What is Sexualization? Understanding the Phenomenon From a Historical Perspective
Concerns about media portrayals that sexually objectify women are not new and have been a prominent critique within analyses of gender and the media since the 1970s (e.g., Busby, 1975). Within this work, sexual objectification has been defined in a number of ways. According to one definition,
This approach toward media’s sexual objectification changed in the late 1990s when new theories and new measures were introduced. Drawing on existing psychological and feminist theories, two different research teams sought to characterize and address how developing within a sexually objectifying culture may affect girls and women. One team was Nita McKinley and Janet Hyde. In 1996 they published an article that developed and validated a scale to assess objectified body consciousness (OBC), which referred to women’s experience of the body as an object and the beliefs that supported this experience. According to McKinley and Hyde (1996):
Prevalence of Sexual Objectification in Media Content: A Snapshot
Effects of Media Sexualization
Trends in the Empirical Research
Makeup of the Studies
My review of the field yielded 109 publications that contained 135 studies. As indicated in olusin 1, these studies spanned the full time frame from 1995 to 2015. However, the bulk of the studies (113 of 135, or 84%) were published in 2008 or later, after the 2007 release of the APA Task Force Report. My suspicion is that this APA report served as a catalyst and helped draw attention to the issue, in general, and to the limitations in the existing work, specifically. The 135 studies represent multiple disciplines, including social psychology, communication, women’s studies, sociology, public health, neuroscience, and developmental psychology. Indeed, the 109 publications (marked by an asterisk in the references) appeared in more than 40 different journals, indicating that interest in this issue is broad.
In terms of the samples within these studies, the makeup represents the typical psychology study, which relies heavily on undergraduate subject pools that are predominantly White, Western, and highly educated (Henrich, Heine, & Norenzayan,2010). There were 137 samples within these 135 studies (two studies tested both a high school and college student sample). Descriptions of these participants are provided in Table 1. In terms of participant age, the majority of participants were undergraduates, with relatively equal numbers of adolescents (usually high school students) and adults. Only five studies tested children. Also, fitting the WEIRD label (i.e., Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic) for psychology research (Henrich et al., 2010), findings indicate that all studies but one originated from Western nations, with most coming from the United States (88 studies, or 64%). Within the 88 samples from the United States, all but nine had a majority White sample (more than 55% White). The nine diverse samples were impressive but may have been a consequence of the regions where the research was conducted (e.g., Southern California, Northern California), because race was seldom a component of the hypotheses within these studies. Only one study of these nine (Gordon, 2008) looked at a homogenous ethnic minority sample. Thus, the findings in this field are based heavily on the experiences of White undergraduates in the United States.
Does Exposure to Sexually Objectifying Media Affect How People See Themselves?
Iwa-ara-ẹni
Body Dissatisfaction
Sexual Health and Relationship Functioning
Does Exposure to Sexually Objectifying Media Content Affect How We Perceive Women?
Ṣiṣẹ imoye
Trait Attributions of Objectified Individuals
Sexist Attitudes and Behavior
Media Sexualization and Sexual Violence
Suggestions For Future Directions
Awọn kefa ti ẹya
Media Genres
Definitions of Media Exposure and Media Stimuli
Potential Mediators and Moderators
Age and Socioeconomic Status
Effects on Sexual Health and Functioning
Standardized Measure Development
Meta-Onínọmbà
Awọn ibaraẹnisọrọ
ipari
Ohun elo Afikun
jo
1. American Àkóbá Association. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report.aspx
2. Arima, A. N. (2003). Gender stereotypes in Japanese television advertisements. Awọn ipa abo, 49(1–2), 81–90. doi:
3. *Aubrey, J. S. (2006a). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Iwe akosile ti ibaraẹnisọrọ, 56, 366–386. doi:
4. *Aubrey, J. S. (2006b). Exposure to sexually objectifying media and body self-perceptions among college women: An examination of the selective exposure hypothesis and the role of moderating variables. Awọn ipa abo, 55, 159–172. doi:
5. *Aubrey, J. S. (2007). The impact of sexually objectifying media exposure on negative body emotions and sexual self-perceptions: Investigating the mediating role of body self-consciousness. Mass Communication and Society, 10(1), 1–23. doi:
6. *Aubrey, J. S. (2010). Looking good versus feeling good: An investigation of media frames of health advice and their effects on women’s body-related self-perceptions. Awọn ipa abo, 63, 50–63. doi:
7. Aubrey, J. S., & Frisby, C. M. (2011). Sexual objectification in music videos: A content analysis comparing gender and genre.Mass Communication and Society, 14(4), 475–501. doi:
8. *Aubrey, J. S., & Gerding, A. (2014). The cognitive tax of self-objectification: Examining sexually objectifying music videos and female emerging adults’ cognitive processing of subsequent advertising. Journal of Media Psychology, 21 (1), 22 – 32.
9. *Aubrey, J. S., Henson, J., Hopper, K. M., & Smith, S. (2009). A picture is worth twenty words (about the self): Testing the priming of visual sexual objectification on women’s self-objectification. Awọn ijabọ Iwadi Ibaraẹnisọrọ, 26(4), 271–284. doi:
10. *Aubrey, J. S., Hopper, K. M., & Mbure, W. (2011). Check that body! The effects of sexually objectifying music videos on college men’s sexual beliefs. Iwe akosile ti Broadcasting ati Itanna Media, 55(3), 360–379. doi:
11. *Aubrey, J. S., & Taylor, L. D. (2009). The role of lad magazines in priming men’s chronic and temporary appearance-related schemata: An investigation of longitudinal and experimental findings. Iwadi Ibaraẹnisọrọ Eniyan, 35, 28–58. doi:
12. Barlett, C., Vowels, C., & Saucier, D. (2008). Meta-analyses of the effects of media images on men’s body-image concerns.Iwe akosile ti Awujọ ati Ẹkọ nipa Ilera, 27 (3), 279 – 310. [CrossRef]
13. Bazzini, D., McIntosh, W., Smith, S., Cook, S., & Harris, C. (1997). The aging woman in popular film: Underrepresented, unattractive, unfriendly, and unintelligent. Awọn ipa abo, 36, 531–543. doi:
14. Beasley, B., & Collins Standley, T. (2002). Shirts vs. skins: Clothing as an indicator of gender role stereotyping in video games. Mass Communication and Society, 5(3), 279–293. doi:
15. *Beck, V. S., Boys, S., Rose, C., & Beck, E. (2012). Violence against women in video games: A prequel or sequel to rape myth acceptance? Iwe akosile ti Iwa-ipa Ibaṣepọ, 27, 3016–3031. doi:
16. *Behm-Morawitz, E., & Mastro, D. (2009). The effects of the sexualization of female video game characters on gender stereotyping and female self-concept. Awọn ipa abo, 61(11–12), 808–823. doi:
17. *Behm-Morawitz, E., & Schipper, S. (2015). Sexing the avatar: Gender, sexualization, and cyber-harassment in a virtual world. Journal of Media Psychology. Atọjade lori ayelujara. ṣe:
18. *Bell, B., Lawton, R., & Dittmar, H. (2007). The impact of thin models in music videos on adolescent girls’ body dissatisfaction. Ara Pipa, 4, 137–145. doi:
19. *Bernard, P., Gervais, S., Allen, J., Campomizzi, S., & Klein, O. (2012). Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Imọ imọran, 23(5), 469–471. doi:
20. *Bernard, P., Gervais, S., Allen, J., Delmee, A., & Klein, O. (2015). From sex objects to human beings: Masking sexual body parts and humanization as moderators to women’s objectification. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 39, 432–446. doi:
21. *Bernard, P., Loughnan, S., Marchal, C., Godart, A., & Klein, O. (2015). The exonerating effect of sexual objectification: Sexual objectification decreases rapist blame in a stranger rape context. Awọn ipa abo, 72, 499–508. doi:
22. *Bongiorno, R., Bain, P. G., & Haslam, N. (2013). When sex doesn’t sell: Using sexualized images of women reduces support for ethical campaigns. PLOS KAN, 8(12), e83311. doi:
23. *Burgess, M., & Burpo, S. (2012). The effects of music videos on college students’ perceptions of rape. College Student Journal, 46 (4), 748 – 763.
24. Burgess, M., Stermer, S. P., & Burgess, S. R. (2007). Sex, lies, and video games: The portrayal of male and female characters on video game covers. Awọn ipa abo, 57, 419–433. doi:
25. Busby, L. (1975). Sex-role research on the mass media. Iwe akosile ti ibaraẹnisọrọ, 25, 107–131. doi:
26. Calogero, R. (2011).
27. Calogero, R., & Thompson, J. K. (2009a). Potential implications of the objectification of women’s bodies for women’s sexual satisfaction. Ara Pipa, 6, 145–148. doi:
28. Calogero, R., & Thompson, J. K. (2009b). Sexual self-esteem in American and British college women: Relations with self-objectification and eating problems. Awọn ipa abo, 60(3–4), 160–173. doi:
29. Cato, M., & Carpentier, F. R. D. (2010). Conceptualization of female empowerment and enjoyment of sexualized characters in reality television. Mass Communication and Society, 13, 270–288. doi:
30. *Choma, B. L., Foster, M. D., & Radford, E. (2007). Use of objectification theory to examine the effects of a media literacy intervention on women. Awọn ipa abo, 56(9–10), 581–590. doi:
31. *Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J., & Fiske, S. (2010). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Iwe akosile ti Imọ Neuroscience, 23(3), 540–551. doi:
32. *Civile, C., & Obhi, S. (2015). Power, objectification, and recognition of sexualized women and men. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin. Atọjade lori ayelujara. ṣe:
33. Clarke, L., & Korotchenko, A. (2011). Aging and the body: A review. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30(3), 495–510. doi:
34. Claudat, K., & Warren, C. (2014). Self-objectification, body self-consciousness during sexual activities, and sexual satisfaction in college women. Ara Pipa, 11(4), 509–515. doi:
35. Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Howard, E. (2013). Emerging in a digital world: A decade review of media use, effects, and gratifications in emerging adulthood. Agbalagba Ti n jade, 1(2), 125–137. doi:
36. *Dakanalis, A., Di Mattei, V. E., Bagliacca, E. P., Prunas, A., Sarno, L., Priva, G., & Zanetti, M. A. (2012). Disordered eating behaviors among Italian men: Objectifying media and sexual orientation differences. njẹ Ẹjẹ, 20(5), 356–367. doi:
37. *Daniels, E. (2009). Sex objects, athletes, and sexy athletes: How media representations of women athletes can impact adolescent girls and college women. Iwe akosile ti awọn ọmọde Iwadi, 24(4), 399–422. doi:
38. *Daniels, E. (2012). Sexy versus strong: What girls and women think of female athletes. Iwe akọọlẹ ti Ẹkọ nipa Imọ-jinlẹ Idagbasoke ti a lo, 33, 79–90. doi:
39. *Daniels, E., & Wartena, H. (2011). Athlete or sex symbol: What boys think of media representations of female athletes. Awọn ipa abo, 65(7–8), 566–579. doi:
40. Daniels, E., & Zurbriggen, E. (2016). The price of sexy: Viewers’ perceptions of a sexualized versus nonsexualized Facebook profile photograph. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 2–14. doi:
41. *Dens, N., De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2009). Effects of scarcely dressed models in advertising on body esteem for Belgian men and women. Awọn ipa abo, 60, 366–378. doi:
42. De Vries, D. A., & Peter, J. (2013). Women on display: The effect of portraying the self online on women’s self-objectification. Awọn kọmputa ni iwa eniyan, 29, 1483–1489. doi:
43. *Dill, K., Brown, B., & Collins, M. (2008). Effects of exposure to sex-stereotyped video game characters on tolerance of sexual harassment. Iwe akosile ti Egbogi Social Psychology, 44, 1402–1408. doi:
44. Dill, K., & Thill, K. (2007). Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Awọn ipa abo, 57, 851–864. doi:
45. Downs, E., & Smith, S. L. (2010). Keeping abreast of hypersexuality: A video game character content analysis. Awọn ipa abo, 62(11), 721–733. doi:
46. *Driesmans, K., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2015). Playing a videogame with a sexualized female character increases adolescents’ rape myth acceptance and tolerance toward sexual harassment. Games for Health Journal, 4(2), 91–94. doi:
47. *Eggermont, S., Beullens, K., & Van Den Bulck, J. (2005). Television viewing and adolescent females’ body dissatisfaction: The mediating role of opposite sex expectations. Communications, 30, 343–357. doi:
48. *Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). The mediating role of appearance comparisons in the relationship between media usage and self-objectification in young women. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 39, 447–457. doi:
49. *Farquhar, J. C., & Wasylkiw, L. (2007). Media images of men: Trends and consequences of body conceptualization.Psychology ti Awọn ọkunrin ati Masculinity, 8(3), 145–160. doi:
50. Ferris, A. L., Smith, S. W., Greenberg, B. S., & Smith, S. L. (2007). The content of reality dating shows and viewer perceptions of dating. Iwe akosile ti ibaraẹnisọrọ, 57(3), 490–510. doi:
51. Flynn, M. A., Park, S.-Y., Morin, D. T., & Stana, A. (2015). Anything but real: Body idealization and objectification of MTV docusoap characters. Awọn ipa abo, 72(5–6), 173–182. doi:
52. *Ford, T. E., Boxer, C. F., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J. R. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Ti ara ẹni ati Bulletin Ẹkọ nipa Awujọ, 34(2), 159–170. doi:
53. *Ford, T. E., Woodzicka, J. A., Petit, W. E., Richardson, K., & Lappi, S. K. (2015). Sexist humor as a trigger of state self-objectification in women. Humor, 28(2), 253–269. doi:
54. *Fox, J., & Bailenson, J. (2009). Virtual virgins and vamps: The effects of exposure to female characters’ sexualized appearance and gaze in an immersive media environment. Awọn ipa abo, 61, 147–157. doi:
55. *Fox, J., Bailenson, J. N., & Tricase, L. (2013). The embodiment of sexualized virtual selves: The Proteus effect and experiences of self-objectification via avatars. Awọn kọmputa ni iwa eniyan, 29(3), 930–938. doi:
56. *Fox, J., Ralston, R. A., Cooper, C. K., & Jones, K. A. (2014). Sexualized avatars lead to women’s self-objectification and acceptance of rape myths. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 39(3), 349–362. doi:
57. Fredrickson, B., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 21, 173–206. doi:
58. Fredrickson, B., Roberts, T., Noll, S., Quinn, D., & Twenge, J. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Akosile ti eniyan ati Awujọ Awujọ, 75, 269–284. doi:
59. Frisby, C. M., & Aubrey, J. S. (2012). Race and genre in the use of sexual objectification in female artists’ music videos.Howard Journal of Communications, 23(1), 66–87. doi:
60. Fullerton, J. A., & Kendrick, A. (2000). Portrayal of men and women in U.S. Spanish-language television commercials.Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(1), 128–142. doi:
61. *Galdi, S., Maass, A., & Cadinu, M. (2014). Objectifying media: Their effect on gender role norms and sexual harassment of women. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 38(3), 398–413. doi:
62. Ganahl, J. D., Kim, K., & Baker, S. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of network commercials: How advertisers portray gender.Media Report to Women, 31 (2), 11 – 15.
63. Garcia Coll, C., Lamberty, G., Jenkins, R., McAdoo, H., Crnic, K., Wasik, B., & Garcia, H. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Idagbasoke Ọmọ, 67(5), 1891–1914. doi:
64. Gervais, S., Bernard, P., Klein, O., & Allen, J. (2013). Toward a unified theory of objectification and dehumanization.Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 60, 1-23. [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Ayelujara ti Imọ ®]
65. *Gervais, S., Vescio, T., & Allen, J. (2011). When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility. Iwe akọọlẹ British ti Social Psychology, 51(4), 499–513. doi:
66. *Gervais, S., Vesico, T. K., Förster, J., Maass, A., & Suitner, C. (2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias. Iwe akọọlẹ European ti Psychology ti Awujọ, 42(6), 743–753. doi:
67. *Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low- and high-status jobs.Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 29, 389–395. doi:
68. *Gordon, M. (2008). Media contributions to African American girls’ focus on beauty and appearance: Exploring the consequences of sexual objectification. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 32, 245–256. doi:
69. *Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2009). Body objectification, MTV, and psychological outcomes among female adolescents. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2840–2858. doi:
70. Grabe, S., Ward, L. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2008). The role of the media in body image concerns among women: A meta-analysis of experimental and correlational studies. Iwe akosile imọran, 134 (3), 460 – 476. [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Ayelujara ti Imọ ®]
71. Graff, K., Murnen, S., & Krause, A. K. (2013). Low-cut shirts and high-heeled shoes: Increased sexualization across time in magazine depictions of girls. Awọn ipa abo, 69(11–12), 571–582. doi:
72. *Graff, K., Murnen, S., & Smolak, L. (2012). Too sexualized to be taken seriously? Perceptions of a girl in childlike vs. sexualizing clothing. Awọn ipa abo, 66, 764–775. doi:
73. *Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Barrett, L. (2011). More than a body: Mind perception and the nature of objectification. Akosile ti eniyan ati Awujọ Awujọ, 101(6), 1207–1220. doi:
74. Groesz, L. M., Levine, M. P., & Murnen, S. K. (2002). The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Iwe akosile ti kariaye ti Awọn rudurudu Jijẹ, 31, 1-16. [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Ayelujara ti Imọ ®], [CSA]
75. *Gurung, R., & Chrouser, C. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter?Awọn ipa abo, 57, 91–99. doi:
76. *Halliwell, E., Malson, H., & Tischner, I. (2011). Are contemporary media images which seem to display women as sexually empowered actually harmful to women? Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 35(1), 38–45. doi:
77. *Hargreaves, D. A., & Tiggemann, M. (2003). Female “thin ideals” media images and boys’ attitudes toward girls. Awọn ipa abo, 49(9–10), 539–544. doi:
78. *Harper, B., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The effect of thin ideal media images on women’s self-objectification, mood, and body image. Awọn ipa abo, 58, 649–657. doi:
79. *Harrison, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Women’s sports media, self-objectification, and mental health in Black and White adolescent females. Iwe akosile ti ibaraẹnisọrọ, 53, 216–232. doi:
80. *Harrison, L. A., & Secarea, A. M. (2010). College students’ attitudes toward the sexualization of professional women athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior, 33 (4), 403 – 426.
81. Hatton, E., & Trautner, M. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Ibalopo ati Asa, 15(3), 256–278. doi:
82. Heflick, N., & Goldenberg, J. (2014). Seeing eye to body: The literal objectification of women. Awọn Itọsọna lọwọlọwọ ni Imọ-ọpọlọ, 23(3), 225–229. doi:
83. *Heflick, N., Goldenberg, J., Cooper, D., & Puvia, E. (2011). From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality, and competence. Iwe akosile ti Egbogi Social Psychology, 47, 572–581. doi:
84. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Awọn ẹkọ ẹkọ iṣeejẹ ati iṣan ọpọlọ, 33, 61–83. doi:
85. Hine, R. (2011). In the margins: The impact of sexualised images on the mental health of ageing women. Awọn ipa abo, 65(7–8), 632–646. doi:
86. *Hitlan, R. T., Pryor, J. B., Hesson-McInnis, S., & Olson, M. (2009). Antecedents of gender harassment: An analysis of person and situation factors. Awọn ipa abo, 61(11–12), 794–807. doi:
87. *Holland, E., & Haslam, N. (2013). Worth the weight: The objectification of overweight versus thin targets. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 37(4), 462–468. doi:
88. *Holland, E., & Haslam, N. (2015). Cute little things: The objectification of prepubescent girls. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin. Atọjade lori ayelujara. ṣe:
89. Holmstrom, A. J. (2004). The effects of the media on body image: A meta-analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 196-217. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Ayelujara ti Imọ ®]
90. *Hopper, K. M., & Aubrey, J. S. (2011). Examining the impact of celebrity gossip magazine coverage of pregnant celebrities on pregnant women’s self-objectification. Iwadi Ibaraẹnisọrọ, 40(6), 767–788. doi:
91. *Hust, S., & Lei, M. (2008). Sexual objectification, sports programming, and music television. Media Report to Women, 36 (1), 16 – 23.
92. Ibroscheva, E. (2007). Caught between East and West? Portrayals of gender in Bulgarian television advertisements. Awọn ipa abo, 57(5–6), 409–418. doi:
93. Johnson, P., McCreary, D., & Mills, J. (2007). Effects of exposure to objectified male and female media images on men’s psychological well-being. Psychology ti Awọn ọkunrin ati Masculinity, 8(2), 95–102. doi:
94. *Johnson, V., & Gurung, R. (2011). Defusing the objectification of women by other women: The role of competence. Awọn ipa abo, 65, 177–188. doi:
95. *Kim, S. Y., Seo, Y. S., & Baek, K. Y. (2013). Face consciousness among South Korean women: A culture-specific extension of objectification theory. Iwe akosile ti Ẹkọ nipa Imọran imọran, 61(1), 24–36. doi:
96. *Kistler, M. E., & Lee, M. J. (2009). Does exposure to sexual hip-hop music videos influence the sexual attitudes of college students? Mass Communication and Society, 13(1), 67–86. doi:
97. *Krawczyk, R., & Thompson, J. K. (2015). The effects of advertisements that sexually objectify women on state body dissatisfaction and judgments of women: The moderating roles of gender and internalization. Ara Pipa, 15, 109–119. doi:
98. *Lanis, K., & Covell, K. (1995). Images of women in advertisements: Effects on attitudes related to sexual aggression. Awọn ipa abo, 32(9–10), 639–649. doi:
99. *Lavine, H., Sweeney, D., & Wagner, S. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertisements: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Ti ara ẹni ati Bulletin Ẹkọ nipa Awujọ, 25(8), 1049–1058. doi:
100. *Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. Iwe akọọlẹ European ti Psychology ti Awujọ, 40, 709-717. [Ayelujara ti Imọ ®]
101. Loughnan, S., & Pacilli, M. (2014). Seeing (and treating) others as sexual objects: Toward a more complete mapping of sexualization. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21(3), 309–325. doi:
102. *Loughnan, S., Pina, A., Vasquez, E. A., & Puvia, E. (2013). Sexual objectification increases rape victim blame and decreases perceived suffering. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 37(4), 455–461. doi:
103. *Machia, M., & Lamb, S. (2009). Sexualized innocence: Effects of magazine ads portraying adult women as sexy little girls.Journal of Media Psychology, 21(1), 15–24. doi:
104. *MacKay, N., & Covell, K. (1997). The impact of women in advertisements on attitudes toward women. Awọn ipa abo, 36(9–10), 573–583. doi:
105. Manago, A. M., Ward, L. M., Lemm, K., Reed, L., & Seabrook, R. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Awọn ipa abo, 72(1–2), 1–14. doi:
106. McKinley, N., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 20, 181–215. doi:
107. Messineo, M. J. (2008). Does advertising on Black entertainment television portray more positive gender representations compared to broadcast networks? Awọn ipa abo, 59(9–10), 752–764. doi:
108. *Michaels, M. S., Parent, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2013). Does exposure to muscularity-idealizing images have self-objectification consequences for heterosexual and sexual minority men? Psychology ti Awọn ọkunrin ati Masculinity, 14(2), 175–183. doi:
109. *Milburn, M. A., Mather, R., & Conrad, S. D. (2000). The effects of viewing R-rated movie scenes that objectify women on perceptions of date rape. Awọn ipa abo, 43(9–10), 645–664. doi:
110. Miller, M., & Summers, A. (2007). Gender differences in video game characters’ roles, appearances, and attire as portrayed in video game magazines. Awọn ipa abo, 57(9–10), 733–742. doi:
111. *Mischner, I. H. S., van Schie, H. T., Wigboldus, D. H. J., van Baaren, R. B., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2013). Thinking big: The effect of sexually objectifying music videos on bodily self-perceptions in young women. Ara Pipa, 10(1), 26–34. doi:
112. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 32, 377–398. doi:
113. *Morry, M., & Staska, S. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(4), 269–279. doi:
114. *Mulgrew, K. E., & Hennes, S. M. (2015). The effects of functionality- and aesthetic-focused images on Australian women’s body satisfaction. Awọn ipa abo, 72(3–4), 127–139. doi:
115. *Mulgrew, K. E., Johnson, L. M., Lane, B. R., & Katsikitis, M. (2013). The effect of aesthetic versus process images on men’s body satisfaction. Psychology ti Awọn ọkunrin ati Masculinity, 15(4), 452–459. doi:
116. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2013).
117. Nelson, M. R., & Paek, H.-J. (2008). Nudity of female and male models in primetime TV advertising across seven countries.International Journal of Advertising, 27(5), 715–744. doi:
118. *Nezlek, J. B., Krohn, W., Wilson, D., & Maruskin, L. (2015). Gender differences in reactions to the sexualization of athletes.Iwe akosile ti Psychology Awujọ, 155(1), 1–11. doi:
119. Noll, S., & Fredrickson, B. (1998). A meditational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating.Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 22, 623–636. doi:
120. Nowatzki, J., & Morry, M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 33, 95–107. doi:
121. *Overstreet, N., Quinn, D., & Marsh, K. (2015). Objectification in virtual romantic contexts: Perceived discrepancies between self and partner ideals differentially affect body consciousness in women and men. Awọn ipa abo, 73(9–10), 442–452. doi:
122. *Pennel, H., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2015). The empowering (super) heroine? The effects of sexualized female characters in superhero films on women. Awọn ipa abo, 72(5–6), 211–220. doi:
123. *Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Awọn ipa abo, 56, 381–395. doi:
124. Petersen, J., & Hyde, J. S. (2013). Peer sexual harassment and disordered eating in early adolescence. Ẹkọ nipa idagbasoke, 49(1), 184–195. doi:
125. Pope, H. G., Olivardia, R., Borowiecki, J. J., & Cohane, G. H. (2001). The growing commercial value of the male body: A longitudinal survey of advertising in women’s magazines. Awoasinwin ati Psychosomatics, 70, 189–192. doi:
126. *Prichard, I., & Tiggemann, M. (2012). The effect of simultaneous exercise and exposure to thin-ideal music videos on women’s state self-objectification, mood, and body satisfaction. Awọn ipa abo, 67(3–4), 201–210. doi:
127. Prieler, M., & Centeno, D. (2013). Gender representation in Philippine television advertisements. Awọn ipa abo, 69(5–6), 276–288. doi:
128. *Puvia, E., & Vaes, J. (2013). Being a body: Women’s appearance related self-views and their dehumanization of sexually objectified female targets. Awọn ipa abo, 68(7–8), 484–495. doi:
129. Ramsey, L., & Hoyt, T. (2015). The object of desire: How being objectified creates sexual pressure for women in heterosexual relationships. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 39(2), 151–170. doi:
130. Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010, January). Iran M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J.Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED527859
131. *Rollero, C. (2013). Men and women facing objectification: The effects of media models on well-being, self-esteem and ambivalent sexism. Revista De Psicología Social: International Journal of Social Psychology, 28(3), 373–382. doi:
132. *Romero-Sanchez, M., Toro-García, V., Horvath, M. A., & Megias, J. L. (2015). More than a magazine: Exploring the links between lads’ mags, rape myth acceptance and rape proclivity. Iwe akosile ti Iwa-ipa Ibaṣepọ. Atọjade lori ayelujara. ṣe:
133. Rouner, D., Slater, M. D., & Domenech-Rodriguez, M. (2003). Adolescent evaluation of gender role and sexual imagery in television advertisements. Iwe akosile ti Broadcasting ati Itanna Media, 47(3), 435–454. doi:
134. Rudman, L., & Borgida, E. (1995). The afterglow of construct accessibility: The behavioral consequences of priming men to view women as sexual objects. Iwe akosile ti Egbogi Social Psychology, 31, 493–517. doi:
135. *Schmidt, A. F., & Kistemaker, L. M. (2015). The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis revisited: Valid indicator of sexual objectification or methodological artifact? Imọrisi, 134, 77–84. doi:
136. *Schooler, D. (2015). The woman next to me: Pairing powerful and objectifying representations of women. Awọn itupalẹ ti Awọn Oran Awujọ ati Eto Awujọ, 15(1), 198–212. doi:
137. Schooler, D., Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2004). Who’s that girl: Television’s role in the body image development of young White and Black women. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 28, 38–47. doi:
138. *Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2015). Media exposure, extracurricular activities, and appearance-related comments as predictors of female adolescents’ self-objectification. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 39(3), 375–389. doi:
139. *Smith, L. R. (2015). What’s the best exposure? Examining media representation of female athletes and the impact on collegiate athletes’ self-objectification. Communication and Sport. Atọjade lori ayelujara. ṣe:
140. Smith, S. L., Choueiti, M., Prescott, A., & Pieper, K. (2012). Gender roles and occupations: A look at character attributes and job-related aspirations in film and television. Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media. Retrieved from http://seejane.org/wp-content/uploads/full-study-gender-roles-and-occupations-v2.pdf
141. Spitzack, C. (1990). Confessing excess: Women and the politics of body reduction. Albany: State University of New York Tẹ.
142. *Sprankle, E. L., End, C. M., & Bretz, M. N. (2012). Sexually degrading music videos and lyrics: Their effects on males’ aggression and endorsement of rape myths and sexual stereotypes. Journal of Media Psychology, 24(1), 31–39. doi:
143. Stankiewicz, J. M., & Rosselli, F. (2008). Women as sex objects and victims in print advertisements. Awọn ipa abo, 58(7–8), 579–589. doi:
144. *Starr, C., & Ferguson, G. (2012). Sexy dolls, sexy grade-schoolers? Media and maternal influences on young girls’ self-sexualization. Awọn ipa abo, 67(7–8), 463–476. doi:
145. *Stone, E., Brown, C., & Jewell, J. (2015). The sexualized girl: A within-gender stereotype among elementary school children. Idagbasoke Ọmọ, 86, 1604–1622. doi:
146. *Strahan, E., Lafrance, A., Wilson, A., Ethier, N., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. (2008). Victoria’s dirty secret: How sociocultural norms influence adolescent girls and women. Ti ara ẹni ati Bulletin Ẹkọ nipa Awujọ, 34(2), 288–301. doi:
147. *Swami, V., Coles, R., Wilson, E., Salem, N., Wyrozumska, K., & Furnham, A. (2010). Oppressive beliefs at play: Associations among beauty ideals and practices and individual differences in sexism, objectification of others, and media exposure.Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 34, 365–379. doi:
148. *ter Bogt, T. F. M., Engels, R. C. M. E., Bogers, S., & Kloosterman, M. (2010). “Shake it baby, shake it”: Media preferences, sexual attitudes, and gender stereotypes among adolescents. Awọn ipa abo, 63(11–12), 844–859. doi:
149. *Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2015). The role of self-objectification in the mental health of early adolescent girls: Predictors and consequences. Iwe akosile ti Psychology, 40(7), 704–711. doi:
150. Tiggemann, M., & Williams, E. (2012). The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Ẹkọ nipa ọkan ti awọn obirin ni idamẹrin, 36, 66–75. doi:
151. *Tolman, D. L., Kim, J. L., Schooler, D., & Sorsoli, C. L. (2007). Rethinking the associations between television viewing and adolescent sexuality development: Bringing gender into focus. Iwe akosile ti ilera ọmọ ọdọ, 40 (1),
152. Turner, J. S. (2011). Sex and the spectacle of music videos: An examination of the portrayal of race and sexuality in music videos. Awọn ipa abo, 64(3–4), 173–191. doi:
153. Uray, N., & Burnaz, S. (2003). An analysis of the portrayal of gender roles in Turkish television advertisements. Awọn ipa abo, 48(1–2), 77–87. doi:
154. *Vaes, J., Paladino, P., & Puvia, E. (2011). Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women. Iwe akọọlẹ European ti Psychology ti Awujọ, 41, 774–785. doi:
155. *Vance, K., Sutter, M., Perrin, P., & Heesacker, M. (2015). The media’s sexual objectification of women, rape myth acceptance, and interpersonal violence. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 24(5), 569–587. doi:
156. *Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2012). Understanding sexual objectification: A comprehensive approach toward media exposure and girls’ internalization of beauty ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Iwe akosile ti ibaraẹnisọrọ, 62(5), 869–887. doi:
157. *Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2013). Sexualization of adolescent boys: Media exposure and boy’s internalization of appearance ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Awọn ọkunrin ati awọn Masculinities, 16(3), 283–306. doi:
158. *Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2015). The role of mass media in adolescents’ sexual behaviors: Exploring the explanatory value of the three-step self-objectification process. Ile itaja ti iwa ibalopọ, 44(3), 729–742. doi:
159. *Vandenbosch, L., Muise, A., Eggermont, S., & Impett, E. A. (2015). Sexualizing reality television: Associations with trait and state self-objectification. Ara Pipa, 13, 62–66. doi:
160. *Wack, E., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2008). Cyber sexy: Electronic game play and perceptions of attractiveness among college-aged men. Ara Pipa, 5(4), 365–374. doi:
161. Wallis, C. (2011). Performing gender: A content analysis of gender display in music videos. Awọn ipa abo, 64(3–4), 160–172. doi:
162. *Ward, L. M. (2002). Does television exposure affect emerging adults’ attitudes and assumptions about sexual relationships? Correlational and experimental confirmation. Iwe akosile ti odo ati odo, 31(1), 1–15. doi:
163. Ward, L. M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23(3), 347–388. doi:
164. *Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: Association between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behaviors. Iwe akosile ti Iwadi lori Ọdọmọkunrin, 16(1), 133–156. doi:
165. Ward, L. M., Hansbrough, E., & Walker, E. (2005). Contributions of music video exposure to Black adolescents’ gender and sexual schemas. Iwe akosile ti awọn ọmọde Iwadi, 20, 143–166. doi:
166. Ward, L. M., Rivadeneyra, R., Thomas, K., Day, K., & Epstein, M. (2012).
167. *Ward, L. M., Seabrook, R. C., Manago, A., & Reed, L. (2016). Contributions of diverse media to self-sexualization among undergraduate women and men. Awọn ipa abo, 74 (1), 12 – 23. doi: 10.1007 / s11199-015-0548-z [Ayelujara ti Imọ ®]
168. *Ward, L. M., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2015). The impact of men’s magazines on adolescent boys’ objectification and courtship beliefs. Iwe akosile ti ọdọ, 39, 49–58. doi:
169. *Wookey, M., Graves, N., & Butler, J. C. (2009). Effects of a sexy appearance on perceived competence of women. Iwe akosile ti Psychology Awujọ, 149(1), 116–118. doi:
170. Wright, P. J. (2009). Sexual socialization messages in mainstream entertainment mass media: A review and synthesis.Ibalopo ati Asa, 13, 181–200. doi:
171. *Wright, P. J., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Men’s objectifying media consumption, objectification of women, and attitudes supportive of violence against women. Ile itaja ti iwa ibalopọ. Atọjade lori ayelujara. ṣe:
172. *Yao, M., Mahood, C., & Linz, D. (2009). Sexual priming, gender stereotyping, and likelihood to sexually harass: Examining the cognitive effects of playing a sexually explicit video game. Awọn ipa abo, 62, 77–88. doi:
173. Zurbriggen, E. (2013). Objectification, self-objectification, and societal change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 188–215. doi:
174. *Zurbriggen, E., Ramsey, L., & Jaworski, B. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Awọn ipa abo, 64, 449–462. doi: