Abun Cutar da Nicole Prause ya yiwa Gary Wilson da sauransu (Shafi 1)

Gabatarwa

Mashawarcin doka ya ba mu shawara don ƙirƙirar waɗannan shafuka, waɗanda ke da rubuce-rubuce game da yaƙin neman zaɓe na Nicole Prause wanda ke nufin waɗanda ke nuna yiwuwar cutar da batsa ko batutuwa a cikin masana'antar batsa. "Sunshine" yana kare al'umma Yi amfani da fitintinu ta hanyar adana hujjoji tare da bawa baƙi da 'yan jarida damar fahimtar gaskiya da kansu. Lallai, waɗannan shafukan an riga an ambata a cikin a karar cin mutunci akan Amincewa:

“Tarihin wanda ake kara ya kasance cikakke kuma ingantacce wanda yake dauke da asusun mutane da dama wadanda abin ya shafa tun daga shekarar 2013 zuwa yanzu, wanda ya kunshi sama da shafuka dubu biyu na takardu da shaidu, ana samu https://bit.ly/32KOa3q. "

Nicole Prause ta shiga cikin tarin da'awar ƙarya, ɓata suna, rahotannin mugunta, cin zarafi da aka yi niyya, ƙararraki marasa tushe, da barazanar ƙararraki. Waɗannan shafukan suna tattara dabarun ɓata sunanta da yawa, kodayake ba a haɗa da wasu abubuwan da suka faru ba saboda waɗanda ake nema suna jin tsoron ƙarin ramuwar gayya daga gare ta ( Shafi na 1 , Shafi na 2 , Shafi na 3 , Shafi na 4 , Shafi na 5, Shafi na 6 ).

Ni (Gary Wilson) wataƙila ni ce abin da ta fi so, amma ta kuma kai hari ga masu bincike, likitoci, masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali, masana halayyar ɗan adam, abokan aikinta tun daga ɗan lokacin da ta yi aiki a UCLA, wata ƙungiyar agaji ta Burtaniya, mazan da ke cikin murmurewa, editan mujallar TIME , farfesoshi da yawa, IITAP, SASH, Fight The New Drug, TraffickingHub, Exodus Cry, mujallar ilimi Behavioral Sciences , kamfanin iyaye na MDPI, likitocin sojojin ruwa na Amurka, shugaban mujallar ilimi CUREUS, da kuma mujallar Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity . Waɗannan abubuwan da suka faru an yi musu lakabi da "WANDA SUKE." An tsara su daidai bisa ga tsarin lokaci.

Dangane da ni, tun da farko ta yi iƙirarin cewa ni ne batun umarnin "babu hulɗa" . Ta fara zarge ni da yin leƙen asiri a shekarar 2013 lokacin da ita da David Ley suka fara kai hari ga gidan yanar gizona da rubutunsu na PT, " Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa - BA TSORO BA NE ." Lokacin da na ƙalubalanci wasu daga cikin iƙirarin ƙaryarsu , Prause ta yi ƙoƙarin tsoratar da ni don cire martanina ta hanyar zargin ni da yin leƙen asiri.

Tun daga wannan lokacin, ta saba da amfani da wannan zargi a kan mutane da yawa, wadanda aka kawata su da zarge-zargen karya na “barazanar mutuwa,” a fili don dakile nuna son zuciya da mummunan aiki. A takaice dai, labarinta na cin zarafin mutane ya ta'azzara tsawon shekaru kamar yadda ya zamar mata tsangwama.

A ƙarshen shekarar 2020, ba zato ba tsammani ta fara iƙirarin cewa an yi mata fyade a shekarar 2019, kuma ni ne ke da alhakin abin da ba a sani ba. Ta yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa na saka adireshinta a YBOP kuma hakan ya sa wani saurayi ya kama ta a kan titi da skateboard. Ba ta bayar da wata shaida ta gaskiya ba cewa na saka adireshinta na zahiri ko kuma an kama ta.

Abin mamaki shi ne cewa Prause ba ta damu da bayyana min ainihin adireshin gidanta ba lokacin da ta shigar da ƙarar fatara don guje wa biyan ni wasu kuɗin lauya na kimanin dala $40 bayan hukuncin SLAPP da kotu ta yanke min (duba "Abubuwan Shari'a" a ƙasa). Ta kasance da tabbacin cewa ba zan taɓa bayyana shi ba (kuma ba ni da sha'awar yin hakan) - wanda ke nuna yadda ikirarinta na cewa ina son sanya ta cikin haɗari. A gaskiya ma, a cikin shigar da ƙarar fatarar da ta shigar ta rantse cewa ta zauna a wannan adireshin fiye da shekaru 3. Duk da haka a lokaci guda ta yi iƙirarin (ƙarya) cewa ta ƙaura sau da yawa don guje wa masu bin diddiginta (babu su). Duk wani abu da zai haifar da tatsuniyar tsananta mata da aka ƙirƙira!

Kawai don fayyace gaskiya, ban taɓa ƙarfafa kowa ya ci zarafin Prause ba. Kuma ban ga wata shaida da ke nuna cewa wani da na sani ya ci zarafinta ko ya sanya ta cikin haɗari ba. Tana da dabi'ar bayar da "shaidar" da aka ƙirƙira wadda ba ta tabbatar da ikirarinta ba. Misali, tana ɗaukar rahotannin ƙarya da take bayarwa ga jami'an tsaro , wasiƙun C&D ɗinta suna zargin mutane da abubuwan da ba su yi ba, hotunanta marasa amfani, da maganganun da ba a rantse ba na ƙungiyarta a matsayin shaida, kodayake babu wanda ya bayar da shaida bisa ga gaskiya don tallafawa ikirarinta.

Ya kamata a lura cewa 'yar jaridar bincike ta Kanada Diana Davison wacce ta rubuta The Post Millennial ta fallasa a kan Prause , ta yi magana da ita a kan rikodin na tsawon kusan mako guda. A cikin sharhin jama'a a ƙarƙashin wani bidiyo mai alaƙa Davison ta yi sharhi , " Pruse ta faɗi abubuwa da yawa a gare ni amma babu ɗaya daga cikin "shaidarta" da ya goyi bayan ikirarinta. A kowane hali, shaidar ta juya wa wanda ya yi mata zaluncin. Tana zargin wasu da ainihin abubuwan da ita da kanta ta yi. Na yi mata imel, a kan rikodin, na kusan mako guda ." A cikin sharhi na biyu Davison ta ce , " Lokacin da na ce na yi makonni biyu ina bincike wannan yana nufin na karanta kowace takarda a kotu da kowace takarda mai alaƙa kuma na yi mako guda ina aika imel tare da Prause da kanta wacce ta katse ni bayan na fara neman ainihin shaidar cin zarafi. " Prause ta amsa ta hanyar barazanar kai ƙarar Davison da The Post Millennial , kodayake ba ta bi ta ba.

Batutuwan doka

Duk da cewa Prause da abokan hulɗarta suna aiki tuƙuru don su nuna ta a matsayin wanda aka zalunta, a zahiri ita ce mai cin zarafi , a shafukan sada zumunta da kuma a harkokin shari'a . A kotu, wannan bai yi mata kyau ba. Wannan shafin yana ɗauke da nasarori daban-daban na shari'a akan Prause , waɗanda biyu daga cikinsu suka shafe ni. Zan taƙaita su.

A farkon shekarar 2020, Prause ta yi ƙoƙarin ƙarfafa kamfen ɗinta na cin zarafi da kanta ta hanyar shigar da buƙatar hana ni yin magana ba tare da wani dalili ba. A cikin takardunta na ƙarya, Prause ta yi ta ɓata sunan ɗana da kuma yi masa ba'a . Kotun ta ƙi amincewa da buƙatarta a watan Agusta, 2020. Alkali ya kuma amince da buƙatar SLAPP dina (“Ƙarar Dabaru Kan Shiga Harkokin Jama'a”). Wannan yana nufin ya yanke shawarar cewa shari'ar da Prause ta yi ba bisa ƙa'ida ba yunƙuri ne na danne haƙƙin faɗin albarkacin baki na.

A takaice dai, ba a iya tabbatar da ikirarinta na wanda aka zalunta ba. A gaskiya ma, a zaman sauraron karar, an yi watsi da mafi yawan shaidunta a matsayin "jita-jita," "kammalawa," "ba su da mahimmanci" da sauransu. Mako guda kafin zaman sauraron karar, Prause ta yi ta shelanta karya a shafin Twitter cewa tana da "umarnin kariya" a kaina , wanda hakan ya sa mabiyanta da suka fusata su yi min cin zarafi. Jim kadan kafin zaman sauraron karar, lauyanta ya yi kokarin yin murabus saboda ta yi masa barazanar kai shi kara kotu idan bai aikata wani abu da bai dace ba. Sanarwar manema labarai

Na gaba, ta shigar da ƙarar ɓata suna a kaina a Oregon. A watan Janairu, 2021, kotu ta gano cewa Prause ba ta gabatar da ƙararta ba, kuma ta ba ni kuɗi da tarar (wanda Prause ta ƙi biya). Sanarwar manema labarai.

Abin mamaki, Prause ba ta biya ɗayan hukunce-hukuncen da na yi nasara ba. Madadin haka, ta zaɓi kamfen na ɓata suna da barazana a bainar jama'a - kamar ni ne mai laifin maimakon kanta. Ta kuma musanta cewa ta sha kashi a ɗayan shari'o'in shari'ar da ke sama. Abin mamaki.

A gefe guda kuma, a farkon shekarar 2019, Prause ta shigar da ƙarar ƙarya ga hukumomin Alamar Ciniki ta Amurka lokacin da ta nemi kwace alamun kasuwanci na na gama gari , tana mai da'awar cewa ba ta san wanda ke da haƙƙin amfani da URL ɗina da alamun kasuwanci na ba. Ta wannan dabarar, ta nemi samun haƙƙin doka na musamman ga URL ɗina da aka tabbatar. Wannan ƙoƙari ne na bayyananne don yin bincike a kan dukkan shafina. Cikakkun bayanai . Babu shakka, ba shi da kyau a nuna Prause a matsayin wanda aka zalunta, idan aka yi la'akari da mummunan kamfen kamar wannan.

Bayan sa'o'i da yawa na lokacin lauya, na sami rajistar alamar kasuwanci ta ta asali da kuma URL ɗin da ke da alaƙa da keta haƙƙin mallaka, RealYourBrainOnPorn.com . A halin yanzu, asusun Twitter mai alaƙa @BrainOnPorn ya gudanar da ta'addanci na tsawon watanni 18. @BrainOnPorn ya yi amfani da muryarsa ta "ta gama gari" don yin tweet fiye da maganganun ɓatanci da mugunta 1,000 (har zuwa tweets 170 a rana!) game da duk wanda Prause bai yarda da shi ba. Prause ta musanta hannu, amma lura mai sauƙi, wasiƙu daga ma'aikatan RealYBOP, rahoton WIPO, da manyan shaidu sun nuna yadda take gudanar da asusun kafofin watsa labarun RealYBOP da URL (shaida a nan ).

Wasu ɓangarori uku daban-daban sun shigar da ƙarar batanci ga Prause saboda kamfen ɗinta na rashin gaskiya da ɓata rai: Donald L. Hilton, Jr. v. Nicole Prause, et al. , Kotun Gundumar Amurka ta Yankin Yamma na Texas Sashen San Antonio, Shari'a Mai Lamba 5: 19-CV-00755-OLG; Alexander Rhodes v. Nicole Prause, et al. , Kotun Gundumar Amurka ta Yankin Yamma na Pennsylvania, Shari'a Mai Lamba 2:19-cv-01366, da Aaron M. Minc, Esq v. Melissa A. Farmer da Nicole R. Prause , Lambar Shari'a: CV-20-937026 a Gundumar Cuyahoga, Ohio. (Da alama Farmer ta amince da yarjejeniyar, wadda za ta bar Prause a matsayin wadda ake tuhuma kawai. Babu shakka yarjejeniyar ta shafi biyan kuɗi daga kamfanin inshorar Farmer. A cikin wata takardar rantsuwa mai kwanan wata 8 ga Afrilu, 2021, Farmer ta amince da laifinta wajen sake wallafa ƙaryar Prause [ PDF na janyewa ] Prause ta bayyana cewa kamfanin inshorar nata ya ƙi rufe ta saboda ƙarar da Minc ta shigar a kanta, don haka za a iya barin ta kai tsaye da alhakin duk wani koma-baya na kuɗi a cikin wannan ƙarar. Har yanzu tana bin Wilson bashin dangane da nasarar da ya samu a kanta.)

Shari'o'i biyu na farko sun warware a farkon 2021. Duk da cewa ba a bayyana sharuɗɗan ba, yana da kyau a yi hasashen cewa an sami damar cimma matsaya ta hanyar biyan kuɗi mai yawa daga kamfanin inshorar Prause ( takardun kotu sun nuna cewa an tura kuɗi ga masu ƙara). Shari'ar ƙarar ɓata suna ta uku kuma ta baya-bayan nan tana ci gaba da gudana a Ohio. A wannan yanayin, wani abokin aikin Prause wanda ya sake buga sakonnin batanci na Prause abokin tuhuma ne kuma yanzu abin baƙin ciki yana fuskantar alhaki na shiga cikin wannan aika-aika ba tare da sani ba.

Ya kamata a lura cewa Prause kanta tana da tarihin ƙara girma a matsayin mai ƙara mai tayar da hankali. A cikin shekarar da ta gabata ko makamancin haka, ta shigar da ƙarar ƙarar ƙara sama da rabin dozin , kuma, kafin hakan, kimanin rahotannin mugunta 40 a kan mutane da ƙungiyoyi da dama (duk da haka, Prause ba ta taɓa yin nasara a kowace ƙara ba kuma an yi watsi da duk rahotannin ƙaryarta). Prause tana da dogon tarihi na ƙoƙarin yin shiru da kuma ɓata wa duk wanda ba ta yarda da shi ba ta hanyar ƙirƙira iƙirarin cewa ta ci zarafin wani.

Yawancin dakatarwar kafofin watsa labarun

A watan Oktoba, 2015, asusun Twitter na Prause na asali @NicolePrause an dakatar da shi har abada saboda rashin da'a.

A watan Maris, 2018, an haramta asusun Prause's Quora saboda wallafawa da kuma yin ba daidai ba, bayanan sirri.

A watan Oktoba, 2020, an dakatar da asusun Twitter na @BrainOnPorn , wanda da alama Prause ta yi nasara, har abada saboda cin zarafi da cin zarafi da aka yi niyya.

A watan Maris, 2021, an dakatar da asusun Twitter na biyu na kanta, @NicoleRPrause na ɗan lokaci saboda yin "barazana mai ƙarfi."

Ina zargin cewa Prause tana bayan wasu asusun Twitter guda biyu da suka ɓace: @CorrectingWils1 da asusunta na farko na masana'antar batsa @PornHelps.

Hanyoyin watsa labarai da sauransu sun lalace ta hanyar ƙaryar Prause

Kafafen watsa labarai na Burtaniya Scram News sun daina aiki bayan sun biya diyya mai yawa saboda sun buga ƙaryar batanci ta Prause . Na ji cewa VICE ta fuskanci irin wannan ikirarin batanci kuma dole ne ta cire bayanan karya da Prause ta ba ta , wanda hakan ya jawo mata manyan kuɗaɗen shari'a. Na san da kaina cewa mujallar MEL ta gabatar da jerin labarai game da zargin da ake mata na cewa ita ce wacce aka zalunta. Duk da haka, bayan ƙarin bincike, MEL ta ƙi buga ƙaryar Prause - kuma mujallar ba da daɗewa ba ta dakatar da buga ta gaba ɗaya. Da fuskantar shari'a, jaridar Daily Beast ta janye zarge-zargen da Prause ta yi wa wasu mutane. A ƙarshe, an tilasta wa jaridar ɗalibai ta Jami'ar Wisconsin-Lacrosse cire wani labarin "bincike" wanda ke ɗauke da ƙaryar Dr. Prause game da ni (babban lauyan U na W yana da hannu).

Yi amfani da dangantaka mai dadi tare da masana'antar batsa

Bari mu fara da ma'anar “shill”:

Shill… mutum ne wanda yake ba da taimako ga jama'a ko ba da gaskiya ga mutum ko ƙungiya ba tare da bayyana cewa suna da kusanci da mutumin ko ƙungiyar ba. May Masu sayarwa da kamfen talla na ƙwararru zasu iya amfani da shills.

Idan aka yi la'akari da ma'anar da ke sama, a yi la'akari da waɗannan misalai da yawa . Kalmomin yabo suna da alaƙa da batsa , suna nuna tunani ɗaya tilo wanda yake abin mamaki ga masanin kimiyya, ganin cewa masana kimiyya galibi suna kare rashin son kai.

Asusun Twitter guda uku - asusunta na @NicoleRPrause da kuma asusun @BrainOnPorn da aka dakatar ( na biyu daga cikinsu da Prause ta bayyana sun yi nasara) - suna tallafawa, ko tallafawa, masana'antar batsa akai-akai kuma suna kai hari ga masu sukarta.

Da alama Prause ta ƙirƙiri fiye da sockpuppets na Wikipedia 50 (zuwa yanzu) don ƙarfafa sha'awar masana'antar da kuma ɓata wa masu suka suna da gyara na ɓatarwa, tare da wasu sunayen laƙabi da dama da take amfani da su don sakawa a dandalin tattaunawa kan dawo da batsa.

Shekaru kaɗan da suka wuce, Prause tana tallata alaƙarta da masana'antar batsa, ciki har da yin aiki a hukumar gudanarwa ta ƙungiyar masu shirya fina-finan batsa (APAG) da hotunan halartarta a taron masana'antar batsa da na cikin gida . Yanzu, tana ƙoƙarin tsoratar da wasu kada su ambaci ɗaya daga cikin waɗannan abubuwan da ba su dace ba saboda ta yanke shawarar cewa za su cutar da hotonta.

A takaice dai, ba a fayyace dalilin da ya sa duk wani ɗan jarida (wanda ba ya son masana'antar batsa) zai ɗauki Prause a matsayin tushe mai inganci ba. 'Yan jarida suna da alhakin masu karatu su girmama sakamakon alkalai da sauran sakamakon shari'a, kuma kada su bar masu karatu da tunanin cewa gaskiyar zargin Prause za a iya kama ta ko kuma cewa ikirarinta na ɓata suna da inganci. Bayan ta sha kashi a kotu , sau da yawa tana ƙoƙarin sake rubuta tarihi a cikin jaridu da kuma a Wikipedia tare da taimakon editocin da ba su da son kai.

Zai iya zama da wahala ga waɗanda take ɗauka su tantance gaskiya daga labaran ƙarya saboda ikirarinta suna da “mai daɗi” kuma “shaidun” da aka ƙirƙira sun yi yawa. Duk da haka, kamar yadda sakamakona a kotu ya nuna , na tattara takardu da yawa kuma zan iya musanta ikirarinta, idan aka tambaye ni.

Ba duk wanda yake iƙirarin cewa an zalunce shi ba. Wasu suna kawai kokarin ƙoƙarin yin amfani da mutuncinsu na jama'a ko don ɓata suna kuma "ba dandamali" (yin shiru) ga duk wanda ba su yarda da shi ba. Yi tunanin Trump. 'Yan jaridu za su so yin tunani sosai kafin su ba wa Farfajiyar dandamali da za ta haɓaka ƙaryar ta da ɓatanci.

Cikakken Tabarau na Nasihu (duka shafuka 6)

Yi amfani da Shafi # 1

Yi amfani da Shafi # 2

Yi amfani da Shafi # 3

Yi amfani da Shafi # 4

Yi amfani da Shafi # 5

Yi amfani da Shafi # 6

Overview: Nicole Prause na qarya game da wadanda aka yi wa kawanya-hood wanda ba a bayyana shi a matsayin mara tushe: ita ce mai cin zarafin, ba wacce aka azabtar. (an kirkireshi a shekarar 2019)

Tunda da yawa daga cikin maganganun Prause da David Ley sun ta'allaka ne akan tatsuniyoyinsu na cin zarafin "masu fafutukar kare haƙƙin batsa," na karyata ƙage-ƙagensu a cikin wannan sashe na farko (kuma na bayar da ƙarin shaida a ƙarƙashin kowace takamaiman da'awa):

1) Gary Wilson "ya buge jiki" Yin wasa a cikin Los Angeles.

Gaskiya: Ban taɓa zuwa Los Angeles ba tsawon shekaru. Prause ba ta bayar da takardu don wannan da'awar ba, wanda ta fara a watan Afrilu, 2013 (duba ƙasa), kuma ta fara tallatawa a watan Yuli, 2013 ('yan kwanaki bayan na yi suka ga bincikenta na EEG ). Rahoton 'yan sanda guda ɗaya tilo da Prause ( Afrilu, 2018 ) ya bayyana bai ce komai ba game da ni ina bin ta; bai bayar da rahoton wani laifi ba. Madadin haka, Prause ta ba da rahoto ga LAPD saboda halartar wani taron Jamus , wanda Prause ta yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa tana son halarta ( hoton allo) . Gaskiya ne cewa na yi tafiya zuwa Jamus kuma na halarci taron ƙasa da ƙasa na 5 na 2018 kan jarabar ɗabi'a, wanda ya gudana daga 23-25 ga Afrilu (lura cewa Prause ta shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda a ranar 25 ga Afrilu), kuma tana ɗauke da ƙwararru kan jarabar ɗabi'a daga ko'ina cikin duniya.

Bangaren da ba gaskiya ba shine ikirarin Prause cewa ta taɓa yin niyyar halartar taron ICBA a Jamus. Prause ba ta taɓa halarta ko kuma an gayyace ta don gabatarwa a taron ICBA ba. Prause ba ta yarda da jarabar ɗabi'a ba. A duk tsawon aikinta, Prause ta yi yaƙi da manufar jarabar ɗabi'a, musamman jarabar jima'i da batsa . Don haka Prause ta shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda na ƙarya.

Sabuntawa - Agusta, 2020: Hukuncin kotu ya fallasa Nicole Prause a matsayin mai laifi, ba wanda aka zalunta ba . A watan Maris na 2020, Prause ta nemi umarnin hana ni na ɗan lokaci (TRO) ba tare da wani dalili ba ta amfani da "shaidar" da aka ƙirƙira da kuma ƙaryarta ta yau da kullun (tana zargina da bin diddigi). A cikin buƙatar Prause na umarnin hana ni, ta yi wa kanta ƙarya, tana cewa na saka adireshinta a kan YBOP da Twitter ( rantsuwar ƙarya ba sabon abu bane da Prause ). Na shigar da ƙarar adawa da SLAPP a kan Prause saboda amfani da tsarin shari'a (TRO) ba daidai ba don yin shiru da cin zarafi. A ranar 6 ga Agusta, Kotun Koli ta Gundumar Los Angeles ta yanke hukunci cewa ƙoƙarin Prause na samun umarnin hana ni ya zama "ƙarar dabarar da ta shafi shiga jama'a" (wanda aka fi sani da "ƙarar SLAPP") . Prause ta yi ƙarya a cikin TRO ɗinta na yaudara, ba tare da wata shaida da za a iya tabbatarwa ba don tallafawa iƙirarin ta na banza cewa na bi ta ko na musguna mata. A takaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta yi amfani da tsarin hana ni don cin zarafi da kuma rage haƙƙinsa na 'yancin faɗar albarkacin baki. A bisa doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya wajabta wa Prause biyan kuɗin lauya na.

Labari mai yawa na labarin Prause na TRO ya shafi tafiya na zuwa Jamus don halartar ICBA. Prause ta aikata zagi a cikin sanarwar da ta yi na TRO, tana mai karyata cewa ita ce mai gabatar da shirye-shirye ga ICBA, kuma na yi tafiya zuwa Jamus don "fuskance ta". Na san wannan ba ƙarya ba ne, don haka na nemi masu shirya ICBA su ba da tabbacin cewa ba a taɓa neman Prause ya gabatar ba kuma ba a taɓa yin rijistar taron ba. Harafinsu da ke tabbatar da cewa Prause ta yi wa kanta rauni:

Aka sayo a wata karyar.

Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa zarginta na sata ya fara ne da zarar mun haɗu. A gaskiya ma, ta zargi matata da ni da sata a cikin wani imel na watan Afrilu, 2013 wanda ya faru 'yan makonni bayan na buga martani ga rubutun David Ley na Psychology Today inda Prause da shi suka yi niyya ga gidan yanar gizona: “ Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa – BA TSORO BA NE. ” Shafin Ley ya kasance game da binciken EEG na Nicole Prause wanda ba a buga ba, amma har yanzu ba a sake duba shi ba ga takwarorinsa (wannan shine farkon abin da na ji game da Prause).

Prause ta fara tuntuɓarta ta farko da ni a cikin imel guda biyu da kuma sharhi a ƙarƙashin amsar Psychology Today dina . A lokaci guda, ta tuntuɓi editocin Psychology Today , waɗanda suka tura imel ɗinta na biyu. Waɗannan imel guda biyu sun fito ne daga ƙarshen ɗan gajeren musayar mu ( hotunan allo na dukkan musayar imel na Prause & Wilson ):

Kamar yadda kuke gani, Prause tana zarginmu da bin diddiginta, kodayake abin da kawai na yi shi ne amsa imel guda biyu da ta aiko min. Nan ne aka fara da'awar "bin diddigin" da Prause ta ƙirƙira.

Prause ta fara kamfen ɗinta na farko na " Gary Wilson mai bin diddigi ne" watanni 3 bayan haka, nan da nan bayan na buga sukata da na yi wa Steele et al., 2013 , wanda ya nuna cewa ta yi kuskuren bayyana ainihin abubuwan da Steele ta gano . Prause ta ƙirƙiri sunayen laƙabi da yawa don ɓata mini suna, gami da wannan tashar YouTube, GaryWilson Stalker . Hoton hoton akwatin saƙona na YouTube daga Yuli 26, 2013 ya bayyana yadda Prause ke ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo ( PDF na sunayen laƙabi na Nicole Prause da ta saba yi wa cin zarafi & ɓata suna ):

Tambaya: Shin na yi tafiyar mil mil 800 zuwa Los Angeles a ranar da na buga cikakken bayani game da abin da zan yi game da UCLA, ko Prause ya fara kamfen ɗin da ke akwai na cin nasara a ranar bayan zargi na? Bari muje ayi gwaji mu fallasa gaskiya.

Sabuntawa (Agusta, 2020): An shigar da ƙarar fatara don ƙoƙarin: 1) Ku fita daga biyan abin da doka ta ce tana bin ni (kuɗin lauya), saboda rashin shigar da ƙarar SLAPP, da kuma, 2) Ku guji ƙararraki uku na ɓata suna da aka shigar a kanta (Don Hilton, Alex Rhodes , Aaron Minc ). A cikin shigar da ƙarar fatara ta bayyana, a ƙarƙashin hukuncin rantsuwar ƙarya, cewa ta ci gaba da zama a wuri ɗaya tsawon shekaru 3 da suka gabata. Wannan ya karyata ikirarin da take yi akai-akai cewa an tilasta mata ƙaura sau da yawa a cikin 'yan shekarun nan saboda ana bin ta.

Tatsuniyoyinta da aka kirkira a hankali koyaushe suna cikin motsi saboda 'bibiyar' 'warwatsewa.

2) Dr. Prause yana bukatar “masu gadi a wurin tattaunawa” saboda Gary Wilson ya yi barazanar halarta

Gaskiya: Prause bai bayar da wani takardu game da wannan da'awar mara hankali ba, wanda aka yi magana a cikin wannan sashe: Prause ta sa mai gabatarwa Susan Stiritz ta "yi wa 'yan sandan harabar jami'a gargaɗi" cewa Gary Wilson zai iya tashi mil 2000 don sauraron Prause yana cewa jarabar batsa ba gaskiya ba ce . Duk da cewa Prause na iya neman masu gadi masu dauke da makamai (ko mayaƙan ninja), kawai don adana labarinta na almara da aka tsara a hankali game da wanda aka azabtar. Wannan farfaganda ce mara amfani ta wata mai ɓata suna da mai cin zarafi da aka ambata a cikin aƙalla ƙararraki 3.

3) Dr.Prause ya gabatar da rahotanni da yawa "'yan sanda & FBI" a kan Gary Wilson

Gaskiya: Tun daga watan Yuli, 2013 (kwanaki kaɗan bayan na buga sharhi mai zurfi game da binciken farko na Prause na EEG ), sunayen masu amfani daban-daban sun fara wallafa maganganun batanci duk inda sunana ya bayyana. Sharhin sun yi kama da juna a cikin abun ciki da sautin magana, suna da'awar ƙarya cewa "Wilson yana da rahoton 'yan sanda da aka shigar a kansa," "An tuhumi Wilson da bin diddigin wata mata talaka," da kuma "Wilson ya sace hotunan wata mata ya sanya su a shafin batsa," da kuma "An kai rahoton Wilson ga LAPD (wanda ya yarda cewa yana da haɗari) da kuma 'yan sandan harabar UCLA."

Zuwa shekarar 2016, yayin da Prause ba ta sake aiki a UCLA ko wata cibiya da za ta iya rage cin zarafinta ta yanar gizo ba, a ƙarshe ta fara gane Gary Wilson a matsayin "mutumin" da ta kai rahoto ga LAPD da 'yan sandan harabar UCLA. Ban je LA tsawon shekaru ba. Kusan shekarar 2020 ce, kuma babu wata hukumar tsaro da ta taɓa tuntuɓar ni. (Duk wani mai cin zarafin zai iya shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda na bogi, ko kuma ya yi amfani da kotuna ba daidai ba )

Na yi zaton cewa Prause, a gaskiya ma, ya shigar da rahotannin zamba, marasa tushe (waɗanda daga baya aka yi watsi da su), amma sai ya zama Prause yana ƙarya - kuma. A ƙarshen 2017, wani kira zuwa ga Sashen 'Yan Sanda na Los Angeles da 'yan sandan harabar UCLA sun bayyana babu wani rahoto a cikin tsarinsu game da "Gary Wilson," ko kuma wani rahoto da "Nicole Prause" ta shigar. Na ƙirƙiri wannan sashe don bayar da rahoton abubuwan da na gano: Sashen 'Yan Sanda na Los Angeles da 'yan sandan harabar UCLA sun tabbatar da cewa Prause ta yi ƙarya game da shigar da rahotannin 'yan sanda kan Gary Wilson.

Kamar yadda aka rubuta a sama, na gano a watan Maris na 2019 cewa Prause ta shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda na bogi a ranar 25 ga Afrilu, 2018. Lura cewa ban ji labarin wannan rahoton 'yan sanda mara komai daga 'yan sanda ba. Na ji labarinsa shekara guda bayan haka, lokacin da ɗaliban 'yan jarida (da kuma masu goyon bayan Prause) suka sake buga shi a bainar jama'a a kan layi a wata jaridar jami'a . Tun daga lokacin hukumomin Jami'ar Wisconsin suka cire shi.

An rarraba rahoton LAPD na Prause a matsayin "cin zarafi ta yanar gizo", ba cin zarafi ta zahiri ba (ban yi ko ɗaya ba). Ba ta (kuskura) ta bayar da rahoton wani laifi na gaske ba. Madadin haka, Prause ta kai rahoto ga LAPD don:

halartar taron Jamusawa, wanda Prause ƙarya ta ce ya so halarta (amma ba ta yi kuskure ba saboda ta yi ikirarin ta firgita ni). Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa Prause bazata san cewa na shirya halarta ba (sai ta gabatar da rahoto ga 'yan sanda game da ranar bayan taron ya kare).
aika hoton hotunan da ke lalata ta a shafuka na 2 suna lalata halayyar ta (shafi na 1, shafi na 2, shafi na 3), da kuma kin cire su dan amsa mata 3 kokarin da baiyi nasara ba, yaudarar DMCA takedown.

Idan ina bin diddiginta a zahiri , me yasa wani rahoton 'yan sanda bai bayyana ni a matsayin mai yin hakan ba? Abu ne mai sauƙi: Ana jin tsoron a kama ni saboda da gangan na shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda da ke zargina da aikata laifi.

A ƙarshe, tun daga shekarar 2018, Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa ta kai rahoton Alex Rhodes da Gary Wilson ga FBI saboda laifukan da ba a bayyana ba. Ni da Rhodes mun shigar da buƙatun FOIA ga FBI don gano ko Prause tana faɗin gaskiya. Ba ta faɗi gaskiya ba. Don ƙarin bayani duba waɗannan sassa biyu: (1) FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Prause ta yi ƙarya game da shigar da rahoton FBI akan Gary Wilson , (2) FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Nicole Prause ta yi ƙarya game da shigar da rahoto akan Alexander Rhodes . FBI ta ƙarfafa ni in shigar da rahoto akan Prause saboda ƙarya game da shigar da rahoton FBI: Disamba, 2018: Gary Wilson ta shigar da rahoton FBI akan Nicole Prause. Ana iya tunanin cewa Prause ta shigar da rahoton FBI bayan Oktoba, 2018, amma kalamanta mai shafuka 86 ba su haɗa da ainihin rahoton FBI ba (kawai hoton CD, mai lakabin "FBI").

A shekarar 2019, Diana Davison ta zama 'yar jarida ta farko da ta yi bincike kan ikirarin Prause na cewa an ci zarafin wanda aka zalunta. A lokacin makon da suka yi suna sadarwa, Prause ba ta iya bayar da wata shaida ba sai dai wauta ta LAPD ta Prause na halartar wani taron Jamus. Prause ta yi ƙarya game da son halarta. Davison ya fallasa 'yana nan: The Post Millennial ya fallasa' akan Nicole Prause . Diana Davison ta kuma samar da wannan bidiyon na mintuna 6 game da karyar da Prause ta yi wa wanda aka zalunta da kuma kararrakin bata suna da aka shigar a kan Prause.

Bidiyon Diana Davison ya ba da hanyar haɗi zuwa jerin abubuwan da suka faru na tarihin kamfen ɗin Prause na kusan shekaru 7 na cin zarafi, ɓata suna, barazana, da zarge-zargen ƙarya: Jadawalin Yaƙin Ilimi na VSS ( An cire lokacin da aka yi amfani da shi .)

Da ke ƙasa akwai maganganu masu bayyanawa sosai a ƙarƙashin bidiyon Diana Davison (a martani ga mai sharhi mai cike da damuwa da kuma mai son Prause):

-----------

-----------

A cikin wannan makon, wata mai ba da rahoto kan bincike, Megan Fox ta PJ Media, ta fitar da wani labarin makamancin haka game da Nicole Prause: "Alex Rhodes na Ƙungiyar Tallafawa Addiction Porn 'NoFap' ta tuhumi Masanin Jima'i na batsa da ke da alaƙa da batsa don ɓata suna."

4) Gary Wilson ya "keta dokar ba-lamba"

Gaskiya: Babu irin wannan umarni. Prause tana ƙoƙarin yaudarar jama'a su yarda cewa kotu ta amince da ni a hukumance, wato, ta sami umarnin hana ko kuma umarnin hana. Ba ta yi ba. Amma hakan bai hana ta zargina a bainar jama'a da sauran waɗanda abin ya shafa da muguntarta na "keta umarnin hana hulɗa" da kuma "cin zarafi." Ma'anar furucinta a bayyane, kuma a bayyane yake ƙarya ce, ita ce nuna cewa ni da wasu muna aikata ba bisa ƙa'ida ba. An ƙirƙiro dabarunta na zalunci da kuma zarge-zargen ƙarya da gangan don cin zarafi da tsoratar da waɗanda abin ya shafa na cin zarafin yanar gizo ta yanar gizo don tsoro da shiru. An shigar da ƙararraki biyu na ɓata suna a kanta. Ya isa ya ce.

Kamar yadda aka rubuta a sashe na farko na shafin Prause , Prause ta fara tuntuɓar imel ɗin da ta taɓa faruwa da ni. Wannan musayar imel ɗin ta faru ne a watan Afrilu, 2013 ( hotunan hotunan dukkan musayar imel ɗinmu ). Yayin da take iƙirarin cewa ta sami umarnin ƙarya na "babu hulɗa," Prause ta buga maganganu marasa daɗi game da ni sau ɗaruruwan a Twitter, Facebook da Quora. Bugu da ƙari, Prause ta yi amfani da sunayen laƙabi sama da 200 tsawon shekaru don ɓata sunana da wasu ( PDF na sunayen laƙabi na Nicole Prause da ta saba wa cin zarafi & ɓata suna ). Ta kuma yi amfani da asusun imel na sunayen laƙabi don yaɗa ƙarya game da ni.

Na amsa kaɗan daga cikin hare-haren batanci na Prause akan layi, ina watsi da "lambobin sadarwa" marasa adadi daga gare ta. Misali, a cikin lokaci guda na awanni 24 Prause ta buga sharhi 10 na Quora game da ni - wanda ya haifar da dakatarwar ta har abada . A wani misali Prause ( ta amfani da RealYBOP Twitter ) ta buga tweets sama da 120 game da ni a cikin kwanaki 4 ( PDF na tweets ). Misalai kaɗan na Prause ta fara cin zarafi da ɓata suna sannan ta yi iƙirarin zama wanda aka zalunta sannan ta ƙare da iƙirarin game da "umarnin da ba a tuntuɓar" na ta na ƙarya:

5) Gary Wilson ya yi amfani da harshe na misogynistic don lalata Dokta Prause

Gaskiya: Ba gaskiya ba ne. Prause da Ley sun bayar da misali ɗaya tilo. Na rubuta "Miss" Prause ba da gangan ba a cikin martanin da na mayar wa Dr. Prause yana tambaya game da girman azzakarina. Wannan shine iyakar shaidarta ta nuna rashin son matata. Ba wasa ba ne.

Kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin wannan sashe , lokacin da kuskurena ya faru a ranar 18 ga Disamba, 2013 Prause ta kasance cikin wani mummunan hari ta yanar gizo, tana wallafa ƙaryarta game da ɓatancin Kamfanin Watsa Labarai na Kanada a kan dandali inda sunana ya bayyana. Ta amfani da sunaye na ƙarya, Prause sau da yawa tana yin amfani da dandali na dawo da batsa tana ambaton kimiyyar batsa da kuma cin zarafin membobin da ke ƙoƙarin warkar da amfani da batsa da/ko ED da batsa ya haifar. A cikin sharhinta na CBC akan YourBrainRebalanced Prause (as RealScience) ta tambayi Wilson: "Yaya ƙanƙantar azzakarinka Gary yake? "

Hoton hoton da ke sama, tare da amsar da na bayar inda na rubuta " Miss Pr ause " ba da gangan ba don amsa tambayarta game da azzakarina, ya ƙunshi "shaidar" da Prause ke amfani da ita don yin min ƙarya a matsayin mai son ɓatanci. A nan Prause ta wallafa wani sigar sharhin "RealScience" mai wahalar karantawa:

Haɗi zuwa cikakken amsar da na bayar . Wani ɓangare na sharhina inda na yi amfani da "Miss" Praise:

Tabbas yin jima'i yana nuna wariya ga mata idan tana buƙatar cikakkun bayanai game da girman azzakarina. Duk da haka, ta canza rubuta "Miss" ba da gangan ba a cikin amsar da na bayar ga tambayoyinta game da mazan aurena zuwa wani ɓangare na kamfen ɗinta mara tushe don nuna ni da wasu a matsayin masu son ɓatanci. A cikin wannan sashe akwai misalai kaɗan na yadda Prause ta yi amfani da makami wajen nuna sha'awarta ga girman azzakarina da martanina.

A cikin 'yan shekarun nan, da alama Dr. Prause ta ɗauki matakai masu yawa don ta sanya kanta a matsayin "mace da ake azabtar da ita idan ta faɗi gaskiya ga iko." Sau da yawa tana aika saƙonnin da ke tafe a shafinta na Twitter waɗanda a bayyane suke suna rabawa a laccocinta na jama'a, suna nuna cewa ana cin zarafinta "a matsayinta na mace masanin kimiyya," kuma tana zana kanta a matsayin mai bin diddigin abubuwan da ke faruwa don tabbatar da rashin lahani na batsa duk da hare-haren nuna wariya.

Ya zarge ni, matata Don Hilton MD, da kuma wanda ya kafa Alexander Rhodes na misogyny tare da ba da tabbacin “shaida.” Duk wata shawarar da ni (ko matata), Hilton, ko Rhodes suna motsawa ta hanyar misogyny an ƙirƙira shi, kamar yadda ƙin yardawarmu ba shi da alaƙa da Dr. Prause a matsayin mutum ko a matsayin mace, kuma kawai ya yi da maganganun da ba na gaskiya ba da rashin dacewar su. goyan bayan da'awar game da binciken.

Dangane da Infographic, kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama, shaidar da Prause ta bayar game da nuna wariya ita ce na taɓa rubuta "Miss Prause" bisa kuskure a lokacin da ta yi tambaya game da girman azzakarina. Iƙirarin da ta yi cewa matata mai nuna wariya ce abin dariya ne. Iƙirarin da ta yi cewa Don Hilton MD ta kira ta "mai lalata yara" wani ƙarya ne, kamar yadda wannan sashe ya bayyana gaba ɗaya.

Ta kira Alexander Rhodes a matsayin misogynist saboda ya yi ƙoƙarin faɗi hakan Ni ba 'rauni na jiki' ta - duk da haka ita ce mai aikata wannan aika-aika, tsoratarwa da kuma kushe samarin da suka sami sauki daga lalatawar batsa. Duba takardun: Gabe Deem #1, Gabe Deem #2, Alexander Rhodes #1, Alexander Rhodes #2, Alexander Rhodes #3, Nuhu Ikilisiya, Alexander Rhodes #4, Alexander Rhodes #5, Alexander Rhodes #6, Alexander Rhodes #7, Alexander Rhodes #8, Alexander Rhodes #9, Alexander Rhodes #10, Alex Rhodes # 11, Gabe Deem & Alex Rhodes tare # 12, Alexander Rhodes #13, Alexander Rhodes #14, Gabe Deem #4, Alexander Rhodes #15.

A takaice, duk wanda ya tona asirin karya ta Prause ko kuma bayyana bayanan binciken to za a masa lakabi da “mai son nuna wariya,” da fatan mutane masu hankali za su yarda da kalaman na sa. Tana yin hakan ne don rufe ainihin muhawara a shafin ta na Twitter da sauran kafofin dandalin sada zumunta, don hana yada labaran karyarta.

Abin mamaki ne cewa zane-zanenta na bayanai ya ƙunshi misalai huɗu na nuna wariya daga sharhin YouTube da ba a san ko su waye ba a ƙarƙashin tattaunawar TEDx ɗinta. A cikin 2013, TED ta rufe tsokaci a ƙarƙashin jawabin Gary Wilson na TEDx don mayar da martani ga maganganun ƙiyayya da ɓatanci da Nicole Prause ta yi ( duba wannan sashe ).

Ina fatan ganin kararraki biyu na bata suna ( Donald Hilton, MD & wanda ya kafa Nofap Alexander Rhodes ) za su je shari'ar alkalai, da kuma kasancewa a kan gaba wajen gabatar da shaida. Ina fatan musamman ganin an tilasta wa Prause da Ley su bayar da shaida ko takardu na gaske, maimakon 'yan tsirarun "shaidar karya" da suka samar da kansu. Ina fatan a yi musu tambayoyi daban-daban da kuma fallasa masu cin zarafin biyu a matsayin wadanda suka aikata laifin, ba wadanda abin ya shafa ba.

**Maris & Afrilu 2013: Farkon maganganun Nicole Prause, barazanar da tursasawa (bayan ita da David Ley sun yi niyyar Wilson a cikin Psychology yau post blog)**

Batun farko: Yi amfani da farawa duk lambobin kai tsaye tare da Gary Wilson. Gwadawa yana ci gaba da musgunawa a bainar jama'a da ɓata sunan Wilson yayin lokaci guda (ƙarya) yana iƙirarin cewa yana ƙarƙashin umarnin "babu mai tuntuɓar" kotu. Babu irin wannan tsari. Gwadawa yana ƙoƙari ya yaudari jama'a su yarda cewa kotu ta ba ni izini a hukumance, watau, cewa ta sami umarnin hanawa ko umarni. Ba ta da. Amma wannan ba zai hana ta daga zargin bainar jama'a da zargina da sauran wadanda abin ya rutsa da ita na "karya dokar lamba" da kuma "tursasawa." Bayyanannen, kuma bayyanannen ƙarya, ma'anar maganganunta shine a nuna ni da wasu muna aiki ba bisa ƙa'ida ba. Dabarun ta na fada da kuma zarge-zargen karya da gangan ana lissafasu don tursasawa da tsoratar da wadanda suka addabi yanar gizo cikin fargaba da nutsuwa. An shigar da kararraki batanci biyu a kanta. Ya isa ya ce.

Maris 5, 2013

Marubucin "Tatsuniya ta Jima'i," David Ley, da Nicole Prause sun haɗu don rubuta wani rubutu a shafin yanar gizo na Psychology Today mai taken dabarun: " Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa - BA TSORO BA ce." (Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa gidan yanar gizo ne da Wilson ya kafa.) Ya kasance game da binciken EEG na Nicole Prause wanda ba a buga ba, amma har yanzu ba a sake duba shi ba ga takwarorinsa ( "Sha'awar jima'i, ba jima'i ba, yana da alaƙa da martanin jijiyoyi da hotunan jima'i ke haifarwa" ).

Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa Ley ne kawai ya sami damar yin amfani da karatun da ba a buga ba (an buga shi watanni 5 daga baya). Shafin yanar gizon da aka danganta da gidan yanar gizon Wilson 'Brainka a Yanar gizo' kuma ya ba da shawarar cewa YBOP yana goyon bayan hana batsa (ba gaskiya ba).

Muhimmin batu na biyu: Watanni biyar kafin a buga nazarin EEG na Prause ( Steele et al ., 2013), duka Prause da Ley suna kai hari ga Gary Wilson da gidan yanar gizon sa.

Maris 7, 2013

Wilson ya buga wani rubutu a shafin yanar gizo na Psychology Today wanda ke mayar da martani ga abubuwan da ke cikin rubutun David Ley. Daga ƙarshe editocin Psychology Today sun cire rubutun Ley da martanin Wilson , saboda binciken da ke ƙasa bai samu ba tukuna. Kuna iya samun ainihin rubuce-rubucen shafin yanar gizo na Ley da Wilson da aka adana a nan . Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa rubutun shafin yanar gizo na Wilson ya bayyana a sarari cewa yana mayar da martani ne kawai ga bayanin Ley game da binciken Prause. Daga baya Nicole Prause za ta zargi Wilson da yin kuskuren yin nazarinta (wanda ita da Ley kaɗai suka gani, kuma suna yin iƙirarin jama'a game da - waɗanda daga baya aka nuna ba su da tushe ).

Muhimmin batu na uku : sharhi guda takwas da aka yi wa Steele et al., 2013 daga baya sun yi daidai da nazarin Wilson, kuma sun fallasa Prause a matsayin wanda ke ɓatar da bincikenta ga manema labarai.

Maris 7, 2013

Wilson ya gabatar a ƙarƙashin labarin David Ley yana neman binciken:

“Ya kai David - Ina mamakin yadda ka sanya hannunka kan binciken da har yanzu ba a buga shi ba, ko aka ambata a ko'ina. Ko kana shirye ka aiko min da kwafi? ”

David Ley bai amsa ba.

Afrilu 10, 2013 (PDF tare da hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na musayar email din mu gaba daya):

Dangane da sharhin da ke sama, Prause ya tuntuɓi editocin Psychology Today , ya yi tsokaci a ƙarƙashin labarin PT dina, kuma ya aika wa Wilson imel mai zuwa. A cikin imel ɗin, Prause ya kai wa Wilson hari da kansa, kuma ya faɗi kuskure cewa bai nemi binciken ba. A zahiri, ya nemi David Ley ya yi hakan. Imel ɗin:

Psychology Yau ([email kariya])
4/10/13
don: [email kariya]

Daga: Nicole Prause
Ya Mista Wilson,

Ba doka ba ce a gare ku ku yi kuskuren gabatar da iliminmu ba tare da ko da kwafin rubutun ba. Za'a kula dashi kamar haka. Labarinmu ya daidaita sosai. Ba kamar ku ba, Ina da wallafe-wallafe na bita a bangarorin biyu na wannan batun. Kun yi ƙoƙari ku ɓata shi ta hanyar bayanin abubuwan da ba a yi ba. Ina bin wannan ne tare da Psychology yau a yanzu, amma zan shawarce ku da ku cire mukamin da kanku kafin a tilasta ni in ci gaba da aiki.

Ba ku da damar izinin kowane ɓangare na wannan imel ɗin. Sakamakon sadarwa ne.

Sayar da littattafanku bisa cancantar ku. Kada kuyi ƙoƙarin neman kuɗi ta bayan masana kimiyya suna yin aikinsu. Zan iya fada wa wannan binciken a fili yana firgita ku saboda zane da bayanan suna da karfi, amma abin takaici ne da ba a nemi kwafin rubutun ba kuma kawai kun cika abun ciki. Kunya gare ki.

Nicole Prause, PhD
Binciken bincike
UCLA

Bugu da ƙari, editocin Psychology Today sun aika imel na biyu daga Prause:

Kwanan wata: Afrilu 10, 2013 5: 13: 30 PM EDT
Tambaya: Sharhi a kan Blogs

Daga: Nicole Prause, PhD

Ga wanda ya damu:

Na yi mamakin ganin wani labarin da Gary Wilson ya rubuta game da wani bincike da ya yi mini a Psychology Today.

Ba ni da matsala tare da shi wanda yake wakiltar ra'ayinsa da fassarorin karatunsa, amma baiyi ba, kuma ba zai iya samun damar shiga wurina ba. An yi la'akari da shi kuma bai taba buƙatar kwafi daga kowane mawallafi ba. Na sanar da shi cewa ya kamata a cire shi. Bai riga ya yi haka ba. Tabbas, idan an rubuta shi a fili, zai sami damar yin amfani da ita kuma zai iya wakilta shi (mafi kyau).

Tabbas, yin kuskuren sane da mutum ya yi musu lalata ba bisa ka'ida ba ne. Ina fata Psychology Yau za ta dauki wannan matsala. Zan tuntubi wasu mambobin kwamitin, idan kullunku ya cika kuma yana iya ɗaukar tsawon lokaci don amsawa.

Na gode don taimakon ku wajen magance wannan al'amari.

gaskiya,
Nicole Prause, PhD

A lokaci guda, Prause ya buga wannan sharhi a ƙarƙashin rubutun Gary Wilson na Psychology Today:

Bincike ba buƙata ko sake dubawa ba

Ƙaddamar da Nicole Prause, PhD a kan Afrilu 10, 2013 - 1:54 pm.

Abin takaici, waɗannan marubuta ba su buƙatar samun dama ga rubutunmu ba, don haka basu zahiri ba. Sun sanya wasu kurakurai masu kuskuren da suka saba wa kimiyya a cikin wannan labarin. Ni ne mai binciken wanda zai tuntube don cire wannan labarin saboda rashin kulawa da mawallafin.

Yanzu muna amfani da wannan a matsayin misali na misali game da ma'anar kimiyya a cikin kafofin watsa labaru yanzu, duk da haka, don haka na gode don wannan dama.

Labaran doka marar tushe, da'awar karya, da kuma kunna wanda aka azabtar ya fara ne a farkon hulɗa da Wilson. Babu wani abu da ya dace ya nuna gaskiya ne:

Wilson bai bayyana karatun Prause ba ko ɓata shi ta kowace hanya. Ya amsa kawai ga na Ley description na binciken. Karanta Ley's da Wilson's blog posts kuma ku yi hukunci a kanku.
Har wa yau Kuskuren bai riga ya karyata kalma daya a Wilson ta Maris, 2013 Psychology yau post, ko nazarin Wilson ya rubuta a Yuli bayan nazarin binciken EEG a ƙarshe ya buga. Kuma Ba'a yi masa kariya ba a kalma ɗaya a cikin 8 jarrabawa nazari game da ita ta 2013 EEG.
Wilson bai sanya kudi ba daga wannan aikin.
Wilson ya buƙaci kwafin nazarin (Kariya ya ƙi kawo shi).
Yi amfani da farawa tare da Wilson.

Amsar imel ɗin Wilson ga Nicole Prause:

A ranar Laraba, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:14 PM, gary wilson <> ya rubuta:

Hi Nicole,

Na yi sharhi a cikin sharhin ku. Yi kallo.

Ba mu da kuɗi a kan wannan. Gidan yanar gizo na ba shi da talla kuma ba mu karɓar kyauta. Ba mu da sabis don sayarwa. Ba ni da littafin da zan sayar. Littafin matata, wanda ya bayyana akan PT, ba batun batsa bane.

Idan kuna son yin adalci da gaske, da fatan za a aiko mana da cikakken binciken kuma ku ba mu izinin yin blog game da shi - kamar yadda kuka yi da Dr. Ley.

Zan jira karatun ku,

Gary Wilson

Afrilu 12, 2013

Kwana biyu bayan haka Prause ta sake tuntuɓar Wilson tana barazanar ƙara ɗaukar mataki na shari'a. Ta bi diddigin ɗaya daga cikin maganganun Wilson akan shafin dawo da batsa na Your Brain Rebalanced [tun daga 21 ga Fabrairu 2023 wannan hanyar haɗin ba ta samuwa yanzu]. An buga shi a kan dogon zaren game da rubutun David Ley na asali. An yi nufin sharhin Wilson don bayyana dalilin da yasa aka cire rubuce-rubucen Ley da Wilson na Psychology Today ta Psychology Today . Wannan ya nuna tsarin Prause na yin amfani da yanar gizo, saboda binciken Google ba zai iya gano wannan sakon ba. Ta yaya Prause ya san game da wannan zaren a dandalin dawo da batsa?

Imel ɗin da ake amfani dasu:

Nicole Prause (nprause@________)
4/12/13

Ya Mista Wilson,

A cikin gidanku: http://yourbrainrebalanced.com/index.php?topic=7522.50
Kuna da'awar ƙarya: "Na amsa mata saƙon imel mara kyau tare da buƙatar ganin karatun ta, amma ta ƙi."

Wannan shi ne lalata. Don Allah a cire wannan sakon ko zan bi tare da aikin shari'a.

Nicole Farko

Wilson amsa:

A ranar Fri, Apr 12, 2013 a 11:09 AM, gary wilson <> ya rubuta:

Ƙaunar Nicole Farko,

Wataƙila ba ku sani ba cewa matata ta kammala karatun makarantar koyon aikin lauya ta Yale. Ban ce komai ba. A zahiri, maganganun na sunyi daidai.

1) Kun ƙi yarda da nazarin binciken da ba a buga ba.

2) Kun kasance m da barazana, kamar yadda kuke yanzu.

3) Bugu da} ari, ka yi maƙirarin cewa, na ba da ku] a] en ku] a] e, daga wa] ansu mutane, da ke fafitikar dawowa daga buri.

4) Har ila yau, kun ɓata matsayin na PT, saboda ya kasance bayyananniyar amsa ga bayanin David Ley na binciken da ba a buga ba. Ba ku zaɓi gyara bayanin Ley ba ko ku ba ni cikakken binciken, koda lokacin da na yi tambaya game da shi a cikin ɓangaren sharhi wata ɗaya da suka gabata.

Har yanzu ba ku amsa tambayoyin na na asali (da aka gabatar a cikin sashe ba)

1) Me yasa kuka saki karatun ku ga David Ley kawai? Kamar yadda marubucin "Labari na Jima'i Jima'i," kuma wanda ya yi iƙirarin batsa batsa ba zai iya zama, me ya sa shi kaɗai ne zaɓaɓɓe?

2) Me yasa baku gyara fassarar karatun karatun David Ley ba? An kwashe sama da wata guda, kuma kun yi sharhi sau biyu a kansa a cikin watan da ya gabata.

3) Kunyi sharhi a ƙarƙashin rubutun Ley wata ɗaya da suka gabata. Nan da nan na sanya tsokaci a ƙarƙashin ku sharhi, tare da takamaiman takamaiman tambayoyin da aka yi muku game da karatunku. Wannan shine damar ku don amsawa da bayar da binciken. Ba ku yi ba. Me ya sa?

Ina lafiya tare da yin musayar mu ga jama'a. Shin ba zai zama mai ban sha'awa ba lokacin da kuka shigar da ƙara a kan wasu masu rubutun ra'ayin yanar gizon PT waɗanda suka yi ƙoƙari su ɗauki bincikenku?

Mafi,
Gary Wilson

Yi amfani da imel sake tare da ƙarin da'awa da barazanar shari'a [Lura: Wilson ko matarsa ba su taɓa fara hulɗa da Prause ba. Ita ce wadda ta tuntube su akai-akai kuma ta yi musu barazanar ɗaukar matakin shari'a mara tushe.]

Daga: nprause@________ Kwanan wata: Jumu'a, 12 Afrilu 2013 15:01:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [PT] Tambaya via Psychology A yau

Ya ƙaunata Gary,

Wannan don sanar da kai da matarka cewa hulɗar ku (kai da matarka) ba a so. Dangane da dokokin bin diddigi a jiharku ( http://courts.oregon.gov/Lane/Restraining.page ), duk wani ƙarin hulɗar cin zarafi za a fassara shi a matsayin cin zarafi da za a iya ɗauka a matsayin abin da za a iya ɗauka a kansa.

Ba ku da izini na raba wannan sadarwar sirri a kowane taron.

Nicole Farko

Wilson ya aiko imel na ƙarshe zuwa Gidajen aiki, don saita rikodin a madaidaiciya: cewa ita ce wanda ke farawa da duk lambar sadarwa da kuma mutumin da yake barazanar (da kuma ƙaryar ƙarya):

Daga: [email protected]

Don: nprause Subject: RE: [PT] Tambaya ta Psychology A yau

Kwanan wata: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15: 44: 12 -0700

Ƙaunar Nicole Farko,

Tashin hankali? Ban ƙaddamar da musayar imel daya tare da ku ba, har da wannan.
Na farko, farawa a kan 4 / 10 / 13, inda kake da imel ɗin karshe. Kuma wanda ke ƙasa, inda kake ƙoƙarin ƙirƙirar ƙarya cewa wani yana tursasa ka, lokacin da hakika kana barazana ni a karo na biyu.

Hakanan kai ne wanda ya tuntuɓi editan Psychology yau don ya sa baki a cikin rubutun na. Matata ba ta taɓa tuntuɓarku da abin da za a yi ba.

Ba mu buƙatar izinin ka.

Gary Wilson

Ƙarshen farkon tare da Nicole Prause.

Lura: An yi wa musayar imel ɗin da ke sama lakabi da "umarnin da ba a taɓa yi ba". Ba haka ba ne. Prause ta ci gaba da cin zarafin Wilson a shafukan sada zumunta da kuma a bayan fage, yayin da take iƙirarin cewa an hana Wilson amsa ƙaryarta. Yayin da Prause ta kawo ƙarshen hare-haren da ta kai wa kafofin sada zumunta ta hanyar yin iƙirarin "buƙatar da ba a taɓa yi ba", babu wani abu makamancin haka. "Buƙatar da ba a taɓa yi ba" tana da ƙarfi kamar neman wani ya "dakatar ya ji warin wardi". Prause tana ƙoƙarin yaudarar jama'a (mabiyan Twitter ɗinta) su yarda cewa ta sami umarnin hana ko umarnin. Ba ta yi ba. Tweet kawai. Tarin shara ne na ƙarya da aka ƙirƙira wanda aka azabtar da shi ta ainihin mai laifi, Prause.

**Late Yuli, 2013: Yi aiki da wallafa ta nazarin EEG (Steele et al., 2013). Wilson yayi bayanin shi. Yin amfani yana amfani da sunayen masu amfani masu yawa don sakawa ƙarya a yanar gizo**

A ƙarshen watan Yuli na 2013, an buga nazarin EEG na Prause ( Steele et al. , 2013). Ya zo da labarai da yawa, ciki har da wannan Hirar Prause ta mai rubutun ra'ayin kanka a yanar gizo na Psychology Today : Tambayoyin Nazarin Kwakwalwa Kasancewar "Jima'i Jaraba ." Bayan 'yan kwanaki, Gary Wilson ya buga cikakken nazarinsa game da Steele et al. , 2013 da iƙirarin Prause da aka gabatar a cikin hirar da ke sama da kuma wasu wurare. Wilson ya buga shi a shafinsa na Psychology Today kamar Babu Abin da Ya Yi Daidai Da Komai A cikin Nazarin Batsa na SPAN Lab . A gaskiya ma, Psychology Today , a bayyane yake a matsayin martani ga barazanar Prause, a ƙarshe ba a buga ba kawai sukar Wilson game da wannan binciken, har ma da sukar ƙwararru biyu a fagen waɗanda suka rubuta game da raunin binciken.

Daga qarshe, binciken masana da da'awar da aka yi a cikin kafofin watsa labaru an sake nazarin su da kuma yin suka akai-akai ta wasu masana daban-daban da kuma takaddun nazari takwas.: Binciken da aka yi wa matasa Steele et al., 2013

Duk takardun da aka yi wa nazari a kansu sun yi daidai da nazarin Gary Wilson cewa Steele et al. suna goyon bayan tsarin jarabar batsa, kuma Prause ta yi kuskuren fahimtar sakamakon bincikenta ga manema labarai. Iƙirarin Prause guda biyu idan aka kwatanta da ainihin binciken binciken:

1) Yin wasa ya yi iƙirarin cewa batutuwa "ƙwararru ba su amsa kamar sauran 'yan maye ba".

Gaskiya: Binciken bai da wata ƙungiyar kulawa don kwatantawa. Mafi mahimmanci, binciken ya ba da rahoton ƙarin karatun EEG (idan aka kwatanta da hotuna masu tsaka-tsaki) lokacin da aka fallasa mutane ga hotunan batsa na ɗan lokaci. Bincike ya nuna cewa ƙaruwar P300 yana faruwa ne lokacin da masu shan muggan kwayoyi suka fallasa alamun (kamar hotuna) da suka shafi jarabarsu ( duba ƙarin ).

2) Yin wasa ya ba da shawarar cewa batutuwa kawai suna da "sha'awar sha'awar jima'i".

Gaskiya: Dangane da nazarin binciken kwakwalwa na Jami'ar Cambridge , Steele et al. sun ba da rahoton ƙarin amsawar batsa (ƙarin karatu na EEG mafi girma) wanda ke da alaƙa da ƙarancin sha'awar jima'i tare. A wata hanyar - mutanen da ke da ƙarin kunnawar kwakwalwa ga batsa sun fi son yin lalata da batsa fiye da yin jima'i da mutum na gaske. Prause ya yi iƙirarin cewa masu amfani da batsa suna da "babban sha'awa", duk da haka sakamakon binciken ya ce akasin haka: sha'awarsu ta yin jima'i tare tana raguwa dangane da amfani da batsa ( duba ƙarin ).

Da ikirarinta marasa goyon baya da Gary Wilson, John A. Johnson PhD da Don Hilton MD suka fallasa , Prause ta koma yin amfani da fasahar Psychology Today , yin amfani da yanar gizo, da kuma nau'ikan tsoratarwa daban-daban. Har zuwa yau Prause da sauransu suna ci gaba da ambaton aikinta a matsayin "kawar da kai daga fagen daga," ba tare da ambaton ko bayar da wani martani ga duk wani suka na hukuma ba, ban da hare-haren ad hominem da aka kai wa wasu marubutan.

Cikin 'yan kwanaki bayan wallafa sukar Wilson , sunayen masu amfani daban-daban sun fara wallafa tsokaci duk inda sunan Gary Wilson ya bayyana. Sharhin sunaye iri ɗaya ne a cikin abun ciki da sautinsu, suna da'awar ƙarya cewa 1) Wilson bai taɓa koyar da ilimin halittar jiki, ilimin halittar jiki, ilimin halittar jiki ko kuma ya halarci kwaleji ba, 2) Wilson ya saci hotunan wata mata ya sanya su a shafin batsa, 3) Wilson yana da rahoton 'yan sanda da aka shigar a kansa, 4) Wilson ƙwararren mai tausa ne wanda ba shi da aikin yi, 5) An tuhumi Wilson da bin diddigin wata mata talaka, 6) An kai rahoton Wilson ga LAPD, UCLAPD da FBI. Babu wani mai suka Wilson da ya yi irin wannan ikirarin ƙarya kuma har zuwa yau yana ci gaba a cikin tweets da sharhi daga Prause da kuma ta safa da yawa.

Da farko GaryWilson Stalker , GaryWilson IsAFraud , da wasu 'yan tsana na safa sun rubuta rubuce-rubuce da yawa na tsokaci. Misali daga ƙarƙashin tattaunawar TEDx ta Wilson :

Wani misali a ƙarƙashin video na Wilson:

Wani Praise sockpuppet yana gabatar da sharhi akan Psychology Today :

Wani misali:

Wani misali a cikin wata hira da Wilson:

Wani misali a ƙarƙashin jawabin Gary Wilson na TEDx, The Great Porn Experiment :

Iƙirarin da ke sama abin dariya ne, amma ƙaryar da aka yi game da " hotuna da aka sace a shafin batsa ", " an shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda ", " bin diddigin wata mata talaka/masanin kimiyya " da " mai ba da aikin tausa mai warkarwa " sun ɗora wa Prause laifi yayin da mai amfani da yanar gizo ke wallafa sharhin 2013 da kuma sunayen masu amfani da jabu da dama tare da ɗaruruwan sharhi a cikin shekaru 5 masu zuwa. (Lura - Kira ga 'yan sandan Los Angeles da 'yan sandan harabar UCLA sun bayyana babu irin wannan rahoto a cikin tsarinsu.) A ƙasa akwai misali da aka ɗauka daga akwatin saƙo na Wilson na YouTube (7/26/13):

Daga tashar YouTube ta biyu don nuna rediyon Wilson:

Wani misali:

Wani misali:

Wani misali:

Wani misali:

Wani misali:

Wani misali:

Wani misali:

Wani misali:

More ta Nikky:

Kara. Bayanin "RunningBiker" (Fuskantar shine mai gudu, wanda kuma yake hawa babur):

Shawarar kankara game da yadda Prause ke sha'awar yanar gizo ( PDF na sunayen Nicole Prause da ta saba wa cin zarafi da ɓata suna ).

Muhimmin batu: Mai satar bayanai ta yanar gizo da Nicole Prause sun bayyana cewa Wilson "ya sace hotunan wata mace" kuma "yana da rahoton 'yan sanda a fayil ɗin satar waɗannan hotunan." Mutum ɗaya a cikin mutum ɗaya.

1) “Hotunan da aka sata” “a shafin batsa”

Ga gaskiyar lamarin: Gary Wilson ya rubuta wannan rubutun shafin yanar gizo na Psychology Today game da wannan hirar Nicole Prause Psychology Today (wanda ke ɗauke da hoton Prause). Psychology Today ya buƙaci aƙalla hoto ɗaya (duk labaran Wilson's Psychology Today sun ƙunshi hotuna da yawa). Tunda wannan rubutun shafin yanar gizo game da hirar Nicole Prause da kuma nazarin EEG ɗinta, ya yi kama da ya dace a yi amfani da hoton Prause daga gidan yanar gizo na UCLA. An kuma yi amfani da hoton da ya raka rubutun shafin yanar gizo na Psychology Today na Wilson tare da wannan labarin akan YBOP.

Hoton Prause ya fito ne daga abin da Wilson ya ɗauka a matsayin gidan yanar gizo na UCLA - SPAN Lab - kuma a bayyane yake cewa hoton da Prause ta zaɓa don wakiltar kanta ne. Duk abin da ya shafi gidan yanar gizon SPAN Lab ya ba da ra'ayin cewa UCLA ce ta mallaka kuma ke gudanar da shi. A ƙasan kowane shafin SPAN Lab shine kamar haka (Prause kwanan nan ya hana " Injin WayBack na Intanet " nuna shafukan tarihin SPAN Lab, don ɓoye wannan gaskiyar):

Haƙƙin mallaka © 2007-2013 SPAN Lab, An kiyaye dukkan haƙƙoƙi Jami'ar California, Sashen Ilimin Halayyar Dan Adam, Los Angeles , CA 90024

A screenshot na SPAN Lab gaban page daga Agusta, 2013:

Ba a san yadda Prause za ta iya yin iƙirarin haƙƙin mallaka ga wani hoto da ke kan gidan yanar gizo wanda ya yi iƙirarin mallakar haƙƙin mallaka na UCLA ne ba. UCLA wata makaranta ce ta jihar California da ke amsa masu biyan haraji. Wataƙila hotunanta na jama'a ne. Watanni da yawa bayan haka lokacin da Wilson ya rubuta UCLA game da PDF ɗin Prause mai ɓatanci (a ƙasa), UCLA ta bayyana cewa SPAN Lab shine shafin Prause, ba akan sabar UCLA ba (!). Me yasa Prause ta ɓatar da gidan yanar gizon ta a matsayin mallakar UCLA? Wannan shine karo na farko da Wilson ta koyi wannan. Gaskiyar da ba a jayayya ba: Prause ba ta taɓa tuntuɓar Wilson don neman a cire hotonta daga rubutun blog ba. Wilson ta san komai har sai da Prause ta shigar da buƙatar DMCA (a ƙasa) kuma Wilson ta ga hoton ya ɓace daga labarin da ke sukar hirar da Prause ta yi da nazarinta.

To, wannan shine ikirarin "hoton da aka sace": An yi amfani da hoto ɗaya, wanda Prause da kanta ta zaɓa, daga (abin da ya bayyana) gidan yanar gizon dakin gwaje-gwaje na UCLA a cikin wani labarin game da wani bincike da UCLA da Nicole Prause suka buga kuma suka tallata . "Shafin batsa" shine YBOP, wani da'awa da abin dariya ne, domin gidan yanar gizo ne na tallafawa dawo da batsa ba tare da abun ciki mai ƙima na x ba.

Ƙarin Bayani : Prause yanzu tana da'awar a cikin wani PDF na AmazonAWS cewa Wilson ya ƙaura hoton Prause (da labarin da ke da alaƙa) zuwa wasu sabar. Wannan ƙarya ce gaba ɗaya. Hoton Prause tare da sharhi ɗaya da ya bayyana a gidajen yanar gizo guda biyu daban-daban, PornStudySkeptics da YourBrainOnPorn.com . Waɗannan labaran guda biyu iri ɗaya sun ci gaba da kasancewa a waɗannan gidajen yanar gizo guda biyu tun daga Yuli, 2013: Labari na 1 , Labari na 2. A cikin PDF Prause ɗinta kuma ta yi iƙirarin cewa ISP na Wilson ya gaya masa cewa za su "rufe gidan yanar gizon sa idan ya yi shi a karo na huɗu." Wannan ƙarya ce ta ƙirƙira.

2) "an gabatar da rahoton 'yan sanda"

Shekaru sama da 6 kenan kuma 'yan sanda ba su taɓa tuntuɓar Wilson ba (kira ga sashen 'yan sanda na Los Angeles da kuma 'yan sandan harabar UCLA sun nuna babu wani rahoto makamancin haka a tsarinsu). Duk da cewa Prause ta maimaita wannan ikirari mara tushe sau da yawa, amma ta kasa bayyana wa Wilson dokar da ake zargin ta karya. A cikin 2018, ta ƙara da cewa an kai rahoton Wilson sau biyu ga FB I. Me ke gaba, CIA, ICE, Homeland Security… wataƙila ɗan sanda ne? (Ƙarin bayani: Gary Wilson ya shigar da buƙatar 'yancin samun bayanai ga FBI kuma FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Prause yana ƙarya: babu wani rahoto da aka taɓa shigar wa Wilson. Duba - Nuwamba, 2018: FBI ta tabbatar da zamba ta Nicole Prause game da da'awar bata suna )

Shaidun da ke haɗa kai tsaye Yi amfani da waɗannan maganganun marasa tushe game da "hotunan da aka sata" da "rahoton 'yan sanda."

Yi aiki ya aika da DMCA don saukar da hoton ta na SPAN Lab a ranar 21 ga Yuli, 2013 - http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512c/notice.cgi?NoticeID=1091617 kuma uwar garken ya cire shi kafin Wilson ya ga wasikun imel da suka shafi. Wilson ya cire hoton daga wurinsa yayin da aka nemi shi ta hanyar yin rajista na DMCA na biyu, kodayake UCLA, ba Jima'i ba, ya bayyana (kamar yadda zai iya fadawa) ya zama mai mallakar mallaka.
Prause ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter cewa ta shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda kan Wilson (duba bayanan da ke kasa "Yi amfani & Ley kai hari ga NoFap wanda ya kafa Alexander Rhodes“). Kira ga LAPD da 'yan sandan harabar UCLA ba a bayyana irin wannan rahoton a cikin tsarin su ba.
Nicole Prause ta wallafa PDF a kan shafin yanar gizo na SPAN Lab (ƙari a kan wannan a cikin sashe na gaba) tare da duk ƙirar da aka saba da shi da kuma ƙaryar duk abin da ya gabata. Har ila yau, ya yi ƙarya cewa:

"An sami Wilson da laifin satar hotunan wasu mutane"

Kuma, wannan a bayyane yake nuni ne ga hoton da ya biyo bayan rubutun Psychology Today , kuma rubutun Psychology Today game da hirar Prause ne a Psychology Today . Wannan hoton ne da ta zaɓa a saman gidan yanar gizon SPAN Lab ɗinta (wanda ya yi ikirarin cewa shafin UCLA ne).

Don taƙaita Yuli, 2013:

Yawancin maganganun da ke dauke da maganganun ƙarya sun zo kwanaki kaɗan bayan da Wilson ya wallafa Babu wani abu da ya dace da abin da ke cikin SPAN Lab na Sabon Sabon Lissafi.
Yawancin waɗannan maganganun sun yi iƙirarin cewa Wilson “ya yi sata” kuma ya sanya hoton Prause a shafin yanar gizan batsa.
Kada ku taba taba gaya Wilson game da hoton.
Yi aiki ya aika da DMCA ya saukar da hotonta, wanda ya tilasta kamfanin haɓaka YBOP don cire hoton ba tare da fara tuntuɓar Gary Wilson ba.
Irin wannan maganganun marasa tushe suna ci gaba da sanya su har zuwa yau ta hanyar yin amfani da sockpuppets da kuma Prause a shafinta na twitter da Facebook. Abubuwan da aka ambata galibi suna kama da maganganun “marasa sani” na Yuli, 2013 (misalai da yawa a ƙasa da a shafi na 2). PDF na Nicole Prause sunayen laƙabi da ta kasance don musgunawa & ɓata suna

**Wasu - Agusta, 2013: John A. Johnson Faɗakarwa na Dandalin Shari'ar da ake yi game da Steele et al., 2013; Yi wa masu tayar da kisa.**

A daidai lokacin da Prause ke shiga harkar yanar gizo da barazanar ɗaukar mataki na shari'a mara tushe a kan Wilson, ta nemi babban farfesa a fannin ilimin halayyar ɗan adam, John A. Johnson. Prause ta fusata da maganar Johnson cewa mai magana da yawun Prause ta yi iƙirarin da ya yi daidai da ainihin sakamakonta (kamar yadda Wilson ya faɗa). Da take tsokaci a ƙarƙashin hirar Psychology Today ta Nicole Prause, Farfesa John A. Johnson ya yi tsokaci sau biyu:

Raguwa a cikin mahimmanci

An gabatar da shi ta John A. Johnson Ph.D. a ranar 19 ga Yuli, 2013 - 2:35 na yamma

Mustanski yayi tambaya, "Menene manufar binciken?" Kuma Fuskoshin amsa ya ce, "Nazarinmu ya gwada ko mutanen da ke bayar da rahoton irin wadannan matsalolin [matsalolin da suke kallon kallon su na yanar-gizon erotica] suna kama da sauran masu siyaya daga kwakwalwar su ta hanyar zinawa."

Amma bincike bai kwatanta rikodin kwakwalwa daga mutanen da ke da matsalolin da suke kulawa da ra'ayinsu game da labarun yanar gizo ba zuwa ga rikodin kwakwalwa daga magungunan miyagun ƙwayoyi da kuma rikodin kwakwalwa daga wani rukuni na marasa rinjaye, wanda zai zama hanya mai mahimmanci don ganin idan amsawar kwakwalwa daga damuwar rukuni suna kama da kwakwalwar kwakwalwa game da masu siya ko wadanda ba'ayi ba.

Maimakon haka, Magana ya yi iƙirarin cewa zane-zane a ciki shine hanya mafi kyau, inda zancen bincike ya zama jagoran ƙungiyar su. Tare da wannan zane, sun gano cewa amsawar EEG a kan batutuwa (a matsayin ƙungiyoyi) don hotunan hotuna ya fi karfi fiye da yadda EEG ke amsawa ga wasu nau'o'in hotuna. Ana nuna wannan a cikin zane-zane na zane-zane (ko da yake saboda wasu dalilai hoton ya bambanta da yawa daga ainihin zane a cikin labarin da aka buga).

Don haka wannan rukuni wanda ke yin rahoton rashin matsala akan daidaita yadda suke kallon yanar-gizon erotica yana da karfin EEG mai karfi ga hotuna masu ban sha'awa fiye da sauran hotunan. Shin addicts nuna irin wannan karfi EEG kamar yadda aka gabatar tare da miyagun ƙwayoyi na zabi? Ba mu sani ba. Shin al'ada, wadanda ba safiɗa ba su nuna amsar da karfi kamar rukuni na rudani zuwa erotica? Bugu da ƙari, ba mu sani ba. Ba mu san ko wannan tsari na EEG ya fi kama da yanayin kwakwalwa na addicts ko wadanda ba'a yi ba.

Ƙungiyar bincike ta Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa za ta iya nuna ko martanin EEG mai yawa ga waɗanda suka yi jima'i da shi ga batsa martani ne na kwakwalwa mai jaraba ko kuma kawai martanin kwakwalwa mai yawan libido ta hanyar daidaita jerin maki na tambayoyi tare da bambance-bambancen mutum ɗaya a cikin martanin EEG. Amma bayyana bambance-bambance a cikin martanin EEG tambaya ce daban da bincika ko martanin ƙungiyar gabaɗaya ya yi kama da jaraba ko a'a. Ƙungiyar Prause ta ba da rahoton cewa kawai alaƙa mai mahimmanci da aka yi da martanin EEG ita ce alaƙa mara kyau (r = -.33) tare da sha'awar jima'i da abokin tarayya. A takaice dai, akwai ɗan yanayin da mutanen da ke da ƙarfin amsawar EEG ga batsa ke da ƙarancin sha'awar jima'i da abokin tarayya. Ta yaya hakan ke faɗi game da ko martanin kwakwalwa na mutanen da ke da matsala wajen daidaita kallon batsa ya yi kama da masu shan kwayoyi ko waɗanda ba sa shan kwayoyi masu yawan libido?

Watanni biyu bayan haka John Johnson ya buga wannan rubutun blog na ilimin halayyar ɗan adam a yau wanda ya haɗa shi a cikin wani sharhi a ƙarƙashin wannan hirar Prause.

Wataƙila tunanin da aka yi wa Prause ya haifar da ƙarshe akasin sakamakon

An gabatar da shi ta John A. Johnson Ph.D. a ranar 22 ga Satumba, 2013 - 9:00 na dare

Har yanzu hankalina yana kan damuwa game da ikirarin Prause cewa kwakwalwar mutanenta ba ta mayar da martani ga hotunan jima'i ba kamar yadda kwakwalwar masu shan miyagun ƙwayoyi ke mayar da martani ga magungunansu, ganin cewa ta ba da rahoton ƙarin P300 don hotunan jima'i. Kamar masu shan miyagun ƙwayoyi waɗanda ke nuna ƙaruwar P300 lokacin da aka gabatar musu da maganin da suka zaɓa.

Ta yaya za ta iya yanke hukunci wanda ya saba wa ainihin sakamakon? Ina tsammanin hakan na iya faruwa ne saboda tunaninta na farko - abin da take tsammanin zai samu. Na rubuta game da wannan a wani wuri. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/cui-bono/201308/preconceptions-may-color-conclusions-about-sex-addiction

Labarin Johnson: Tunani na Gaba Zai Iya Zama Kammalawa Game da Jarabawar Jima'i . Babban abin da za a yi: A cikin rubutunsa Johnson ya bayyana halayen Prause a bayan fage, kamar barazanar shari'a (kamar yadda ta yi da Wilson) da kuma cin zarafin editocin Psychology Today da barazana, yana tilasta musu su cire rubuce-rubuce biyu na shafin yanar gizo suna sukar ikirarin da Prause ba ta da goyon baya (1 - Sukar Gary Wilson game da " Steele et a l., 2013″ , 2 - sukar Robert Weiss, LCSW & Stefanie Carnes PhD ). Ya kuma bayyana karɓar imel masu tayar da hankali da barazana daga Prause:

Lokacin da na fara ɗaukar wannan rubutun a shafin yanar gizo kuma na fara rubuta shi kimanin wata guda da ya wuce, manufara ta farko ita ce in bayyana dalla-dalla hanyoyin da na ga masu goyon bayan ɓangarorin da ke adawa da muhawarar suna ƙara ko tsawaita muhawararsu fiye da ainihin bayanan da ke cikin binciken. Daga baya na canza ra'ayina lokacin da na lura da wata mummunar magana mai tayar da hankali da ke tasowa tsakanin mahalarta muhawarar. Ba muhawara game da abin da bayanan suka nuna a hankali ba, amma barazanar ad hominem, gami da barazanar ɗaukar mataki na shari'a. Na ga wani rubutu a shafin yanar gizo na PT ya ɓace, a bayyane yake saboda ɗaya daga cikin ɓangarorin ya nemi a cire shi. Har ma na sami wasu imel da suka fusata da kaina saboda ɗaya daga cikin ɓangarorin ya ji cewa na yi tambayoyi game da fassarar da ta dace ta binciken da ake magana a kai a cikin wani dandalin kimiyya.

Don haka, na yanke shawarar fitar da yatsana daga ɗakin a hankali. Na kuma yanke shawarar ci gaba da wallafa abin da na riga na rubuta wata guda da ta wuce, kawai don gabatar da misali na iƙirarin da na yi na cewa kimiyya ba wani abu ne da aka yi niyya ba, kuma masana kimiyya na gaske na iya shiga cikin aikinsu da kansu da kuma motsin rai. Wannan cece-kucen da ake yi shi ma kyakkyawan misali ne na wani yanayi da masu bincike na Amurka ke yawan kimanta sakamakon kimiyya mai laushi.

Wannan ya fusata Prause wanda ya yi jayayya (ta amfani da sunayen karya) da Johnson a cikin sashin sharhi na rubutunsa na Psychology Today game da binciken EEG na Prause na 2013 (lura cewa Johnson ba shi da ra'ayi game da jarabar jima'i). Wasu hotunan allo na sockpuppet na Prause wanda ke kwatanta Wilson kamar yadda take yi koyaushe: karya, zamba, mai ilimin tausa mara aiki:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/comment/565636#comment-565636

-----------

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/comment/566638#comment-566638

-----------

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/comment/571871#comment-571871

-----------

Nuwamba 2013: Yi amfani da wurare masu kyauta a kan shafin yanar gizon SPAN Lab. Maƙallan abun ciki "ƙaƙƙarfan magana" a cikin yanar gizo

A watan Nuwamba na 2013, Nicole Prause ta sanya PDF a shafinta na SPAN Lab (URL da aka yi watsi da shi tun lokacin da wani kamfanin sextoy ya saya!) ta kai hari ga Gary Wilson (hoton allo a ƙasa). Ya ƙunshi misalai da yawa na ɓata suna. Abubuwan da ke cikin PDF ɗin sun yi kama da ɗaruruwan wasu tsokaci waɗanda aka buga ta hanyar sunayen masu amfani daban-daban. GaryWilson Stalker , GaryWilson IsAFraud da sauran 'yan tsana na safa ne suka rubuta rubuce-rubucen. Irin waɗannan tsokaci sun ci gaba har zuwa yau a kan dandamali daban-daban na murmurewa da sauran wurare, waɗanda aka buga tare da wasu sunayen masu amfani ( PDF na sunayen Nicole Prause da ta saba wa cin zarafi & ɓata suna ).

Idan har akwai wani shakku game da ainihin wanda ke bayan waɗannan maganganun, PDF ɗin ya kawo ƙarshensa. Gary Wilson ya tuntubi UCLA don ya ba da rahoton maganganun ɓatancin na PDF, tunda har yanzu ya yi imanin cewa SPAN Lab gidan yanar gizon UCLA ne (a lokacin, haƙƙin mallakar SPAN Labarin mallakar UCLA ne kuma adireshin yana cikin ginin UCLA). UCLA ta yarda da kasancewar PDF, da cire ta daga baya a cikin wasiƙa. Adireshinsa shine - https://pornstudycritiques.com/nicole-prause-cyberstalking-and-harassing-gary-wilson-others/.

Ta yaya Gary Wilson ya gano abin da ke sama? An tura hanyar bincike na Intanet dinsa zuwa PDF lokacin da ya ziyarci gidan yanar gizo na SPAN (yana wakiltar kansa azaman gidan yanar gizon UCLA). Sanin adireshin IP na Wilson, Fuskantarwa ya zama al'ada ta tura turawar Intanet na Intanet zuwa wasu URLs, kamar shafukan batsa ko hotunan azabtarwa. Wannan ya fara ne kafin PDF ya bayyana, kuma ya ci gaba bayan an cire PDF. Evidencearin shaidar da ke nuna cewa Mai yiwuwa mai yiwuwa ne ke da alhakin abubuwan da ke faruwa a yanar gizo (kawai ɗan ƙaramin abin da ke cikin wannan shafin). Misali, PDFs guda biyu wadanda suke dauke da abubuwa kusan iri daya da na kyauta mai dadi na PDF an loda su a kan DocStoc 'yan kwanaki bayan Wilson ya wallafa sukar sa na Nazarin 2013 EEG na Prause:

Sabanin ikirarin “takaddun” ba su nuna komai ba, sai dai cewa Prause shine mutumin da ya buga duka PDFs. Wilson ya yi kuka ga UCLA game da ladabi na PDF. UCLA amsa:

SABUNTARWA: Da farko, Prause ta yi amfani da sunayen masu amfani na bogi da dama don yin rubutu a dandalin murmurewa daga batsa , Quora , Wikipedia , da kuma sassan sharhi a ƙarƙashin labarai. Prause ba ta yi amfani da ainihin sunanta ko asusunta na sada zumunta ba. Duk wannan ya canza bayan da UCLA ta zaɓi kada ta sabunta kwangilar Prause (kusan Janairu, 2015).

Ba da damar yin la'akari da aiki yanzu ba, in ji Prause magoya bayanan kafofin watsa labarai biyu daga Media 2 × 3 ga kamfanonin 'yan kasuwa na kamfanin "masu haɗin gwiwar." Ayyukansu shi ne sanya rubutun a cikin latsa yana nuna Prause (duba slicker anan), kuma ta same ta magana shawarwari a cikin wuraren wasan kwaikwayo da kuma wuraren da suka dace. Tsarin hali na wani masanin kimiyya marar bambanci.

Gunaguni ya fara sanya sunansa zuwa ga ƙarya, da ke fitowa da yanar-gizon mutane masu yawa da kungiyoyi akan kafofin watsa labarai da kuma sauran wurare. Tun lokacin da aka yi amfani da Prause a matsayin Gary Wilson (daruruwan kafofin watsa labarun kafofin watsa labarun tare da bayan bayanan lambobin imel), ya zama wajibi ne don saka idanu da kuma rubutun tweets da posts. An yi haka ne domin kare lafiyarta, kuma yana da mahimmanci ga duk wani mataki na doka.

Ba da daɗewa ba ya zama fili cewa tweets da sharhi na Prause sun kasance da wuya game da bincike da jima'i, ko kuma wani nau'in batun da ya dace da ita. A gaskiya ma, yawancin wuraren da aka yi wa Prause za su iya raba kashi biyu:

Batanci & ad hominem maganganun da suka shafi mutane da kungiyoyi da ta kira "masu gwagwarmaya" (sau da yawa suna ikirarin zama wanda aka azabtar da wadannan mutane da kungiyoyi).
Goyan bayan masana'antun batsa:
- goyon bayan kai tsaye ga FSC (Jagoran Bayanai na Musamman), AVN (Adult Video Network), masu sauti, masu wasan kwaikwayon, da abubuwan da suka dace
- asarar rashin fahimta game da binciken batsa da kuma hare-haren da ake yi akan batsa ko kuma masu binciken batsa

Wannan shafin ya ƙunshi samfurin tweets da sharhi da suka shafi #2 - goyon bayanta mai ƙarfi ga masana'antar batsa da matsayin da aka zaɓa. Bayan shekaru da yawa na zama kan shaidar, YBOP tana da ra'ayin cewa zaluncin Prause na gefe ɗaya ya ƙaru zuwa irin wannan ɓata suna da yawa da rashin kulawa (tana zarginta da yawa waɗanda abin ya shafa da "bin diddiginta ta zahiri," "ƙiyayya," "ƙarfafa wasu su yi mata fyaɗe," da "zama 'yan Nazi"), wanda hakan ya tilasta mana mu bincika dalilan da za su iya sa ta yi hakan. An raba shafin zuwa manyan sassa 4:

Disamba, 2013: Tweet na farko tweet game da Wilson & CBC: "RealScience" posts guda ƙarya da'awar a rana guda a kan mahara yanar

A ranar 18 ga Disamba, 2013, sakon farko da Nicole Prause ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter ya shafi Gary Wilson da wata hira da CBC. Ba za mu iya danganta sakon da Twitter ba domin an dakatar da asusun Twitter na Prause na asali har abada saboda cin zarafin Todd Love, PsyD, JD, wanda bitarsa kan adabin ta yi ƙarfin halin sukar aikinta (karin bayani a ƙasa). Asalin adireshin Twitter na Prause shine https://twitter.com/NicolePrause/ . Idan kuna da sha'awa, za ku iya karanta martanin Wilson ga CBC a nan.

A ranar 18 da 19 ga Disamba, "RealScience" ko "RealScientist" sun buga wasu maganganu makamantan haka, masu ɓatarwa a shafukan yanar gizo waɗanda suka ambaci Gary Wilson. ( PDF na sunayen Nicole Prause da ta saba wa cin zarafi da ɓata suna ). Wa kuma banda Prause zai iya ɗaukar alhakin waɗannan rubuce-rubucen, waɗanda suka ɓata musayar bayanai da CBC da martanin da ta mayar wa Wilson? Misalai kaɗan, inda Prause ba wai kawai game da CBC ba ne, har ma da takardun shaidara, ilimina, da darussan da na koya:

-----

————————————————

-----------

------------

--------------

----------

----------

----------

A kan Quora, ta amfani da ɗaya daga cikin sunayen laƙabi da yawa. Daga baya an dakatar da ita daga Quora har abada saboda cin zarafi da ɓata sunan Gary Wilson: Maris 5, 2018 - An dakatar da yin amfani da Kalma har abada daga Quora saboda cin zarafin Gary Wilson

----------

Yi amfani da rubutu a dandalin murmurewa na batsa YourBrainRebalanced (YBR), ta amfani da suna banda "RealScience" (Yi amfani da rubutu sau da yawa akan YBR , yana cin zarafin maza a cikin murmurewa da ɓata sunan Gary Wilson , Gabe Deem da tsohon abokin aikin UCLA Rory Reid )

---------

Tweeting game da CBC (ta amfani da sabon asusun twitter) a cikin 2016 da ba da da'awar cewa Wilson ya yi barazanar CBC.

----------

A sashe na gaba, Prause ("RealScience") ta wallafa bidiyonta na CBC akan dandalin murmurewa na batsa YourBrainRebalanced, kuma ta tambayi Gary Wilson game da girman azzakarinsa . Prause ta canza amsar Wilson ga tambayar azzakarinta (inda ya rubuta "Miss" Prause ba da gangan ba) zuwa wani kamfen da ke ɓata sunan Wilson da matarsa a matsayin masu son ɓata suna. Ba wasa ba ne.

Disamba 2013: Yi amfani da sakonni akan YourBrainRebalanced & ya tambayi Gary Wilson game da girman sa azzakari (ƙaddamar da yakin neman kiran kiran Wilson da matarsa misogynists)

Kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin sashe na baya, a ranar 18 ga Disamba, 2013 Prause ta shiga wani mummunan hari ta yanar gizo, tana wallafa karyarta game da abubuwan da suka faru na CBC a kan dandali inda sunan Gary Wilson ya bayyana. Ta amfani da sunayen karya, Prause sau da yawa tana yin amfani da dandali na murmurewa na batsa tana ambaton kimiyyar batsa ko kuma cin zarafin membobin da ke ƙoƙarin warkar da jaraba ko ED da batsa ya haifar. A cikin sharhinta na CBC akan YourBrainRebalanced Prause (kamar RealScience) ta tambayi Wilson: "Yaya ƙanƙantar azzakarinka Gary? ".

Hoton hoton da ke sama, tare da amsar Gary Wilson inda ya rubuta " Miss Prause " ba da gangan ba don amsa tambayar matasa game da azzakarinsa , shine "shaida" da ake zaton Prause ta yi amfani da shi cewa Gary Wilson mai son batsa ne. A nan Prause ta wallafa wani sigar sharhin "RealScience" mai wahalar karantawa a shafinta na Twitter:

Ga wani babban sigar hoton da ta saka a cikin sakon Twitter da ke sama. Haɗi zuwa cikakken amsar Wilson . Prause ne ke nuna wariyar jinsi yayin da Prause ya tambayi Gary Wilson game da girman azzakarinsa:

Ko ta yaya, Prause ya canza salo na Wilson ba da gangan ba "a ɓoye" a cikin amsoshin ta ga tambayoyin da ta yi game da samanta a cikin ta ba ta taɓa ƙare kamfen don fenti Wilson ba, wasu kuma a matsayin masu ƙiba. Da ke ƙasa akwai misalai kaɗan na yadda Prause ta yi amfani da mummunan fata game da azzakarin Gary Wilson da amsar sa.

A cikin 'yan shekarun nan, da alama Dr. Prause ta ɗauki matakai masu yawa don ta sanya kanta a matsayin "mace da ake azabtar da ita idan ta faɗi gaskiya ga iko." Sau da yawa tana aika saƙonnin da ke tafe a shafinta na Twitter waɗanda a bayyane suke suna rabawa a laccocinta na jama'a, suna nuna cewa ana cin zarafinta "a matsayinta na mace masanin kimiyya," kuma tana zana kanta a matsayin mai bin diddigin abubuwan da ke faruwa don tabbatar da rashin lahani na batsa duk da hare-haren nuna wariya.

Yana zargin Wilson, Marnia Robinson, Don Hilton MD, da kuma wanda ya kafa kamfanin Alexander Rhodes na misogyny. Duk wata shawara cewa Wilson (ko matarsa), Hilton, ko Rhodes suna motsawa ta hanyar misogyny, saboda ƙullun su ba su da dangantaka da Dokta Prause a matsayin mutum ko mace, kuma kawai ya yi da maganganunta marasa gaskiya da rashin dacewarsa goyon bayan da'awar game da bincike.

Dangane da Infographic, shaidar da Prause ta bayar game da nuna wariya ita ce Wilson ya taɓa rubuta "Miss Prause" ba da gangan ba. Shi ke nan. Iƙirarin da ta yi cewa Marnia Robinson mai nuna wariya ce abin dariya ne. Iƙirarin da ta yi cewa Don Hilton MD ta kira ta mai lalata da yara wani ƙarya ne, kamar yadda wannan sashe ya bayyana . Ta kira Alexander Rhodes mai nuna wariya saboda ya yi ƙarfin halin cewa Wilson ba ya 'bin diddiginta' - duk da haka ita ce mai aikata laifin, tana cin zarafin samari waɗanda suka warke daga matsalolin jima'i da batsa ta haifar.

A ƙarshe, yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa marubucin Nicole Farko yana dangantaka ta kusa da masana'antar batsa kuma ya damu da debunking PIED, tunda ya yi za a Yakin yaki na 3 da wannan takarda, yayin tare da cin zarafi da lalata samari waɗanda suka murmure daga lalatawar lalata ta lalata. Duba takardu: Gabe Deem #1, Gabe Deem #2, Alexander Rhodes #1, Alexander Rhodes #2, Alexander Rhodes #3, Nuhu Ikilisiya, Alexander Rhodes #4, Alexander Rhodes #5, Alexander Rhodes #6, Alexander Rhodes #7, Alexander Rhodes #8, Alexander Rhodes #9, Alexander Rhodes #10, Alex Rhodes # 11, Gabe Deem & Alex Rhodes tare # 12, Alexander Rhodes #13, Alexander Rhodes #14, Gabe Deem #4, Alexander Rhodes #15.

A taqaice, duk wanda ya tona asirin Prausei na karya ko kuma bayyana bayanan binciken to ya zama mai kin yarda. Tana yin hakan ne don rufe ainihin muhawara a shafin twitter da sauran kafofin dandalin sada zumunta, don hana yada labaran karyarta. Yayi aiki, don haka ta ci gaba da ɓatarwa.

Abin mamaki ne cewa bayananta sun ƙunshi misalai huɗu na nuna wariya daga sharhin YouTube da ba a san ko su waye ba a ƙarƙashin tattaunawar TEDx ɗinta. A cikin 2013, TED ta rufe sharhi a ƙarƙashin jawabin Gary Wilson na TEDx don mayar da martani ga maganganun ƙiyayya da ɓatanci da Nicole Prause ta yi ( duba wannan sashe ). Prause ta yi amfani da waɗannan sunayen masu amfani guda biyu na YouTube don wallafa sharhinta:

Wadannan tweets din sune misalai na wasan kwaikwayon da suke nunawa cikin misogyny da kuma tura mata "kowa yasan misogynist infographic". Lura: Yin wasa bai taɓa ba da misali guda ɗaya na tabbaci ba game da kasancewarta wanda aka kaiwa hari na sirri ko misogyny (tabbas ba wanda ta ambata ba). Duk farfaganda ce. Abin baƙin ciki da yawa sun gaskata ƙaryarta.

Gwadawa na neman duk wani damar da za a iya aikawa ta shafin yanar gizo:

-----

-----

------

-----

Ba ta taba samar da wani abu da aka rubuta ba akan wani abu da ya tashi daga FTND. a gefe guda kuma Prause ya shiga game da abubuwa na musamman na 100 da cin zarafin da aka yi wa FTND. Dubi wadannan sassan don cikakkun yawa:

------

------

------

Hare-hare a Cibiyar Gottman - duk saboda Gottman ya buga wani labarin da ke nuna cewa " batsa na iya cutar da dangantakar ma'aurata ."

------

Karya game da labarin Gottman :

Labaran sun kasance har yanzu.
Abubuwan da ke faruwa a kan jima'i a kan ma'aurata suna da mummunan korau.

Sama da bincike 60 sun danganta amfani da batsa da ƙarancin gamsuwar jima'i da dangantaka . Kamar yadda muka sani, duk wani bincike da ya shafi maza ya ba da rahoton ƙarin amfani da batsa da ke da alaƙa da rashin gamsuwar jima'i ko dangantaka. Yayin da wasu bincike suka haɗa da ƙarin amfani da batsa ga mata da gamsuwar jima'i mafi kyau (ko tsaka tsaki), yawancinsu ba su yi ba (duba wannan jerin: Nazarin batsa da ya shafi mata: Tasirin da ba su dace ba kan sha'awar jima'i, gamsuwar jima'i, da dangantaka ).

-------

Da'awar cewa "mai son yin lalata da yara Gary Wilson" ya yi mata barazana, amma bai taɓa ba da misali ba.

An yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa akwai "ɗaruruwan karatu" da suka saɓa wa illolin batsa - amma za a iya kawo misalai guda 5 na binciken da aka zaɓa da aka bayyana a nan.

------

An ambaci waɗannan kalmomi: Kohut et al., 2017. Duba Sharhin "Shin Da Gaske ne Batsa ke Nuna Ƙiyayya ga Mata? Masu Amfani da Batsa Suna da Halayen Daidaito Tsakanin Jinsi Fiye da Marasa Amfani a cikin Misalin Wakili na Amurka" (2016), Taylor Kohut, Jodie L. Baer, Brendan Watts

Ta yaya Taylor Kohut ya sami nasarar cimma sakamakonsa na rashin kyau? Bincikensa ya tsara daidaito a matsayin: (1) Tallafi ga zubar da ciki, (2) Bayyana mata, (3) Mata masu riƙe da mukamai, (4) Imani cewa rayuwar iyali tana wahala lokacin da mace ke da aiki na cikakken lokaci., kuma abin mamaki (5) Riƙe ra'ayoyi marasa kyau game da iyali na gargajiya. Al'umma marasa addini, waɗanda galibi suke da sassaucin ra'ayi, suna da yawan amfani da batsa fiye da al'ummomin addini. Ta hanyar zaɓar waɗannan sharuɗɗan da kuma yin watsi da wasu canje-canje marasa iyaka, babban marubucin Taylor Kohut ya san zai ƙare da masu amfani da batsa waɗanda suka fi samun maki a kan sharuɗɗan da bincikensa ya zaɓa a hankali na abin da ya ƙunshi "daidaituwa." Sannan ya zaɓi taken da ya juya komai.

Gaskiya: kusan kowace bincike da aka buga yana danganta amfani da batsa da ra'ayoyin mata masu nuna wariya ga mata ko kuma "ra'ayoyin mata marasa daidaito". Duba nazarin mutum ɗaya - sama da bincike 25 sun haɗa amfani da batsa da "ra'ayoyin mata marasa daidaito" ga mata da ra'ayoyin mata masu nuna wariya ga mata - ko kuma taƙaitaccen bayani daga wannan nazarin meta na 2016: Kafofin Watsa Labarai da Jima'i: Yanayin Bincike na Tarihi, 1995–2015 . An ƙara:

Makasudin wannan bita shine ya hada da bincike na jarrabawar gwajin gwagwarmayar jarida. An mayar da hankali ne a kan bincike da aka buga a cikin mujallolin wallafa-wallafe-wallafa, wallafe-wallafen harshen Turanci tsakanin 1995 da 2015. An kammala nazarin 109 da ke dauke da nazarin 135. Binciken da aka bayar yana nuna shaida cewa daukan labarun dakin gwaje-gwaje da na yau da kullum, shafukan yau da kullum a cikin wannan abun ciki suna da alaƙa da wasu sakamakon, ciki har da ƙananan matakan rashin jin daɗin jiki, ƙwarewar kai-da-kai, goyon baya ga bangaskiyar jima'i da kuma rikice-rikice na jima'i. Ƙarfin haɗari da jima'i ga mata. Bugu da ƙari, gwagwarmayar gwaji ga wannan abun ciki yana jagoranci mata da maza don samun fahimtar ra'ayi game da karfin mata, halin kirki, da bil'adama.

------

Kira PornHelp.org dan damfara don wallafa shafin yanar gizo:

------

A sama kwance fallasa a nan:

------

Ta tara abokantaka don misogyny na ba da gangan ta amfani da Miss, lokacin da amsa tambayoyin game da azzakari:

-------

Jaridar Daily Beast ta buga wani labari mai batanci ga kamfanin hulda da jama'a mai tsada na Prause :

Babu wanda ya ce sunyi amfani da riba daga masana'antun masana'antu.

-------

Duk wanda ya kira Kiɗa a kan bincike ana kiransa malami:

-------

Yi wa'adin ikirarin sun kammala digiri daga shirin neuro mafi girma. Cibiyar Kinsey ba shirin ba ne na neuro ba.

GABATARWA: Yin wasa yanzu yana kwance game da abin da na faɗi cewa Cibiyar Kinsey ba ta ɗaya daga cikin manyan shirye-shiryen neuroscience ba. Kamar yadda kuka gani, tana da'awar na ce ba ta da PhD kuma Kinsey ba ta bayar da PhD ba. Dabara ta al'ada - dogaro da mabiyan ta rashin karanta hotunan kariyar ta.

LURA: Rahoton Labaran Amurka & Duniya bai lissafa Cibiyar Kinsey a matsayin babban shiri ba - Mafi kyawun Jami'o'in Duniya don Ilimin Jiki da Halayya.

------

Gary Wilson shine sanannen misogynist

------

Yi amfani da labaranta ta YBR, yana tambayar Wilson game da azabarsa, a matsayin shaida na misogyny:

-------

Guy ya sake tambaya, Gwadawa yayi maimaita kanta:

Babu gargadi.

-------

Yi amfani da hargitsi Staci Sprout a twitter, kira Wilson wani misogynist:

Prause ta ci gaba da cin zarafin Sprout kuma ta shigar da koke-koke guda 3 na bogi (waɗanda aka yi watsi da su gaba ɗaya) ga hukumomin gwamnati. Duba: Wasu - Prause ta shigar da koke-koke marasa tushe ga Jihar Washington game da mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout

-------

Yi amfani da tweets game da labarun Quora bayan da ya kira Wilson da sauran masu misogynists

An haramta wa Prause shiga gasar har abada saboda cin zarafin Wilson: Maris 5, 2018 - An haramta wa Wilson shiga gasar har abada saboda cin zarafin Gary Wilson

------

Wani ɗan uwan PhD, yana rashin lafiya game da maganganun Prause, ya nemi ta faranta, don Allah lakafta shi a matsayin mai lalata. Tana yi.

------

Koma yin kira akan kimiyya, ya kira mutumin misogynist

-----

Har yanzu tweeting wani hoto mara kyau game da ita yana tambayar Wilson game da azzakari…. kiran shi misogynists:

-----

Ta ce "karin hare-haren jima'i", amma ba ta taɓa ba da rubutaccen misali ba:

-----

Da'awar wanda aka zalunta, amma babu takardu :

-------

Yanzu dai tana jin cewa mahaukaci suna gudana a ko'ina

------

Da'awar zama mai azabtarwa, amma ita ne mai gabatarwa:

------

Kira Mata United sexist:

------------

Yi wa'adin ikirarin da ake azabtar da shi, amma bai taba yin wani takardun shaida ba

-------

Nope. Dukkan abin da aka kirkiro wanda aka azabtar, ba misalai:

------

Back da fitar tare da ta batsa star buddy:

------

Zane kanta a matsayin wanda aka azabtar ba tare da tsoro ba, alhali kuwa ita ce mai aikata laifin :

------

Zanen kanta a matsayin wanda aka azabtar, lokacin da ta zama dan wasa

------

Tattaunawa tare da abokiyar sauti ta hoton, yadda ta ke da wanda aka azabtar:

------

Ƙari game da wannan ƙarya:

------

Mai magana da yawun 'yan gwagwarmayar kare hakkin dan-Adam ne masanin jima'i, amma masu kallon batsa ba.

Yana da kyau. An ambaci: Kohut et al., 2017. Duba Sharhin "Shin Da gaske ne batsa yana nufin yin ƙiyayya ga mata? Masu amfani da batsa suna da halaye mafi daidaito tsakanin jinsi fiye da waɗanda ba sa amfani da su a cikin wani samfurin wakilcin Amurka" (2016), Taylor Kohut, Jodie L. Baer, Brendan Watts

Gaskiya: kusan kowace bincike da aka buga yana danganta amfani da batsa da ra'ayoyin mata masu nuna wariya ga mata ko kuma "ra'ayoyin mata marasa daidaito". Duba nazarin mutum ɗaya - sama da bincike 40 sun haɗa amfani da batsa da "ra'ayoyin mata marasa daidaito" ga mata da ra'ayoyin mata masu nuna wariya ga mata - ko kuma taƙaitaccen bayani daga wannan nazarin meta na 2016: Kafofin Watsa Labarai da Jima'i: Yanayin Bincike na Tarihi, 1995–2015 . An ƙara:

Makasudin wannan bita shine ya hada da bincike na jarrabawar gwajin gwagwarmayar jarida. An mayar da hankali ne a kan bincike da aka buga a cikin mujallolin wallafa-wallafe-wallafa, wallafe-wallafen harshen Turanci tsakanin 1995 da 2015. An kammala nazarin 109 da ke dauke da nazarin 135. Binciken da aka bayar yana nuna shaida cewa daukan labarun dakin gwaje-gwaje da na yau da kullum, shafukan yau da kullum a cikin wannan abun ciki suna da alaƙa da wasu sakamakon, ciki har da ƙananan matakan rashin jin daɗin jiki, ƙwarewar kai-da-kai, goyon baya ga bangaskiyar jima'i da kuma rikice-rikice na jima'i. Ƙarfin haɗari da jima'i ga mata. Bugu da ƙari, gwagwarmayar gwaji ga wannan abun ciki yana jagoranci mata da maza don samun fahimtar ra'ayi game da karfin mata, halin kirki, da bil'adama.

-------

Ƙarin da'awar nuna wariya, ba ainihin misali ba ne.

------

Abin haushi ne cewa an kira ta Miss sau ɗaya, lokacin da take so ƙarin bayani game da azzakarin Wilson.

------

Ya kawo wa abokanta, Ley da Miller.

Masu cin zarafin suna da'awar ɗaukar hoto.

-------

Ƙari kamar haka:

------

Jumlar da ta dace: “binciken jima'i & tsinkaye” - amma ba su san cewa Yin amfani da yanar gizo shine cyber-stalker ba:

------

Ƙarin da'awa game da "masu fafutukar batsa", amma ba ainihin misali ba ne :

-------

Gabatar da karairayinta game da "hare-haren kin-kimiyya" a wajen taro

------

Gabatar da maganganun ƙarya iri ɗaya a ɗalibanta - Cibiyar Kinsey

------

Ƙarin game da ita Kinsey magana.

-------

David Ley (Kwallon kafa) ya goyi bayan tarihinta:

------

Harkokin misogyny yana nuna hamayya da ita da'awar:

Yin aiki a fili ya furta cewa duk wanda ya gaskata cewa batsa na iya zama cutarwa ko jaraba shi ne misogynist. Kowane mutum guda:

------

Yi amfani da duk wata dama da za a yi da'awar ɗaukar hoto.

Babu wani misali.

-------

Iƙirarin cewa tarurrukanta suna faruwa ne a ɓoye saboda cin zarafi:

Misali ɗaya tilo da ta taɓa bayarwa shine Gary Wilson. Ba ta da wata hujja, domin ƙarya take yi. Duba - Oktoba, 2016 - Prause ta sa mai gabatarwa Susan Stiritz ta "yi wa 'yan sandan harabar jami'a gargaɗi" cewa Gary Wilson zai iya tashi mil 2000 don sauraron Prause yana cewa jarabar batsa ba gaskiya ba ce

-------

Ba da'awar kai hare-hare ba bisa ƙa'ida ba - babu wani misali da aka rubuta

-------

Statesarya ya faɗi cewa waɗanda ke nuna rashin yarda game da “jarabar batsa” masanan ne, waɗanda ke tsoron firgita:

A zahiri - wannan jerin ya ƙunshi bita da sharhin adabi guda 25 na baya-bayan nan daga wasu manyan masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi a duniya. Duk suna goyon bayan tsarin jaraba.

------

Wannan tsohuwar ƙaryar da aka yi game da '' yan kwalliya ”

Lura: Prause ta bayyana sau da yawa cewa ta kai rahoton Gary Wilson da Alexander Rhodes ga FBI saboda "bin diddiginsu" . Tabbas, ƙarya take yi, kamar yadda FBI, LAPD, da UCLAPD suka fallasa:

---------

David Ley yana goyon bayanta:

------

Ƙarin farfaganda

------

Komawa daga abokin Josh Grubbs - Wilson "mai saurin bin misogynistic ne"

Daga baya ta yi iƙirarin sau 30,000, sannan sau 80,000. Duk ƙarya ne. Duba - Wasu - Oktoba, 2018: An yi iƙirarin ƙarya a cikin wani tweet cewa sunanta ya bayyana sama da sau 35,000 akan YBOP

Ta kuma nuna cewa Wilson ya yi barazanar kashe ta.

Babu shakka kwayoyi. Haka kuma, idan tana da ainihin abin misali, za ta samar da ita. Idan da gaske ne da za ta kai rahoto ga ’yan sanda Wilson. Amma LAPD da FBI sun ce ba ta da:

------

Wanda aka kai wa hare-hare kan bincike "ta hanyar masu gwagwarmaya"

Ba wai kawai waɗanda ake kira 'yan gwagwarmaya ba, akwai ƙararraki 18 na takardun nata a cikin wallafe-wallafen nazarin ɗan adam:

Steele et al. 2013: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Yi amfani da al al. 2015: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Yi amfani & Pfaus, 2015: Binciken ɗan jarrabawa game da Yi amfani & Pfaus, 2015 - by Richard A. Isenberg MD.

------

Bugu da ƙari, ayyukan ƙazanta ta "masu gwagwarmaya". Amma ayyukan ba a taɓa suna ba kuma ba ta taɓa ba da shaida ga aiki ɗaya ba:

------

Yada labarinta

-------

Yin amfani da alaƙa yana yada ƙarya cewa tana da umarnin hana Gary Wilson. Wannan banza ya rufe a sassa da yawa na wannan shafin.

-------

Tambayoyin da suka gabata suna wakiltar ƙarshen dusar ƙanƙara ta Prause ta hanyar lalata ta.

Mayu 2014: Dabbobi masu yawa da yawa suna bayan bayanai a kan YourBrainRebalanced.com cewa kawai Amfani zasu san (wasu misalai)

Ranar da aka buga binciken Max Planck kan masu amfani da batsa (wanda ke nuna cewa amfani da batsa na iya samun tasirin da za a iya aunawa a kwakwalwa), sunayen laƙabi guda huɗu waɗanda suka haɗa da, " txfba", "touif" da "TrickyPaladin" sun buga kusan tsokaci 100 akan YourBrainRebalanced.com . (PDF na sunayen laƙabi na Nicole Prause da ta saba yi wa cin zarafi & ɓata suna ). Abin da ya rage daga cikin maganganunsu yana cikin wannan zaren , yayin da troll ya share maganganunta cikin 'yan awanni. Yawancin maganganun touif da TrickyPaladin ko dai kai hari ne ga Wilson ko kuma cikakkun bayanai na binciken EEG na Prause na 2013. Ga wasu misalai kaɗan da wayar salula ta memba na YBR ta kama inda TrickyPaladin da touif suka yi cikakken bayani game da Steele et al ., 2013 waɗanda mutane kaɗan ne kawai za su iya samarwa (kuma Prause ne kawai zai damu da su):

----

Zan tambaya, wa (banda Prause kanta) zai san cikakkun bayanai game da wani bincike mai rikitarwa na EEG da kyau don ƙoƙarin kare shi, ko kuma yana son yin rubutu sau 100 akan dandalin murmurewa na batsa don kare shi? (Idan kun damu da karanta sharhin da ke sama, ku sani cewa duk wani irin wannan ikirarin an wargaza shi ta wannan sharhi mai zurfi , da takardu 8 da aka yi wa bita na takwarorinsu: Sukar da aka yi wa takwarorinsu na Steele et al. , 2013 )

Duk da yake Tricky (da sauran 'yan tsana na safa) sun goge mafi yawan maganganunta, ta bar wasu kaɗan suna kwatanta "babi da Prause ba ta buga ba tukuna" wanda ake zargin yana ba da tarihin munanan ayyukan Gary Wilson:

Wa zai san cikakkun bayanai game da babi da ba a buga ba ta Prause? Sharhin da ke sama ya fito ne daga watan Mayu, 2014. Babi na "mai zuwa" na Prause an buga shi watanni 8 bayan haka a cikin wannan littafin - " Sabbin Ra'ayoyi Kan Batsa: Jima'i, Siyasa, da Doka. " Tabbas, Prause ba ta bayyana Wilson a cikin babin ba, domin ikirarinta na "abubuwa masu ban tsoro" ƙarya ne kawai.

Wasu ƙarin sunayen laƙabi na Prause da aka yi amfani da su akan YourBrainRebalanced.com (wasu kuma masu gudanarwa sun share su da sauri).

ERT (an goge shi, allo a ciki wannan sashe)
Gaskiya
XX-XX
Gaskiya

Kamar yadda aka ambata, 'yan tsana masu buga sharhi irin na Prause suna ci gaba har zuwa yau a shafukan dawo da batsa kamar reddit/pornfree da reddit/nofap. Tun daga farko Prause yana da wata dabi'a ta musamman ta ƙirƙirar sunayen masu amfani da yawa daga kalmomi 2-4 masu manyan haruffa (misali GaryWilsonStalker ). Duk da cewa 'yan tsana masu saƙa galibi suna share sunayen masu amfani da tsokaci, wasu misalai da ke ɗauke da abun ciki sun kasance (duk an ƙirƙira su ne kawai don maganganun kamar na Prause, sannan a yi watsi da su nan take):

https://www.reddit.com/user/SexMythBusters
https://www.reddit.com/user/ReadMoreAndMore
https://www.reddit.com/user/HeartInternetPorn
https://www.reddit.com/user/FightPower
https://www.reddit.com/user/DallasLandia
https://www.reddit.com/user/CupOJoe2010
https://www.reddit.com/user/GaryWilsonPervert
https://www.reddit.com/user/GaryWilsonSteas
https://www.reddit.com/user/PenisAddict
https://www.reddit.com/user/DataScienceLA
https://www.reddit.com/user/AskingForProof
https://www.reddit.com/user/JumpinJackFlashZ0oom
https://www.reddit.com/user/fappygirlmore
https://www.reddit.com/user/locuspocuspenisless
https://www.reddit.com/user/ijdfgo
https://www.reddit.com/user/vnwpwejfb
https://www.reddit.com/user/alahewakbear
https://www.reddit.com/user/gjacwo
http://www.reddit.com/user/SearchingForTruthNot (Account now deleted)
http://www.reddit.com/user/DontDoDallas (Account now deleted)
http://www.reddit.com/user/HighHorseNotOn (Account now deleted)
http://www.reddit.com/user/SoManyMalts (Account now deleted)
https://www.reddit.com/user/TruthWithOut (Account now deleted)
https://www.reddit.com/user/sinwvon (Account now deleted)
https://www.reddit.com/user/RevealingAll (Account now deleted)
https://www.reddit.com/user/GermanExpat18 (Account now deleted)
https://www.reddit.com/user/sciencearousal
https://old.reddit.com/user/Agreeable-Plane-5361

Amfani da sunan YouTube na Addu'a:

Sanannin sunayen Twitter da ake kira Prause

Yi amfani da laƙabi da aka yi amfani da shi akan wasu rukunin yanar gizo:

Misalan Yin amfani da sockpuppets akan Quora, inda Gary Wilson lokaci-lokaci ya amsa tambayoyi game da jarabar batsa. Sockpuppets kawai yayi sharhi a ƙarƙashin amsar Wilson. Quora yana buƙatar membobi suyi amfani da ainihin sunayensu. Mods ban trolls da ke amfani da sunaye na karya (kamar yadda suka yi da sunayen karya na Prause):

Kalmomin suna da kama da yawa a cikin abun ciki da sauti, suna iƙirarin cewa:

Wilson bai taba koyar da ilmin mutum ba, physiology, pathology ko halarci koleji,
Wilson ya saci hotunan mata kuma ya sanya su a shafin batsa,
Wilson yana da rahoton 'yan sanda da aka ba shi,
Wilson shi ne mai warkarwa mai warkarwa,
An cajin Wilson a game da mummunan mace,
An ruwaito Wilson zuwa LAPD, UCLAPD da kuma FBI.

Wadannan maganganun ƙarya sunyi ba tare da wani mai sukar Wilson ba kuma suna cigaba da wannan rana a cikin tweets da sharhi ta hanyar Prause da ta da yawa kayan aiki.

Likley aliases Prause yayi aiki don gyara Wikipedia (yin amfani da suna fiye da ɗaya ƙeta dokokin Wikipedia ne):

Ban iya dangantawa da wasu sunayen laƙabi da dama ba, kamar da yawa a Psychology Today , da kuma wasu wurare.

Sauran - Lokacin bazara, 2014: Gwadawa yana roƙon marasa lafiya da su ba da rahoton likitocin da ke ba da jima'i a cikin kwamitocin jihohi

Yin amfani da shi ba shi da asirin cewa ta tsayayya da ra'ayi na jima'i da jaraba na batsa. A lokacin rani na 2014 Prause sanya bayanin sanarwa a kan shafin yanar gizon SPAN Lab. Kuna iya karantawa kan kanka cewa Kunafi yana ƙarfafa dukan mutane da ake bi da su don jaraba da jima'i don bayar da rahoto ga masu kwantar da hankulan su zuwa kwamiti na jihar (yana dauke da hyperlink)

Wannan ba shi da ƙwarewa, kuma ba shi da ɗabi'a domin DSM da ICD sun ba da damar gano cutar da za a iya mayar da kuɗi . Idan wani ya rasa wannan, Prause ta biyo baya da wannan tweet:

Wata guda daga baya Lurawa ta tunatar da mu duka don bayar da rahoto game da likitancin jima'i. Yana da kyauta kuma mai sauki!

Kalmomin batsa ba su tsaya ga rubuce-rubucen Twitter da aka yi wa sana'a ba. Tana ƙara wa kanta kwarin gwiwa, tana zargin masu ilimin halayyar ɗan adam da yin maganin zamba. Shin wannan ba rashin hankali ba ne ga masanin ilimin halayyar ɗan adam, musamman ganin cewa (1) ana iya yin binciken halayen jima'i na tilastawa ta amfani da ICD-10 na Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya da (2) Sashe na F52.8 na DSM da kanta ya amince da ingancin ganewar sha'awar jima'i fiye da kima a matsayin cuta mai inganci, wadda za a iya biyan kuɗi? A takaice, Kalmomin batsa kuskure ne kuma yana nuna rashin da'a.

Prause ta yi amfani da asusunta na laƙabi RealYBOP don ba da labarai, tana ba da shawarar cewa ya kamata a ba da rahoton mai ilimin jarabar batsa. Muna da Prause tweeting tare da Prause (RealYBOP)

---------

Fall 2014: Rubutun Lafiya da aka kwance ga masu samar da fina-finai game da Gary Wilson da Donald L. Hilton Jr., MD

Masu gabatar da labaru sun tura email zuwa Gary Wilson:

Re: Documentary a kan batsa

Hi **********

Ina buɗe magana da ku, amma zan iya bayyana abubuwa biyu.

Na farko, na yi imani, kuma na buga, wasu mummunar tasirin fina-finan jima'i. Yana da kyau a ce ina ba da gaskiya cewa yana da addicting. Idan yana da amfani a gare ka don samun masanin kimiyya wanda zai iya magana game da amfanoni da matsalolin da za a iya samu tare da fina-finan jima'i, tabbas zan fi dacewa da wannan nauyin.

Abu na biyu, Ba na son in sanya ta cikin hamayya da Gary Wilson, Marnia Robinson, ko Don Hilton. Babu wani daga cikin wadannan mutane masanan kimiyya, kuma duk sun kai hari kan kaina, ba tare da komai ba a gare ni in sanya su a kai tsaye tare da su. Alal misali, sun yi iƙirarin cewa hotunan batsa na asirce ni ne, sun gurbata bayanai na, kuma sun rubuta ni da jami'ar jami'a sau da yawa suna ƙoƙarin ba ni tsoro a gida da aiki. Idan kuna la'akari da waɗannan mutane, zan yi farin ciki don in gana muku da wasu masana kimiyya na ainihi waɗanda suka goyi bayan finafinan jima'i na iya haifar da jaraba. Wadannan mutane, a ganina, za su rushe kashin ganga don fim.

Na fahimci wannan bayanin na iya zama a cikin adawar kai tsaye ga burinka don samun sarauta na kyauta, don haka na fahimta idan ban kasance da amfani ga fim naka ba wannan bayanin ba. Duk da haka, mafi kyawun sa'a tare da aikinku!

Nikky

Nicole Prause, Ph.D.

Masanin kimiyya mai bincike

Jami'ar California, Los Angeles

www.span-lab.com

An sake yin ƙarya. Kamar yadda aka yi bayani a ƙasa, Wilson bai taɓa cewa Prause ta "ɓata bayananta" ko kuma "batsa ne ke ba ta kuɗi." Yayin da Gary Wilson ya rubuta UCLA yana rubuta cin zarafin Prause da cin zarafin yanar gizo ( duba ƙasa ), bai taɓa yin ƙoƙarin tuntuɓar Prause kai tsaye a gida ko a wurin aiki ba. (A zahiri, Prause ne ya fara duk wata hulɗa kai tsaye da Gary Wilson kamar yadda aka rubuta a sashe na farko .) Donald Hilton Jr. MD ya tabbatar da cewa bai taɓa yin ƙoƙarin tuntuɓar Nicole Prause ko UCLA ba, kuma bai faɗi abin da Prause ya yi iƙirari a cikin imel ɗin da ke sama ba.

Muhimmin batu : Akwai dalilin da zai sa a yi imani da cewa wannan ɓata sunan Wilson da wasu a bayan fage hanya ce ta Prause. Duba ƙarin misali da ya shafi mujallar TIME da Gabe Deem a ƙasa . Lura da yadda Prause ke ƙoƙarin sarrafa wanda ake yi wa tambayoyi ta hanyar faɗin cewa ba ta son "a sanya ta a cikin adawa da Gary Wilson ko Don Hilton."

updates:

Sauran - Disamba, 2014: Yi aiki suna amfani da laƙabi don kai farmaki da ɓata sunan abokin aikin UCLA Rory Reid PhD (a fagen dawo da batsa). Lokaci guda, UCLA ya yanke shawarar kada ya sabunta kwangilar Prause.

Wani ɗan bayani game da Rory Reid da tsohon mai bincike na UCLA Nicole Prause yana da amfani a nan. Rory Reid ya kasance masanin ilimin halayyar ɗan adam a Makarantar Magunguna ta David Geffen, UCLA tun kafin ɗan gajeren lokacin da Nicole Prause ta yi a UCLA ya fara a ƙarshen 2012. Yankunan binciken Reid sune yawan jima'i da jarabar caca.

Kamar Prause, Reid sau da yawa yana jayayya game da wanzuwar "jarabar jima'i." Reid ya bayyana a cikin wani labarin da aka buga a 2013 cewa ofishinsa yana kusa da na Prause a UCLA. A cikin 2013 Nicole Prause ta lissafa Rory Reid a matsayin memba na "SPAN Lab" ɗinta da ta daina aiki. Amma a cikin 2014 komai ya canza: ta fara kai hari ga tsohon abokin aikinta Reid.

A ranar 5 ga Disamba, 2014, wani sabon memba na shafin dawo da batsa na YourBrainRebalanced (TellTheTruth) ya wallafa sharhi 4 yana sukar Rory Reid yana kira ga masu karatu da su kai rahoton Reid ga hukumomin California. Hoton hoton sharhin wannan sunan Prause:

Kamar yadda aka rubuta a cikin sassan da ke sama, Yin amfani da al'adu ya yi magana game da YBR ta amfani da sunayensu daban-daban. Bugu da ƙari, Yi amfani da yin amfani da sunan yau da kullum tare da kalmomi masu mahimmanci na 2-4 a matsayin sunayen masu amfani.

A cikin bayanin farko na TellTheTruth ya nuna 2 links. Wata mahada ta je PDF a kan Scribd tare da shaidar da ta dace da goyon bayan TellTheTruth da kuma haɗi zuwa shafin yanar gizo na California.gov.

Karin bayani biyu daga TellTheTruth:

-

Da ke ƙasa akwai ƙananan hotuna na PDF cewa TellTheTruth sanya a kan Scribd:

----

-----

-----

Duk da yake babu wata shakka cewa TellTheTruth shine Mutum (wanda zai sake rubutawa game da Rory Reid?), Tabbatacce cikakke ya zo watanni 20 daga baya lokacin da Prause ya buga daidai wannan abun ciki da ainihin takardun a shafin yanar gizon AmazonAWS ta amfani da sunan kansa. Duk wanda aka rubuta a wannan sashe: Satumba 2016: Yi amfani da hare-hare da libels tsohon abokin aikin UCLA Rory C. Reid PhD. Shekaru 2 da suka gabata "TellTheTruth" sun ba da ainihin takamaiman iƙirarin & takardu a kan shafin dawo da batsa wanda yawancin wasan tsalle-tsalle masu tsalle-tsalle suka yawaita..

Yi kwatanta abin da aka saukar da PDF ɗin ta TellTheTruth zuwa takardun da ake amfani da su a cikin shafin AmazonAWS:

https://web.archive.org/web/20190825022023/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/Reid_FoundryGroup.png
https://web.archive.org/web/20200414144053/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/Reid_PsychToday1.png
https://web.archive.org/web/20200414100431/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/NoLicenseInCalifornia.png
https://web.archive.org/web/20200414133722/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/PsychToday_UCLA.Address.Given_Claims.LCSW.Psychologist.png
https://web.archive.org/web/20200414194604/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/BevHillsClinicalPractice_ClaimsLCSW.png

Ka lura da wannan "2013 copyright State of California" bayanin halin kwaikwayon na yanzu na Prause da kuma labarin TellTheTruth na 2-year-old screenshot.

Maɓallin kewayawa: Bayanin TellTheTruth da PDF daga Disamba, 2014 sun zargi Nicole Prause kamar yadda ake yin cybertalking Rory Reid a daidai lokacin da UCLA ta zaɓi ba ta sabunta kwangilar Prause ba. Daidai ne kawai? Ko kuwa An yi ramuwar gayya ne kan Reid lokacin da UCLA ba ta sabunta kwantiragin ta ba? Ko kuwa ba su sabunta kwantiragin ta ba ne saboda halayyar ta rashin kwarewa?

Duk da yake Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa an tilasta mata barin aikin mafarki a UCLA don neman "bincike mai ban mamaki," ba za a iya musanta wasu hujjoji ba: Yi wasa da tursasawa da ɓata sunan abokin aikin UCLA Rory Reid. UCLA ba ta sabunta kwantiragin ta ba. Rory Reid ya kasance mai bincike a UCLA.

Janairu, 2015: "Halin Farko" wanda aka bayyana a watanni 9 ta hanyar YourBrainRebalanced.com troll an fassara ta karshe

[Don sake dubawa, wani shirin YourBrainRebalanced troll ( TrickyPaladin ) ya buga sharhi 50 ko fiye a ranar da aka buga binciken JAMA fMRI kan masu amfani da batsa (yana tabbatar da cewa kwakwalwar masu amfani da batsa tana nuna canje-canje masu ma'ana waɗanda suka yi daidai da lokaci/shekaru na amfani). Yawancin maganganun TrickyPaladin ko dai kai hari ne ga Wilson ko kuma cikakkun bayanai (yunƙurin) kare binciken EEG na Prause na 2013. Yayin da Tricky ta goge yawancin maganganunta, ta bar wasu suna cewa babi a cikin wani littafi mai zuwa zai yi cikakken bayani game da munanan abubuwan da Wilson ya aikata.]

Littafin da babi yanzu sun iso: “ Sabbin Ra'ayoyi Kan Batsa: Jima'i, Siyasa, da Shari'a. ” Babin da ake magana a kai ("Kimiyya da Siyasar Binciken Batsa ta Jima'i.") Nicole Prause da Timothy Fong ne suka rubuta shi. Ya ƙunshi galibin tattaunawa kan "samfurin" da ya dace don fahimtar amfani da batsa ta tilastawa. Sassa biyu ne kawai aka keɓe ga iƙirarin da Prause ta yi na cin zarafi. Iƙirarin da ya fi ban mamaki shine cewa " mutane sun tsara hanyoyi zuwa adireshin dakin gwaje-gwaje. " A wata ma'anar, Prause tana iƙirarin cewa taswirar Google ta gaya mata lokacin da mutane ke neman adireshin dakin gwaje-gwajenta. Tabbas Prause ba ta ambaci sunan Wilson ko wani a cikin babinta ba.

Mahimmin ma'ana: Sanin cikakkun bayanai game da wani babi da ba a buga shi ba watanni 9 kafin a buga shi yana zargin Masu amfani kamar TrickyPaladin. Kamar yadda cikakkun bayanai masu cikakken bayani game da kare karatun aikin 2013 EEG mara kyau.

Babin kuma ya yi nuni da cewa Prause a matsayin GaryWilson Stalker , GaryWilson IsAFraud da sauran sunayen laƙabi da yawa da ke wallafa kalaman batanci jim kaɗan bayan an buga sukar Wilson . Iƙirarin da ke cikin waɗannan rubuce-rubucen da PDF ɗin iri ɗaya ne da waɗannan biyun da ke cikin babin Prause:

Yi aiki da "An sace hotunan"
"Wasu mutane sun yi ta yi mata i-mel akai-akai bayan da muka nemi tuntuɓar su daina… sakamakon rahoton inan sanda ”

Dukansu ikirarin suna nufin Wilson, kuma duka biyu ƙarya ne.

[Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama, ga gaskiyar bayan kowane da'awar:

1) "An sata hotuna"

An yi amfani da hoto ɗaya, wanda Prause da kanta ta zaɓa, daga (abin da ya bayyana) gidan yanar gizon dakin gwaje-gwaje na UCLA a cikin wani labarin game da wani bincike da UCLA da Nicole Prause suka buga kuma suka tallata . "Shafin batsa" YBOP ne, wani da'awa mara tushe, domin gidan yanar gizo ne na tallafawa dawo da batsa ba tare da abun ciki mai ƙima ba.

2) "Mutane akai-akai email da ni… .yan sanda rahoton yi"

Rahotan 'yan sanda:' Yan sanda ba su tuntubi Wilson ba. Kira ga 'yan sanda na' yan sanda na Los Angeles da 'yan sanda na UCLA ba su bayyana irin wannan rahoto ba a tsarin su.

Imel Imel: Prause ne ya fara duk wata hulɗa da Wilson bayan ya rubuta wani rubutu a shafin yanar gizo na Psychology Today . Imel ɗin da Prause ya yi wa barazana sun ƙunshi barazana da maganganun ƙarya, kuma Prause ne ya ci gaba da cin zarafin Wilson. ( hotunan hotunan mu na imel ɗin gaba ɗaya )

A cikin sura ta Prause kuma ya ce:

"Abin lura babu wadannan hare-haren an wallafa sukar ne daga kowane masanin kimiyya."

Sabanin da'awar da Prause ke da'awa 18 an sake yin nazari game da karatun nata:

Steele et al,, 2013 - takarda 1, takarda 2, takarda 3, takarda 4, takarda 5, takarda 6, takarda 7, takarda 8
Yi amfani da al al,, 2015 - takarda 1, takarda 2, takarda 3, takarda 4, takarda 5, takarda 6, takarda 7, takarda 8, takarda 9
Yi Amfani & Pfaus, 2015 - takarda 1

A cikin sura ta Prause ya yi wannan sanarwa:

"Ba a taɓa dakatar da binciken ba ta waɗannan ƙoƙarin."

Game da binciken Prause a UCLA bai taba tsayawa ba, yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa UCLA ta zaɓi kar ta sabunta kwangilar aikin Prause (duk da cewa ta ci gaba da da'awar a bainar jama'a cewa har yanzu ita mai binciken UCLA ce da ke aiki a makarantar likitanci). Ba a taɓa yin amfani da Prause ba ta UCLA ko wata jami'a tun a ƙarshen 2014 ko farkon 2015.

Sauran - 2015 & 2016: Yi waƙar ƙarya suna zargin masu ba da ilimin jima'i game da maganin sake gyarawa

David Ley da Nicole Prause sun sake haɗuwa. A wannan karon sun zargi masu ilimin jima'i da yin maganin gyara ko maganin juyawa. Ya fara ne da Ley ya buga " Liwadi Ba jaraba bane" wanda ba wai kawai an zarge shi da yin ƙarya ba, har ma an zarge shi da ƙoƙarin karkatar da abokan cinikinsu na luwadi . (Amsa ga koke-koke, daga baya an tilasta wa Ley ya canza rubutun kuma Psychology Today daga baya ya goge tsokaci.)

Yi amfani da tweeted Ley post:

( Sabuntawa : Yanzu haka masana'antar batsa tana biyan David J Ley kuɗi don tallata gidajen yanar gizon su, yayin da yake musanta illolin batsa da ƙarfi. Duba - Ci gaba - Yanzu haka kamfanin Xhamster na masana'antar batsa ya biya David J. Ley diyya don tallata gidajen yanar gizon sa da kuma shawo kan masu amfani da shi cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i tatsuniya ne. )

Prause ita ce ta fara yin tsokaci, tana zargin IITAP da ɓoye masu ilimin gyaran hali, kuma tana da'awar cewa ta aika wa IITAP sunayen waɗanda ake zargi da aika musu da imel. Duk da cewa daga baya an goge maganganun Prause, ta yi tsokaci bayan 'yan makonni tana zargin mai ilimin gyaran hali (ɗan luwaɗi!!) Michael J. Salas da yin maganin gyaran hali kamar haka:

Bayan da ba ta sami amsa ba ga zarge-zargenta marasa tushe, ta yi wa Salas "korar" a matsayin mai ba da shawara kan gyaran hali. Ta ɗauki jimla ba tare da mahallinta ba, tana fatan babu wanda zai ziyarci gidan yanar gizon sa . Duk da haka, a shafin yanar gizon sa, masu karatu sun gano cewa Salas ya ƙware a fannin maganin ga al'ummar 'yan Luwadi/Madigo/Madigo/Madigo. Shi memba ne na " Matsalolin 'Yan Luwadi, Madigo, Madigo Biyu da Matsalolin Madigo a Texas a Ba da Shawara", Salas ya kuma ce:

“Ga kwastomomin da suke luwadi,‘ yan madigo, ko masu jinsi biyu, na samar da LGBT Affirming Therapy. Babu wani abu kamar canza yanayin yanayin jima'i na wani ”

Bai ƙare a nan ba. A ranar 22 ga Nuwamba, 2015, mai rubutun ra'ayin kanka a yanar gizo na Psychology Today, Joe Kort, ya buga " Me yasa ba ni da sauran mai ilimin jima'i da jaraba, " wanda ya haifar da wata matsala a dukkan fannoni. Nicole Prause nan da nan ta yi tsokaci game da musayar imel ɗinta da IITAP (Prause ta kira ƙungiyar CSAT da kuskure, wacce ita ce takardar shaidar IITAP ):

Mun bayar da rahoto kuma sun ƙi yin bincike {https://www.psychologytoday.com/comment/802499#comment-802499}

Ƙaddamar da Nicole prause a kan Nuwamba 23, 2015 - 6:21 pm

A kan mika sunayen wasu sunaye da damuwa, CSAT bai amsa ba. Bayan an shigar da tambayoyin guda uku da sauran masu sana'a suka amsa cewa zargin da aka yi sun yi ƙarya. Ba su samar da wani bincike ba. Domin marubucin nan don yin tambaya ba zai canja kome ba kuma zai sake sanya shi wata manufa ta wannan al'umma. Zan yi watsi da kowa daga yin jituwa da ƙungiyar ba tare da niyyar magance matsalolinta ba.

Ina farin cikin raba imel tare da ku a asirce. Sun kasance abin banƙyama a gare ni a matsayin likitan lasisi.

A gaskiya ma, duk wani bincike ya nuna cewa ikirarinta ƙarya ne gaba ɗaya. Danna hanyar haɗin zuwa sharhin Prause kuma ba ka ga amsa ba. Wannan saboda Joe Kort ta goge duk tsokaci da ke ƙalubalantar Prause , ta bar ƙirƙirarta ba tare da an ƙalubalantar ta ba. Mun sake buga waɗancan tsokaci da aka goge a ƙasa. Sharhi 2 na farko suna da CSAT Michelle Saffier tana neman bayanai game da Prause, kuma Prause tana amsawa:

The 3 Prause "gunaguni" ba komai bane face yin amfani da yanar gizo. Michelle Saffier ba ta sami bayanai ko imel ba daga Prause. Sharhi na gaba da ke kalubalantar Yin amfani an saka shi ba a sani ba:

Kuma, Joe Kort ya goge kalaman da ke kalubalantar Prause, yayin da ya bar ikirarin batanci na Prause ya ci gaba da wanzuwa. Ayyukan Kort sun jawo martanin Twitter , da kuma martanin da bai gamsar ba (daga baya Joe Kort ya goge amsoshin Twitter da ya bayar ga Michelle da sauransu). Share maganganun Joe Kort ya sake jawo wani tsokaci a cikin rubutunsa na yanar gizo (tun lokacin da aka goge su).

Joe Kort ya rufe duk tsokaci kuma ya goge tsokacin da ke sama. Har yanzu ba a ƙalubalanci tsokacin Prause ba. Prause ta ci gaba da iƙirarinta mara goyon baya da kuma ɓatanci game da masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali na CSAT. Misali, a wannan watan Maris, 2016, ta yi tweet tare da ɗan ƙasarta David Ley.

Wani mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali na CSAT yana amfani da "jarabar jima'i" a matsayin hujja don maganin ramawa. # IITAP daina tallafawa yanzu.

Yana da, tabbas, gaba ɗaya ba gaskiya bane.

Yi amfani da Ley suna zuwa twitter zuwa masu kwantar da hankali ta hanyar yanar gizo & masu tayar da hankali da IITAP (yawancin masu warkarwa waɗanda suka yi niyya bisa kuskure sun kasance gayan luwaɗi!). Fewan misalai:

------

Ba shi da dangantaka da IITAP:

------

Jima'i ji abubuwa… ..

------

Mataki na asali ba tare da IITAP ba:

------

An sake share tweets na 3 na gaba ta hanyar amfani. A zahiri, gungura dukkan shafin twitter kuma baza ku sami CSAT ba mai suna azaman mai kwantar da hankali.

-

-

---

David Ley ya ci gaba da ɓata sunan CSAT na (2019)

Yi amfani da Ley da kuma nuna su a matsayin marasa lafiya cyberstalkers.

Afrilu, 2019 - Yin wasa da wanda aka azabtar, yayin bayar da shaidar sifili don da'awar cewa akwai “masu warkarwa kai tsaye suna tallafawa mutanen da ke aika mata barazanar barazanar”.

--------

Ƙarin ƙirƙiro-ƙirƙiro daga Nikky. Imel ɗin IITAP ya mayar da martani ne ga Prause yana zargin CSAT na 'yan luwaɗi da laifin maganin ramawa (kuma duba - Wasu - Janairu, 2019: Prause ya zargi mai ilimin IITAP na 'yan luwaɗi da yin maganin ramawa. )

-------

Sauran - Maris, 2015 (mai gudana): Yin wasa da ppan tsana (wanda ya haɗa da “PornHelps“) Ku bi Gabe Deem (ya ƙunshi abubuwa da yawa na ɓatanci ta hanyar Prause da kuma mai suna @ BrainOnP0rn)

Gabe Deem ya warke daga mummunan ED da batsa ya haifar ta hanyar daina amfani da batsa ta intanet. Yanzu yana gudanar da Reboot Nation kuma lokaci-lokaci yana bayyana a talabijin da rediyo don tattauna abubuwan da ya fuskanta da sauran maza game da matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa. A watan Maris na 2015, Gabe ya buga cikakken sharhi kan takardar Nicole Prause da Jim Pfaus, " Kallon Ƙarfafawar Jima'i da ke da alaƙa da Babban Amsawar Jima'i, Ba Rashin Lafiyar Erectile ba." Duk abin da ke cikin shafin Gabe daidai ne, an rubuta shi, kuma ba za a iya musantawa ba. Sukar Gabe ta yi daidai da Wasika zuwa ga Editan mujallar inda jaridar ta bayyana, ta Richard A. Isenberg MD , kodayake ta ba da ƙarin bayani game da bambance-bambancen da ke bayyana a cikin takardar Prause da maganganun da ba a goyan baya ba.

An yi dogon muhawara lokacin da mai amfani da "FapSlap" ya buga takardar Prause & Pfaus akan reddit/nofap. Mai kare haƙƙin masu laifi "FapSlap" (wanda ya bayyana a matsayin mai bincike) daga ƙarshe ya yi iƙirarin tuntuɓar Nicole Prause yana neman harsasai don kare takardar Prause. Ga sharhin FapSlap wanda ke tabbatar da ba kawai musayar imel ɗinsa da Prause ba, har ma da martanin da zai mayar wa masu sukarta nan gaba:

Gaskiya ba ruwanka ko ka yarda da ni ko a'a. Za ka iya aika mata da imel da kanka. http://i.imgur.com/3xjtBph.png

Tabbas tabbas zaku iya cewa 'karya ne karya.' Amma yarda da ni ba haka bane. Saboda girmamawa ban sanya tattaunawar ba. Za ku sami hujja nan ba da daɗewa ba don mujallar, ku amince da ni 🙂 Kuma zan yi matuƙar farin ciki da ganin 'jakar ku a cikin ganga' an watsar da taga.

FapSlap ya kasance mai gaskiya, kamar yadda "ainihin" Nicole Prause ta yi tsokaci ba da daɗewa ba tare da sunan mai amfani " DataScienceLA " (lura da ikirarinta, a cikin rubutu mai kauri):

A gaskiya, kawai ya rubuta ni kuma yana daidai. Mun tattara cikakken IIEF a cikin binciken da yawa wanda ba mu ƙaddamar da bayanan ba. Wasu lokuta muna zaɓa kada, wani lokaci masu yin nazari suna gaya mana mu cire su saboda basu dace ba.

Muna wallafa wasikar goge a cikin mujallar don nuna duk ƙididdiga zama daidai. Dukkanan nazarin sun kasance daidai. Tsarin ya tsaya.

Ba zan mayar da martani ga duk wani rubutu da zai biyo baya ba. Na yi rubutu a nan ne kawai saboda tausayi, domin kuna yi wa wannan talaka ƙarya. Jira har sai wasiƙar ta bayyana a watan Afrilu kuma za ta kawar da duk tatsuniyoyin da RebootNation ke yaɗawa ga talakawan da suke amfani da su don ba da kuɗin tafiye-tafiyensu na magana da kuɗaɗen shiga da kuma taken "mai ba da shawara" na ƙarya.

Amsar da aka yi alkawari ba ta magance kowace damuwa ta Isenberg ba (kamar yadda Deem ya nuna daga baya) kuma kawai ta ƙara sabbin da'awar da ba a goyan baya ba da kuma maganganun ƙarya. Prause ya kuma faɗi ƙarya cewa Gabe (RebootNation) yana ƙarya kuma yana samun kuɗi daga RebootNation da kuɗin magana. Duk da cewa babu ɗaya daga cikin wannan gaskiya ne, waɗannan da'awar daidai ba da daɗewa ba za su sake bayyana ta hanyar "PornHelps" da sunayen masu amfani da r/pornfree puppet da yawa.

A ranar 31 ga Maris, 2016, an buga labarin murfin TIME wanda ya ƙunshi Gabe, da sauran mazan da suka warke daga matsalolin jima'i da batsa ya haifar. A ranar 1 ga Afrilu, rubutun da ke tafe daga TruthWithOut ya bayyana a reddit/pornfree: Gabe Deem ta yarda cewa ta ci riba daga NoFAP Reboot Nation. Rubutun farko, sunan mai amfani na "TruthWithOut", da wasu daga cikin sharhinta, an goge su daga baya (kodayake yawancin sharhinta sun kasance). Rubutun asali, wanda ke ikirarin TIME ta "fitar" da mummunan Deem:

Mai kula da reddit/pornfree "Iguanaforhire" ya gane cewa ɗan tsana mai saƙa ya taɓa buga irin wannan labarin ƙarya a baya:

Ba haka bane. Mutum ya ƙirƙiri sabon asusu don kawai ya dame mu. Kuma.

Za ku iya karanta sauran maganganun TruthWithOut kuma ku ga irin waɗannan maganganun ƙarya da aka maimaita akai-akai: 1) Gabe yana ƙarya game da komai, 2) bai taɓa samun ED ba, 3) yana samun kuɗi daga duka RebootNation da kuɗin magana, kuma, 4) ba shi da aikin yi. Duk ba gaskiya ba ne. Misali ɗaya :

Kuma ina jiran wannan shaidar Gabe. KOWANE ƙananan shaidu cewa ba ƙarya kuke yi ba. Babu wanda ya ga wani abu yana tabbatar da kowane ɓangare na labarinku. Ba yarinyar da kake tsammani ba, babu likita, babu kowa. Kuna iya samar dashi cikin sauƙin, amma baku samu ba.

Kuna iya tafiyar da tafiye-tafiye da kuɗi daga mutane da kuke motsawa cikin tsoro tare da abubuwan da kuka yi.

Gaskiyar magana? Labarin Mujallar TIME ya faɗi ba daidai ba cewa Gabe Deem ya sami kuɗi ta hanyar kuɗin magana. Duk da cewa wannan ba gaskiya ba ne (kuma daga baya TIME ta gyara shi a bainar jama'a ), TruthWithOut ya yi amfani da wannan kuskuren aikin jarida don kai hari, yana da'awar jerin ƙarya. Bayan 'yan kwanaki Deem ya wallafa gyaran daga sigar mujallar TIME . ( TIME ta amince da cewa ta yi kuskure wajen faɗin cewa Deem yana samun kuɗi daga ayyukansa da suka shafi RebootNation.) Ƙarshen labarin. Duk da haka, wasu 'yan wasan Prause sun buga irin wannan zarge-zargen (cewa "Deem ya yi ƙarya game da komai ") akan Reddit/pornfree da sauran wurare. Misalai kaɗan:

A cikin wannan sharhin, Prause (kamar yadda yake da matukar damuwa game da Gabe Deem yana wargaza Prause & Pfaus, 2015 cikakken sharhinsa: Babu wani abu da ya ƙara a cikin Nazarin Ban mamaki: Matasan Matasa 'ED Hagu Unexplained - ta Gabe Deem:

Muna da wani ɗan tsana mai suna Prause sock puppet (AskingForProof) wanda ke rubuta wannan :

Wani Fushin sockpuppet tare da kalmomin da aka saba da su na 3, suna tsokanar Gabe Deem akan reddit / mara kyau) - tare da ainihin irin abubuwan da Gabe yayi na lalata batsa ta ED. An fara farawa tare da wannan sakon, kuma kusan kusan maganganun 20 suna biye da shi:

Abin da ke faruwa shi ne, Gabe bai samu kuɗi daga dandalin tattaunawa na dawo da batsa ba kuma bai taɓa karɓar kuɗi don yin magana ba. Kalmomin da Aka Yi Amfani da Su/TruthWithOut kawai ku ci gaba da yin ihu:

--------

--------

Karin bayani:

--------

Karin ragings:

--------

Karin bayani:

---------

Ƙarin bayani ta Fassara sockpuppet:

-----------

Ganin ganin hoton?

------------

Kuma tana ci gaba da tafiya:

----------

Kara…. kuma mafi:

-----------

Haka ne, akwai ƙarin:

Kuma akwai wasu karin tsokaci da dama, amma kuna samun hoton yadda wannan mutumin yake ma'anar son zuciya da kuma ramawa. Wannan ba a ware shi ba, kamar yadda zaku iya gani a wannan sashe kawai, da kuma wannan shafi daban tare da ɗaruruwan tsokaci da tweets na Prause game da Wilson . Akwai ƙarin misalai da yawa, gami da Prause ta amfani da sunayen masu amfani na bogi guda 4 don saka sama da sau 100 a cikin dare ɗaya a dandalin dawo da batsa na YourBrainRebalanced (kusan dukkan tsokacin suna kai hari ga Wilson da Deem - kuma kusan duk an goge su daga baya)

Kawai don nishaɗi, duk da haka wani zaren r/pornfree wanda wani ɗan tsana mai suna Prause ya fara: DontDoDallas - (Deem yana zaune a Dallas):

Da yake magana game da ƙarya, labarin Newsweek da ke sama bai taɓa ambaton Gary Wilson ko YBOP ba.

Kamar yadda aka bayyana daga baya , shaidu sun nuna cewa Prause ya raba asusun twitter na @pornhelps tare da wasu kuma ya ƙirƙiri sunan mai amfani na PornHelps Disqus .(@pornhelps daga baya sun goge asusun twitter ɗinsu lokacin da aka cire su a matsayin Prause). A ƙasa akwai sharhin PornHelps Disqus da aka buga a daidai lokacin da ake magana game da ƙaryar batsa "Gabe Deem ya yarda yana cin riba":

Duba kowa! Yana da Gabe Deem ya sake sake sake yin maganganu na nuna wariyar launin fata da kuma tallata nasa matsayin da aka ɗaukaka! Kuna iya tuna shi daga Dalilin dalili inda aka yanka shi don sanya wannan saƙon anti-kimiyya tare da haɗin yanar gizo. Ba shi da digiri na kwaleji, ba aiki, kuma ana biyan shi (duba Time labarin) don yin magana game da matsalolinsa da ya yi ikirarin (ba tare da shaidar likitoci ba) sun kasance "saboda" batsa.

Na san na sani, zaku sake yin dogon jerin hanyoyin haɗin yanar gizo da fatan ba wanda zai bi su kuma ya san gaskiyar, amma wannan shine. Kuma ban kara shiga ba. Da fatan jama'a sun kafa lokutan baya da kayi wannan zasu sake samun sakonnin ku Gabe Deem.

PornHelps ta yi nuni ga labarin TIME , tana yin iƙirarin ƙarya kamar yadda ake yi wa 'yan tsana na Reddit. Wannan ba abu ne mai sauƙi ba. A ƙasa za ku ga cewa Prause a matsayin Prause (watau, ta amfani da sunanta) ta kira 'yar jaridar TIME Luscombe da wanda ya kafa NoFap.com Alexander Rhodes 'maƙaryata' da 'masu ƙarya'.

--------

SABUNTARWA: Ta amfani da asusunta na @BrainOnPorn , Prause ta ci gaba da ɓata wa Gabe suna da kuma cin zarafinta (ko da yake Gabe ta toshe ta). Misalai kaɗan:

Kamar yadda aka ambata da yawa, saboda matsalolin jima'i da ke haifar da batsa sune babbar barazanar masana'antar batsa, RealYBOP (wanda aka kirkira Afrilu, 2019) yana cike da damuwa game da batsa na batsa mai lalacewa. A cikin wannan tweet RealYBOP ya nuna cewa Gabe ya yi fata da Alex Rhodes suna kwance game da PIED (kuma suna yin hakan ne don riba):

RealYBOP da'awar ba gaskiya ba ne kuma abin ƙyama ne.

--------

Satumba 30, 2019 tweet game da Alex Rhodes. A cikin shi RealYBOP yaudarar karya cewa NoFap yayi ƙoƙari ya rufe ainihin ilimin kimiyya, amma sun ɓace (yana danganta da shawarar WIPO a cikin yarda da RealYBOP)

A cikin wannan sakon, RealYBOP ya ce Gabe Deem "Yayi ƙoƙari don a cire shafin yanar gizonmu bc ba zai iya amsa kimiyya ba":

RealYBOP ya ci gaba, yana ɓata sunan Deem, kuma yana nuna cewa ya yi ƙoƙari ya rufe masana kimiyya (yana danganta da shawarar WIPO).

RealYBOP ta yi ƙarya cewa Deem yana da hannu a cikin wata ƙara. Wannan ɓata suna ne kawai.

--------

Kashegari, RealYBOP ta tarar da Gabe (wanda ta hana):

Lura - Gabe ba koci ba ne kuma bai taɓa horar da kowa ba. An yi watsi da ikirarin RealYBOP game da nazarin batsa da matsalolin jima'i a nan: Sashen Rashin Lafiyar Jima'i da Sauran Matsalolin Jima'i

Haka kuma, da da'awar cewa Gabe yana da hannu a cikin shari'ar Burgess - ba shari'a ba ce.

---------

Troarin tarkacewa ta asusun da aka katange na asusun RealYBOP

--------

RealYBOP da abokin wasansa NerdyKinkyCommie , troll Gabe Deem (lura cewa Gabe ya toshe duka biyun, amma hakan bai hana masu satar bayanai ta yanar gizo ba):

Na farko, hanyoyin haɗin da aka buga ta trolls Nerdy da James F. sune RealYBOP / Prause suka basu.

Na biyu, an yi wa hoton Nerdy a shafin Twitter sau da dama ta hanyar Prause & RealYBOP. Ba ta da wani abin yi a zaren, amma ba shi da mahimmanci, domin RealYBOP/Prause sun damu da MDPI (kamfanin iyaye na mujallar Behavioral Sciences). Kimiyyar Halayya ta buga Shin Batsa ta Intanet Tana Haifar da Matsalolin Jima'i? Bita tare da Rahotannin Asibiti ( Park et al., 2016). Nerdy tana ƙarya game da ƙimar MDPI. Ga misalan Prause (a matsayin Sciencearousal) da ke saka kuskuren bayanin kula da ke sama ta hanyar Norwegian Register , wanda ba da gangan ya rage ƙimar MDPI daga "1" na yau da kullun zuwa "0". An daɗe ana warware ƙimar da aka rage a shafin MDPI Wikipedia . Prause ta san cewa ƙimar sifili kuskuren bayanin kula ne, duk da haka ita da RealYBOP sun yi tweet cewa an rage darajar MDPI kuma MDPI mujallar cin zarafi ce (dukansu ƙarya ne kuma duka suna cikin gyara na Sciencearousal/Prause Wikipedia).

Na uku, bidiyon 5 na shekara ba shi da alaƙa da China, ko sansanonin boot na jaraba ta intanet. Labarin batsa ne.

-----------

Troarin Tashoshin Gabe (wanda RealYBOP ya toshe):

Nope menene?

RealYBOP yana cinikin Gabe Deem, sake:

Gaskiya: Gabe yayi daidai don zane. Sauran maganganun 2 sune maganganun ja. Koyaya, maganganun RealYBOP basu da mahimmanci. Madadin haka, wannan ikirarin asusun na twitter yana wakiltar masana 20, amma duk da haka ya toshe asusunsa, tare da sakonnin tweets na bogi. Abin kunya. Yadda hankali ya lalace.

--------

A cikin tweet mai banƙyama, RealYBOP ya kira Gabe Deem wani farin supremacist (RealYBOP a kai a kai yana ɓata suna cin zarafin mutane da ƙungiyoyi waɗanda suka ce amfani da batsa na iya haifar da matsala).

Don haka son tweet na wani wanda ba ku sani ba ya sa ku zama mai tsattsauran ra'ayi? Duk wannan yana nuna RealYBOP azaman mai amfani da yanar gizo.

-----------

RealYBOP ta sake jefa Gabe Deem sake: Tana karya game da binciken da take kaiwa shi da kansa.

Gaskiya: Wannan jerin ya ƙunshi bincike 44 da suka haɗa amfani da batsa/jarabar batsa ga matsalolin jima'i da kuma ƙarancin sha'awa ga abubuwan da ke motsa sha'awa . Nazarin farko guda 7 da ke cikin jerin sun nuna dalili , yayin da mahalarta suka kawar da amfani da batsa kuma suka warkar da matsalolin jima'i na yau da kullun. Nazarin dalili guda ɗaya da mutum zai iya yi akan ED da batsa ke haifarwa shine kawar da amfani da batsa.

RE: Tattaunawar TEDx ta Cameron Staley. Ya kasance ɗalibi na farko a Prause lokacin da ya tattara bayanai don Steele et al. 2013. Kadan daga cikin ƙaryar da ya yi a cikin jawabinsa na TEDx inda bai ambaci wani bincike da zai goyi bayan farfagandarsa ba :

Staley ya ce “mai bashi shawara shahararren mai binciken ne game da jima'i!” Me? Ba wanda ya taɓa jin labarin Sallar a baya Steele et al. an buga shi a watan Yuli na 2013 (Prause) ba da labarin binciken).
Staley ya ta'allaka ne game da ainihin sakamakon Steele et al, 2013. Ya ce "abubuwan kwakwalwar ba su yi kama da kwakwalwar masu maye ba" - amma bai taba fada mana yadda kwakwalwar su ta bambanta da masu jaraba ba (saboda ba su yi ba). Takaddun takarda na 8 wanda aka sake dubawa bai yarda da Staley ba, kuma ya nuna cewa batutuwan kwakwalwar sun yi kama da mai shan tabar wiwi. Binciken da aka yi wa matasa Steele et al., 2013 (mafi girman ma'anar sake aiki tare da karancin sha'awar jima'i da abokin tarayya). Lura: Steele et al., BABU ƙungiyar kulawa!
Staley ta shiga cikin binciken Grubbs “tsinkayar batsa mai tsinkaye”, ya fadi cewa Grubbs ya kimanta imani da jaraba.
Staley ta ce matsalolin batsa ba su haifar da annoba: aƙidarmu imaninmu cewa kallon batsa matsala ce, matsala ce.
Ya ce batsa ba zai iya haifar da PIED ba, kodayake 7 takaddun takaddun takardu sun ba da rahoton lokuta na maza da ke murmurewa ta hanyar dakatar da batsa. Kuma ƙarin karatu na 30 sun danganta batsa da matsalolin jima'i / ƙananan tashin hankali - gami da nasa - Steele et al., 2013 (mafi girma sake kunnawa mai dangantaka da karancin sha'awar yin jima'i da abokin tarayya).
Ya ce batsa ba matsala ce ta dangantaka ba, duk da haka Nazarin 75 sun danganta amfani da batsa don mafi yawan jima'i da gamsuwa ta dangantaka.

A taƙaice dai, a cewar Staley - yi imani da cewa amfani da batsa yana da kyau kuma za ku yi kyau ta amfani da batsa. Farfagandar da ba ta da tallafi wadda ɗaruruwan bincike suka ƙaryata.

---------

Kodayake RealYBOP ta toshe Gabe Deem amma har yanzu ta kange shi:

Abin ƙyama yadda aka ba wa “Masanin Ilimin halin ɗan adam” damar faɗi cewa wani saurayi ya yi ɓarna a kafa (RealYBOP maƙaryaci ne - Gabe ba ya samun kuɗi daga wannan).

-----------

A ranar 30 ga Janairu, 2020 – Gabe Deem ya wallafa wannan sakon Twitter tare da ɗan taƙaitaccen bayani daga likitan fitsari Tarek Pacha na gabatar da batsa ED a taron American Urologialc Association, daga 6-10 ga Mayu, 2016 ( Kashi na 1, Kashi na 2, Kashi na 3 , Kashi na 4 )

Nakan farka kowace safiya suna mamakin wannan, ba a magana game da ƙari.

A nan muna da likitan fitsari, Dr. Tarek Pacha, wanda ke gabatarwa a Ƙungiyar Kula da Cututtukan Uro ta Amurka kan karuwar matsalar lalata da batsa ke haifarwa a cikin samari, in ba haka ba maza masu lafiya. pic.twitter.com/lk9ymqoFgj

— Gabe Deem (@gabedeem) Janairu 30, 2020

Bayan @gabedeem ya wallafa a shafin Twitter game da gabatarwar Dr. Tarek Pacha a PIED, RealYBOP twitter (wanda ake tunanin Prause ne ke gudanarwa) ya bata wa Dr. Pacha suna ta hanyar faɗin ƙarya cewa shi BA likitan fitsari ba ne kuma yana samun riba ta hanyar ba da shawarar maza su daina batsa. Gaskiya:

Tarek Pacha ne kwamitin bokan urologist, tare da lambobin yabo da yawa da kuma littafi. RealYBOP / Prause yayi ƙarya.
Pacha ya sami abinci ne kawai kyauta da kuma masauki daga kamfanonin kwararru a cikin adadin nesa da matsakaita ga likitoci. Ari ga ma'anar, kamfanonin likitanci sun fi son Pacha ya daina gaya wa mutane cewa don cimma lafiyar jima'i duk abin da za su yi shi ne barin batsa. Ba za a iya sayar da duk wani kayan aikin likita ba ta wannan hanyar!

RealYBOP yana farawa ta hanyar aikawa da tsofaffi masu cin mutunci guda 4:

A zahiri, ana biyan Prause ne don tallata kayan wasan jima'i kai tsaye da kuma " Zuzzurfan Tunani Mai Kyau ," wanda FBI ke bincike a kai . (duba Bloomberg.com fallasa ,) A taƙaice, an ɗauki Prause aiki don ƙarfafa sha'awar kasuwanci na wannan kamfanin da aka lalata sosai kuma mai cike da ce-ce -ku-ce . Don nazarinta na Orgasmic Meditation , an yi zargin cewa Prause ta sami masu yin batsa a matsayin waɗanda aka yi wa tambayoyi ta hanyar wata ƙungiyar masu sha'awar masana'antar batsa, Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana . Yi la'akari da abin dariya na RealYBOP/Prause yana zargin wasu da abin da ita kanta ke yi.

A nan RealYBOP ta yi wa shafin Twitter na Gabe Deem zagon kasa , duk da cewa RealYBOP ta toshe Gabe daga amsawa:

Na gaba, RealYBOP ta yi ta zarge-zargen da nake yi, inda na fallasa ta a matsayin karya game da Dr. Tarek Pacha . RealYBOP ta toshe ni kafin ta fara aiki. Sai na toshe RealYBOP don hana ta yi min barazana, domin ba zan iya amsawa ba (yayin da Prause ke zarginmu da bin diddigin mutane , tana yawan zarge-zargen asusunmu).

Babu RealYBOP, “sukar” ku bata suna ne, kamar yadda kuka yi karyar cewa Tarek Pacha ba likitan urologist bane. Hakanan kuna ƙarya da'awar rikice-rikice na sha'awa lokacin da babu: babu kamfanin samar da magani da yake siyan abincin Pacha don ƙarfafa shi ya gaya wa samari su kawar da batsa don warkar da ED ɗin su

--------

Fabrairu, 2020 – Duk da cewa Gabe Deem ta toshe RealYBOP, tana zagin Gabe kuma tana ɓata masa suna . RealYBOP kuma tana ƙarya game da yanayin bincike na yanzu.

Ƙaryace-ƙaryace masu banƙyama daga RealYBOP. Akwai wani abu ga masana'antar batsa, ko RealYBOP? Gaskiya: Wannan jerin ya ƙunshi sama da bincike 35 da ke haɗa amfani da batsa/jarabar batsa ga matsalolin jima'i da ƙarancin sha'awa ga abubuwan da ke motsa sha'awa . Nazarin farko guda 7 a cikin jerin sun nuna dalili , yayin da mahalarta suka kawar da amfani da batsa kuma suka warkar da matsalolin jima'i na yau da kullun. Baya ga nazarin, wannan shafin ya ƙunshi labarai da bidiyo daga ƙwararru sama da 140 (farfesoshin urology, likitocin urology, likitocin tabin hankali, masana ilimin halayyar ɗan adam, masana jima'i, MDs) waɗanda suka yarda kuma sun yi nasarar magance ED da batsa ya haifar da asarar sha'awar jima'i da batsa ya haifar.

------------

RealYBOP, da kawarta na SexualSocialist, suna bin Gabe Deem (RealYBOP suna lura da dukkan asusunmu na twitter):

Duk RealYBOP da masu son yin jima'i suna kwance… kamar yadda sukeyi koyaushe.

--------

RealYBOP ya banzatar da Gabe Deem, yayin da yake kwance game da abin da ya wallafa da kuma karya game da abin da binciken FMRI ya ruwaito, kuma masu binciken sun kammala:

Binciken: Bambancin girman abu mai launin toka a cikin sarrafa motsin rai da cututtukan jaraba ( Draps et al. , 2020) Abin da Gabe ya wallafa a shafinsa na Twitter - cikakken ƙarshen binciken:

A lokaci guda, ƙwararren masanin jima'i da jaraba, Farfesa Toates ya fallasa RealYBOP, Prause, da Ley a matsayin maƙaryata (Ley ya toshe Toates bayan gaskiyar - shi ya sa tweet ɗin Ley bai bayyana ba).

Ta yi matukar fushi da Gabe har ta fara amfani da asusunta na "ainihin" don sake buga ƙaryar asusunta na (@BrainOnPorn). Yawanci tana son ɓoyewa a bayan halinta na RealYBOP na karya.

------------

Cyberstalking Gabe Deem da kwance. A post game da samari dawo dasu safiya itace da kuma maras wata-wata tsayar gani kawar da batsa amfani. Sukar RealYBOP ba ta da alaƙa da abin da Gabe ya ce.

---------

Gabe Deem, mai fafutukar kare haƙƙin ɗan adam ta yanar gizo, kuma, tana da ra'ayin rashin hankali. Ta kuma raina MD a cikin bidiyon ( zaren Twitter na Gabe, wanda ya goyi bayan ikirarinsa gaba ɗaya ).

RealYBOP ba ta taɓa ɗaukar wannan abu ba. A nan, tana da'awar rashin sani cewa dopamine ba shi da alaƙa da sha'awar jima'i ko jaraba. Ta daɗe tana tura sha'awarta mara kimiyya don fallasa ta da Ley a matsayin masu jin kunya game da ilimin halittar kwakwalwa: Gyara Rashin Fahimta Game da Ilimin Jiki da Halayen Jima'i Masu Matsala (2017) na Don Hilton, MD.

--------

A cikin mafi munin ƙazantar tweet duk da haka, RealYBOP tana ba da shawarar cewa mutane da yawa sun kashe kansu saboda taron Gabe. A wata karyar kuma, RealYBOP da karyar cewa Gabe koci ne. Bai taɓa cajin kobo ɗaya don shawara ba - ya ba da awanni masu yawa ga mabukata. Akasin karyar Prause, samari da yawa sun ce Gabe ya ceci rayuwarsu.

--------

Cyarin cyberstalking. RealYBOP da'awar cewa yin amfani da batsa don dawo da batsa hudum yana cutar da samari.

-------

RealYBOP ta ci gaba da bincikenta da kuma karya.

Ka lura da yadda RealYBOP ke zargi, amma har yanzu ba ta ba da misalai (misali “rashin daidaituwa ta maganganun magani").

---------

Gabe ta soki ra'ayin Kelsy Burke da nuna son kai, haƙiƙa bugawa, wanda aka karanta kamar tana yin hira da wutar NoFap. A zahiri, babu ɗayan batutuwan Burke da ya fito daga Nofap. Wannan shine yadda ake haifar da farfaganda.

Gabes zaren:

Wani labari kwanan nan a cikin @Slate :

1) tattaunawa da kungiyoyin coci sannan kuma ya ci tura a NoFap ba tare da ambaton sun nuna cewa ba na duniya bane kuma ba maganin tashin hankali ba (ko batsa). Me yasa?

2) ya yi iƙirarin "Yawancin masana kimiyya na yau da kullun ba sa kwatanta shi da jarabar ƙwayoyi da barasa." Ƙarya. https://t.co/0tHz6DSFcu

— Gabe Deem (@gabedeem) 20 ga Mayu, 2020

---------

Ley ya wulakanta takarda da baya so, RealYBOP ya shiga ciki, yana nufin Gabe Deem tare da ƙaryar ta:

---------

16 ga Yuni, 2020 : Biyu cike da labaran karya daga mai amfani da yanar gizo RealYBOP. Labarun guda biyu sun ƙunshi hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na gabatarwa da dama a taron NCOSE (Alex Rhodes, Gary Wilson, Gabe Deem, Gail Dines). Babu wanda aka biya kuɗin gabatarwarsu, kuma waɗannan mutane 4 ba sa karɓar kuɗi daga ƙungiyoyin addini (3 daga cikin 4 ba sa yarda da Allah).

--------

Barka da zuwa na ji haushi da na kama ta da ƙarya.

Duba wannan don yin sharhi kan @BrainOnPorn - Sharhi kan da'awar da ke tattare da "Martani ga Jima'i da Tasirin Yanayi mara kyau akan Sha'awar Jima'i a cikin Maza Masu Jima'i da ke Yin Jima'i da Maza" (2020).

Ƙari na wannan

-------

Cyberstalking. Takarda ba ta faɗi abin da take iƙirarin ba

--------

Laifin komai sai batsa:

Tallafawa Gabe:

Porn / jima'i buri? Wannan shafin ya lissafa 55 neuroscience-based karatu (MRI, fMRI, EEG, neuropsychological, hormonal). Duk amma ɗayan suna ba da goyan baya ga ƙirar jaraba kamar yadda binciken su ya zama madubi binciken binciken jijiyoyin da aka ruwaito a cikin karatun jarabawar abu.
Gaskiyar masana kan ra'ayi akan batsa / jima'i? Wannan jerin ya ƙunshi 32 kwanan nan tushen nazarin wallafe-wallafe da sharhi by wasu daga cikin manyan masana kimiyya a duniya. Duk suna goyon bayan tsarin ƙari.
Alamun jaraba da kuma cigaba zuwa mafi matsanancin abu? Aikin nazarin 60 yana binciken rahotanni daidai da cigaba da yin amfani da batsa (haƙuri), al'ada zuwa batsa, har ma da kawar da bayyanar cututtuka (duk alamu da alamomin da ke hade da jaraba). Pagearin shafi tare da Nazarin 14 sunyi rahoton alamun karbowa a cikin masu amfani da batsa.
Matsalar jima'i da jima'i? Jerin wannan ya ƙunshi nazarin nazarin 40 da ke haɗa jita-jita ta batsa / jaraba na batsa ga matsalolin jima'i da ƙananan ƙananan hawaye zuwa jima'i na jima'i.. The Binciken na farko na 7 a jerin sun nuna lalacewa, yayin da mahalarta suka kawar da yin amfani da batsa da kuma warkar da dysfunctions na yau da kullum.
Abubuwan kyama a kan dangantaka? Fiye da nazarin 80 ya danganta amfani da batsa don ƙarancin jima'i da dangantaka gamsuwa. Kamar yadda muka sani dukan nazarin da ya shafi maza sun bayar da rahoton karin amfani da batsa da aka danganta talauci jima'i ko dangantaka gamsuwa.

----------

Cyberstalker:

-------------

SABUNTARWA – KAWAI SHAWARWARIN CIBERSTALKING-DEMATION ICEBERG. ƘARIN SASHE DA YA SHAFI GABE:

Sauran - Satumba, Oktoba 2015: Nicole Prause's Asusun Twitter na asali (@NikolePrause) har abada dakatar da tashin hankali

An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause - @NicolePrause - har abada jim kaɗan bayan ta karya dokokin Twitter ta hanyar (sau biyu) wallafa bayanan sirri na ɗaya daga cikin marubutan wannan takarda "Jinkircin Jijiyoyin Batsa na Intanet: Bita da Sabuntawa" (2015) . Jaridar ta yi suka ga nazarin EEG guda biyu na Prause kan masu amfani da batsa: Sharhi 1 , Sharhi 2.

Nan da nan bayan an dakatar da asusun Twitter na Prause, wannan rubutun batanci ya bayyana a reddit/pornfree, yana ɓata sunan Gary Wilson, Gabe Deem, marubucin wannan takarda da ke sama (Todd Love), da sauransu. Sabbin sunayen masu amfani guda uku da aka ƙirƙira sun yi tsokaci mafi yawa ( PDF na sunayen laƙabi na Nicole Prause da ta saba wa & ɓata suna ):

Ma'aikatan Reddit/Pornfree sun fahimci troll (Jima'i yana da yawa akan reddit/pornfree da reddit/nofap):

An goge sunayen masu amfani guda biyu daga baya, amma EvidenceForYou ya kasance. Sharhi da dama ba su nuna shakka cewa Nicole Prause ce ba - musamman ta hanyar faɗin cewa lauyoyi suna da hannu a yanzu, ko kuma cewa Wilson zai gurfana a gaban kuliya:

Link – Gary Wilson, suna da adireshin IP ɗinka da duk bayanan da aka samu daga sammaci. Ba ma bin waɗannan sabbin ƙaryar ba, kawai za mu dakatar da wanda ka riga ka faɗa. Ku shirya ku sake shigar da ƙarar fatara.

Link - Idan ba za su iya yaƙi da kimiyya ba, sai su yi yaƙi da mutumin. Sun gaza, don haka suna yaɗa jita-jita na ƙarya waɗanda a halin yanzu ake shari'a a kansu. Wannan ya tabbatar da hakan.

Link - Misali, wajen yin bitar wani sharhi (wanda ba ya wanzuwa), suna da'awar cewa masanin kimiyya ba ya aiki: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/our-response-rory-reids-critique-nicole-prause-study Wannan, af, sabuntawa ne na baya-bayan nan (ganin waɗannan rubuce-rubucen kuma kuna tsoratar da Gary? Latti, mun riga mun aika mata da hotunan allo.) an shayar da shi daga "korar da aka yi a baya".

Mako ɗaya ko biyu bayan haka (15 ga Oktoba, 2015) Gary Wilson ya sami wasiƙar 'dakatar da dainawa' daga lauya mai wakiltar Nicole Prause. Ya bayyana cewa Gary Wilson ya yi kalamai huɗu na ƙarya da na ɓatarwa game da Prause. Tabbas, duk huɗu ba gaskiya ba ne (kamar Wilson yana cewa "Prause ya fito a fina-finan batsa"... abin da ba za a iya yarda da shi ba!). Wilson ya amsa da wasiƙar da ke nuna cewa duk ƙarya ne, kuma ya nemi shaidar waɗannan da'awar ( wanda aka sake bugawa daga baya a wannan shafin ). Babu wani martani da lauya ko Prause suka bayar. Duk da haka wani misali na ci gaba da cin zarafin Prause yayin da yake taka rawar wanda aka azabtar a lokaci guda.

Sauran - Nuwamba, 2015: John Adler, shafukan yanar gizo na MD game da tsokanar Nicole Prause & David Ley

John Adler, MD , wanda shine Babban Editan Cureus , ya rubuta wani rubutu a shafin yanar gizo game da cin zarafin da ya yi a hannun Nicole Prause da David Ley da abokansa: Fascism na Hankali . A cikin rubutun, Adler ya bayyana halayen da muka yi tsammani daga Prause & Ley:

Mutane biyu, waɗanda ƙwarewarsu ta mamaye labarin da ba daidai ba [Prause da Ley], sun kai hari ga labarin saboda kuskuren siyasa, da kuma a taƙaice, mutuncin aikin jarida na Cureus saboda rashin wannan kuskuren a lokacin aikin bita na kafin bugawa.

Nan da nan na gayyaci masu sukar su rubuta rikodin ta hanyar sharhinmu da ladabi, amma a cikin jerin sakonnin sirri na sirri (kuma dole ne asiri), masu sukar sun ƙi, suna dagewa kan ci gaba da ba da sani. A cikin kwanakin da suka gabata, sun tattara adadin mutanen da suke da alaka da irin wannan ra'ayi wanda suka jaddada cewa labarin da ake tambaya ya kasance babban mummunar kimiyyar kimiyya kuma ya bukaci a sake dawowa ... tsawon lokaci!

... A lokaci guda kuma, na ci karo da wanzuwar wata ƙungiyar masu bincike masu ra'ayi iri ɗaya, ciki har da masu suka biyu, waɗanda babban hanyarsu ita ce yin aiki mai ƙarfi, kamar kura, sau da yawa ta hanyar kafofin sada zumunta, lokacin da wasu batutuwan siyasa na ɓangaren siyasa suka taso, kamar labarin da Cureus ya buga ba tare da sani ba.

Idan na taba ganin azanci na ilimi, wannan shi ne; abin da kawai ya ɓace shi ne mutum mai -an ƙwanƙwasa se.

Af, mun san yana magana ne game da Ley da Prause saboda 1) Ley da Prause sun yi zanga-zangar Twitter a kan Adler kafin sakonsa ya bayyana (muna da tweets na Adler , amma tweets na Prause ba su samuwa saboda an dakatar da asusun @ NicolePrause nata na dindindin saboda rashin da'ar da ta yi). 2) David Ley ya buga duk game da wannan a cikin jerin sexology listserve.

A wani ɓangare na guguwar da Adler ya rubuta game da ita, tsohuwar tauraruwar batsa kuma mai masaukin baki a shirin rediyo na yanzu Melissa Hill, ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter cewa ɗan Dr. Adlers " ya sami nasarar dakatar da asusun PhD na @NicolePrause !":

Abin da ke sama ƙarya ne gaba ɗaya domin an dakatar da asusun Twitter na Prause na dindindin saboda wallafa bayanan sirri na ɗaya daga cikin marubutan wannan takarda "Jinyar Jijiyoyin Batsa ta Intanet: Bita da Sabuntawa" (2015) . Trip Adler ba shi da alaƙa da shi, kamar yadda Prause ta jawo shi da kanta. Ƙarshen abin da ya dace shi ne cewa Prause ta ciyar da Melissa Hill wannan labarin ƙarya. Da alama abokai ne. Prause ta bayyana a shirin rediyo na Melissa Hill sau da yawa, kuma Prause ta sake wallafa hotonta da Hill tare a kan jan kafet na kyaututtukan Bidiyon Adult . Bayan 'yan kwanaki, Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana (ƙungiyar masu fafutukar kare haƙƙin masana'antar batsa) ta ba da taimakon Prause, tana ba da shawarar ta tuntuɓi Diane, Shugabar Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana (FSC).

Tambaya: Me yasa masana'antar batsa ke ba da babban taimako ga Nicole Prause? Duk abin da ya sa, Melissa Hill da FSC suka haɗu don tursasa ɗan Adler (Trip Adler) - duk saboda Prause ta gaya wa Hill da FSC zargin da ta ƙirƙira cewa Trip Adler ya sa aka jefa ta twitter:

Bayan 'yan makonni bayan haka, sabon asusun Twitter na Prause ya yi alƙawarin samun labarin da zai zo nan gaba game da dakatarwar da aka yi mata har abada.

Labarin da aka alkawarta har yanzu bai bayyana ba, kuma Prause bai ba da cikakken bayani (ko gaskiya ba) game da dakatar da Twitter na dindindin. Shekaru uku bayan haka, Prause har yanzu tana zargin ɗanta Adler da rashin dakatar da ita na asusun Twitter na farko:

Prause ba ta taɓa bayar da ko da kwakkwaran shaida ba game da labarinta mai tsawo cewa Shugabar Twitter da kanta ta goge asusunta na farko na twitter. Gaskiyar magana game da dakatarwar da aka yi wa Prause na dindindin tana nan.

updates:

Yuli, 2019: John Adler, MD rantsuwa: Laifin cin amanar Donald Hilton da Nicole R Prause & Liberos LLC.
David J. Ley yanzu masana'antar batsa suna biyan shi don inganta gidajen yanar gizon su, yayin da ya nuna ƙin yarda da illolin batsa. Duba - Mai gudana - David J. Ley yanzu ya cika diyya ta masana'antar batsa ta Xhamster don inganta rukunin yanar gizon ta da kuma shawo kan masu amfani da ita cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i tatsuniyoyi ne

Sauran - Maris, 2016: Gwada (ƙarya) ya fada TIME Mujallar da Gabe Deem ta yi kama da likita don rubuta rubuce-rubuce game da karatunta (wasika zuwa edita) a cikin mujallar ilimi (kuma an gano wasikar zuwa kwamfutar Gabe).

A ranar 31 ga Maris, 2016, an buga labarin murfin TIME ("Batsa da Barazana ga Ƙwayar cuta"), na Belinda Luscombe, wanda ya ƙunshi Gabe Deem, Nicole Prause da sauransu da yawa. Shekara ɗaya kenan da aka fara shiryawa kuma TIME ta yi bitar marubucin da sauran ma'aikatan TIME (masu duba gaskiya) kan iƙirarin da kowane mutum ya yi hira da shi. A cikin wannan tsari, masu duba gaskiya na TIME sun gabatar wa Gabe Deem tambayoyi na ƙarshe don ya tabbatar ko ya musanta.

Wata hujja da za a tabbatar ko a musanta ita ce zargin da Nicole Prause ta gabatar. Prause ya shaida wa TIME cewa Gabe Deem ya yi kwaikwayon likitan likita don ya rubuta wasiƙar zuwa ga editan wata mujallar ilimi (wanda aka bayyana a sama) yana sukar wata takarda da mujallar ta buga ta Prause & Pfaus. Ga hotunan imel ɗin TIME zuwa Gabe. Sun haɗa da gabatarwar imel da zargin daga Prause, amma a bar wasu tambayoyi marasa alaƙa:

Gabatarwa ga imel:

Ƙarshen tambayoyi da dama a cikin email:

---

Richard A. Isenberg, likita kuma marubucin takardu da yawa na ilimi, ƙwararre a fannin Uro-Gynecology, shine wanda ya rubuta sukar (Wasika zuwa ga editan) , wanda aka buga a cikin " Maganin Jima'i Buɗewa ," mujallar da ta buga takardar Nicole Prause da Jim Pfaus, " Kallon Ƙarfafawar Jima'i da ke da alaƙa da Babban Amsawar Jima'i, Ba Rashin Lafiyar Ƙanƙancewa ba. " Tunda Gabe shi ma ya rubuta suka game da wannan takarda , Prause ya bayyana yana zargin Gabe da rubuta sukar Isenberg! Abin mamaki kuma, Prause ya yi iƙirarin cewa UCLA ta gano sukar Isenberg zuwa kwamfutar Gabe Deem. Tabbas, babu wata shaida da aka bayar don tallafawa ɗayan waɗannan maganganun marasa imani.

Yaya yiwuwar UCLA za ta yi kutse a kwamfutocin maza da ke murmurewa daga ED da batsa ya jawo? Abin da ya sa ikirarin Prause game da UCLA ba shi da tabbas shi ne cewa an buga Wasikar Isenberg ga Edita watanni 6 bayan UCLA ba ta sabunta kwangilar aikin Prause ba - duk da haka ta yi iƙirarin cewa UCLA tana yin leƙen asiri ta yanar gizo a madadinta! Duk wannan yana nuna yadda Prause ta yarda ta yi. Kuma ba kamar yawancin halayenta marasa kyau ba, wannan yunƙurin ɓata suna an rubuta shi ta wani ɓangare na uku ( ma'aikatan mujallar TIME ).

Sauran - Yuni, 2016: Yin wasa tare da yar tsana ta PornHelps suna da'awar girmamawa masana ilimin lissafi mambobi ne na "kungiyoyin anti-batsa" kuma "ilimin kimiyyarsu bai da kyau"

Nicole Prause, wacce ta kammala karatun digiri a Kinsey, a cikin wani rubutu da ta yi a shafinta na Twitter game da wannan binciken da aka wallafa don yin sharhi (tun lokacin da aka buga a cikin Neuropsychopharmacology ), ta yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa masu bincikenta guda 9 (ciki har da manyan masu bincike a fannin ilimin halayyar jaraba) membobin “ƙungiyoyin hana batsa ne,” kuma sabon bincikensu “mummunan kimiyya ne.” Tweet ɗin Prause (wanda aka nuna a nan) ya bayyana a shafi ɗaya da binciken ( Shin batsa zai iya zama jaraba? Nazarin fMRI na maza da ke neman magani don amfani da batsa masu matsala) , amma daga baya an goge shi.

Kamar yadda aka saba, ikirarinta ba su da tushe. Na farko, wani kyakkyawan bincike ne, wanda yanzu aka buga shi a hukumance duk da irin juriyar da ba a iya fahimta ba. Na biyu, marubutan sun sami lambar yabo ta farko don wannan binciken a taron Ƙungiyar Magungunan Jima'i ta Turai a 2016. Na uku, marubutan ba su da alaƙa da "ƙungiyoyin hana batsa" na Prause (waɗanda Prause ba ta taɓa yin suna ba).

Misali, babban marubucin shine Dr. Mateusz Gola , wanda ke ziyara a UC San Diego, kuma yana da littattafai 71 da sunansa. Wani marubucin kuma shine Marc Potenza MD, PhD, na Jami'ar Yale , wanda mutane da yawa ke ɗaukarsa a matsayin ɗaya daga cikin manyan masu binciken jaraba a duniya (wanda ya fita daga gasar Prause). Binciken PubMed ya dawo da sama da bincike 460 da Dr. Potenza ya yi.

Kamar yadda Matuesz Gola yake ya bayyana wa "PornHelps" a cikin sashin maganganun, BioRxiv (inda aka yi amfani da Furori) ya wanzu don takardun da aka buga, da kuma ayyukan da za a ba da amsa daga masu bincike don inganta takardu. Ya kamata a lura cewa maganganun “pornhelps” da kuma rubutun Prause sun bayyana a lokaci guda. Shin wadannan pornhelps sun yi magana kamar sauti na masana'antu shill ko mai bincike:

-------

------

------

A bayyane yake cewa Prause a matsayinta na kanta, da kuma a matsayinta na mai lalata batsa, tana cikin damuwa da duk wani bincike na jijiyoyi da ke ba da tallafin kimiyya ga tsarin jarabar batsa ( duk suna yi ). Amma akwai ƙarin bayani game da wannan labarin. Matuesz Gola ta kuma buga wani sharhi na hukuma game da Prause et al., 2015 , wanda ya bayyana cewa binciken Prause ya yi daidai da samfuran jaraba guda biyu da aka kafa ( takardu 8 da aka yi wa bita da takwarorinsu sun yarda da Gola ) - wanda ya saɓa wa iƙirarin Prause (cewa ta musanta (ko, kamar yadda take son faɗa a bainar jama'a, "ta ƙaryata") samfurin jarabar tare da takardarta guda ɗaya).

Marc Potenza ita ce ta haɗu da marubucin binciken Jami'ar Cambridge na 2014 wanda ya yi nazari kan binciken EEG na Prause na 2013 da ba shi da kyau. A cikin hirarraki, Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa bincikenta bai yi daidai da tsarin jaraba ba . A cikin binciken fMRI na Cambridge, Potenza da wasu masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi 10 sun bayyana dalilin da ya sa Prause ta yi kuskure . Wataƙila harin da ta kai wa binciken Gola & Potenza an yi ƙoƙarin mayar da martani ne saboda jajircewarta wajen nuna kurakuran da ke cikin sakamakon bincikenta.

Sabuntawa - Prause ta tabbatar da abin da muka riga muka sani - cewa ita mai lalata batsa ce. @pornhelps daga baya ya ce "Ina da shekaru 15 ina karatu a matsayin masanin kimiyyar kwakwalwa":

Prause, wacce ta kammala karatun digiri a Kinsey, ta kira kanta masanin kimiyyar jijiyoyi, kuma da alama ta fara jami'a kimanin shekaru 15 kafin wannan sakon. Karin bayani akan @pornhelps a nan . ( Sabuntawa - @pornhelps daga baya ya goge asusun twitter da gidan yanar gizon sa lokacin da ya bayyana ga wasu cewa Prause sau da yawa yana tweeting da wannan asusun, yana yin sharhi a matsayin batsa helps, kuma yana taimakawa da gidan yanar gizon)

Sauran - Yuli, 2016: Prause & David Ley sun kai hari ga wanda ya kafa NoFap Alexander Rhodes.

Cikin takaici da aka buga labarin Alexander Rhodes a jaridar NY Times, Ley da Prause sun kai hari kan Rhodes a shafin Twitter.

Yaya ɗabi'ar masana halayyar ɗan adam take ga masu ilimin halayyar ɗan adam su kai hari ga mutanen da ke ƙoƙarin cire batsa daga rayuwarsu su murmure? Ley yana da tarihin kai hari ga Rhodes da NoFap , da kuma cin zarafin samari da ke ƙoƙarin daina batsa . Prause, ƙwararren masanin ilimin halayyar ɗan adam, ya sake wallafa a shafinsa na Twitter, yana yin ba'a ga bayyanar Rhodes:

Rhodes ya sake amsawa, kuma ya yi zargin cewa ya zargi Alexander game da cin zarafin jima'i da aka yi wa mata:

Abinda kawai ake kira kimiyya da Prause ta dogara da shi shine takardar da ta yi suka akai-akai (ba na gaske ba ne), wanda bai sami abin da ta yi iƙirari ba.

Prause ba ta ambaci sunan Wilson ba, don haka tana iya zama ba ta da hannu a shari'a. Duk da'awar ƙarya ce domin Wilson ta kasance 1) 'yan sanda ba su taɓa tuntuɓar ta ba, 2) ba ta taɓa yi wa dakin gwaje-gwajen ta barazana ba, 3) ba ta ƙarƙashin wani "umarnin rashin tuntuɓar juna" sai dai barazanar da Prause kanta ta yi bayan Prause ta yi masa cin zarafi . Wannan tweet ɗin ya sake zargin Prause a matsayin mutumin da ke da alhakin maganganun batanci da aka bayyana a sashe na farko. Prause ya ƙare komai kamar yadda ta saba yi: yana ambaton babu wata shaida da kuma aika wa Rhodes " Na aiko muku da takardu. Kada ku sake tuntuɓe ni. "

Wannan shine MO na Nicole Prause: Fara kai hari na kanka, bi shi da ƙarya, sannan ka kawo ƙarshensa ta hanyar yin kamar wanda aka zalunta ne. Af, Prause bai aika irin wannan takardu ba. Wani ƙarya kuma. Wasu suna kallon guguwar Twitter, wanda ya haifar da wani labarin da ya yi cikakken bayani , da ƙarin saƙonnin Twitter na Prause suna kai hari ga wani mutum (a ƙasa). A halin yanzu, yi la'akari da gaskiyar cewa keta ƙa'idodin APA (Ƙungiyar Masana Ilimin Halayyar Dan Adam ta Amurka) ne ga masana ilimin halayyar ɗan adam su kai hari ga waɗanda ke ƙoƙarin murmurewa.

Ba Yuli 2016 ba ne karo na farko da Prause ta ɓata wa Alex Rhodes suna da kuma cin zarafinsa. A ranar 30 ga Mayu, 2016, Prause ta yi ta zargin wani asusun quora da ba a san shi ba da sunan Alexander Rhodes, don haka tana riƙe da "alamar kasuwanci". Asusun Quora ba Rhodes ba ne. A nan ta wallafa sharhi guda 3 masu ban mamaki :

Kamar yadda aka yi bayani a nan , daga ƙarshe an haramta wa Prause shiga Quora saboda cin zarafin Gary Wilson.

-----------

A cikin 'yan watanni masu zuwa, Prause yana amfani da kowace dama don raina Alexander, NoFap.com, da maza da ke murmurewa daga jarabar batsa :

----

----

Yi amfani da Ley suna magana akan TIME labarin, don haka Gabe Deem da Alex Rhodes

----

-------

A cikin wannan daga cikin shuɗi na Mayu, 2018 tweet wanda ke kai hari Nofap, Prause ya buga wani yanki na ra'ayi a cikin mujallar "Jima'i" yana ta faɗi cewa labarin "ya nuna ta hanyar kimiyya don lalata mata".

updates:

NoFap wanda ya kirkiro Alexander Rhodes ya gurfanar da Nicole Prause / Liberos
David J Ley yanzu masana'antar batsa suna biyan shi don inganta gidajen yanar gizon su, yayin da ya nuna ƙin yarda da illolin batsa. Duba - Yanzu haka David J. Ley yana biyan diyyar masana'antar batsa Xhamster don inganta rukunin yanar gizon sa kuma ya shawo kan masu amfani cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i sune tatsuniyoyi.)

Sauran - Yuli, 2016: Yi amfani da zargin ƙarya @ PornHelp.org da cin zarafin, da kuma ƙin ƙiyayya

Kwana bayan da aka yi wa Alexander Rhodes/Nicole Prause dustup da ke sama, @PornHelpdotorg ya buga wani rubutu a shafin yanar gizo wanda ke bayanin abubuwan da suka faru: “ Tunani kan wani taron Twitter ,” kuma ya yi tweet ga Rhodes, Prause, da David Ley. Wannan ya haifar da wani tattaunawa ta Twitter, wanda zaku iya karantawa gaba ɗaya a nan (prause ya share duk martanin farko na taPrause sake yin ikirarin takardu:

Kuma, Prause ta sake yin rawar da ta saba yi: Fara da ƙaryar da'awar da ba ta da goyon baya. Lokacin da aka nemi ta goyi bayan da'awar, ba za ta iya ba. A ƙarshe, Prause ta koma ga barazanar doka, maimakon takaddun da aka nema ko misalai (domin ba ta da komai). Kamar koyaushe, ta ƙare da "kar a tuntube ni" - sannan daga baya ta faɗi cewa tana da "umarnin rashin tuntuɓar juna" , duk da cewa babu irin wannan abu.

Sauran - Yuli, 2016: Yin wasa & laƙabi da "PornHelps" sun kai hari ga Alexander Rhodes, suna da'awar ƙarya cewa ya ɓata matsalolin lalata da lalata da lalata jima'i

Shaida ta nuna cewa Prause ta raba asusun twitter na @pornhelps da kuma amfani da sunan mai amfani na PornHelps disqus . Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama, Prause ta buga (sannan ta goge) wani tweet mai ban mamaki game da wannan binciken na Matuesz Gola . PornHelps sun yi tsokaci a lokaci guda a ƙarƙashin binciken Gola ta amfani da kalmomin wani mai bincike. Bugu da ƙari, waɗannan tweets na @pornhelps sun fito ne daga Los Angeles, inda Prause ke zaune. (Sabuntawa - @pornhelps daga baya sun goge asusun twitter da gidan yanar gizon su yayin da ya bayyana cewa Prause sau da yawa yana tweet da wannan asusun)

Za mu fara da wani rubutu da marubucin labarin TIME ya wallafa, " Batsa da Barazana ga Ƙwayar cuta ", Belinda Luscombe ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter:

Bayan haka, @pornhelps ya kira Alexander da Belinda maƙaryata. Daga ƙarshe @NicoleRPrause ya shiga cikin lamarin don kiran ɗan jaridar TIME Luscombe maƙaryaci (ƙari a sashe na gaba). Bayanan da ke ƙasa sun ƙunshi tweets da yawa da ba za a iya sakawa a nan ba, amma yawancinsu ana iya samun su a cikin waɗannan tattaunawar: Zaren 1 , Zaren 2 , Zaren 3. A ƙasa akwai samfurin tweets na @pornhelps waɗanda ba su da tabbas da ke ikirarin cewa Alexander ya yi ƙarya game da matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa:

@rawarabayanku @naranku "Jarumi"? Tabbata matsala don inganta harkokin kasuwanci? Ka kasa tabbatar da wani ɓangare na labarinsa
@GoodGuypervert @luscombeland Ƙaruwa yana sa su kudi, a cikin yanayinsa. Wadannan mutane ba su da aikin yi, ba kwaleji ... samu $$$ ko ta yaya
@AlexanderRhodes & @luscombeland suna haifar da tsoro don sayarwa kayayyaki. Abin kyama.
@AnnaraRhodes @ZawankaSuwanka @GawanDaba uh-oh, ya tafi cikakke ad-hominem BC ya kama karya don kashe kuɗi ga matasa.
@AnnaraRhodes @ZawankaSuwanka @GawanDaba to, ina jiran hujjarku cewa duk wani abin da kuke da'awar ya faru a gare ku, mai cin gashin kuɗi.

Alex Rhodes ya koma ga @Pornhelps:

Ya ci gaba, tare da PornHelps yana tambaya game da azzakarin Alex Rhodes kuma yana zargin Alex da yin ƙarya:

Ci gaba:

Alexander ya amsa sau da yawa , amma babu wani bayani. Daga ƙarshe Belinda ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter:

Pornhelps ya amsa, yana ganin ko ƙarya za ta tsaya: " Na ji an yi maka ba'a saboda rahoton ƙarya". Daga ƙarshe asusun Twitter na Prause mai suna "NicoleRPrause" ya yi ihu wajen kiran Luscombe maƙaryaci (a ƙasa). Hmm…ta yaya @NicoleRPrause ya san game da wannan zaren Twitter? Wani ɗan shaida da ke nuna cewa Nicole Prause ta yi kama da @pornhelps.

A cikin wannan shafin Twitter ɗin Pornhelps (wanda shine Prause) ya yi rubutu game da wata hira da David Ley ya yi da Nicole Prause.

A cikin hira na Ley, Prause ya yi ikirarin cewa bayanan da ba a buga ba, ya sabawa duk wani haɗin da ke tsakanin "jita-jitar batsa" da kuma penile injures (Kuyi maimaita cewa ba za ta taba buga bayanan ba). Yana da mahimmanci a san cewa duka Prause da Pornhelps suna ikirarin cewa Alexander ya yi ƙarya game da cutar da penile ta haifar da shi da kuma matsalolin jima'i.

Shin wani abu ne mai ban mamaki cewa kwanaki 3 bayan tweets da yawa na @pornhelps sun kira Alexander maƙaryaci, Ley da Prause sun buga wani rubutu a shafin yanar gizo na Psychology Today wanda aka yi wa jagora kan ɗaya daga cikin ƙorafin Alexander (cewa ya ji rauni azzakarinsa sakamakon yawan yin jima'i)? Abin sha'awa, bayanansu sun nuna cewa kashi ɗaya bisa biyar na waɗanda aka yi wa tambayoyi sun fuskanci irin wannan rauni. Amma kuma, Prause ta ƙi buga bayanan, yayin da take iƙirarin cewa bayananta (ba za a iya fayyace su ba) sun tabbatar da cewa Alexander maƙaryaci ne. A kowane hali, ikirarin shafin yanar gizon Prause bai goyi bayanta ba saboda ba ta tantance "jarabar batsa" ko amfani da batsa na tilas a cikin batutuwa ba (karanta sashin sharhi na rubutun Ley).

Sabuntawa: An shigar da ƙarar cin zarafi ga wanda ya kafa NoFap Alexander Rhodes a kan Nicole Prause / Liberos

**Sauran - Yuli, 2016: Nicole Prause & "PornHelps" suna zargin ƙarya TIME edita Belinda Luscombe na kwance da kuskure**

Luscombe ta kasance tare da Mujallar TIME tun 1995, inda ta zama babban edita a 1999. (Duba shafinta na Wikipedia da shafinta na TIME .) Luscombe ta shafe shekara guda tana binciken matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa a cikin samari, wanda ya haifar da labarin TIME na Maris, 31, 2016 " Batsa da Barazana ga Ƙwayar cuta ." Dukansu Prause da Ley sun kai hari kan labarin TIME , duk da cewa an nuna su a ciki kuma an ambace su (ƙananan kaɗan).

Abin takaici ga jama'a, yawanci Prause da Ley su ne kawai "ƙwararru" da aka nuna a cikin mafi yawan labaran jarabar batsa, yayin da masana kimiyyar jaraba ta gaskiya da aikinsu ba a ma yarda da wanzuwarsu ba. Ba a wannan karon ba. An yi hira da shahararrun masana kimiyyar kwakwalwa guda biyu a duniya, waɗanda suka buga nazarin fMRI akan masu amfani da batsa, don labarin TIME . Haka kuma wani likitan fitsari, da kuma samari da yawa waɗanda suka warke daga matsalar rashin iya jima'i da batsa ta haifar. A taƙaice, an yi bincike sosai kan labarin TIME fiye da kowane labarin kan wannan batu, kuma abubuwan da ke ciki sun nuna gaskiya da kuma halin da kimiyya ke ciki a yanzu. Tun daga lokacin, ƙarin goyon baya ga yiwuwar haɗin gwiwa tsakanin amfani da batsa ta intanet da rashin iya jima'i ya fito a cikin wallafe-wallafen da aka yi nazari a kansu.

Dangane da sakon da Belinda ta wallafa a baya (wanda aka nuna a sama) game da yin aikin labarin na tsawon shekara guda, muna da @pornhelps, suna wallafa wannan a shafin Twitter:

Pornhelps tana da hankali: ta san "gaskiya" tsawon lokacin da Belinda ta yi aiki a kan labarin. Minti goma bayan haka Yi amfani da tweets da ke ikirarin cewa Belinda ta yi mata kuskuren ambato kuma ta "yi ƙarya game da tushenta":

Kamar koyaushe, Yin wasa ba ya ba da misalai kuma babu takardu. Ba tare da yin alama ba, ta yaya Prause ta san game da Belinda ta tweet ko @ pornhelp ta amsa? Wataƙila Yin wasa yana da hankali?

Binciken Gaskiya: Prause da @Pornhelps ne ke ƙarya. Kamar yadda mutane da yawa za su iya tabbatarwa, Luscombe ya tuntuɓi Gary Wilson, Gabe Deem, Alexander Rhodes, Noah Church, David Ley, da sauransu, a cikin shekarar da ta gabata kafin a buga labarin murfin TIME . Bugu da ƙari, Luscombe da wasu masu binciken gaskiya na Mujallar TIME sun tuntuɓi kowane mutum sau da yawa don tabbatar da ikirarin kowane mai hira.

Mun san cewa an tuntuɓi tsoffin ma'aikatan Wilson, haka kuma an tuntuɓi 'yan matan mazan da ke fama da matsalolin jima'i ta hanyar batsa. An kuma nemi waɗanda aka yi wa tambayoyi su musanta ko su tabbatar da ikirarin da aka bai wa TIME ta hannun David Ley da Nicole Prause. An yi wannan a rubuce, sau da yawa sau 2-3 ga kowace da'awa.

Misali, Nicole Prause ta yi wa mujallar TIME ƙarya cewa Gabe Deem ya yi kamar likita ne don rubuta wannan sharhin da aka yi wa takwarorinsa na Prause & Pfaus 2015 (a zahiri likita/mai bincike ne ya rubuta). Abin mamaki ma, Prause ya shaida wa TIME cewa UCLA ta gano sharhin "Richard A. Isenberg MD" (Wasika ga Edita) zuwa kwamfutar saurayin. Wannan yunƙurin ɓata sunan Deem an rubuta shi duka a sama.

A wani yunƙuri na kawo ƙarshen tattaunawar, Belinda ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter kamar haka a ranar 25 ga Yuli:

"PornHelps" ya wallafa wasu amsoshi guda biyu marasa tabbas (Sabuntawa - @pornhelps daga baya ya goge asusun twitter ɗinsa yayin da ya bayyana cewa Prause sau da yawa yana tweeting da wannan asusun ):

Babu wanda ya amsa don ciyar da motar. Examplesarin misalai na asusun twitter na yarda da aka ci gaba da kai hari TIME da Belinda:

-

-

Sabuntawa (Afrilu, 2019): Yi wasa da David Ley kai hari & lalata Luscombe (da Wilson)

A ranar 1 ga Afrilu, 2019, Gary Wilson da Belinda Luscombe sun yi tsokaci a wani dogon zaren twitter da ke tattauna ingancin Binciken Jama'a na Gabaɗaya (wanda ya yi iƙirarin cewa kashi 45% ne kawai na maza, masu shekaru 18-29, suka kalli fim mai ƙimar X a shekarar da ta gabata). Cikin 'yan mintuna kaɗan Prause ta shiga cikin salon kai hari da ɓata sunan Luscombe da Wilson (wanda ya daɗe yana goyon bayan Prause David Ley shi ma ya yi Allah wadai da Wilson). A cikin sakon Twitter na farko daga cikin 8, Prause ta maimaita irin wannan ƙaryar da aka rubuta a wannan shafin. Ta kuma kira Belinda 'yar jarida ta karya , mai yin zamba.

Tunda Prause ya toshe Belinda, Ley ya shiga "fassarar" (amma ya daina kai hare-haren Prause akan Belinda). Belinda ta amsa :

David Ley ya shiga cikin ƙarairayi guda biyu na kansa : Cewa Wilson ma'aikacin TA ne (mataimakin malami) kuma an kore shi daga aiki.

Gaskiya ba ta hana Ley ko Prause ci gaba da bikin ɓata sunansu na Twitter ba , suna kai hari ga Belinda Luscombe da Wilson.

Duk abin da zai faru:

Wilson ba ya sauka daga koleji.
Wilson ba tsoho ba ne a kan bashin ɗalibansa.
Wilson ba TA bane. Ya kasance 'Adjunct Faculty.' (Ta yaya Wilson zai zama TA idan baya halartar SOU a matsayin ɗalibi?)

A ranar 15 ga Disamba, 2019, Pascal Gobry ya buga wani labari mafi cikakken bayani, wanda ya dogara da bincike kan tasirin batsa: Shari'ar da ta danganci kimiyya don kawo ƙarshen annobar batsa . RealYBOP da Nicole Prause sun mayar da martani da sakonnin Twitter guda 90 masu raɗaɗawa waɗanda suka haɗa da hare-haren kai tsaye, tallatawa, zarge-zargen ƙarya - amma babu wani takamaiman bayani game da labarin. Belinda Luscombe na iya dangantawa:

Pascal Gobry ya ce:-Belinda:

Sabuntawa : Yanzu haka masana'antar batsa tana biyan David J Ley kuɗi don tallata gidajen yanar gizon su, yayin da yake musanta illolin batsa da ƙarfi. Duba: Yanzu haka kamfanin Xhamster na masana'antar batsa ya biya David J. Ley diyya don tallata gidajen yanar gizon sa da kuma shawo kan masu amfani da shi cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i tatsuniya ce.

Sauran - Afrilu, 2016: A Nicole Prause sock yar tsana ta shirya Belinda Luscombe Wikpedia shafin

A ranar 31 ga Maris, 2016, jaridar TIME ta buga labarin Belinda Luscombe mai taken " Batsa da Barazana ga Ƙwayar cuta ." Washegari, wani mai amfani da Wikipedia ya bayyana, wanda adireshin IP kawai ya bayyana, kuma ya ƙara waɗannan zuwa shafin Wikipedia na Belinda Luscombe :

Duk da iƙirarin cewa ita “ba marubuciya ba ce a fannin kimiyya,” amma ta ci gaba da ƙoƙarin ɗaukar batutuwan kimiyya. Wannan yakan haifar da ra'ayoyin da ake buƙata daga masanan sannan tilasta su tsabtace mummunan rubutu.

Wani editan Wikipedia ya juya sharhin da ke sama washegari. Ba tare da duba sauran maganganun wannan mai amfani ba, a bayyane yake cewa wataƙila Nicole Prause ce ta yi hakan. Bugu da ƙari, binciken sauran gyare-gyare guda uku na wannan mai amfani da Wikipedia yana share duk shakku cewa wannan aikin Prause ne:

23: 53, 5 Disamba 2016 (Bambanta | tarihi). . (0). . Batsa na batsa (→Yanayin ƙwaƙwalwa)

23: 22, 9 Satumba 2016 (Bambanta | tarihi). . (+ 115). . Halin batsa (Mafi yawan binciken binciken neuro da aka bari a baya ya bar gyare-gyare na baya)

23: 21, 9 Satumba 2016 (Bambanta | tarihi). . (-1,177)‎ . . Halin batsa (Ana kawar da pseudoscience na Gary Wilson)

03: 47, 1 Afrilu 2016 (Bambanta | tarihi). . (+ 206). . Belinda Luscombe (Ba daidai ba a rubuce)

Nikan Nicole Prause ne kawai zai yi gyare-gyare, musamman 3 na ƙarshe:

"Mafi yawan binciken binciken neuro ya bar wasu abubuwan da suka gabata."Wannan yana nufin Yi amfani da al al., 2015, wanda shine binciken da cewa kawai Ku yi fahariya (ba daidai ba) shi ne mafi yawan binciken nazarin ne a kan batutuwa. Babu wanda ya kira ta EEG binciken "mafi yawan binciken" saboda: 1) Yawancin batutuwa na Gidajen Bauta ba sun kasance masu lalata ba; 2) wasu nazarin bincike na biyu sun tantance yawancin batutuwa.
"Ana cire pseudoscience daga Gary Wilson. ” Wanene kuma zai iya (zargin ƙarya) ya zargi Gary Wilson a cikin gyaran Wikipedia? A cikin sashin da ke ƙasa mun bayyana wasu wasan kwaikwayo na sock na Wikipedia waɗanda ke kai hari ga Gary Wilson, gami da tsutsa mai yatsu tare da sunan mai amfani “NotGaryWilson. "
"rashin daidaito a rubuce": Wannan shi ne Kalmomin da ke kisa a cikin rashin takaici a cikin TIME labarin, kamar yadda ta yi watanni bayan haka duka biyu @PornHelps da @NicoleRPrause.

Wannan mummunan hari da aka kai wa tsohon editan TIME Belinda Luscombe saboda yin aikinta da kyau (da kuma ba da ɗan gajeren lokaci ga "madadin gaskiyar" Prause) wani nau'in ɗaukar fansa ne na Prause. ( PDF na sunayen Nicole Prause da ta saba yi wa cin zarafi da ɓata suna ).

Wataƙila laƙabi Prause ya yi aiki don shirya Wikipedia (yin amfani da suna fiye da ɗaya ƙeta dokokin Wikipedia ne):

Sauran - Satumba 2016: Yi amfani da hare-hare da lalata tsohon abokin aikin UCLA Rory C. Reid PhD. Shekaru 2 da suka gabata "TellTheTruth" sun ba da ainihin takamaiman iƙirarin & takardu a kan shafin dawo da batsa wanda Prausean tsana na sock ke amfani da shi.

A ranar 15 ga Satumba, 2016 Nicole Prause ta buga wata sanarwar manema labarai ta bogi a shafin yanar gizo na PROLOG. "Sanarwar manema labarai" ta Prause ta kai hari tare da yin batanci ga mutane da dama, ciki har da Gary Wilson, Donald Hilton MD, sanata Todd Weiler na jihar Utah, da Dr. Todd Love. Wannan shi ne abin da ya rage daga sanarwar manema labarai, yayin da ProLog ta cire abubuwan da ke ciki bayan kwana 2 saboda ya karya manufofinsu. Ba a musanta ba, Prause ta sanya abubuwan da ke cikin sanarwar manema labarai a asusunta na AmazonAWS. Hanyoyin haɗi zuwa takardun da suka shafi Rory Reid da aka ɗora wa shafinta na AmazonAWS (a cikin 2020 Prause ta goge waɗannan hanyoyin haɗin):

https://web.archive.org/web/20190825022023/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/Reid_FoundryGroup.png
https://web.archive.org/web/20200414144053/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/Reid_PsychToday1.png
https://web.archive.org/web/20200414100431/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/NoLicenseInCalifornia.png
https://web.archive.org/web/20200414133722/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/PsychToday_UCLA.Address.Given_Claims.LCSW.Psychologist.png
https://web.archive.org/web/20200414194604/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/BevHillsClinicalPractice_ClaimsLCSW.png

A nan za mu duba sharhinta game da mai bincike na UCLA kuma tsohon abokin aikinta Rory Reid PhD . An ɗauko daga kalaman Prause:

"Masanin ilimin kimiyya" da "LCSW" sune lasisi sunadacciyar lasisi tare da Jihar California da Rory Reid yayi amfani da shi don tallata ayyukansa ga marasa lafiya amma ba su da mallaka. Har ila yau Rory Reid ya bayyana cewa ya halarci makarantar a Jami'ar Harvard kuma yana da "mataimakin furofesa" a UCLA. Reid bai taba samun horo ba a Jami'ar Harvard kuma yana da wani kwamiti, ba mai kulawa ba, a UCLA. An zabi Reid a matsayin ma'aikacin ma'aikacin kamfanin California na ofishin Matsala ta UCLA, don haka ba shi da tabbacin yadda Reid zai iya nazarin fina-finai na jima'i da kuma tuntubi 'yan siyasa game da fina-finan jima'i ba tare da karya yarjejeniyar kwangilarsa ba.

Ƙananan farfadowa kan Rory Reid da tsohon mai bincike na UCLA Nicole Prause yana da amfani a nan. Rory Reid ya kasance mai bincike a fannin nazarin ilmin likita a Dandalin Medicine David Geffen, UCLA tun kafin Nicole Prause ta takaice a UCLA ya fara a 2013. Reid ta bincike wuraren su ne liwadi da kuma caca buri.

Kamar Prause, Reid sau da yawa yana jayayya game da wanzuwar "jarabar jima'i." Reid ya bayyana a cikin wani labarin 2013 cewa ofishinsa yana kusa da na Prause a UCLA. A cikin 2013 Nicole Prause ta lissafa Rory Reid a matsayin memba na "SPAN Lab" ɗinta. Kamar yadda aka faɗa, ba a sabunta kwangilar UCLA ta Prause ba yayin da Reid ya ci gaba da zama mai bincike a UCLA. Duk abin da ya yi don ya ɓata mata rai, Prause yanzu yana kai hari ga tsohuwar abokin aikinta a bainar jama'a da mugunta.

Amma akwai ƙarin bayani game da labarin. Watanni ashirin da suka gabata, a ranar 5 ga Disamba, 2014, an buga wasu tsokaci da dama da ke kwatanta "sanarwar manema labarai" ta Prause (suna roƙon masu karatu su kai rahoton Rory Reid ga hukumomin California) a shafin dawo da batsa na YourBrainRebalanced ta wani sabon memba. Kamar yadda muka gani a sama, Prause ta saba yin tsokaci akan YBR ta amfani da sunayen laƙabi daban-daban. ( PDF na sunayen laƙabi na Nicole Prause da ta saba yi wa cin zarafi & ɓata suna ). Na farko daga cikin waɗannan tsokaci, ta TellTheTruth, ya ƙunshi hanyoyin haɗi guda 2. Hanya ɗaya ta je zuwa PDF akan Scribd tare da shaidar da ake tsammani tana goyon bayan iƙirarin TellTheTruth (Yi amfani da sunayen laƙabi akai-akai tare da kalmomi 2-4 masu manyan haruffa azaman sunayen masu amfani).

Karin bayani biyu ta hanyar TellTheTruth wanda yake madubin "sakin labaran" Nicole Prause (yanzu) an buga shi kusan shekaru 2 daga baya.

-

Bayanin TellTheTruth da PDF daga Disamba, 2014 tare da sakin labaran da aka gabatar ya zargi Nicole Prause kamar yadda ake yin magana da Rory Reid ta hanyar yanar gizo game da lokacin da UCLA ta zaɓi ba ta sabunta kwantiragin ta ba! Daidaitawa?

Muhimmin batu: Takardun da Prause ta sanya a asusun AmazonAWS ɗinta game da Reid iri ɗaya ne da takardun da TellTheTruth ta sanya a kan YourBrainRebalanced shekaru 2 da suka gabata. Lura da "haƙƙin mallaka na 2013 State of California" don hoton Prause na yanzu da hoton TellTheTruth na shekaru 2:

Takardar da aka rubuta a yanzu: https://web.archive.org/web/20200414100431/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/NoLicenseInCalifornia.png (lura da adireshin da ke cikin wannan hoton allo & haƙƙin mallaka na 2013)

Takardar TellTheTruth da ta saka shekaru 2 da suka gabata a dandalin dawo da batsa na YourBrainRebalanced. Ka lura da haƙƙin mallaka na 2013 da kuma yadda TellThe Truth ta manna hoton Reid a cikin PDF ɗinta:

Ga dalilin da ya sa muka san TellTheTruth Nicole Prause ce: Binciken lasisin da ake yi a yanzu yana da sanarwar haƙƙin mallaka na 2016! Prause tana cin zarafi da cin zarafin abokin aikinta na UCLA Rory Reid ta yanar gizo a watan Disamba, 2014 (kimanin lokacin da take barin UCLA), kuma har yanzu tana amfani da hotunan allo iri ɗaya don yin hakan.

Ga wani misali na kwafi takardu da Prause-2016 da TellTheTruth-2014 suka rubuta. Takardar AmazonAWS ta Prause ta yanzu - https://web.archive.org/web/20200414194604/https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/BevHillsClinicalPractice_ClaimsLCSW.png

Abin mamaki, da alama Nicole Prause ta “saci” hoton Rory Reid kuma ta sanya shi a gidan yanar gizo ba tare da izininsa ba. Ya kamata ya shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda? Kuma ga takardar TellTheTruth daga Disamba, 2014. Kuna iya gani daga hatimin URL da taken cewa wannan PDF ne akan SCRIBD:

Takardu iri ɗaya, da'awa iri ɗaya, da kuma jujjuyawar gaskiya ta duka Prause da TellTheTruth. Ga Mahimmin batu: Rory Reid har yanzu mai bincike ne a UCLA yayin da kwangilar Prause a UCLA ba a sabunta ta ba.

Dole ne mutum ya tambayi dalilin da yasa UCLA za ta rabu da wani mai bincike mai tasowa wanda zai iya (1) karyata dukkan fannoni na kimiyya da wani bincike guda ɗaya (a wannan yanayin, fannin binciken jarabar batsa), da kuma (2) shawo kan kafofin watsa labarai cewa ta yi hakan. Abubuwa ba koyaushe suke kamar yadda suke ba.

Satumba, 2016: Yi amfani da libels Gary Wilson da sauransu tare da takardun Amazon AWS (wanda Kalmomin da aka yi amfani da su sau da dama)

Komawa ga sanarwar manema labarai ta bogi da Nicole Prause ta wallafa a shafin yanar gizo na PROLOG a ranar 15 ga Satumba, 2016. "Sanarwar manema labarai" ta Prause ta kuma kai hari da kuma yin batanci ga mutane da dama, ciki har da Gary Wilson, Donald Hilton MD, sanata Todd Weiler na jihar Utah, da Dr. Todd Love. Kuma, wannan shine abin da ya rage na sanarwar manema labarai, yayin da ProLog ya cire abubuwan da ke ciki bayan kwana 2 saboda ya karya manufofinsu. Ba a musanta ba, Prause ta sanya abubuwan da ke cikin sanarwar manema labarai a asusunta na AmazonAWS (Amazon ta ƙi yin sulhu kan takaddamar abun ciki). Tun daga ranar 15 ga Satumba, Prause ta yi ta wallafa sau da yawa game da takardarta a shafinta na Twitter. A nan za mu binciki maganganun Prause game da Gary Wilson.

Prause ya ce: Dole ne Dr. Prause ta shigar da rahoton 'yan sanda ta kuma rufe dakin gwaje-gwajenta na UCLA da kuma ɓoye shi a ƙarƙashin barazana daga wannan mai rubutun ra'ayin kanka a yanar gizo kuma yanzu tana buƙatar kariya ta zahiri a duk tattaunawarta ta jama'a daga gare shi. Tun daga lokacin an gan shi a Los Angeles kusa da gidan masanin kimiyya kuma an sanar da shi game da kula da barazanar LAPD.

An rufe dakin gwaje-gwajenta? Masu gadi dauke da makamai? An ganta kusa da gidanta ? Duk wannan saboda YBOP ta soki bincikenta na EEG na 2013? Duk wadannan ikirarin ba gaskiya ba ne, kuma ikirarin cewa "an ga Wilson kusa da gidan masanin kimiyya" shi ma labari ne kawai. Wilson bai je LA tsawon shekaru ba. Kiran da aka yi wa 'yan sandan Los Angeles da 'yan sandan harabar UCLA ya nuna babu wani rahoton 'yan sanda game da Wilson a cikin kowane tsarin. Wannan shine kawai gaskiyar lamarin a nan.

Prause ya ce: Ya rubuta wa shugaban jami'ar UCLA sau goma sha biyu yana da'awar cewa Prause ta yi ƙaryar bayananta, ta yi ƙaryar takenta, da ƙari, duk waɗanda UCLA ta musanta.

Ƙarya. Wilson ya rubuta (ko ya kwafi) kansila sau 3 a ƙarshen 2013 da farkon 2014 don yin korafi game da cin zarafin da Prause ke yi. Wasikar farko ta sanar da UCLA game da misalai da yawa na cin zarafi, barazanar shari'a marasa amfani da kuma ɓata suna da Prause ke yi wa Wilson da wasu biyu. Wannan wasiƙar ta kuma rubuta barazanar da Prause ke yi wa editocin Psychology Today (waɗanda suka amince suka kuma cire sukar Wilson da suka yi wa wasu masu rubutun ra'ayin yanar gizo guda biyu na Psychology Today (duka ƙwararru)). A cikin sakin layi ɗaya Wilson ya bayyana yadda Prause ya ɓata sakamakon Steele et al ., 2013 ga manema labarai . Takardu takwas da aka yi wa bita a kan takwarorinsu sun goyi bayan ikirarin Wilson: Sukar da Steele et al. , 2013 suka yi wa takwarorinsu bita. Babu inda Wilson ya ce Prause ta "ɓatar da bayananta" ko "ɓatar da takenta." Wilson da UCLA duka suna da haruffan asali. Abubuwan da ke ciki sun tabbatar da cewa Prause tana ɓata sunan Wilson.

Wilson ya aika wa UCLA wasiƙa ta biyu (Disamba 2, 2013) don yin korafi game da sanya takardar da Prause ta yi wa Wilson zagi a gidan yanar gizon dakin gwaje-gwajen SPAN ( kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama ). An ɗauka cewa UCLA tana kula da abubuwan da ke ciki yayin da kowane shafin SPAN Lab ya ƙunshi waɗannan:

Copyright © 2007-2013 SPAN Lab, Dukkan hakkoki na Jami'ar California, Ma'aikatar Lafiya, Los Angeles, CA 90024

Aka sake bugawa a ƙasa sune farkon sakin layi da yawa na wasiƙar Wilson zuwa UCLA Chancellor Block:

Makonni biyu bayan haka an aika wasiƙa zuwa ga Mataimakin Dean Jonathan R. Hiatt don sanar da shi cewa kyautar ta kyauta ta PDF ta kasance. Ba da daɗewa ba bayan haka an cire PDF, kodayake ba a karɓi amsa ta hukuma ba har zuwa Maris, 2014. Mataimakin Dean ya sanar da Wilson cewa gidan yanar gizon SPAN Lab ɗin shafin yanar gizon Prause ne, kuma ba shafin yanar gizon UCLA ba ne gaba ɗaya (!). An sake bugawa a ƙasa wani ɓangare ne na amsawar UCLA ga wasiƙar Gary Wilson:

Don haka Wilson bai " rubuta wa shugaban UCLA sau goma sha biyu ba ." UCLA za ta iya tabbatar da wannan. Dole ne mu sake faɗi cewa Prause ba wai kawai ya kai wa Wilson hari da kansa ba, har ma ya kai wa abokin aikin UCLA Rory Reid PhD hari (duba sashin da ke sama). UCLA ba ta sabunta kwangilar Prause ba.

Prause ta ce: Ya kuma shiga asusunta na sirri na intanet don ya bi ta bayan ya sami umarnin hana tuntuɓarta. Ya sace hotunanta na sirri daga wannan asusun, ya saka su a shafinsa na batsa, sannan ya ƙaura da su don ƙoƙarin guje wa ɗaukar hotunan DMCA har sai da mai ba da sabis ɗinsa ya yi barazanar rufe gidan yanar gizonsa.

Duk ƙarya ne. An yi magana a sama game da iƙirarin "hotunan da aka sace" . Don sake dubawa, Wilson ya rubuta wannan rubutun blog na Psychology Today game da wannan Nicole Prause Psychology Today Interview (wanda ke ɗauke da hoton Prause). Psychology Today ya buƙaci aƙalla hoto ɗaya (duk labaran PT na Wilson sun ƙunshi hotuna da yawa). Tunda wannan rubutun blog ɗin game da hirar Nicole Prause ne da bincikenta, ya ƙunshi hoton Prause. Hoton da ya raka rubutun blog na Wilson's Psychology Today shi ma an yi amfani da shi tare da wannan labarin akan YBOP. Ta zaɓi hoton Prause, kuma ya bayyana a wani shafin da ta yi iƙirarin cewa UCLA ce ke gudanar da shi, tare da wannan sanarwa akan kowane shafi: "Haƙƙin mallaka © 2007-2013 SPAN Lab, An Kiyaye Duk Haƙƙoƙi Jami'ar California, Sashen Ilimin Halayyar Dan Adam, Los Angeles, CA 90024."

Ƙarin Bayani : Prause yanzu tana da'awar a cikin wani PDF na AmazonAWS cewa Wilson ya ƙaura hoton Prause (da labarin da ke da alaƙa) zuwa wasu sabar. Wannan ƙarya ne. Hoton Prause tare da sharhi ɗaya da ya bayyana a shafukan yanar gizo guda biyu daban-daban, PornStudySkeptics da YourBrainOnPorn.com . Waɗannan labaran guda biyu iri ɗaya sun ci gaba da kasancewa a waɗannan gidajen yanar gizo guda biyu tun Yuli, 2013: Labari na 1 , Labari na 2. A cikin PDF Prause ɗinta kuma ta yi iƙirarin cewa ISP na Wilson ya gaya masa cewa "za su rufe gidan yanar gizon sa idan ya yi hakan a karo na huɗu". Wannan bai faru ba.

Prause ta ce: Sunanta ya bayyana sama da sau 1,350 a shafin yanar gizo ɗaya kawai na wani mai rubutun ra'ayin kanka a yanar gizo mai sha'awar rubutu.

Wannan da'awar na iya zama gaskiya. Shafin yanar gizon Prause yana magana ne akan wannan: YourBrainOnPorn.com . Kimanin 700 daga cikin ambato 1,350 suna kan wannan shafin kawai. Me yasa YourBrainOnPorn.com zai ƙunshi ƙarin misalai 650 na "Prause"? YBOP ya ƙunshi shafuka kusan 13,000, kuma wurin share fage ne ga kusan duk abin da ke da alaƙa da amfani da batsa ta Intanet da tasirinsa ga mai amfani. Nicole Prause ta buga bincike da yawa game da amfani da batsa da jima'i, kuma ta hanyar shigarta, ƙwararriyar mai karyata jarabar batsa da matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa.

Binciken Google na " Nicole Prause" + batsa ya dawo da shafuka kusan 13,000. Ta yi ambato a cikin ɗaruruwan labaran jarida game da amfani da batsa da jarabar batsa. Ta buga takardu da dama da suka shafi amfani da batsa. Tana kan talabijin, rediyo, podcasts, da tashoshin YouTube tana da'awar cewa ta karyata jarabar batsa tare da wani bincike guda ɗaya (wanda aka soki sosai ). Don haka sunan Prause babu makawa yana bayyana a wani rukunin yanar gizo da ke aiki a matsayin cibiyar tattara bayanai don bincike da labarai da ke da alaƙa da tasirin batsa ta Intanet.

Ba wai kawai nazarin Prause akan YBOP ba ne, haka nan ma ɗaruruwan wasu nazarin, waɗanda da yawa daga cikinsu suna ambaton Prause a cikin sassan bincikensu. YBOP ta kuma buga dogayen suka kan takardu 8 na Prause. YBOP ta ƙunshi aƙalla suka 18 da aka yi nazari a kansu game da nazarin Prause. YBOP ta ƙunshi aƙalla suka 12 game da aikin Prause. YBOP ta ƙunshi labarai da yawa na jarida waɗanda suka ambato Nicole Prause, kuma YBOP sau da yawa tana mayar da martani ga da'awar Prause a cikin waɗannan labaran. YBOP ta kuma karyata yawancin batutuwan da Prause da ƙawarta David Ley suka gabatar. A ƙarshe, membobin YBOP suna yin tsokaci a nan suna tambaya game da karatun Prause ko da'awarta a cikin kafofin watsa labarai. Duk da haka, YBOP kuma tana sukar wasu bincike masu tambaya kan batsa da batutuwa masu alaƙa. Waɗannan sukar ba na mutum ba ne, amma suna da mahimmanci ( duba sabuntawa ).

Kuna yi wasa da katin misogyny

A cikin 'yan shekarun nan, Dr. Prause ta yi matukar wahala wajen sanya kanta a matsayin "mace da ake azabtar da ita idan ta faɗi gaskiya ga iko." Sau da yawa tana wallafa wannan bayanin da take rabawa a laccocinta na jama'a, tana nuna cewa ana zaluntarta "a matsayinta na mace masanin kimiyya," kuma tana nuna kanta a matsayin mai bin diddigin abubuwan da ke faruwa don tabbatar da rashin lahani na batsa duk da hare-haren nuna wariya. Har ma an san ta da yin amfani da tweet na haɗakar da'awar nuna wariya da iƙirarin cewa (haƙƙin kimiyya, wanda aka yi nazari a kansa) wanda ba ta yarda da shi ba "ƙarya ne." Duk wata shawara cewa Wilson, Deem ko Rhodes suna da sha'awar nuna wariya an ƙirƙira su ne, saboda ƙin amincewarsu ba shi da alaƙa da Dr. Prause a matsayin mutum ko mace, kuma kawai ya shafi maganganunta marasa gaskiya da kuma iƙirarin da ba su da tushe game da bincikenta.

Dangane da Infographic, shaidar da Prause ta bayar game da nuna wariya ita ce cewa Wilson ya taɓa rubuta "Miss Prause" a matsayin martani ga tambayarta game da girman azzakarinsa , kuma ya taɓa rubuta sunanta na farko ba daidai ba a matsayin "nicki." Shi ke nan. Kuskuren rubutu/gyara kai-tsaye suna faruwa a zamanin dijital, musamman lokacin da wani abu ke tambaya game da al'aurarku.

Shafin ya kuma yi iƙirarin cewa Alexander Rhodes mai ra'ayin mazan jiya ne saboda ya kare Wilson daga ikirarin batanci na Prause cewa "An ga Wilson kwanan nan a wajen gidan Prause." Yaushe ne karyata ƙarya ta zama ɓatanci? (Sabuntawa: Wanda ya kafa NoFap Alexander Rhodes ya shigar da ƙarar cin zarafi kan Nicole Prause )

Idan YBOP da gaske yana nuna wariya ga jinsi, me yasa yawancin marubutan muke sukar maza? Wannan shafin ya lissafa nazarin da takardu da YBOP ta yi suka a kansu.

Yawan adadin marubuta da aka jera a kan dukan takardu: 56
- Marubuta marubuta: 42
- Mawallafi mata: 14

Har ila yau, hujjoji na farfaganda.

A ƙarshe, babu wani mai suna a wannan shafin - wanda Prause ya zargi jima'i da misogyny - ya yarda, ko ƙarfafawa, ko dai. Yi magana da su kuma zaku gane cewa akasin haka gaskiya ne. Duk suna tallafawa girmama mata. Maganar su tare da Prause suna tare da dabarunta da kuma da'awar da ba ta tallafi game da bincikenta, ba tare da ita a matsayin mace ko mace mai ilimin kimiyya ba.

Sauran - Yi waƙar ƙarya zargin Donald Hilton Jr., MD

Da yake mun san da'awar Prause cewa Don Hilton, MD, "ya kira ta mai lalata yara," mun tuntuɓi Dr. Hilton. Ga martaninsa:

Game da da'awar Prause, an gabatar da hujjoji a nan. Ban kira ta yarinya mai lalata ba.

Game da 6 ko 7 shekaru da suka wuce na yi magana a garuruwan 3 Idaho a rana ɗaya don wata kungiya mai suna Citizens for Chord. Na yi magana a kan shaidar da ta goyi bayan wani abu mai banƙyama wanda ya shafi matsala masu amfani da batsa, wanda yafi kwayoyin kwayoyin halitta a wancan lokaci. An riga an tabbatar da wannan samfurin ta hanyar bincike na MRI da aikin aiki.

A ƙarshen magana, wata matashiya ta zo ta ce ba ta tsammanin babu wata hujja da ta nuna goyon baya game da maganin ƙwayar cuta. Na koyi daga baya cewa Nicole Prause, wanda ke aiki a Idaho. Daga baya, ta ce ta horar da su a Cibiyar Kinsey, tana nuna cewa ita gwani ce game da jima'i.

Na tambayi mata idan ta goyi bayan bincike da kuma hanyoyin da aka yi wa ma'aikatanta, Alfred Kinsey. Na bayyana mata cewa Kinsey ya hada gwiwa tare da 'yan kwalliya, kuma ya horar da su kuma ya umurce su da lokaci tare da agogon gudu tsawon lokacin da yaran yaran sun zalunce su don isa gabar maras kyau. Na tambaye ta idan ta goyi bayan Kinsey da hanyoyinsa. A wancan lokaci ta zama tawaye.

Iƙirarin da ta yi cewa na ce ita yarinya ce mai gaskiya ba gaskiya ba ce; Ban san ta ba, sunanta, ko wani abu game da ita banda cewa tana sha'awar Kinsey. Abinda nake nufi shi ne cewa mutumin da take ɗauka masaninta ne na ilimin falsafa da sani ya haɗa kai da masu lalata yara. Wannan gaskiyane. An haɗe a haɗe da kwafin Table 34 daga littafin Kinsey game da jima'i na maza da aka buga a 1948 [sake bugawa a ƙasa]. An ƙarami yana ɗan watanni 5, kuma an bayyana shi da ciwon inzali 3. Lura cewa yawancin lokuta suna da lokaci.

Ba zato ba tsammani, Paul Gebhard (mai ba da umarni na littafin jima'i na Kinsey da aka wallafa 'yan shekaru bayan littafin namiji), J.Gordon Muir ya yi hira da shi bayan shekaru. Wannan wani yanki ne daga hirar:

Muir: "To, shin masu lalata da yara yawanci suna yawo da agogon tsayawa?"

Gebhard: "Ah, suna yi idan muka gaya musu muna sha'awar hakan!"

Kinsey, Pomeroy (shugaban farko na AASECT), Gebhard, da sauransu sun yi aiki tare da masu lalata yara 2, Rex King da wani ɗan Nazi mai suna Fritz Ballusek. An gabatar da shari'ar Ballusek sosai, amma ba a kama Sarki ba. Misali na haɗin gwiwar daga wasiƙa a ranar Nuwamba 24, 1944 daga Kinsey zuwa Sarki:

"Na yi farin ciki da duk abin da ka turo, domin an tabbatar min da cewa yawancin kayan ka an adana su ne domin yada su a kimiyance."

Kinsey ta kuma gargaɗi masu lalata da yaransa da su yi taka tsantsan kada a kama su. Don samun takardu, duba Kinsey: Laifuka da Sakamako, wadda marubucinta ya tabbatar min da cewa tana da kaset ɗin hirar wayar salula na asali a cikin tarihinta.

Kodayake ba na kira Nicole Prause wani yaro ba, sai na tambayi ta, kuma na tambayi ta a yanzu, idan ta yi koyi da haɗin Kinsey, masu koyar da shi, da Cibiyar Kinsey tare da 'yan yara. Har yanzu ina jiran amsarta.

A shekarar 2019, wata babbar mujallar nazarin jima'i mai suna Archives of Sexual Behavior ta buga wani labari mai ban mamaki game da cin zarafin jima'i a fannin ilimin jima'i, inda ta bayyana munanan ayyukan Kinsey :

Wasu daga cikin tarihin rayuwar Kinsey sun haɗa da labaran halayen jima'i da ke faruwa tsakanin membobin ƙungiyar binciken (da matansu) kuma sun nuna yadda wasu a wasu lokutan suka ji an tilasta musu shiga irin waɗannan halayen jima'i (Gathorne-Hardy, 1998 ; Jones, 1997 ). Muna jin cewa haɗa rahotannin da ƙungiyar Kinsey ta yi game da amsawar al'aurar jarirai da yara da wani babba ko fiye ya bayar abin takaici ne kuma abin damuwa ne, musamman a lokacinsa da namu. (an ba da muhimmanci)

Domin ƙarin bayani game da ayyukan Kinsey da aka rubuta, duba wannan PDF.

Sharhin YBOP: An sake kama Nicole Prause cikin ƙarya.

Dr. Prause ta damu da Dr. Hilton saboda ya yi ƙoƙarin sukar ikirarin da ta yi game da bincikenta na EEG na 2013 ( Steele et al. , 2013) . An yi ta yaɗawa a kafofin watsa labarai cewa bincikenta ya ba da shaida kan wanzuwar jarabar batsa/jima'i. Ba haka ba ne . Steele et al. 2013 sun ba da goyon baya ga wanzuwar jarabar batsa da kuma amfani da batsa wanda ke rage sha'awar jima'i. Ta yaya? Binciken ya ba da rahoton ƙarin karatun EEG (idan aka kwatanta da hotuna masu tsaka-tsaki) lokacin da aka fallasa mutane ga hotunan batsa na ɗan lokaci. Bincike ya nuna cewa P300 mai girma yana faruwa ne lokacin da masu jaraba suka fallasa alamun (kamar hotuna) da suka shafi jarabar su.

Dangane da nazarin binciken kwakwalwa na Jami'ar Cambridge , wannan binciken EEG ya kuma ba da rahoton ƙarin martani ga batsa wanda ke da alaƙa da ƙarancin sha'awar jima'i tare. A wata hanyar - mutanen da ke da ƙarin kunnawar kwakwalwa ga batsa sun fi son yin lalata da batsa fiye da yin jima'i da mutum na gaske. Abin mamaki, mai magana da yawun binciken Prause ya yi iƙirarin cewa masu amfani da batsa suna da "babban sha'awa," duk da haka sakamakon binciken ya ce akasin haka ne (sha'awar mutane ga jima'i tare ya ragu dangane da amfani da batsa). Takardu takwas da aka yi wa takwarorinsu sun fallasa gaskiya: Sukar da aka yi wa takwarorinsu na Steele et al. , 2013

Muhimmin batu: Mujallar ta ba wa Prause cikakkiyar dama ta amsa sukar Hilton a hukumance. Ta ƙi. Madadin haka, Prause ta kai hari ga Hilton a shafukan sada zumunta kuma ta ɓata masa suna a cikin imel.

Ga wasu misalai na Prause ta wallafa ƙaryarta a shafukan sada zumunta. Prause ta ƙirƙiri wani faifai (tana sanya suna Hilton, Gary Wilson, Marnia Robinson, Nofap, Alexander Rhodes) "tana tabbatar" duk wanda ba ta so "mai son nuna wariya ne," kuma ta ci gaba da aika shi a shafin Twitter akai-akai har zuwa yau (watakila sau 40-50… zuwa yanzu):

----

Ka lura da yadda Prause tayiwa ƙawayenta a AVN (Addinin Bidiyo na Adult, ƙungiyar masu sha'awar batsa) a cikin tweet inda ta yi iƙirarin cewa Dokta Hilton "ta yi kururuwa cewa ta gwada kan yara":

Idan Hilton yayi kururuwa a Prause, me yasa aka nuna hoto & Hilton suna tattaunawar abokantaka bayan jawabin da aka gabatar?

Wani yana kwance.

-------

Yi wasa da David Ley akan Facebook:

----

A cikin 2017, Prause ta wallafa wani rubutu a shafinta na Twitter game da sukar da Dr. Hilton ta yi a shekarar 2013 , yayin da ta yi karyar cewa sharhinta na Lancet ya magance sukar da aka gabatar a cikin takardu 5 da aka yi wa nazari a kansu:

A zahiri, ra'ayin Prause mai kalmomi 240 ya gaza magance takardar Hilton ko ma ambaton takardar Prause ta 2013 ( Steele et al. , 2013 ). A gaskiya ma, sharhin Prause ya kasa magance abubuwan da ke cikin sharhin asali na Marc Potenza: Shin yawan jima'i cuta ce ta jaraba? ( Potenza et al. , 2017) . YBOP ta karyata duk abin da ke cikin ra'ayin Prause a nan gaba ɗaya: Binciken "Bayani ba ya goyon bayan jima'i a matsayin jaraba" ( Previous et al ., 2017).

Dr. Prause har ma ya sake komawa a kan IMDB don kai hari ga Dr. Hilton:

Duk da cewa Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa fim ɗin ya ƙunshi "ƙage-ƙage da ƙarya game da kimiyya", ba za ta iya ambaton ko ɗaya ba. Babu ɗaya. Ba ta taɓa yin hakan ba. Duba duk saƙonnin Twitter na Prause, rubuce-rubucen Quora, sharhin Facebook, ko ma nata biyu. Ba ta taɓa bayar da takamaiman misalai na ƙarya ba. Babu wani ɓangare daga wani bincike. Babu wani ambato daga mai laifin. Manyan dabarun Prause sune ad hominem da sauran ɓata suna.

---------

Prause ta ƙirƙiri sunayen masu amfani sama da 25 don sakawa akan reddit/pornfree da reddit/nofap ( PDF na sunayen laƙabi na Nicole Prause da ta saba wa cin zarafi & ɓata suna ). Ga ɗaya daga cikin safa-safanta da yawa da ke kai hari ga Dr. Hilton:

Kamar koyaushe, Prause ta yi ƙarya a cikin sharhin da ke sama. Mujallar da ake magana a kai ba ta da amfani - kuma ita ce mujallar da ta buga nata nazarin EEG na 2013 - Ilimin Halayyar Dan Adam da Ilimin Halayyar Dan Adam:

Amma Steele et al. , 2013, Prause ta yi kuskuren gano ainihin bincikenta a cikin jaridu - kamar yadda takardu 8 da aka yi wa bita a wannan shafin suka nuna: Sukar da aka yi wa Steele et al. , 2013

Yuni 1, 2019: Ley ya lalata Don Hilton. Ley ya rattaba da wani labari marar amfani da kuma kimiyya mai zurfi ta hanyar Daniel Burgess, mai ƙaunar Prause da Ley:

Burgess ya kuma yi wa Gary Wilson batanci da cin zarafi a shafukan sada zumunta - yana sake maimaita karyar da Prause ya saba yi. An kori Burgess daga rukunin Facebook na " Masu Rarraba Aure da Iyali " saboda bata sunan Wilson a cikin wannan zaren - kuma duba amsoshi 15 da Staci Sprout da Forest Benedict suka bayar ga Burgess. Af, sharhin Burgess kan wasu sassa na littafin Hilton na 2010 ga jama'a abin dariya ne. Misali, Burgess ya kai hari ga Hilton saboda ya ce akwai manyan hanyoyin dopamine guda biyu a cikin kwakwalwa: daya wanda cutar Parkinson ta shafa; ɗayan kuma jaraba ce ke shafarsa. Da yake bayyana jahilcinsa, Burgess ya ce Hilton ya yi kuskure!

------

3 ga Yuni, 2019: Asusun tallata batsa na Prause da kuma asusun Twitter mai aiki sosai, RealYBOP ta haɗu da Ley a wani yunƙuri mai rauni na ɓata wa Hilton suna. RealYBOP ta wallafa hotunan kariyar kwamfuta guda 3 daga martanin 2011 ga wata takarda ta Hilton & Watts a watan Fabrairun 2011: Jarabawar Batsa: Ra'ayin ilimin jijiyoyi.

Bayani akan abin da ke sama:

Na farko, sharhi mai ban tsoro na Rory Reid da Hilton & Watts sun ba da amsa ga Reid suna a wannan shafin.
Abu na biyu, Rory Reid shi ne abokin gida na Nicole Prause (RealYBOP) a LA, kuma ya taka muhimmiyar rawa ta UCLA.
Na uku, Ra'ayi ya juya a kan Rory Reid, daidai game da lokacin UCLA ya zaɓi kada ya sabunta kwangilarta: Sauran - Satumba 2016: Yi amfani da hare-hare da lalata tsohon abokin aikin UCLA Rory C. Reid PhD. Shekaru 2 da suka gabata "TellTheTruth" sun ba da ainihin takamaiman iƙirarin & takardu a kan shafin dawo da batsa wanda yawancin wasan tsalle-tsalle masu tsalle-tsalle suka yawaita.
Na hudu, an yi bayanin cewa Hilton ya yi ikirarin azabar batsa da jima'i tun lokacin da aka tabbatar (da kuma nuna rashin amincewar Reid). Duba Binciken da aka Yi Mahimmanci game da Nazarin.

Nuwamba 14, 2019: A wannan rana, Prause alias @BrainOnPorn tweets game da bayyanar Hilton akan shirin CBS game da batsa:

-------

Nuwamba 19, 2019 : RealYBOP ta raina Don Hilton, MD. (Shi ne wanda ake kira "likitan addini" a sashin CBS game da batsa, amma ya tsaya kan kimiyya kuma bai taɓa sanya addini ya zama wani ɓangare na jawabinsa na jama'a ba. Masu sukarsa ne kawai suke yi.)

Disamba 31, 2019 : Ba tare da wani dalili ba, RealYBOP ta yi kuskuren yin sharhin da Don Hilton ya yi na shekaru 10. Sharhin Hilton & Watts: Jarabawar Batsa: Ra'ayin Ilimin Jijiyoyin Jiki

Disamba 31, 2019: Cyberstalking Gabe Deem (wanda ya toshe RealYBOP) a Sabuwar Shekarar Hauwa'u, RealYBOP tweets cin mutunci da kuma PDF na motsin ɓatancin ta don yin watsi da:

Disamba 31, 2019 : RealYBOP ta yi wa Gary Wilson ihu (duk da cewa na toshe ta kuma ta toshe ni), ta yi rubutu game da Hilton & Watts, 2011 - kuma, kuma ba ta cikin mahallin:

Disamba 31, 2019: A cikin wani abin mamaki da gaske, @BrainOnPorn twitter (wanda a bayyane yake ana sarrafa Prause) ya canza shafinsa na farko don maye gurbin sharhin Rory Reid mara gamsarwa akan Hilton & Watts, 2011 :

Dukkan abubuwan da ke sama suna bijirar da Sallah a matsayin azzalumi mai cin amana / mai fa'ida

---------

updates:

Sauran - Satumba 25, 2016: Yi wa likitan kwantar da hankali Paula Hall

Yi amfani da kira Hall a matsayin "masanin ilimin kimiya" kuma yana ɓatar da ra'ayoyin Hall akan binciken:

Sanannen "masanin kimiyyar lissafi"? Wannan ba ma kalma ce ta gaske ba. Wata guda bayan wallafa wani rubutu a shafin Twitter na Prause, an jera Paula Hall a matsayin marubuciya a wannan binciken kwakwalwa na Jami'ar Cambridge game da masu shan batsa (wanda aka buga a cikin mujallar Human Brain Tapping ): Halayyar jima'i mai tilastawa: Girman gaba da limbic da hulɗa, 2016.

-----------

2020 - Ta amfani da asusunta na RealYBOP na twitter tana kai hare-hare ga wata magana ta mai ba da ilimin jima'i jima'i Paula Hall. Kawai karin yin amfani da yanar gizo.

Ley da RealYBOP sake:

----------

Sauran - Oktoba, 2016: Yin aiki ya yi rantsuwa da ƙarya don ƙoƙarin rufe Alexander Rhodes na NoFap

Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama, Prause tana da tarihin kai hari ga Alexander Rhodes da kansa (koyaushe Prause ce ke fara cin zarafin ta da tweets ɗinta). Misali, (kuma) ga Prause (a kan wani zaren da ta fara ) tana da'awar cewa Alexander Rhodes ya yi ƙarya game da fuskantar matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa:

@AlexanderRhodes da @NoFap sun bi Gary Wilson a shafin Twitter. A ranar 1 ga Oktoba, Wilson ya mayar da martani ga James Guay LMFT (wanda ya yi masa alama da wannan sakon batanci da tayar da hankali ). Da alama James Guay abokin Prause ne. Guay ya sake wallafa takardar karya ta AmazonAWS ta Prause . Wilson da Guay sun yi musayar sakonnin Twitter, inda Wilson ya nemi a ba shi duk wani takardu don tallafawa ikirarin Prause.

@ JamesTherapy Don haka ba ku karanta duk abin da muka rubuta a nan ba: yourbrainonporn.com/ nicole-prauses … Bayar da takardu don da'awar ɓatanci.

James Guay bai bayar da wani takardu ba, amma ya ci gaba da cin zarafin Wilson da wasu sakonnin Twitter da dama. Dole ne a lura cewa Wilson ba ta taɓa yin hulɗa da Prause ko abokanta na Twitter kai tsaye game da zarge-zargen ƙarya da take yi ba. James Guay ne ya yi hulɗa da Wilson kai tsaye a shafin Twitter. Alexander Rhodes ya shiga cikin wallafa wani rubutu mai ban dariya ga Guay game da ikirarin banza na Prause cewa "an ga Wilson a wajen gidan Prause ." Ya ƙunshi hoton wani mutum yana ɓuya a cikin daji:

@ YourBrainOnPorn @ JamesTherapy Ta yaya ka isa wata jiha da sauri don bin diddigi? Kai ma a bayan duk wani abin mamaki na ban dariya?

Muhimmin batu: Wannan sakon Twitter da ke sama bai ƙunshi wannan hoton wani mutum da ke ɓuya a cikin daji ba, wanda aka yi amfani da shi a ƙarƙashin keɓance haƙƙin mallaka na "amfani mai kyau" saboda a bayyane yake cewa manufar hoton ita ce don yin barkwanci/faɗa:

Kamar yadda Alexander Rhodes ya bayyana a cikin sakonnin Twitter da suka biyo baya, Nicole Prause ta yi ikirarin mallakar hoton "mutumin da ke cikin daji" kuma ta shigar da buƙatar cire DMCA ta bogi ta hanyar Twitter. Ta yin hakan, Prause ta yi rantsuwar ƙarya. Rhodes ya wallafa shaidar :

Tweet #1 rubuce-rubuce na karyar Prause:

Dole ne mutum ya kasance tuna cewa yin amfani da shi shi ne maƙarƙashiya na farko, kuma ta da'awar game da Wilson shine ƙetare da damuwa.

Tweet #2 da Alexander ya bayyana cewa kiran fitar da ƙiren ƙarya ba damuwa ba ne:

A ƙarshe Alexander ya yi gunaguni game da bayyana bayanan sirrinsa ga Prause:

Baƙar magana, rantsuwar ƙarya, da cin zarafi - duk an rubuta su. Prause ta amsa da wannan tweet ɗin da kuma "bayanin da ta bayar game da batsa", wanda ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter sau 30 kuma ta wallafa a duk faɗin Quora :

SABUNTARWA – Janairu, 2018: A martanin da ta mayar, Alexander Rhodes ya aika da sanarwar ramawa, yana bayyana wa Twitter Inc. cewa kamar yadda Dr. Nicole Prause ba ita ce mai haƙƙin mallaka ba ko kuma wakiliyar da aka ba ta izini ga mai haƙƙin mallaka, ba ta yi daidai da abin da ta yi ƙarya a cikin sanarwar DMCA da aka aika wa Twitter ba, sanarwar keta haƙƙin mallaka ba ta da tushe. A martanin da ta mayar, Twitter ta ba wa Dr. Prause damar mayar da martani ga sanarwar ramawa ta Rhodes, wanda a ciki ba ta yi ba. Duk da cewa Twitter Inc. ta ce za su dawo da tweet ɗin da aka tace, hoton bai sake bayyana ba har zuwa Janairu 2018, duk da cewa an soke shawarar haƙƙin mallaka. Wannan ya nuna cewa yayin da Alexander Rhodes da NoFap LLC suka yi nasarar bayar da hujja ta shari'a kan takunkumin Prause, har yanzu ta sami nasarar cire hoton da aka sanya a Twitter har abada ta hanyar rantsuwar ƙarya ba tare da wani sakamako na zahiri ba saboda karya doka.

Sabuntawa: An shigar da ƙarar cin zarafi ga wanda ya kafa NoFap Alexander Rhodes a kan Nicole Prause / Liberos.

2015 - 2016: Shafin Quo? Hannun lobbying na masana'antar batsa, da Jagorar Magana Ta Musamman yana ba da Taimakon taimako, ta karɓa kuma nan da nan ta kai hari ga kayan aikin 60 na California (kwaroron roba a batsa).

Shafin California 60 (zaben 2016) ya ba da izinin amfani da kwaroron roba a cikin finafinan batsa. Gidauniyar kula da masu cutar kanjamau (AHF), kungiyar tallata kwayar cutar kanjamau da kuma kungiyar bayar da shawarwari, kuma masu adawa da batsa sun nuna adawa sosai kuma sun isa sosai, Nicole Prause da takwararta David Ley.

A lokacin zaɓen 2016, Prause da Ley sun yi kama da sun damu da kayar da Prop 60, alhali ba su damu da manyan batutuwa kamar kula da lafiya, shige da fice, ko ayyuka ba. Dukansu Prause da Ley sun yi ƙoƙari sosai wajen aika saƙonnin Twitter da sake aika saƙonnin Twitter a kan Prop 60, da kuma goyon bayan Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana , ƙungiyar masu fafutukar kare haƙƙin masana'antar batsa ( tweet1 , tweet2 , tweet3 , tweet4 , tweet5 , tweet6 , tweet7 , tweet8 , tweet9 , tweet10 , tweet11 - LURA: Prause yanzu ta goge duk waɗannan saƙonnin).

A ranar 1 ga Oktoba, 2015 FSC (wacce ta kashe miliyoyin mutane a shari'o'in da ke amfanar masana'antar batsa) sun ba da Tallafi game da abin da ake kira "masu zalunci."

Babban abin da ya fi tayar da hankali a nan shi ne Prause, wacce aka dakatar da asusun Twitter na farko nata har abada saboda cin zarafi da kuma sa ido kan yanar gizo. (Ta hanyar karya dokokinta, Twitter ta ba ta damar ƙirƙirar asusun Twitter na biyu.) Maimakon bayyana gaskiyar lamarin, Prause ta ƙirƙiro wani labari mai tsawo wanda John Adler MD (Stanford) ya sa ta daina amfani da Twitter. Adler ba shi da hannu a korar ta daga Twitter . Ƙarya a kan ƙarya ( takardar shaidar John Adler a cikin ƙarar ɓata suna ta Hilton ).

Prause ya aika da FSC don karɓar “taimako” tare da tursasa mata abubuwa. Prause sannan zai fara tattaunawa tare da wani asusun masana'antar me yasa kwaroron roba a cikin batsa tunani ne mara kyau (matsayin masana'antar batsa):

Yi amfani da haka don taimaka wa FSC (wannan shine farkon dangantaka mai ma'ana?):

Tun daga lokacin, Prause ya taimaka wa FSC a bainar jama'a sau da yawa, gami da misali, tallafawa kamfen ɗin FSC akan Proposition 60 na California mara kyau (kira don kare kwaroron roba a cikin batsa):

-------

Anan ne ta sake dawo da farfagandar FSC. (Kuma, da yawa daga Prause na rashin tsoratarwa na bayanan pro-FSC tuni an share su.):

------

Ba'a ga Gidauniyar Kula da Lafiya ta AIDS , yayin da take goyon bayan wakilan masana'antar batsa:

Wani Ma'anar 60 Tweet:

--------

Duk da haka wani tweet wanda Fuskanci ya inganta matsayin AVN akan Prop 60:

---------

Yi amfani da sake tallata farfagandar XBIZ , kai hari ga Gidauniyar Kula da Lafiya ta AIDS , wacce ke tallafawa kariyar kwaroron roba a cikin batsa (Prop 60): https://twitter.com/AIDSHealthcare

Don tallafawa masana'antar batsa, Prause ta sake yin amfani da farfagandar masu shirya batsa. Prause ta kai hari ga Gidauniyar Kula da Lafiya ta AIDS (wanda ke tallafawa Prop 60):

------

Tagging FSC, retweeting batsa masana'antu farfaganda game da prop 60:

------

Tagging FSC yayin kai hari ga likita na UCLA wanda ya goyi bayan kariyar kwaroron roba ga masu yin batsa (Prop 60):

--------

Karin bayani game da ayyukan da Prause ke yi na goyon bayan FSC a wannan sashe: Nuwamba, 2016: Prause ta nemi mujallar VICE da ta kori ƙwararren mai cutar kansa Keren Landman, MD saboda tallafawa Prop 60 (kwaroron roba a cikin batsa).

Ga abin da ya fi muni: Prause ta gaya wa mujallar VICE cewa ta kori ƙwararre Dr. Landman saboda rubuta wani labarin da ke goyon bayan Prop 60:

Amincewa ya gaya wa duniya yadda ta zabe:

Prause ta shiga cikin zaren da Gary Wilson ya riga ya wallafa a shafinsa na Twitter, tana alfahari da rawar da ta taka wajen kayar da Prop 60 (Prause da sunan da ake zargin RealYBOP sau da yawa suna zagin zaren Twitter na Wilson - duk da cewa Wilson ya toshe asusun biyu):

Don ƙarin takardu, duba: Shin Masana'antar Batsa Ta Shafi Nicole Prause?

2015 & 2016: Yin wasa ya keta ka'idar aikin COPE don tursasa Gary Wilson da ƙungiyar agaji ta Scottish

A ranar 5 ga Agusta, 2016, mujallar ilimi mai suna Behavioral Sciences ta buga wannan takarda: Shin Batsa a Intanet Yana Haifar da Matsalolin Jima'i? Bita tare da Rahotannin Asibiti ( Park et al., 2016 ) . Likitoci bakwai na sojojin ruwan Amurka da Gary Wilson su ne marubutan wannan bita na ilimi na wallafe-wallafen. Ana buƙatar duk marubuta su lissafa alaƙar da ke tsakaninsu. Babban batu na 1: An tsara alaƙar Gary Wilson daidai a matsayin "Gidauniyar Lada" (wata ƙungiyar agaji mai rijista ta Scotland).

An fara gabatar da wani sigar wannan takarda da ta gabata kuma mai bambanci sosai a watan Maris, 2015 ga Jaridar Yale ta Kimiyyar Halittu da Magunguna don yiwuwar haɗawa a cikin fitowarta ta "Sha'awa". Tsarin al'ada shine mujallar ta sami masana biyu su sake duba takarda don bayar da sharhi da suka. Babban batu na 2: Wannan takarda ita ce kawai wurin da aka samu alaƙar Wilson da Gidauniyar Kyauta a wajen ma'aikatan Gidauniyar. A wata ma'anar, editan Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine ne kawai da masu bita biyu suka sani game da wannan alaƙar.

A watan Afrilu, 2015 an aika imel ta wani da ke amfani da sunan karya ("Janey Wilson") zuwa Gidauniyar Taimako da kuma kungiyar da ke dauke da wasu kungiyoyin agaji, gami da Gidauniyar Taimako:

A ranar Laraba, 22 ga Afrilu, 2015 da ƙarfe 9:21 na safe, Janey Wilson < [email protected] > ta rubuta:

Yanzu ina da takardu da ke nuna cewa Gary Wilson da kansa yana da'awar cewa shi memba ne na Gidauniyar Lada . Duk da cewa ba a saka shi a cikin sabon shafin yanar gizon ba, wannan yana nuna babban laifi…. [Ma'aikatan Gidauniyar Lada] wataƙila ba su ma san yana yin waɗannan ikirari ba, ban tabbata ba, amma yanzu ya yi su a bainar jama'a.

Muhimmin Bayani #3: Mutum ɗaya ne kawai daga cikin masu bita biyu da aka gabatar a Mujallar Yale ta Ilimin Halittu da Magunguna ya iya aika wannan imel (An yi amfani da shi daga baya a matsayin ɗaya daga cikin masu bita biyu). Ba a bainar jama'a bayanin ba, amma an ba shi ne kawai ga mujallar.

A lokacin da "Janey" (1) ta rubuta wa Gidauniyar Kyauta don ta gaya mata game da ikirarin da na yi na "ƙarya", kuma (2) ta kai rahoto ga Hukumar Kula da Sadaka ta Scotland, "Janey" ta kuma rubuta wa ƙungiyar Edinburgh inda ƙungiyar agajin ke zaune da ƙarya game da ni da Gidauniyar Kyauta. Ana kiran ƙungiyar Edinburgh "The Melting Pot." Ƙungiyar laima ce da ke ɗaukar nauyin ƙananan kamfanoni daban-daban. Sun ƙunshi hare-haren sirri da aka saba kai wa Wilson (wanda aka bayyana a sama), har ma da barazanar ɗaukar matakin shari'a. Babu wanda ya ɗauki maganganu masu ban mamaki da ikirari marasa tallafi da muhimmanci kuma "Janey" ba ta bayar da shaidar asalinta ba. "Janey" a bayyane take ta buga game da wannan a wani lokaci a dandalin dawo da batsa na redddit/pornfree - Gary Wilson yana cin gajiyar YBOP :

Wannan sama ba abin mamaki ba ne a yayin da Prause ya yi amfani da masu amfani da ƙwaƙwalwa masu yawa don aikawa, da farko a kan batutuwa na batsa, game da Wilson. Alal misali daruruwan maganganun da aka nuna ta hankalin avatars na Prause suna iya samuwa a hanyoyin da ke ƙasa. Kuma, sun kasance ba cikakke tarin ba ne:

Wani post ɗin reddit / mara sa hoto wanda ya bayyana game da lokaci guda (Yi amfani da goge sunan mai amfani da sockpuppet ɗinta, kamar yadda ta saba yi bayan sanyawa):

Janey / Prause ta yi ikirarin cewa ina 'biya' Gidauniyar ba da lada don damar magana da TEDx wanda ya faru shekaru da suka gabata, a cikin 2012. An shirya wannan a 2011, shekaru kafin a fara tunanin sadaka, ko shirya. Babu shakka, ba a buƙatar irin wannan taɓarɓarewar. Ina da hakkin bayar da littafina ga kowane mutum a kowane lokaci, ko sanya shi a cikin aljihu. Na zabi Gidauniyar ba da lada saboda ina mutunta madaidaiciyar manufarta ta ilimi.

Babu wata kungiya (mai kula da ayyukan agaji na Scottish ko Melting Pot) da ta ba da amsa ga "Janey," tunda ba ta bayar da wata shaida ba, kuma ba za ta bayyana kanta ba, tana da'awar "matsayin mai fallasa" (duk da cewa, ba shakka, ba ma'aikaciya ba ce , kuma bai kasance cikin barazana ba). Da a ce sadaka ba ta da ƙarfi, mutunta dangantaka tare da Melting Pot, kuma da an riga an buƙaci ta gabatar da bayanan kuɗi tare da Rean Gudanar da ityaunar Scottan Scotland, “iƙirarin Janey” na iya yin ɓarnar da yawa ga martabar sadaka kuma ta fara cin lokaci, duba kudi mai tsada, da dai sauransu.

A ƙarshen 2016, Prause ta bayyana kanta a matsayin "Janey Wilson" lokacin da ta buƙaci (a kai a kai kuma ba tare da nasara ba) Dan Hind na Commonwealth Publishing ya tabbatar da alaƙata da ƙungiyar agaji ta Scotland da ake kira The Reward Foundation don yin amfani da ita a rubuce. Ta hanyar kwafi MDPI (mawallafin jaridar da aka tattauna a baya) da kuma ƙungiyar ɗabi'a ta wallafe-wallafe (COPE), Prause ta shaida wa Hind ta Commonwealth cewa ya riga ya rubuta mata wannan.

Duk da haka, kawai wasiƙar da Hind ta yi da kowa game da Wilson da Gidauniyar Reward ita ce ta "Janey," kuma ya faɗi hakan a rubuce. Don haka, Prause yanzu ta bayyana kanta a matsayin tsohuwar "Janey." Lokacin da Hind ba ta amsa buƙatun Prause da aka maimaita ba, sai ta nemi bayanin ta hanyar mai tsara gidan yanar gizo na Commonwealth - kamar yadda aka saba, tare da ɓata suna da barazana:

Kuna iya ƙarfafa mai mallakar abun cikin shafin wanda kuka tsara don bayyana cewa an kama marubucinsa yana da'awar "ba da gudummawa" daga littafin da ya shiga aljihunsa. Mista Hind ya kasa amsa tambayoyin da aka yi masa tare da Kwamitin da'a kan yada Labarai. Ina tsammanin ba za ku so sunanku ya kasance cikin damfara irin wannan ba ta kowace hanya.

Da alama littafin ya yi imani da cewa gaskiyar cewa rabon kuɗin da na samu daga littafin yana zuwa ga wata ƙungiyar agaji mai rijista a Scotland, wadda na lissafa a matsayin alaƙata da wasu takardu biyu na ilimi da aka buga a shekarar 2016, yana nufin cewa ina saka hannun jari a aljihuna (daga littafina) - don haka ina da rikicin sha'awa, wanda ake zargin yana da tushe a cikin tunaninta, na janye takardar da na rubuta. Shin akwai wani abu daga cikin wannan da ke da ma'ana dangane da gaskiyar lamarin?

A hakikanin gaskiya, ban zama a kan hukumar sadarwar ba, kuma babu wata sanarwa game da littafin da ya karbe shi saboda sakamakon kyauta. Ba zato ba tsammani, abata na yanzu yana cikin jama'a, kamar yadda aka ambata a duka takardun da na buga a 2016. A takaice dai, babu wani abu da ya ɓoye ko rashin dacewa, kuma babu wani rikici na duk abin da - duk da ikirarin Prause a bayan al'amuran da kuma a fili.

Cikin 'yan kwanaki bayan Nicole Prause (a matsayinta na kanta) ta aika wa MDPI imel don neman su janye Park et al., 2016 , asusun Twitter "pornhelps" ya kai hari ga Mary Sharpe na Gidauniyar Kyauta. A cikin tweet @pornhelps duk sun yarda cewa ita ce Prause:

Prause, wacce ta kammala karatun digiri a Kinsey kuma tsohuwar jami'a, ta kira kanta masanin kimiyyar jijiyoyi, kuma da alama ta fara jami'a kimanin shekaru 15 da suka gabata. Ba da daɗewa ba bayan wannan sakon Twitter mai bayyanawa "pornhelps" ya goge asusun Twitter da gidan yanar gizon sa (pornhelps.com) - kamar yadda ya bayyana ga wasu cewa Prause sau da yawa tana tweeting da wannan asusun kuma tana taimakawa gidan yanar gizon.

Sassan da ke ƙasa na wannan shafin suna ba da misalai na Prause da "pornhelps" a lokaci guda suna kai hari da ɓata sunan wasu daga cikin abubuwan da Prause ta fi so (maza waɗanda ke gudanar da dandalin tattaunawa kan batsa, masu binciken jarabar batsa, editan TIME Belinda Luscombe, wanda ya rubuta labarin murfin Prause bai amince da shi ba):

An sanar da Jaridar Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine game da wannan hali (wanda a bayyane yake ɗaya daga cikin masu bitar su biyu ne ya shiga ciki). Lokacin da aka ba da shawarar cewa Prause na iya zama a bayan waɗannan imel masu ban mamaki da kuma ƙin amincewa da jaridar da farko, editan bai musanta hakan ba. An karɓi takardar nan take… sannan ba a buga ta ba bayan haka, bisa ga iƙirarin cewa ya yi latti don cika wa'adin bugawa don batun "Addiction" na YJBM .

An gabatar da wani nau'in takarda daban, wanda aka sabunta sosai ga mujallar Behavioral Sciences . Bayan wasu zagaye na bita da sake rubutawa, an karɓi takardar a matsayin bita na wallafe-wallafen. Tsarinta na ƙarshe ya bambanta da na asali na YJBM . A lokacin wannan tsari, masu bita ba su ƙasa da 6 sun sake duba takardar ba. Biyar sun amince da ita, wasu kuma sun ba da shawarar yin gyare-gyare, ɗaya kuma ya ƙi ta da ƙarfi (A sake yin bita). A matsayin wani ɓangare na wannan tsari, masu bita sun ba wa marubutan dukkan sharhi (amma ba asalinsu ba). An magance damuwar masu bita sosai, maki bayan maki.

Daga waɗannan tsokaci, ya bayyana cewa "mai sharhi mai tsauri" na takardar Kimiyyar Behavioral ya kuma yi bitar takardar a YJBM. Kimanin kashi ɗaya bisa uku na maki 77 da aka ɗaga ba su da alaƙa da ƙaddamar da Kimiyyar Behavioral kwata-kwata . Sun yi nuni ga kayan da ke nan kawai a cikin sigar farko ta takardar, wacce aka miƙa wa YJBM. A wani lokaci daga baya, Prause ta gabatar da sigar asali ta YJBM ga hukumar kula da harkokin kuɗi (don a janye takardar da aka buga), don haka ta tabbatar da cewa ita ce mutumin da ke bayan imel ɗin "Janey Wilson" masu tayar da hankali.

A yayin da take kai hari ga marubutan jaridar, Nicole Prause ta karya ka'idar ɗabi'a ta Kwamitin Ɗabi'a na Bugawa (COPE) ga masu bita na ilimi sau da yawa. Sashe na 5, a cikin "Jagororin Kan Ayyukan Bugawa Masu Kyau" PDF ( a wannan shafin ) ya tsara dokoki takwas ga masu bita na takwarorinsu. Nicole Prause ta karya aƙalla ƙa'idodi uku na COPE:

(2) Dole ne ƙwararrun masu bita su kiyaye nauyin sirri a cikin tantance rubutun, kuma wannan ya shafi abokan aikin masu bita waɗanda za a iya tambayar su (tare da izinin edita) su ba da ra'ayoyi kan takamaiman sassa.

Kuna yi wa karya asiri. Ta yi amfani da ƙungiyar Wilson tare da Foundation Reward Foundation don tayar da jami'ai na Gidajen Farin Gida da kuma buƙafa littafin Scottish Charity Register tare da zargin ƙarya game da Wilson.

(3) Bai kamata a riƙe ko kwafi rubutun da aka gabatar ba.

Yi amfani da kundin rubutu kuma daga bisani ya mika shi zuwa allon da aka tsara a matsayin wani ɓangare na buƙatar ƙira don ɗauka. (A bayyane yake, ta taba gane cewa an karɓa takarda YJBM da zarar an sake duba ta.)

(4) Bai kamata masu bita da editoci su yi amfani da bayanai, hujjoji, ko fassarori ba, sai dai idan suna da izinin marubutan.

Yi amfani da amfani da takamaiman abun ciki na YJBM gabatarwa a matsayin wani bangare na karyar da take da'awar gudanarwa ba tare da izinin marubuta ba.

Sabuntawa: A watan Mayu, 2018 Prause ta yi wa mawallafin mujallar MDPI (da sauransu) ƙarya cewa, bisa ga takardar da ƙungiyar agaji ta shigar kwanan nan (tare da an cire suna, kamar yadda aka saba), an biya ni kuɗin da aka biya wa wani jami'in agaji. Na aika da iƙirarin Prause ga Darryl Mead, Shugaban Gidauniyar Lada, wanda ya musanta iƙirarin Prause: Duba don takardun.

Sabuntawa ta 2: Tun daga farkon 2019, Park et al ., 2016 an ambato shi ta hanyar wasu takardu sama da 60 da aka yi wa bita kan takwarorinsu , kuma ita ce takarda da aka fi kallo a tarihin mujallar Behavioral Sciences.

Sabunta 3: Gary Wilson ya haɗa da waɗannan lamura a cikin takaddun shigar da kara a cikin Alexander Rhodes gurbata karar a kan Nicole Prause: Nuni # 11: Gida Wilson takaddara (123 shafuka)

Oktoba, 2016 - Yi amfani da wallafe-wallafe a cikin watan Oktoba, 2015 "dakatar da dakatar da" wasika. Wilson ya amsa ta wurin wallafa wasikarsa zuwa lauya lauya.

A ranar 15 ga Oktoba, 2015, Gary Wilson ta sami wasiƙar dakatarwa da dakatarwa daga lauya mai wakiltar Nicole Prause. Shekara guda bayan haka, Prause ta buga wasiƙar dakatarwa da dakatarwa a kan AmazonAWS , kuma ta haɗa ta da ita a ƙarƙashin wata takarda zuwa ga Psychology Today (ta roƙi ƙungiyar ta sake duba manufofin edita). Prause ta yi sharhi a ƙarƙashin takardar sau da yawa tana cewa membobin ƙungiyoyi biyu (IITAP & SASH) duk "suna nuna wariyar jinsi a fili kuma suna cin zarafin masana kimiyya. " A cikin wani rashin jituwa mai ban mamaki, babban shaidar da Prause ta bayar don wannan bayanin bargo shine wasiƙar dakatarwa da dakatarwa da aka aika wa Wilson kawai, wanda aka sake bugawa a ƙasa. Wilson ba memba ne na SASH ko IITAP ba.

Babu wata hanyar da za a faɗi haka: Duk da'awar guda huɗu da ke cikin wasiƙar dakatarwa da yankewa ta sama ƙarya ne. Da'awar da ba ta dace ba ita ce Wilson ya ce Prause ya bayyana a cikin batsa. Gary Wilson ya rubuta wasiƙar da ke tafe yana roƙon Prause da lauyan su bayar da shaida don tallafawa zarginsu. Wasiƙar Wilson cikakke:

A cikin shekaru 6 da ke tsakani ba Prause ko lauya ba su ba da amsa ba. Babu wanda ya ba da wata hujja don tallafawa zargin Prause - saboda zargin ƙarya ne. A bayyane yake cewa motsawar motsa jiki sau uku ne:

- don tsoratar da Wilson don ya cire sahun sa na karatun Prause,
don ƙirƙirar wasiƙar da za ta iya nuna wa ƙawayenta a matsayin “tabbataccen tabbaci” cewa Wilson yana damunta (duk da cewa hujja ce ta babu komai kuma kawai an cika ta)
don samar da "wasiƙar hukuma" don nunawa 'yan jarida don hana su tuntuɓar Wilson.

Sabuntawa (Agusta, 2020): Hukuncin kotu ya fallasa Nicole Prause a matsayin mai laifin, ba wanda aka azabtar ba.

Oktoba, 2016 - Labarai yana da abokin haɗin gwiwa Susan Stiritz "ya gargadi 'yan sandan' yan sanda 'cewa Gary Wilson na iya tashi 2000 mil don sauraron kwarewa ya ce batsa bane ba gaskiya bane

Prause ta ci gaba da yin wani labari da Gary Wilson ta yi barazanar "bayyana" a ɗaya daga cikin tattaunawarta. Wannan abin dariya ne. Prause ba ta bayar da wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan wannan ikirarin ba, kuma Wilson ba ta da sha'awar jin Prause tana magana (balle a biya ta don jin ta yi magana). A tsakiyar watan Oktoba, 2016 Nicole Prause ta sanya wannan PDF ɗin a kan AmazonAWS. Prause ta buga hanyar haɗi zuwa PDF ɗin a ƙarƙashin wata takarda zuwa ga Psychology Today (wadda ke tattara tallafi don roƙon ƙungiyar ta sake duba manufofin edita).

Duk da cewa babu wani abu da aka tabbatar a cikin wannan sakon (a ƙasa) amma da alama Susan Stiritz ce ta rubuta shi. Hakanan da alama yana bayyana Stiritz yana isar da da'awar ƙarya ta Prause ga ɗan sintiri na harabar WU Tim Dennis cewa Gary Wilson yana shirin halartar cibiyar bazara ta AASECT . A taƙaice, an yi iƙirarin cewa Wilson yana shirin tashi mil 2000, ya biya kwana 4 a wani otal a St Louis, kuma ya biya sama da $1000 ga AASECT, kawai don jin Prause da David Ley suna bayanin yadda aka "ɓatar da jarabar batsa." Prause har ma ta ba da hoton Wilson, wanda dole ne ta "sace" shi, saboda bai aiko mata ba (an sake buga shi a ƙasa).

Don haka wannan ita ce "hujja" cewa Gary Wilson yana da haɗari: tatsuniya ce ta Prause, aka gaya wa aboki, wanda ya ba da labarin zuwa kwalejin jami'a mai nisan mil 2000 daga inda Wilson ke zaune ta hanyar saƙon, wanda Prause yanzu ta ba da matsayin "hujja" na ayyukan mugunta na Wilson. Abin da ya ɓace daga duk wannan ƙirar ita ce iota ta shaidar da ke nuna cewa Wilson ya taɓa nuna cewa yana da niyyar halartar laccar lacca - ko tsoratar da ita ta kowace hanya.

Duk da cewa Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa Wilson "mai haɗari ne," haɗarin da ke tattare da samun Wilson a cikin masu sauraro shine cewa, da tambayoyi masu ban tsoro, zai iya musanta ikirarin Prause ta hanyar ambaton takardu sama da 4 na jijiyoyi waɗanda ke goyan bayan tsarin jarabar batsa, da kuma nazarin 120 da ke danganta amfani da batsa da rashin aikin jima'i da ƙarancin gamsuwar jima'i da dangantaka. Wannan shine ainihin dalilin da ya sa ba ta son Wilson ta halarci laccocinta.

Sabuntawa: Gary Wilson ya haɗa waɗannan abubuwan da suka faru a cikin takardar shaidar da aka shigar a cikin ƙarar batanci ta Alexander Rhodes akan Nicole Prause: Nuni na 11: takardar shaidar Gary Wilson (shafuka 123).

Sabuntawa (Agusta, 2020): Hukuncin kotu ya fallasa Nicole Prause a matsayin mai laifin, ba wanda aka azabtar ba.

Abinda ke gudana - Yi amfani da shiru ga mutane tare da buƙatun "babu lamba" na ƙarya da wasiƙu masu ɓoyewa & dakatarwa

Gunaguni yana da tarihin aikawa da dakatar da wasiƙun (C&D) ga mutanen da ke tambayar ta game da maganganun da ba ta tallafi ba. Ta yi iƙirarin cewa ta aika (aƙalla) irin waɗannan wasiƙu guda bakwai, waɗanda ta maimaita ma'anarsu a kan kafofin watsa labarun cewa "babu umarnin lamba." Kotuna da hukumomi ne kawai ke bayar da “umarni,” saboda ana fahimtar wannan kalmar sosai, sannan kawai bayan ba wa ɓangarorin biyu damar sauraro. Rubuta wasiƙun C&D ga duk wanda yayi mata tambayoyi ya zo ne daga lauyanta, ba alƙali ba, kuma da alama an yi niyya don hana zargi da muhawara ta gaskiya.

Mafi muni, bisa kawai aika waɗannan wasikun da ba a tabbatar da su ba, Prause ta nace cewa tana da haƙƙin doka don hana duk wanda ya karɓi irin wannan wasiƙar daga karewa, ko amsawa, maganganunta na kan layi game da su ko wasu - ko da kawai suna so kawai don bayar da shaidar da za ta magance maganganun da ba gaskiya ba. Lokacin da wadanda suka karbi wasikar suka yi kokarin yin magana, sai ta fito fili ta zarge su da cewa “ba sa bin umarnin lamba” da kuma “tursasawa.” Bayyanannen, kuma bayyanannen ƙarya, ma'anar maganganunta shine a nuna cewa waɗannan mutanen suna aiki ba bisa ƙa'ida ba.

A iliminmu, Yin wasa bai taɓa samun kotu ko umarni ba akan duk mai karɓar wasiƙar C & D ba. Dabarun ta na zafin rai da kuma zargin karya da aka sani a maimakon sun bayyana ana kirga su ne don tursasawa da tsoratar da masu zaginta cikin nutsuwa.

Prause ta kuma yi amfani da wani sabon salo na wannan dabarar a kan Rhodes da PornHelp.org , da sauransu ta hanyar kai musu hari da kuma maganganunsu a yanar gizo, to idan suka yi ƙoƙarin gyara ko kare kansu, suna buƙatar a bainar jama'a su "kada su tuntube ta ta kowace hanya." Idan daga baya suka yi ƙoƙarin gyara ƙarya ko kuma suka kira ta, ta zarge su da keta "babu hulɗa" kuma ta yi barazanar kai ƙara. Sannan, duk da buƙatarta, ta ci gaba da kai musu hari ta yanar gizo a nan gaba.

An sake buga wasu wasiƙun C&D da Prause ta buga a yanar gizo ko ta aika a matsayin hotuna a ƙasa. An sanya hanyoyin haɗi zuwa wasiƙun C&D guda uku a shafukanta na Amazon AWS ( C&D 1 , C&D 2 , C&D 3 ), mai yiwuwa don ta iya haɗawa da kowanne cikin sauƙi a cikin tweets, akan Facebook, da kuma sassan sharhi a ƙarƙashin labaran kan layi. A maimaitawa: ba mu san cewa Prause ta taɓa yin aiki akan kowace barazana mai ƙarfi, ko da yake babu komai a cikin waɗannan wasiƙun. Mun yi imanin cewa dabarun tsoratarwa ne, tsarkakakku kuma masu sauƙi. A ƙarshe, waɗanda suka karɓi wasiƙun C&D sun jaddada cewa jerin laifukan da Prause ta yi ƙarya ne. Kowa zai iya biyan lauyan da ke kan layi don ya rubuta wasiƙun C&D marasa tushe.

An sake buga huɗu daga cikin haruffan C&D guda biyar a ƙasa. Wasikar C&D ta 5, da kuma amsar Wilson ga lauyan Prause, suna cikin wannan sashe.

Linda Hatch PhD

Yi magana da aka kira Linda Hatch a matsayin "Ms." maimakon "Dr." a cikin wasikar, (kuskuren da Prause ya sha nanatawa hujja ce mara tabbas game da "misogyny"). Lura cewa Prause ta sa lauyanta ya kwafi editan wani shafin inda Dr. Hatch ke yin talla a kai a kai. Yi aiki da aka buga 4 na dakatarwa & dakatar da haruffa a bayyane akan amazonaws.com. A bayyane yake cewa haruffan C & D sun kasance don "azabtar" ga masu karɓa don yin la'akari da yin la'akari da kuskuren karatun Prause da ƙalubalantar ikirarin da ba a tallata ba.

-------------

----------------

Robert Weiss LCSW, CSAT-S

A cikin wasikar C & D da ke sama Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa Weiss ya ɓatar da hankali ya faɗi cewa Prause ba ta da alaƙar jami'a. Duk da yake babu wata hujja da ta nuna cewa Weiss ya faɗi haka - Fassara ba ta da alaƙa da kowace jami'a.

----------------

Marnia Robinson, JD

Abin sha'awa ne cewa Prause ta zargi Robinson da cewa ba a sake daukar Prause aiki a jami'a ba kuma kwangilarta da UCLA ba ta sabunta ba - lokacin da duka biyun gaskiya ne. Gaskiyar da ke bayan buƙatar Prause da ake kira rashin tuntuɓar ta ta bayyana a sashe na farko na wannan shafin. Tun daga watan Afrilu na 2013 na Prause, buƙatar rashin tuntuɓar Prause da safanta sun buga ɗaruruwan maganganu marasa daɗi a shafukan sada zumunta da sauran wurare. A cikin duniyar da ta karkace, babu laifi a bata suna da kuma cin zarafin wasu, amma babu wanda aka ba wa damar kare kansu daga cin zarafinta.

----------------

Gabe Deem , wanda ya warke daga ED da batsa ya jawo , ya kafa RebootNation , kuma ya wargaza takardar Prause tare da wannan sharhi: Babu wani abu da ya ƙara a cikin Nazarin da ba a sani ba: Matasan da ke cikin ED wanda ba a bayyana ba - na Gabe Deem (2015)

An kwafi waɗannan maganganun ƙarya guda huɗu da ke sama kuma an liƙa su daga C&D na Prause zuwa ga Gary Wilson (duba martanin Wilson ga lauyan Prause ).

Bugu da ƙari, Prause ta yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa ta aika wasiƙun dakatarwa da dakatarwa ga masu tattaunawa guda 4 a cikin shirin Mormon Matters . Prause tana da dogon tarihi na C&D na bogi da kuma bayar da rahoton ƙungiyoyi da daidaikun mutane ga hukumomin gudanarwa.

Sabuntawa: A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2019 Alexander Rhodes (wanda ya kafa reddit/nofap da NoFap.com ) ya shigar da ƙarar ɓata suna a kan Nicole R Prause . Ɗaya daga cikin dalilan da ya sa aka shigar da ƙarar Rhodes shine cewa Prause ya yi iƙirarin cewa yana da umarnin hana shi.

Abinda ke gudana - Yin amfani da kirkirar halitta "infographics" don disparage & ɓata mutane da ƙungiyoyi masu yawa

Prause ta ƙirƙiri "bayanan bayanai" guda biyu a cikin 2016, tana sanya wa Gary Wilson da YBOP suna, wanda ta wallafa sau da yawa a shafinta na Twitter kuma ta buga a Quora da sauran shafuka. Bayanin farko, wanda aka ajiye a shirye a gidan yanar gizon Prause's Amazon , ana kiransa " Sexism In Neuroscience ". Yana ɓata sunan Gary Wilson, Don Hilton, Alex Rhodes da Marnia Robinson ta hanyar kiran duk masu lalata da yara (Ana iya fassara shi a matsayin kiran Don Hilton mai lalata da yara). Kamar yadda aka riga aka rubuta a wani sashe na baya, a sama, kawai "shaidar" Prause ita ce Gary Wilson ya rubuta "Miss" ba da gangan ba a cikin amsarsa ga tambayoyinta game da girman azzakari na Wilson! Sha'awar Prause ga al'aurar Wilson da ƙirƙirarta da misalai da yawa na buga bayanan "jinsi" marasa ma'ana duk an rubuta su anan: Disamba 2013: Yi wa rubuce-rubucen da aka yi a kan YourBrainRebalanced & ya tambayi Gary Wilson game da girman azzakarinsa (yana fara kamfen ɗin Prause na kiran Wilson, da sauransu da yawa, masu lalata da yara).

Na biyu Bayanin bayanan da aka gabatar ya nuna cewa ya zama share fage kan “yadda za a kimanta fina-finan jima'i” (Nuna kalmomin batsa). Idan aka duba da kyau za a ga cewa Prause tana da laifin karya mafi yawan dokokinta don kimanta tushen bayanai. A ƙasan bayanan bayanan ta lissafa rukunin yanar gizo guda 15 da take son mai karatu ya yi imani sune tushen “munanan bayanai” (shafukan da mutane da ƙungiyoyi da yawa ke ɓata suna ko musgunawa a kai a kai, kamar yadda aka rubuta a waɗannan shafukan). Ta kuma jera yanar gizo guda biyu "masu kyau" da daya "mai kyau". Ofashin rubutun tarihin inane:

Shafukan yanar gizo guda biyu masu "kyau" sune shafin yanar gizo na AASECT da na Justin Lehmillers. AASECT ƙungiya ce ta masu ilimin jima'i kuma ba ta ambaci wani bincike a gidan yanar gizon AASECT ba. Justin Lehmiller, mai ba da gudummawa akai-akai ga Mujallar Playboy , kuma abokiyar Nicole Prause , bayan ya nuna ta a cikin aƙalla rubuce-rubuce goma na shafinsa.

"Yanar gizo" ta uku wani ɗan gajeren labari ne daga farkon 2014 a cikin wata mujalla, tana ambaton Prause. Labarin ya ambaci takarda ɗaya kawai ta jijiyoyi: Nazarin EEG na Prause na 2013, Steele et al. , 2013. Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa ta musanta jarabar batsa saboda batsa ta amfani da batutuwa (1) "kwakwalwa ba su amsa kamar sauran masu shan kwayoyi ba," kuma (2) da gaske suna da "babban sha'awa." Dukansu iƙirarin ba su da tallafi . Babu ɗayansu da aka ruwaito a cikin Steele et al., 2013. Gaskiya? Binciken da aka yi wa takwarorinsu na Steele et al. 2013 sun bayyana yadda binciken Steele et al. suka ba da goyon baya ga samfurin jarabar batsa. Labarin na 2014 ya cire nazarin 43 da suka dogara da ilimin halittar kwakwalwa kan masu amfani da batsa da masu shan jima'i (duk suna goyon bayan samfurin jaraba).

A nan mun bayar da misalai na yadda Prause ta wallafa bayanan "fina-finan jima'i" nata. Ta yi hakan sau da yawa a Quora (kafin a dakatar da ita har abada saboda cin zarafin Gary Wilson ). Misali:

https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-believe-in-the-answers-given-on-Quora-What-is-its-authenticity/answer/Nicole-Prause
https://www.quora.com/My-friend-is-addicted-to-porn-How-can-I-help-him/answer/Nicole-Prause
https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-stop-my-porn-addiction-once-and-for-good-I-am-a-female-and-not-lesbian/answers/32510476
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-ill-effects-of-porn/answer/Nicole-Prause

Daya daga cikin abubuwan Quora na sama, misali:

Muna motsa daga Quora zuwa twitter. Yawancin littattafan da aka ba da labarinsa sun hada da ƙarin misalformation da lalacewa:

-----

Ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter a shekarar 2016. Masana a wannan fanni sun karyata ikirarinta da kuma kalaman batanci a cikin wannan gajeren martani - Op-ed: Wanene ainihin ke ɓatar da kimiyya a kan batsa? (2016).

-----

-----

Takardar Ley ba ta yi bita ba. Wani labari mai ban mamaki, mara daidai, mai goyon bayan batsa wanda ya yi kama da ɗaya daga cikin rubuce-rubucen shafin yanar gizo na Ley's Psychology Today (kuma kusan tsayi ɗaya). YBOP ba ta ji buƙatar magance kwararar tunanin Ley da aka buga a cikin Mujallar Nazarin Batsa mai cike da shakku ba. Don cikakken bayani game da kowane batun magana na Ley, YBOP ta ba da shawarar wannan labarin - Rushe martanin David Ley ga Philip Zimbardo: " Dole ne mu dogara da kimiyya mai kyau a cikin muhawarar batsa " (Maris, 2016) , ko wannan babban rusa labarin farfagandar Ley mafi shahara - Sukar " Sarki Ba Ya da Tufafi: Bita na Tsarin 'Addiction na Batsa' " (2014), David Ley, Nicole Prause & Peter Finn.

------

------

Kamar yadda Prause da sunan twitter ɗinta RealYBOP suke yi, duka zaren zaren don buga farfagandar su (a wannan lokacin Matt Fradd):

------

A cikin wannan tweet Prause ba za ta iya sarrafa ƙarfinta na ƙarya ba:

Gaskiya: babu wata "ƙungiyar kimiyya" da ta taɓa yin ƙoƙarin ƙaryata www.yourbrainonporn.com . Lura da yadda Prause bai taɓa bayar da misali ɗaya na abin da ake kira "ƙara" YBOP ba.

-------

Evan Elliot ya kira Kira don zalunci da rashin iyawarsa don magance abu

------

Ta kira Alexander Rhodes (@NoFap) mai son lalata, amma ba ta taɓa bayar da takaddun shaida na lalata ba (ba abin mamaki ba ne domin Prause ta ɓata wa Rhodes suna da kuma cin zarafinsa tsawon shekaru 4 a jere, kamar yadda aka rubuta a waɗannan shafukan). Har ma ta yi rubutu a shafin Twitter cewa ta ba da rahoton "mai son lalata" Alexander Rhodes ga FBI. Ta yi ƙarya. Duba - Disamba, 2018: FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Nicole Prause ta yi ƙarya game da shigar da rahoto kan Alexander Rhodes.

Takardar da ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter mai suna "Chama" ta danganta da rubutun da ɗalibi mai digiri na biyu Kris Taylor ya rubuta game da tsokaci 15 daga reddit/nofap: Ina son a dawo da wannan ikon: Jawabin maza a cikin wani dandalin tattaunawa kan batsa ta yanar gizo (2018). Haka ne, PhD yana nazarin tsokaci 15 na reddit! Taylor hakika yana goyon bayan batsa da kuma adawa da Nofap. Yana da tarihin yin ba daidai ba a kan nazarin da kuma yanayin binciken, kamar yadda aka rubuta a cikin sharhin YBOP: Yin watsi da "Kaɗan Gaskiya Masu Tauri Game da Batsa da Rashin Daidaito a Jima'i" na Kris Taylor (2017) . A ƙarƙashin wani labari mai ban sha'awa na David Ley akan dandalin murmurewa na batsa, Prause da "bart" suna muhawara kan fa'idodin yin ba daidai ba a cikin rubutun Taylor a matsayin "tunani mai zurfi." Bart ya fallasa Prause a matsayin yin ba daidai ba a cikin takardar Taylor.

------

Gudanar da asusun twitter na wasu:

------

Kada a taɓa ba da misalai na “karkatar da iliminmu”…. ba:

Wannan PDF ɗin ya ƙunshi sharhi 19 na Prause Quora da ke ɓata mini suna da kuma ɓata mini suna (gami da sharhi 10 a cikin awanni 24, wanda ya haifar da haramtawa Quora yin Prause) . PDF ɗin ya kuma ƙunshi sharhi daga laƙabi 5 na Prause da ake amfani da su don cin zarafi da kuma cin zarafi na.

------

Sauran - Oktoba, 2016: Yi amfani da faɗar ƙarya cewa SASH da kuma IITAP "mambobin kwamitin da masu aikata aiki suna nuna jima'i da jima'i da zalunci ga masana kimiyya”(Jim Pfaus ya shiga tare da kara bata sunansa)

A ranar 12 ga Oktoba, 2016, an buga wata takarda ga Psychology Today (ta roƙi ƙungiyar ta sake duba manufofinta na edita) a kan "petitionbuzz.com" Washegari Nicole Prause & Jim Pfaus sun buga sharhi huɗu a ƙarƙashin takardar. Prause & Pfaus sun rubuta wannan takarda tare (ba ainihin bincike ba ne), cewa suna da'awar cewa an karyata ED ɗin batsa. Takardu biyu da aka yi wa bita a kan takwarorinsu ( takarda 1 , takarda 2 ) da kuma suka uku sun ce akasin haka ( 1 , 2, 3 ). Kamar yadda bincike 35 suka haɗa amfani da batsa da matsalolin jima'i ko ƙarancin sha'awa. A ƙarƙashin takardar, Jim Pfaus ya kira SASH da IITAP "ƙungiyoyin jaraba" da "masu sayar da mai na maciji" (Pfaus ba mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali ba ne). Ya kuma yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa babu "babu wani ilimin kimiyya na asibiti ko na halitta wanda ke tallafawa jarabar batsa ko mummunan tasirin amfani da batsa ."

Pfaus ba ya faɗin gaskiya: Nazarin jijiyoyi 50 & sake dubawa 25 na wallafe-wallafen sun goyi bayan tsarin jarabar batsa, kuma bincike 120 sun danganta amfani da batsa da rashin aikin jima'i da ƙarancin gamsuwar jima'i da dangantaka. Babu wani bincike na jijiyoyi da ya ƙaryata tsarin jarabar batsa, gami da wannan . Akwai lambobi a cikin ICD da DSM waɗanda ke ba da damar gano cututtukan da za a iya sake biya, kuma an ba da shawarar "rashin lafiyar halayen jima'i na tilastawa" don haɗawa a cikin ICD-11. Lura: Kamar Prause, Jim Pfaus yana da tarihin ɓatar da binciken, har ma da yin maganganun ƙarya - kamar yadda ya yi a nan game da Prause & Pfaus 2015.

Sabuntawa (2019): Rahotannin labarai sun nuna Jim Pfaus a matsayin wanda ya shafe shekaru yana aikata munanan dabi'u na jima'i da ƙananan ɗalibai mata. Karin bayani :

Maɓuɓɓuka suna zane hoto na farfesa wanda suka yi imani akai-akai ƙetare iyakokin da suka dace tare da ɗalibansa.

gungun daliban da suka kammala karatunsu sun tunkari wasu farfesoshin ilimin halin dan Adam na Concordia wadanda suke kula da sashen. Sun gabatar da korafin korafi game da zargin lalatawar Pfaus tare da daliban karatun digiri a azuzuwan da ya koyar.

An sa Pfaus akan izinin gudanarwa, daga nan sai ya fita daga jami'a. Ironsi na Pfaus laccoci mai lasisi therspists game da jima'i.

A kan Nikky. A cikin jawabin da ya ba da amsa, Prause ya maimaita wa 'yan uwan Pfaus kira "IITAP / CSAT's" masu sayar da man maciji. Yanzu wannan bincike ne mai son zuciya.

Nicole Prause ta buga ƙarin sharhi 3, ciki har da wannan inda ta yi iƙirarin cewa duk membobin IITAP da SASH "masu nuna wariyar jinsi a fili" kuma "masu kai hari ga masana kimiyya":

Wace shaida ce Prause ta bayar don gurfanar da dukkan membobin waɗannan manyan ƙungiyoyi guda biyu masu girma da bambancin ra'ayi, tana zargin su da "cin zarafin jinsi da kai hari ga masana kimiyya?" Rubutun Prause ya haɗa hanyoyin haɗi zuwa ga iƙirarinta na ƙarya game da Gary Wilson (wanda aka bayyana a sama). Tunda Wilson ba memba bane na kowace ƙungiya, abin mamaki ne yadda maganganun Prause game da Wilson suka ɗora wa sama da masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali, PhD, likitoci da masana ilimin halayyar ɗan adam na waɗannan ƙungiyoyi biyu laifi. Har yanzu, muna da iƙirarin kumburi da ɓata suna ba tare da wata shaida ba. Duba waɗannan shafuka daban-daban suna fallasa Prause a matsayin mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka azabtar ba:

Bayan 'yan misalai Yi amfani da lalata SASH akan twitter:

Tashin hankali marar fahimta, wanda ya hada da dukan shaidarta:

Shaidarta daya tak da ke nuna cewa "misogyny" ita ce Gary Wilson da take rubuta “Miss” ba da gangan ba - bayan Prause tayi tambaya game da girman azzakarin Wilson.

------

Ƙarin ƙarya, kuma ba misalai:

-------

An yi amfani da IITAP da Stefanie Carnes a game da 100 tweets (wanda ke cika wannan shafi). Bayanan misalai:

------

A kan zaren IITAP, zargin IITAP da "lafazin lalacewa":

Ina tsammanin tana tsammanin babu wanda zai karanta, kamar yadda yake cewa alaƙa, ba dalili ba. Na biyu, Prause ba ta da ɗaliban digiri. Na uku, binciken - Tsarin Kwakwalwa da Haɗin Aiki da ke da alaƙa da Amfani da Batsa: Kwakwalwa akan Batsa ( Kuhn & Gallinat, 2014).

------

Kada ku ji tsoro - Ba da labari " Me yasa har yanzu muke damuwa game da kallon batsa? ", ta Marty Klein, Taylor Kohut, da Nicole Prause (2018)

------

Babu IITAP ba:

------

Harasses Rob Weiss, wanda sau da yawa ya gabatar a IITAP:

------

Ofayan tweets 5 game da IITAP ranar 9 ga Mayu… duk yanzu an share su:

Ba abin da muka ji ba.

Quora ta goge "amsar" da ke sama ta Prause, ta yi mata gargaɗi, kuma a ƙarshe ta haramta ta.

------

Aiki a matsayin ɗaya, Yi wa littattafan Dauda Lew na David Ley rubutun labaran IITAP. An cire shafin yanar gizo ta Psychology Yau:

-------

Tags IITAP a cikin wani labarin da ba shi da dangantaka da jima'i ko jita-jita. Hanyar daidaitawa, haɗe tare da cyber-stalking:

-------

Yi aiki ya ƙirƙiri tambari don tursasa mambobin IITAP akan twitter: "Ina FAP (al'aura) a gaban IITAP"

-------

Babu Yaudara, amma Fuskantarwa sun gabatar da da'awar ɓataccen ra'ayi (kamar yadda ake amfani da shi sau da yawa) tare da mujallar, suna da'awar bayanan ba daidai bane. An tilasta wa Jaridar da mai wallafa damar bincika abubuwan da aka tabbatar - kuma ba su sami komai ba game da iƙirarinta. Babu wanda ya taɓa yin hakan. Ko ta yaya, Labaran twitter na ƙarya da ya danganci wannan abin da ya faru:

David Ley ya shiga tare da wasikar blog wanda aka cire daga Psychology Yau:

------

Harassmentarin tsoratarwa game da sharhi na shekara 2 na Prause & Pfaus, 2015:

Wani:

Prause & Pfaus 2015? Ba bincike ne kan maza masu ED ba. Ba bincike ne kwata-kwata ba. Madadin haka, Prause ta yi iƙirarin tattara bayanai daga bincikenta na baya guda huɗu, babu ɗaya daga cikinsu da ya magance matsalar rashin ƙarfin mazakuta. Abin damuwa ne cewa wannan takarda ta Nicole Prause da Jim Pfaus ta wuce bita na takwarorinsu saboda bayanan da ke cikin takardarsu ba su yi daidai da bayanan da ke cikin binciken huɗu da takardar ta yi iƙirarin dogara da su ba. Bambance-bambancen ba ƙananan gibi ba ne, amma gibi ne masu gibi waɗanda ba za a iya haɗa su ba. Bugu da ƙari, takardar ta yi iƙirari da dama waɗanda ba gaskiya ba ne ko kuma ba a tallafa musu da bayanansu ba. Prause & Pfaus 2015 kamar yadda waɗannan suka nuna, ba za ta iya tallafawa iƙirari ɗaya da ta yi ba, gami da iƙirarin Prause cewa sun auna martanin jima'i:

A cikin wannan jarida kamar takarda: Harafi ga editan Richard A. Isenberg MD (2015)
Very m lay critique: Babu wani abu da yake ƙarawa a cikin Nazari na Dubious: Matasan 'Yan Matasa' ED '' Yancin Baƙi (2015)

------

Unintelligible, bazuwar:

------

Goes bayan Patrick Carnes, wanda ya kafa IITAP:

------

Goes bayan Stefanie Carnes, shugaban IITAP:

------

Ya tafi bayan Patrick Carnes, wanda ya kafa IITAP, kuma:

Karkashin wannan zaren Carnes din, inda yake ambaton wasikar ta mai lamba 240:

Matsala: Duk abin da ke cikin wasiƙar Prause mai kalmomi 240 zuwa Lancet an karyata shi gaba ɗaya a cikin wannan sharhi mai zurfi: Binciken "Bayani ba ya goyon bayan jima'i a matsayin jaraba" ( Previous et al ., 2017) . Har ila yau - Ra'ayoyin kwararru na gaske game da jarabar batsa/jima'i? Wannan jerin ya ƙunshi bita da sharhin wallafe-wallafe 25 na baya-bayan nan daga wasu manyan masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi a duniya. Duk suna goyon bayan tsarin jaraba.

-------

Yi amfani da hoton hoton Stefanie Carnes akan Sashen Matsalar Halayyar Jima'i (CSBD) na ICD-11 (ba za ku iya karanta sharhin ba sai kun ƙirƙiri sunan mai amfani)

An yi wannan tsokaci a cikin martani ga yawancin maganganun Nicole Prause inda Prause ta kai hari ga masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali da ƙungiyoyi (IITAP, SASH, ASAM) saboda zargin "cin gajiya daga jima'i da jarabar batsa." Prause ta shafe shekaru 4 da suka gabata tana yin rubutu a kan daftarin beta na ICD-11, tana ƙoƙarin hana ganewar CSBD shiga cikin littafin ƙarshe. A gaskiya ma, Prause ta buga sharhi fiye da kowa da kowa. (Ƙoƙarinta ya gaza, kamar yadda "Rashin Halayyar Jima'i Mai Wuya ." yanzu yana cikin ICD-11)

Sabuntawa: Nicole Prause da Daniel Burgess sun ƙirƙiri RealYBOP twitter ( @BrainOnPorn ) da realyourbrainonporn.com a matsayin kayan aiki don kai hari ga kwakwalwarka akan batsa, Gary Wilson, da duk wanda ke sukar masana'antar batsa ko kuma yana nuna mummunan tasirin amfani da batsa . Duba waɗannan shafuka 2 waɗanda ke ɗauke da ƙarin tweets da yawa ta hanyar Prause suna kai hari da wulaƙanta IITAP da SASH:

Sabuntawa - Masu ilimin jima'i guda uku (membobin IITAP), da kuma farfesa wanda ya rubuta takardu tare da membobin IITAP, sun shigar da kara a cikin karar batanci da Don Hilton ya shigar kan Nicole Prause:

Wanene mai satar yanar gizo lokacin da Prause da sunan ta RealYBOP suka yi tweet fiye da sau 1oo game da IITAP ko Carnes, yayin da IITAP & Carnes ba su taɓa yin tweet game da Prause ko asusunta na masana'antar batsa ba?

**Sauran - Nuwamba, 2016: Yin kukan tambaya Mataimakon mujallar mujallar cututtukan cututtuka Keren Landman, MD don goyan bayan Prop 60 (kwaroron roba a batsa)**

Dokar California 60 za ta tilasta amfani da kwaroron roba a fina-finan batsa. Gidauniyar Kula da Lafiya ta AIDS (AHF) ce ta tallafa masa, wata kungiya mai zaman kanta mai kula da cutar HIV/AIDS da kuma kare hakkin dan adam, kuma masu samar da batsa sun yi adawa sosai da ita, kuma abin sha'awa, Nicole Prause da abokin aikinta David Ley. A lokacin zaben 2016, Prause da Ley sun yi kama da sun damu da kayar da Prop 60, alhali ba su damu da manyan batutuwa kamar kula da lafiya, shige da fice, ko ayyuka ba. Dukansu Prause da Ley sun yi ƙoƙari sosai wajen yin tweet da sake aika sakonnin Twitter a kan Prop 60, da kuma goyon bayan Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana , bangaren da ke fafutukar kare haƙƙin masana'antar batsa ( tweet1 , tweet2 , tweet3 , tweet4 , tweet5 , tweet6 , tweet7 , tweet8 , tweet9 , tweet10 , tweet11 - LURA: Prause ta goge duk waɗannan sakonnin). Misali ɗaya na Prause tana goyon bayan masana'antar batsa:

Har ma David Ley ya rubuta wani labarin Psychology Today wanda ya yi Allah wadai da Shawara ta 60: Kwaroron roba a cikin Batsa: Magani a Neman Matsala . Karin Tweets daga Prause don tallafawa masana'antar batsa:

Gunawa ya bamu damar sanin yadda ta zabe:

----

A cikin jerin sakonnin Twitter , Prause ya haɗu da wani "babba ɗan wasan kwaikwayo" wajen kai hari ga wani likita mai suna Keren Landman, likitan da ya ƙware a fannin cututtuka masu yaɗuwa.

A ra'ayin Prause mai daraja, ya kamata mujallar VICE ta kori ƙwararre Dr. Landman saboda rubuta wani labarin da ke goyon bayan Prop 60:

Mai zaman kansa? Duk da cewa digirin Prause yana cikin kididdiga, Keren Landman MD mai bincike ce, likitan cututtuka, kuma ƙwararriyar cuta ce da ta taɓa aiki a Cibiyar Kula da Cututtuka ta Amurka. Kamuwa da cutar HIV yana ɗaya daga cikin ƙwarewarta, bayan ta buga takardu da dama a fagen. Har yanzu, muna da Prause tana kai hari ga ƙwararru a wani fanni, yayin da a lokaci guda ta kasa tallafawa matsayinta da hujjoji na gwaji. (Shin akwai wanda ya yarda da iƙirarin Prause cewa " kowane masanin kimiyya mai zaman kansa yana goyon bayan prop 60"?) Duk abin da kowa ke tunani game da Prop 60, matsayin Dr. Landman bincike ne ke tallafawa , kuma Nicole Prause ba haka ba ne.

Tambayar ta rage: Me yasa duka Prause da Ley suke irin waɗannan masu goyon baya na masana'antar batsa, kuma suna da sha'awar kai hari ga kowa da duk wanda ya ba da shawarar yin amfani da batsa ko jima'i ba tare da kwaroron roba ba na iya haifar da matsala? Hankali a cikin wadannan hanyoyin guda biyu:

Sauran - Nuwamba, 2016: Yi da'awar ƙarya cewa sun aika wasiƙu na daina & dakatar da wasiƙun ga 4 panelists a kan Mormon Matters Podcast (Don Hilton, Stefanie Carnes, Alexandra Katehakis, Jackie Pack)

A ranar 10 ga Nuwamba, 2016, "Mormon Matters" ta buga shirin podcast mai zuwa: 353–354: Jagoranci Tsarin "Addiction" tare da Game da Batsa/Addiction na Jima'i . Amsa ce ga wani shirin podcast na Mormon Matters da ya gabata (kashi na 347–348) inda Prause da masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali guda uku suka yi iya ƙoƙarinsu don kawar da jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i. A cikin shirin Podcast 353–354, mai masaukin baki na Mormon Matters, Dan Wotherspoon, ya haɗu da masu tattaunawa guda huɗu: Jackie Pack (LCSW, CSAT–S, CMAT), Alexandra Katehakis (MFT, CSAT-S, CST-S), Stefanie Carnes (Ph.D., CSAT-S), da Donald Hilton (MD).

Cikin 'yan mintuna kaɗan bayan fara shirin, Nicole Prause da kuma, a bayyane, 'yan tsana na safa ("Skeptic", "Rashin ƙwarewa a kan kwamitin", "Danny") sun wallafa tsokaci goma sha biyu suna kai hari ga mahalarta taron guda huɗu. Jay Blevins da Natasha Helfer-Parker (biyu daga cikin masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali waɗanda suka yi aiki tare da Prause a kan shirye-shiryen 347-348) sun haɗu da su a bikin tallata ta. A cikin 'yan kwanaki masu zuwa, Prause, Jay Blevins, da Natasha Helfer-Parker sun buga ƙarin tsokaci da dama na tallata ta . Nicole Prause ta buga ƙaryarta ta yau da kullun game da Gary Wilson tana satar hotuna, dole ne ta kulle dakin gwajinta, da kuma "ƙarfafa gidanta" (watakila ta sanya mafakar bam don kare ta daga rubuce-rubucen blog mara kyau). Hakanan, a cikin ɗaya daga cikin tsokaci da yawa, Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa:

Ta aika da wasikun Cease & Desist ga mambobin kwamitin
Biyu daga cikin kwamitocin na yanzu suna karkashin binciken APA

Yi amfani da sharhi:

Mun tuntubi kwamitocin, kuma an tabbatar da cewa:

Babu panelist da ya karbi dakatar da wasiƙa daga Dr. Prause, da kuma
Babu APC (kungiyar Aminiya ta Amirka) da aka tuntubi komitin.

Kuma, muna da shaidar cewa Nicole Prause tana yin maganganun ƙarya. Kuma a ce Prause ta aika da wasiƙun dakatarwa da dakatarwa? Ba zai zama shaidar komai ba, domin kowa zai iya biyan lauya don ya aika da wasiƙar dakatarwa da dakatarwa ta bogi (kamar yadda ake yi wa Prause ).

Sabuntawa : Duk sharhi da yawa da ke ƙarƙashin shirin podcast: 353–354, gami da wasu masu ɓatanci da Prause ta yi, sun ɓace a ɓoye. Shin wannan wani misali ne na Prause tana ƙoƙarin tsaftace hotonta na jama'a?

updates:

Nicole Prause a matsayin "PornHelps" (akan Twitter, gidan yanar gizo, sassan sharhi). Asusun da aka share sau ɗaya An yi amfani da Prause a matsayin "PornHelps"

Nicole Prause ta ƙirƙiri sunan mai amfani da ake kira "PornHelps" , wanda ke da nasa asusun twitter (@pornhelps) da kuma gidan yanar gizo da ke tallata masana'antar batsa da kuma nazarin da aka zaɓa da aka ba da rahoton tasirin "tasiri" na batsa. "PornHelps" na Prause ya yi wa mutane da ƙungiyoyi da Prause ke kai hari akai-akai barazana. A zahiri, Prause za ta haɗu da sunan ta PornHelps don kai hari ga mutane a Twitter da wasu wurare tare da sauran asalin ta. Wasu daga cikin hare-haren da aka tsara na Prause/PornHelps an rubuta su a cikin waɗannan sassan shafin Prause:

Shafin yanar gizo na @pornhelps da kuma Yanar Gizo PornHelps an shafe su ba zato ba tsammani a lokacin da aka bayyana wannan Fitawa ne mutum ya biyo baya. Duk da yake yawancin mu da ake kaiwa hari sun san "PornHelps" na gaske Nicole Prause, wannan @pornhelps tweet bar babu shakka:

Prause, wacce ta kammala karatun digiri a Kinsey, ta kira kanta masanin kimiyyar jijiyoyi, kuma da alama ta fara jami'a kimanin shekaru 15 kafin tweet ɗin da aka yi a sama na 2016. Dangane da hare-haren talla da dama da "PornHelps" suka kai, wanda ya yi daidai da yawancin maganganun da Prause ya saba yi, an fuskanci "PornHelps" a sashin sharhi na Psychology Today tare da wannan da sauran shaidu: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/comment/887468#comment-887468

Cikin 'yan kwanaki bayan sharhin da aka yi a sama, shafin yanar gizo na PornHelps da asusun Twitter na @pornhelps sun ɓace ba tare da wata alama ba ( PDF mai shafuka 80 na sunayen laƙabi da yawa da aka yi amfani da su don ɓata sunan Gary Wilson ). Duk abin da ya rage na PornHelps kaɗan ne na sharhi a shafuka daban-daban da kuma wannan asusun disqus da aka yi watsi da shi (yana lissafa sharhi 87).

Kana son karin tabbacin cewa PornHelps ya yi amfani da gaske? Wadannan kalmomi, tweets, da daidaituwa sun sa ya bayyana.

------------

Anan Yi wasa da Russell J. Stambaugh a lokaci guda suna yin sharhi a ƙarƙashin wani labarin game da batsa. Yi amfani & Stambaugh abokai ne na kut-da-kut kuma galibi suna yin sharhi tare a cikin shirin kai hare-hare a cikin sassan sharhi.

An rubuta sabon harin da Prause, Stambaugh, da wasu membobin ƙungiyar cin zarafin Prause guda 3 suka kai a cikin wannan sashe: 30 ga Mayu, 2018 - Prause ta zargi FTND da zamba ta kimiyya, kuma tana nuna cewa ta kai rahoton Gary Wilson ga FBI sau biyu . (Ƙarin bayani: Gary Wilson ya shigar da buƙatar 'yancin samun bayanai ga FBI kuma FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Prause tana ƙarya: babu wani rahoto da aka taɓa shigar a kan Wilson. Duba - Nuwamba, 2018: FBI ta tabbatar da zamba ta Nicole Prause game da da'awar bata suna )

------------

Yawancin wannan harin da aka kai wa masu bincike na Prause/PornHelps an rubuta shi a nan: Yuni, 2016: Prause da yar tsanarta ta saƙa PornHelps sun yi iƙirarin cewa masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi masu daraja 'yan ƙungiyar "masu adawa da batsa" ne kuma "kimiyyarsu ba ta da kyau" . Amma bari mu sake duba shaidar da ke nuna cewa Prause "PornHelps" ne.

Nicole Prause, wacce ta kammala karatun digiri a Kinsey, a cikin wani rubutu da ta yi a shafinta na Twitter game da wannan binciken da aka wallafa don yin sharhi (tun lokacin da aka buga a cikin Neuropsychopharmacology ), ta yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa masu bincikenta guda 9 (ciki har da manyan masu bincike a fannin ilimin halayyar jaraba) membobin “ƙungiyoyin hana batsa ne,” kuma sabon bincikensu “mummunan kimiyya ne.” Tweet ɗin Prause (wanda aka nuna a nan) ya bayyana a shafi ɗaya da binciken ( Shin batsa zai iya zama jaraba? Nazarin fMRI na maza da ke neman magani don amfani da batsa masu matsala) , amma daga baya an goge shi.

A daidai lokacin da Prause ta wallafa a shafin Twitter na sama, "PornHelps" ta fara wallafawa a sashin sharhi a ƙasan takardar. Wasu daga cikin sharhin PornHelps a ƙasa. Ta yaya PornHelps ta san abubuwa da yawa game da hanyoyin bincike da ƙididdiga? (Prause's PhD yana cikin ƙididdiga):

-

-

-----------

Kuma a nan ya fi tabbacin cewa PornHelps yana da kyan gani. Hotunan PornHelps a karkashin wani shirin NPR na Prause sun kasance kamar Kalmomin da aka saba amfani dashi game da abin da ake amfani da shi na batsa:

Kusan iri ɗaya a cikin wannan labarin yana ambaton Prause - tare da yadda ta saba:

------------

Yanzu dandano na Prause (kamar yadda PornHelps) ke kaiwa Wilson a kan shafukan yanar gizo daban-daban: inganta batsa da ɓarna a halin yanzu na binciken. (Lura: PornHelps yana aiki sosai akan wasu a kan PT da wasu shafuka, kuma ba shakka, ta hanyar Twitter).

Pornhelps da ke zuwa bayan madubin Wilson sun yi amfani da yaren Fassara a cikin maganganu da yawa (“stalker,” “mai warkar da tausa,” “na jabu,” da sauransu)

Duba saba? Gunaguni shine kadai sharhin da ya kira Wilson wani cyberstalker da kuma likita mai wariyar launin fata (wanin ta dan wasan David Ley):

------------

A nan PornHelps yana tattaunawa kan nazarin EEG na Prause - Sauya Abubuwan Da Za Su Iya Daɗewa Ta Hanyar Hotunan Jima'i a cikin Masu Amfani da Matsaloli da Sarrafawa Ba Su Dace da "Addinin Batsa" ( Yi Amfani da al. , 2015)

Pornhelps san wani mummunan yawa ga batsa masana'antu hack!

------------

Ana iya samun wannan sharhi game da Wilson a ƙarƙashin littafin Prause na 2016 na op-ed - Op-ed: Shirin makarantar hana batsa ya ɓatar da kimiyya.

Kuma, Prause shine kawai mai sharhi wanda ya kira Wilson mai amfani da yanar gizo da kuma mai ba da shawara kan tausa (wani abokinsa David Ley). Gaskiyar labarin Prause - Op-ed: Wanene ainihin ke ɓatar da kimiyya a kan batsa? (2016)

------------

Wadannan suna daga cikin maganganun sama da 20 a ƙarƙashin Fuskantar da PornHelps yayi. Yi amfani da sha'awar # 2 bayan Gary Wilson shine FTND, wanda Prause yayi tweeting game da sau 100. Abubuwan da aka faɗi daidai da madubi Yi amfani da tweets suna ɓatar da bincike da kai hari FTND.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

PornHelps ya ambaci wannan binciken Australiya wanda ya yi amfani da Tweets a duk lokacin:

-

-

-

-

-

Anan PornHelps yayi madubi da yawa na Tweets ko tsokaci - duka suna suna ainihin binciken daidai daga binciken waje.

-

------------

Wani misali na Prause / PornHelps sun kai hari ga Wilson (yayin haɗa kai tare da David Ley). Za'a iya samun karin misalai da yawa akan wannan shafin.

Bugu da ƙari, Prause ta goge "PornHelps" twitter da gidan yanar gizo, amma daga baya ta tayar da asusun masana'antar batsa a matsayin RealYourBrainOnPorn.

Sauran - Disamba 12, 2016: Yi aiki ya yi iƙirarin cewa @Nofap ya kai gayarin yara zuwa jin daɗi (kuma ana kiran Alexander Rhodes "mai cin ribar batsa").

Shafin Twitter na Prause ya danganta da wani shiri na rediyo game da Shaidun Jehobah da cin zarafin jima'i , wanda ya ƙunshi wani ɓangare game da wani matashi ɗan luwaɗi ɗan shekara 14 wanda mahaifiyarsa ta sami tarin mujallun batsa. Tunda kasancewarsa ɗan luwaɗi ya saɓa wa koyarwar JW, cocin ta dage cewa matashin ɗan luwaɗi bai sake yin lalata da hotunan maza ba. Matashin ɗan luwaɗi ya yi tunanin kashe kansa saboda ɗan luwaɗi ne da ya makale a cikin JW yana fuskantar ainihin tsammanin korarsa daga cocin kuma iyalinsa da abokansa suka ƙi shi. Sashen rediyo bai ambaci NoFap ba. Ga sakon Prause (lura cewa David Ley ne kawai ya so shi):

Murmushin murkushe mara tushe na Prause da kokarin lalata NoFap dangane da abin da ya faru wanda ba shi da alaƙa ya nuna har zuwa lokacin da ta yarda ta shimfiɗa gaskiya don bin manufarta. NoFapTeam ya amsa tare da tatsuniyoyin 3:

Ba wai kawai ba, an buga wani labari mai cike da cece-kuce game da NoFap, wanda ke ɗauke da Nicole Prause, kwanaki kaɗan bayan haka ta hanyar Medical Daily . Tabbas Prause ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter, tana cewa " da'awar da masana kimiyya suka karya. " Ta hanyar "masana kimiyya" Prause tana nufin kanta. Wannan yana nuna cewa Prause tana da mutane da yawa a kafofin watsa labarai, kuma tana amfani da su don amfaninta. Prause kuma ta kira NoFap "woo woo da ƙungiyar asiri." Marubuciyar Jaridar Medical Daily Lizette Borreli ta yi nisa har ta sanya wa NoFap suna "ƙungiyar adawa da jinsi." Duk wanda ya ziyarci Nofap ya san cewa babu abin da zai iya zama nesa da gaskiya. Mutane da yawa suna gwaji da NoFap don sake dawo da ayyukansu na jima'i. NoFap ta yanke shawarar daidaita tarihin tare da wasu tweets nata ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ), gami da wannan:

Har yanzu, Prause ta haɗu da David Ley don ɓata sunan Alexander Rhodes, Nofap (tare da gidan yanar gizon Gary Wilson da RebootNation). Ta bayyana sha'awarta ta dogon lokaci game da Rhodes, Prause ta wallafa hotunan allo guda 4 daga cikin shekaru 3 da suka gabata:

---------

Tabbatar da alama cewa yin amfani da tweets game da NoFap da Alexander Rhodes fiye da yadda ta yi game da binciken kansa. Yi wa'adin ikirarin zama malamin likita. Wani masanin kimiyyar kiristanci zai fita daga hanyar kira wani saurayi da ke dawowa daga batsa mai karfi ya yi amfani da maƙaryaci, musamman ma ba tare da shaida ba? Halayyar zane? Cin da ka'idojin APA?

updates:

NoFap wanda ya kirkiro Alexander Rhodes ya gurfanar da Nicole Prause / Liberos
David J Ley yanzu masana'antar batsa suna biyan shi don inganta gidajen yanar gizon su, yayin da ya nuna ƙin yarda da illolin batsa. Duba - Yanzu haka David J. Ley yana biyan diyyar masana'antar batsa Xhamster don inganta rukunin yanar gizon sa kuma ya shawo kan masu amfani cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i sune tatsuniyoyi.

Disamba, 2016: A cikin amsa Quora Prause ya gaya wa mai shan tabar wiwi don ziyarci karuwancin (cin zarafi na APA da California)

A ƙasa akwai hoton allo na amsar asali ta Prause da aka buga don amsa wannan tambayar Quora: Ta yaya zan iya shawo kan jarabar batsa da/ko batsa? Waɗanne hanyoyi ne mafi kyau? Yayin da aka rubuta rubutun Prause a watan Satumba, 2016, an ƙara yaɗa wanzuwarsa a cikin wannan rubutun blog na IITAP na 14 ga Disamba wanda ya mayar da martani ga sanarwar AASECT cewa jarabar batsa da jima'i tatsuniya ne. (Bayan haka an goge amsar Prause ta asali .) Ga sakin layi daga amsar IITAP wanda ya danganta da rubutun Prause Quora. (Ku tuna cewa Prause wani muhimmin mutum ne wajen yaudarar ƙaramin rukunin masu ilimin AASECT cewa an yi watsi da jarabar batsa da jima'i - ba haka lamarin yake ba ).

A gefe guda, yawancin likitoci suna nuna damuwa cewa mutanen da suke yin haɗari da jima'i suna shawo kan magungunan ma'aurata wadanda ba tare da fahimta ba ko cikakkun fahimtar waɗannan batutuwa suna warware matsalar matsalolin wadannan alamu, don haka rubuta takarda na halayen mata da maza alamu kamar yadda al'ada da wadanda basu dace ba, har ma suna nuna cewa al'amurran 'yan kasuwa suna da alaka da halin su game da jima'i fiye da jima'i kanta. Wannan ra'ayi yana da haɗari ga abokan ciniki waɗanda ke samunwa da rarraba STD tare da abokan hulɗa da / ko rasa auren, ayyuka da kuma ilmantarwa saboda bayanin kansa da aka nuna amfani da batsa da yawa, ƙuƙwalwar kan layi da sauransu.

Misali, ka yi la'akari da shafin yanar gizo da aka buga kwanan nan daga wani sanannen mai bincike, kuma memba na sashen AASECT wanda ya ba da shawarar cewa wani mai sha'awar batsa ya je ya ga mai yin jima'i maimakon yin lalata da batsa (tun lokacin da aka cire wannan labarin). Daga mahangar ilimi ta IITAP, irin wannan rashin kulawa da ɗabi'a mai ƙarfi ba tare da wata shakka ba zai iya zama illa ga abokin ciniki da waɗanda ke kusa da shi ko ita.

Da ke ƙasa akwai hoton martani na Prause na ainihi da aka sanya a cikin martani ga wannan tambayar ta Quora (Prause tun daga yanzu ta share amsar ta). Shawarar Prause don ziyartar karuwa tana cikin sakin layi na karshe:

Duk da cewa wannan ba ɓatanci ko cin zarafi ba ne, yana da mahimmanci domin yana nuna rashin kulawa ga ɗabi'un ƙwararru, ƙa'idodin ɗabi'a da zamantakewa, da kuma bin doka. Wannan jigon ya mamaye duk abin da aka bayyana game da Nicole Prause a wannan shafin. Prause ta yi wa kanta ƙarya a cikin takardun kotu, tana da'awar ƙarya cewa ba ta taɓa buga amsar da ke sama ba.

Gudana - The Jagorar Magana Ta Musamman ana zargin sun ba da batutuwa don nazarin Nicole Prause da ta yi iƙirarin za su “lalata” jarabar batsa

Shin goyon bayan da Prause ke bayarwa ga masana'antar batsa ya samo asali ne daga wani abu da ake kira quid pro quo, ko fiye da ɗaya? Tabbas, musayar tagomashi ta faru a bainar jama'a a cikin 2015 lokacin da Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana (masu fafutukar masana'antar batsa) ta ba da taimakon Prause kuma ta karɓa. Nan da nan ta kai hari ga Prop 60 (kwaroron roba a cikin batsa, wanda masana'antar ba ta so).

Wani abu na biyu da zai iya faruwa a shekarar 2016 shi ne batun quid pro quo. An bai wa Prause kuɗi mai yawa don ya yi bincike kan shirin "Orgasmic Meditation" mai cike da gurɓataccen abu da kasuwanci (wanda a bayyane yake FBI ke bincikensa a yanzu ). Orgasmic Meditation, wata ƙungiyar ƙarya da ke karɓar kuɗi mai yawa don koya wa maza yadda ake shafa gyambon ciki na abokin tarayya. An nuna hoton Prause a nan yana lura da ma'aurata suna shiga OM:

Ba mu da tabbas, amma binciken da aka yi kan clitoris diddling (OM) na iya fuskantar matsala mai yiwuwa: ƙalubalen nemo mata waɗanda ke son a shafa musu al'aura yayin da ake haɗa su da na'urori kuma masu bincike ke sa ido a kansu. Don cimma burinta na ma'aurata 250 na OM, da alama Prause ta sami masu yin batsa a matsayin waɗanda ake zargi ta hanyar ƙungiyar sha'awar masana'antar batsa, Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana . Rahmar da aka samu ga FSC? Sannan, kusan shekaru biyu bayan haka, Prause ta fara bayyana a bainar jama'a cewa bincikenta na OM mai zuwa (wanda a da ba shi da alaƙa da batsa) zai kawar da jarabar batsa. Har zuwa wannan rubutun (Yuni, 2020) binciken OM bai bayyana ba tukuna.

Labarai suna zanen dandano OneTaste ba kawai a matsayin lalata ba, amma kamar yin amfani da ƙasa da ayyukan kasuwanci:

Cikakkun bayanai da takardu:

Babban mai wasan kwaikwayo Ruby the Big Rubousky , mataimakin shugaban ƙungiyar 'Yan Wasan Kwaikwayo na Adult Performers , ya bayyana cewa Prause ta sami masu wasan kwaikwayo na batsa a matsayin waɗanda ake nazari a kansu ta hanyar ƙungiyar/zauren sha'awar masana'antar batsa mafi shahara, wato Free Speech Coalition . (Tun daga lokacin Prause ya goge wannan zaren Twitter).

Da farko an ce OneTaste ne ya ɗauki nauyin wannan binciken (ko nazarin) da ake magana a kai , wani kamfani mai zaman kansa wanda ya karɓi $4,300.00 don wani bita na kwana 3 don koyon yadda ake sarrafa ƙwai. Kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin wannan binciken Bloomberg.com , OneTaste ya bayar da fakiti daban-daban da dama:

A halin yanzu, ɗalibai suna biya $ 499 don kammala aikin karshen mako, $ 4,000 don komawa baya, $ 12,000 don shirin koyawa, da kuma $ 16,000 don "m." A 2014, OneTaste ya fara sayar da mamba na $ 60,000 a shekara, wanda zai sa masu sayarwa su dauki duk darussan da suke so kuma suna zaune a gaban jere.

Bayanin hukuma game da binciken OM da mai ba da kuɗi, daga shafi na 3 na CV mai shafi 20 na Nicole Prause (lura cewa Prause ta lissafa kanta a matsayin "babban mai bincike"):

A cikin takardun kotu, tweets, da wasiƙar da aka cika da ƙarya tana tsoratar da ni, Yanzu haka Prause tana nuna ban tsoro cewa na ɓata mata suna ta hanyar bayyana cewa herungiyar OneTaste Foundation ce ta ba da kuɗin karatun ta na farko na Orgasmic Meditation. Wataƙila a halin yanzu ana karɓar kuɗaɗen ta sabon “ungiyar "Institute of OM Foundation" OM FREE ", ko kuma wani ɗayan yawancin rukunin OM, amma CV ɗinta baya yin ƙarya - duk da cewa Prause tana yi. Kuma muna da Co-mai binciken Greg Siegle's CV wanda yake jera OneTaste azaman kuɗaɗen bincike & Siegle's Orgasmic Meditation research:

Sai kuma wannan - wani labarin da aka buga a shekarar 2018 ya nuna cewa "OneTaste" ya yi kama da ya ƙirƙiri kamfanonin harsashi da yawa: Ƙungiyar asiri ta fi NXIVM muni? - roƙon uwa na ceto 'yarta daga 'OneTaste! '. Wani ɓangare mai dacewa:

Akwai bangaren kudi mai karfi. A cewar wata majiya, akwai kamfanonin harsashi da yawa. Waɗannan na iya zama kamar:

Ɗaya daga cikin Ku ɗanɗani
Kamfanin OneTaste
Hanyar OneTaste, LLC
OneTaste Cooperative, Inc.
OneTaste Media, LLC
Ehrlich Photography & Shutterbug Studio
Shagon Shutterbug
Ehrlich Hoto
Kamfanin Del Monte, Inc.
Caravan, Inc.
Vanungiyar Caravan
Vanungiyar Caravan Retreat Incorporated
Mirror Clan, Inc.
Cibiyar Insight, LLC
DBDD, LLC

Me yasa OM za ta ƙirƙiri kamfanonin harsashi? Ko ta yaya, wani labarin Yoga Journal na 2017 ya kuma ambaci OneTaste a matsayin mai ba da kuɗi ga binciken OM:

Articlesarin labaran da ke kwatanta Yin amfani a matsayin babban mai binciken binciken OneTaste (Orgasmic Meditation):

Karin bayani game da nazarin Prause & Siegle, wanda yanzu aka tallata a sabon gidan yanar gizon Cibiyar OM Foundation (ba tare da wata kalma a shafin ba game da "OneTaste" da aka ƙi"):

A cikin labarin Bloomberg na 2018 Babban Jami'in Gudanarwa Joanna Van Vleck ya ce OneTaste yanzu ya dogara ne akan nazarin EEG na Prause game da OM:

Sabon shugaban kamfanin yana yin fare cewa binciken da OneTaste ya bayar kan fa'idodin lafiya na OM, wanda ya ɗauki karatun ayyukan kwakwalwa daga nau'ikan bugun jini 130 da bugun jini, zai jawo hankalin sabbin mutane. A ƙarƙashin jagorancin masu bincike daga Jami'ar Pittsburgh, ana sa ran binciken zai fito da takardu na farko daga cikin takardu da yawa daga baya a wannan shekarar. " Kimiyyar da ke fitowa don tabbatar da menene wannan da kuma fa'idodin za ta yi girma sosai dangane da haɓaka ," in ji Van Vleck.

A taƙaice, an ɗauki Prause aiki ne don ƙarfafa muradun kasuwanci na kamfanin da ya lalace sosai kuma mai cike da ce-ce-ku-ce (wani labarin kuma: T the 'yatsa' ruɗi: Kwarewar mai karatu game da OneTaste - ba ta da daɗi kwata-kwata ).

Kuma, don gudanar da binciken OM, Prause ya buƙaci mahalarta da ke son su ji daɗin haɗuwa da na'urori, da kuma fallasa al'aurarsu da kuma yin al'aura da wani mutum yayin da masu bincike ke lura da amsoshinsu. Ba abu ne mai wahala a yi tunanin yana da wahala a sami mata masu son yin jima'i a ofishin Prause ba. Ko menene dalilan, Ruby ta dage cewa Prause ta sami batutuwa don nazarin OM ta hanyar FSC, kuma cewa Prause tana da dangantaka mai ci gaba da FSC:

Idan abin da ke sama gaskiya ne, yana bayyana alaƙar aiki mai daɗi tsakanin Prause da FSC. Alaƙa da wataƙila ta fara a cikin 2015, lokacin da aka ba wa Prause taimako a bainar jama'a (kuma a bayyane yake an yarda da ita) daga FSC mai aljihu . Nan da nan aka biyo baya da Prause tana jefa nauyin kimiyya a bayan wasu manyan manufofin FSC ( Shawara ta 60 , 'taurarin batsa ba kayan da aka lalata ba ne', 'jarabar batsa tatsuniya ce', 'batsa ba rikicin lafiyar jama'a ba ne', 'kallon batsa galibi yana da amfani', da sauransu)

A mãkirci thickens. Tun asali, an ba da kuɗin binciken don ganowa kawai amfanin “Karatun Orgasmic”- amma sai abin mamaki ya rikide ya zama nazari don magance lalata batsa (wanda tabbas zai biya bukatun FSC)!

Kodayake har yanzu binciken bai fito ba daga watan Yuni, 2020, a cikin 2017 Prause ya fara rawar jiki cewa har yanzu ba a buga ta ba Nazarin Nazarin Zuciya na "lalata" batsa da jarabar jima'i. Duk da haka binciken bai bayyana ba tare da yin amfani da batsa ba kuma mai yiwuwa bai ƙunshi kowane ainihin batsa ba.

A cikin sakonninta da sharhinta, Prause ta bayyana cewa ta nuna wa ma'auratanta masu shafa clitoris "fina-finan jima'i" kuma sakamakon (a ra'ayinta) ya karyata tsarin jarabar batsa. A takaice, binciken OM na Prause ya canza daga binciken "jima'i tare" zuwa wani takarda na masana'antar batsa mai goyon bayan batsa . Ga wasu misalai na Prause da ke ikirarin cewa bincikenta na "jima'i tare" (OM) mai zuwa ya karyata jarabar batsa.

Bayani: A lokacin bazara na 2019, Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya ta fitar da sabon bugu na littafin bincikenta, ICD-11, tare da ganewar asali mai suna " Matsalar Halayyar Jima'i Mai Wuya ." Kafin a fitar da "sigar aiwatarwa," an sanya daftarin beta na ICD-11 a yanar gizo, kuma an samar da shi ga masu sha'awar su yi tsokaci a kai. (Ana buƙatar yin rajista mai sauƙi don kallo da shiga.)

Abin mamaki, Prause ta buga ƙarin tsokaci a cikin sashin sharhi na beta-draft fiye da duk wani mai sharhi da aka haɗa. A cikin sashin sharhi a ƙarƙashin wannan sabon shawara , Prause ta buga sau uku game da bincikenta na OM (jima'i tare, N=250). Ga tsokacinta da ke tabbatar da cewa bincikenta na OM bai sami wata shaida ta tilasta yin jima'i ba (ba ta taɓa yin hakan ba, koda lokacin da masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi suka ce tana da ):

Wani sharhi na ICD-11:

Wani sharhi na ICD-11:

Ta sake yin ƙoƙari, a cikin 2018:

Yunkurinta ya gaza, kuma sabuwar ICD-11 ta ƙunshi sabon ganewar asali wanda ya dace da waɗanda ke fama da jarabar batsa: "Matsalar Halayyar Jima'i Mai Wuya ."

Amma ta yi ƙoƙari mafi wuya don kawar da cutar ta ICD-11 ta CSBD. A watan Yuli, 2018, Yi wasa bari WHO, APA, da AASECT su san cewa nazarin karatun ta na Orgasmic Medened ya "gurbata" samfurin batsa / jima'i:

Wane mai bincike ne mai gaskiya zai taɓa da'awar cewa ya karyata dukkan wani fanni na bincike kuma ya "ƙaryata" duk wani bincike da aka yi a baya tare da wani bincike guda ɗaya wanda bai ɗauki masu shan batsa ba kuma ba a tsara shi don tantance alamun, alamu da halayen jaraba ba? Prause ta yi iƙirarin "ƙarya" iri ɗaya a cikin 2015 bisa ga aikinta mai ban mamaki, kuma a ƙarshe an gaishe ta da nazarin 10 da takwarorinta suka yi nazari a kai tana cewa ta yi kuskuren fahimtar sakamakon bincikenta.

A cikin wannan tweet Prause ta ce karatunta na OM mai zuwa zai gyara duk "karya" ta masu ilimin ilimin jima'i:

A cikin wannan labarin SLATE na 2018, " Me Ya Sa Har Yanzu Muke Damuwa Game da Kallon Batsa ?" na Marty Klein, Taylor Kohut, da Nicole Prause , an ma gaya mana cewa Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya ta jira nazarin OM na Prause:

Mafi mahimmanci, ba mu da nazarin ilimin kimiyya game da ainihin halin jima'i a cikin wadanda ke bayar da rahoton wannan matsala. Nazarin farko game da halayen jima'i a cikin dakin gwaje-gwaje, wanda ke gwada samfurin compulsivity, a halin yanzu an duba bita a jaridar kimiyya. (Bayyanawa: Daya daga cikin marubucin marubucin wannan labarin, Nicole Prause, shine marubucin marubucin wannan nazarin.) Kungiyar Lafiya ta Duniya ta jira don ganin duk wata kimiyya ta goyi bayan bayanan su na yau da kullum kafin su shawo kan miliyoyin mutanen lafiya.

Akwai wasu karin misalai na Prause da ke gaya wa duniya cewa karatun da ke ta "jima'i na baƙi" zai lalata batsa da jarabar jima'i… na tsawon lokaci.

Bayan duk ta yi ihu cewa bincikenta na Orgasmic Meditation mai zuwa zai karyata jarabar batsa, Prause ta riga ta yi rijistar binciken OM a ranar Maris 27, 2018 a matsayin yanzu ana tantance "samfuran jaraba na kallon fina-finan jima'i." Mafi yawan rashin daidaituwa.

Sabanin abin da Prause ta yi a nan, yin rijista kafin lokaci yana nufin cewa kafin tattara ainihin bayanai , kuna raba sashen gabatarwa da hanyoyin takardar ku tare da wasu. Prause tana yin rijistar bincikenta na OM shekaru 2 bayan tattara bayanai, kuma shekara guda bayan ta yi alfahari da cewa "binciken da ta yi ya karyata jarabar batsa." Mujallar da daga ƙarshe ta buga binciken OM na Prause tana buƙatar yin nazari sosai kan ɗabi'un da ba su da ƙwarewa da ke kewaye da wannan takarda. Haka nan ƙungiyoyin ɗabi'a ma.

Abin da Prause ba ta gaya wa kowa ba shi ne cewa ta yi amfani da masu yin batsa da ƙungiyar masu fafutukar kare haƙƙin mata ta masana'antar batsa, FSC ta bayar. FSC ɗin da ta ba ta taimako shekaru 3 da suka gabata lokacin da aka dakatar da asusun Twitter ɗinta na dindindin saboda cin zarafi . (Wanda aka zalunta sakamakon cin zarafin da Prause ta yi a Twitter? Jagoran marubucin ɗaya daga cikin sake dubawa da aka fi ambata game da wallafe-wallafen kan tsarin jarabar batsa: Neuroscience of Internet Pornography Addiction: A Review and Update (2015) .)

A taƙaice: An bayar da Prause, kuma da alama ta karɓi taimako daga FSC. Nan da nan, Prause ta yi amfani da kafofin sada zumunta (da imel) don haɓaka sha'awar masana'antar batsa, yayin da take kai hari kan binciken da ya nuna rashin kyau ga batsa. Tun daga lokacin, ta yi yaƙi mai zurfi a kan mutane da ƙungiyoyi da take kira "masu fafutukar yaƙi da batsa."

Tambaya : Shin Jami'ar Pittsburgh ta san yadda Prause ta mayar da bincikenta zuwa kayan aikin farfaganda ga masana'antar batsa? Binciken OM ya sami amincewar IRB ta hannun Pittsburgh da kuma mai bincike Dr. Greg J. Siegle . Shin Jami'ar ta san cewa ana zargin Prause da samun batutuwa ta hanyar Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana ? Shin Jami'ar Pittsburgh ta san game da kusancin da Prause ke da shi da masana'antar batsa? Shin Jami'ar Pittsburgh ta san da dogon tarihin Prause na rashin ɗa'a, kuma wani lokacin ba bisa ƙa'ida ba, (rahotanni na 'yan sanda na ƙarya, ɓata suna, rahotannin ƙarya ga hukumomin gudanarwa) don tallafawa ajandar masana'antar batsa?

Sauran - Disamba, 2016: Yin amfani da rahotanni Yaƙi da Sabon Magunguna (FTND) zuwa Jihar Utah

Nicole Prause kamar tana yin karin bayani game da Yakin Sabon Magungunan (FTND) fiye da yadda take yi game da ita ko binciken wasu. Dubawa mai sauri ya nuna cewa Yi amfani da tweeted sau 35 game da FTND a watan Nuwamba & Disamba 2016.

A ranar 19 ga Disamba, 2016, Prause ta rubuta imel zuwa ga Sashen Kula da Yara da Iyali na Jihar Utah (DCFS), inda ta zargi Fight the New Drug a cikin shirinta na Fortify ta yanar gizo (wani manhaja na ilimi ta yanar gizo ga matasa da manya waɗanda ke neman shawo kan amfani da batsa ta hanyar tilastawa) na "neman labaran jima'i daga yara" ba tare da izinin iyaye ba da kuma "tilasta" yara su bayar da waɗannan labaran. Yayin da take jaddada cewa ita "ƙwararriyar masaniyar ilimin halayyar ɗan adam ce a California (CA #27778)" kuma "mai ba da rahoto da aka ba da umarni," ambaton da ta bayar don tallafawa ikirarinta na farko ya fito ne daga wani gidan yanar gizo mai suna "Harlot Magazine."

Nicole CC ta naɗa Clay Olsen, Shugabar Fight the New Drug (FTND), kan ƙarar da ta shigar wa DCFS. Kiran wayar da FTND ta yi daga baya zuwa DCFS ya nuna cewa (duk da cewa ba za su iya tabbatarwa ko musantawa ko an gudanar da bincike a hukumance ba) (1) zargin da Prause ta yi ya cika duk wani sharaɗi na wani abu da DCFS ke bincika, kuma (2) ba lallai ba ne FTND ta haɗu da DCFS tunda babu "abin da za a bincika" da "babu abin da za a bayyana."

Duk da wannan duka, Prause ta ci gaba da wallafa damuwarta a bainar jama'a game da " @FightTheNewDrug yara da abin ya shafa" a shafinta na Twitter kuma ta aika da wannan buƙatar ga duk mabiyanta na Twitter, "idan ɗanku ya kammala shirin @FightTheNewDrug Fortify, yana tambayar jima'i hx, Utah DCFS tana son yin magana da ku. Wannan yadda ake jin sa."

Yawancin karin tweets masu alaƙa, waɗanda ke ƙunshe da ba daidai ba & drivel mai kumburi, wanda jihar Utah ta ƙudurta zama magana ta fanko:

Gunaguni ya tafi har zuwa samar da gajeren bidiyon YouTube don tayar da FTND da masu bincike:

-------

-------

Yin amfani da hanzari ya ƙaddamar da maganganu, yana zargin FTND na tursasawa da kuma kyakkyawan na pedophilia!

-------

-------

-------

-------

--------

--------

--------

A cikin wadannan tweets Ku yi amfani da ragamar @delmonater tare da labaran da ba shi da tushe (wanda jihar Utah ta yi watsi da hankali)

--------

Ga bayanin da Prause ta rubuta a ƙasa, tana kiran duk wanda ta yi wa wulaƙanci a matsayin mai nuna wariya ga mata, yayin da ba ta bayar da wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan ƙaryarta ba. A cikin 'yan shekarun nan, Dr. Prause ta yi ƙoƙari sosai don ta sanya kanta a matsayin "mace da ake azabtar da ita idan ta faɗi gaskiya ga iko." Sau da yawa tana aika wannan bayanin da take rabawa a laccocinta na jama'a, tana nuna cewa ana cin zarafinta "a matsayinta na mace masanin kimiyya," kuma tana zana kanta a matsayin mai bin diddigin abubuwan da ke ci gaba da tabbatar da rashin lahani na batsa duk da hare-haren nuna wariya. Har ma an san ta da yin amfani da tweets na haɗakar da'awar nuna wariya ga mata da iƙirarin cewa (hakikanin kimiyya, wanda aka yi nazari a kai) wanda ba ta yarda da shi ba "ƙarya ne."

Duk wata shawara da ke nuna cewa FTND, Don Hilton, Wilson, Gabe Deem ko Alexander Rhodes suna da sha'awar nuna wariya, an ƙirƙira ta ne, domin ƙin amincewarsu ba shi da alaƙa da Dr. Prause a matsayinta na mutum ko mace , kuma kawai yana da alaƙa da maganganunta na ƙarya da kuma ikirarin da ba su da tushe game da bincikenta.

-------

-------

Hukumar bita ta amince da "kimiyya" ta hanyar amfani da kalmar "kimiyya", amma a kai a kai tana yin kuskuren bayyana ainihin bincikenta a cikin manema labarai . Dangane da karatunta, da alama Prause ta sami masu yin batsa a matsayin waɗanda aka yi wa tambayoyi ta hanyar wata ƙungiyar masu sha'awar masana'antar batsa, Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana . An yi zargin cewa an yi amfani da waɗanda FSC ta samu a cikin bincikenta na bindiga kan shirin "Orgasmic Meditation" mai cike da gurɓatawa da kasuwanci (wanda FBI ke bincikensa yanzu ). Duba wannan musayar Twitter tsakanin Prause da babban mai yin wasan kwaikwayo, Ruby the Big Rubousky , wanda shine mataimakin shugaban ƙungiyar 'Yan wasan kwaikwayo na manya (Prause ya goge wannan zaren).

Wannan sakon Twitter na gaba ya ƙunshi "zanen bayanai" na biyu da Prause ta saba wallafawa a shafinta na Twitter. Ya lissafa FTND, SASH, IITAP, YBOP, NoFap.com, RebootNation, PornAddiction.com, da sauransu a matsayin gidajen yanar gizo na "labaran karya" yayin da ya lissafa gidajen yanar gizo guda biyu kacal a matsayin waɗanda ke da cikakkun bayanai game da tasirin batsa: 1) Gidan yanar gizon Justin Lemillers (marubuci mai biyan kuɗi ga Playboy); 2) AASECT, wanda ba ƙungiya ce mai ban mamaki ba ( ƙaryata sanarwar AASECT cewa babu jarabar batsa/jima'i ).

-------

Tweets ɗin da suka gabata ƙaramin misali ne na tweets ɗin Prause da kuma sharhin Facebook da ke ɓata sunan FTND da kuma ɓata sunan FTND. Iƙirarin Prause cewa ita ce wacce aka zalunta, duk da haka ita ce mai laifin. Ana iya samun ƙarin tweets da yawa a cikin wannan sashe: Wasu - Oktoba, 2018: Prause ya yi iƙirarin cewa Fight The New Drug ya gaya wa "mabiyansa" cewa ya kamata a yi wa Dr. Prause fyaɗe.

Don haka Prause ta ci gaba da amfani da hukumomin kula da harkokin kuɗi ba daidai ba don korafe-korafe marasa tushe - wani ɓangare a matsayin hanyar tsoratar da mutane da ƙungiyoyi, wani ɓangare kuma a matsayin hanyar da za ta yi amfani da zarge-zargenta na ƙarya da ɓata suna a cikin manyan damar kafofin watsa labarai.

Wasu - Janairu, 2017: Nicole Prause tweets cewa Nuhu B. Church ne mai kimiyya ba daidai ba gwani da kuma addini profiteer

Har yanzu, Prause ta ƙaddamar da wani hari na twitter wanda ba a taɓa tsammani ba, wanda aka kai wa wani mutum da ya warke daga ED da batsa ya jawo. Wannan tweet ɗin Prause mai zuwa yana da alaƙa da bayyanar Nuhu a sashin DearSugarRadio " Abokin Saurayina Ya Shagaltu da Batsa ".

Shin Nuhu kimiyya ba daidai ba ce? Nope. Kamar yadda yake sabawa, Kuskuren ya kasa bayyana abubuwan da ba'a dace ba.

Shin Nuhu ne masani? Haka ne, kamar yadda Nuhu ya:

an dawo dasu daga buri na batsa da kuma ladabi na ED
rubuta wani littafi game da jaraba na batsa da kuma matsalolin jima'i da aka haifar da yarinya
ya bayyana a radiyo TV tattauna batun PIED da buri
wani shafin yanar gizon bada wadataccen albarkatun ga wadanda ke dawowa daga matsalar jima'i da kuma jaraba na batsa
samar yawan bidiyo a kan batutuwa daban-daban kewaye batsa buri da kuma dawowa daga batsa buri
gabatar a daban-daban taro
sun ba da horo da shawara ga mutum ɗaya da shawara ga waɗanda ke dawowa daga buri da kuma batsa na ED

Shin addinin Nuhu ne? Nope. Ya kasance wanda bai yarda da Allah ba, wanda ya bayyana sau da yawa a baya.

Nuhu mai riba ne? Littafinsa, bidiyonsa da gidan yanar gizon sa duk ana basu kyauta. Nuhu kawai yana cajin horaswa ne akan mutum daya saboda yana cin lokaci.

Muna ɗauka cewa Dr. Prause ba ta bi da abokan ciniki kyauta (idan ta ga abokan ciniki). Mun san cewa An ba da kyauta (don kuɗi) ta "gwani" shaida game da jarabar jima'i da jarabar batsa. Hakanan tana karɓar kuɗi don yin magana a inda take lalata batsa da jarabar jima'i.

A ƙarshe, la'akari da gaskiyar cewa yana da wani ɓangare na APA (American Psychological Association) ka'idodin masana kimiyya don kaiwa wadanda ke ƙoƙarin dawowa.

Sauran - Janairu, 2017: Yi amfani da farfesa farfesa Frederick M. Toates tare da da'awar ƙarya

Kafin wallafa littafin " The Routledge International Handbook of Sexual Addiction " An yi amfani da tweets cewa "babin ilimin jijiyoyi kawai na littafin mutum ne wanda ba shi da horo kan ilimin jijiyoyi" ya rubuta:

Babin da ake magana a kai shine 3.2 - "Jin Daɗin Jima'i" kuma Frederick M. Toates DPhil DSc ne ya rubuta shi.

Yar'adar 73 mai shekarun haihuwa XNUMX ita ce Professor Professor of Biological Psychology a Jami'ar Open da kuma Mataimakin Shugaban Kasa na Jami'ar Psychology Society. Ba wai kawai a horar da shi ba ne, shi farfesa ne na ilmin halitta (neuroscience).

Tare da digirin digirgir guda biyu, Frederick Toates ya zama jagora a nazarin tsarin ƙarfafa gwiwa (tsarin lada), musamman dangane da sha'awar jima'i da kwarin gwiwa. Sabon littafinsa: Yadda Sha'awar Jima'i Ke Aiki: Bukatar Sirri . Farfesa Toates yana buga binciken halittu da kuma rubuta littattafan ilimin halittar jiki kafin Nikky Prause ta zama abin haskakawa a idanun iyayenta. Duk da cewa Farfesa Toates har yanzu tana wallafawa da aiki a fannin ilimi, ba a haɗa Prause da jami'a ba tsawon shekaru 2.

Frederick M. Toates BincikenGate shafi tare da game da littattafan 100
Frederick M. Toates Amazon list list. Game da litattafan 20
Shafin Jami'ar Frederick M. Toates (wanda ba'a sabunta shi tun daga 2005)

Tare da burin da ake yi na Farisawa, ya nuna cewa babu wani ƙarya da za a iya ba da labarin ko kuma ba zai yiwu ba. Barka da zuwa ga kulob din, Farfesa Toates.

Shekaru biyu bayan haka lokacin da Fred Toates ya nuna munafuncin David Ley kuma Ley ya rasa shi, yana kiran Gary Wilson sunaye da maganganu game da abin da ba zai yiwu ba:

Dauda Ley yana karanta labaran (ko wani dabam) akan neuroscience ko dopamine? Hilarious.

Sabuntawa : Masana'antar batsa ta David J. Ley yanzu tana karɓar kuɗi daga masana'antar batsa don tallata gidajen yanar gizon su, yayin da yake musanta illolin batsa da ƙarfi. Duba - Yanzu haka kamfanin Xhamster na masana'antar batsa ya biya David J. Ley diyya don tallata gidajen yanar gizon sa da kuma shawo kan masu amfani da shi cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i tatsuniya ce.

**Abinda ke gudana: Yin amfani da kafofin watsa labarun don musgunawa & ɓata sunan MDPI mai wallafa, masu binciken da ke bugawa a cikin MDPI, da duk wanda ke faɗi Park et al., 2016**

MDPI ita ce kamfanin iyaye na Switzerland na mujallu da dama na ilimi, ciki har da Kimiyyar Halayyar Dan Adam . Prause ta damu da MDPI saboda (1) Kimiyyar Halayyar Dan Adam ta buga labarai biyu da Prause ba ta yarda da su ba (saboda sun tattauna takardu da ta yi, a tsakanin ɗaruruwan takardu da wasu marubuta suka yi) , kuma, (2) Gary Wilson marubucin Park et al. , 2016 ne. Takardar biyu:

Abubuwan da ke cikin yanar-gizon Intanit Hotuna: A Review da Update (Love et al., 2015)
Shin Intanit Intanit yana haifar da Dysfunctions? A Review tare da Clinical Reports (Park et al., 2016)

Takarda ta biyu ( Park et al .) ba ta yi nazarin binciken Prause ba. Ta ambaci sakamakon binciken a cikin takardu 3 nata. Bisa buƙatar mai bita a lokacin aikin bita na takwarorinta, ta yi magana game da takarda ta uku, takarda ta 2015 ta Prause & Pfaus , ta hanyar ambaton wani rubutu na ilimi a cikin wata mujalla da ta soki jaridar sosai. (Babu isasshen sarari a Park et al . don magance duk kurakuran da ikirari marasa tallafi da aka samu a cikin Prause & Pfaus .)

Kwanaki kaɗan bayan wallafawar Park et al. Prause ta dage cewa MDPI ta janye ta. Amsar ƙwararru ga labaran ilimi da mutum bai amince da su ba ita ce a buga wani sharhi da ke bayyana duk wani ƙin amincewa. Kamfanin iyaye na Behavioral Sciences , MDPI, ya gayyaci Prause da ta yi haka. Prause ta ƙi tayin kuma ta nemi janyewa (ba tare da wani dalili ba). Tun bayan wallafawar Park et al., Prause tana ƙoƙarin duk wani makami da ke cikin makamanta don a janye takardar (gami da aika koke-koke na bogi ga hukumomin lafiya na duk likitoci 7 da suka rubuta takardar tare). Imel ɗinta ga jami'an MDPI, cike da ikirari na ƙarya da kuma zarge-zargen da ake musantawa cikin sauƙi, sun kasa cimma burinta. Babu wanda ya taɓa ganin irin wannan mummunan halin da wani mai bincike ya yi.

Ba tare da ƙwarewa ba, ta koma ga barazana da kafofin sada zumunta (kuma kwanan nan shafin Retraction Watch ) don tursasa MDPI ta janye Park da sauransu . Bugu da ƙari, ta sanar da MDPI cewa ta shigar da ƙara ga Ƙungiyar Masana Ilimin Halayyar Dan Adam ta Amurka da kuma hukumomin kiwon lafiya na likitoci. Ta kuma matsa wa cibiyar kula da lafiya ta likitoci da Hukumar Bitar Cibiyoyin Kula da Lafiya, wanda ya haifar da dogon bincike mai zurfi, wanda bai sami wata shaida ta aikata ba daga marubutan jaridar.

Bayan ya kasa kawo koma-baya mara cancanta, Dr. Prause ya ci gaba da yin maganganu marasa gaskiya game da mujallar kanta, yana mai iƙirarin cewa Kimiyyar Halayyar Jarida jarida ce ta cin zarafi (ba haka ba ne - an yi amfani da PubMed a cikin jerin ), kuma Park et al. ba a taɓa yin bita ba (yawanci mujalla tana aika takarda ga masu bita 2 don yin tsokaci da suka). A zahiri, an sake duba takardar aƙalla sau 6 da muka sani (don Kimiyyar Behvavioral kaɗai), gami da bita ɗaya mai adawa da Dr. Prause - wacce daga baya ta bayyana kanta a kaikaice a matsayin mutumin da ya sake duba ba kawai ƙaddamar da Kimiyyar Halayyar Ba , har ma da sigar da ta gabata, mafi gajeriyar sigar takardar, wacce aka gabatar wa Jaridar Yale of Biology and Medicine ( YJBM ).

A cikin imel da yawa da ta aika wa MDPI (da sauransu), Prause ta ambaci "suka 77" kuma ta yi iƙirarin cewa ba a magance su ba. A zahiri, da yawa daga cikin abubuwan da ake kira matsaloli 77 an kwafi su ba tare da kulawa ba kuma an liƙa su daga bitar Prause game da gabatarwar YJBM ; 25 daga cikinsu ba su da alaƙa da gabatarwar Kimiyyar Halayya . A wata ma'anar, mai bita ɗaya tilo da ya la'anci takardar ya yanke kuma ya liƙa da dama daga sharhin da aka yi a wani mujalla ( YJBM ), wanda ba shi da wani tasiri ga takardar da aka gabatar wa Kimiyyar Halayya. Wannan ba shi da ƙwarewa sosai.

Ko da ban da wannan rashin daidaituwar da ke bayyana, kaɗan daga cikin matsalolin 77 da aka iya ɗauka a matsayin halal ne. Duk da haka, mun yi nazari sosai kan kowace tsokaci don samun fahimta mai amfani, kuma mun rubuta cikakken amsa ga duk tsokaci ga Kimiyyar Halayyar Ɗabi'a da editocinta. Kusan dukkan sauran tsokaci 50 masu suka ko dai ba su da tushe a kimiyyance, ba su da tushe, ko kuma kawai maganganun ƙarya ne. Wasu sun kasance masu maimaitawa. Marubutan sun ba wa MDPI amsa maki-da-maki ga kowace matsala da ake kira matsala.

A cikin takaici da sha'awarta, Prause ta koma Twitter ( da Wikipedia ) don ta yi yaƙi da ita, tana kwance a cikin wannan tweet :

Prause yana da'awar cewa mai wallafa MDPI yana cikin jerin mujallun masu lalata da mai laburare Jeffrey Beall ya tsara. Wannan ikirarin ƙarya ne, kuma babu wani jerin da ke da alaƙa da hanyar haɗin da Prause ta wallafa a shafin Twitter. MDPI ba ta buga mujallun masu lalata da yara. A gaskiya ma, an bincika ta shekaru da suka gabata bayan an sanya ta cikin jerin masu lalata da yara, kuma an yanke shawarar cewa ita ce halaltacciyar mai wallafawa. Duba: http://www.mdpi.com/about/announcements/534 . Mutumin (Jeffrey Beall) wanda ya yi kuskuren daga ƙarshe ya goge dukkan aikinsa

MDPI tana amsawa:

Yi amfani da ragowar Twitter ya ci gaba (wasu daga cikin tweets da ke ƙasa):

MDPI tana mayar da martani ga Yin amfani da:

Shugaba na MDPI Franck Vazquez, Ph.D, kuma ya amsa, kamar yadda yake yi:

Tsayar da ci gaba (MDPI ƙarshe watsi da rubutun Twitter):

Shin Prause tana ƙoƙarin fitar da MDPI daga PubMed da sauran fihirisa bisa ga ƙaryarta? Tweets uku daga watan Agusta, 2016 - 'yan makonni kaɗan bayan an buga Park et al., 2016:

Na biyu tweet:

Na uku tweet:

Wani tweet daga Nuwamba, 2017 yana nuna cewa Prause har yanzu yana cin zarafin hukumomin da ke kula da harkokin kuɗi game da MDPI ( https://twitter.com/NicoleRPrause/status/935983476775387136 ):

Daga wani rubutu da ya ƙunshi maganganun ƙarya da dama daga Prause: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/mormontherapist/2016/12/op-ed.html . Ɗaya daga cikin labaran da aka ambata shine Park et al., bitar da likitoci 7 na sojojin ruwa suka rubuta tare da ni da kuma wasu ƙwararru suka rubuta tare. Ɗayan kuma wasu ƙwararru ne suka rubuta tare, ciki har da Todd Love PsyD - wanda Prause shi ma ya ci zarafinsa . (Kuma, an wanke MDPI a hukumance kuma an cire shi kafin Beall ya cire jerin sunayensa.)

Prause ya yi ƙoƙarin tsoma baki ga wasu batutuwan mujallu na MDPI ta hanyar ɓata sunan MDPI:

----

Ga wasu misalai na Gwadawa ba tare da ba da izinin shaming wasu don haɗin kai / wallafe-wallafen tare da karɓar kyauta daga MDPI:

-

----

---

A nan Prause ta buga katin da ta fi so - tana zargin wasu da lalata - ba tare da wata shaida ba ( kamar yadda ta yi da ni da wasu da yawa).

Ƙarin ƙusoshin ƙarya na misogyny:

An yi zargin cewa takardar da ta kai hari a fannin kimiyyar halayyar ɗan adam ta janye daga aikinta. Wannan duka ɓatanci ne kuma ba shi da ƙwarewa.

Taron Twitter ya ci gaba:

Bayan dogon bincike mai zurfi, mai ɗaukar lokaci, MDPI ta yanke shawarar kada ta janye takardar, ta kuma rarraba daftarin edita tana sukar halayen rashin ƙwarewa na Prause. Da zarar an sanar da Prause, ta fara musayar imel mara ƙwarewa, mara gaskiya da MDPI - tana kwafi masu rubutun ra'ayin kanka a yanar gizo David Ley (abokin aikinta na kud da kud) da Retraction Watch da sauransu. A ranar da aka yi wannan aika-aikar imel ɗin tana cin zarafi da barazana ga MDPI, Prause ta yi amfani da sunayen masu amfani da Wikipedia da yawa (wanda ya karya dokokin Wikipedia) don gyara Wikipedia , ta saka bayanan karya game da MDPI da kuma kai hari ga marubutan Park et al. , shugaban MDPI, da wasu mutane biyu a cikin ƙungiyar.

Duk da cewa barazanar imel na Prause ba ta kan kafofin sada zumunta ba (duk da haka), ta kwafi masu rubutun ra'ayin kanka a yanar gizo waɗanda aka sanya su don lalata suna na MDPI a kafofin watsa labarai, idan sun ga dama. Ley ta yi rubutu a shafin yanar gizo na Psychology Today kuma sau da yawa ta yi aiki a matsayin Bakin Fara'a . Neuro Skeptic yana da wani shahararren shafin yanar gizo wanda ke ɓatar da bincike na halal (kuma wani lokacin abin zargi). Adam Marcus ya rubuta wa Retraction Watch. Prause kuma ya kwafi Iratxe Puebla, wacce ke aiki da COPE, wata ƙungiya da ke magana kan ɗabi'un wallafe-wallafe.

Sabuntawa: A ranar 13 ga Yuni, Retraction Watch (RW) ta buga wani labari mara daidai kuma mai son zuciya game da abubuwan da suka faru game da takardar Behavioral Sciences Park et al. , 2016. Prause ta tuntuɓi ma'aikatan RW kuma ta ba su bayanan da take so a buga - kuma RW ta haɗiye su gaba ɗaya ta buga su yadda ya kamata. Amsata ta bayyana a ƙarƙashin labarin Retraction Watch . Duk da haka, RW ta gyara sharhina sosai kafin ta buga shi. Ina bayar da bayanai daban-daban da suka ɓace a wannan sashe: "Wa ke kallon Retraction Watch ?" - sabuntawa kan abubuwan da suka faru.

Daga cikin wasu karkatattun abubuwa, ɓangaren RW ya cire cikakkun bayanai game da kamfen ɗin Nicole Prause na shekaru 4 da bai yi nasara ba (kuma mara kyau) don a janye takardar ( an rubuta a sassa 8 a wannan shafin: Kokarin Prause na a janye takardar bita ta Behavioral Sciences ( Park et al ., 2016) . RetractionWatch ya ƙi yin hira da Gary Wilson, ya yi watsi da imel da dama da aka adana da gangan yana tabbatar da cewa Prause yana ƙarya, kuma ya zaɓi ɓangarorin imel da ba su dace ba daga mahallin don zana hoton abubuwan da suka faru. A kan ƙarin misalai na kamfen ɗin kafofin watsa labarun da Prause ke yi na kai hari ga Park et al., 2016:

"Maido da batsa" ya sanya jerin YBOP guda biyu, wanda ke haifar da Prause don tweet takarda ta Gary Wilson da likitocin Navy. Yi amfani da da'awar ƙarya cewa ta ɓoye COPE cikin shawarar ba da shawara. Yana da kullun.

Aika sakon Twitter ga jerin bincike guda biyu daga YBOP . Babu ɗaya daga cikin jerin da ya ƙunshi Park et al. , 2016.

Janairu 29, 2019 :

Duk ƙarya ta hanyar cyberstalker.

A ranar 16 ga Fabrairu, 2019, wani ƙwararre a fannin magungunan jima'i ya gabatar da jawabi a taron Majalisar Tarayyar Turai na 21 kan tasirin intanet kan jima'i. An yi wasu zame-zame da ke bayyana matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa, kamar yadda aka ambata a shafin Park et al., 2016. Takardun sun sa Nicole Prause, David Ley, Joshua Grubbs da abokansu suka fusata a shafin Twitter a Park et al ., 2016.

Josh Grubbs sau da yawa yana goyon bayan ƙawarta Prause a hare-haren yanar gizo da kuma ɓatar da kimiyya (ko nasa karatun) . Lura cewa a cikin duk sakonnin Twitter da maganganun Prause & Ley ba sa bayar da misali ɗaya na "zamba" ko "ƙarya" na jaridar. Tunda Prause tana ɗaya daga cikin masu bita shida na Park et al. , za ku yi tunanin za ta iya cire wani sashe ta bayyana yadda take "zamba". Ba ta taɓa faruwa ba… kuma ba za ta taɓa faruwa ba.

Sabuntawa: Joshua Grubbs ya tabbatar da nuna wariya mai tsauri da ke haifar da ajandar HSI lokacin da suka haɗu da ƙawayensu Nicole Prause da David Ley wajen ƙoƙarin dakatar da YourBrainOnPorn.com . Grubbs, da sauran "ƙwararrun" masu goyon bayan batsa a www.realyourbrainonporn.com suna aikata laifukan keta haƙƙin alamar kasuwanci da kuma tsugunewa ba bisa ƙa'ida ba.

A shafukan sada zumunta, Prause ta bayyana cewa ta soke maganata saboda na gabatar da "takardun bogi." Misali, Tweet's tweet Attack the ESSM talk, kuma ta da'awar cewa ba a gayyaci Gary Wilson ba ne saboda ya "ba da takardun shaida na ƙarya":

Shaidar cewa Prause yana ƙarya tana cikin wannan sashe: Tabbatar da cewa Prause ya yi wa waɗanda suka shirya taron Ƙungiyar Magungunan Jima'i ta Turai, wanda hakan ya sa ESSM ta soke jawabin Gary Wilson.

Ƙarin tweets da suka shafi tattaunawar ESSM ta 2019 da Park et al. , 2016:

A'a, COPE ba ya bayar da shawara ba, ko da yake Kodayake ya dame su saboda 3 tsawon shekaru. Da zarar COPE ya fahimci cewa an yarda da dokokin Dokar Navy, duk maganganun sasantawa ya ƙare.

Wani ƙarya game da "an kawar da jaraba." Littattafan bincike kamar DSM da ICD ba sa amfani da kalmar "jaraba" don bayyana duk wani jaraba: suna amfani da "rashin lafiya." A zahiri, sabuwar sigar littafin binciken lafiya na Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya, Rarraba Cututtuka ta Duniya (ICD-11), ta ƙunshi sabon ganewar asali wanda ya dace da gano abin da aka fi sani da 'jarabar batsa' ko 'jarabar jima'i.' Ana kiransa "Rashin Halayyar Jima'i Mai Wuya " (CSBD).

Sashe na farko na wannan babban sharhin ya fallasa ƙaryar Prause game da ICD-11: Bayyana " Me Yasa Har Yanzu Muke Damuwa Game da Kallon Batsa ?", na Marty Klein, Taylor Kohut, da Nicole Prause (2018) . Don cikakken bayani game da sabon ganewar cutar ICD-11, duba wannan labarin na baya-bayan nan na Ƙungiyar Ci Gaban Lafiyar Jima'i (SASH): Ƙungiyar Lafiya ta Duniya ta rarraba "Halayyar Jima'i Mai Tilasta" a matsayin Ciwon Lafiyar Hankali.

Ƙari mafi yawa na Magana na 2019 ESSM mai suna Park et al., 2016:

Prause da Ley – kamar koyaushe, suna kare batsa da masana'antar batsa da ƙarfi.

Ba tare da wani dalili ba, Prause ya sake wallafa wani rubutu a shafinsa na Twitter game da labarin RetractionWatch na bogi ( 3-1-19 ):

An ci gaba da yin tsokaci, yana ɓata sunan mujallar Behavioral Sciences :

Abin mamaki, Prause ta wallafa wani hari a shafin Twitter kan MDPI : Wannan ƙimar da aka rage ta Norwegian Register kuskure ne na malamai, wanda daga baya aka gyara. Duba bayanin shafin Wikipedia na MDPI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:MDPI#Reply_1-APR-2019

Prause ta san gaskiya domin da yawa daga cikin sunayen karya da ta yi amfani da su sun gyara shafin MDPI Wikipedia , suna saka labaran karya da ta saba yi.

Hanya zuwa ga sigar da aka gyara tana nuna cewa ba a rage darajar MDPI ba. Shi ya sa Prause ba ta haɗa zuwa shafin da ke cikin tweet ɗinta ba. Hoton da ke ƙasa:

Kwana biyu bayan haka Prause ya yi ta yaɗa wani tsohon zaren twitter inda Gary Wilson ke gyara Josh Grubbs. Ta wallafa hoton hoton da aka yi watsi da shi a shafinta na Twitter :

Wannan alama ce ta 4 shekaru masu rikice-rikicen cyber-hargitsi da lalacewa.

Afrilu, 2019, David Ley ya haɗu da Nikky wajen raina Park et al., 2016 :

Ley bai taɓa mayar da martani da wani abu da zai iya kare ƙaryarsa ba. Sabuntawa : Masana'antar batsa yanzu tana biyan David J. Ley don tallata gidajen yanar gizon su, yayin da yake musanta illolin batsa da ƙarfi. Duba - Yanzu haka kamfanin Xhamster na masana'antar batsa yana karɓar diyya daga David J. Ley don tallata gidajen yanar gizon sa da kuma shawo kan masu amfani da shi cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i tatsuniya ne.

Afrilu 27, 2019. Yin amfani da wani zaren da ba a saba gani ba don neman uzuri don yaɗa ƙaryar da aka saba yi:

Kamar yadda aka fada, akwai "masanin kimiyya" guda ɗaya: Yi wasa. Kuma a'a, babu karatun 8 na tabbatarwa.

SABUNTARWA: Tun daga farkon shekarar 2019, Park et al ., 2016 an ambato shi daga wasu takardu sama da 50 da aka yi nazari a kansu , kuma ita ce takarda da aka fi kallo a tarihin mujallar Behavioral Sciences.

----

Yuli, 2019 - Ta sake yin rubutu a shafin Twitter, kamar yadda Wikipedia mai yiwuwa Prause sockpuppet ya saka wannan bayanin a cikin MDPI Wikipedia.

Hanya zuwa ga sigar da aka gyara tana nuna cewa ba a rage darajar MDPI a shekarar 2019 ba (kuskuren ma'aikacin gwamnati ne aka gyara daga ƙarshe). Duk da cewa ƙimar 2020 na iya zama kuskure, rajistar Norway ta nuna "0' - amma "ba sake ba". Lura cewa Prause yana ƙoƙarin yaudarar jama'a ta hanyar aika hotunan allo guda biyu na ƙimar a shafin Twitter; ɗaya tare da 2020 kawai, da kuma hoton allo na kuskuren 2019 wanda aka gyara daga baya. Hotunan allo na Prause:

Na farko nuna kawai 2020

Na biyu ya nuna kuskuren da ba a yi ba:

An yi wa Prause ƙarya game da ƙimar MDPI ta 2019 (kuma daga baya ta yi ƙarya game da ƙimar 2020) kamar yadda aka gani a cikin hoton allo na ƙimar 2020 :

A lokaci guda da rubutun Prause mai ruɗi, wani sunan Wikipedia mai suna "sabon" ya saka ƙimar 2020 a cikin shafin Wikipedia.

Franck Vazquez, Ph.D. (Babban jami'in kimiyya na MDPI) ya kira Sallah a kwance:

Da alama za a daidaita ƙimar 2020 a farkon shekara ( ya kasance ).

A cikin martani, Prause ya buga tsohuwar watan 3-wata Frank Vasquez tweet:

An kama wani ƙarya game da ƙimar Norway. Hanya madaidaiciya zuwa shafin kimantawa ga kowace mujalla: https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/VedtakNiva1 . Nemi MDPI kuma za ku ga cewa duk mujallunta suna da ƙimar "1", gami da Kimiyyar Halayya , inda aka buga Park et al., 2016.

------

Agusta, 2019: Prause da David Ley sun haɗu don yin ƙarya game da Park et al ., 2016. An buga takardar a cikin wani zaren da Ley ya yi ba daidai ba game da binciken jihar, yana da'awar cewa jarabar batsa ba ta wanzu ba. Nan da nan Ley ya amsa da ɓata suna - yana da'awar cewa marubutan sun biya Park et al. , 2016 da aka buga:

Gary Wilson ya gyara ƙaryar Ley :

Nicole Prause ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter cewa karyarta ta yi , tana mai cewa an "biya marubutan 8 don kiranta jaraba".

Anan ta sake komawa, karkashin tweet guda:

Kamar yadda Shugaba na MDPI ya bayyana , ainihin ƙimar ta faru ne a shekarar 2020.

SABUNTARWA (2020): kamar yadda kuke gani, MDPI koyaushe ana kimanta ta a matsayin #1 - (kuma Prause koyaushe yana ƙarya game da ƙimar MDPI):

-------------------------------

Prause da Ley sun yi sharhi a ƙarƙashin wani rubutu a shafin yanar gizo na Psychology Today na watan Agusta, 2016 wanda Mark Castleman ya wallafa. Rubutun Castleman yana cike da ƙarya game da Park et al. , 2016 da Grubbs da Gola, 2016. Castleman yana ƙarya game da yourbrainonporn.com, yana iƙirarin cewa muna ɓatar da bincike ko kuma muna lissafa nazarin da ba daidai ba.

Kamar kowane mai nayasayer amma ya kasa bayar da misali guda ɗaya na ƙarya. Hakanan yana ƙarya a cikin gabatarwarsa game da abin da YBOP ya ce game da ED da batsa ya haifar. Duk abin da ya yi iƙirari game da Park et al. ƙarya ne: abubuwan da ke ciki, iƙirarinsa, mayar da hankali kan sa, nazarin shari'o'i, ambato, kun ambaci hakan. Wannan bai kamata ya zama abin mamaki ba domin Castleman ya buga labarai da yawa don tallafawa masana'antar batsa (duk suna da son zuciya kuma ba daidai ba ne a kimiyya). Ba mai bincike ko mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali ba ne, ɗan jarida ne kawai mai ajanda. Labaran Castleman sun kuma tallata realyourbrainonporn.com a matsayin tushen gaskiya game da tasirin batsa. Babu shakka game da shigar Prause da Ley cikin wasansa na yanzu.

Da farko jawabin Ley:

'Yan tsokaci game da ƙaryar Ley da juyawa.

LEY - An buga shi a cikin jarida mara kyau sosai a ƙarƙashin yanayi mai ban mamaki.

Kwararren havwararrun Pubwararrun Pubabi'a an buga su, ba kamar mujallu waɗanda suka karɓi ra'ayoyin Ley na 2 ba (misali Jaridar Nazarin Batsa, Rahoton Kiwon Lafiyar Jima'i na Yanzu).

LEY - Babu ɗayan marubutan da ke da ƙwarewa game da lafiyar jima'i, ko ilimin jima'i kuma da yawa daga cikin likitan ido ne?

Ley na al'ada. Daga cikin marubutan guda takwas sun kasance likitoci bakwai tare da ƙwararrun masu zuwa: likitan urologists biyu, masanin ilimin ƙwaƙwalwa, da likitocin kwakwalwa biyu, da kuma babban likita. " Authoraya daga cikin marubucin, Dr. Klam, Daraktan Kiwan Lafiya na Cibiyar Nazarin Naval - San Diego. Amma ga likitan likitan ido, Dokta Doan duka MD ne kuma PhD (Neuroscience - Johns Hopkins), tsohon shugaban "ictionsarfafa Magunguna ne da Nazarin Cutar da Magunguna" a Sashen Lafiyar Hauka a Cibiyar Nazarin Naval. Baya ga takardu a kan batsa ta hanyar intanet, Doan ya wallafa takardu da yawa kan jarabar halayyar / jijiyoyin da suka shafi fasahar zamani, (ya wallafa karatun da aka yi wa abokan karatunmu kafin ma ya kammala karatun sakandare).

LEY - Binciken likita da aka bayyana a cikin labarin Park suna da matukar damuwa. A cikin binciken shari'ar farko, marubutan sun bayyana cewa sun sanar da mai haƙuri cewa "amfani da abin wasa na jima'i na iya lalata jijiyoyin azzakarin sa," wata sanarwa mai ban mamaki da mara tallafi don bugawa, ba tare da binciken urological ba.

Ley yana tsammanin yana da haɓaka ga likitoci su ba da shawarar yin watsi da abin wasan yara da batsa (duk da cewa matuƙin jirgin ruwan yana da matsananciyar damuwa game da wasan yara / wasan batsa). Wani sharhi da aka gabatar daga rahoton-karar da aka fallasa shawarar Ley a matsayin zalunci:

Aikin 20 mai aiki na aiki ya shiga ma'aikacin Caucasian wanda aka gabatar da matsalolin samun halayen lokacin haɗuwa don watanni shida da suka gabata. Ya fara faru yayin da aka tura shi waje. Ya fara dashi don kimanin sa'a daya ba tare da wani motsa jiki ba, kuma azzakarinsa ya tafi. Matsalolinsa na ci gaba da yin gyare-gyare da kuma ci gaba da haɗari sun ci gaba a duk lokacin da yake aiki. Tun dawowarsa, bai kasance cikin damar yin jima'i ba tare da abokin aurensa. Zai iya yin ginawa amma ba zai iya yin amfani da shi ba, kuma bayan 10-15 min zai rasa haɗinsa, wanda ba haka ba ne kafin ya sami abubuwan ED. Wannan ya haifar da matsala a cikin dangantakarsa da marigayinsa.

Mai haƙuri ya amince da al'aura kamar yadda akeyi "shekaru", kuma sau ɗaya ko sau biyu kusan kullun don shekarun da suka gabata. Ya ba da goyon baya ga kallon batsa na Intanet don motsawa. Tun lokacin da ya sami damar yin amfani da yanar gizo mai tsayi, ya dogara ne kawai da batsa ta yanar gizo. Da farko, "batsa mai laushi", inda abun cikin ba dole bane ya hada da ainihin ma'amala, "yaudarar". Koyaya, sannu a hankali ya buƙaci ƙarin hoto ko ɗan hoto don kawowa. Ya ba da rahoton buɗe bidiyo da yawa a lokaci guda kuma yana kallon sassan da suka fi ƙarfafawa. Lokacin da yake shirin tura shi kimanin shekara daya da suka gabata, ya damu matuka game da kasancewarsa abokiyar zama. Don haka, ya sayi abin wasan yara na jima'i, wanda ya bayyana a matsayin "farjin karya". Wannan na'urar ta fara motsawa sosai har ta kai inzali a cikin minti.

A hankali, ba shi da tarihin rashin lafiya, tiyata, ko kuma maganin lafiyar jiki. Bai dauki magunguna ko kari ba. Ya ƙaryata game da amfani da kayan taba amma sha wasu sha a cikin jam'iyyun sau ɗaya ko sau biyu a wata. Ya taba shan taba daga shan barasa. Ya bayar da rahotanni ga abokan jima'i da yawa da suka wuce, amma tun lokacin da yake da albashinsa a shekara guda, matarsa ta kasance abokin aurenta. Ya ƙaryata game da tarihin cututtukan cututtuka da ake yi da jima'i. A jarrabawar jiki, alamunsa masu mahimmanci sun kasance al'ada, kuma jarrabawar jima'i ya kasance bayyanar jiki ba tare da raunuka ko masarau ba.

A ƙarshen ziyarar, an bayyana masa cewa amfani da abin wasa na jima'i ya zama sanadin rage girman jijiyoyinsa da kallon kallon batsa na Intanet sun canza bakin sa don motsawar jima'i. An shawarce shi da ya daina amfani da abin wasa da kallon wasan bidiyo na batsa. An kira shi zuwa urology don ƙarin kimantawa.

Lokacin da likitan fitsari ya gan shi 'yan makonni bayan haka, ya rage yawan amfani da batsa ta intanet sosai, duk da cewa ya ce ba zai iya dainawa gaba ɗaya ba. Ya daina amfani da abin wasan. Yana sake yin inzali ta hanyar jima'i da amaryarsa, kuma dangantakarsu ta inganta.

Evidencearin shaidar cewa Ley yakamata ta bayar da shawarar jima'i.

Bayanin da wani baƙon Prause ya yi (ba ta yi istibra'i ba kamar kanta yayin da ta shiga cikin shari'oin 2 kamar na watan Agusta, 2016):

Sharhi mara kyau kamar Park et al., 2016 ba bincike bane, amma nazari ne. Kamar yadda aka fallasa a shafin na yanzu, Gunaguni yana kwance game da matsalolin ɗabi'a da rahoton shari'ar. Amma me kuke tsammani daga masanin yanar gizo na MDPI?

Wani sharhi da wani wanda ake kira Prause wanda aka ce masa:

Kamar yadda ke sama, Park ta bita ce, don haka ba ta gabatar da bayanan gwaji ba. Koyaya, ya ƙunshi babban bayanai a duk faɗin kuma nassoshi na 200.

------

Janairu, 2017 (kuma a baya): Yin wasa yana amfani da puan tsana da yawa (ciki har da “NotGaryWilson“) Don gyara shafukan Wikipedia

Amfani da asusun masu amfani da yawa don gyara shafukan Wikipedia ya karya dokokin Wikipedia kuma ana kiransa da " ƙawayen sock" (ko kuma kawai "socking"). Mun riga mun bayyana ɗaya daga cikin ƙawayen sock na Prause , wanda ya gyara shafin Wikipedia na Belinda Luscombe a wannan rana bayan TIME ta buga labarin murfin Luscombe, " Batsa da Barazana ga Ƙwayar cuta ," wanda Prause bai amince da shi ba. A bayyane yake daga sharhi, abun ciki, da sunayen masu amfani cewa Nicole Prause ta ƙirƙiri ƙarin asusu da yawa don gyara labaran Wikipedia, kamar " jarabar batsa ," " jarabar jima'i " da " tasirin batsa ."

Da farko, ga jerin gyare-gyaren da wani ɗan tsana mai suna Prause sock ya yi wanda aka gano ta adireshin IP kawai ( 75.82.147.215 ). Lura da sharhin da ke da alaƙa da wannan gyara ɗaya:

· 19:06, 19 Janairu 2015 ( bambanci | tarihi ) . . (-9,453) ‎ . . Sha'awar batsa ‎ (Wannan sashe ya yi magana ne kawai game da delta fos-B, wanda ba a taɓa bincika shi ba dangane da batsa. Gary Wilson, wani sanannen mai rubutun batsa wanda ke samun kuɗi daga "sha'awar batsa" ya ƙara wannan sashe, domin shi kaɗai ne ke tallata shi. Ya kamata a cire shi.) ( Tag : ɓangaren ɓoyewa)

Suna "Gary Wilson" kyauta ce ta mutu cewa asusun mai amfani na sama shine Nicole Prause. Binciken Gaskiya: Gary Wilson ba shi da kuɗin da ya danganci wannan ƙoƙarin, kuma bai ƙara sashin DeltaFosB ba a cikin shafin Wiki na "Addiction batsa" Yayin da lokaci ya wuce, Gwadawa ta sake komawa cikin tsarinta na yau da kullun na ƙirƙirar sunayen masu amfani tare da ƙananan kalmomin 3-4. Misali:

Duk da cewa gyare-gyaren da ke sama sun nuna cewa duk suna da alaƙa da yin amfani da IITAP, Carnes, samfurin jaraba, kuma suna da'awar ƙarya cewa babu wani kimiyya da ke goyon bayan jarabar batsa ko jima'i. Idan akwai wata shakka, biyu daga cikinsu sun sake yin tsokaci game da Gary Wilson da DeltaFosB . Da farko, wani sharhi mai ban sha'awa na "PatriotsAllTheWay":

04:55, 21 Janairu 2015 ( bambanci | tarihi ) . . (-9,433) ‎ . . Sha'awar batsa ‎ (Ba a taɓa haɗa Delata fos B da halayen jima'i a cikin mutane ba, ba sau ɗaya ba. Gary Wilson ne ya ƙara wannan sashe, yana tallata littafinsa don samun riba daga ra'ayin iri ɗaya.) ( Tag : ɓangaren ɓoyewa)

Wasu 'yan tsokaci: 1) Duk ribar da Gary Wilson ya samu daga sayar da littafinsa tana zuwa ga agaji, kuma gidan yanar gizon sa ba na kasuwanci ba ne gaba ɗaya; 2) Sabanin iƙirarin Prause, DeltaFosB yana cikin mutane kuma duk masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi da ke nazarin hanyoyinsa sun yarda cewa DeltaFosb yana da hannu a ayyuka da yawa na jiki, gami da jan hankali ga ayyukan jima'i da jaraba.

An ƙirƙiri “shafin mai amfani” na Wikipedia ta atomatik don kowane sunan mai amfani wanda zai gyara labarin Wikipedia. "NotGaryWilson" shine kawai Prausean tsana da aka yi amfani da shi don yin tsokaci akan shafin mai amfani da shi. Ga abin da "NotGaryWilson" ya rubuta game da labarin "Jima'i Jima'i" labarin:

Kamar yadda ka sani, kungiyoyin batsa suna shafe wadannan shafukan don riba. Delta FOSb ba shi da tallafi na kai tsaye, amma ya kasance mai ra'ayin kirki ne daga Gary Wilson, ya biya dan gwagwarmaya. Don haka, a, ina nufin cire littafin kuma zan ci gaba da cire shi. Zan ƙara barazanar baya. Babu shaida da ke nuna goyon bayan da Wilson ke yi, wanda shine dalilin da ya sa yana da sauƙi don duba rubutunsa.

Kamar yadda yake a shafin Wikipedia na "Addiction Pornography", Gary Wilson a zahiri bai ƙara wani abu daga cikin DeltaFosB a shafin Wikipedia na "Addiction Jima'i" ba. Kamar yadda aka faɗa, Wilson ba ya biyan kuɗi, kuma ba ya samun kuɗi a wannan aikin. A ƙarshe, waɗanda ba malamai ba ne kawai David Ley da Nicole Prause sun taɓa tabbatar da cewa DeltaFosB ba ta da hannu wajen fara canje-canje a kwakwalwa da suka shafi jaraba. (Prause yana da sha'awar ɓata sunan DeltaFosB.) Sabanin maganganunsu marasa tallafi, rawar da DeltaFosB ke takawa a jaraba da kuma fahimtar mutane ta tabbata sosai a cikin nazarin dabbobi da na ɗan adam (duba jerin 1 da jerin 2 don nazarin DeltaFosB). Wani tsohon editan Wikipedia ya amsa ga sharhin da ke sama daga "NotGaryWilson":

Ni C.Fred ne . Na lura cewa kwanan nan ka cire wasu abubuwan da ke cikin jarabar jima'i ba tare da yin cikakken bayani game da dalilin ba. A nan gaba, zai zama da amfani ga wasu idan ka bayyana canje-canjen da ka yi wa Wikipedia tare da taƙaitaccen gyara . Idan wannan kuskure ne, kada ka damu; an dawo da abubuwan da aka cire.

kuma,

Daga sunan mai amfaninka, ya bayyana sarai cewa kana da hanyar da za ka bi wajen yin tsokaci kan batun. Yanke manyan sassa daga labarin ba hanya ce mai kyau ba don yin hakan. Kana buƙatar tattauna canje-canjenka a shafin tattaunawa kuma ka sami goyon baya mai yawa a gare su. — C.Fred ( magana ) 00:48, 16 Janairu 2017 (UTC)

Kada ka riƙe numfashinka don tallafi (halattacce) don da'awar da ba a tallafawa game da Wilson ko DeltaFosB. Wani lokaci Prause tana amfani da adireshin IP azaman sunan mai amfani. Wannan mai amfani da Wikipedia kawai yayi gyara "Jima'i Jima'i" yana gulma game da "FosB" da CSATs & IITAP - biyu daga cikin abubuwan da aka fi so na Prause:

185.51.228.243 - duk gudummawa

Da alama Nicole Prause ta yi amfani da ƙarin sunayen masu amfani guda biyu don gyara shafin Wikipedia na Fight The New Drug (FTND yana ɗaya daga cikin abubuwan da Prause ta fi so):

Me ke sa mu yi zargin cewa sunayen masu amfani biyu Nicole Prause ne? Ba wai kawai sunayen masu amfani biyu sun gyara shafin Wikipedia na FTND ba , duka biyun sun ƙirƙiri sashin da ke ɗauke da rubutun Prause da aka saba wallafawa a shafin Twitter wanda ya bayyana a cikin Salt Lake City Tribune. Prause ta rubuta sukar tsohon littafin Fight the New Drug , sannan ta shawo kan abokanta 7 na PhD su sanya hannu a kai. Rubutun Prause ya ambaci wasu ambato marasa mahimmanci, yayin da bai bayar da wani bincike da ya dogara da ilimin jijiyoyi ba. Ya kuma yi maganganu na ƙarya da dama game da abubuwan da ke ciki da nassoshi a cikin littafin FTND na baya. Masana da yawa sun amsa da wannan rusa littafin Prause: Op-ed: Wanene ainihin yake ɓatar da kimiyya a kan batsa? (2016).

A ƙarshen Nuwamba, 2017 Prause ta sake roƙon ICD-11 da ta goge shawarar da aka gabatar na "Matsalar halayen jima'i mai wahala" (jarabar jima'i, jarabar batsa). Gabaɗaya hujjarta game da ICD ta dogara ne akan sanarwar manema labarai daga ƙungiyoyin kink guda 3 masu zaman kansu (Cibiyar Kula da Lafiya Mai Kyau, Ƙungiyar Haɗin Kan 'Yancin Jima'i ta Ƙasa, da Ƙungiyar Bincike ta Lafiya ta Alternative Sexualities), da sanarwar AASECT ta 2016. (Bugu da ƙari, ta yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa ATSA ta goyi bayan ra'ayoyinta.) YBOP ta rubuta wani labarin da ke wargaza takardar "matsayin rukuni" da ke adawa da jarabar batsa da jima'i (Nuwamba, 2017) . Bayan 'yan kwanaki Prause ta yi amfani da sabbin sunayen masu amfani guda biyu don gyara shafin Wikipedia na Addiction Addiction, tana ƙara abubuwan da ke kama da buƙatarta ta ICD-11 don kawar da "Matsalar Halayyar Jima'i Mai Wuya":

A wani yanayi mai wuya, wani ma'aikacin Wikipedia ne ya ƙirƙiri shafin Wikipedia na Nicole Prause . Ko menene dalilin wannan ma'aikacin, babu shakka cewa manyan sunayen masu amfani guda biyu da ke gyara wannan shafin sune Prause da kanta:

Kamar yadda aka nuna a sama, sunayen masu amfani na Prause galibi suna ɗauke da kalmomi 2-3 da aka yi wa babban baƙaƙe. Sunan mai amfani na ƙarshe - OM er1970 - wataƙila yana nufin " O rgasmic M edition", kamar yadda gyaran wannan mai amfani ya shafi binciken Prause ne kan tasirin "Orgasmic Mediation " (wanda aka fi sani da "OM"). Prause tana karɓar kuɗi mai yawa don nazarin "fa'idodin" OM , wanda ya haɗa da namiji yana jan mace da shafa clitoris ɗinta . Taron bita na kwanaki 3 na OM yana kashe $3,999.00 ga kowane mutum (idan an biya shi gaba ɗaya). Ya zuwa watan Mayu 2020, shafin onetaste.us yana tallata Orgasmic Meditation, amma ba ya nuna farashi. Hakanan ya bayyana cewa Prause na iya samun masu yin batsa a matsayin batutuwa ta hanyar wata ƙungiyar masu sha'awar masana'antar batsa, Ƙungiyar 'Yancin Magana . An yi zargin cewa an yi amfani da batutuwa da FSC ta samu a cikin binciken bindiga da ta yi hayar kan shirin "Orgasmic Meditation" mai cike da gurbataccen da kuma kasuwanci (wanda FBI ke bincikensa yanzu ).

Aliases Prause ya yi aiki don shirya Wikipedia (yin amfani da fiye da ɗaya suna cin zarafin Wikipedia ne):

Sauran - Afrilu, 2017: Yi wasa da zagi ga Farfesa Gail Dines, PhD, watakila don shiga cikin Opin: Wane ne yake karya tsarin kimiyya akan batsa? (da kari sabuntawa)

Prause, wacce ba ta da alaƙa da kowane cibiyar ilimi tun farkon shekarar 2015, ta kai hari kan Farfesa Dines a cikin Tweet:

Wannan cin mutuncin jama'a wani ɓangare ne na wani zaren da Prause ya kai wa wani ɗalibi a jami'a a Sweden hari saboda ƙoƙarin yin nazarin cin zarafin masu wasan batsa (daga baya Prause ya goge shi).

Wani kuma mai kira da ake kira Gail Dines da kuma Yaƙar Sabuwar Mashawarru (FTND) maƙaryata da kuma "anti-LGBT" da "anti-mace":

-------

Ana kyautata zaton cewa shafin Twitter na @BrainOnPorn shine Prause. wanda ke amfani da shi don ɓata sunan mutanen da Prause ke yi, yayin da yake tallata ajandar masana'antar batsa. A nan, RealYBOP ta buga wani asusu wanda ya ambato Gail Dines (Afrilu 22, 2019).

--------

Troarin haɓaka ta hanyar masana'antar batsa-masana'antu shilin RealYBOP (Mayu, 2019)

------

Babu inda babu, RealYBOP trolls Dines:

RealYBOP ya yi ikirarin cewa ya rubuta binciken, amma Prause bai taba buga wani nazari kan amfani da batsa da jima'i ba.

Wasu - Mayu, 2017: Yi wa SASH hari (Society for Advancement of Sexual Health)

Bayani: Prause ta yi ikirarin cewa ta "kaucewa" kuma ta "ƙaryata" ayyukan kwararrun masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi da dama tare da wani bincike guda ɗaya mai kuskure . An yi ta suka akai-akai game da wannan binciken a cikin littattafan ilimi, kamar yadda aka bayyana a ƙasa.

Wataƙila ya fusata da cewa sabon Takardar Matsayi ta SASH ta yi ƙoƙarin duba yawan shaidar kimiyya game da ilimin jijiyoyi kan batun jarabar halayen jima'i maimakon duba ikirarin Prause, Prause ta wallafa waɗannan da'awar ramuwar gayya marasa adalci. SASH bai taɓa yin tsokaci kan Prause ba.

Tweet #1 zuwa SASH (an goge shi daga baya ta hanyar Prause):

Tweet #2 zuwa SASH (daga baya an goge ta hanyar Prause):

Wasu - Mayu, 2017: Dangane da takarda da aka gabatar a cikin taron urology Prause ya kira Urologists Navy na Amurka "masu gwagwarmaya, ba masanan kimiyya ba."

Abubuwan da ake amfani da su na yau da kullun sun ninka biyu: 1) wulakanta kowane binciken da ke danganta amfani da batsa zuwa sakamako mara kyau, 2) da kaina ya afkawa waɗanda ke cikin binciken. Wadannan halaye suna amfani da burinta, wanda shine "tabbatar" cewa amfani da batsa ba safai yake cutarwa ba, kuma kusan koyaushe yana da amfani. A cikin wannan sakon da ta wallafa a shafinta na Tweeter, ta nuna bacin ranta game da wani binciken da masana kimiyyar sararin samaniyar jirgin ruwan Amurka suka yi, tana cewa su "masu gwagwarmaya ne, ba masana kimiyya ba."

Prause ta biyo bayan wannan harin da sanarwar manema labarai ta "na hukuma" da ke kai hari kan binciken , wanda Prause bai taɓa gani ba. Wani tweet na Prause na biyu ya tabbatar da cewa likitocin "sun tsere daga 'yan jarida saboda kunya." Ba a sami wannan a cikin labarin da Prause ta wallafa ba kuma Prause ba ta halarci taron urology inda aka gabatar da takardar ba:

Dole ne a lura cewa "takardar ED ta Prause," Prause & Pfaus 2015, ba wani bincike ba ne kwata-kwata. Madadin haka, Prause ta yi iƙirarin tattara bayanai daga bincikenta na baya guda huɗu, waɗanda babu ɗaya daga cikinsu da ya magance matsalar rashin ƙarfin mazakuta. Ƙarin matsala: Bayanan da ke cikin takardar Prause & Pfaus (2015) ba su dace da bayanan da ke cikin binciken da aka yi a baya guda huɗu ba. Bambance-bambancen ba su da ƙanana kuma ba a yi bayani ba.

Wani sharhi da mai bincike Richard A. Isenberg MD ya yi , wanda aka buga a cikin Sexual Medicine Open Access, ya nuna da dama (amma ba duka ba) na bambance-bambancen, kurakurai, da kuma da'awar da ba a goyan baya ba ( shawarar da aka yi ta bayyana ƙarin bambance-bambance ). Nicole Prause & Jim Pfaus , marubutan jaridar, sun yi da'awar jama'a da dama na ƙarya ko marasa goyon baya da suka shafi wannan takarda.

Labarai da yawa daga 'yan jarida game da wannan binciken sun yi iƙirarin cewa amfani da batsa ya haifar da mafi kyawun tsagewa, amma ba haka jaridar ta gano ba. A cikin hirarrakin da aka yi rikodin, Prause da Pfaus sun yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa sun auna tsagewa a cikin dakin gwaje-gwaje, kuma cewa mazan da suka yi amfani da batsa suna da tsagewa mafi kyau. A cikin wannan hirar ta Jim Pfaus TV, Pfaus ya ce:

"Mun kalli yadda karfinsu yake don samun karfin tsayuwa a dakin gwaje-gwaje."

"Mun sami haɗin linzami tare da adadin batsa da suke kallo a gida, kuma latenes waɗanda alal misali suna samun tsagewa sun fi sauri."

A cikin wannan hirar rediyo, Prause ya yi iƙirarin cewa an auna tsagewar jiki a cikin dakin gwaje-gwaje. Ainihin ambaton da aka bayar daga wasan kwaikwayon:

"Da yawan mutane suna kallon erotica a gida suna da karfin amsawa a cikin dakin gwaje-gwaje, ba a rage ba."

Amma duk da haka wannan takarda ba ta tantance ingancin gini ba a cikin lab ko "saurin erections." Jaridar kawai ta yi iƙirarin sun nemi mutane su kimanta “sha'awar” su bayan kallon ɗan batsa a taƙaice (kuma ba a bayyane daga jaridu masu tushe ba har ma hakan ya faru a zahiri game da duk batutuwa). A cikin kowane hali, wani yanki daga takardar da kanta ta yarda cewa:

"Babu wani bayani game da al'adar jinsi da za a iya amfani da shi don tallafawa kwarewar maza game da kai."

Babu ko'ina a cikin Prause & Pfaus 2015, ko takardu 4 masu tushe, da aka ambaci ko aka ruwaito ma'aunin aikin jima'i na dakin gwaje-gwaje. Gaskiya? Menene wannan?

Sauran - Satumba 14, 2017: Yi da'awar duk waɗanda suka yi imanin batsa na iya zama lahani da jaraba su ne "ilimin kimiyya da jahilci & misogynistic"

Jirgin zuwa twitter thread (wanda Kalmomin nan daga baya ya share)

Sauran - Janairu 24, 2018: Yi amfani da fayilolin gunaguni marasa tushe game da mai ilimin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout (sashe yana ƙunshe da wasu abubuwan da yawa na ɓatanci da tursasawa)

Ta ci gaba da bin tsarinta na bayan fage na shigar da koke-koke marasa tushe, na cin zarafin duk wanda ra'ayinsa bai yarda da shi ba, Prause ta shigar da koke-koke guda biyu marasa tushe kan mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout, tana zargin Sprout da "ka'idojin makirci." Wannan ya faru ne bayan ta zarge ta da karya a wani rubutu da ta yi a shafin Facebook na yin aiki ba tare da lasisi ba. Lura cewa Prause ta yi ƙoƙarin shawo kan Jihar Washington ta ɓoye koke-koken karya na Prause daga Sprout. Saboda koke-koken ba shi da tushe, ba a ɗauki Prause a matsayin mai fallasa bayanai ba, kuma ba a kare asalinta ba - duk da koke na biyu da Prause ta yi nacewa tana da matsayin mai fallasa bayanai.

---------------------

A cewar bayanan, Washington ta karɓi ƙarar Prause a ranar 24 ^ga Janairu , kuma an buɗe shari'ar a ^ranar 30 ga Janairu . Bayan kwana biyu (1 ga Fabrairu ⁾ Jihar Washington ta yi watsi da ƙarar da babu komai (ba tare da bincike ba) ta kuma rufe shari'ar, tana mai bayyana cewa ko da zarge-zargen gaskiya ne, babu wata keta doka da za ta faru.

Domin fahimtar rashin gaskiya da rashin hankali na Prause, duba "ƙorafin" da ta yi wa Jihar Washington. Prause ta yi niyya ga rubutun Sprout mai zuwa, wanda ke kan sashin matsalar halayyar jima'i mai wahala (CSBD) na ICD-11 (ba za ku iya karanta sharhin ba sai kun ƙirƙiri sunan mai amfani):

Bugu da ƙari, kada mu yi watsi da la'akari da bukatun kuɗi na waɗanda ke cin gajiyar biliyoyin daga halayen da ba a san su ba, halayen lalata. Misalai biyu masu sauƙi: "kyauta" shafukan batsa "kyauta" waɗanda aka biya don talla, da masu kera magunguna na magungunan ED. Suna iya ma da masu son shiga harabar.

Mahallin: An yi bayanin da ke sama a cikin babban martani ga yawancin maganganun Nicole Prause inda Kalmomin da kaina suka kai hari kan masu kwantar da hankali da kungiyoyi (IITAP, SASH, ASAM) don ana zaton "cin ribar jima'i da jarabar batsa." Gunaguni ya ɓatar da shekaru 2 da suka gabata cikin damuwa akan rubutun ICD-11 beta, yana yin iya ƙoƙarinta don hana binciken CSBD daga sanya shi cikin littafin ƙarshe. (Attemptoƙarin nata bai yi nasara ba, kuma CSBD yanzu yana cikin ICD-11 - duba ƙasa.) A zahiri, Gwadawa ya ba da ƙarin bayani fiye da kowa.

Lokacin da Sprout ya yi ƙoƙari ya nuna maƙasudin masu amfani da ita, Dokar ta nuna ta zuwa Washington State! A nan an yi wa Kwamitin ƙararrakin kisa:

Keta Hakki: An bayyana cewa muna da "masu ra'ayin mazan jiya " da kuma "shafukan batsa waɗanda ake biyan kuɗi don talla, da kuma masana'antar magunguna na ED". Babu ɗaya daga cikin waɗannan da yake gaskiya. Ni da duk abokan aikina waɗanda ke buga kimiyya da aka yi nazari a kansu ba mu da wani ƙoƙarin "masu ra'ayin mazan jiya". Waɗannan ka'idojin makircin sun bayyana an tallata su ne don tallafawa littattafanta da kuma amfanar da aikinta na magani.

Ka lura da yadda Prause ta yi ƙarya, tana cewa maganar Sprout game da Prause ne da abokan aikinta da ba a san su ba - kuma ba haka ba, kamar yadda Sprout ya rubuta a zahiri, game da biliyoyin da "shafukan batsa kyauta" (mafi yawan mallakar Mindgeek masu arziki) da " masu samar da magunguna na magungunan ED" suka yi. A takaice, wannan ba ƙarar gaskiya ba ce; kawai cin zarafi ne.

Ƙarar Prause ta biyu ga Washington

Ba ta gamsu da martanin da Washington ta mayar ba, kuma ta fusata cewa an bayyana kuskurenta wajen shigar da ƙarar da ba ta da tushe a kan Sprout a wannan shafin, Prause ta shigar da ƙara ta biyu a kan Sprout. Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa tana da "matsayin mai fallasa bayanai." Jihar ta sake nuna rashin amincewa, kuma Washington ta sake fitar da wasiƙar da ta shafi Sprout:

---------------------

Sabuntawa (5-14-18) : Sharhi yana cin zarafi da ɓata sunan Staci Sprout a shafinta na Facebook - yana da'awar cewa Sprout ba ta da lasisi:

-----

Sabuntawa (6-8-18): "Sigar aiwatarwa" ta ICD-11 ( Rarraba Cututtuka ta Duniya ta Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya - littafin binciken lafiya da aka fi amfani da shi a duniya) yanzu an fitar da shi (har zuwa watan Yuni, 2018). Marubutan ta kwararru kan lafiyar kwakwalwa sun haɗa da wani bincike da za a iya amfani da shi don gano duk wanda ke fama da halayen jima'i na tilas (gami da jarabar halayen jima'i) mai suna " Matsalar Halayyar Jima'i ta Tilas ."

Kafin fitar da "sigar aiwatarwa," an kuma sanya daftarin beta na ICD-11 a yanar gizo, kuma an samar da shi ga masu sha'awar su yi tsokaci a kai. (Ana buƙatar rajista mai sauƙi don kallo da shiga.) Lura: Prause ya buga ƙarin tsokaci a cikin sashin sharhi na beta-draft fiye da yadda kowa ya haɗa. A cikin sashin sharhi a ƙarƙashin wannan sabon shawara , Prause ta kai hari ga Staci Sprout, tana da'awar ƙarya cewa Sprout "yana ƙarƙashin ci gaba da bincike" daga Jihar Washington. A zahiri, kamar yadda aka bayyana kuma aka rubuta a sama, Washington ta yi watsi da koke-koken Prause guda biyu marasa tushe.

Addu'a ta kasa ambaton alaƙarta da, da kuma goyon bayanta ga masana'antar batsa.

------

Mayu, 2019: David Ley da RealYBOP ( Pruse alias account ) suna ɓatar da saƙon Twitter na Staci Sprout. Sprout bai ce komai ba game da "jarabar jima'i":

RealYBOP (Prause) ta wallafa hanyar haɗi zuwa wani ɓangare daga imel ɗin Prause na Geoffrey Reed (akan RealYBOP). Geoffrey Reed ba kakakin WHO na hukuma ba ne, kuma wannan imel ne na sirri kawai zuwa ga Prause don ya cire ta daga bayansa. A gaskiya ma, kakakin WHO ɗaya ne kawai ya yi tsokaci game da CSBD - Christian Lindmeier. Idan kuna da wata shakka game da ainihin yanayin kamfen ɗin Prause/RealYBOP, a hankali ku karanta wannan labarin mai alhakin game da matsalar halayen jima'i na tilastawa (CSBD) . Ya ambaci mai magana da yawun WHO na hukuma Christian Lindmeier. Lindmeier yana ɗaya daga cikin jami'ai huɗu kacal da aka jera a wannan shafin: Lambobin sadarwa a hedikwatar WHO - kuma kakakin WHO kaɗai da ya yi tsokaci a hukumance game da CSBD! Labarin SELF ya kuma yi hira da Shane Kraus, wanda ke tsakiyar ƙungiyar aiki ta ICD-11 ta Matsalar Halayyar Jima'i (CSBD). Karin bayani tare da ambato daga Lindmeir ya bayyana a sarari cewa WHO ba ta ƙi "jarabar jima'i" ba:

Dangane da CSBD, babban abin da aka yi jayayya a kai shi ne ko ya kamata a rarraba wannan cuta a matsayin jaraba ko a'a. "Akwai muhawarar kimiyya da ake ci gaba da yi kan ko matsalar jima'i ta tilastawa ta zama bayyanar jarabar ɗabi'a," in ji mai magana da yawun WHO Christian Lindmeier ga SELF. " WHO ba ta amfani da kalmar jarabar jima'i saboda ba mu ɗauki matsayi game da ko jaraba ce ta jiki ko a'a ba ."

Wata takarda ta WHO a watan Janairu, 2019 ta kuma tattauna CSBD ( Sabbin abubuwa da canje-canje a cikin rarrabuwar ICD-11 na cututtukan tunani, ɗabi'a da ci gaban jijiyoyi ):

Halin halayen halayen jima'i yana da alaƙa da rashin cin nasara akan halayen jima'i ko jarabawa, wanda ya haifar da halayen jima'i na tsawon lokacin (misali, watanni shida ko fiye) wanda ke haifar da wahala ko rashin lafiyar mutum, iyali, zamantakewa , ilimi, sana'a ko wasu muhimman wuraren da suke aiki.

Kodayake wannan nau'in halitta yayi kama da mahimmancin abu, an haɗa shi a cikin ɓangaren ƙwayoyin cuta na ICD-11 don gane rashin rashin bayani game da ko matakan da ke tattare da ci gaba da kulawa da cutar sun kasance daidai da wadanda aka lura a cikin cuta masu amfani da kuma cin zarafin hali.

Sakon Sprout ya yi daidai, bai faɗi komai game da "jarabar jima'i ba", kuma ya haɗa da wata takarda ta 2019 ta WHO a cikin World Psychiatry:

Sabuwar takardar WHO da aka haɗa da sprout (Geoffrey Reed yana ɗaya daga cikin marubutan) ta yi kira ga ɗabi'ar Prause akan sashin sharhi na ICD-11: Sharhin masu ruwa da tsaki na jama'a kan surori na ICD-11 da suka shafi lafiyar kwakwalwa da jima'i (2019). WHO ta tattauna sharhin jama'a da aka yi kan matsalolin kwakwalwa na ICD-11 da aka gabatar, gami da "rashin lafiyar halayen jima'i na tilastawa" inda Nicole Prause ta buga sharhi fiye da kowa da kowa (22), ta raina mutane da ƙungiyoyi, yin zarge-zargen ƙarya da kuma shiga cikin ɓatanci. Nau'in da ba shi da ƙarfi ya bayyana sharhin Prause:

Matsalar halayen jima'i mai tilastawa ta sami mafi girman adadin gabatarwar dukkan cututtukan kwakwalwa (N=47), amma sau da yawa daga mutane iri ɗaya (N=14). An yi muhawara mai zurfi kan gabatar da wannan nau'in bincike 3 kuma sharhi kan ma'anar ICD-11 ya sake bayyana rarrabuwar kawuna a fagen. Abubuwan da aka gabatar sun haɗa da maganganun ƙiyayya tsakanin masu sharhi, kamar zarge-zargen rikicin sha'awa ko rashin iyawa (48%) ko iƙirarin cewa wasu ƙungiyoyi ko mutane za su amfana daga haɗawa ko ware su a cikin ICD-11 (43%).

Danna nan idan kuna son karanta sharhin jama'a game da sassan CSBD na ICD-11 (gami da waɗanda ke nuna ƙiyayya/ba'a/ƙazanta). Kuna buƙatar yin rijista da sunan mai amfani don duba sharhi.

Prause ta shiga cikin batanci a matsayin kanta (maimakon RealYBOP ):

Rashin daidaito ta wurin Amfani: 1) Duk abin da Sprout tweeted yayi daidai, 2) WHO ba ta taɓa magana da Sprout ba (wannan haƙiƙar mahaukaci ne).

Lura: Ƙari a kan Fassara asusun alias:

-------

RealYBOP (asusun lissafi na Nicole Prause) ya ɓata Staci Sprout.

A zahiri, ɗaruruwan asusun Twitter sun yi ba'a da tweet ɗin Prause mara hankali da kuma ba daidai ba da ke ikirarin cewa wani bincike ya karyata "tatsuniyar cewa maza suna kallon batsa fiye da mata". Misali, a cikin wannan zaren RealYBOP masana kimiyya da yawa sun yi wa RealYBOP ba'a (a martanin da ta bayar ta yi jayayya cewa buguwa ba ya lalata tuki!):

Ƙarin kaɗan, kiran RealYBOP daga:

An bayyana RealYBOP.

--------

Nuwamba, 2019: Staci Sprout ta yi bidiyo tana goyon bayan wani mai tara kuɗi daga wanda ya kafa NoFap Alexander Rhodes da laifin ɓata suna akan Nicole Prause / Liberos . A cikin ramuwar gayya RealYBOP (wani sunan da aka fi sani da Nicole Prause) ta yi Allah wadai da Staci Sprout:

Duk da yake RealYBOP ba ta ba da sunan Sprout, amma ta tirka hotunan hoto.

---------

Sabuntawa :

Sauran - Janairu 29, 2018: Yin amfani da barazana ga masu kwantar da hankalinsu wanda zasu gano zinare ta hanyar yin jima'i ta hanyar amfani da cutar "lalata zubar da ciki" a cikin ICD-11

Fushinta abin ban mamaki ne ganin yadda kwararru da ke aiki a ICD-11 suka rubuta, a cikin mujallar ilimin halin dan Adam ta duniya cewa,

A halin yanzu, akwai tattaunawa mai zurfi kan kimiyya game da ko matsalar jima'i ta tilastawa na iya zama bayyanar jarabar ɗabi'a[ 5 ]. Ga ICD-11, an ba da shawarar a ɗauki matsayi mai ra'ayin mazan jiya, tare da fahimtar cewa har yanzu ba mu da cikakken bayani kan ko hanyoyin da ke tattare da haɓakawa da kula da wannan cuta sun yi daidai da waɗanda aka lura da su a cikin matsalolin amfani da miyagun ƙwayoyi, caca da wasanni [ 6 ]. Saboda wannan dalili, matsalar halayen jima'i ta tilastawa ba a haɗa ta a cikin haɗakar cututtuka ta ICD-11 saboda amfani da miyagun ƙwayoyi da halayen jaraba ba, amma a cikin tawayar sarrafa sha'awa. Fahimtar matsalar halayen jima'i ta tilastawa za ta bunƙasa yayin da bincike ya bayyana yanayin da tushen cututtukan jijiyoyi na yanayin [ 7 ].

Duk wanda ya yi la'akari da matsalar da aka gabatar da kanta zai iya ganin cewa an yi nufin ya ƙunshi masu jarabar halayen jima'i ta kowace irin lakabi.

Prause ta cika alkawarinta ta hanyar shigar da koke-koke na karya na hukumar jiha kan Staci Sprout LCSW , DJ Burr LMHC , Linda Hatch PhD , Donald Hilton MD , likitocin sojojin ruwa na Amurka har ma da Gary Wilson . An yi watsi da duk koke-koken a matsayin marasa inganci.

updates:

Sauran - Fabrairu, 2018: Yin amfani da karya game da binciken binciken kwakwalwa (Seok & Sohn, 2018) ta hanyar masana ilimin kimiya

Wannan sashe ya shafi wani bincike na batsa ta intanet da masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi na Koriya Seok da Sohn suka yi ( binciken PubMed don Ji-woo Seok ) - Rashin sinadarin launin toka da kuma canjin yanayin hutu a cikin mafi girman gyrus na lokaci tsakanin mutanen da ke da matsalar halayyar jima'i (2018). Yin amfani da ƙaryar ƙarya ya bayyana cewa babu "masu iko don duk wani rudani":

Ba haka ba ne, amma kafin mu isa ga gaskiya, ya kamata a lura cewa ikirarinta yana da ƙarfin hali ƙwarai, kamar yadda nazarin Prause guda 3 kan masu amfani da batsa suka kasa sarrafa komai, gami da tantancewa don tabbatar da cewa sun kamu da batsa ( Previous et al. , 2013 , Steele et al ., 2013 , Prause et al. , 2015). A zahiri, waɗannan nazarin Prause guda 3 sun zaɓi yin watsi da ƙa'idodi da yawa na keɓewa waɗanda aka saba amfani da su a cikin nazarin jaraba, kamar yanayin tabin hankali, wasu jaraba, magungunan psychotropic, amfani da miyagun ƙwayoyi, wasu tilastawa, baƙin ciki, addini, shekaru, jima'i, jinsi, da sauransu.

A zahiri, Seok & Sohn, 2018 an bincika batutuwa da kyau don "jarabar jima'i" (PHB). PHB an bayyana shi ta hanyar ƙwararrun likitoci guda biyu bisa ga tambayoyin asibiti ta amfani da ka'idojin binciken PHB waɗanda aka saita a cikin binciken da suka gabata, Table S1. Seok & Sohn kuma ana sarrafa su don yawancin canje-canje. Daga Seok & Sohn, 2018:

Mun yi amfani da waɗannan sharuɗɗan keɓewa ga mahalarta PHB da masu kula da su: shekaru sama da 35 ko ƙasa da 18; wasu jaraba kamar jarabar shan giya ko caca, cututtukan tabin hankali na baya ko na yanzu, cututtukan jijiyoyi, da na lafiya, luwaɗi, shan magani a halin yanzu, tarihin mummunan rauni a kai, da kuma rashin bin ka'idojin MRI gabaɗaya (watau, samun ƙarfe a jiki, tsananin astigmatism, ko claustrophobia).

Bugu da ƙari, Seok & Sohn 2018 sun tantance (sarrafawa don) masu sauye-sauye na halin ɗumbin yawa, gami da ɓacin rai. Daga karatun su:

Don gano halayyar rashin daidaituwa a tsakanin batutuwa da PHB, Inventory Depression Inventory (BDI) (Beck et al., 1996), Ingantacin Ingantacin Beck (BAI) (Beck da Steer, 1990), da Scale II (BIS-II) na Barrett II, kamar yadda Lee (1992) ya daidaita. An yi amfani da kashi biyu na BIS-II a matsayin mai haɗin gwiwa don cire sakamakon impulsivity. BIS-II ta ƙunshi tambayoyi 35 tare da amsa tambayoyin "yes" (1) ko "a'a" (0). Kwanan jimlar jigilar daga 0 zuwa 35, tare da matsayi mafi girma wanda ya nuna matakan girma na impulsivity. Bayani game da alƙaluma da halayen kwakwalwa na duk mahalarta an gabatar su a cikin 1 Table.

A taƙaice, Yi wa ƙarya ƙarya.

Maris, 2018 - Da'awar da'awar cewa an kori Gary Wilson daga Jami'ar Ore Oregon

Mai yin amfani da yanar gizo na Gary Wilson, Dr. Nicole Prause , ta shirya wani rubutu mai ɓatanci , wanda ta wallafa a wani gidan yanar gizo na masana'antar manya. An cire shi bayan Wilson ya wallafa wannan a shafinsa na Twitter . (Asali: http://mikesouth.com/scumbags/dr-nicole-prause-destroys-yourbrainonporn-dont-fall-22064/).

Shafin da ke dauke da yanki na kyauta mai dadi na Prause ya bayyana kansa kamar haka:

Shafin yanar gizo na masana'antar manya na Mike South, babban wurin da ake samun labaran manya tun daga shekarar 1998. Mike South ɗan ƙaramin mai shirya fina-finan batsa ne, wanda ya lashe kyaututtuka biyu na AVN, ya zama majagaba a shafin labaran manya. An ambaci South a shafukan labarai da dama, kuma Gawker.com ya amince da shi a matsayin " sarkin gonzo na jita-jita game da batsa ".

Yi aiki tare da Mike South yana ba da cikakkiyar shaida game da haɗin masana'antar batsa:

A cikin lalata ta, Yi magana da sani, ƙarya ya faɗi cewa,

[Gary Wilson] ya yi iƙirarin cewa ya kasance “farfesa a Biology”. A zahiri, yakamata ya kasance mai koyar da karatun digiri, ba farfesa ba, don sashen lab a Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon. An kori shi ba tare da biya ba nan da nan kafin ya cika ko da kwata.

A gaskiya ma, Gary malami ne mai kula da harkokin addini a Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon kuma bai taɓa yin iƙirarin zama farfesa ba - duk da cewa 'yan jarida marasa kulawa da gidajen yanar gizo sun ba shi lakabi da dama a cikin kuskure tsawon shekaru - gami da shafin da ya daina aiki a gidan yanar gizo wanda ke satar bayanai game da TEDx da yawa kuma yana bayyana masu magana ba tare da kulawa ba ba tare da tuntuɓar su ba. A ƙasa akwai hoton allo. Rubutun Prause don "tabbatar" cewa Gary Wilson ya ɓatar da bayanansa (kuma, shafin Gary Wilson ba ya wanzu). Lura: Har sai da Prause ta samar da "shaidarta," Gary bai taɓa ganin wannan shafin ba kuma bai taɓa yin magana da masu masaukin baki ba. Don haka bai taɓa bayar da tarihin rayuwa, ko iƙirarin "farfesa" a kansa ba. Gary ba ya neman yin magana kuma bai taɓa karɓar kuɗi don yin magana ba. Bugu da ƙari, YBOP ba ta karɓar talla ba, kuma kuɗin da aka samu daga littafin Gary Wilson yana zuwa ga wata ƙungiyar agaji mai rijista.

A shafin game da shafin yanar gizon Keynotes.org ya ce ba hukuma ba ce kuma kowa zai iya loda tarihin bidiyo da mai magana: Keynotes.org ba hukuma ba ce, a'a, shafin kafofin watsa labarai ne…. Ana samun bayanai daga TrendHunter.com, babban gidan yanar gizo na gano abubuwan da ke faruwa a duniya . Don haka, yana yiwuwa ma Prause ta loda tattaunawar Gary ta TEDx tare da wani tarihin rayuwarta da ba daidai ba don ƙirƙirar "shaidar" da take so ta ɓoye. Bayan shekaru 5 na ci gaba da cin zarafi da bin diddigin yanar gizo , takardu na bogi , maganganun batanci , ɗaruruwan tweets , da kuma sunayen masu amfani da yawa tare da ɗaruruwan sharhi , babu abin da zai ba mu mamaki.

Gary ya koyar a Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon sau biyu. Ba a taɓa "kore shi ba," kamar yadda za a iya gani daga takardun aiki da ke ƙasa da wannan sakin layi. Gary ya kuma koyar da ilimin halittar jiki, ilimin halittar jiki da kuma ilimin cututtuka a wasu makarantu da dama tsawon shekaru ashirin, kuma sashen ilimi na Oregon da California ya ba shi takardar shedar koyar da waɗannan fannoni (YBOP Game da mu shafi ). Gary bai taɓa cewa yana da digirin PhD ko kuma farfesa ba ne.

———————————————————————————————-

Da ke ƙasa akwai kwafin “wanda ba a sake yin gyara ba” na daftarin aiki An saka shi a shafukan yanar gizo da yawa. Prause ya yi da'awar yana nufin cewa an kori Gary ne, lokacin da a zahiri yake nufin "ƙare albashi" kamar yadda Gary ya yi murabus saboda matsalar gaggawa ta likita. Fassarar sigar ta sake gyara sashen COMMENTS, inda SOU ta bayyana cewa Gary yayi murabus saboda matsalar lafiya.

Ba zato ba tsammani, Gary ba ya karɓar diyya daga ƙungiyar agaji da kuɗin da ya samu daga littafinsa ya tafi. Matsayinsa na Jami'in Bincike na girmamawa ne (mai sa kai). Kuma ba ya aiki a Hukumar Ƙungiyar agajin ko kuma ya ƙayyade yadda za ta raba kuɗinta.

Yana fatan wata rana TED zai cire gargaɗin da ba shi da amfani da ya ce masu sukarsa (wanda Prause ke jagoranta) sun daɗe suna yin amfani da shi wajen yin jawabi mai farin jini na TEDx . Ba wai kawai akwai cikakken goyon baya ga "The Great Porn Experiment" (2012) ba, an buga ɗaruruwan ƙarin bincike tun daga 2012 waɗanda suka goyi bayan iƙirarin Gary Wilson gaba ɗaya. Waɗannan shafuka 2 suna ba da tallafin zamewa-zame ga TGPE:

Baya ga sanya takaddun aikin da aka sake gyara da kuma maganganun ɓatanci a shafin yanar gizon masana'antar batsa, Prause ta yi amfani da Quora da Twitter don yaɗa ƙarairayinta. A yin haka, an dakatar da Prause daga Quora, kuma an dakatar da shi ta Twitter. Duba waɗannan sassan biyu daga "Shafin shafi":

Gary kuma yana fatan Dr. Prause zai daina ɓata masa suna da kuma cin zarafinsa da wasu . Duk da cewa wannan sabon misali na ɓata masa suna (ƙaryar da ta yi na cewa an kori Gary) ba abin mamaki ba ne kamar ikirarinta na ɓata masa suna cewa tana da umarnin kotu na hana ta tuntuɓar Gary, amma hakan ba gaskiya ba ne.

Wataƙila lokaci ne na Dokta. Yi amfani da shi don girma da kuma kasancewa kamar kwararren da yake da'awar.

PS: Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon ta tabbatar da cewa Nicole Prause ita ce kaɗai ta nemi bayanan aikinsa. Imel ɗin da ke ƙasa:

Yi amfani da abokin tarayya na yau da kullun a cikin hargitsi, David Ley, ya kuma yi ƙarya cewa an kori Gary Wilson daga jami'ar Kudancin Oregon:

Wani leken kyauta na Ley, wanda yake inganta batun Mike Mike na Kudu (wanda aka share shi daga bisani):

Sabuntawa : Yanzu haka masana'antar batsa tana biyan David J. Ley don tallata shafukan yanar gizon su, yayin da yake musanta illolin batsa. Duba - Ci gaba - Yanzu haka kamfanin Xhamster na masana'antar batsa ya biya David J. Ley diyya don tallata shafukan yanar gizon sa da kuma shawo kan masu amfani da shi cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i tatsuniya ce.

Salisu tayi tinggi sau da yawa don inganta karfinta, ta danganta labarin ta na Quora.

Wani tweet, cike da ƙarya. Duba - Ci gaba - Sharhi ya yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa Wilson ya ɓatar da takardun shaidarsa

Twearin tweets masu ladabi ta hanyar Prause & Ley, suna haɗuwa da post ɗin Nikky tare da bayanan aikin SOU na Wilson:

FYI - Yi wasa da damuwa TED na tsawan shekaru 5… kuma sun bada kai. Amma duk abin da ke cikin maganar TEDX ana tallafawa sosai. Duba -

---------

Mayu, 2018: Wasu ƙawaye sun shiga cikin Prause & Ley a cikin ikirarin ɓata sunansu na cewa an kori Wilson daga SOU. Misali, Tammy Ellis ta wallafa waɗannan a lokacin harin yanar gizo da ita da Prause suka kai a shafin Facebook na Fight The New Drug (wanda aka rubuta a nan: Mayu 30, 2018: Prause ta zargi FTND da zamba ta kimiyya, kuma tana nuna cewa ta kai rahoton Gary ga FBI sau biyu ):

Ba wai kawai Tammy Johnson Ellis tana ƙarya game da korar Wilson ba, har ma tana ƙarya game da "sassan bincike na tsince ceri". A cikin duk ɗaruruwan rubuce-rubuce da tweets na bata suna Ley, Prause, Ellis, da abokansu ba su taɓa bayar da misali na "tsincen ceri" na Wilson ba (duba babban shafin bincike na YBOP don yanayin binciken na yanzu).

----------

Ci gaba zuwa 2019: Prause ta ci gaba da wallafa sakonnin batanci da ke ikirarin cewa an "kashe Wilson" daga SOU, ko kuma ya kasance mataimakiyar koyarwa a Jami'ar Souther Oregon. Bugu da ƙari, ta ci gaba da yin ƙarya game da Wilson yana ɓatar da takardun shaidarsa.

Tweet #1 - 2-25-19:

Ta sake yin wani abu a ranar Lahadi. Karya ta yin wani abu: Ba a dakatar da Wilson ba, kuma ba shi da TA (kamar yadda aka rubuta a wannan sashe). Wilson bai taɓa yin wani abu ba daidai ba game da takardar shaidarsa, kuma Prause bai taɓa yin wani abu ba daidai ba game da wannan: Ci gaba - Karya ta yi iƙirarin cewa Wilson ya yi kuskuren yin amfani da takardar shaidarsa. Sunan Prause ba ya cikin YBOP sau 82,000: Oktoba, 2018: Karya ta yi iƙirarin cewa sunanta ya bayyana sama da sau 35,000 (ko 82,0; ko 103,000; ko 108,000) akan YourBrainOnPorn.com

COPE ba ta taɓa neman janyewa ba. Duk abin da Prause ya faɗa game da takardar MDPI ƙarya ce - kamar yadda aka rubuta a waɗannan shafuka kuma a nan: Kokarin Prause na samun takardar bita ta Kimiyyar Halayya ( Park et al ., 2016) ya janye

----------

Afrilu 1, 2019: Prause da David Ley sun sake yin ƙarya game da aikin SOU na Gary Wilson

Bayani: A ranar 31 ga Maris, 2016, an buga labarin murfin TIME ("Batsa da Barazana ga Ƙwayar cuta"), na Belinda Luscombe, wanda ya ƙunshi Gabe Deem, Nicole Prause, David Ley, Gary Wilson, da sauransu da yawa. Shekara ɗaya kenan da aka fara shiryawa kuma TIME ta sami marubucin da sauran ma'aikatan TIME (masu duba gaskiya) suna bin diddigin iƙirarin da kowane mutum da aka yi hira da shi ya yi. Da zarar an buga Prause da sunan ta "PornHelps" sun kai hari da ɓatanci ga marubucin ta Belinda Luscombe:

A ranar 1 ga Afrilu, 2019, Gary Wilson da Belinda Luscombe sun yi tsokaci a wani dogon zaren twitter da ke tattauna ingancin Binciken Jama'a na Gabaɗaya (wanda ya yi iƙirarin cewa kashi 45% ne kawai na maza, masu shekaru 18-29, suka kalli fim mai ƙimar X a shekarar da ta gabata). Cikin 'yan mintuna kaɗan Prause ta shiga cikin salon kai hari da ɓata sunan Luscombe da Wilson (wanda ya daɗe yana goyon bayan Prause David Ley shi ma ya yi Allah wadai da Wilson). A cikin sakon Twitter na farko daga cikin 8, Prause ta maimaita irin wannan ƙaryar da aka rubuta a wannan shafin. Ta kuma kira Belinda 'yar jarida ta karya , mai yin zamba.

Tunda Prause ya toshe Belinda, Ley ya shiga "fassarar" (amma ya daina kai hare-haren Prause akan Belinda). Belinda ta amsa :

David Ley ya shiga cikin ƙarairayi guda biyu na kansa : Cewa Wilson ma'aikacin TA ne (mataimakin malami) kuma an kore shi daga aiki.

Gaskiya ba ta hana Ley ko Prause ci gaba da bikin ɓata sunansu na Twitter ba , suna kai hari ga Belinda Luscombe da Wilson.

Duk abin da zai faru:

Wilson ba ya sauka daga koleji.
Wilson ba tsoho ba ne a kan bashin ɗalibansa.
Wilson ba TA bane. Ya kasance 'Adjunct Faculty.' (Ta yaya Wilson zai zama TA idan baya halartar SOU a matsayin ɗalibi?)

Sabuntawa: Gary Wilson ya haɗa waɗannan abubuwan da suka faru a cikin takardar rantsuwa da aka shigar a cikin ƙarar batanci ta Alexander Rhodes akan Nicole Prause: Nuni na 11: takardar shaidar Gary Wilson (shafuka 123)

Maris 5, 2018 - An yi amfani da shi har abada daga Quora don ya kara da Gary Wilson

A ranar 3 ^ga Maris , 2018, Nicole Prause ta buga wani labari mai ɓatanci a kan Quora: https://www.quora.com/What-do-you-think-about-your-brain-on-porn-movement/answer/Nicole-Prause . A cikin rubutunta mai cike da ƙarya, Prause ta buga kwafin bayanan aikin Gary Wilson da aka gyara kuma da saninta, ta faɗi ƙarya cewa Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon ta kori Wilson. A ranar 3 ga Maris da 4 ga Maris, Prause ta buga wasu maganganu goma masu ɓatanci da rashin gaskiya game da Wilson da aikinsa, duk suna ɗauke da hanyar haɗi zuwa rubutunta na ɓatanci:

Wilson ya kai rahoton Prause ga Quora da Twitter saboda keta sharuɗɗan aiki da cin zarafi. Dukansu sun yi aiki bisa ga ƙorafin Wilson, inda suka cire takardar aikinsa da kuma fassarar ƙarya ta Prause game da shi. Tabbatar da cewa Quora ya yi aiki bisa ga ƙorafin Wilson (ba shine cin zarafi na farko da aka yi wa Gary Wilson ba):

-----------

Quora ya ci gaba da hana Nicole Prause don hargitsi:

Wannan PDF ya ƙunshi duk maganganun 19 Prause Quora wanda yake ƙasƙantawa da ɓata sunan Gary Wilson (gami da maganganun 10 a cikin lokacin 24-hr, wanda ya haifar da Quora ta hana Prause)

Banning bai daina Yin amfani ba. Wadannan asusun Quora na karya wadanda akayi amfani dasu domin bata sunan Wilson sune likley Prause sockpuppet asusun:

Maris 12, 2018 - An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Liberos Twitter don sanya bayanan sirri na Gary Wilson wanda ya keta dokokin Twitter

Gary Wilson ya ba da rahoton cin zarafin Prause. Amsar Twitter:

An dakatar da asusun twitter na kwana daya.

Lura: a watan Oktoba na 2015: An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Prause na asali har abada saboda cin zarafi . Ta karya dokokin Twitter ta hanyar (sau biyu) wallafa bayanan sirri na ɗaya daga cikin marubutan wannan takarda "Jinkircin Jijiyoyin Batsa na Intanet: Bita da Sabuntawa" (2015) , wanda ya yi suka ga nazarin EGG guda biyu masu shakku.

Aiki - Yi amfani da da'awar ƙarya cewa Gary Wilson ya ɓatar da takardun shaidarsa (tana yin hakan sau ɗari)

A cikin labaranta na batanci , tweets, da rubuce-rubucen Quora, Prause ta yi magana da gangan kuma ta yi ƙarya cewa na yi iƙirarin cewa ni "farfesa ne a fannin ilmin halitta" ko "masanin kimiyyar jijiyoyi". Ni malami ne na Adjunct a Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon kuma na koyar da ilimin halittar ɗan adam, ilimin halittar jiki da cututtukan jiki a wasu wurare. Duk da cewa 'yan jarida marasa kulawa da gidajen yanar gizo sun ba shi lakabi da dama a cikin kuskure tsawon shekaru (gami da shafin da ya daina aiki a gidan yanar gizo wanda ke satar bayanai game da masu magana da yawa ba tare da tuntuɓar su ba) koyaushe yana faɗin cewa yana koyar da ilimin halittar jiki da ilimin halittar jiki. Bai taɓa cewa yana da digirin digirgir ko kuma farfesa ba ne.

Da ke ƙasa akwai hoton Gwaji don “tabbatar” cewa Gary Wilson ya ɓata bayanansa (kuma, shafin Gary Wilson ya daina kasancewa). Lura: Har sai da Prause ta samar da "hujja", ban taɓa ganin wannan rukunin yanar gizon ba kuma ban taɓa sadarwa tare da masu masaukinsa ba, ban taɓa shigar da shafin da ake tambaya ba kuma ban taɓa cire shi ba. Ta haka ne hakika ban taɓa ba da labarin rayuwa ba, ko iƙirarin “farfesa.”

A shafin game da shafin yanar gizon Keynotes.org ya ce ba hukuma ba ce kuma kowa zai iya loda tarihin bidiyo da mai magana: Keynotes.org ba hukuma ba ce, a'a, shafin kafofin watsa labarai ne…. Ana samun bayanai daga TrendHunter.com, babban gidan yanar gizo na gano abubuwan da ke faruwa a duniya . Don haka, yana yiwuwa ma Prause ta loda tattaunawar Gary ta TEDx tare da wani tarihin rayuwarta da ba daidai ba don ƙirƙirar "shaidar" da take so ta ɓoye. Bayan shekaru 7 na ci gaba da cin zarafi da bin diddigin yanar gizo , takardu na bogi , maganganun batanci , ɗaruruwan tweets , da kuma sunayen masu amfani da yawa tare da ɗaruruwan sharhi , babu abin da zai ba mu mamaki.

Na koyar a Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon sau biyu. Gary ya kuma koyar da ilimin halittar jiki, ilimin halittar jiki da kuma ilimin cututtuka a wasu makarantu da dama tsawon shekaru ashirin, kuma sashen ilimi na Oregon da California ya ba shi takardar shedar koyar da waɗannan fannoni. Gary ba ya neman yin magana kuma bai taɓa karɓar kuɗi don yin magana ba. Bugu da ƙari, YBOP ba ta karɓar talla ba, kuma kuɗin da aka samu daga littafin Gary Wilson yana zuwa ga wata ƙungiyar agaji mai rijista.

Dukansu Prause & David Ley suna ci gaba da da'awar kai tsaye ko a kaikaice cewa na yi kuskuren gabatar da takardun shaidata. Tabbas, basu taɓa ba da misali guda ɗaya ba, amma gaskiya ba ta da mahimmanci ga waɗannan biyun. Misalan cin zarafin su ta yanar gizo:

A'a, "duniyar batsa ta tururuwa" ba ta cika da irin waɗannan mutane ba. Da yake magana game da man maciji, yanzu masana'antar batsa tana biyan David Ley don tallata gidajen yanar gizon su, yayin da yake musanta illolin batsa. Duba: Ci gaba - Yanzu haka David J. Ley yana samun diyya daga babban kamfanin masana'antar batsa Xhamster don tallata gidajen yanar gizon sa da kuma shawo kan masu amfani da shi cewa jarabar batsa da jarabar jima'i tatsuniya ne.

A kan kafofin yada labaran, Prause ta bayyana cewa ta dakatar da maganata saboda na gabatar da "takardun shaidar da ba a samu ba." Alal misali, Amsa yayi amfani da tweet game da batun ESSM, da kuma iƙirarin cewa Gary Wilson ba shi da shi saboda ya "ba da takardun shaidar ƙarya":

Shaidar cewa Prause yana ƙarya tana cikin wannan sashe: Tabbatar da cewa Prause ya yi wa masu shirya taron Ƙungiyar Magungunan Jima'i ta Turai ƙarya, wanda hakan ya sa ESSM ta soke jawabin Gary Wilson.

Ci gaba cikin 2019, Prause ya ci gaba da sanya tatsuniyoyi masu ɓata suna cewa an “dakatar da ni” daga SOU, ko kuma na kasance mai TA (mataimakin koyarwa) a Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon. Ari ga haka, ta ci gaba da yin karya game da ni ba da shaidar gaskiyata.

Tweet #1 - 2-25-19:

Mai bin diddigin mutane mai cike da damuwa ya sake kai hari…. a ranar Lahadi. Karya ta yin karya: Ba a kore ni ba, kuma ba ni da TA (kamar yadda aka rubuta a wannan sashe). Ban taɓa yin karya ta hanyar yin karya ta hanyar yin karya ba, kuma Prause bai taɓa kawo wata shaida ba game da wannan: Ci gaba - Karya ta yi ikirarin ƙarya cewa Wilson ya yi ƙarya ta hanyar yin ƙarya ta hanyar yin ƙarya

COPE ba ta taɓa neman janyewa ba. Duk abin da Prause ya faɗa game da takardar MDPI ƙarya ce - kamar yadda aka rubuta a waɗannan shafuka kuma a nan: Kokarin Prause na samun takardar bita ta Kimiyyar Halayya ( Park et al ., 2016) ya janye

Sunaye Gary Wilson a matsayin "The Cyberstalker" akan Quora. Daga karshe dai an dakatar da Prause daga Quora saboda cin mutuncin da ni. Abubuwan da aka gabatar game da ni suna ba da bayanin kaina ba gaskiya ba ne kuma an danganta su da shafin yanar gizo ne wanda babu shi, kuma mai yiwuwa Pradu ya kirkireshi:

Don ƙarin gani:

Wani tweet na Prause ya yi nuni da cewa an cire ni (ba tare da dandamali ba) daga taron ISSM saboda zargin gabatar da takardun shaidar karya. Kamar yadda aka rubuta a cikin wannan sashe (tare da imel tsakanin ISSM & Wilson) Prause yana ƙarya game da ni yana ɓatar da takardun shaidara: Fabrairu, 2019: Tabbatar da cewa Prause ya yi wa masu shirya taron Ƙungiyar Magungunan Jima'i ta Turai ƙarya, wanda ya sa ESSM ta soke jawabin Gary Wilson.

Wannan ya kawo mu ga shekarar 2019 da kuma labarin shekaru 4 na Prause yana ƙoƙarin kowace dabara don a janye wannan takarda: " Shin Batsa ta Intanet Tana Haifar da Matsalolin Jima'i? Bita tare da Rahotannin Asibiti " ( Park et al., 2016). Prause ta damu da takardar da kuma kai hari ga duk wata shaida ta matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa. An rubuta abubuwan da ta yi da yawa a wannan babban shafi: Kokarin Prause na samun takardar bita ta Kimiyyar Halayya ( Park et al ., 2016) ya janye.

-----------------

Yin amfani da sabon dabara tare da sabon asusun Twitter:

Agusta, 2019: Asusun Twitter na RealYourBrainOnPorn (wanda a bayyane yake an haɗa shi da gidan yanar gizon da ke cikin sunan Daniel Burgess ) ya buga tweets da yawa masu ɓata suna suna cewa na ɓatar da takardun shaidara. Kamar yadda yake a Prause, wannan asusun Twitter ya kasa haɗawa da duk wata shaida da na bayar (wani abin da ya ɓata cewa sun ƙirƙira da'awarsu). Madadin haka, RealYBOP ta jawo wani abu mai sauri: ta buga hoton binciken Google na YBOP , wanda ya dawo da wasu labaran kafofin watsa labarai da aka kwafa kuma aka buga akan YBOP da kuskure suna kwatanta ni a matsayin "farfesa" (wanda ban taɓa da'awar cewa ni ba ne).

A screenshot daga sama tweet. Bugu da ƙari, an sake buga labarin a kan YBOP, amma ba YBOP ne ya wallafa shi ba. Ba daidai ba yana nufin ni a matsayin "farfesa a matsayin adjunct" (maimakon "malamain adjunct"):

RealYBOP ta yi amfani da irin wannan binciken Google don kama URL ɗin YBOP, don ya bayyana kamar ina cewa ni farfesa ne. RealYBOP na iya kama URL ɗin YBOP saboda labarai 100 ko fiye da suka ambaci Gary Wilson da YBOP suna kan YBOP. Yawancin labaran YBOP suna nan: 'Kwakwalwarka Akan Batsa' a cikin Labarai . Ta amfani da kalmomi masu mahimmanci, binciken Google ya mayar da abu ɗaya da RealYBOP ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter. (A zahiri, kusan duk sakamakon binciken ya kasance game da ikirarin ƙarya na yi ƙarya game da takardun shaidara.)

[Haɗi zuwa labarin murfin TIME na 2016 akan YBOP: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/about/your-brain-on-porn-in-the-news/porn-and-the-threat-to-virility-time-2/ . Labarin iri ɗaya akan gidan yanar gizon TIME: https://time.com/4277510/porn-and-the-threat-to-virility/]

A cikin ɓangaren da TIME ta yi kuskuren kiran ni da "farfesa":

Matasan da suka ƙi kallon batsa suna da wani babban malami da ba za a iya mantawa da shi ba: Gary Wilson, mai shekaru 59, tsohon farfesa a fannin ilmin halitta na ɗan lokaci a Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon da makarantu daban-daban na sana'a kuma marubucin littafin Your Brain on Porn: Internet Pornography and the Emerging Science of Addiction. Shafin yanar gizon sa, yourbrainonporn.com, ko kuma YBOP, wani wuri ne na tattara bayanai da ke tallafawa alaƙar da ke tsakanin amfani da batsa mai yawa ga matasa da kuma rashin lafiyar jima'i. Mutane da yawa suna samunsa ta hanyar jawabinsa na TEDx na 2012, wanda ke da fiye da masu kallo miliyan 6.

Abubuwan da ke sama, da kuma labarin na biyu akan YBOP (Shin barin batsa zai inganta rayuwar ku?), Shin kawai hujjoji ne RealYBOP da Prause suna bayar da cewa nayi da'awar ni tsohon farfesa ne - duk da cewa kuskure ne na aikin jarida, ba nawa bane kwata-kwata. 'Yan jaridun sun maye gurbin "adjunct faculty" da "adjunct farfesa" (oh, abin tsoro!):

Bayan wannan jawabin, sai aka sake yin wani bidiyo mai zaman kansa na TEDx Talk a bara, wanda Gary Wilson, wani farfesa a fannin ilmin jikin dan adam a jami'ar Oregon ya gabatar.

Duk labaran sun sami kuskure. Ban taba yin iƙirari ga farfesa ko PhD ba. Na koyar da ilmin jikin dan adam da ilimin kimiyyar lissafi na tsawon shekaru, gami da wasu 'yan A&P labs a Kudancin Oregon University. Lokacin da aka tambaye ni game da lokacin da na yi a SOU, na bayyana a sarari cewa an sanya ni a matsayin "malamainiya," ba farfesa ba. A cikin shekaru 10 na bayar da tambayoyin, har yanzu ban ga ko da labarin daya isar da maganata daidai ba a cikin hira. A zahiri, labarai da yawa ba su da yawa kamar haɗuwa tare da kwafin-da-manna daga wasu rukunin yanar gizon, wanda babu makawa yana yaɗa kurakurai da gaskiya.

Tunda wannan ƙaramin kuskuren "tsohon farfesa mai aiki na ɗan lokaci" za a iya gano shi a labarin murfin mujallar TIME ta 2016 , bari mu duba abin da na aika wa editan TIME Belinda Luscombe ta imel.

Inda a cikin jerin sakonnin “adjunct faculty” ya rikide zuwa “farfesa adjunct” shine tunanin kowa. Amma a fili bai fito daga wurina ba.

Kamar yadda aka rubuta a wasu sassan ( 1 , 2 ), Prause da asusunta mai suna " PornHelps " a baya sun ci zarafin Belinda Luscombe kuma sun bata mata suna saboda jajircewarta wajen rubuta labarin murfin TIME akan ED da batsa ya haifar. A cikin wani zaren Twitter na 2019, Prause ta sake yin ikirarin cewa na yi kuskuren bayyana takardun shaidara ga TIME . Tunda Prause ya toshe Belinda, Ley ta shiga "fassarar" (amma ta cire hare-haren da Prause ya kai wa Belinda). Belinda ta amsa :

An duba gaskiyar lamarin TIME tare da Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon. Shin su ne suka fahimci hakan (dan kadan) ba daidai ba?

David Ley ya ci gaba da tattaunawa yana ƙara ƙarya guda biyu na kansa : (1) Ni mataimakiyar malami ce (taimakon malami), kuma (2) an kore ni daga aiki. Belinda Luscombe ta gyara masa magana:

Kamar yadda aka rubuta a nan, Prause da Ley suna yin batanci (shafin ya haɗa da wasiƙu daga lauyoyin SOU waɗanda ke nuna Prause & Ley a matsayin maƙaryaci): Nicole Prause & David Ley sun yi iƙirarin cewa an kori Gary Wilson daga Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon.

Agusta/Satumba, 2019: Realyourbrainonporn (Daniel Burgess? Nicole Prause?) cikin fushi yana cewa Gary Wilson ya yi kuskuren bayyana takardun shaidarsa. RealYBOP ma ta bi Belinda Luscomble - kamar Prause da sunan ta ( PornHelps ) galibi suna yi:

Wannan yana kan hanyar RealYBOP ta wallafa wani rubutu game da Gary Wilson sama da sau 100 a cikin kwanaki 3: Realyourbrainonporn (Daniel Burgess) ɓatanci/cin zarafin Gary Wilson: An "sami" URLs na batsa na karya a cikin Taskar Wayback ta Intanet (Agusta, 2019).

---------

Nuwamba, 2019 - RealYBOP: Mai bi “Abby” ba da gangan ya kira ni masanin kimiyya ba (Ingilishi ba asalin ƙasar Abby ba ne). Gwada / RealYBOP nan da nan ya hau kan wannan don sake yin ƙarya:

Lura cewa Yi amfani / RealYBOP ya tabbatar da cewa za a buga fallasa 'cikin watanni

Ina da isasshen ƙaryar Prause / RealYBOP, kuma na ba da amsa tare da tatsuniyoyi da yawa (har ma RealYBOP sun toshe ni). Misali, kadan daga cikin tatsuna na:

RealYBOP ya tafi kwayoyi, yana kirkirar zane-zane da yawa na bogi “yana nuna” cewa ina musgunawa shafinsu na twitter. RealYBOP ya gaza ambaton cewa ya yi tweeting sama da sau 300 a wurina, ko game da ni, kuma yana ƙoƙarin sata alamar kasuwanci ta. Ofaya daga cikin zane-zanen RealYBOP da'awar ƙarya na yi barazanar kai ƙara a cikin tweets 170 da aka buga a cikin watanni 12 da suka gabata:

A zahiri, kawai na yi barazanar shigar da kara ne a cikin wani tilon kafa (rubutun da aka yi niyya na RealYBOP na farko mai kare mutunci:

RealYBOP maƙaryaci ne na yau da kullun da mai ba da izini, wanda ke gab da jan shari'ar tarayya na 3.

Maris, Afrilu, Oktoba, 2018: Nicole Prause fayiloli mai ban tsoro DMCA takedown buƙatun a cikin ƙoƙarin ɓoye tashin hankali da ɓarna (duk an watsar)

Kamar yadda kake gani a cikin sassan 3 da suka gabata, Kayan aiki ya rubuta tarihin aikin injiniya a Jami'ar Southern Oregon a Twitter, Quora, da kuma shafin yanar gizon manya. A cikin wajanta na siffantawa, Yi magana da gangan da ƙarya cewa an kori Gary Wilson kuma ba a taba koya masa a Jami'ar Southern Oregon ba. Ba a kori Wilson ba kuma ya riga ya koya a SOU. Wadannan ketare sun haifar da nuna cewa an dakatar da shi daga Quora kuma an dakatar da shi daga Twitter, tare da gargadi. Wilson ya aika da shafin yanar gizon bidiyo (MikeSouth) a sanarwa na DMCA, wanda ya sa a shafe "labarin". (share url: http://mikesouth.com/scumbags/dr-nicole-prause-destroys-yourbrainonporn-dont-fall-22064/).

A cikin wani martani bayyananne game da nasarar da aka samu na wargaza shirinta na gaggawa, Prause ta shigar da buƙatarta ta farko ta cire DMCA ga mai masaukin baki na gidan yanar gizo a ranar 3/29/2018. Ga waɗanda ba su sani ba, DMCA tana nufin Dokar Haƙƙin mallaka ta Digital Millennium . Ana amfani da sanarwar cire DMCA don cire kayan haƙƙin mallaka daga gidan yanar gizo. Prause ta shigar da DMCA a matsayin hanyar da za a cire ko a lalata wannan shafin don a share ko a lalata cin zarafinta da ɓata mata suna. Prause tana da'awar cewa hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na tweets ɗinta kayan haƙƙin mallaka ne. Tweets gabaɗaya ba su da haƙƙin mallaka, kuma nata ba su da haƙƙin mallaka. Kowace rana dubban gidajen yanar gizo da masu amfani da Twitter marasa adadi suna buga hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na tweets. Wani ɓangare na ƙarar DMCA ta farko ta Prause:

Bayani na kayan da ke cike da kuma abin da kuke so ya cire ko katange kuma cikakke bayanai don ba da izini ga OSP ta gano kayan, misali, URL zuwa shafi na laifi;
URL: www.yourbrainonporn.com wanda ke dauke da 3,040 ya nuna mini. Misalai suna haɗe kuma sun hada da shafukan kamar: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/nicole-prauses-pdf-her-span-lab-website

Wani ɓangare na amsawar Gary Wilson ga aikace-aikacen saukar da DMCA na Prause:

Abin damuwa ne cewa Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa ita ce wadda aka zalunta a nan, domin na rubuta misalai da yawa na yadda ta ci zarafin kaina da wasu - ciki har da masu bincike, likitocin likita, masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali, masana ilimin halayyar ɗan adam, tsoffin abokan aikin UCLA, wata ƙungiyar agaji ta Burtaniya, maza a cikin murmurewa, editan mujallar TIME , furofesoshi da yawa, IITAP, SASH, Fight The New Drug, mujallar ilimi Behavioral Sciences, da shugaban mujallar ilimi CUREUS : https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/nicole-prauses-pdf-her-span-lab-website

Babu wanda ya bayyana yana bin diddigin Prause. Ita ce ke bin diddigin wasu kuma take cin zarafinsu. Yawancin nassoshin shafina game da Prause suna kan wannan dogon shafi wanda ke ɗauke da shekaru 5 na Prause tana cin zarafina da ɓata sunana da wasu.

Amma ga sauran wuraren da Sunan suna ya bayyana, YBOP ya ƙunshi kusan shafuka 10,000, kuma yana da tsabtace gida don kusan duk abin da ke haɗuwa da amfani da batsa na Intanet da tasirin sa akan mai amfani. Nicole Prause ta wallafa karatu da yawa game da amfani da batsa da kuma liwadi, kuma ta hanyar shigar da kanta, ƙwararriya ce "mai ba da gaskiya" game da jarabar batsa da matsalolin jima'i.

Binciken Google na " Nicole Prause" + batsa " ya dawo da shafuka kusan 11,000. Ta yi ambato a cikin ɗaruruwan labaran jarida game da amfani da batsa da jarabar batsa, ban da bincikenta da ya shafi amfani da batsa. Tana kan talabijin, rediyo, podcasts, da tashoshin YouTube tana da'awar cewa ta karyata jarabar batsa tare da wani bincike guda ɗaya (wanda aka soki sosai ). Don haka sunan Prause ba makawa ne a wani shafi kamar nawa, wanda ke aiki a matsayin cibiyar tattara bayanai don bincike da labarai da ke da alaƙa da tasirin batsa ta Intanet. YBOP kuma tana sukar wasu bincike masu tambaya kan batsa da batutuwa masu alaƙa. Waɗannan sukar ba na mutum ba ne, amma suna da mahimmanci.

Wannan buƙatar cire DMCA ita ce ta baya-bayan nan a cikin jerin abubuwan da suka faru na cin zarafi da Prause ta yi. Dr. Prause ta yi rubutu game da ni a shafin Twitter kusan sau 100, yayin da ban taɓa yin rubutu game da ita ba (banda gyara wasu daga cikin ƙaryarta). Prause ta yi amfani da sunayen masu amfani da yawa na bogi don yin tsokaci game da ni a dandalin murmurewa daga batsa https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/nicole-prauses-unethical-harassment-and-defamation-of-gary-wilson-others/). Prause ta ƙirƙiri shafin amazon AWS don yin batanci da cin zarafi a kaina da sauran mutane da yawa ( https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/PressRelease_DefamationBySenatorWeiler.txt ).

Na gode da hankalin ku.

Gary Wilson

Bayan 'yan lokutan da suka yi hira da Wilson, mai masaukin baki na gidan yanar gizon ya ba da shawarar, " cewa ku biyun za ku iya gano duk abin da ke faruwa a nan ". Gary Wilson ya amsa:

Dear ____

Na gode da sakonka. Dr. Prause riga yana da bayanin tuntuɓa na, wanda kuke maraba don sake ba ta. Duk da haka, ta bukaci kada in tuntube ta kai tsaye (ko da yake ban taɓa fara saduwa da ita) ba. Abin takaicin shine, saboda haka, ban tabbata ba yadda zai yiwu mu canza ra'ayoyin ko kuma cimma daidaituwa kamar yadda kuke ba da shawara.

Shafatafar yanar gizon muni ce ga labarai da suka danganci ikirarin game da tasirin porn. Tana fahimta, bisa la'akari da shawara na doka, cewa Tweets ba su da haƙƙin haƙƙin mallaka, kuma ba a kariya daga DMCA ba. Babu wasu hotunan da suka shafi Dokta. Yi amfani da cewa na san YBOP.

Dokar Dokar Dokar Prause da takaddama, kamar yadda Tweets ya rubuta, yana da muhimmanci ga kowa da kowa yana ƙoƙari ya fahimci siyasa a halin yanzu yana rinjayar binciken da bayar da rahoto game da tashoshin yanar gizo. Sabili da haka, ba tare da dalili dalili na cire su ba, suna bukatar su kasance a YBOP.

Na yi nadama cewa Dokta Prause yayi ƙoƙari ya sanya ku a cikin kokarin da ya saba da shi.

Gaisuwa mafi kyau,

Gary

Sabis ɗin tallatawa na YBOP ya amsa ta "rufe tikiti":

gaisuwa,

Na gode da sabuntawa kan wannan batun. Za mu wuce tare da adireshin imel ɗin ku na lamba. Ina fatan wannan zai haifar da sassauci don ku duka.

A wannan lokacin munyi la'akari da wannan batun Copyright Infringement. Na kafa wannan tikitin don rufewa ta atomatik a cikin 96 hours yayin da muke ci gaba da saka idanu don ƙarin karama.

Idan kana da wasu tambayoyi don Allah bari in san.

Ba don a firgita ba, Yi amfani da sabis ɗin DMCA Defender.com, wanda ya gabatar da buƙata na sake saukar da DMCA na biyu a kan Afrilu 17th, 2018. Har ila yau, Mai kare DMCA ya yi iƙirarin cewa hotunan hotunan tweets ko ta yaya haƙƙin mallaka ne. Ba su bayar da wata hukuma ba don tallafawa maganganun, amma sun ba da adireshin kowane sikirin. Gary Wilson, ya sake amsawa game da hargitsi na Prause:

Dear _______

Idan kuna buƙatar cikakkun bayanai don bayanan ku, na ga cewa mai cin zarafina, Nicole Prause, yanzu ta ɗauki hayar kamfani don taimaka mata a cikin buƙatun cire DMCA na bogi. Prause tana da'awar ƙarya cewa hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na tweets ɗinta da sharhin Facebook kayan haƙƙin mallaka ne. Kusan dukkan hotunan kariyar kwamfuta da kamfanin ke korafi a kansu ana iya samun su akan shafin YBOP wanda ke ɗauke da cin zarafin da Prause ya yi wa kaina da wasu - gami da masu bincike, likitocin likita, masu ilimin halayyar ɗan adam, tsoffin abokan aikin UCLA, wata ƙungiyar agaji ta Burtaniya, maza a cikin murmurewa, editan mujallar TIME , farfesoshi da yawa, IITAP, SASH, Fight The New Drug, mujallar ilimi Behavioral Sciences , da shugaban mujallar ilimi CUREUS . Duba - https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/nicole-prauses-pdf-her-span-lab-website

Kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin martani ga ƙoƙarin da aka yi na DMCA na Farko, shafin yanar gizonmu shine gidan tsabta don labarai da suka danganci ikirarin game da tasirin porn. Abinda na fahimta, bisa la'akari da shawara na doka, cewa Tweets ba su da haƙƙin mallaka, kuma ba a kariya daga DMCA ba. Tare da wannan buƙatar, Prause yana ƙoƙari ya cire shaidar ta damuwa, cyber-stalking da defamation. Sai dai idan dokar ta canza, dole ne hotunan kariya su kasance.

Wannan umarni na DMCA ya sauke ya zama sabon abu a cikin dogon lokaci na rikice-rikice. Dokta Prause ya zana kusan kusan 100 sau da yawa, yayin da ban taɓa tweet game da ita ba (wanin gyara wasu ƙaryarta). A hakikanin gaskiya, Harshen kisa ya kai mani hari a jiya jiya jiya.

Kuna yi amfani da wasu sunayen masu amfani da sunan karya don aikawa da labarin game da ni a kan batutuwan dawo da batsa

https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/nicole-prauses-pdf-her-span-lab-website#july2013

https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/relevant-research-and-articles-about-the-studies/critiques-of-questionable-debunking-propaganda-pieces/nicole-prauses-unethical-harassment-and-defamation-of-gary-wilson-others/

https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/nicole-prauses-pdf-her-span-lab-website#cbc

Prause ta ƙirƙiri (kuma ta haɗa shi da) shafin Amazon AWS don ɓata suna da cin zarafi a kaina da wasu mutane daban-daban: https://s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/weilerdefamation/PressRelease_DefamationBySenatorWeiler.txt . Prause yana da ƙarin shafuka 10 na Amazon game da ni - duk suna ɗauke da zarge-zargen ƙarya da kuma 'shaida' na bogi.

Kafin farkon yunkurin kwace DMCA na Prause, ta sanya bayanan aikina daga Jami'ar Kudancin Oregon a wurare da dama, ciki har da Twitter, Quora, da kuma wani gidan yanar gizo na masana'antar manya. Prause ta yi ikirarin cewa an kore ni daga aiki (ban yi ba), kuma ban taɓa koyarwa a SOU ba (na yi). Duk an bayyana su a nan :

Sakamakon haka shi ne an haramta wa Prause shiga Quora har abada, kuma an dakatar da shi na ɗan lokaci daga Twitter. Dangane da buƙatata, gidan yanar gizon masana'antar manya ( http://mikesouth.com/scumbags/dr-nicole-prause-destroys-yourbrainonporn-dont-fall-22064/ ) daga baya ya goge "labarin" na Prause mai ɓatanci. Wannan lamarin ya sa Prause ta yi ƙoƙarin yin buƙatunta guda biyu na cire DMCA.

Bugu da ƙari, na yi baƙin ciki cewa tana ɓata lokacinka a wannan hanya.

Gary Wilson

A ƙarshe mai masaukin baki na gidan yanar gizon Wilson ya rufe dukkan shari'o'in biyu, ba tare da samun wani amfani ba a cikin buƙatun cire DMCA na Prause. Lura: A lokaci guda kuma Prause tana ƙoƙarin cire DMCA na bogi, ta kuma goge ɗaruruwan sakonnin da ta yi ta hanyar cin zarafi, ɓata suna, ko cin zarafi ga mutane da ƙungiyoyi da yawa da aka ambata a wannan shafin.

GABATARWA: Oktoba, 2018 - Yi ƙoƙari ƙoƙari na saukar da DMCA na uku

A ranar 10 ga Oktoba, 2018 wani wakilin da ke wakiltar Nicole Prause ya gabatar da buƙatar saukar da DMCA na 3 tare da mai gidan yanar gizon na. Wakilin ya nemi a cire hotunan kariyar hoto da yawa na wasan kwaikwayon tweets daga wannan shafin. Da ke ƙasa akwai imel ɗin Gary Wilson ga mai masaukin yanar gizonsa

__________

Duk URL ɗin da aka jera hotunan kariyar kwamfuta ne na tweets na Nicole Prause, kuma ana iya samun su akan wannan shafin da aka ƙirƙira don magance cin zarafi da iƙirarin ƙarya da Nicole Prause ta yi: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/nicole-prauses-pdf-her-span-lab-website

Korafin na yanzu shine na wakilin Nicole Prause kuma an magance shi a baya. Duba wannan tikitin Linode daga watanni 6 da suka gabata: —————————————————–

Da fatan a sake ziyarci tikitin. Wannan shine ƙoƙarin na uku na Dokta Prause na neman tabbatar da takardun tweets daga shafin yanar gizon. Bayan da ta rubuta maka a karo na farko kuma ta kasa cimma nasararta, sai ta hayar da kamfani don yin bukatar. A yanzu, ta na da kamfani na biyu da ke ƙoƙarin kokarin DKCA.

Kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin tikitin Linode guda biyu da suka gabata, Nicole Prause ta kasance tana cin zarafin mutane da yawa, ciki har da ni, tsawon shekaru 6 da suka gabata. Dangane da cin zarafin da Dr. Prause ya yi, na ƙirƙiri shafi mai zuwa don yin kundin bayanai (da kuma musanta) maganganunta masu ɓatanci da kuma maganganun ƙarya: https://www.yourbrainonporn.com/nicole-prauses-pdf-her-span-lab-website

Shirin yanzu da Dokta Prause ya gabatar, ko kuma wakilinta, ya sake yin iƙirarin cewa DKCA ya rufe hotunan ta tweets. Kamar yadda aka bayyana 6 watanni da suka wuce, wannan fahimta ne, bisa ga shawara na doka, cewa tweets ba su da haƙƙin mallaka; kuma ba hotunan su suna kare ta DMCA. Dokar Dokar Dokar Prause da takaddama, kamar yadda takardunta suka rubuta, yana da muhimmanci ga duk wanda ke ƙoƙari ya fahimci siyasa a halin yanzu yana sukar binciken da bayar da rahoto game da labarun yanar gizo. Sabili da haka, ba tare da dalili dalili na cire su ba, suna bukatar su kasance a YBOP.

gaske,

Gary Wilson

A ƙarshe mai masaukin yanar gizon Wilson ya rufe wannan shari'ar ta 3, ba tare da samun cancanta a cikin buƙatun saukar da DMCA na wakilin ba.

Harshen siyasa ... an tsara shi ne don sa karya ya kasance mai gaskiya da kisan kai, kuma ya ba da alamar tsabta ga iska mai tsabta. ~ George Orwell

Malami na gaskiya zai kasance a shirye ya shiga tattaunawa ba tare da ya saba wa cin mutunci ko kuma ya danganta munanan manufofi ga ɗayan ɓangaren ba . ~ Dr. Debra Soh

Abubuwan Da Ya Dace

Labari: “Lokacin da Masana kimiyya ke Karya. "

Wannan labarin yayi daidai da abin da muka gani da kuma goguwa. An bayanan:

Sau da yawa mutanen da ke aikata zamba a kimiyya suna da babban rabo. Suna da fice a fannoni daban-daban na ilimi amma suna neman a ƙara musu daraja saboda fifikon gudummawar da suka bayar a fannin ilimi. Tare da sha'awarsu ta neman yabo, za a iya samun kwarjini da girma, da kuma sha'awar samun shahara. Yawan aikinsu na iya zama da alaƙa da hauka. Son kai nasu yakan haifar da ƙin yarda da rashin gaskiya da laifin ayyukansu. Littattafan Stapel da Obokata masu ba da hujja da kuma kare kai misalai ne na wannan lamari.

Idan aka yi suka ko aka nuna shakku game da aikinsu, waɗannan masana kimiyya galibi suna mayar da martani mai zafi. Suna iya barazana ga masu fallasa bayanai ko kuma ƙoƙarin kawar da alhakin ayyukansu ga wasu. Irin waɗannan shari'o'in na iya haifar da ƙalubale masu ɗorewa a kotu, kamar yadda masana kimiyyar da ake magana a kansu suka musanta duk wani nau'in rashin da'a.

Waɗannan masana kimiyya masu zamba galibi suna amfani da haɗin gwiwar wasu, ciki har da a cikin cibiyoyi, don ɓoye lamuran alhakin da kuma sanya wahalar gano wanda ya samar da takamaiman sassan bincike da kuma ko akwai izini mai kyau daga kwamitocin ɗabi'a masu dacewa…

Rashin bin ka'ida sau da yawa yana da abubuwa da yawa: yaudarar bayanai, satar kayan aiki da cin amanar aikin wasu. Ba kasafai mutane ke tsunduma cikin irin wannan halin ba kamar sau ɗaya kuma sau da yawa suna cikin nau'ikan nau'ikan irin wannan rashin gaskiya, har sai a ƙarshe aka fallasa su.

Wannan rashin gaskiya yana lalata abokan aiki, cibiyoyi, marasa lafiya waɗanda ke karɓar maganin da ake zargi, hanyoyin bincike da kuma amincewa da karatun.

Yana ƙalubalantar cibiyoyi saboda waɗanda ke da alhakin yaudarar ilimin kimiyya galibi taurari ne a cikin masaniyar masana da manyan masu karɓar kuɗaɗen bincike. Sun sanya cibiyoyi, shin sassan jami'a ne ko dakunan bincike na bincike, akan taswirar masana kuma suna ajiye su a wurin.

Bayyana rashin da'arsu yana haifar da haɗarin matsayin ɗaukacin ma'aikata da fa'idarsa ta kasuwanci. Ba abin mamaki bane kenan zargin da bayyana irin wannan ɗabi'ar rashin ladabi galibi ba a maraba da su, kuma sau da yawa ana jujjuya yanayin binciken a kan mai fallasa maimakon mai laifi.

Rashin ladabi na bincike galibi yana da mahimmanci yayin da ya kai ga bugawa. An bayyana lokuta da yawa na yaudarar bincike a cikin 'yan shekarun nan, wanda ya haifar da adadi mai yawa na janyewa a cikin manyan martaba da mujallu masu daraja.

Gaskiyar da ba za a iya misaltawa ba ita ce cewa rajista da daidaiton bita na takwarorinmu an nuna su a bayyane ba su da tasiri, kuma an juya ta kuma an kewaye ta. Muna buƙatar yin mafi kyau idan za mu rage girman abin da ke faruwa na binciken zamba.

Labari na biyu mai matukar dacewa:Laifin Badarancin Shawara Don Mummunan Kimiyya. ”

Masanin kimiyya ɗaya zai iya buga takardu, yana yin bita ga takardun wasu mutane, yana gabatar da tallafi, yana aiki a kwamitocin bita don tallafin wasu mutane, yana gyara mujallar aiki, yana neman aiki da kuma yin aiki a kwamitin ɗaukar ma'aikata - duk a lokaci guda. Don haka ƙa'idodin sahihancin kimiyya, don hanyoyin da suka dace, ba sa aiki tare da cibiyoyi ko masu ba da kuɗi ko mujallu. Waɗannan ƙa'idodin suna cikin masana kimiyya da kansu. Fursunoni da gaske suna gudanar da mafakar kimiyya.

Nazarin da ya dace: “Bukatar fim don wasan kwaikwayo” halaye ne na maladaptive.

Masana kimiyya sun fara bincikar halayen mutum wanda, "mutane cikin sauƙin sarrafa wasu daga matsayin da ake ganin cewa an yi masu rauni." Sun tabbatar da wasu abubuwa guda uku na "Bukatar fim" (NFD) wanda ya kunshi, "magudi tsakanin mutane, nuna halin ko-in-kula, da nuna alamun cin zarafi."

Bukatar bean wasan kwaikwayo (NFD) za a iya bayyana ta azaman halayyar ɗabi'a wacce mutane ke yin taurin kai wajen sarrafa wasu mutane daga matsayin da aka sani na cin zarafi. ...

Muna tsammanin mutanen da ke da NFD mafi girma za su raba wasu halaye tare da waɗanda ke nuna alamun BPD da na HPD, wato mai saukin kamuwa da rikice-rikicen mutane, halayyar magudi, yanke shawara cikin gaggawa, da kuma ganin yadda ake cin zarafin su. ...

Don ƙarin bayani, duba Frankowski, S., Lupo, AK, Smith, BA, Dane'El, M., Ramos, C., & Morera, OF (2016). “ Haɓakawa da Gwaji Ma'auni don Auna Bukatar Wasan Kwaikwayo .” Halaye da Bambancin Mutum ɗaya , 89, 192-201.

Tunani 2Abun Cutar da Nicole Prause ya yiwa Gary Wilson da sauransu (Shafi 1)"

Pingback: Shahararren Labarin Batsa Mai Binciken Fim Da'awar Batanci A Matsayin Tursasa Jima'i, Daidaita Takaddun Batanci Da Manufa Ta [UPDATED] - Mummunan Laifi
Pingback: Alex Rhodes na Supportungiyar Taimako na Yara Game da Yara 'Babu Fap' esararrakin Kulawa da Pro-Porn Sexologist for Defamation | Labarai da Siyasa

Comments an rufe.

- "Masanin Kimiyya na Gaskiya" a kan ko a kusa da Disamba 18th 2013 (CBC)