 (51.2%)

87 (38.0%)

0.008

 Less than 1 h

68 (36.2%)

7 (17.1%)

75 (32.8%)

 2–5 h

35 (18.6%)

3 (7.3%)

38 (16.6%)

 6–15 h

13 (6.9%)

6 (14.6%)

19 (8.3%)

 More than 16 h

6 (3.2%)

4 (9.7%)

10 (1.7%)

Type of pornography engaged in

 Looking a nude photographs

50 (23.7%)

9 (9.3%)

59 (19.2%)

0.003

 Looking at a sexual magazine

65 (30.8%)

10 (10.3%)

75 (24.4%)

0.001

 Watching a nude video

113 (53.6%)

13 (13.4%)

126 (40.9%)

0.001

 Fantasizing about someone sexually

70 (32.5%)

10 (10.3%)

80 (25.5%)

0.025

 Engaging in phone or chat sex

27 (12.6%)

5 (5.2%)

32 (10.3%)

0.046

Reasons for pornography consumption

 Out of curiosity

80 (37.0%)

28 (28.9%)

108 (34.5%)

0.160

 To entertain myself

82 (38.0%)

6 (6.2%)

88 (28.1%)

0.001

 To masturbate

98 (45.4%)

9 (9.3%)

107 (34.1%)

0.001

 To engage in sexual fantasy

84 (38.9%)

8 (8.3%)

92 (29.4%)

0.002

 To improve my mood

24 (11.1%)

8 (8.2%)

32 (10.2%)

0.439

 To educate myself

22 (10.2%)

7 (7.2%)

29 (9.3%)

0.402

Reactions to consuming pornography

 No problem—I am fine with my porn use

63 (29.2%)

12 (12.4%)

75 (24.0%)

0.001

 I masturbate

144 (66.6%)

16 (16.5%)

160 (51.1%)

0.001

 I feel sinful while using pornography

53 (24.5%)

9 (9.3%)

62 (19.8%)

0.002

 Other

35 (16.2%)

12 (12.4%)

47 (15.0%)

0.380

Abstaining from pornography

 Yes

144 (73.8%)

35 (79.5%)

179 (74.9%)

0.431

 No

51 (26.2%)

9 (20.5%)

60 (25.1%)

Step that can be taken to abstain from pornography

 Following religious discipline

132 (61.1%)

26 (26.8%)

158 (50.5%)

0.001

 Gossiping with friends

95 (44.0%)

14 (14.4%)

109 (34.8%)

0.001

 Engaging in study/work

100 (46.3%)

23 (23.7%)

123 (39.3%)

0.001

 Pornographic sites should be offed

72 (33.3%)

14 (14.4%)

86 (27.5%)

0.001

 Engaging in favorite tasks

98 (45.4%)

25 (25.8%)

123 (39.3%)

0.001

Table 4

Logistic regression analysis of factor associates with pornography consumption

Variables

Pornography consumption

Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

p value

Demographic factors

 Gender

  Male

12.66 (7.05–22.74)

0.001

  Female

1.00

 Come from (residential area)

  Urban

0.52 (0.31–0.86)

0.010

  Rural

1.00

 Relationship with boyfriend/girlfriend

  Have no relationship

0.53 (0.30–0.94)

0.029

  Have a relationship

1.00

Hobby

 Using Facebook

  Yes

2.062 (1.246–3.413)

0.005

  No

1.00

 Listening to music

  Yes

1.118 (0.676–1.850)

0.663

  No

1.00

 Watching movies

  Yes

2.122 (1.280–3.518)

0.004

  No

1.00

 Engaging in a relationship

  Yes

1.664 (0.853–3.247)

0.135

  No

1.00

 Gossiping with friends

  Yes

1.371 (0.833–2.255)

0.214

  No

1.00

 Reading books

  Yes

0.606 (0.368–0.999)

0.049

  No

1.00

 Traveling

  Yes

1.504 (0.913–2.479)

0.109

  No

1.00

 Being alone

  Yes

0.526 (0.314–0.879)

0.014

  No

1.00

Perception regarding pornography use as bad

 Offensive and degrading

  Yes

0.858 (0.511–1.442)

0.564

  No

1.00

 Undermines sexual relationships

  Yes

3.019 (1.751–5.205)

0.001

  No

1.00

 Influences the committing of sexual crimes, including rape

  Yes

0.935 (0.569–1.537)

0.792

  No

1.00

 Breakdowns of community morals

  Yes

0.951 (0.579–1.562)

0.843

  No

1.00

 Violates religious principles

  Yes

1.330 (0.802–2.207)

0.269

  No

1.00

 Leads from bad to worse (e.g., sex addiction)

  Yes

1.091 (0.657–1.812)

0.736

  No

1.00

 Raises negative attitudes to opposite sex

  Yes

1.570 (0.938–2.629)

0.086

  No

1.00

 Promotes masturbation

  Yes

4.895 (2.864–8.366)

0.001

  No

1.00

Perception regarding pornography use as good

 People can learn sexual education

  Yes

1.548 (0.733–3.270)

0.252

  No

1.00

 Can control behavior though masturbation instead of sexual intercourse

  Yes

4.318 (2.170–8.591)

0.001

  No

1.00

 Can improve sexual relationship

  Yes

1.417 (0.552–3.841)

0.468

  No

1.00

 Can lead to more open attitudes about sexuality

  Yes

2.310 (1.114–4.790)

0.024

  No

1.00

 Offers a harmless outlet for unconventional or other private fantasies

  Yes

2.962 (1.342–6.538)

0.007

  No

1.00

 Socially beneficial form of artistic self-expression

  Yes

4.077 (1.559–10.662)

0.004

  No

1.00

Similarly, results from the regression analysis showed that being male was a predictor of pornography consumption (OR = 12.66; 95% CI: 7.05–22.74). Students from rural areas (OR = 1.93; 95% CI: 1.17–3.20) and those engaged in relationships (OR = 1.87; 95% CI 1.07–3.29) were also identified as predictors of pornography consumption. Among hobbies, using Facebook (OR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.25–3.41) and watching movies (OR = 2.122; 95% CI 1.28–3.52) were the strongest predictors of pornography consumption. In relation to negative perceptions of pornography, pornography consumption was predicted by perceiving pornography as (i) promoting masturbation (OR = 4.86; 95% CI 2.86–8.37), (ii) undermining sexual relationships (OR = 3.02; 95% CI 1.75–5.20), and (iii) having negative attitudes towards the opposite sex (OR = 1.57; 95% CI 0.94–2.63). In relation to positive perceptions of pornography, pornography consumption was predicted by perceiving pornography as (i) controlling behavior via masturbation instead of sexual intercourse (OR = 4.32; 95% CI 2.17–8.59), (ii) being a socially beneficial form of artistic self-expression (OR = 4.077; 95% CI 1.56–10.66), (iii) offering a harmless outlet for unconventional or other private fantasies (OR = 2.96; 95% CI 1.34–6.54), and (iv) leading to more open attitudes about sexuality (OR = 2.31;95% CI 1.11–4.79).

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to assess consumption and attitudes towards pornography and their associated factors among Bangladesh undergraduate university students. Results showed that nearly three-quarters of students consumed pornography at least once in their lifetime (72%). The overall pornography consumption rate was therefore less than reported in studies from India (80%; Das 2013), Sweden (98%; Donevan and Mattebo 2017), and Australia (87%; Lim et al. 2017), but greater than the one previous study in Bangladesh (42%; Chowdhury et al. 2018). These differing results are most likely due to different methods, criteria, and sample studied. For instance, the present study recruited undergraduate university students whereas other studies used different populations. The sample in the present study is also more likely to have had more (i) accessible, affordable internet services compared to the previous study in Bangladesh and (ii) familiarity and expertise with accessing the internet compared to those in more rural populations.

Because internet technology has become more accessible, affordable, and anonymous, (Griffiths 2000; Owens et al. 2012), it has facilitated individuals accessing online material of a sexual nature including online pornographic videos, online sexual chatting, etc. (Boies 2002; Goodson et al. 2001; Griffiths 2001; 2012; Shaughnessy et al. 2011; Short et al. 2012). Regression analysis in the present study showed that pornography consumption was significantly associated with a number of activities including having online hobbies (e.g., using Facebook) and watching movies. Given that watching movies online was the most preferred form of pornography in the present study, the finding makes intuitive sense.

From the regression analysis, results demonstrated that the students originally from rural areas in Bangladesh were more likely to consume pornography from those in urban areas, which is the reverse from the result of the previous study on pornographic consumption in Bangladesh (Chowdhury et al. 2018). Pornography consumption was also predicted by being in a relationship, a finding that has not been reported before to the authors’ knowledge. Research is needed to further address these demographic factors to establish this and other risk factors of pornography consumption. Predictably, more male students consumed sexually explicit materials than females, and analysis demonstrated that males were 12 times more likely to engage in pornography consumption than females similar to results from previous studies in the USA (Bleakley et al. 2011; Brown and L’Engle 2009; Regnerus et al. 2016), Netherlands (Peter and Valkenburg 2006), Hong Kong (Shek and Ma 2012, 2016), Taiwan (Lo et al. 1999), Sweden (Häggström-Nordin et al. 2006), and Australia (Lim et al. 2017; Rissel et al. 2017). Men are active consumers of pornography due to common behavioral aptitudes (Chowdhury et al. 2018), but the results of the present study indicate that some women are occasional users of pornography as has been noted elsewhere (Carroll et al. 2008). Interestingly, although female pornography consumption was much lower than males, among those that had accessed pornography, females viewed more of it than males in terms of number of hours in the past 15 days. This is a novel finding not reported previously in the literature and may be because the time needed to reach optimum sexual arousal (i.e., ejaculation/orgasm) is typically shorter among men than women (Huey et al. 1981).

The rate of pornography consumption once per week (23%) was greater than Braithwaite et al.’s (2015) two studies (10% in the first study and 14% in the second study) but less than Carroll et al.’s study (27% in males, 2% in females) and about the same as Sørensen and Kjørholt’s study (22%). Engaging in pornography consumption a few times a week (19%) was greater than Carroll et al.’s (2008) study (16% in males, 0.8% in females), but less than Sorensen and Kjørholt’s study (22%). Engaging in pornography consumption once (3.7%) or several times a day (3.2%) was less than Carroll et al.’s (2008) study (16% once a day; 5.2% several times in a day) but marginally greater than Braithwaite et al.’s (2015) studies (once a day (2%), several times a day (2%) in the first study; once a day (2%), several times a day (3%) in the second study). Having a close friend engaged in pornography consumption was more likely to influence an individual’s pornography consumption than them seeking it out on their own. Furthermore, although the internet now plays a key role in consuming pornography (Boies 2002; Cooper 1998; Goodson et al. 2001; Griffiths 2012; Shaughnessy et al. 2011; Short et al. 2012), the participants in the present study were more likely to consume it via other means than the internet.

Adolescence is the most vulnerable period to encounter pornography (Bleakley et al. 2011; Donevan and Mattebo 2017; Hald and Malamuth 2008; L’Engle et al. 2006; Mattebo et al. 2014; Peter and Valkenburg 2006; Sørensen and Kjørholt 2007); therefore, it was unsurprising that a large proportion of participants in the present study (i.e., 67%) were exposed to pornography at high school level (13–17 years old). However, females were equally as likely to first encounter pornography at university as they were at high school. The types of sexually explicit materials was found in various formats both online and offline including magazines and videos and concurs with previous research (Morgan 2011) although Bangladeshi students appear to access pornography less on the internet than in other countries (Griffiths 2012). The most preferred form of pornography by participants in the present study was watching pornographic videos (41%) which is greater than one study conducted in USA (male 36%; female 24%) (Brown and L’Engle 2009), but fantasizing about someone sexually was also considered by 25.5% of participants to be a pornographic activity. Whether this is really a form of pornography is highly debatable and further research is needed on other populations to determine if such thinking is widespread. Some of these findings may perhaps be explained by participants living in a Muslim country although the religion of participants (and whether they proactively lived by Muslim codes of practice) was not investigated. The results suggest that despite religious and moral values being highly prevalent in Bangladesh, such values do not prevent pornography consumption. This may have implications for how sex education is taught in high school and that education about pornography should be a topic that is discussed rather than ignored in such education.

This present study found that approximately half of participants reported masturbating while consuming pornography, which is less than a previous Canadian study (40%) (Boies 2002). As with the findings of other studies, the present study found that the common reasons for consuming pornography were for physical release and masturbation, curiosity, sexual learning, and satisfying fantasies (e.g., Boies 2002; Merrick et al. 2013; Paul and Shim 2008). These “good” reasons for pornography were unsurprisingly predictors of pornography consumption in the regression analysis. In Muslim countries like Bangladesh, sexuality and pornography are arguably viewed as sensitive and hidden taboo topics (Ahsan et al. 2016). The participants in the present studies may be religiously and culturally sophisticated and whose religious beliefs, commitments, and morals may have influenced their reasons as to why pornography is “bad,” such as it being offensive and degrading, violating religious principles, and conflicting with their personal values (Patterson and Price 2012). The values relating to sexual desire and behavior in Bangladesh is that they should be carried out within monogamous, married, and heterosexual relationships (Perry 2017). Further research is needed on the conflict between what the culture and religion of a country expects from a sexual perspective and what happens in actuality.

The influence of excessive pornography consumption can be in opposition to the nation’s individual health which includes physical health, sexual health, and mental health (Flood 2009; Weaver III et al. 2011), and the implications of this means that sexual literacy in such countries needs to be more pragmatic and less moralizing particularly among adolescents and emerging adults. However, it should also be noted that some studies claim that pornography can decrease the quality of life and facilitate negative attitudes concerning friendliness and respect towards the opposite gender (Hald and Malamuth 2008; Paul and Shim 2008), impact negatively on relationships (Maddox et al. 2011), and lead to marriage break-ups (Paul and Shim 2008). Some participants in the present study clearly had no interest in pornography whatsoever, and this may have been due to what the participant felt were potential negative effects on their own relationships. This was far more prevalent among female participants in the present study. Participants provided many recommendations as to how to abstain from pornography consumption including following religious discipline, engaging with work and/or study, and gossiping with friends. The implications of this finding suggests that in Bangladesh (at least), such factors could be included as potential discussion topics in sexual health programs in high schools and universities.

Limitations

The present study is now without its limitations. The present study was cross-sectional in design and therefore cannot provide an indication of causality. In order to remedy this, longitudinal investigations of pornography consumption are needed to assess causal relations between the assessed variables. The sample size was also modest, and the data were self-report (and open to well-known biases such as memory recall and social desirability). The response rate (62.6%) while arguably good still meant that approximately one-third of those individuals approached did not participate. Reasons for non-participation are unknown but this could have affected the results. Future research should therefore comprise larger samples and try to increase participation rates. Furthermore, the present study was conducted at the only university near the capital of Bangladesh and therefore generalizability to other university student samples (and other types of populations) in the country (and other countries) may be limited. Consequently, future research should use more representative samples in both Bangladesh and other countries.

Conclusions

The present study provided novel findings indicating that perceptions and attitudes towards pornography consumption can be conflicting in a highly religious culture and warrants further study. The study’s findings add to the existing evidence regarding the association between demographic factors, perceptions, and attitudes in predicting pornography consumption. It also provides data from a country that has rarely studied the topic of pornography and its consumption. Results demonstrated that a large proportion of Bangladeshi students consume pornography even though there is much emphasis upon sex only being monogamous and within a heterosexual marriage. Socio-demographic factors (such as coming from a rural area) were associated with pornography consumption in the present study and may be a factor unique to Bangladesh and/or similar religious cultures. Moreover, the perceptions regarding pornography being both good and bad do little to clarify individuals’ real attitudes towards pornography consumption. Many of the bad things said regarding pornography were likely stated from a religious, moral, and cultural (socially desirable) perspective whereas the good things may have been stated from a personal and/or pragmatic perspective. The role of both gender and religion (including its beliefs and morals) in relation to pornography consumption require further study in Bangladesh and other countries.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the trainee team of Undergraduate Research Organization most considerably Abu Bakkar Siddique, Shahzabein Ritu, and Ahsanul Mahbub Jubayar; and Sahadat Hossain & Fatema Rahaman Mishu, Department of Public Health & Informatics, Jahangirnagar University, for the necessary support during data collection and input.

Funding

Self-funded.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethics

The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the research team’s university’s Department of Public Health and Informatics.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahsan, M. S., Arafat, S. M. Y., Ali, R., Rahman, S. M. A., Ahmed, S., & Rahman, M. M. (2016). Sexual history taking competency: A survey among the clinicians in Bangladesh. International Journal of Psychiatry, 1(1), 4.Google Scholar
  2. Arafat, S. M. Y. (2017). Dhat syndrome: culture bound, separate entity, or removed. Journal of Behavioral Health, 6(3), 147–150.Google Scholar
  3. Arafat, S. M. Y., Majumder, M. A. A., Kabir, R., Papadopoulos, K., & Uddin, M. S. (2018). Health literacy in school. In Optimizing health literacy for improved clinical practices (pp. 175–197). Hershey: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleakley, A., Hennessy, M., & Fishbein, M. (2011). A model of adolescents’ seeking of sexual content in their media choices. Journal of Sex Research, 48, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boies, S. C. (2002). University students’ uses of and reactions to online sexual information and entertainment: Links to online and offline sexual behaviour. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11(2), 77–89.Google Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, S. R., Coulson, G., Keddington, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2015). The influence of pornography on sexual scripts and hooking up among emerging adults in college. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, J. D., & L’Engle, K. L. (2009). X-rated: Sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with US early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36(1), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, J. S., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Nelson, L. J., Olson, C. D., McNamara Barry, C., & Madsen, S. D. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23(1), 6–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chowdhury, M. R. H. K., Chowdhury, M. R. K., Kabir, R., Perera, N. K. P., & Kader, M. (2018). Does the addiction in online pornography affect the behavioral pattern of undergrad private university students in Bangladesh? International Journal of Health Sciences, 12(3), 67–74.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the internet: Surfing into the new millennium. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 1(2), 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das, A. M. (2013). More than 80 percent of high school students exposed to porn, says study. Indian Express, July 30. Retrieved from: http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2013/jul/30/More-than-80-percent-of-high-school-students-exposed-to-porn-says-study-501873.html. Accessed 29 Sept 2018.
  12. Donevan, M., & Mattebo, M. (2017). The relationship between frequent pornography consumption, behaviours, and sexual preoccupancy among male adolescents in Sweden. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 12, 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flood, M. (2007). Exposure to pornography among youth in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 43(1), 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Flood, M. (2009). The harms of pornography exposure among children and young people. Child Abuse Review, 18(6), 384–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodson, P., McCormick, D., & Evans, A. (2001). Searching for sexually explicit materials on the Internet: An exploratory study of college students’ behavior and attitudes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30(2), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffiths, M. D. (2000). Excessive internet use: Implications for sexual behavior. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 3, 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths, M. D. (2001). Sex on the internet: Observations and implications for sex addiction. Journal of Sex Research, 38, 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffiths, M. D. (2012). Internet sex addiction: A review of empirical research. Addiction Research & Theory, 20(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Häggström-Nordin, E., Sandberg, J., Hanson, U., & Tydén, T. (2006). It’s everywhere!’ Young Swedish people’s thoughts and reflections about pornography. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 20(4), 386–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hald, G. M., & Malamuth, N. M. (2008). Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(4), 614–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huey, C. J., Kline-Graber, G., & Graber, B. (1981). Time factors and orgasmic response. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10(2), 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. L’Engle, K. L., Brown, J. D., & Kenneavy, K. (2006). The mass media are an important context for adolescents’ sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38(3), 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim, M. S. C., Agius, P. A., Carrotte, E. R., Vella, A. M., & Hellard, M. E. (2017). Young Australians’ use of pornography and associations with sexual risk behaviours. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 41(4), 438–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lo, V.-H., & Wei, R. (2005). Exposure to Internet pornography and Taiwanese adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(2), 221–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lo, V., Neilan, E., Sun, M., & Chiang, S. (1999). Exposure of Taiwanese adolescents to pornographic media and its impact on sexual attitudes and behaviour. Asian Journal of Communication, 9(1), 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maddox, A. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2011). Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: associations with relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malamuth, N. M. (2001). Pornography. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 17, pp. 11816–11821). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mattebo, M., Larsson, M., Tydén, T., & Häggström-Nordin, E. (2014). Professionals’ perceptions of the effect of pornography on Swedish adolescents. Public Health Nursing, 31(3), 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merrick, J., Tenenbaum, A., & Omar, H. A. (2013). Human sexuality and adolescence. Frontiers in Public Health, 1, 41.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Morgan, E. M. (2011). Associations between young adults’ use of sexually explicit materials and their sexual preferences, behaviors, and satisfaction. Journal of Sex Research, 48(6), 520–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mosher, D. L. (1988). Pornography defined: sexual involvement theory, narrative context, and goodness-of-fit. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 1(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Owens, E. W., Behun, R. J., Manning, J. C., & Reid, R. C. (2012). The impact of internet pornography on adolescents: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 19(1–2), 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patterson, R., & Price, J. (2012). Pornography, religion, and the happiness gap: Does pornography impact the actively religious differently? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 51(1), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paul, B., & Shim, J. W. (2008). Gender, sexual affect, and motivations for Internet pornography use. International Journal of Sexual Health, 20(3), 187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perry, S. L. (2015). Pornography consumption as a threat to religious socialization. Sociology of Religion, 76(4), 436–458.Google Scholar
  36. Perry, S. L. (2016). From bad to worse? Pornography consumption, spousal religiosity, gender, and marital quality. Sociological Forum, 31, 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perry, S. L. (2017). Spousal religiosity, religious bonding, and pornography consumption. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 561–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material on the Internet. Communication Research, 33(2), 178–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poulsen, F. O., Busby, D. M., & Galovan, A. M. (2013). Pornography use: Who uses it and how it is associated with couple outcomes. Journal of Sex Research, 50(1), 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Regnerus, M., Gordon, D., & Price, J. (2016). Documenting pornography use in America: A comparative analysis of methodological approaches. Journal of Sex Research, 53(7), 873–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rissel, C., Richters, J., de Visser, R. O., McKee, A., Yeung, A., & Caruana, T. (2017). A profile of pornography users in Australia: Findings from the second Australian study of health and relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 54(2), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaughnessy, K., Byers, E. S., & Walsh, L. (2011). Online sexual activity experience of heterosexual students: Gender similarities and differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(2), 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, C. M. S. (2012). Consumption of pornographic materials among early adolescents in Hong Kong: Profiles and psychosocial correlates. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 11(2), 143–150.Google Scholar
  44. Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, C. M. S. (2016). A six-year longitudinal study of consumption of pornographic materials in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 29(1), S12–S21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Short, M. B., Black, L., Smith, A. H., Wetterneck, C. T., & Wells, D. E. (2012). A review of Internet pornography use research: Methodology and content from the past 10 years. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(1), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sørensen, A. D., & Kjørholt, V. S. (2007). How do Nordic adolescents relate to pornography? A quantitative study. In: Generation P? Youth, gender and pornography (pp. 87–102). Copenhagen: Danish School of Educational Press.Google Scholar
  47. Weaver III, J. B., Weaver, S. S., Mays, D., Hopkins, G. L., Kannenberg, W., & McBride, D. (2011). Mental-and physical-health indicators and sexually explicit media use behavior by adults. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(3), 764–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar