"I-neuroscience ye-Inthanethi ye-Pornography Umlutha: Ukubuyekezwa nokubuyekeza" - Ukucaphuna ngokucacile Steele et al., 2013

Xhumanisa nephepha loqobo - "I-Neuroscience Yokulutha Kwezithombe Zobulili Ezingcolile ze-Intanethi: Ukubuyekezwa Nokuvuselelwa" (2015)

Qaphela - amanye amaphepha amaningi abuyekezwa ngontanga avuma ukuthi uSteele et al., 2013 isekela imodeli yokulutha kabi kocansi: Izibukezo ezibuyekezwa kontanga Steele et al., 2013

Ukucacisa okucacile Steele et al., 2013 (citation 303):


Ucwaningo lwe-EEG kulabo abakhononda ngezinkinga eziqondisa ukubuka kwabo kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-intanethi kubike ukubuyiswa kwe-neural kwisenzo socansi [303]. Ucwaningo lwenzelwe ukuhlola ubuhlobo phakathi kwe-ERP amplitudes uma ubuka izithombe ezingokomzwelo nezomzimba kanye nezinyathelo zombuzo wobulili obucansi kanye nesifiso socansi. Abalobi baphetha ngokuthi ukungabikho kwemibono ephakathi kwamanani e-questionnaires e-hypersexual futhi kusho ama-amplitudes angu-P300 uma ubuka izithombe zobulili "ukwehluleka ukuhlinzeka ngokusekelwa kwama-hypersexual pathological" [303] (i-10). Kodwa-ke, ukungabi khona kwemibono kungachazwa kangcono yiziphambeko eziphikisanayo endleleni. Isibonelo, lolu cwaningo lusetshenziselwa izidakamizwa eziphathekayo (abesilisa nabesifazane, kuhlanganise no-7 abangewona abesilisa nabesifazane). Ucwaningo lwe-Cue-reactivity ngokuqhathanisa ukuphendula komqondo kwezidakamizwa ekulawuleni okunempilo kudinga izifundo ezizimele (ubulili obufanayo, ubudala obufanayo) ukuze kube nemiphumela evumelekile. Ngokucacile ekufundiseni izidakamizwa ze-porn, kusungulwe kahle ukuthi abesilisa nabesifazane bahluke ngokujulile ebuchosheni nasezimpindeni ezizimele ezifanisayo zobulili ezibukwayo [304, 305, 306]. Ukwengeza, imibuzo emibili yokuhlola ayiqinisekisiwe kubasebenzisi abasebenzisa i-IP abanomlutha, futhi izihloko azange zihlolwe ezinye izibonakaliso zokudakwa noma ukukhathazeka kwemizwa.

Ngaphezu kwalokho, isiphetho esichazwe ku-abstract, "Impikiswano yokuqonda ubulili obufanayo njengesifiso esikhulu, kunokukhathazeka, kuxoxwa" [303] (iphe. 1) kubonakala kungekho lapho kucatshangelwa ukuthi isifundo sithola ukuthi ukuphakama kwe-P300 kwakungavumelani kabi nesifiso sobulili nomlingani. Njengoba kuchaziwe ku-Hilton (2014), lokhu okuthola "ngokuphambene ngokuqondile nokuchazwa kwe-P300 njengesifiso esiphakeme" [307]. Ukuhlaziywa kukaHilton kuveza ukuthi ukungabikho kweqembu lokulawulwa nokuhluleka kobuchwepheshe be-EEG ukubandlulula phakathi "nesifiso sobulili obuphezulu" nokuthi "ukuphoqeleka ngokobulili" kwenza uSteele et al. okutholakele okungenakuqondakala [307].

Okokugcina, ukutholakala okuphawulekayo kwephepha (ukuphakama okuphezulu kwe-P300 ezithombeni zobulili, ngokuphathelene nezithombe ezingathathi hlangothi) kunikezwa ukunakwa okuncane engxenyeni yengxoxo. Lokhu kungalindelekile, njengoba ukutholakala okuvamile ngezidakamizwa nezidakamizwa ze-intanethi ukuphakama kwe-P300 okuhlobene nokungahambisani nokungathathi hlangothi lapho kuvezwa emibonweni ebonakalayo ehambisana nokulutha kwayo [308]. Eqinisweni, Voon, et al. [262] banikeze ingxenye yengxoxo yabo ehlaziya lokhu okutholwe ukufundwa kwe-P300. Voon et al. uma kunikezwa incazelo yokubaluleka kwe-P300 enganikezwa ephepheni le-Steele, ikakhulukazi ngokuqondene namamodeli wokulutha, okuphetha,

"Ngakho-ke, kokubili umsebenzi we-DACC ocwaningweni lwe-CSB wamanje nomsebenzi we-P300 abike ekutadisheni kwe-CSB yangaphambilini[303] kungabonakalisa izinqubo ezifanayo zokuqala zokubamba. Ngokufanayo, kokubili izifundo zibonisa ukuhlangana phakathi kwalezi zinyathelo ngesifiso esithuthukisiwe. Lapha siphakamisa ukuthi umsebenzi we-DACC uqhathaniswa nesifiso, okungase kubonise inkomba yokulangazelela, kodwa akuhambisani nokuthanda okusikisela ekutheni umthamo wokulutha ukhuthaze. "[262] (iphe. 7)

Ngakho ngenkathi laba babhali [303] bathi inhlolovo yabo inqatshelwe ukusetshenziswa kwesimiso sokulutha ku-CSB, Voon et al. kwafakazela ukuthi laba abalobi banikeze ubufakazi obusekela lo mfanekiso.