Opin: Wane ne yake karya tsarin kimiyya akan batsa?

Op-ed.PNG

Gabatarwar by YourBrainOnPorn.com

Ba zan iya gaya muku sau nawa aka ambaci "wasiƙa zuwa ga edita" ga jaridar Salt Lake a matsayin "tabbataccen" amfani da batsa ba tare da wata matsala ba kuma jarabar batsa ba ta wanzu ba: Op-ed: Shirin makarantar hana batsa yana ɓatar da kimiyya . Sau da yawa ana buga shi a shafukan sada zumunta (Quora, Twitter, Facebook) a matsayin shaida cewa YBOP, Fight the New Drug ko wasu sun ɓatar da halin da binciken ke ciki a yanzu ko kuma sun yi kuskuren ambaton bincike. A zahiri ya bayyana daidai yayin da abokan marubuciya 7 na PhD Nicole Prause suka sanya hannu a kai.

Duk da haka, a kusa da jarrabawa muna gano cewa :.

  1. Ba ya ba da misalai na ɓata gari ta “Yaƙin Sabon Maganin”, ko wani dabam.75
  2. Babu wani ikirarin da aka ambata.
  3. 8 neuroscientists ya ba da misali binciken bincike neuroscience.
  4. Babu wani daga cikin masu bincike da ya taba wallafa wani binciken da ya shafi an tabbatar da "cin zarafin batsa."
  5. Wasu da suka sanya hannu kan Op-Ed suna da tarihin haɗari da gaske game da batutuwan jima'i da jima'i (ta haka ne nuna nuna bambanci).
  6. Yawancin sun hada gwiwa tare da jagorar marubucin Op-Ed (Prause) ko abokin aiki (Pfaus).

Wannan kalmar 600-Op-Ed tana cike da maganganun da ba'a tallafasu ba wanda ake nufi don yaudarar jama'a. Ya kasa tallafawa maganganun guda ɗaya kamar yadda yake faɗar takardu 4 kawai - babu ɗayansu da ke da alaƙa da jarabar batsa, tasirin batsa akan dangantaka, ko matsalolin lalata da ke haifar da batsa.

Ni da wasu sauran masana a cikin wannan filin sun ba da hujja da maganganun da suke da shi a cikin ɗan gajeren taƙaice a kasa. Sabanin "masu binciken kwayoyin halitta na Op-Ed," mun gabatar da daruruwan bincike da dubawa na musamman na wallafe-wallafen, ciki har da da yawa daga cikin wadannan:

Ba a iya yin amfani da ikon yin amfani da ƙididdigar binciken da FTND ya gabatar ba wannan sakonnin twitter inda mai amfani SB ya kalubalanci ya yi amfani da shi don bayyanawa da bayyana fassarar FTND da aka yi ba daidai ba. Kuna kunne ba shi da amsar:

YBOP tana jira a kan 5 shekaru don yin amfani da shi don yin la'akari da binciken da FTND yayi kuskure. Duk da haka jiran.

A ƙarshe, mai karatu ya kamata ya san cewa Prause shi ne tsohon malami tare da dogon tarihi na masu wallafawa, masu bincike, masu tursasawa, manema labaru da sauran wadanda ba su iya bayar da shaida game da tashe-tashen hankulan yanar gizo ba. Ta bayyana ya kasance jin dadi sosai tare da kamfanonin batsa, kamar yadda za a iya gani daga wannan Hoton ta (nesa dama) a kan karar launi na Ƙungiyar Masu Rauni na XRCO (X-Rated Critics Organization). (A cewar Wikipedia the XRCO Awards an ba da Amurka Ƙungiyar Ƙungiyar X-Rated a kowace shekara ga mutanen da ke aiki a nishaɗi na yara da kuma kawai ita ce kyaututtukan albashi na matasa wanda aka nuna kawai don 'yan kasuwa.[1]). Har ila yau yana nuna cewa Fuskantarwa na iya samun samu masu yin wasan kwaikwayo a matsayin batutuwa ta hanyar wani kamfanonin kamfanonin kamfanoni na kamfanoni, da Jagorar Magana Ta Musamman. An yi zargin anyi amfani da abubuwan FSC da aka samu a cikin ta karatu-bindiga a kan dauke da ƙafa da kuma kasuwanci ne mai “Orgasmic tunani” makirci (yanzu kasancewa FBI ta bincika ta). Addu'a ta kuma yi ba da sanarwa ba game da sakamakon bincikenta da ita nazarin hanyoyin. Domin yawancin takardun, duba: Shin Nicole Farko ya shawo kan masana'antar Porn? 

Sabuntawa (Afrilu, 2019): A yunƙurin dakatar da sukar YBOP, wasu ƴan tsirarun da suka kira kansu ƙwararru sun kafa ƙungiya don satar alamar kasuwancin YBOP. Ba abin mamaki ba ne, ƙungiyar Nicole Prause ce ke jagorantar ta kuma ta haɗa da wasu marubuta 3 na wannan edita: Janniko Georgiadis, Erick Janssen, da James Cantor . Duba wannan shafin don ƙarin bayani: Keta Alamar Ciniki Mai Wuya da Masu Kare Talla ta Batsa ke Yi (www.realyourbrainonporn.com) . Idan kuna neman nazarin wani bincike wanda ba za ku iya duba wannan shafin ba a cikin sharhin da ke ƙasa: Ƙungiyar 'Yan Sanda ta Kimiyyar Batsa (AKA: "RealYourBrainOnPorn.com" da "PornographyResearch.com") . Tana bincika "shafin bincike na masu keta alamar kasuwanci," gami da nazarin da aka zaɓa daga waje, son zuciya, rashin kulawa mai girma, da yaudara.

Opin: Wane ne yake karya tsarin kimiyya akan batsa?

8 neuroscientists sun kasa gabatar da wani binciken neuro guda daya don tallafawa da'awarsu

By Clay Olsen, Gail Dines, Mary Anne Layden, Gary Wilson, Jill Manning, Donald Hilton da John Foubert

Zarge-zargen ɓata sunan kimiyya suna da matuƙar muhimmanci. Mun rubuta ne don mayar da martani ga sukar da aka yi kwanan nan kan ikirarin kimiyya na Fight the New Drug . Maimakon kawai "masu fafutuka" kamar yadda marubutan suka yi mana lakabi da "Fight the New Drug", muna wakiltar kimanin shekaru 130 na ƙwarewar ƙwararru a bincike ko taimaka wa waɗanda batsa ta shafa.

Yayin da mawallafa na farko sun fahimci "wasu dalilai na damuwa" game da amfani da batsa, kusan rabin abin da suke sharhi ya nuna "tasirin tasiri na jima'i da amfani," yayin da ya rage mummunar cutar. Wannan irin "hangen nesa," suna jayayya, FTND ya kasa fahimtar aikin da suke a makarantu.

Da suka ambaci wani bincike guda ɗaya kawai, jerin fa'idodin da suka bayar game da batsa ya kama daga "ƙarfafa jima'i," zuwa "farin ciki da farin ciki" da kuma "inganta jin daɗin mutum da bayyanarsa." Dangane da ambato ɗaya, an nemi mu yi imani da cewa samar da batsa yana haɓaka "girman kai" ga masu yin wasan kwaikwayo yayin da shan sa "yana rage tashin hankali da cin zarafin jima'i" - wannan, ba tare da ambaton ko dai bincike shida da ke tabbatar da matsalolin lafiyar kwakwalwa da ta jiki na mata masu yin wasan kwaikwayo ko kuma cikakken nazarin 50 da aka yi nazari a kansu wanda ke haɗa amfani da batsa kai tsaye da cin zarafin jima'i.

Marubutan sun yi ikirarin cewa wani bincike na kimiyya mafi inganci ya tabbatar da cewa "ƙaramin kashi na waɗanda suka kalli fina-finan jima'i" ne kawai ke da mummunan tasiri - suna ambaton "ƙasa da kashi 2 cikin ɗari na maza, ƙasa da kashi 0.05 cikin ɗari na mata." Suna yin hakan ba tare da ambato ba, kuma ba tare da ambaton ko dai binciken Amurka na 2016 wanda kashi 28% na masu amfani da batsa suka zira kwallaye a (ko sama da haka) don yiwuwar rashin lafiyar jima'i, ko kuma binciken Belgium na 2016 inda kashi 28% na masu amfani da batsa suka kimanta shan batsa a matsayin matsala (yawan farashi mai ban tsoro, ganin cewa masu amfani da abubuwan da ke haifar da jaraba galibi suna cikin waɗanda suka ƙarshe suka gane suna da matsaloli). Duk da haka, marubutan op-ed sun ci gaba da jayayya cewa batsa "ba ta da mummunan tasiri" kuma maimakon haka "yawancin sakamako masu kyau."

An yi nazari kan nazarin batsa guda 75 da aka yi nazari a kansu - wanda ya fi yawa daga cikin shaidun da aka samu zuwa yanzu - wanda ke danganta amfani da batsa da rage dangantaka ko gamsuwar jima'i (eh, yawancin tasirin da aka bincika suma). Haka kuma an yi watsi da nazarin 30 da ke danganta shan batsa da matsalolin jima'i da ƙarancin sha'awa, nazarin 55 da ke nuna ƙaruwar batsa ko al'ada da kuma cikakken bita na kimiyya guda 20 waɗanda ke kafa manyan haɗari tare da amfani da batsa.

Irin wannan bincike, wa] annan marubuta sun yi jayayya, ya kamata a watsar da shi a cikin kimar "mafi daidaita". Ya bambanta, waɗanda basu yarda da bincike na rosy ba, suna cikin kalmominsu, kawai sun "watsi da hanyar kimiyya" ko sun kasa gudanar da bincike na "rigorous".

Shin hakan zai shafi nazarin ilimin jijiyoyi guda 41 da aka buga yanzu daga jami'o'i kamar Cambridge, Yale da Max Planck waɗanda ke bincika alamu a cikin kwakwalwar masu amfani da batsa akai-akai? Kusan kowace nazarin ilimin jijiyoyi ya gano canje-canjen kwakwalwa sun yi daidai da jaraba , gami da nazarin 28 da ke nuna tasirin hankali ko amsawar ji, yin rikodin da'irori na gaba-gaba masu rauni da kuma yin rikodin dakatar da jijiyoyi guda takwas.

Yadda masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi takwas za su iya yin watsi da waɗannan nazarin yana da wuyar fahimta, musamman lokacin da masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi sama da sittin suka kammala da cewa bayanan kwakwalwarsu suna goyon bayan yuwuwar jarabar batsa. Hakika, ƙungiyar guda ɗaya da ke fassara bayanansu daga kwakwalwar masu amfani da batsa ita ce wadda babban marubucin op-ed ya jagoranta. Lokacin da bita goma daga waje suka buga sake nazarin waɗannan bayanan, sun kammala da cewa ƙungiyar tana yin watsi da shaidar halaye da rashin jin daɗin da ke nuna duk halayen jaraba. Sabanin ikirarin babban marubucin cewa binciken ƙungiyarta na rashin hankali ya "kawar da jarabar batsa" ta hanyar da ba ta dace ba, shaidar da ke cikin wannan binciken ba ta tsaya ba.

Duk da haka, waɗannan marubutan suna jayayya cewa ainihin cutarwa ga jama'a ba ta samo asali ne daga amfani da batsa ba, amma daga dagewa a bainar jama'a cewa yana iya zama cutarwa! Sun dage cewa raba saƙo game da illolin batsa ga matasa shine ainihin haɗarin—roƙon hukumomin makaranta da su tabbatar da cewa matasa sun ji ra'ayi "daidaitacce" wanda kuma ya yarda da tasirin "kyakkyawan" batsa.

Ganin yadda shawarwarin marubutan suka yi fice sosai tare da yawan shaidun da ke nuna illolin da ke tattare da shan batsa, ya zama dole mu yi tambaya: Su waye masu fafutuka a nan? Kuma, wa za a yi amfani da sha'awarsu ta hanyar isar da ƙarshen waɗannan marubutan ga 'ya'yanmu?

Dangane da tasirin zamantakewa, motsin rai, fahimta, jima'i da ci gaba da aka rubuta a kan matasa, muna ba da shawarar cewa lokaci ya yi da za a samar da wata hanya mai ƙarfi, wadda aka tabbatar da ingancinta don ilmantar da matasa daga illolin batsa. Yaranmu sun cancanci aƙalla hakan.

[Don amsoshin ƙarin ƙarin da'awar da aka yi a cikin wannan opsala, duba ƙasa]

Clay Olsen shi ne Shugaba da kuma co-kafa yaki da sababbin kwayoyi, da kuma wanda ya kafa, jagoran jagoranci da kuma darektan wasan kwaikwayo na Ƙarfafawa, ƙungiyar tallafin ilimi don waɗanda ke fuskantar matsalolin batsa.

Gail Dines, Ph.D. shi farfesa ne na ilimin zamantakewa da nazarin mata a Kolejin Wheelock a Boston, da kuma kafa shugaban Al'adu Reframed, wani ginin cibiyar kiwon lafiyar jama'a da kuma juriya a cikin matasa zuwa al'ada.

Mary Anne Layden, Ph D, ita ce Daraktan Cibiyar Harkokin Jima'i da Harkokin Kiwon Lafiyar Jama'a da kuma Cibiyar Nazarin Kwarewa a Ma'aikatar Kimiyya a Jami'ar Pennsylvania

Gary Wilson shine wanda ya ƙirƙiri YourBrainOnPorn.com kuma marubucin "Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa: Batsa ta Intanet da Kimiyyar Fitowa ta Addiction."

Jill Manning, Ph.D. ne mai auren lasisi da kuma mai ilimin likitancin iyali, mai bincike da kuma marubucin da ke zaune a Colorado. Ta halin yanzu tana aiki a kwamitin gudanarwa na Enough is Enough, kungiyar da ba ta riba ba ta sadaukar da kai don samar da Intanet mafi aminci ga yara da iyalai.

Donald Hilton, MD, wani masanin farfesa ne mai kula da cutar ne a Jami'ar Kimiyyar Lafiya na Jami'ar Texas a San Antonio da kuma ɗan'uwan Amurka na Ma'aikata na Neurological.

John D. Foubert, Ph.D., mashahurin Farfesa na Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kwalejin Kasa ta Oklahoma kuma shine marubucin sabon littafi, Ta yaya Hotunan Hotuna suke Harbancewa: Abin da Yaraya, Matasan Matasa, Iyaye da Fasto Sun Bukata Sanin.

Addendum: Ƙarin karin bayani guda bakwai:

1. Falsafar kimiyya. Bayan sun yi jayayya cewa FTND tana " ɓarna kimiyya a tsarin da ba ta dace ba" kuma tana "rashin kula da hanyar kimiyya ," marubutan sun shafe dogon sakin layi suna tafiya cikin ƙa'idodin da suka yi iƙirarin an karya su, wato:

" Hanyar kimiyya tana buƙatar ƙirƙirar hasashe mai ƙarya, sannan ƙirƙirar gwaje-gwaje don ƙaryata wannan hasashe. Sai dai idan bayanai suka gaza karyata hasashe akai-akai za a iya yanke hukuncin cewa hasashe yana da goyon baya, ba a tabbatar da shi ba. "

Samu shi! Kuma dama akan. Muna bin ku har yanzu…

Sun ci gaba da cewa, " Wasikar FTND ta nuna cewa (a) an yi gwaje-gwaje masu tsauri don ƙaryata hasashen cewa batsa tana da jaraba ko cutarwa "

Yep. Akwai!

" (b) wannan gwajin ya gaza tabbatar da wannan hasashe akai-akai "

Yep. Yana da!

" kuma (c) ba a sami wata shaida mai karo da juna ba ."

Ba duka abu ba. Nope!

Abin takaici ne dalilin da yasa likitoci takwas zasu damu da jagorancin wannan hujja akan shaidar da ke nunawa.

2. Wakiltar nazari. Marubutan Op-Ed sun ce, " Ba a ɗauki samfurin masu amfani da fina-finan jima'i ta kowace hanya ba, kuma binciken ya ƙare da samfuran son zuciya da ke nuna damuwa game da amfani da fina-finan jima'i ."

A gaskiya ma, jerinmu na nazarin 75 da ke danganta amfani da batsa tare da gamsuwar jima'i ko dangantaka yana da binciken da ya samo asali daga wannan batun gamsuwa ta hanyar wakilci: duka ɓangarorin giciye da na tsawon lokaci.

3. Harshen jaraba da damuwa. Marubutan sun ce, " ra'ayin cewa ɗabi'a a matsayin 'mai jaraba' ya nuna mummunan lahani ga tunani . "

Duk da haka binciken da suka yi nuni da shi bai tantance illar da ake yi wa mutanen da suka ji cewa halayensu yana da jaraba ba. Haɗin gwiwarsu ya kai ga wani bincike da ya gano cewa maki a gwajin jarabar batsa da ya shafi damuwa ta tunani. A taƙaice dai, ƙarin matakan jarabar batsa sun yi daidai da ƙarin matakan damuwa, wanda za a yi tsammani a cikin masu amfani da matsala. Don cikakken sharhi kan wannan binciken danna nan.

4. Harshen jaraba da rashin aikin jima'i. Marubutan sun ce, " fahimtar ɗabi'a a matsayin 'masu jaraba ' ... ya sa yara maza su yi tunanin suna da matsalar rashin aikin jima'i lokacin da ba sa yin hakan ."

Ƙarya kuma. Haɗin yana zuwa ga takarda mai nazarin shari'o'i guda 4 masu rikitarwa game da samari waɗanda ke da matsalar rashin ƙarfi (ba a yi imani da cewa suna da ED ba kamar yadda marubutan suka yi iƙirari). Babu ambaton amfani da batsa ko jarabar batsa a cikin wannan takarda.

5. Batsa da haƙƙin mata . Sun ce, " Kallon fina-finan jima'i yana da alaƙa da ƙarin daidaito…. "

Binciken da marubutan suka yi nuni da shi ya nuna 'rashin daidaito' a matsayin tallafi ga: Gano mata, Mata masu riƙe da mukamai na iko, Mata masu aiki a waje, da Zubar da ciki. Al'ummar da ba ta da addini sun fi sassaucin ra'ayi, kuma suna da yawan amfani da batsa fiye da na addinai . Wannan gaskiyar tana haifar da alaƙa mai ƙarfi tsakanin amfani da batsa da (abin da wannan binciken ya bayyana a matsayin) "rashin daidaito." A zahiri, akwai sama da bincike 40 da ke danganta amfani da batsa da "ra'ayoyi marasa daidaito" ga mata.

6. Batsa da kuma ilimi/addini mai zurfi. Marubutan sun ce, " Kallon fina-finan jima'i yana da alaƙa da... ilimi mai zurfi, ƙarin addu'a da addini a lokacin da ake amfani da shi sosai, kuma ana amfani da su sosai a fannin maganin jima'i ."

Haɗin da marubutan suka bayar ya shafi alaƙar "rashin daidaito" ne kawai da aka ruwaito ta hanyar wani bincike guda ɗaya - ba sauran iƙirarin marubutan ba. Bugu da ƙari, bincike da yawa sun ba da rahoton sakamako masu karo da juna, gami da nazarin da ke haɗa batsa da ra'ayoyin maza, rashin yarda da ra'ayin mazan jiya da ƙarancin daidaito: 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13.

7. Littattafan Ganewa. Dangane da ICD (Rarraba Cututtuka na Duniya da Matsalolin Lafiya Masu Alaƙa), wanda marubutan suka ambata, muhimmin batu shine cewa ICD-11 mai zuwa ya gabatar da ganewar asali ga "Matsalar Halayyar Jima'i Mai Wuya ," kalmar da aka yarda da ita "ƙarancin kalma" wacce ake kira " jarabar jima'i ."

A bayyane yake cewa fannin likitanci na duniya yana tafiya zuwa ga mafi girman ilimin halittar kwakwalwa da sauran shaidu. Shakku game da ingancin jarabar batsa a matsayin haɗari ga wasu masu amfani yana raguwa da sauri duk da ƙoƙarin da ake yi na yanzu don kawar da ƙura a idanun jama'a. Abin takaici, ICD na Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya "ya fi" Littafin Bincike da Kididdiga (DSM) mai jan ƙafa a matsayin jagorar ganewar asali. ICD ita ce rarrabuwar cututtukan kwakwalwa da aka fi amfani da ita a duk duniya, kuma an wajabta amfani da lambobin ganewar asali a Amurka da sauran wurare ta yarjejeniyar ƙasa da ƙasa maimakon ganewar DSM-5, waɗanda ba su da irin wannan umarni. A ƙarshe, ikirarin cewa amsarmu ta farko ta yi magana game da lambobin bayanin da ke cikin littattafan ganewar asali na yanzu maimakon ganewar asali na kai tsaye ba daidai ba ne, kamar yadda ƙwararren likitan kwakwalwa na DSM Richard Krueger, MD ya bayyana a sarari.