USteele et al., Isikhulumi se2013 Nicole Prause wenza izingxoxo eziningi ngaye ngoJulayi, ocwaningweni we-2013 EEG kubantu ekhononda ngobunzima bokulawula ukusetshenziswa kwabo kocansi. Ukuphawula ngaphansi kwe Psychology Today interview kaNicole Prause, isazi semfundo ephakeme uprofesa wezokuxhumana uJohn A. Johnson Wathi:
Igebe ekungeneni okunengqondo
{https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/542939#comment-542939}
Kuthunyelwe ngu- UJohn A. Johnson Ph.D. on July 19, 2013 - 2:35 pm
I-Mustanski iyabuza, "Iyini injongo yocwaningo?" Futhi uPrause uyaphendula, "Ucwaningo lwethu luvivinywe ukuthi ngabe abantu ababika izinkinga ezinjalo [izinkinga zokulawula ukubuka kwabo kwe-eerotic online] kubonakala sengathi bangamanye amilutha ezimpendulo zabo zobuchopho ezithombeni zobulili."
Kodwa isifundo asizange siqhathanise ukuqoshwa kobuchopho kubantu abanenkinga eqondisa ukubuka kwabo kwe-eerotic inthanethi ekuqopheni kobuchopho ezilutha izidakamizwa kanye nokuqoshwa kobuchopho kusuka eqenjini lokulawulwa elingelona umlutha, okungaba yindlela ecacile yokubona ukuthi ubuchopho buphendula kanjani kulabo abakhathazekile iqembu libukeka njengezimpendulo zobuchopho zezidakamizwa noma ezingekho izilingo.
Esikhundleni salokho, u-Prause uthi ukuklanywa ngaphakathi kwesifundo kwakuyindlela engcono, lapho izifundo zocwaningo zikhonza njengeqembu labo lokulawula. Ngalesi sakhiwo, bathole ukuthi impendulo ye-EEG yezihloko zabo (njengeqembu) ezithombeni ezithandayo zomelele kunezimpendulo zabo ze-EEG kwezinye izinhlobo zezithombe. Lokhu kuboniswa kwisigcawu se-waveform se-inline (nakuba ngesinye isizathu igrafu ihluke kakhulu kusuka kugrafu langempela esihlokweni esishicilelwe).
Ngakho leli qembu elibika ukuthi kunenkathazo elawula ukubuka kwabo kwe-eerotic e-intanethi kunempendulo e-EEG enamandla kunezithombe ezibucayi kunezinye izinhlobo zezithombe. Ingabe izidakamizwa zibonisa impendulo efana ne-EEG lapho ihanjiswa izidakamizwa ezizikhethelayo? Asazi. Ingabe okuvamile, okungewona umlutha kubonisa impendulo eqinile njengeqembu elikhathazekile ukuya e-etica? Futhi, asazi. Asazi ukuthi leli phethini le-EEG lifana yini namaphethini obuchopho bomlutha noma abangewona umlutha.
Ithimba labacwaningi lePrause lithi liyakwazi ukukhombisa ukuthi impendulo ephakeme ye-EEG yezifundo zabo ku-erotica iyimpendulo yokulutha kwengqondo noma impendulo ebuchosheni ephezulu kakhulu ngokuhlanganisa iqoqo lemibuzo yemibuzo ngokuhlukana ngakunye kwempendulo ye-EEG. Kepha ukuchaza umehluko empendulweni ye-EEG ngumbuzo ohlukile ekuhloleni ukuthi ngabe impendulo yeqembu lilonke ibukeka ilutha noma cha. Iqembu lePrause labika ukuthi okuwukuphela kwesibalo esibalulekile sempendulo ye-EEG kwakuwukuhlangana okungahambi kahle (r = -. 33) nesifiso sobulili nomlingani. Ngamanye amagama, kwakukhona ukuthambekela okuncane kwezifundo ezinezimpendulo ezinamandla ze-EEG ku-erotica yokuba nesifiso esiphansi socansi nomlingani. Lokho kusho kanjani ukuthi izimpendulo zobuchopho zabantu abanenkinga yokulawula ukubukwa kwabo kwe-eerotica ziyefana nezidakamizwa noma ezingewona imilutha ezine-libido ephezulu?
Ezinyangeni ezimbili kamuva uJohnson wakushicilela lokhu Psychology Today okuthunyelwe kwebhulogi akubhale ngakho ngaphansi kwengxoxo kaPrause.
Mhlawumbe imibono yangaphambili kaPrause iholele esiphethweni esiphikisana nemiphumela {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/556448#comment-556448}
Kuthunyelwe ngu- UJohn A. Johnson Ph.D. on September 22, 2013 - 9:00 pm
Ingqondo yami isaqhubeka nokubanga isimangalo sePrause sokuthi ubuchopho babafundi bakhe abuzange buphendule ezithombeni zocansi ezinjengobuchopho bezidakamizwa eziluthayo buphendula kumuthi wabo, uma kubikwa ukuthi ubika ukufundwa okuphezulu kwe-P300 kwezithombe zocansi. Njengemilutha ekhombisa ama-P300 spikes lapho ihanjiswa nomuthi wayo wokuzikhethela.
Angasithola kanjani isiphetho esiphikisana nemiphumela yangempela? Ngicabanga ukuthi kungenziwa emibonweni yakhe yangaphambilini – lokho abelindele ukukuthola. Ngabhala ngalokhu kwenye indawo.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cui-bono/201308/preconceptions-may-color-conclusions-about-sex-addiction
Johnson Psychology Today okuthunyelwe: Imibono yangaphambili ingenza iziphetho zombala mayelana nokulutha kocansi. Ukuthatha okubalulekile: Kokuthunyelwe kwakhe uJohnson uchaza uPrause ngemuva kwendlela yokuziphatha kwezigcawu, njengezinsongo ezisemthethweni (njengoba ayenzile ngoWilson) nokushaya Psychology Today abahleli ngezinsongo, babaphoqa ukuthi basuse amabhulogi amabili agxeke okushiwo nguPrause okungasekelwa (1 - Ukuhlaziya kukaGary Wilson kokuthi “Steele et al., 2013 ″, 2 - ukuhlaziywa nguRobert Weiss, LCSW & Stefanie Carnes PhD). Uphinde uchaza ukuthola ama-imeyili asongayo futhi asongela kusuka ku-Prause:
Ngesikhathi ngiqala ukuzwa lokhu okuthunyelwe kwebhulogi futhi ngaqala ukuyiqamba cishe inyanga edlule, inhloso yami yasekuqaleni kwakuwukuchaza ngokuningiliziwe ngezindlela ezithile engizibonayo abaphikisi bezinhlangothi eziphambene ze-mpikiswano ngokugqamisa noma ngokudlulisela phambili izingxabano zabo ngaphesheya kwedatha yangempela esifundweni. Ngagcina sengishintsha ingqondo yami lapho ngibheka ukushisa komlilo okuqhuma phakathi kwabahlanganyeli bezingxoxo. Akuzona izimpikiswano mayelana nokuthi idatha idlulisela ukuthini, kepha izinsongo zokudumisa, okufaka phakathi izinsongo zesenzo somthetho. Ngabona ukuthunyelwe kwe-blog ye-PT kubanjwe, kubonakala sengathi omunye wamaqembu afuna ukuthi ihlulwe. Ngaze ngathola ama-imeyili ambalwa angithukuthele ngokwami ngoba omunye wezinhlangothi wayezwile ukuthi ngiphakamise imibuzo mayelana nokuchazwa okufanele kocwaningo olubucayi esithangamini sesayensi.
Ngakho-ke, nginqume ukuthungatha okwenziwe ngaphandle kwekamelo. Ngiphinde nginqume ukuqhubeka nokuthumela lapha engangikuqalile ngenyanga eyedlule, ngimane njeo ukunikeza isibonelo sesimangalo sami sokuthi isayensi ayiyona ibhizinisi elizimisele, futhi ukuthi ososayensi bangempela bangabandakanyeka ngokwabo futhi ngokomzwelo emsebenzini wabo. Ukuphikisana okubuzwayo kuyisibonelo esihle kakhulu isifiso esivamile phakathi kwabacwaningi base-US ukuze baveze imiphumela ephansi yesayensi.
Lokhu kwathukuthelisa uMduseli owayephikisana (esebenzisa amagama amanga) noJohnson esigabeni sokuphawula sakhe Psychology Today okuthunyelwe kwebhulogi mayelana nocwaningo lukaPrause lwe-2013 EEG (Qaphela ukuthi uJohnson akanawo umbono wokulutha ngokocansi). Kuyiqiniso ukuthi "ongaziwa" nguNicole Prause; mhlawumbe uJen H naye.
I-PRAUSE & JOHNSON "INGXABANO"
LOL {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/556243#comment-556243}
Ihanjiswe nguJen on September 21, 2013 - 5:44 pm
Siyabonga uDkt Johnson,
Mina futhi ngiye ngaphasi kwezinto ezizungezile ezizungezile lezi, ahem, ezithandwa kakhulu, izidakamizwa zokulutha ubulili.
Sikufisela inhlanhla uma unganquma ukuziphonsa emgodini. Ngizoba nethemba lomsebenzi omuhle wokuqamba ngale ndaba esikhathini esizayo esiseduze.
Mayelana
Jen H., CSW
Ukukhathazeka yizwi kuwo! {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/556450#comment-556450}
Kuthunyelwe ngu- UJohn A. Johnson Ph.D. on September 22, 2013 - 9:10 pm
Siyabonga ngokuphawula kwakho, Jen.
Kubonakala kimi ukuthi ukufutheka inkemba ehlangene kabili. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, ukukhathalela isihloko kusho ukuthi umuntu uzimisele ukutshala isikhathi esiningi namandla kule ndaba. Kungani umuntu angacwaninga okuthile ngaphandle kokuba abe nesifiso saso?
Ngakolunye uhlangothi, uma umuntu othakazelayo esevele enengqondo yakhe, wonke amandla ashisekayo azoqondiswa kokungenzeka, okulungile noma okungalungile. Futhi uma kungalungile, ukufutheka kuholela ekumpumpheni eqinisweni.
Ngingahle ngiphume kulezi mpikiswano bese ngenza abacwaningi abanomqondo banqume.
Iwebhusayithi eya ekukhwabaneni? {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/565636#comment-565636}
Kuthunyelwe ngu-Anonymous on November 2, 2013 - 6:26 pm
Njengoba usho, le mpikiswano selokhu yagcwala ama-ajenda. Kodwa-ke, ukuxhumanisa impikiswano yesayensi nomuntu othile ongahleliwe ozama ukuthengisa izincwadi? Lokhu kuthuthukiswa kanjani? Ngicabanga nokuthi ulahlekelwe iphuzu locwaningo… bonke abantu bakhombisa iphethini. Leli qembu (1) libukeka ngokufana nawo wonke umuntu, futhi (2) ukuze uqiniseke, isilinganiso sobuchopho sasingahlobene nanoma yisiphi isilinganiso sobungqingili (noma ngabe bekuwukufisa ukuya ocansini nomlingani). Angiqiniseki ukuthi kungani bekungahlobene nesifiso sokushaya indlwabu futhi, yize ababhali benikeze isikali sonke futhi bekhuluma ngokuthi kungani lokho kungaba njalo.
Mhlawumbe ngiphuthelwa iphuzu {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/565666#comment-565666}
Kuthunyelwe ngu- UJohn A. Johnson Ph.D. on November 2, 2013 - 9:39 pm
Uma iphuzu locwaningo bekungukukhombisa ukuthi “bonke abantu” (hhayi nje abasolwa ngokuba imilutha yezocansi) babonisa ukuphakama e-P300 amplitude lapho bebuka izithombe zocansi, uqinisile – angilitholi iphuzu, ngoba isifundo besisebenzisa kuphela okusolakala ukuthi ucansi imilutha. Uma ucwaningo * belusebenzise iqembu lokuqhathanisa elingelona umlutha futhi lathola ukuthi baphinde babonisa i-P300 spike, khona-ke abacwaningi bebengaba necala ngesimangalo sabo sokuthi ubuchopho balabo okuthiwa yimilutha yezocansi benza okufanayo nabangewona imilutha , ngakho-ke mhlawumbe awukho umehluko phakathi kwezinsolo eziyimilutha nabangewona imilutha. Esikhundleni salokho, ucwaningo lukhombise ukuthi imilutha ezichaze ngokwayo ikhombise i-P300 spike ekuphenduleni "into" yabo yokulutha (izithombe zocansi) abazichazayo, njengemilutha ye-cocaine ekhombisa i-P300 spike lapho ihanjiswa nge-cocaine, izidakwa zikhombisa i-P300 spike lapho eyethulwe ngotshwala, njll.
Ngokuqondene nokuthi yikuphi ukuhlobana phakathi kwe-P300 amplitude nezinye izikolo ezibonisa, okuwukuphela kokuhlobana okuphawulekayo kwaba ukuhlangana * okungekuhle * nesifiso sobulili nomlingani wakho. Ngamanye amagama, lapho impendulo yobuchopho iqina emfanekisweni wezocansi, * kancane * isifiso somuntu sokuya ocansini nomuntu wangempela. Lokhu kuzwakala kimi kufana nephrofayili yomuntu othembeke kakhulu ezithombeni onenkinga yokuxhumana ngokocansi nabantu empilweni yangempela. Ngingasho ukuthi lo muntu unenkinga. Ukuthi sifuna ukubiza le nkinga ngokuthi "umlutha" kusengaphikiswana ngakho. Kepha angiboni ukuthi lokhu kutholakala kukhombisa kanjani ukungabi khona komlutha kulesi sampula.
Olwazini lwami, ukuthunyelwe kwami akuqukethe izixhumanisi ukuya kuma-random okungahleliwe ezama ukuthengisa amabhuku. Isayithi le-Porn Study Critiques liqukethe iminikelo yabantu abaningi abanesithakazelo kule mpikiswano, futhi ngimeme abafundi ukuba bazigwele ngokwabo ukuthi yiziphi izingxabano ezingase zifanele. Angizange ngibone noma yiziphi izikhangisi zencwadi kuleyo sayithi.
Kulungile, ngizoba njalo {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/565897#comment-565897}
Kuthunyelwe ngu-Anonymous on Novemba 3, 2013 - 8: 37pm
Kulungile, ngizoba nethemba futhi ngingacabangi ukuthi umbhali walokhu okuthunyelwe kwe-PT noma abalobi bendatshana yocwaningo abakhethi ngenhloso. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, lolo shintsho (izithombe zocansi ezinoshintsho oluphakeme kakhulu) engingazilinganisela ukuthi ziphindaphindwe okungenani ngamalebhu ayi-100 asezilawulweni. Kuzinzile ngokweqile. Futhi, izilawuli zingabantu abasezingeni eliphansi / abangekho ekwakhiweni kwenzalo. Ukuhlehla (hhayi ukuhlangana) okwenziwe, kungacutshungulwa ngokungabi nendawo ephansi emelwe kahle, kepha uhla lokwakhiwa kubonakala lumelwe. Ekugcineni, asazi ukuthi isilawuli asiqoqwanga. Isayensi ihamba kancane. Kungaba kuza ngaphambi kokuthi ulahle usosayensi ngaphandle nge-biohazard (ha!)
Lokho kusho ukuthi kunemibuzo eminingi lolu cwaningo luphakamisa:
I-1. Umuntu ozobhekana nezinye izinkinga zobulili angaphendula kanjani?
I-2. Yini ezoshintsha ngezindlela ezahlukene zezithombe?
I-3. Kuthiwani ngamafilimu?Umbuzo omkhulu, nokho, uthi… kungani kuthathe isikhathi eside kangaka ukwenza isifundo esinjengalesi senziwe kwasekuqaleni? Ngempela, bobabili isixuku se-pro ne-con kufanele siphoxwe yizinga elibi lesayensi kule ndawo.
Kunososayensi bangempela ababhuloga ngalesi sihloko uma udinga izixhumanisi ezingcono. Le blogger ebonakala ingenazo iziqinisekiso futhi yenza amaphutha amaningi "ekubukezeni" kwabo. Ngizokunika ngisho nezixhumanisi zesayensi yokulutha umlutha. I-PT akufanele ithembele kuzibuyekezo ezinjengalezo. Mhlawumbe bekuhloselwe ukuba kube ukuphawula kokukhetha ukuthi umbhali we-PT ukhethe kuphela isixhumanisi sokulutha umlutha kuphela kubhulogi ongeyena usosayensi?
Ukuqiniseka kwakho ngami kuyadingeka {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/556243#comment-556243}
Kuthunyelwe ngu- UJohn A. Johnson Ph.D. on November 3, 2013 - 9:50 pm
Ngingase ngibe necala kule ndaba, kodwa uma ngikwenza, angibazi, futhi ngokuqinisekile angizange ngizame ngenhloso yokuphikisa ingxabano ngandlela-thile. Ngakho-ke ulungile ukucabanga ukuthi noma yikuphi ukukhathazeka ekubhaliseni kwami akuhlosile. Kungakhathaliseki ukuthi abalobi besifundo bahloswe ngenhloso, angikwazi ukusho. Ngiyazisola ukuthi bafuna ukutadisha kwabo ukukhombisa ukuthi izimpendulo ze-neural zezidakamizwa ezithandwayo zobulili azifani neze nezimpendulo zabangewona umlutha ukuze zihloniphe umqondo wokulutha kocansi. Ngokuqinisekile bezimisele ukubika emithonjeni ethandwayo ukuthi isifundo sabo senza ukungabaza okukhulu ngomqondo wokulutha kocansi. Kodwa-ke ngaphandle kweqembu lokulawulwa labangewona umlutha ukukhombisa ukuthi izimpendulo ze-neural phakathi kwamaqembu amabili azicacile, isimangalo sokudalula umqondo wokulutha ubulili kusengaphambili.
Uthi asazi ukuthi iqembu elilawulayo laliqhutshwa yini. Ukuphendula lo mbuzo kwisithangami sesayensi, abacwaningi bathi abanalo iqembu elilawulayo ngoba alikho elidingekayo, ukuthi izifundo zabo zisebenza njengabazilawulayo ekwakhiweni kwezifundo zabo ngaphakathi. Ngithole leyo mpendulo ingaqondakali ngoba okuwukuphela kokuqhathanisa okwenziwe nokwakheka kwabo ngaphakathi kwezihloko bekuyizimpendulo ze-P300 ezinhlotsheni ezahlukahlukene zesikhuthazo sezithombe. Lokhu kukhombisile ukuthi i-P300 spike ibiphezulu ngezithombe ezithinta inkanuko ephakeme kunezinye izithombe. Kepha ukuthi ubukhulu besihlobo bufana noma buhlukile yini kokuzichaza okungewona imilutha, asazi. Uma kunokutholakele okuvela kumakhulu ama-laboratories kule, ababhali bebengakwenza lokho kuqhathanisa. Kepha abenzanga kanjalo.
Uma abacwaningi bezibandakanya ukuzichazela okungewona umlutha ekutadisheni kwabo, ukulungiswa kwezibalo eziphawulekayo phakathi kokuphakama kwe-P300 nesifiso sobulili nomlingani kwakungaba namandla nakakhulu kune-coefficient ababikile. Ukuhlanganiswa abakutholile cishe kunciphise ngenxa yokunciphisa ububanzi obunamaphesenti angu-P300. Ngakho-ke bazikhandla ngokungafaki isampula ehlukene kakhulu ehlanganisa nabantu abangazange babike izinkinga ezilawula ukubuka kwabo kwe-inthanethi ye-eerotica.
Ngisebenzisa ukuhlehla kwemigomo nokuhlobanisa ngokungafani. Noma ngabe umuntu wenza ukuhlehliswa okulula kwe-bivariate noma enye yezindlela zokuhlehla okuningi, konke kunguhlobo lwemodeli ejwayelekile ejwayelekile. Sifinyeza ukulingana kokulingana kwePearson ngohlamvu oluncane r, olumele ukuhlehla. Masingalandelwa eceleni kokungahambelani.
Ngoba anginasabelo empikiswaneni yokulutha ngokocansi, angifuni ukukhetha kuphela kulesi sifundo sokucwaninga ngokulutha hhayi abagxeki be-pro-addiction besifundo. Ibhulogi engixhumanise kuyo iqukethe izibuyekezo ngokuqinisekile ezenzelwe uhlangothi lwazo, noma futhi angifuni ukuqagela ukuthi lokho kukhetha kuhlose noma cha. Ngacelwa ngumbhali wokunye kokubuyekezwa okukulesi siza ukuthi ngibheke ukuhlaziywa kwakhe ngaphambi kokuthi kushicilelwe, ngakho ngenza kanjalo, ngachaza lokho engangicabanga ukuthi kulungile futhi akulungile ekuhlolweni. Ulandele ezinye, kepha hhayi zonke, iziphakamiso zami zokubuyekeza ukuhlaziya kwakhe. Ngakho-ke, yebo, kunamaphutha ekubuyekezweni ngoba akuzona zonke iziphakamiso zami ezalandelwa. Ngikhombe kule bhulogi njengendawo yokuqala yezinkinga eziphikisanayo. Uma unganikeza izixhumanisi kumazwana asezingeni eliphakeme (kungaba umlutha noma umlutha), lokho kungaba insizakalo enhle kulabo abalaleli abanentshisekelo kumqondo wokulutha ngokocansi.
Njengoba ngishilo, intshisekelo yami enkulu isezintweni ezingokwengqondo ezithinta ukwenziwa nokuchazwa kocwaningo lwesayensi, ngaphezu komqondo wokulutha ngokocansi ngasese. Mhlawumbe bekulula kimi ukukhomba isiza somuntu okholelwa ngokweqiniso embonweni wokulutha ngokocansi ukukhombisa izici ezingaba khona ezingokwengqondo ezithinta ukutolikwa kocwaningo kunesayithi eliqinile, elingathathi hlangothi eligcinwe ngabaphenyi bezocansi abaqeqeshiwe. Uma kunesiza okusolwa ukuthi asikhethi (i-pro- noma i-anti-drug), ngingathanda ukuthola i-URL ukuze ngizibonele ukuthi ngabe ayikhethi yini. Ukuthola ingxoxo engachemile yokulutha ngokocansi kungaba okokuqala kimi.
I-Craptastic {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/566091#comment-566091}
Ihanjiswe nguJen on November 4, 2013 - 4:02 pm
Ngempela. Kuzwakala kimi njengomlobi mhlawumbe kwakufanele ukuba ukhokhele kakhulu impendulo yakho, ngaphambi kokushicilela.
Inzondo ukukhomba okusobala kabuhlungu lapha, buuuut, kungashiwo ngokuphepha ukuthi uma impikiswano enkulu ezungeze ukushicilelwa komuntu iyiqiniso, kunokuqukethwe, kunenkinga ethile.
Inkinga ye-psychology yonke {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/566277#comment-566277}
Kuthunyelwe ngu- UJohn A. Johnson Ph.D. on November 5, 2013 - 11:14 am
Yebo, uma inkinga ingacacile, kufanele ibe. Le nkinga ayiyona eyingqayizivele, kulesi sihloko esithile. Iqhubekela phambili enkolweni yezemfundo.
Izazi zokusebenza kwengqondo zithola ukuqeqeshwa okuningi ekucabangeni okubucayi, engisho ukuthi ngifuna amaphutha ezifundweni zocwaningo nokwenza imiphumela ehlukile yokuchazwa kwemiphumela, ukuthi iningi lethu lithuthukise i-hypertrophy yomsebenzi wethu obucayi kanye ne-atrophy yomsebenzi wethu owakhayo, wokudala. Izazi zokusebenza kwengqondo zizokhetha unomphela amaphutha endleleni yezifundo ezingakusekeli okuqukethwe asevele ekukholelwa. Lokhu kuyinkomba yenkinga ngokuqondiswa kwengqondo yonke. Alukho ucwaningo oluphelele ngokwendlela, ngisho nezifundo ezishicilelwe ezibuyekezwe ngokuphelele. Kuyinto eyodwa ukukwazi ukuthola amaphutha ezifundweni afinyelela iziphetho ongazithandi; kungenye yokuklama nokwenza isifundo okhiqiza ukwesekwa okungaqondakali kombono ohlukile.
Eh, hhayi ukuphazamiseka {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/566638#comment-566638}
Kuthunyelwe ngu-Anonymous on November 6, 2013 - 6:58 pm
Eh, hhayi ukuphazanyiswa kepha "Sifinyeza inani lokuhlangana kwePearson ngohlamvu oluncane r, olumele ukuhlehla" nakanjani cha. Ukuhlukumezeka kuthola iphutha ngokuhlukile kunokulungiswa. Ungasho kalula ukuthi ngubani empeleni ofunde isifundo esibuyekeziwe… uma bethi "ukuhlangana" bebengazi ukuthi yini eyenziwe ngezibalo (umfana kusixhumanisi sakho wenza iphutha elifanayo). Ungabi yilowomuntu!
Noma kunjalo, angitholanga ithoni lama-blogger esayensi akhuluma ngale nkinga, kepha kube nokubuyekezwa okuhle kakhulu, okulinganiselayo ongakukhomba:
Okunye i-Blogger ye-PT ne-guy's addictive guy:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/addiction-in-society/201307/the-apocryphal-debate-about-sex-addictionKusukela kumuntu oyinhloko uzama ukuthola ukucansi kobulili kwi-DSM:
https://web.archive.org/web/20160313043414/http://rory.net/pages/prausecritque.htmlUmfana oshicilela ekulutha umlutha, nakuba kungenalo ngalolu cwaningo:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150128192512/http://www.sexologytoday.org/2012/03/steve-mcqueens-shame-valid-portrayal-of.htmlNgokuqinisekile ushaya i-massage Therapist engahleliwe e-Oregon ngekhono labo lokuhlaziya ngokulinganayo. Angihambisani nakho konke lokhu noma kunjalo, kepha lelo iphuzu. Lokhu okungenani kugqamisa okuhle nokubi, kanti ukuhlaziywa okukhonjiwe empeleni kungamanga (isb. Ababhali beSNP baqoqa futhi babika isikali sonke se-SDI). Kuhlala kungcono njalo ukungakhuthazi imininingwane yamanga ngokungathi shu!
Ukucaphuna ekutadisheni {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/566673#comment-566673}
Kuthunyelwe ngu- UJohn A. Johnson Ph.D. on November 6, 2013 - 10:29 pm
Ake ngicaphune ekutadisheni, engangikufunde ngaphambi kokubhala okuthunyelwe kwami. Kusuka ku-http: //www.socioaffectiveneuroscipsychol.net/index.php/snp/article/view/20770/28995:
“Ukuhlangana kukaPearson kubalwe phakathi kwama-amplitudes asetshenzisiwe alinganiswa ewindini le-P300 kanye nedatha yemibuzo yokuzibika. Okuwukuphela kokuqondanisa okufinyelela ekubalulekeni kwaba yisikolo somehluko esibalwa phakathi kwezimo ezingathathi hlangothi nezimnandi – zocansi ewindini le-P300 ngesifiso sobulili nesilinganiso sozakwethu, r (52) = - 0.332, p = 0.016. ”
Yebo, abacwaningi baphinde bahlaziya ngokuphindaphindiwe okuningi, kepha ungabona kusuka kumcaphuno ngenhla ukuthi babhalise ama-coefficients e-Pearson.
Ngaphezu kwalokho, ngigcina ukuthi ukuhlehla nokulungiswa akuzona izinto ezimbili ezihlukile. Ngiyazi ukuthi abanye abantu bathi ukulingana kokulingana, r, “kumane” kuyinkomba yokulinganisa yamandla obudlelwano obuqondile phakathi kuka-x no-y, kanti ukubuyela emuva kubhekisela ekulinganiseni u-x noma y ngokomugqa ofaneleka kakhulu , kungaba y '= bx + a noma x' = ngo + a. Kepha uma sibuyela emuva ku-x, inani elilungile le-slope, b, ngu-r * Sy / Sx. Thatha noma iyiphi incwadi ngezibalo zengqondo (isb., UQuinn McNemar) bese ufunda ingxoxo yayo yokulungiswa nokubuyela emuva.
Siyabonga ngokungeza izinkomba ezingeziwe. Ngangijwayele isikhundla sikaPeele (uStanton Peele ungungoti osemthethweni ngalesi sihloko), futhi ngangisifundile isiqeshana sikaRory Reid, kepha hhayi okuthunyelwe nguJames Cantor (yize ngijwayelene futhi ngiyakuhlonipha ukucabanga kwakhe). Lezi zinkomba ezengeziwe ziyisevisi kulabo abafuna imininingwane engaphezulu.
Ihlaziya okungaqondakali futhi {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/566683#comment-566683}
Kuthunyelwe ngu-Anonymous on November 6, 2013 - 11:15 pm
"Ukuhlola ngqo ubudlelwano phakathi kokwehluka kwesimo se-amplitude ku-P300, kubalwe ukwehla kwezinyathelo ezimbili."
Ngivame ukuba ngumxhumanisi wezibalo, futhi uyaziphoxa. Isikhathi samaphutha sehlukile phakathi kokuhlehla nokulungiswa… empeleni, “yizinto ezimbili ezihlukene”. Uqashwa kanjani emhlabeni ngokwengqondo? Okungenani hlala kude nabafundi bami!
Angiqiniseki ukuthi kungani wena {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/566750#comment-566750}
Kuthunyelwe ngu- UJohn A. Johnson Ph.D. on November 7, 2013 - 9:32 am
Angiqiniseki ukuthi kungani unikeze isaphulelo ocwaningweni, “kubalwe ukuhlehla okuyizinyathelo ezimbili,” lapho sengivele ngiyavuma ukuthi ukuhlaziya kwabaphenyi kufaka phakathi ukuhlehla okuningi kanye nokubalwa kokuhlangana kwePearson.
Njengoba ngishilo, "Yebo, abacwaningi baphinde bahlaziya kaninginingi, kepha ungabona kulesi sicaphuno esingenhla ukuthi babala ama-coefficients we-Pearson."
Isizathu sokuthi ngikhiphe isicaphuni, “Ukubalwa kukaPearson kwabalwa. . . ”Kungenxa yokuthi ubusikisela ukuthi mina nomgxeki asisifundanga isifundo. Uthe, “Ungasho kalula ukuthi ngubani ngempela ofunde isifundo esibuyekeziwe… uma bethi 'ukuhlangana' bebengazi ukuthi kwenziwa ini ngokwezibalo (umuntu oxhumene nawe wenze iphutha elifanayo).”
Uma ufuna ukugcina ukuthi ukulungiswa nokulungiswa kukhona izinto ezimbili ezihlukene, yiba yisimenywa sami. Anginazi ukuthi ngubani abafundi bakho ngoba awuziwa. Ngisho noma ngabe ngikwenzile, angizange ngibakhathaze. Anginamahloni ngomsebenzi wami njengengcweti yengqondo; Ngiyethemba ukuthi uthola umsebenzi wakho ukwanelisa.
;