Nicole Prause ta Rashin ethabi'a da ethatancin Gary Wilson da Sauran (Shafi 4)

Gabatarwa (kamar yadda yake bayyana a Page #1)

Mashawarcin doka ya ba mu shawara don ƙirƙirar waɗannan shafuka, waɗanda ke da rubuce-rubuce game da yaƙin neman zaɓe na Nicole Prause wanda ke nufin waɗanda ke nuna yiwuwar cutar da batsa ko batutuwa a cikin masana'antar batsa. "Sunshine" yana kare al'umma Yi amfani da fitintinu ta hanyar adana hujjoji tare da bawa baƙi da 'yan jarida damar fahimtar gaskiya da kansu. Lallai, waɗannan shafukan an riga an ambata a cikin a karar cin mutunci akan Amincewa:

“Tarihin wanda ake kara ya kasance cikakke kuma ingantacce wanda yake dauke da asusun mutane da dama wadanda abin ya shafa tun daga shekarar 2013 zuwa yanzu, wanda ya kunshi sama da shafuka dubu biyu na takardu da shaidu, ana samu https://bit.ly/32KOa3q. "

Nicole Prause ta shiga cikin tarin da'awar ƙarya, ɓata suna, rahotannin mugunta, cin zarafi da aka yi niyya, ƙararraki marasa tushe, da barazanar ƙararraki. Waɗannan shafukan suna tattara dabarun ɓata sunanta da yawa, kodayake ba a haɗa da wasu abubuwan da suka faru ba saboda waɗanda ake nema suna jin tsoron ƙarin ramuwar gayya daga gare ta ( Shafi na 1 , Shafi na 2 , Shafi na 3 , Shafi na 4 , Shafi na 5, Shafi na 6 ).

Ni (Gary Wilson) wataƙila ni ce abin da ta fi so, amma ta kuma kai hari ga masu bincike, likitoci, masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali, masana halayyar ɗan adam, abokan aikinta tun daga ɗan lokacin da ta yi aiki a UCLA, wata ƙungiyar agaji ta Burtaniya, mazan da ke cikin murmurewa, editan mujallar TIME , farfesoshi da yawa, IITAP, SASH, Fight The New Drug, TraffickingHub, Exodus Cry, mujallar ilimi Behavioral Sciences , kamfanin iyaye na MDPI, likitocin sojojin ruwa na Amurka, shugaban mujallar ilimi CUREUS, da kuma mujallar Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity . Waɗannan abubuwan da suka faru an yi musu lakabi da "WANDA SUKE." An tsara su daidai bisa ga tsarin lokaci.

Dangane da ni, tun da farko ta yi iƙirarin cewa ni ne batun umarnin "babu hulɗa" . Ta fara zarge ni da yin leƙen asiri a shekarar 2013 lokacin da ita da David Ley suka fara kai hari ga gidan yanar gizona da rubutunsu na PT, " Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa - BA TSORO BA NE ." Lokacin da na ƙalubalanci wasu daga cikin iƙirarin ƙaryarsu , Prause ta yi ƙoƙarin tsoratar da ni don cire martanina ta hanyar zargin ni da yin leƙen asiri.

Tun daga wannan lokacin, ta saba da amfani da wannan zargi a kan mutane da yawa, wadanda aka kawata su da zarge-zargen karya na “barazanar mutuwa,” a fili don dakile nuna son zuciya da mummunan aiki. A takaice dai, labarinta na cin zarafin mutane ya ta'azzara tsawon shekaru kamar yadda ya zamar mata tsangwama.

A ƙarshen shekarar 2020, ba zato ba tsammani ta fara iƙirarin cewa an yi mata fyade a shekarar 2019, kuma ni ne ke da alhakin abin da ba a sani ba. Ta yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa na saka adireshinta a YBOP kuma hakan ya sa wani saurayi ya kama ta a kan titi da skateboard. Ba ta bayar da wata shaida ta gaskiya ba cewa na saka adireshinta na zahiri ko kuma an kama ta.

Abin mamaki shi ne cewa Prause ba ta damu da bayyana min ainihin adireshin gidanta ba lokacin da ta shigar da ƙarar fatara don guje wa biyan ni wasu kuɗin lauya na kimanin dala $40 bayan hukuncin SLAPP da kotu ta yanke min (duba "Abubuwan Shari'a" a ƙasa). Ta kasance da tabbacin cewa ba zan taɓa bayyana shi ba (kuma ba ni da sha'awar yin hakan) - wanda ke nuna yadda ikirarinta na cewa ina son sanya ta cikin haɗari. A gaskiya ma, a cikin shigar da ƙarar fatarar da ta shigar ta rantse cewa ta zauna a wannan adireshin fiye da shekaru 3. Duk da haka a lokaci guda ta yi iƙirarin (ƙarya) cewa ta ƙaura sau da yawa don guje wa masu bin diddiginta (babu su). Duk wani abu da zai haifar da tatsuniyar tsananta mata da aka ƙirƙira!

Kawai don fayyace gaskiya, ban taɓa ƙarfafa kowa ya ci zarafin Prause ba. Kuma ban ga wata shaida da ke nuna cewa wani da na sani ya ci zarafinta ko ya sanya ta cikin haɗari ba. Tana da dabi'ar bayar da "shaidar" da aka ƙirƙira wadda ba ta tabbatar da ikirarinta ba. Misali, tana ɗaukar rahotannin ƙarya da take bayarwa ga jami'an tsaro , wasiƙun C&D ɗinta suna zargin mutane da abubuwan da ba su yi ba, hotunanta marasa amfani, da maganganun da ba a rantse ba na ƙungiyarta a matsayin shaida, kodayake babu wanda ya bayar da shaida bisa ga gaskiya don tallafawa ikirarinta.

Ya kamata a lura cewa 'yar jaridar bincike ta Kanada Diana Davison wacce ta rubuta The Post Millennial ta fallasa a kan Prause , ta yi magana da ita a kan rikodin na tsawon kusan mako guda. A cikin sharhin jama'a a ƙarƙashin wani bidiyo mai alaƙa Davison ta yi sharhi , " Pruse ta faɗi abubuwa da yawa a gare ni amma babu ɗaya daga cikin "shaidarta" da ya goyi bayan ikirarinta. A kowane hali, shaidar ta juya wa wanda ya yi mata zaluncin. Tana zargin wasu da ainihin abubuwan da ita da kanta ta yi. Na yi mata imel, a kan rikodin, na kusan mako guda ." A cikin sharhi na biyu Davison ta ce , " Lokacin da na ce na yi makonni biyu ina bincike wannan yana nufin na karanta kowace takarda a kotu da kowace takarda mai alaƙa kuma na yi mako guda ina aika imel tare da Prause da kanta wacce ta katse ni bayan na fara neman ainihin shaidar cin zarafi. " Prause ta amsa ta hanyar barazanar kai ƙarar Davison da The Post Millennial , kodayake ba ta bi ta ba.

Batutuwan doka

Duk da cewa Prause da abokan hulɗarta suna aiki tuƙuru don su nuna ta a matsayin wanda aka zalunta, a zahiri ita ce mai cin zarafi , a shafukan sada zumunta da kuma a harkokin shari'a . A kotu, wannan bai yi mata kyau ba. Wannan shafin yana ɗauke da nasarori daban-daban na shari'a akan Prause , waɗanda biyu daga cikinsu suka shafe ni. Zan taƙaita su.

A farkon shekarar 2020, Prause ta yi ƙoƙarin ƙarfafa kamfen ɗinta na cin zarafi da kanta ta hanyar shigar da buƙatar hana ni yin magana ba tare da wani dalili ba. A cikin takardunta na ƙarya, Prause ta yi ta ɓata sunan ɗana da kuma yi masa ba'a . Kotun ta ƙi amincewa da buƙatarta a watan Agusta, 2020. Alkali ya kuma amince da buƙatar SLAPP dina (“Ƙarar Dabaru Kan Shiga Harkokin Jama'a”). Wannan yana nufin ya yanke shawarar cewa shari'ar da Prause ta yi ba bisa ƙa'ida ba yunƙuri ne na danne haƙƙin faɗin albarkacin baki na.

A takaice dai, ba a iya tabbatar da ikirarinta na wanda aka zalunta ba. A gaskiya ma, a zaman sauraron karar, an yi watsi da mafi yawan shaidunta a matsayin "jita-jita," "kammalawa," "ba su da mahimmanci" da sauransu. Mako guda kafin zaman sauraron karar, Prause ta yi ta shelanta karya a shafin Twitter cewa tana da "umarnin kariya" a kaina , wanda hakan ya sa mabiyanta da suka fusata su yi min cin zarafi. Jim kadan kafin zaman sauraron karar, lauyanta ya yi kokarin yin murabus saboda ta yi masa barazanar kai shi kara kotu idan bai aikata wani abu da bai dace ba. Sanarwar manema labarai

Na gaba, ta shigar da ƙarar ɓata suna a kaina a Oregon. A watan Janairu, 2021, kotu ta gano cewa Prause ba ta gabatar da ƙararta ba, kuma ta ba ni kuɗi da tarar (wanda Prause ta ƙi biya). Sanarwar manema labarai.

Abin mamaki, Prause ba ta biya ɗayan hukunce-hukuncen da na yi nasara ba. Madadin haka, ta zaɓi kamfen na ɓata suna da barazana a bainar jama'a - kamar ni ne mai laifin maimakon kanta. Ta kuma musanta cewa ta sha kashi a ɗayan shari'o'in shari'ar da ke sama. Abin mamaki.

A gefe guda kuma, a farkon shekarar 2019, Prause ta shigar da ƙarar ƙarya ga hukumomin Alamar Ciniki ta Amurka lokacin da ta nemi kwace alamun kasuwanci na na gama gari , tana mai da'awar cewa ba ta san wanda ke da haƙƙin amfani da URL ɗina da alamun kasuwanci na ba. Ta wannan dabarar, ta nemi samun haƙƙin doka na musamman ga URL ɗina da aka tabbatar. Wannan ƙoƙari ne na bayyananne don yin bincike a kan dukkan shafina. Cikakkun bayanai . Babu shakka, ba shi da kyau a nuna Prause a matsayin wanda aka zalunta, idan aka yi la'akari da mummunan kamfen kamar wannan.

Bayan sa'o'i da yawa na lokacin lauya, na sami rajistar alamar kasuwanci ta ta asali da kuma URL ɗin da ke da alaƙa da keta haƙƙin mallaka, RealYourBrainOnPorn.com . A halin yanzu, asusun Twitter mai alaƙa @BrainOnPorn ya gudanar da ta'addanci na tsawon watanni 18. @BrainOnPorn ya yi amfani da muryarsa ta "ta gama gari" don yin tweet fiye da maganganun ɓatanci da mugunta 1,000 (har zuwa tweets 170 a rana!) game da duk wanda Prause bai yarda da shi ba. Prause ta musanta hannu, amma lura mai sauƙi, wasiƙu daga ma'aikatan RealYBOP, rahoton WIPO, da manyan shaidu sun nuna yadda take gudanar da asusun kafofin watsa labarun RealYBOP da URL (shaida a nan ).

Wasu ɓangarori uku daban-daban sun shigar da ƙarar batanci ga Prause saboda kamfen ɗinta na rashin gaskiya da ɓata rai: Donald L. Hilton, Jr. v. Nicole Prause, et al. , Kotun Gundumar Amurka ta Yankin Yamma na Texas Sashen San Antonio, Shari'a Mai Lamba 5: 19-CV-00755-OLG; Alexander Rhodes v. Nicole Prause, et al. , Kotun Gundumar Amurka ta Yankin Yamma na Pennsylvania, Shari'a Mai Lamba 2:19-cv-01366, da Aaron M. Minc, Esq v. Melissa A. Farmer da Nicole R. Prause , Lambar Shari'a: CV-20-937026 a Gundumar Cuyahoga, Ohio. (Da alama Farmer ta amince da yarjejeniyar, wadda za ta bar Prause a matsayin wadda ake tuhuma kawai. Babu shakka yarjejeniyar ta shafi biyan kuɗi daga kamfanin inshorar Farmer. A cikin wata takardar rantsuwa mai kwanan wata 8 ga Afrilu, 2021, Farmer ta amince da laifinta wajen sake wallafa ƙaryar Prause [ PDF na janyewa ] Prause ta bayyana cewa kamfanin inshorar nata ya ƙi rufe ta saboda ƙarar da Minc ta shigar a kanta, don haka za a iya barin ta kai tsaye da alhakin duk wani koma-baya na kuɗi a cikin wannan ƙarar. Har yanzu tana bin Wilson bashin dangane da nasarar da ya samu a kanta.)

Shari'o'i biyu na farko sun warware a farkon 2021. Duk da cewa ba a bayyana sharuɗɗan ba, yana da kyau a yi hasashen cewa an sami damar cimma matsaya ta hanyar biyan kuɗi mai yawa daga kamfanin inshorar Prause ( takardun kotu sun nuna cewa an tura kuɗi ga masu ƙara). Shari'ar ƙarar ɓata suna ta uku kuma ta baya-bayan nan tana ci gaba da gudana a Ohio. A wannan yanayin, wani abokin aikin Prause wanda ya sake buga sakonnin batanci na Prause ya kasance wanda ake tuhuma tare kuma abin baƙin ciki ya fuskanci alhaki saboda shiga cikin wannan aika-aika ba tare da sani ba.

Ya kamata a lura cewa Prause kanta tana da tarihin ƙara girma a matsayin mai ƙara mai tayar da hankali. A cikin shekarar da ta gabata ko makamancin haka, ta shigar da ƙarar ƙarar ƙara sama da rabin dozin , kuma, kafin hakan, kimanin rahotannin mugunta 40 a kan mutane da ƙungiyoyi da dama (duk da haka, Prause ba ta taɓa yin nasara a kowace ƙara ba kuma an yi watsi da duk rahotannin ƙaryarta). Prause tana da dogon tarihi na ƙoƙarin yin shiru da kuma ɓata wa duk wanda ba ta yarda da shi ba ta hanyar ƙirƙira iƙirarin cewa ta ci zarafin wani.

Yawancin dakatarwar kafofin watsa labarun

A watan Oktoba, 2015, asusun Twitter na Prause na asali @NicolePrause an dakatar da shi har abada saboda rashin da'a.

A watan Maris, 2018, an haramta asusun Prause's Quora saboda wallafawa da kuma yin ba daidai ba, bayanan sirri.

A watan Oktoba, 2020, an dakatar da asusun Twitter na @BrainOnPorn, wanda da alama Prause ta yi nasara, har abada saboda cin zarafi da cin zarafi da aka yi niyya.

A watan Maris, 2021, an dakatar da asusun Twitter na biyu na kanta, @NicoleRPrause na ɗan lokaci saboda yin "barazana mai ƙarfi."

Ina zargin cewa Prause tana bayan wasu asusun Twitter guda biyu da suka ɓace: @CorrectingWils1 da asusunta na farko na masana'antar batsa @PornHelps.

Hanyoyin watsa labarai da sauransu sun lalace ta hanyar ƙaryar Prause

Kafafen watsa labarai na Burtaniya Scram News sun daina aiki bayan sun biya diyya mai yawa saboda sun buga ƙaryar batanci ta Prause . Na ji cewa VICE ta fuskanci irin wannan ikirarin batanci kuma dole ne ta cire bayanan karya da Prause ta ba ta , wanda hakan ya jawo mata manyan kuɗaɗen shari'a. Na san da kaina cewa mujallar MEL ta gabatar da jerin labarai game da zargin da ake mata na cewa ita ce wacce aka zalunta. Duk da haka, bayan ƙarin bincike, MEL ta ƙi buga ƙaryar Prause - kuma mujallar ba da daɗewa ba ta dakatar da buga ta gaba ɗaya. Da fuskantar shari'a, jaridar Daily Beast ta janye zarge-zargen da Prause ta yi wa wasu mutane. A ƙarshe, an tilasta wa jaridar ɗalibai ta Jami'ar Wisconsin-Lacrosse cire wani labarin "bincike" wanda ke ɗauke da ƙaryar Dr. Prause game da ni (babban lauyan U na W yana da hannu).

Yi amfani da dangantaka mai dadi tare da masana'antar batsa

Bari mu fara da ma'anar “shill”:

Shill… mutum ne wanda yake ba da taimako ga jama'a ko ba da gaskiya ga mutum ko ƙungiya ba tare da bayyana cewa suna da kusanci da mutumin ko ƙungiyar ba. May Masu sayarwa da kamfen talla na ƙwararru zasu iya amfani da shills.

Idan aka yi la'akari da ma'anar da ke sama, a yi la'akari da waɗannan misalai da yawa . Kalmomin yabo suna da alaƙa da batsa , suna nuna tunani ɗaya tilo wanda yake abin mamaki ga masanin kimiyya, ganin cewa masana kimiyya galibi suna kare rashin son kai.

Asusun Twitter guda uku - asusunta na @NicoleRPrause da kuma asusun @BrainOnPorn da aka dakatar ( na biyu daga cikinsu da Prause ta bayyana sun yi nasara) - suna tallafawa, ko tallafawa, masana'antar batsa akai-akai kuma suna kai hari ga masu sukarta.

Da alama Prause ta ƙirƙiri fiye da sockpuppets na Wikipedia 50 (zuwa yanzu) don ƙarfafa sha'awar masana'antar da kuma ɓata wa masu suka suna da gyara na ɓatarwa, tare da wasu sunayen laƙabi da dama da take amfani da su don sakawa a dandalin tattaunawa kan dawo da batsa.

Shekaru kaɗan da suka wuce, Prause tana tallata alaƙarta da masana'antar batsa, ciki har da yin aiki a hukumar gudanarwa ta ƙungiyar masu shirya fina-finan batsa (APAG) da hotunan halartarta a taron masana'antar batsa da na cikin gida . Yanzu, tana ƙoƙarin tsoratar da wasu kada su ambaci ɗaya daga cikin waɗannan abubuwan da ba su dace ba saboda ta yanke shawarar cewa za su cutar da hotonta.

A takaice dai, ba a fayyace dalilin da ya sa duk wani ɗan jarida (wanda ba ya son masana'antar batsa) zai ɗauki Prause a matsayin tushe mai inganci ba. 'Yan jarida suna da alhakin masu karatu su girmama sakamakon alkalai da sauran sakamakon shari'a, kuma kada su bar masu karatu da tunanin cewa gaskiyar zargin Prause za a iya kama ta ko kuma cewa ikirarinta na ɓata suna da inganci. Bayan ta sha kashi a kotu , sau da yawa tana ƙoƙarin sake rubuta tarihi a cikin jaridu da kuma a Wikipedia tare da taimakon editocin da ba su da son kai.

Zai iya zama da wahala ga waɗanda take ɗauka su tantance gaskiya daga labaran ƙarya saboda ikirarinta suna da “mai daɗi” kuma “shaidun” da aka ƙirƙira sun yi yawa. Duk da haka, kamar yadda sakamakona a kotu ya nuna , na tattara takardu da yawa kuma zan iya musanta ikirarinta, idan aka tambaye ni.

Ba duk wanda yake iƙirarin cewa an zalunce shi ba. Wasu suna kawai kokarin ƙoƙarin yin amfani da mutuncinsu na jama'a ko don ɓata suna kuma "ba dandamali" (yin shiru) ga duk wanda ba su yarda da shi ba. Yi tunanin Trump. 'Yan jaridu za su so yin tunani sosai kafin su ba wa Farfajiyar dandamali da za ta haɓaka ƙaryar ta da ɓatanci.

Cikakken Tabarau na Nasihu (duka shafuka 5)

Yi amfani da Shafi # 1

Yi amfani da Shafi # 2

Yi amfani da Shafi # 3

Yi amfani da Shafi # 4

Yi amfani da Shafi # 5

Yi amfani da Shafi # 6

Wasu - Yuli, 2020: RealYourBrainOnPorn (Prause) suna zargin Gabe Deem da yin aiki tare da ƙungiyoyin da ke barazanar kashewa da yi mana fyade “mu”. Wannan bata suna ne da se. (ɓangaren yana ƙunshe da ƙarin lokuta na lalata-cyberstalking ta Yin amfani)

RealYBOP (@BrainOnPorn) ta ci gaba da yin katsalandan a shafukan yanar gizo game da Gabe Deem, tana mai ikirarin cewa yana aiki da ƙungiyoyin da ke aikata laifuka. Wani mummunan rubutu na batanci :

Shin hakan zai haifar da wata ƙararrakin ƙara?

Ƙarin binciken Deem ta yanar gizo. Kuma, ƙarya game da binciken 2007, kamar yadda aka fallasa a nan: Sukar da'awar da ke kewaye da "Martani ga Jima'i da Tasirin Yanayi mara kyau akan Sha'awar Jima'i a cikin Maza Masu Jima'i da ke Yin Jima'i da Maza" (2020)

Cigaba da ci gaba da karyatawa:

RealYBOP ba ta yi ƙarya ba. A zahiri, muhawarar ta ƙare akan PIED yayin da bincike 7 suka ba da rahoton maza suna murmurewa daga PIED ta hanyar daina batsa: Wannan jerin ya ƙunshi sama da bincike 40 da ke haɗa amfani da batsa/jarabar batsa ga matsalolin jima'i da ƙarancin sha'awa ga abubuwan da ke motsa sha'awa . Nazarin farko guda 7 a cikin jerin sun nuna dalili , yayin da mahalarta suka kawar da amfani da batsa kuma suka warkar da matsalolin jima'i na yau da kullun.

Ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo: Hanyar haɗi a tweet ba KYAU bane game da canje-canje na kwakwalwa, waɗanda kawai aikin kwakwalwa ne na yau da kullun. Bayani ba daidai ba:

Daga baya a wannan ranar ta tatsar bayanan sirrinta da rashin gaskiya game da karatun shekara 10, wanda bai tambaya game da amfani da batsa:

--------

Defarin ɓarna da haɓakar Gabe Deem:

FYI - Gabe ya tafi kwaleji, don haka yana iya kai ƙara RealYBOP don ɓata suna.

A rana guda, yin Tweeting a cikin zaren Gabe (RealYBOP ya toshe Gabe). RealYBOP bata tanka mata komai ba face labarin matsakaici wanda yake niyyata:

Kar ka fadawa RealYBOP, wanda ake zarginsa da laifin bata masa suna da wasu mutane biyu da ka zarge shi da yi da cin zarafin mata. Wannan shine ku:

Duba kuma - ƙage-ƙirƙirar Nicole Prause na cewa an fallasa wanda aka zalunta a matsayin wanda ba shi da tushe: ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka zalunta ba.

------------

A kwana ^na 7 a jere, RealYBOP ta ɗauki hoton wani rubutu na Gabe Deem a shafin Twitter , tana ɓata masa suna da kuma ɓata masa suna. A wannan karon ta nemi Don Hilton, likita yana ƙarar ta kan laifin ɓata mata suna . Wannan zai yi kyau ga alkali.

—————————————————————

updates:

Sauran - Yuli, 2020: RealYBOP (Faɗakarwa) ya zargi Staci Sprout da faɗin cewa masu binciken RealYourBrainOnPorn sun wulaƙanta yara

TWEET#1: Gaskiya YBOP ta ƙarya ne lokacin da ta yi iƙirarin cewa Sprout ta ce masu bincike suna lalata da yara. A zahiri, Staci tana tattaunawa ne game da Tebur na 34 na rahoton Kinsey na 1948, wanda ya ƙunshi bayanai da aka tattara daga masu lalata da yara waɗanda ke cin zarafin yara ta hanyar jima'i.

MA'ANA: Sprout yana nufin kawai gaskiyar cewa Alfred Kinsey ya yi aiki tare da masu lalata da yara don samar da littattafansa na tarihi na 1948 da 1952 kan jima'i na ɗan adam. Musamman, an rubuta waɗannan bayanan a cikin Tebur 34 na wannan littafin da Cibiyar Kinsey ta buga. A cikin Tebur 34, masu lalata da yara sun yi amfani da agogon tsayawa don yin lokacin abin da suke kira inzali ga yara ƙanana tun daga 'yan watanni zuwa farkon matasa.

Wannan ba shi da jayayya, kamar yadda Tebur na 34 daga shahararren rubutun Kinsey mai suna Sexual Behavior in the Human Name (1948) ya bayyana a sarari. Duba wannan labarin Washington Post daga 1995: KINSEY REPORT, SAURI DA SAURI? da wannan bidiyon.

Tebur na 34 - Tatsuniya a ƙarƙashin teburin ta ce, 'an yi ta ne da hannu na biyu ko agogon tsayawa'

Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa Prause ya kuma ɓata wa tattaunawar Don Hilton game da Tebur 34 suna, yana ƙirƙiro labarin da Hilton ya kira ta mai lalata yara, kawai saboda ya tambaye ta game da Tebur 34. Don Hilton ya amsa a cikin 2016 ga ƙaryar Prause a nan: Prause ya zargi Donald Hilton, MD da ƙarya . Daga nan ta yi amfani da ƙirƙiro ta don ba da hujjar shigar da rahotannin mugunta ga jami'arsa da Hukumar Lafiya ta Texas, wanda ya haifar da ƙarar da Hilton ya kai Prause ƙara saboda ɓata suna . Yanzu muna da Prause (RealYBOP) yana ƙoƙarin yin irin wannan dabarar tare da Staci Sprout.

An ɗauko daga wannan labarin da ke magana a kan Tebur 34:

A cikin littafin "Halayyar Jima'i a cikin Namijin Mutum" (wanda aka sake bugawa a shekarar 1998 kuma yana samuwa sosai), Cibiyar ta buga Tebur 34 mai suna "Jawabi mai ban tsoro", wanda ke tattara "martani game da jima'i" na yara daga jarirai har zuwa matasa kamar yadda manyan maza suka rubuta. Waɗannan masu lalata da yara sun gudanar da gwaje-gwajen jima'i a kan ɗaruruwan yara ta hanyar kawo su ga abin da masu gwajin suka kira "orgasm" (kururuwa, kuka, yaƙi da "abokin tarayya" na jima'i) da kuma tsara waɗannan amsoshin da agogon tsayawa.

John Bancroft, MD, tsohon darektan Cibiyar Kinsey, a cikin takarda, "Alfred Kinsey da Siyasa na Bincike na Ilimin Jima'i" ya ce Alfred Kinsey ya kasance, "yana da matukar sha'awar lura da manya da suka yi jima'i da kananan yara." Kin da hankalin Kinsey ne tare da rikicewar jima'i na yara wanda ya haifar da buga littafin mara kyau na 34 a cikin Fasali na 5 na Halayyar Aikin Jima'i a cikin Humanan Adam, wanda ke tattara bayanan lalata da yara ɗari.

Kinsey ya yi alfahari da cewa, "Yanzu mun ba da rahoton lura da irin abubuwan da suka shafi yin jima'i musamman kamar kaciya, amai, da kuma wasu halaye na fitsari na gaske a cikin jerin yara maza 317 wadanda suka fara daga masu shekaru biyar da haihuwa." Tebur 34 a cikin littafin Kinsey ya qunshi waxannan bayanan: wani jariri dan wata 11 ya sha fuskantar zargin da ya nuna “farji” sau goma cikin sa'a guda; Yaro dan shekara hudu da yaro dan shekara 13 sun sami irin wannan zargin a cikin awanni 26.

Shin Dr. Prause ya bayyana yana kare ayyukan Alfred Kinsey?

TWEET #2: Kuma, Staci Sprout tana nufin Tebur na 34 ne kawai na rahoton Kinsey. Duk da haka RealYBOP ta yi kuskuren fassara sakon Twitter na Staci, tana mai cewa tana nufin "ƙwararrun" RealYBOP.

TAFIYA # 3: Har yanzu, Staci Sprout yana kan magana ne kawai ga Table 34 da Alfred Kinsey, ba karar da Reisman ya gabatar ba:

Kawai ƙarshen RealYBOP/Prause iceberg na ɓata suna - duba wannan shafin yana tattara bayanan ɓarnar da RealYBOP ke ci gaba da yi wa Staci Sprout: CIN ZARAFI, CIN ZARAFI DA CIN ZARAFI DAGA MAHANGAR DA BA A TSAMMANIN TA A MATSAYIN MAI KIRA DA MUTUMIN DA YA YI JAGORA A MATSAYIN MAI KIRA DA MUTUMIN DA YA YI JAGORA A MATSAYIN MAI KIRA DA MUTUMIN DA YA YI JAGORA A MATSAYIN

updates:

Sauran - Yuli, 2020: @BrainOnPorn (Prause) ya bukaci mabiyan su kai rahoton Staci Sprout ga Nationalungiyar ofungiyar Ma'aikata da ofasar Washington (ta hanyar sanya lambar lasisin Staci ta haramtacciyar hanya)

RealYBOP (Prause) tana cin zarafi da ɓata sunan Staci Sprout, duk da haka. Prause ta ruwaito Sprout sau 3 a baya. An yi watsi da duk a matsayin marasa tushe: Janairu 24, 2018: Prause ta shigar da ƙararraki marasa tushe ga Washington State game da mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali Sprout.

Ka tuna cewa waɗannan tweets na RealYBOP ɗin ba su ƙunshe da komai face ƙarya. Na samar da hanyoyin domin ku gani da kanku cewa da'awar RealYBOP bai dace da hotunan kariyar da take sanyawa ba.

TWEET #1 : Kamar yadda kuke gani, babu ɗaya daga cikin abin da RealYBOP ta yi iƙirarin cewa yana cikin hotunan kariyar kwamfuta (tambayoyin RealYBOP sun ƙunshi ɓata suna da kanta, saboda RealYBOP tana zargin Sprout da laifukan gaske).

Kamar yadda aka bayyana a sama, Sprout kawai ya yi iƙirarin cewa Cibiyar Kinsey ta tattara bayanai daga masu lalata da yara. Wannan ba shi da jayayya kamar yadda Tebur 34 daga sanannen rubutunsa na Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948) ya bayyana a sarari. Duba labarin Washington Post daga 1995: KINSEY REPORT, FAST AND LOSSE? da wannan bidiyon . Prause ya kuma yi kuskuren siffanta ambaton Hilton na Tebur 34 a matsayin "kira ta mai lalata da yara." A cikin 2016, Hilton ya mayar da martani ga ƙaryar Prause a nan: Prause ya zargi Donald Hilton, MD da ƙarya . Daga nan ta yi amfani da ƙirƙiro ta don ba da hujjar shigar da rahotannin mugunta tare da jami'arsa da Hukumar Lafiya ta Texas. Wannan ya haifar da ƙarar Prause da laifin ɓata suna . Yanzu muna da RealYBOP/Prause yana jawo irin wannan dabarar tare da Staci Sprout.

TWEET #2 : RealYBOP ta saka lambar lasisin Staci, tana kira ga mabiyanta da su gabatar da rahotannin karya:

TWEET #3 : Tarin ƙarya marasa tushe. Takardun Twitter guda biyu na Staci Sprout da RealYBOP ta wallafa daidai ne kuma ba ta ambaci wani mutum ko na RealYBOP ba. Sauran tweets guda biyu ba su da alaƙa da komai, kuma tabbas ba su da alaƙa da Sprout.

TWEET #4 : Ƙarya ta farko - babu wani abu game da Seto a cikin tweets ɗin da RealYBOP ta wallafa. Ƙarya ta biyu - Staci ba ta yi wa ofisoshin jami'a alama ba. Staci tana mamakin, kamar yadda muke duka, wa zai zama wanda doka ta tanada don ɓata suna da cin zarafin RealYBOP. An ambaci RealYBOP a cikin ƙararraki 3: za a gano mutanen da ke wallafa tweets na RealYBOP, kuma za su iya yin asarar kuɗi mai yawa.

Duba wannan sashe na shafi na #1: @BrainOnPorn Twitter yanzu an sanya masa suna a cikin ƙararraki biyu na ɓata suna!

TWEET #5: (wanda aka liƙa a shafin RealYBOP). RealYBOP ta haɗu da abokin hulɗarta mai ɓata suna, kuma mutumin yana karɓar diyya daga babban mai lalata da batsa xHamster , David Ley:

DARVO ta Ley.

TWEET #6 : Membobin RealYBOP suna wasa da wauta, suna amsawa da banzan magana don mayar da martani ga tambaya mai sauƙi: “ Wa ke da alhakin ɓata sunan RealYBOP? ” Cyberstalker RealYBOP ya wallafa lambar lasisin Staci a shafinsa na Twitter, wanda ya saɓa wa ƙa'idodin Twitter.

Kawai ƙarshen RealYBOP/Prause iceberg na ɓata suna - duba wannan shafin yana tattara bayanan RealYBOP na ci gaba da ɓata sunan Staci Sprout: CIN ZARAFI, CIN ZARAFI DA KYAUTA DAGA ABUBUWAN DA BA A TSAMMANINSU BA A MATSAYIN MAI ƘARFIN MAGANCE JARUMIN JIMA'I . Duba kuma - An fallasa ƙage-ƙirƙirar Nicole Prause na wanda aka zalunta a matsayin wanda ba shi da tushe: ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka zalunta ba.

————————————————

Yi amfani, ta amfani da asusunta na RealYBOP (ko yanzu Anti-YBOP), ta ci gaba da mulkinta na yin kutse ta hanyar yanar gizo da ɓata sunan Staci Sprout:

@BrainOnPorn ta kai hari ga Staci Sprout saboda shawarar cewa shaƙe mata don su huta na iya zama matsala :

Kasancewar shaƙa a cikin batsa a ko'ina da alama yana haifar da ƙaruwar shaƙa a cikin mata yayin jima'i . RealYBOP tana kare shaƙa, don haka tana jefa duk waɗannan matan a ƙarƙashin motar batsa.

Staci ta zaren tare da karatu da labarai:

https://twitter.com/Stacisprout/status/1304545617419677698

----------

RealYBOP ta ci gaba da maganganun yanar gizo na Staci. Gaske ban mamaki rantings:

----------

RealYBOP yana bata cikakkiyar ma'ana a cikin zauren Toates. Babu wanda ke yin rahoton rahoto, balle 'yan sanda su yi rahoto. Wannan maƙaryaci ne.

RealYBOP (Sallar) cin zarafin Staci Sprout, duk da haka kuma. Duba:

PDF's of Sworn affidavits a cikin kararraki biyu na cin zarafin tarayya da aka gabatar a kan Prause

---------------

Ya ci gaba da cyberstalk Staci Sprout (wanda ke ba da shaida a kan Prause a cikin karar 2 na lalata). PDF na rantsuwar rantsuwar kama aiki a wata kotu ta daban biyu da ta gurfanar da su a gaban Salisu:

RealYBOP ya ta'allaka ne game da abin da Staci da Liz walker suka fada a zahiri:

RealYBOP yaci gaba da gabatar da bayanan karya, karya, da kuma ikirarin goro:

updates:

---------

Yuli, 2020: RealYBOP (Fuskantar) ya zargi Gary Wilson da aika barazanar barazanar mutuwa dangane da 'musayar' ra'ayoyi game da "Rashin Jima'i da Sakamakon ativearfin Mummunan Ciki a Tasirin Yin Jima'i Ga Mazaje Masu Bayanan Yin Jima'i Da Mazaje" (2020).

Ma'anar: Prause da membobin RealYBOP guda 3 sun buga wani bincike na musamman. Daga nan, Ley da Prause sun karkatar da bincikensu don yin iƙirarin cewa binciken ya karyata matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa: "Martani ga Jima'i da Tasirin Yanayi mara kyau akan Tashin Hankali ga Maza Masu Jima'i da ke Yin Jima'i da Maza". Babu abin da zai iya zama daga gaskiya, kamar yadda na bayyana a cikin wannan zaren tweet 5:

1 / Yadda ake kera furofaganda: David Ley sabon gidan yanar gizon PT.

Ley ya yi iƙirarin cewa sabon binciken kan hyperexuals (addicts addicts) yana ba da hujja a kan lalata-lalata batsa.

Kamar yadda za mu gani, sabon binciken ba zai iya gaya mana komai game da PIED ba. pic.twitter.com/GW1RkeFqES

— Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa (@YourBrainOnPorn) 8 ga Yuli, 2020

Hasalima, RealYBOP da Ley sun bi ni da ƙarya iri-iri, kuma daga ƙarshe mahaukaciyar zargi da na yi barazanar kashe duk wanda bai yarda da ni ba. Duk wani abu don haɓaka masana'antar batsa ta hanyar ƙasƙantar da waɗanda ke ƙalubalantar ta. Kadan daga sakonnin su na tweets:

Liesarin ƙaryar, yana cewa ban sami damar zuwa cikakken karatun ba. Ba gaskiya bane, kuma zaku iya gani daga jadawalin da ke ƙasa, cewa nayi cikakken karatun.

Ƙarin tallan da ke ihu daga RealYBOP:

Baya ga hare-haren ad hominem , Ley & RealYBOP sun yi ƙarya, suna iƙirarin wani bincike na 2007 "Na so" yayi daidai da binciken da ake yi yanzu . Zaren tweet dina mai tsawon 6 ya fallasa su a matsayin ƙarya:

1 / Masana'antar batsa shills RealYBOP (Nicole Prause) & David Ley sun yi kuskuren gabatar da wani bincike na farko a yunƙurin da suka yi na ɓata ra'ayoyina game da rubutun Ley.
Suna da'awar binciken 2007 kuma binciken da akeyi yanzu yayi daidai. Bari mu tona asirin wannan karyar.
Ley & RealYBOP tweet: pic.twitter.com / RwmUi0JTFh

— Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa (@YourBrainOnPorn) 9 ga Yuli, 2020

Ga sukar da YBOP ta yi mana game da fallasa ƙaryarsu da kuma bayyana abin da binciken zai iya gaya mana da abin da ba zai iya faɗa mana ba: Sukar da aka yi game da da'awar da ke tattare da "Martani ga Jima'i da Tasirin Yanayi mara kyau akan Sha'awar Jima'i a cikin Maza Masu Jima'i da Maza" (2020) . Ga ɗan gajeren sigar:

Labarin masana'antar batsa kuma abokin haɗin gwiwar wannan takarda Prause da abokin haɗin gwiwarta Ley sun yi iƙirarin cewa wannan sabon takarda iri ɗaya ne da gwaje-gwajen da aka bayyana a cikin 2007 a cikin babi na littafi na Bancroft da Janssen (wanda shi ma abokin haɗin gwiwar wannan sabon takarda ne). " Ilimin Halayyar Jima'i., Babi: Tsarin Kula da Dual-control: Matsayin hana jima'i da motsa jiki a cikin sha'awar jima'i da ɗabi'a ." Mai Bugawa: Indiana University Press, Edita: Erick Janssen, shafi na 197-222. Haɗi zuwa babi

Amma duk da haka wannan sabuwar takarda ba ɗaya ce da gwaje-gwajen farko ba, kuma ga wasu bambance-bambance:

Bambanci # 1 - Nazarin na 2007 yayi hira da maza waɗanda ba za su iya tayar da hankali ta batsa don tantance abin da ke iya faruwa ba.

Na farko, ba kamar sabon binciken na 2020 ba, masu binciken 2007 sunyi hira da 50% na samari (matsakaici shekaru 29) waɗanda ba a fahimtar su da batsa ta gwaji a cikin lab, kuma sun nuna cewa ƙarancin lalata game da batsa shine wataƙila sanadin hakan. Masanan kimiyya sun yi bayanin cewa maza suna ta yin amfani da sanduna inda porn ya zama ko'ina. An fice daga binciken 2007:

Duk da haka, lokacin da muka yi amfani da wannan ƙirar (tare da nau'ikan fina-finan jima'i guda biyu, abubuwan da ke ɗauke da hankali da buƙatar aiki) a cikin wannan sabon samfurin, mun ci karo da wani abin mamaki wanda ba a zata ba, amma mai ban sha'awa. Maza goma sha biyu, ko kusan kashi 50% na mutane 25 na farko (matsakaicin shekaru = shekaru 29), ba su mayar da martani ga abubuwan da ke motsa sha'awa ba (watau, taurin azzakari na ƙasa da kashi 5% ga shirye-shiryen fina-finan da ba a tilasta ba; maza 8 suna da taurin kai 0%. Wannan, a fahimtarmu, ɗaya ne daga cikin ƙananan nazarin ilimin halayyar ɗan adam inda maza suka shiga waɗanda aka ɗauke su daga al'umma - a yanayinmu, daga gidajen wanka, asibitocin STD, mashaya, da sauransu.

A wasu daga cikin waɗannan wurare, abubuwan da ke motsa sha'awa ta hanyar jima'i (gami da hotunan bidiyo) suna ko'ina, kuma wannan, tare da sharhi daga mahalarta game da rashin abubuwan da suka fi ban sha'awa, na musamman ("niche"), ko mafi tsauri ko "kinky", ya sa muka yi la'akari da yiwuwar cewa yawan waɗanda ba su amsa ba na iya danganta da yawan fallasa da gogewa da abubuwan da ke bayyana jima'i.

Bambanci # 2 - binciken 2007 da aka ƙaddara game da amfani da batsa!

Masu binciken sun kuma lura cewa, " Tattaunawa da mutanen da abin ya shafa sun ƙarfafa ra'ayinmu cewa a wasu daga cikinsu yawan fallasa ga batsa ya haifar da ƙarancin amsawa ga batsa na vanilla da kuma ƙaruwar buƙatar sabon abu, bambancin ."

Tattaunawar da batutuwa sun karfafa ra'ayinmu cewa a wasu daga cikinsu akwai babban zanewa ga erotica kamar sun haifar da karɓar amsa ga "jima'i na vanilla" erotica da kuma karuwa da buƙatar sabon abu da bambanci, a wasu lokuta haɗe tare da bukatun musamman irin abubuwan da suka faru don samun tasowa.

Bambancin # 3 -2007 binciken ya kara da gwaji na 2 dangane da batutuwan batsa-kadan.

Masu binciken sun ƙara gwaji na biyu don la'akari da ƙarancin sha'awar batsa da ke haifarwa. Gwaji na biyu ya haɗa da sabbin bidiyoyi, masu tsayi, da bambance-bambance, kuma ya ba wa mutane damar zaɓar bidiyoyi da kansu. Duk da haka da yawa ba su amsa ba!

Mun sake fasalin binciken kuma muka yanke shawarar kawar da abubuwan da ke raba hankali da kuma karkatar da buƙatun aiki da kuma haɗa sabbin shirye-shiryen bidiyo daban-daban, da kuma wasu shirye-shiryen bidiyo masu tsayi. Haka kuma, maimakon gabatar da batutuwa tare da jerin bidiyo na waɗanda aka zaɓa kafin lokaci (“wanda mai bincike ya zaɓa”), mun bar su su zaɓi bidiyo biyu da kansu daga cikin jerin 10, waɗanda aka nuna samfoti na daƙiƙa 10 kuma waɗanda suka haɗa da nau'ikan halayen jima'i daban-daban (misali, jinsi na rukuni, jima'i tsakanin ƙabilu, S & M, da sauransu). Mun ɗauki ƙarin mutane 51 kuma mun gano cewa tare da ingantaccen ƙira har yanzu maza 20, ko kusan 25%, ba su amsa da kyau ga bidiyon jima'i ba (ƙarfin azzakari na ƙasa da 10% a martanin dogon fim ɗin da aka zaɓa da kansu).

Gwaje-gwajen 2007 sun tantance "ƙananan masu amsawa" daban-daban, kuma sun ba da rahoton cewa: "ƙididdigar ta nuna cewa yayin da yawan finafinan batsa da aka gani a cikin shekarar da ta gabata ya karu da mai halarta mafi kusantar ana rarrabawa a matsayin mai sauƙin amsawa."

Bambanci # 4 - 2007 binciken bai tantance tsinkaye ba

Gwaje-gwajen da aka yi a shekarar 2007 ba su tantance yawan jima'i ba. Binciken da aka yi a shekarar 2020 ya yi, kuma ya kwatanta ƙungiyar yawan jima'i da yawan iko. (Duk da haka babu wani kimantawa na mutum ɗaya na abubuwan da ke ba da gudummawa ga ED, kamar yadda yake a shekarar 2007). Duk da haka, ƙungiyar yawan jima'i ta shekarar 2020 ba ta da yawan martanin al'aura ga batsa fiye da ƙungiyar kula da batsa:

Marubutan sun "sarrafa" wasu dalilai na daban - don daidaita martanin ƙungiyoyin biyu ta hanyar wucin gadi kuma sun kammala da cewa ƙungiyoyin ba su mayar da martani daban da juna ba. Kuma ana iya faɗi, idan aka yi la'akari da yadda suke nuna goyon bayan batsa.

RealYBOP ta kara “bata shi” ta hanyar karya da yawa da kuma sakonnin batanci da suka shafi ni, Gabe Deem da Staci Sprout. Bari mu bi ta cikin labaran RealYBOP na tweets masu amfani:

Ban yi karya ba. Na ce Ley ya cire zane wanda ya nuna cewa maza da mata ba su da amsa fiye da sarrafawa. Wannan gaskiyane. Tabbataccen abu - "sarrafawa don" ya ba marubutan RealYBOP damar da'awar bambanci tsakanin batutuwa da sarrafawa bashi da ma'ana. Amma takardar ba ta ba mu bayanai don bincika aikinsu ba.

Ofarin guda yaji. Bayani: Na san yadda sarrafa ƙididdiga ke aiki da yadda za a iya sarrafa su.

Bayan na buga ƙalubalena ga ikirarinsu, RealYBOP ta yi ta sukar cin zarafi sau 7 a shafinta na Twitter. Huɗu daga cikin sakonninta na Twitter sun ce na yi barazanar kashe masana kimiyya. Ba ta bayar da wata shaida ba, domin ban taɓa yin irin wannan barazanar ba. Wannan ya nuna ɓata suna , domin tana zargina da laifuka na gaske . Ina tsammanin ƙarar bata suna guda biyu ba su isa gare ta ba.

Tweet mai ɓata suna #1 . Babu wanda ya yi min ƙarya (ba ta dogara ga kowa da ya karanta "shaidar" ta ba):

Wasikar ACLU ba ita ce abin da RealYBOP ke ikirarin yi ba. Duba: Nicole Prause & David Ley sun yi rantsuwar ƙarya a cikin ƙarar ɓata suna (Satumba, 2019).

Tweet mai ɓata suna #2 : Na yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa na buga binciken 2007 sama da sau 100,000 kuma na yi barazanar kashe duk wanda ya ƙi amincewa da ni. Shaidar da ke nuna cewa ta rasa hankalinta?

Ga binciken da aka yi a shekarar 2007 tare da dukkan bayanan da suka dace: Tsarin Kulawa Biyu - Matsayin Hana Jima'i & Jin Daɗi a cikin Sha'awar Jima'i da Halayyarsa (2007).

Ba ta faɗi gaskiya ba, kamar yadda marubutan suka ce batsa ta haifar da ƙarancin amsawar jima'i ga mutanen da ke yin batsa. A wani gwaji da aka yi amfani da bidiyon batsa, kashi 50% na samarin ba za su iya yin sha'awar jima'i ko kuma su yi jima'i da batsa ba (matsakaicin shekaru shine 29). Masu binciken da suka yi mamaki sun gano cewa matsalar rashin ƙarfin mazan "yana da alaƙa da yawan fallasa da gogewa da kayan da ke bayyana jima'i. " Mazan da ba su da hankali sun shafe lokaci mai tsawo a mashaya da wuraren wanka inda batsa ke "ko'ina," kuma suna ci gaba da wasa. Mazan sun bayyana cewa " yawan fallasa ga batsa ya haifar da ƙarancin amsawa ga "jima'in vanilla" da kuma ƙaruwar buƙatar sabon abu da bambancin ra'ayi. "

Tweet mai ɓata suna #3 : Baya ga ikirarin karya na yi barazanar kisa, ikirarinta game da kididdiga ba su da wani tasiri. Binciken 2007 ya ce amfani da batsa yana haifar da raguwar sha'awar jima'i.

Tweet mai ɓata suna #4 : An fallasa ƙaryar RealYBOP a nan: Sukar da ake yi game da da'awar da ke kewaye da "Martani ga Jima'i da Tasirin Yanayi mara kyau akan Sha'awar Jima'i a cikin Maza Masu Jima'i da ke Yin Jima'i da Maza" (2020)

RealYBOP ta kara da wannan tweet din, tana mai bayyana cewa ba ta san ma'anar rashin kuzari ba:

Wannan ba shine karo na farko da Prause ko asusun baƙon sa ba (RealYBOP) ya zarge ni da wasu game da aika barazanar kisa. Ko ta yaya, Prause bai taba bayar da shaidar ni ko wani na san na tura barazanar mutuwa ba. Duk qarya da cin zarafi ya shigar da karar sa da laifi a kotunan Tarayya Duba: Nicole Prause qarya na wadanda aka yi wa lakabi-hood wanda ba a bayyana shi a matsayin mara tushe: ita ce mai cin zarafin, ba wacce aka azabtar.

updates:

Agusta, 2020: Gary Wilson (Brainka a kan Porn) Ya Samu Nasara ta Shari’a Ga Masanin Sexologist Nicole Prause kokarin da yayi na shi

An yi watsi da ƙoƙarin hana umarnin dakatar da amfani kamar yadda ba shi da kyau: ta bashi kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin adawa da SLAPP (Mataki na ashirin da - Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP).

ASHLAND, OREGON: Agusta 16, 2020: Marubuci mafi sayarwa kuma mai fafutukar kare lafiyar jama'a Gary Wilson ya yi nasara a shari'a a kan mai bincike kan ilimin jima'i da kuma mai fafutukar kare hakkin batsa Nicole Prause. A ranar 6 ga Agusta, Kotun Koli ta Gundumar Los Angeles ta yanke hukunci cewa ƙoƙarin Prause na neman umarnin hana Wilson ya zama "ƙarar dabarar da ta shafi shiga cikin jama'a" (wanda aka fi sani da "ƙarar SLAPP"). A taƙaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ya yi amfani da tsarin hana Wilson don yin shiru da kuma rage haƙƙinsa na 'yancin faɗar albarkacin baki. Ta hanyar doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wa Prause ya biya kuɗin lauyan Wilson.

Wilson shine marubucin littafin da ya fi sayar da littattafai na Your Brain On Porn: Internet Porn and the Emerging Science of Addiction , mai gabatar da wani jawabi mai suna " The Great Porn Experiment ," (kalli mutane miliyan 13+) kuma mai masaukin baki na gidan yanar gizon www.YourBrainOnPorn.com , wani gidan yanar gizo mai cike da bayanai kan sabbin bincike, kafofin watsa labarai, da rahotannin kai game da illolin batsa da illolinsa. Wilson ya daɗe yana sukar binciken da Prause ta wallafa da kuma bayanan jama'a game da amfani da batsa.

" Abin mamaki ne cewa masana'antar batsa ta ɓoye kanta a cikin kariyar Kwaskwarima ta Farko yayin da masu fafutukar batsa kamar Nicole Prause ke ƙoƙarin iyakancewa da kuma rufe suka game da haɗarin cutar da batsa ga masu amfani da ita da kuma jama'a ," in ji Wilson bayan hukuncin Kotu. " Wannan wata muhimmiyar nasara ce kan ɓata suna da cin zarafi da cin zarafi da masu fafutuka ke fuskanta waɗanda ke ƙoƙarin yin magana a bainar jama'a game da illolin batsa ."

Nasarar shari'ar ta zo ne bayan wani korafi da aka shigar kan SCRAM Media da ke Burtaniya saboda wallafa wani labari da ya yi ikirarin cewa Prause ta sami "barazanar kisa" sakamakon wani kamfen na tara kuɗi daga mai masaukin baki na NoFap, Alex Rhodes. A cewar wata sanarwar manema labarai ta Burtaniya , labarin SCRAM ya yi ƙarya cewa NoFap da Rhodes sun haɗa kansu da masu tsattsauran ra'ayi na dama (gami da masu adawa da Yahudawa); sun zuga masu tsattsauran ra'ayi su musguna wa Prause; sun gudanar da wani taron jama'a wanda ya haifar da bin diddigin Prause; kuma sun shigar da ƙara mara amfani a Kotun Tarayya ta Amurka don hana binciken ilimi na Prause. Lokacin da aka gabatar da shaidu da ke musanta waɗannan da'awar, SCRAM ta janye labarin, ta biya Rhodes diyya mai yawa da kuɗaɗen shari'a, kuma ta nemi afuwa a bainar jama'a , kafin ta rufe gaba ɗaya.

An gabatar da karar ne a cikin wasu kararraki biyu na tarayya da ba su da alaka da ita da ake zargin ta da yin kalamai na karya da kuma lahani game da mutanen da suka yi korafin batsa ta yanar gizo: Donald L. Hilton, Jr. v. Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gundumar Amurka don Yankin Yammacin Texas San Antonio Division, Magana mai lamba 5: 19-CV-00755-OLG; da Alexander Rhodes da Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Lardin Amurka don Yankin Yammacin Pennsylvania, Magana mai lamba 2: 19-cv-01366. A wa] annan hukunce-hukuncen, masu shigar da kara sun yi zargin ba da gaskiya, maganganun batanci da ake zarginsu da aikatawa, cin zarafin jima'i, da akidar wariyar launin fata, da kuma ikirarin cewa suna gudanar da bincike ne ta hanyar tilasta bin doka da kuma kungiyoyin masu ba da lasisi. A kowane yanayi, maza da mata da yawa sun gabatar da wasu kalamai da ke nuna cewa Prause ma ya yi niyya ga su: sanarwa # 1, sanarwa # 2, sanarwa # 3, sanarwa # 4, sanarwa # 5, sanarwa # 6, sanarwa # 7, sanarwa # 8, sanarwa # 9, sanarwa # 10, sanarwa # 11, sanarwa # 12, sanarwa # 13, sanarwa # 14, sanarwa # 15, sanarwa # 16.

Agusta, 2020: Dama tun kafin Anti-SLAPP ta saurari lauyan Nicole Prause ta yi kokarin dainawa saboda ta yi kokarin tilasta shi ya nuna halin rashin da'a. Ya ce Prause na nuna adawa da barazanar kai shi kara.

Kowa na iya gabatar da umarnin hana shi ba tare da biyan ko sisi ba. A takaice dai, hanya ce mai matukar tsada don yunƙurin ƙara amincin ga yaƙin neman zaɓen ɓatancin da Prause da 'ya'yanta ke bi. Na yi imanin cewa, a wani ɓangare, yunƙuri ne na murkushe maganata kamar yadda take fata ba zan iya kare kaina ba. Da farko ta fadawa alkalin cewa ni talaka ne ("ba abinda ya rasa") a cikin bukatarta ta TRO. Ta yiwu ta ɗauka ni ba ta da kuɗi ne saboda, duk da cewa ina da dalilai masu yawa, ban taɓa shigar mata da karar ɓata suna ba. Ba na son ɓata lokaci na.

Ina ganin yunƙurin hana ta yin hakan shi ma yunƙurin ɓata min suna ne a matsayin shaida a cikin ƙarar bata suna guda biyu da wasu suka shigar a kan Prause. Bai yi nasara ba, kuma yanzu ya ƙara ɓata mata suna. Me ke faruwa….

Kamar yadda aka fada a sama, alkalin farko ya karyata Yi amfani da umarnin takaita wucin gadi a watan Fabrairu, 2020, lokacin da ta shigar da shi ba tare da sanarwa a wurina ba. Wannan alama ce mai ƙarfi a gare ta cewa tana da rauni. Karyatawa game da TRO yana nufin cewa Prause dole ne ya sanar da ni game da umarnin hanawa, kuma an saita shi don sauraro na farko (wanda ya haifar da ji na biyu, kamar yadda Prause ba ta yi mini hidimar daidai ba).

Tsawon watanni 3 masu zuwa, Prause za ta iya janye umarnin hana ba tare da wani sakamako ga kanta ba, kuma da na makale da kuɗin lauyana ba tare da wata matsala ba. A watan Yuni, wani ɓangare na guje wa kasancewa a gaban Prause a zaman sauraron ƙarar da aka shirya yi a watan Yuli, kuma wani ɓangare na martanin zargin da aka yi mata ba bisa ƙa'ida ba na yi mata barazana don danne muryata, na shigar da ƙarar hana SLAPP na a janye umarnin hana . A wannan lokacin, za ta iya ci gaba ne kawai. Takardun kotu da aka shigar a cikin ƙarar hana SLAPP ta:

Na shigar da ƙarata ne saboda Prause ta fara kai ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar ƙarar idan na zo CA don bayar da shaida a zaman sauraron ƙarar.

Kamar yadda ya bayyana, alƙalin ya haɗu da batutuwan biyu, kuma duka Prause da ni mun sami damar shiga nesa (saboda Covid 19). Wannan ya kiyaye ni daga zuwa koina kusa da ita, alhamdu lillahi. Wataƙila ya bayyana cewa, banda barazanar ta da jiki, Na kasance mai guje wa kasancewarta. Kotun na ranar 5th na watan Agusta da ke amsawa ga sanarwar Juli na 29 Yuli:

Jim kaɗan kafin zaman sauraren ƙarar na ranar 6 ga Agusta, lauyanta ya yi ƙoƙarin janye kansa daga wakiltarta amma bai yi nasara ba. Ɗaya daga cikin dalilansa, a cewar sanarwarsa , shine tana ƙoƙarin tilasta masa yin abin da ba zai iya yi ba da gaskiya. Mun san daga takardar da ya shigar tana neman a ci gaba da shari'ar cewa ta yi ƙoƙarin sa shi ya gabatar da "shaida" da yawa da ba za a yarda da su ba (mai yiwuwa ta hanyar wasiƙu daga abokanta, da kuma zarge-zargen da ba a tallafa musu ba), don haka muna zargin yana nufin hakan ne.

Lauyan nata ya kuma nemi ya janye saboda a bayyane yake yana barazanar da shi saboda ba zai yi mata tayin ba. Ya bayyana cewa sadarwa tare da Gwadawa ba ta da tabbas. Wannan ya faru ne bayan da ya mayar da martani game da motsata na anti-SLAPP (kuma babu wani aikin doka da za a yi da ƙarar saurarar kansa).

Alkalin ya yanke shawarar kada ya jinkirta zaman sauraron karar, kuma lauyan mai ba da shawara na kamfanin ya wakilci Prause, wanda ya yi aiki mai kyau a madadinta - duk da cewa ba shi da wani aiki da zai yi da shi a lokacin da aka magance duk ƙin amincewa da shaidun. (Alkalin da ke cikin ƙarar batanci ta Alex Rhodes kwanan nan ya soki Prause saboda " halayyarta ta karkatar da hankali da ɓoye sirrinta" ).

Mako guda kafin sauraron Anti-SLAPP, An yi amfani da Prause akan Twitter yin sanarwar karya cewa tana da “umarni na kariya” a kaina, tana tunzura mabiyanta masu kwazo don yin lalata da ni:

Duk da haka wata karyace mai girman gaske. Kuma ba ɗaya wanda yawancin alƙalai zasuyi da alheri ba.

Ba zato ba tsammani, don ba da shawarata ta adawa da SLAPP, dole alkalin ya gano (1) cewa umarnin hana ta da wuya ya yi nasara bisa cancantarsa, kuma (2) cewa, a zahiri, ƙoƙari ne na danne haƙƙoƙi na yi magana a kan maslaha ta jama'a.

Layin da ke ƙasa shi ne cewa Prause ya kawo asarar motsi na anti-SLAPP a kan kanta ta hanyar yin rajista, sannan ba ta faduwa ba, umarnin hana ta mara tushe a kaina. Ta shawo kanta ta hanyar barazanar lauyanta da kuma sanar da cewa ta ci nasara ba tare da bata lokaci ba. Har yanzu, ita ce mai aikata laifin ba wanda aka azabtar.

Tsarin shari'a ba kafofin sada zumunta ba ne, kuma "shaidar" da aka ƙirƙira da kuma zarge-zargen ƙarya da ita da abokan hulɗarta suka watse a kotun ra'ayin jama'a ba sa bayyana a kotuna na gaske. Wannan shine dalilin da ya sa SCRAM ta sha kashi lokacin da ta buga ƙaryarta, kuma ba ta nuna wata alama mai kyau ta damarta a cikin ɗayan shari'o'in bata suna guda biyu da aka yi mata ba.

Agusta, 2020: A cikin umarnin hana takunkumi na Prause (wanda aka yi watsi da shi ba shi da wani amfani) ta ƙirƙira abin da ake kira “shaida,” wanda ya haɗa da yin lalata da ɓata ɗana.

A cikin buƙatar Prause na neman umarnin hana ta, ta yi wa kanta ƙarya, tana cewa na saka adireshinta a YBOP da Twitter ( rantsuwar ƙarya ba sabon abu ba ne game da Prause ). A cikin mafi tsayin labaran, Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa ina da haɗari saboda ni da ɗana babba "masu sha'awar bindiga" ne waɗanda ba su da "abin da za su rasa."

Ta yi ikirarin “tabbatar” da hakan ta hanyar hada da wani tsohon hoto da aka dauka na dana (wanda ya fi shi tsayi) da kuma wani saurayi dan Asiya mai kyau da bindiga. Yi amfani da'awar ya fi guntu, 20-wani abu saurayi ne ni! Yi amfani da gangan ya ɓatar da kotu.

Wannan hoton da ke sama ɗaya ne daga cikin hotuna uku na ɗana da Prause ta saka a cikin buƙatarta ta hana yin ƙarya. Prause ta bincika ta cikin Facebook na sirri na ɗana don gano duk wani hoto da za ta iya fassara shi ba daidai ba.

Gaskiya: Ni ko dana ba mu da bindiga. Hoton da ke sama daga 2014 ne, kuma Mataimakin Sakataren Sacramento sheriff ne ya ɗauke shi a ɗakin ajiyar makamai na soja (don samari 2 su yi amfani da shi azaman janareta na meme). Ya kasance wargi. Kamar yadda bayani ya gabata (a ƙasa) ɗana ya ɗauki watanni da yawa yana aiki tare da Ma'aikatar Shari'a ta California, yana gina sabuwar fasahar IT don taimakawa ressionungiyar Danniyar Gang tare da ayyukanta. Kamar yadda ɗana ya bayyana a cikin rantsuwar rantsuwarsa, ɗayan mutumin ya kasance mai horo a kamfanin fasaha.

Wannan mummunar bayanin, wanda aka samo ta ta hanyar yin hira da ɗana, cikakken misali ne na yadda Nicole Prause ta ƙirƙira abin da ake kira “shaida”.

Agusta, 2020: Masu shiryawa na 5th taron kasa da kasa kan al'amuran ƙari bijiro da Fuskantarwa kamar aikata rantsuwar karya a yunƙurin da ta gaza a umarnin hanawa (watau nasarar Anti-SLAPP)

Da aka fallasa “shaidar” da ke cikin littafinta na asali na TRO a matsayin ƙarya, sanarwar Prause ta watan Yulin 2020 (wanda aka shirya don zaman sauraren ƙara na 6 ga Agusta) ta haifar da wani sabon labari game da tafiyar da na yi zuwa Jamus shekaru biyu da suka gabata (2018) don halartar taron ƙasa da ƙasa na 5 kan jarabar ɗabi'a (ICBA). Prause ta yi rantsuwar ƙarya a cikin sanarwar TRO ɗinta, tana da'awar ƙarya cewa ita ce mai gabatarwa a taron ICBA, kuma na yi tafiya zuwa Jamus ne kawai don “fuskantar da ita.” Abin banza, duk da haka yawancin adawar Prause ga ƙin SLAPP na yanzu ya dogara ne akan wannan ikirarin ƙarya guda ɗaya.

Ga ɗaya daga cikin batutuwan 5 daga sanarwar da ta kawo a watan Yuli wanda ke nuni da tafiya ta zuwa Jamus:

Jumlar da ta biyo bayan ikirarinta na Jamus tana da matuƙar ban sha'awa: " Ko gaskiya ne ko a'a. " Bari in taimaka: Ba gaskiya ba ne. Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa tafiyar da na yi a Jamus ita ce " tushen buƙatar agajin da Prause ta yi a yanzu. " Idan aka karyata wani ɓangare na labarin Jamus na Prause, duk shari'arta ta lalace kamar Humpty-Dumpty. Kuma, wannan shawarar da aka rubuta a hankali ita ce kawai "shaidar" da lauyan Prause ya yi ƙoƙarin bayarwa:

Bayan haka, Prause ta ci karo da lamura da yawa inda ta yi imanin cewa mutumin da ba a tantance ta ba ya bincika. Ko wannan gaskiya ne ko a'a, tushen buƙatar Prause na yanzu don taimako shine bayyanar rikice-rikicen rikice-rikicen cikin barazanar arangama ta zahiri.

Na san wannan bunkum ne don haka na tambayi masu shirya ICBA su tabbatar da cewa ba a taɓa buƙatar Prause ta halarta ba kuma ba a taɓa yin rijistar ta a taron ba . Wasikarsu da ta tabbatar da cewa Prause ta yi wa kanta ƙarya:

An kama a cikin wani ƙaryar kuma.

Kawai dai don a sani, Prause ba ta taɓa halarta ko kuma an gayyace ta don gabatarwa a taron ICBA ba. Prause ba ta yarda da jarabar ɗabi'a ba. A duk tsawon aikinta, Prause ta yi yaƙi da manufar jarabar ɗabi'a, musamman jarabar jima'i da batsa.

Agusta, 2020: Dangane da nasarar da na samu na shari'a, @BrainOnPorn (Prause) ya ci gaba da yin lalata da yanar gizo da lalata suna

A watan Maris na 2020, Prause ta nemi a ba ni umarnin hana ni na ɗan lokaci (TRO) ta hanyar amfani da "shaida" da aka ƙirƙira da kuma ƙaryarta ta yau da kullun (tana zargina da bin diddigi). A cikin buƙatar Prause na umarnin hana ni, ta yi wa kanta ƙarya, tana cewa na saka adireshinta a YBOP da Twitter ( rantsuwar ƙarya ba sabon abu bane da Prause ). Na shigar da ƙara a kan Prause saboda amfani da tsarin shari'a ba daidai ba ta hanyar tilasta mini ɗaukar lauya da fatan yin shiru da cin zarafi. A ranar 6 ga Agusta, Kotun Koli ta Gundumar Los Angeles ta yanke hukunci cewa ƙoƙarin Prause na samun umarnin hana ni ya zama "ƙarar dabarar da ta shafi shiga jama'a" (wanda aka fi sani da "ƙarar SLAPP") . A taƙaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta yi amfani da tsarin hana ni don ƙoƙarin cin zarafi da rage haƙƙoƙina na 'yancin faɗar albarkacin baki. Ta hanyar doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wa Prause ya biya kuɗin lauya na.

A martanin da ta mayar, RealYBOP ta yi bincike a shafina inda na fallasa ta a matsayin mai yin lalata da kuma bin diddigin ɗana ta yanar gizo , da kuma ɓata masa suna a cikin umarninta na hana shi (wanda Kotu ta yi watsi da shi a matsayin cin zarafi mara amfani). Abin takaici ne.

Fiye da ƙari RealYBOP & Yi amfani da wasiƙun da aka cika da ƙarya waɗanda abokai masu kusancin batsa suka rubuta (galibi membobin RealYBOP) bisa umarnin Fuskantarwa. Ta yi ƙoƙari ta shigar da 4 daga waɗannan haruffa a cikin umarnin hana ta na yaudara, amma alƙali ya ga dama ta hanyar su a matsayin ƙage (marubutan wasiƙun sun sake faɗar abin da Prause ya gaya musu - waɗanda ƙarya ce, ba tare da wata babbar shaidar tallafi ba.

Haruffa 4 da aka zana a cikin tweet na RYBOP na sama, wanda Prause ya yi tweeted sau da yawa, bai faɗi abin da ta ce sun faɗa ba. Babu wani daga cikin marubutan da ya ce na yi wa mawallafansu bita. Haruffa da ba a taɓa amfani da su ba sun ƙunshi ainihin hujja don tallafawa da'awar Prause. Takaitaccen bayani game da haruffa 4 da take bata wakilci da yawa a tweets dinta:

Daga Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da ya faɗi game da ni ko Yin wasa.
Daga Rebecca Sullivan ta Kanada. Wasikar mai shafi 2 tana da layin amai guda daya game da ni, tana cewa na kawo takaitaccen bayani kan Motion na Kanada 47. Babu wani abu kuma.
By Madita Oeming. Ba ta taɓa da'awar cewa na sa mata ido ko yi mata barazana ta kowace hanya ba. Madadin haka, Oeming yayi kuka saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da tallafi da'awarta. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita karairayin Prause… amma ba tare da wata shaida ba.
Wasikar karshe ta kasance tatsuniya ce ta Daniel Burgess, wanda ya mallaki RealYBOP, ya yi amfani da laƙabi don yin magana da ni ta yanar gizo, kuma shi ma ya shiga cikin maganganu da yawa na ɓata suna. Gaskiya game da Burgess da ma'amalar mu sosai rubuce a wannan shafin. Ayyukan doka suna ci gaba da Mista Burgess, gami da magance tweets na kwanan nan (duba ƙasa) wanda ya zarge ni da aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa da bin mata 5. Duk maganganun da aka rubuta sau da yawa a Twitter sun zama bata suna ta hanyar, wanda shine mafi sauki irin na bata suna don samun sassauci a cikin kararrakin bata suna.

A kan ƙarin lalata sunan Prause, ba da ƙarfi ba da ƙarfi a bayan sunan laƙabi na RealYBOP. Troarin fashewa:

Wannan abin ƙyama ne mai ban mamaki. RealYBOP tweeting cin mutunci a karkashin matar Matt Fradd na bikin ranar bikin aurensu:

Defarin ɓata suna ta Prause da Burgess.

RealYBOP ta ci gaba da zarginta da laifin cin zarafi da gangan (bin diddigi), tana cewa YBOP tana barazanar kashe mu. Babu wata shaida, kamar yadda Prause ba ta da wata shaida ta bin diddigi ko cin zarafi don buƙatar umarnin hana ta damfara a kaina. Kotun ta yanke hukuncin cewa buƙatar umarnin hana ta Prause ta kasance "ƙarar dabarar da ta shafi shiga cikin jama'a" (wanda aka fi sani da "ƙarar SLAPP") . Prause ta yi ƙarya a cikin buƙatarta ta TRO ta yaudara, ba ta ba da wata shaida da za a iya tabbatarwa don tallafawa iƙirarinta na banza cewa na bi ta ko na musguna mata. A takaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta yi amfani da tsarin umarnin hana ta don ƙoƙarin cin zarafi na cikin shiru da kuma rage haƙƙoƙina na 'yancin faɗar albarkacin baki. Ta hanyar doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wa Prause ya biya kuɗin lauya na.

Ina jin tsoro game da "kimiyyar RealYBOP!" LOL. Na karyata shafin bincike na shafin tun da daɗewa - Ƙungiyar Kimiyyar Batsa (wanda aka fi sani da: "RealYourBrainOnPorn.com" da "PornographyResearch.com")

Karo na shida? Me take magana a kai? Eh, mun rasa shawarar WIPO (wanda abin mamaki ne), amma ba ƙara ba ce. Mun yi nasarar bin diddigin shari'o'i da suka shafi keta haƙƙin alamar kasuwancinta, kuma daga ƙarshe aka ba mu URL ɗin da ya karya doka. Wani matakin shari'a da ya shafi Prause (nasarar ƙarar SLAPP ta) ya fallasa ta a matsayin maƙaryaciya kuma mai bin diddigi (har ma da bin ɗana). Kokarin Prause na yin shiru Wilson ya gaza; an ƙi umarnin hana ta a matsayin rashin amfani kuma tana bin manyan kuɗaɗen lauya a hukuncin SLAPP.

Karin bata suna da ƙarya. Kuma, na shigar da ƙarar ƙara guda ɗaya kacal a kanta, zuwa yanzu, kuma Kotun ta sami goyon bayana.

An ci gaba da ɗaukar matakai na shari'a cikin nasara don dakatar da keta haƙƙin mallaka na RealYBOP da Daniel Burgess: HANKALI: YBOP ta sami www.RealYourBrainOnPorn.com a cikin yarjejeniyar keta haƙƙin kasuwanci

updates:

Agusta, 2020: LifeSite News na bugawa Ganawar Gary Wilson; Yi amfani da fitina da ɓata sunan marubuci, yana barazanar ɗaukar matakin doka (ba shakka).

Bayan nasarorin shari'a da na samu kan Nicole Prause, LifeSite News ta buga wannan hirar: Mai fafutukar kare haƙƙin batsa ya yi cikakken bayani game da nasarar shari'a a kan 'farfesan batsa' wanda ya yi ƙoƙarin amfani da kotu don rufe shi: Nicole Prause ta kai ƙarar Gary Wilson, wadda ta yi masa mummunan suka a yunƙurin ɓata masa suna a binciken da yake yi kan yadda batsa ke da illa. Ya yi nasara.

Kamar yadda ya faru da labarin Diana Davison na Post Millennial , Prause da asusunta na laƙabi ( @BrainOnPorn ) sun tursasa marubucin, sun yi ƙarya game da abin da labarin ya faɗa, kuma sun yi barazanar kai ƙara. Ga sakon Prause a ƙarƙashin sakon Twitter na marubuci Jonathan van Maren na labarinsa:

Shafin Twitter na Prause ya ƙunshi hoton allo na wasiƙar ƙarya mai cike da rudani (ba ainihin Cease & Desist ba ne) ga SASH. Prause ta lissafa duk wani laifi da ni da wasu muka yi mata, amma babu ɗayansu da ya faru. Wasiƙar Prause zuwa ga SASH, da tarin ƙaryarta, an yi watsi da ita a matsayin cin zarafi mara tallafi, wanda aka ƙirƙira don Prause ta iya buga shi a shafukan sada zumunta kamar dai halal ne. Kawai ƙarin "shaidar Prausian" da kanta ta samar. Hukumar SASH ta san cewa Prause mai ɓata suna ce da ke ɓata mata suna tana ɓata mata lokaci tana cin zarafinta da yawa.

Yi aiki kuma yayi ƙarya game da abun da labarin Van Maren ya ƙunsa. Babu wata ɓata suna, domin duk abin da ke ciki gaskiya ne. Babu wani abu daga cikin abubuwan da ta rubuta a shafin ta na Twitter cewa ta yi.

Kamar yadda za ku iya karantawa , labarin LifeSite bai ce komai ba game da lalata da yara ta hanyar jima'i ko kuma zama mai laifi. Prause ta zarge ni , Don Hilton , Staci Sprout , da wasu da laifin kiranta mai lalata da yara. Wannan yana ɗaya daga cikin dabarun da ta fi so. Da take yin ƙarya, Prause ta bayyana a cikin takardun kotu da aka shigar a cikin ƙarar da na shigar ta adawa da SLAPP da kuma a cikin ƙarar ɓata suna ta Hilton , cewa mun kira ta mai lalata da yara. Prause ba ta bayar da wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan wannan ƙaryar da ake yawan maimaitawa ba (har ma ta shawo kan abokai Jim Pfaus da Taylor Kohut su maimaita wannan ƙaryar a cikin wasiƙun da aka gabatar a cikin ƙarar cewa na ci nasara). Tsuntsayen gashin fuka-fukai suna kwance tare.

Kuma labarin bai ce Prause “mai laifi” ba ne, duk da cewa ta aikata laifukan da ba su dace ba ta hanyar (1) yin rantsuwar ƙarya a cikin takardun kotu , (2) shigar da rahotannin 'yan sanda na zamba , da kuma (3) shigar da rahotanni da koke-koke na zamba ga hukumomin gwamnati . Har ila yau, ana zargin Prause da laifin ɓata suna, barazana, cin zarafi, da kuma yin amfani da yanar gizo.

Kuma labarin bai ce Prause "ta kalli mutane suna yin jima'i" a dakin gwaje-gwajenta ba, duk da cewa ta yi iƙirarin cewa tana haɗa mutane zuwa na'urorin auna EEG kuma tana sa ido a kansu yayin da ake yin musu bahaya (wani lokacin don inzali). Shin wannan "kallon" mutane suna yin jima'i ne?

Abin da gaskiya ne shi ne an bai wa Prause kuɗi mai yawa don ya yi bincike kan shirin "Orgasmic Meditation" mai cike da lahani da kasuwanci (wanda a bayyane yake FBI ke bincikensa yanzu ). Orgasmic Meditation wata ƙungiya ce ta MLM da ke karɓar kuɗi mai yawa don koya wa maza yadda ake shafa gyambon ciki na abokin tarayya. Talla don nazarin Prause OM, ya nuna mutumin yana shafan mace (kuma bidiyo ne ):

Duk abin da kuke so ku kira shi, Fuskantar yana sa ido kan batutuwa yayin da ake lalata su (ko, kamar yadda ta kira shi, “haɗin kai”).

Ba tare da gamsuwa ba, Prause ta yi amfani da asusunta na @BrainOnPorn don ɓata wa Jonathon Van Maren suna da zarge-zargen cewa yana barazana ga mata kuma yana goyon bayan barazanar kisa. Ta kuma yi barazanar kai ƙara a shafin LifeSite News:

Abinda ke sama shine na karshe a cikin tweets goma da RealYBOP tayi a karkashin tweet na Van Maren na Gabe Deem ingantaccen bidiyo yana kiran Prause da Ley saboda dabarun rashin ɗabi'ar da aka ɗauka daga littafin Big Tobacco. Amfani da @BrainOnPorn, Anyi amfani da shafin yanar gizo na tweets guda 22 suna wulakanta Gabe, da karyata cewa Gabe ya aiko ta, da wasu mata, mutuwa da barazanar fyade (wata kara ta ɓata suna a wajen?).

Wannan bidiyon na @gabedeem , kan yadda wasu ƴan malamai ke yi wa jama'a barazana a madadin PornHub, abin kallo ne mai muhimmanci: https://t.co/9NDaU30sCJ

- Jonathon Van Maren (@JVanMaren) Agusta 25, 2020

Kamar yadda aka ambata, Prause da sunan ta (RealYBOP) sun yi wa Diana Davison haka bayan da Davison ya fallasa Prause, tare da tweets kusan 20 a cikin zaren Diana waɗanda ke ɗauke da barazana, ɓata suna, da wasiƙar C&D mai cike da ƙarya . Prause ta kasa bin diddigin C&D ɗinta mara tushe da kowace shari'a, daga ƙarshe ta goge duk tweets ɗinta. Duk haushi, duk ɓata suna, a kowane lokaci.

Prause tana aika wasiƙun C&D kamar yadda wasu mutane ke aika katunan hutu. Ta aiko min da C&D na yanar gizo 7 - duk waɗannan ba su kai ko'ina ba. Da yawa suna kan shafukan Prause da aka haɗa a cikin labarin Van Maren (duba hanyoyin haɗi zuwa sassan da ke ƙasa suna rubuta C&D da yawa waɗanda duk muka zaɓi kada mu mayar da martani). Ta aika C&D marasa tushe ga Gabe Deem, Staci Sprout, Rob Weiss, Stefanie Carnes, Linda Hatch, Alex Rhodes, mai masaukin yanar gizo na, matata, The Post Millennial , da Diana Davison, don ambato kaɗan. An yi watsi da duk waɗannan a matsayin barazanar da ba ta da amfani. Prause ba ta shigar da ƙarar ɓata suna ba; da alama inshorar alhakinta ta shafi kariya ne kawai, ba laifukan da ta yi da gangan ba.

Anan ga tsohuwar tarihin ta na C & D, wanda ba ta yi aiki da shi ba:

Yawancin C&D na Prause na baya-bayan nan an sanya musu hannu ne ta hannun Wayne B. Giampietro. A ganina, Prause ya rubuta C&D kuma Giampietro ya sanya masa hannu. Ga abin da ya fi daukar hankali: Giampietro yana ɗaya daga cikin manyan lauyoyin da ke kare Backpage.com . Gwamnatin tarayya ta rufe Backpage "saboda sauƙaƙe safarar mutane da karuwanci da gangan." (Duba wannan labarin USA Today : An bayyana tuhume-tuhume 93 kan safarar mata da aka yi wa waɗanda suka kafa Backpage ). Don ƙarin bayani game da shigar Giampietro duba: https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilndce/1:2017cv05081/341956. A wani yanayi na daban, Arizona ta kwace kadarorin Backpage.com , tare da lauyan Prause Wayne B. Giampietro LLC da aka jera a matsayin wanda ya rasa $100,000 . Shin Giampietro lauya ne na masana'antar jima'i? Me yasa zai wakilci Prause?

Anan Yi amfani da sharhi azaman GaskiyaWinsOut a ƙarƙashin labarin LifeSiteNews. Ba komai bane face karya da batanci (wata kara ta bata suna a cikin aikatawa?)

Kotuna sun yanke hukuncin cewa Prause ba ta da wata shaida ta cewa ina bin ta ( alkali ta yi watsi da umarnin hana ta na bogi kuma ta amince da bukatar SLAPP dina ). Kotun ta sha kaye, amma ta yi ikirarin nasara a shafukan yanar gizo. LOL.

updates:

Sauran - Agusta, 2020: Dangane da bidiyon Gabe Deem "Littafin Littafin batsa," @ BrainOnPorn ya buga sama da 20 na cin mutunci da raina tweets (da karyar cewa Gabe ta aiko da barazanar mutuwa da fyade)

Gabe Deem ya ba da kyakkyawan bidiyo yana kwatanta dabarun da Big Taba ke amfani da su tare da dabarun ƙawayen masana'antar batsa (misali, David Ley da Nicole Prause).

Bidiyon Gabe ya haifar da harin RealYBOP a masana'antar batsa da kuma ɓata sunan Gabe. Sami wannan - RealYBOP ta buga tweets ashirin da biyu a cikin awanni 24, suna kai hari ga Gabe. An buga wasu tweets a cikin zaren da suka kai watanni 2-3. Da yawa sun ƙunshi ɓata suna , tare da RealYBOP ta yi ƙarya cewa Gabe ya aika da barazanar mutuwa da fyaɗe. RealYBOP ta yi kamar mai son zamantakewa na gaske. Gabe yana da shekara ɗaya don yanke shawara ko yana son kai ƙara.

Ku sani cewa komai na RealYBOP tweets karya ne. Yana farawa da hauka… kuma yana da hankali.

Tweet #1

Tweet # 2 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 3 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 4 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 5 niyya Gabe (tsohuwar zaren wata 5!):

Tweet # 6 niyya Gabe da ni:

Tweet # 7 niyya Gabe da ni:

Tweet # 8 niyya Gabe (tsohuwar zaren wata 10!):

Tweet # 9 niyya Gabe (tsohuwar zaren wata 2!):

Tweet # 10 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 11 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 12 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 13 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet #14 yana nufin Gabe. Ta wallafa wasiƙu 4 a shafinta na Twitter: babu wanda ya ce komai game da Gabe yana bin kowa. Ɗaya daga cikin wasiƙun huɗun ta nuna Madita Oeming tana maimaita ƙaryar Prause cewa na bi Prause. Amma wani alkali ya riga ya yanke hukunci cewa Prause yana ƙarya, kuma ya ba ni nasarar SLAPP: An yi watsi da ƙoƙarin Prause na dakatar da Wilson; an hana umarnin hana ta a matsayin abin da ba shi da amfani kuma tana bin manyan kuɗaɗen lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP.

Tweet # 15 niyya Gabe (Gabe bai taba tara kuɗi don kowa ba);

Tweet # 16 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Babu wata kungiya da ke aiko da barazanar kisa. Ofarin ƙaryar ta.

Tweet # 17 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Ragewar: Memba na RealYBOP Alan Mckee, yana raina nofap, ya saka ƙarya ta hanyar Prause a cikin sabon littafinsa. Mckee ya yi iƙirarin cewa Nofap yana kai hari ga "masanin kimiyya mace" a zahiri (wannan ya fito ne daga Prause), duk da haka Prause ce ta aikata laifin, tana kai hari da ɓata sunan Alex Rhodes na nofap . Don haka, RealYBOP tana ambaton kanta, duk da haka kotu ta riga ta yanke hukuncin cewa ikirarinta na bin diddigin ba shi da amfani. Kokarin Prause na dakatar da Wilson ya wargaje; an hana umarnin hana ta a matsayin rashin amfani kuma tana bin manyan kuɗaɗen lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP .)

Tweet # 18 da ke niyya ga Gabe (Jonathon Van Maren yana nuna cewa babu ɗayan hotunan hotunan RealYBOP da ke goyan bayan duk abin da ta tweeted):

Tweet # 19 mai niyya ga Gabe. Yanzu da Van Maren ya fallasa RealYBOP a matsayin ƙarya, sai ta bi shi da kansa (yana hana zubar da ciki):

Tweet # 20 mai niyya Gabe.

Tweet # 21 niyya Gabe, Van Maren da ni:

Tweet # 22 mai niyya Gabe.

Tweet # 23 mai niyya Gabe.

updates:

Agusta, 2020: Don guje wa dakatarwa ta dindindin don ƙeta alamar kasuwanci, Yi amfani da suna da asusun RealYBOP na Twitter. Sabon littafinsa na karya ya ce na shigar da kararraki 7 don cire asusun Twitter na RealYBOP.

Ya ɗauki ɗan lokaci, amma yanzu ina da Rijistar Alamar Ciniki ta Amurka Lambobi 6098839, 6098840, da 6038579 don "Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa," "YourBrainOnPorn.com" da "YBOP." Domin gujewa dakatar da shi har abada ta Twitter, RealYBOP ta canza sunanta zuwa " Gaskiya Har Yanzu Kwakwalwarka akan Batsa":

Yi aiki ya canza tarihin RealYBOP, yana ƙara wannan ƙaryar:

Masana Ilimin Gaskiya. Hakikanin Bayanai. Brain On Porn yana ƙin ainihin ilimin kimiyya sosai ya gabatar da kararraki 7 don saukar da sharhinmu.

Yanzu ƙararraki 7 ne?? A zahiri, na shigar da ƙara sau ɗaya kawai (a martanin buƙatar umarnin hana aikata laifuka na bogi na Prause, kuma na yi nasara: – An yi watsi da ƙoƙarin Prause na yin shiru da Wilson; an ƙi amincewa da umarnin hana aikata laifukan a matsayin abin da ba shi da amfani kuma tana bin manyan kuɗaɗen lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP . Duk da haka, na aika da wasiƙun dakatarwa da dakatarwa da suka shafi gidan yanar gizon keta haƙƙin alamar kasuwanci www.realyourbrainonporn.com (ba asusun Twitter ba):

A ranar 1 ga Mayu, 2019 na aika C&D ga duk waɗanda suka bayyana a bayan RealYBOP (the RealYBOP “Masana”). PDF na Harare & Rubuta wasiƙa zuwa Nicole Prause (Mayu 1, 2019. a gaskiya, Daniel Burgess shi ne mai mallakar rikodi.
Da zarar an gama mallakar mallakina, sai lauyoyi na suka aika C&D zuwa Daniel Burgess (Satumba 2, 2020). PDF na wasiƙar C & D.

Har yanzu ba a shigar da kara a kotu ba game da RealYBOP ko kuma shafin Twitter. Don haka ana kama Prause a cikin wata ƙaramar ƙarya.

RealYBOP yana kuka game da canza sunansa:

Ayyuka na doka masu zuwa.

updates:

Agusta, 2020: Labaran RealYourBrainOnPorn (Faɗakarwa) ya samo asali ne daga kuskuren Brian Watson mai cike da kuskure, sa'annan ya shirya su cikin shafin Wikipedia na Nofap.

Jami'ar Kinsey, mai kula da laburare, kuma kusa da Prause, Brian Watson ya buga wani rubutu mai cike da kurakurai, wanda RealYBOP ta cire kamar gaskiya ne. RealYBOP (Prause) ta kuma ƙirƙiri wasu sabbin safa-safa na Wikipedia don gyara ƙaryar Watson a cikin shafin Nofap Wikipedia.

Gabatar da takarda Watson:

Watson ya ɓata mini suna, ya ƙaryata game da YBOP, da kuma binciken da aka gabatar a can (kamar yadda RealYBOP ke da shi):

Gaskiyar lamari: Zan fi mayar da hankali kan labaran da ba su dace ba game da labarin game da ni da gidan yanar gizo na www.yourbrainonporn.com (YBOP), amma ina ganin gyara mai faɗi ya dace (janyewa, a zahiri).

Watson bai ambaci cewa ni ne marubucin kuma abokin marubucin ba, bi da bi, na rubuta labarai guda biyu da aka yi nazari a kansu, kuma ban koyar da ilimin halittar jiki da ilimin halittar jiki tsawon shekaru ashirin ba. Kuma Watson bai ambaci cewa ni ne marubucin wani littafi mai sayarwa sosai wanda ke cike da bincike da aka yi nazari a kansu, kuma kwararru suka amince da shi: Your Brain On Porn: Internet Porn and the evocated science of addiction . A gaskiya ma, duk kudin da na samu daga littafina yana zuwa ga wata kungiyar agaji mai rijista, wanda hakan ya karyata ikirarin Watson cewa duk wanda ya ambata yana raba bayanai game da yuwuwar haɗarin batsa ta dijital don samun riba.

Maimakon bayanan da ke sama game da ni, Watson ya yi amfani da kalaman ad hominem da ake zargin suna goyon bayansu da ambato huɗu - labarai uku na asali da ɗan gajeren sharhi. Babu ɗaya daga cikin labaran huɗu da ya ƙunshi kalma game da ni, gidan yanar gizon YBOP dina, ko kuma cikakken binciken da aka tattara a can . Dangane da bayyana tsananin son zuciyar Watson , biyu daga cikin labaran huɗu an rubuta su ne ta hannun mai fafutukar batsa David Ley wanda a halin yanzu yake haɗin gwiwa da babban kamfanin batsa xHamster don tallata gidan yanar gizon sa da ayyukan sa na "Stripchat".

Watson ya bayyana yana magana ne game da Fight The New Drug (FTND) da YBOP lokacin da yake cewa:

Duk da haka, duk wani abu da ya fi bincike na wucin gadi, ya nuna cewa ƙungiyoyin suna yin wasa da rashin fahimtar bayanai da jama'a ke ɗauka. Iƙirarin da binciken da aka ambata, galibi, ba su da kyau, an tsara su da kyau, an ba su kuɗi ta hanyar zargi, an ɓatar da su, an samo su ba daidai ba, ko kuma kawai ƙarya ce kawai ( Ley 2018; Oeming 2018; Bradley et al. 2016; Mialon et al. 2012; Wéry et al. 2016; Wilt et al. 2016) . Matsalolin da ke tattare da majiyoyin za su bayyana nan take ga duk wani mai kula da laburare wanda aka horar da shi wajen kimanta albarkatu: da yawa daga cikin mujallun da aka ambata suna da taken da ake zargi, ba sa aiki, ko kuma ƙungiyoyin da aka ambata a cikin wannan labarin ne suka ba su kuɗi.

Duk da haka, Watson ko ambato masu goyan baya ba su bayar da misali guda ɗaya ba "nazarce-nazarce masu zargi ko "masu ɓatarwa" da aka buga a kan FTND ko YBOP. Kamar yadda yake a sama, babu ɗaya daga cikin ambato shida na Watson da ya ce komai game da ni ko YBOP. Kamar yadda aka saba a cikin ilimin Watson na rashin kulawa, ambato huɗu daga cikin ambato 6 ba su da alaƙa da iƙirarin Watson . Wannan zamba ce ta ilimi.

Ayyukan ambaton takardu waɗanda ba su da mahimmanci ko ba sa goyon bayan maganganun ɓatarwa ne kuma ba ya haɓaka fahimtar kimiyya ko fahimtar jama'a. Sauran takardun an sake cire su don ƙasa da ƙasa.

A gaskiya ma, shafina ya ƙunshi sama da bincike 1,000 da suka shafi amfani da batsa kai tsaye. Wannan shafin ya tsara yawancin binciken zuwa rukuni masu dacewa: Bincike Mai Mahimmanci . Misali, wannan jerin ya ƙunshi bincike 270 kan matasa da amfani da batsa (tare da bita 16 na wallafe-wallafen) - duk suna ba da rahoton sakamako mara kyau da suka shafi amfani da batsa. Iƙirarin Watson mara tallafi zai sa mai karatu ya yi imani da cewa duk 270 "nazarin zamba ne," alhali a zahiri jerin yana wakiltar fifikon binciken da marubutan da ake girmamawa suka yi a fagen.

Haka kuma, yi la'akari da jerin YBOP na kowane nazarin jijiyoyi da aka taɓa bugawa akan masu amfani da batsa . Duk da cewa duk nazarin 53 sun ba da rahoton sakamakon da ya dace da tsarin jaraba, maganganun Watson da ba su dace ba za su sa mai karatu ya yi imani da cewa duk 53 suna da kurakurai ko kuma suna da babban zargi. A wane lokaci ne gurɓataccen ilimi ke shiga cikin farfaganda mai tayar da hankali?

Ka yi la'akari da jerin YBOP na sama da bincike 110 da suka haɗa amfani da batsa ko amfani da batsa ko jarabar batsa ga rashin lafiyar jima'i da kuma rashin gamsuwar jima'i da dangantaka mai kyau . Da yawa daga cikin binciken na dogon lokaci ne ko na gwaji. Watson , wanda ke nuna cewa "kimiyyar yaudara ce" ga YBOP ta yi gargaɗi ga baƙi cewa batsa ta intanet ta yau tana haifar da rashin lafiyar jima'i a wasu masu amfani, ya kasa sanar da masu karatu cewa kusan kowane bincike mai yawa kan rahotannin maza cewa yawan amfani da batsa yana da alaƙa da rashin gamsuwar jima'i ko dangantaka. Takardu da yawa da aka yi wa bita da takwarorinsu da ƙwararru masu magana sun tayar da damuwa game da yawan amfani da batsa ta intanet da rashin lafiyar jima'i. Ana iya bayar da ƙarin misalai.

Idan aka yi la'akari da daidaiton labarin Watson , masu karatu masu ilimi za su lura da wasu kalamai daban-daban na ɓatarwa ko na ƙarya. Misali, Watson ya faɗi cikin kuskure cewa Fight The New Drug mallakar Nofap LLC. Shin irin wannan maganar ƙarya za ta iya fallasa wannan mujallar da ba ta da hankali ga shari'a saboda ɓata suna ko wasu matakan shari'a daga waɗannan kamfanoni biyu? Shin mujallar za ta iya la'akari da janyewa daga abin da ya zama kamar labarin da ba a tallafa masa sosai ba da kuma ɓata suna ga ƙungiyoyi da mutanen da Watson bai yarda da su ba bisa ga akida?

Ta amfani da sunan barkwanci, Prause ya gyara farfagandar Brian Watson a cikin shafin Wikipedia don NoFap (Ba ni da alaƙa da NoFap):

Ambato na #9 shine labarin Brian Watson . Sabbin sockpuppets guda biyu na Prause sannan suka saka sharar Watson:

An saka sunayen laƙabi (wanda aka ɗauka) a cikin shafin Nofap Wikipedia iri ɗaya da RealYBOP/Prause ta wallafa sau 5 a makon da ya gabata. (Masu ziyartar Wikipedia za su kuma ga "Tgeorgescu," wanda edita ne na dogon lokaci wanda ke kare gyare-gyaren mugunta ta hanyar sockpuppets na Prause ba tare da kunya ba):

RealYBOP a nan yana ƙirƙirar faifai yana faɗar Brian Watson, tweeting shi sau da yawa:

Misali:

Mai hankali ya mari baya? Kai ne mai hukunci. Anan ne nayi tsokaci game da nazarin dan mambobin RealYBOP Sam Perry:

Wani tweet da ke nuna batancin Brian Watson:

Kuma wani:

Abin dariya. NoFap da YBOP suna “samun kuɗi sosai”…. kamar masana'antar batsa, daidai? LOL. Anti-magana ka ce?

Kotuna ba su yarda ba. Kotun Koli ta Gundumar Los Angeles ta yanke hukunci cewa yunƙurin Prause na neman umarnin hana ni ya zama "ƙarar dabarar da ta shafi shiga cikin jama'a" (wanda aka fi sani da "ƙarar SLAPP") . Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ya yi amfani da tsarin hana ni don cin zarafi da kuma rage masa haƙƙinsa na faɗin albarkacin baki. A bisa doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wa Prause ya biya kuɗin lauya na.

RealYBOP ya sanya ƙarin bayanan farfaganda da ƙaryar Brian Watson:

Agusta 7, 2020 : Wani tweet, mai ƙarya mai tsanani, wanda zai iya zama tushen ƙararraki masu tushe daga Alex Rhodes ko FightTheNewDrug. Daga cikin sauran rashin daidaito, Watson ya yi ƙarya cewa Nofap.com mallakar FightTheNewDrug ne:

———————————————————————

Na yi imel ɗin mai zuwa ga editan mujallar. Brian Watson yana cikin yaudarar ilimi (kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin wannan imel ɗin):

Editan Edita,

Ina matukar damuwa game da rashin daidaito da yawa a cikin wannan labarin na baya-bayan nan , wasu daga cikinsu an jera su a ƙasa. Abin takaici, fannin nazarin batsa yana da rarrabuwar kawuna, kuma yana da sauƙi ga marubuta da masu bita su bar son zuciya ya mamaye hankali. Ban tabbata ba wanda ya sake duba wannan gabatarwar don mujallar ku, amma idan aka yi la'akari da kurakurai da ambato marasa dacewa a cikin rubutun, ina jin tsoron wannan rarrabuwar kawuna ya canza tsarin marubuta da bita a nan.

Zan fi mayar da hankali kan labaran karya da labarin ya yi game da ni da gidan yanar gizo na www.yourbrainonporn.com (YBOP), amma ina ganin ya kamata a yi gyara mai zurfi.

Watson bai ambaci cewa ni ne marubucin kuma abokin marubucin ba, bi da bi, na rubuta labarai guda biyu da aka yi nazari a kansu, ko kuma na koyar da ilimin halittar jiki da ilimin halittar jiki tsawon shekaru ashirin. Haka kuma Watson bai ambaci cewa ni ne marubucin wani littafi mai sayarwa wanda ya cika da bincike da aka yi nazari a kansa: Your Brain On Porn: Internet Porn and the evocated science of addiction . A gaskiya ma, duk ribar da na samu daga littafina tana zuwa ga wata ƙungiyar agaji mai rijista, wanda hakan ya karyata ikirarin Watson cewa duk wanda ya ambata yana raba bayanai game da haɗarin batsa na dijital don samun riba.

Maimakon bayanan da ke sama game da ni, Watson ya yi amfani da kalaman ad hominem da ake zargin suna goyon bayansu da ambato huɗu - labarai uku na asali da ɗan gajeren sharhi. Babu ɗaya daga cikin labaran huɗu da ya ƙunshi kalma game da ni, gidan yanar gizon YBOP dina, ko kuma cikakken binciken da aka tattara a can . Dangane da bayyana tsananin son zuciyar Watson , biyu daga cikin labaran huɗu an rubuta su ne ta hannun mai fafutukar batsa David Ley wanda a halin yanzu yake haɗin gwiwa da babban kamfanin batsa xHamster don tallata gidan yanar gizon sa da ayyukan sa na "Stripchat".

Watson ya bayyana yana magana ne game da Fight The New Drug (FTND) da YBOP lokacin da yake cewa:

Duk wani abu da ya wuce gwajin larura, duk da haka, ya nuna cewa ƙungiyoyin suna wasa cikin fahimtar ilimin jama'a game da jama'a. Abubuwan da'awar da karatun da aka ambata sune, mafi sau da yawa ba haka ba, ba a tsara su da kyau ba, ba da kuɗi ba bisa kuskure, yaudara, ba daidai ba aka samu, ko kuma kawai ƙarya ne kawai (Ley 2018; Oeming 2018; Bradley et al. 2016; Mialon et al. 2012; Wéry et al. 2016; Zai kasance et al. 2016). Matsalolin da aka samo daga kafofin zai zama bayyananne ga duk wani mai karatun laburare a kimanta kayan aiki: yawancin labaran da aka ambata suna da taken suna da shakku, ba sa aiki, ko kuma kungiyoyin da aka ambata a cikin wannan labarin sun ba su kuɗi.

Duk da haka, Watson ko ambato masu goyan baya ba su bayar da misali guda ɗaya ba "nazarin da ake zargi ko "masu ɓatarwa" da aka buga a kan FTND ko YBOP. Kamar yadda yake a sama, babu ɗaya daga cikin ambato shida na Watson da ya ce komai game da ni ko YBOP. Kamar yadda aka saba a cikin ilimin Watson na rashin kulawa, huɗu daga cikin ambato 6 ba su da alaƙa da ikirarin Watson.

Aikin ambaton takardu waɗanda ba su da mahimmanci ko kuma ba sa goyon bayan maganganu yana da damuwa, ɓatarwa ne kuma ba ya ci gaban ilimin kimiyya ko fahimtar jama'a.

A gaskiya ma, shafina ya ƙunshi sama da bincike 1,000 da suka shafi amfani da batsa kai tsaye. Wannan shafin ya tsara yawancin binciken zuwa rukuni masu dacewa: Bincike Mai Mahimmanci . Misali, wannan jerin ya ƙunshi bincike 270 kan matasa da amfani da batsa (tare da bita 16 na wallafe-wallafen) - duk suna ba da rahoton sakamako mara kyau da suka shafi amfani da batsa. Iƙirarin Watson mara tallafi zai sa mai karatu ya yi imani da cewa duk 270 "nazarin zamba ne," alhali a zahiri jerin yana wakiltar fifikon binciken da marubutan da ake girmamawa suka yi a fagen.

Haka kuma, yi la'akari da jerin YBOP na kowane nazarin jijiyoyi da aka taɓa bugawa akan masu amfani da batsa . Duk da cewa duk nazarin 52 sun ba da rahoton sakamakon da ya dace da tsarin jaraba, maganganun Watson da ba su dace ba za su sa mai karatu ya yi imani da cewa duk 52 suna da kurakurai ko kuma suna da babban zargi. A wane lokaci ne gurɓataccen ilimi ke shiga cikin farfaganda mai tayar da hankali?

Ka yi la'akari da jerin YBOP na sama da bincike 110 da suka haɗa amfani da batsa ko amfani da batsa ko jarabar batsa ga rashin lafiyar jima'i da kuma rashin gamsuwar jima'i da dangantaka mai kyau . Da yawa daga cikin binciken na dogon lokaci ne ko na gwaji. Watson , wanda ke nuna cewa "kimiyyar yaudara ce" ga YBOP ta yi gargaɗi ga baƙi cewa batsa ta intanet ta yau tana haifar da rashin lafiyar jima'i a wasu masu amfani, ya kasa sanar da masu karatu cewa kusan kowane bincike mai yawa kan rahotannin maza cewa yawan amfani da batsa yana da alaƙa da rashin gamsuwar jima'i ko dangantaka. Takardu da yawa da aka yi wa bita da takwarorinsu da ƙwararru masu magana sun tayar da damuwa game da yawan amfani da batsa ta intanet da rashin lafiyar jima'i. Ana iya bayar da ƙarin misalai.

Da na yi nazarin daidaiton labarin Watson , na lura da wasu kalamai daban-daban na ɓatarwa ko na ƙarya. Misali, Watson ya faɗi cikin kuskure cewa Fight The New Drug mallakar Nofap LLC. Shin irin wannan maganar ƙarya za ta iya fallasa mujallar ku ga shari'a saboda ɓata suna ko wasu shari'o'in shari'a daga waɗannan 'yan kasuwa biyu?

Da fatan za a sani cewa labarin Watson ya riga ya fara amfani da shi azaman kayan aikin farfaganda ta asusun Twitter na Realyourbrainonporn mai goyon bayan batsa.

Za ku iya la'akari da janyewa daga abin da ya bayyana a matsayin labarin da ba a ba shi cikakken goyon baya ba da kuma ɓatanci ga ƙungiyoyi da mutanen da Watson bai yarda da su ba bisa ga akida? Aƙalla, ina fatan za ku dage cewa Dr. Watson ya tuntuɓi duk waɗanda aka ambata a cikin labarin da nufin gyara kurakurai da yawa don amfanin masu karatun ku.

Na sa ido in ji daga wurin ku.

Gaisuwa mafi kyau,

--------------------------

updates:

Agusta, 2020, zuwa gaba: Sabbin sababbin asusu guda shida (mai yiwuwa Yi amfani da sockpuppets) shirya Shafin Wikipedia na Nofap, shigar da karairayi da yawa kwanan nan tweet by Prause & RealYBOP (yanzu Anti-YBOP).

Prause yana da dogon tarihi na ƙirƙirar safa don saka farfaganda da ƙarya a cikin shafukan Wikipedia da suka shafi batsa ( Fight The New Drug , NoFap , jarabar batsa , Tasirin batsa , MDPI , da sauransu). Bayanin Prause Wikipedia shenanigan-iceberg:

Za'a buƙaci kundin encyclopedia don yin rikodin ayyukan mugunta ta hanyar yawan sunayen Wikipedia da yawa na Prause (sockpuppets):

Lakabi guda 6 masu ƙarfin hali a cikin jerin da ke sama sun bayyana a matsayin sabbin sockpuppets na Prause waɗanda suka saka waɗannan gyare-gyaren a cikin shafin Wikipedia na Nofap. Gyaran sockpuppets suna da launin rawaya. Babban batu: Na ja layi a kan editan Wikipedia Tgeorgescu domin shi ne babban wanda ke kare gyare-gyaren Nicole Prause daga gogewa. Suna aiki a matsayin ƙungiya don ɓata suna da saka bayanan ƙarya da na ɓatarwa a cikin shafuka da yawa na Wikipedia (Nofap, FTND, Jarabawar Batsa, Tasirin Batsa, Jarabawar Jima'i, da sauransu).

A ƙasa na ba da 'yan misalai na gyare-gyaren sockpuppets a shafin Nofap:

----------

Marubucin masanin ilimin halayyar dan adam ya zabi wasu 'yan bidiyo YouTube wadanda suka fito a takaitaccen binciken "nofap". Ba wasa ba. Sannan ta zare wasu yan layi don tallafawa ajandar ta. BATA tantance Nofap ko membobinta ba. Mara amfani mara kyau:

Idan kuna da wata shakka, ga RealYBOP tweeting game da takardar cewa babu wanda zai iya samu:

-----------

Bigaramar ƙarya uku ta Prack 'sockpuppets:

1) Wasikar neman afuwa ta Roland Imhoff ba ta ce komai ba game da barazanar shari'a - domin babu ɗaya . Ga wasiƙar neman afuwa ta Imhoff - Dalilan Maza na Gujewa Yin Al'aura Ba Zai Iya Nuna Hukuncin sake kunna Yanar Gizo ba - wanda ke cewa babu ɗaya daga cikin waɗanda abin ya shafa da ke cikin NoFap (Imhoff ya ba da ra'ayi ba daidai ba a cikin bincikensa na asali cewa waɗanda abin ya shafa sun fito ne daga NoFap):

Kamar dai yadda ta yi a kan Wikipedia, Yi amfani da karyar da'awar cewa binciken Imhoff ya tattara batutuwa daga NoFap. Har wa yau Prause / RealYBOP na ci gaba da aika sakon tweet cewa karatun Imhoff yana kan membobin NoFap.

2) Labaran Scram: Duk ƙaryar da Prause ta yi. Na farko, Scram ta sami goyon bayan manyan kuɗi kuma tana da kamfanin lauyoyi da ke wakiltarta. Na biyu, Prause ta yi watsi da cewa ta bai wa ScramNews tarin ƙarya game da Alex da Nofap, wanda ya haifar da ƙarar. Na uku, babban labarin shine ƙaryar Prause ta haifar da ScramNews ta fita daga kasuwanci. Cikakken labarin anan: Kamfanin watsa labarai na ScramNews ya tilasta wa ScramNews neman afuwa da biyan diyya mai yawa saboda buga ƙaryar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes da NoFap.

3) Ta yi ikirarin cewa akwai barazanar shigar da kara daga Nofap, amma hanyar haɗin yanar gizon ba ta faɗi haka ba . Ya ƙunshi wasu tweets kaɗan daga NoFap da ke korafi game da editocin da ke jagorantar Wikipedia waɗanda ke iko da su.

-----------

Karya: Babu wanda aka yi wa barazana kuma babu wata hujja game da wannan a cikin hanyar haɗin da aka ambata.

----------

An ambaci da kuma ambaton daga sabon littafin Alan Mckee, memba na RealYBOP, ya fito. Mckee ya yi iƙirarin, ba tare da wani tallafi na halal ba, cewa Nofap ya kai hari ga "masana kimiyya mata." Wannan a bayyane yake ya fito ne daga Prause , duk da haka Prause ne ya aikata laifin, yana kai hari da ɓata sunan Alex Rhodes na NoFap, da sauransu da yawa.

A 'yan kwanakin da suka gabata RealYBOP ta wallafa sakonnin karyar da ta ciyar da Alan Mckee (kuma daga baya aka sanya a Wikipedia).

Yadda ake kera furofaganda.

---------------

Da yake ambaton takardar wanda marubucin ya saurari wasu randoman bidiyon YouTube da ke ambaton NoFap kuma ya yanke hukunci game da waɗanda ke barin batsa.

Bugu da ƙari, Yi amfani da matsayin RealYBOP tweeting da takarda daga baya ta shirya cikin Wikipedia. Tweeter duk karya ne. Babu wani abu a cikin takarda game da misogyny ko liwadi. Ta ambaci maganata na TEDx a wucewa. Shi ke nan.

Ko ta yaya, takardar ta kasance rikici ne daga masanin ilimin zamantakewar al'umma wanda a hankali ya zaɓi wasu 'yan maganganu da bidiyo na YouTube don tallafawa ƙaddarar da aka zaɓa na raina maza don dawowa.

---------

A nan wani ya ambaci labarin VICE mai cike da ƙarya wanda ke nuna Prause, David Ley, PornHub da wakilan Xhamster. (Lura: David Ley yanzu yana haɗin gwiwa da XHamster don tallata gidajen yanar gizon sa kuma Pornhub shine asusun farko da ya sake buga tweet ɗin RealYBOP na farko .)

Yana da daɗi ƙwarai. Duba Shin Masana'antar Batsa Ta Shafi Nicole Prause?

--------------

An tattauna batun Brian Watson mai cike da kurakurai a cikin wannan sashe: Agusta, 2020: Rubuce-rubucen RealYourBrainOnPorn (Prause) sun yi ƙarya daga rubutun Brian Watson mai cike da kurakurai. Sannan Prause ya gyara ƙaryar Watson zuwa shafin Nofap Wikipedia.

RealYBOP ya wallafa wannan kalaman na batanci akalla sau 20 a cikin sati 3.

---------

Ya sake ambata Kinsey grad Brian Watson, amma karya ne. NoFap ba ta taɓa neman ko karɓar kuɗi daga “ƙungiyoyin addinai” ba.

Labarin Watson cike yake da labaran karya kuma ambaton nasa bai fadi abin da yake ikirarin suna yi ba. Wannan lamari ne na yaudarar ilimi, bayyananne kuma mai sauki.

---------

Liesarin ƙarya daga kuskuren Brian Watson. A cikin wannan mai ba da labarin, Watson ya yi da'awar ƙarya cewa ƙarar da Alex Rhodes ya ɓata sunan Nicole Prause yana da hannu sosai daga NCOSE da Mormon Church.

--------

Ƙarin ƙarya. Sockpuppet na Prause ya yi iƙirarin cewa NoFap ta yi barazanar kai ƙarar The Spectator . Yayin da The Spectator ta maimaita ƙaryar da Prause ya ƙirƙira, NoFap bai taɓa yin barazanar kai ƙara ba. A nan za ku iya karanta wasiƙar NoFap da editan ya yarda ya gyara kurakuran marubutan: https://web.archive.org/web/20210104022332/https://spectator.us/nofap-proud-boys/

Prause da RealYBOP sun yi ta wallafa sau da yawa cewa Alex Rhodes da Nofap suna da ƙungiyoyi (ko kuma Nofap yana samun goyon bayan Proud Boys). Wannan yana ɗaya daga cikin misalan ɓatanci da aka bayyana a cikin ƙarar Rhodes game da Prause: Wanda ya kafa NoFap Alexander Rhodes ya shigar da ƙarar ɓatanci ga Nicole Prause / Liberos.

Duk da cewa an dakatar da asusunta na @BrainOnPorn na tsawon mako guda saboda cin zarafi, Nikky ta ƙirƙiri sabuwar 'yar tsana don saka ƙarya - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Faustinecliffwalker

---------

Bayan an dakatar da asusun Twitter na masana'antar batsa na Prause (@BrainOnPorn) har abada saboda cin zarafi da cin zarafi da aka yi niyya, ta ƙirƙiri wani safa na 5 don ƙara farfaganda - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NeTAbygO

----------

Disamba 10, 2020: Wani gyaran gyaran sockpuppet na Prause mai yiwuwa Nofap - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JackReacher2018.

Gyaran ya saka ambato mara ma'ana e:

---------

Abin da ke sama kawai shine ƙarshen Prause icberg idan ana maganar rashin gaskiya game da Alex Rhodes da Nofap: Nicole Prause, David Ley & @BrainOnPorn dogon tarihin cin zarafi da ɓata sunan Alexander Rhodes na NoFap

Sauran - Agusta, 2020: RealYBOP ta ce tara kudin DJ Burr don kaninsa mai shekaru 14 da ke tsare ya zama zamba. Da ƙarya ya zargi Burr da sa ido, ya ce ya kamata ya haɗu da ɗan'uwansa a kurkuku.

Prause ta ci zarafin DJ Burr mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali a baya - har ma ta kai rahotonsa ga Ma'aikatar Lafiya ta Jihar Washington saboda jajircewarsa wajen kare ta a shafin Twitter. Amma sabon harin da Prause ta kai ya wuce gona da iri.

RealYBOP ta ce yunƙurin DJ Burr na tallafawa ɗan'uwansa ɗan shekara 14 wanda hukumomi ke zaluntarsa, ya zama yaudara. Ita irin wannan maƙaryaciyar ce - babu wanda ya tsoratar da kowa. Shigar da NCOSE abu ne mai ban mamaki kamar yadda DJ bashi da alaƙa da NCOSE (bai taɓa magana a wurin ba, babu komai…).

Labarin baya daga DJ. Ɗaya daga cikin wasu sakonnin Twitter da aka wallafa:

DJ ya kafa wani gidauniyar tara kuɗi don kare haƙƙin ɗan'uwansa :

Boyewa da tsoro don zama sunan laƙabarta, Fuskantarwa ta haɓaka, ɓata sunan DJ, da'awar cewa yana da hannu tare da neman jiki da barazanar mutuwa. Sannan tana yiwa DJ barazana.

Mugu, kawai kash.

RealYBOP ta zargi da yawa daga cikinmu da yin barazana ko kuma aika musu da barazanar kisa. Karya ce da take so, ta maimaita ta.

Ga abin da ke faruwa: Prause ta zarge ni da bin diddigi, don haka na shigar da ƙara a kanta - kuma na yi nasara, na tabbatar da cewa Prause ita ce mai laifin, ba wanda aka zalunta ba - ƙoƙarin Prause na yin shiru da Wilson ya gaza; an hana ta umarnin hana ta a matsayin abin da ba shi da amfani kuma tana bin manyan kuɗaɗen lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP.

Lura: Wannan wani misali ne na Prause da ke shiga cikin tsoratar da shaidu yayin da DJ Burr ya bayar da rantsuwar rantsuwa don ƙarar ɓata suna da Alex Rhodes ya shigar a kanta - Nuni na 6: DJ Burr, rantsuwar LHMC (shafuka 2).

updates:

Agusta, 2020: Yi amfani da fatarar fayiloli don tsere wa abin alhaki don 3 har yanzu ba a yi kokarin gurfanar da karar batanci ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc), kuma ku guji biyan ni bashin lauyan-bashin da ta jawo (a cikin Anti-SLAPP nasara)

Kamar yadda aka faɗa a wani wuri, a ranar 6 ga Agusta, 2020, Kotun Koli ta California ta yi watsi da buƙatar hana ni yin lalata da Prause ta yi kuma ta amince da buƙatar da na gabatar na hana SLAPP . A bisa doka, asarar na nufin cewa Prause za ta biya kuɗin lauyana (kimanin dala $40,000) da zarar alkali ya albarkaci takardun ainihin adadin bashin. Mako guda ko makamancin haka, an shirya Prause da abokin aikinta Greg Siegle su bayar da bayanansu a shari'ar ɓata suna da Alex Rhodes ya shigar a kan Prause. Haka kuma, an aika wa Twitter sammaci, kuma za ta miƙa wa Rhodes asalin asusun Twitter na @BrainOnPorn (wanda a bayyane yake gidan mafi munin ɓata suna na Prause).

Sai kuma, a ranar 18 ga Agusta, 2020 - kwana ɗaya kafin a fara gabatar da ƙarar farko - Prause ta shigar da ƙarar fatara . Ta yi haka ne don guje wa biyan ni bashin kuɗin lauya da ta ci, da kuma ƙoƙarin tserewa daga dukkan ƙara uku na bata suna da aka shigar mata: Donald L. Hilton Jr v. Nicole Prause da Liberos LLC , Lambar Shari'a: SA: 19-CV-00755-OLG; Alexander Rhodes v. Nicole Prause da Liberos LLC , Lambar Shari'a 2:19-CV-01366-MPK; da Aaron M. Minc, Esq v. Melissa A. Farmer da Nicole R. Prause , Lambar Shari'a: CV-20-937026.

LURA: Na ƙirƙiri wannan sashe a watan Disamba na 2020, watanni huɗu bayan da Prause ta shigar da ƙarar fatarar kuɗi. Prause ba ta bar ni da wani zaɓi ba, kamar yadda ta yi iƙirarin a shafinta na Twitter cewa cire bashin kuɗin lauyanta da aka yi da fatarar kuɗi mai ban mamaki yana nufin an "yi watsi da nasarar da na samu a kan SLAPP." A ranar 4 ga Disamba, ta amsa wani dogon zare na tsawon watanni 2 da ya bayyana yana da'awar ƙarya cewa (1) an yi watsi da ƙarar ɓatanci ta Hilton da Rhodes, kuma (2) an soke nasarar da na samu a kan SLAP (dukansu ƙarya ne):

Nasarar da na samu a shari'a ta tsaya cak . Babu abin da aka mayar da martani: Buƙatar da aka yi wa Prause na yin odar hana shi ta zamba ta ci gaba da wanzuwa (ba ta da wani amfani), kamar yadda hukuncin da aka yanke mini na Anti-SLAPP ya nuna. An yi wa Prause shan kaye a shari'a mai ban mamaki, kuma babu abin da ya canza hakan.

Ku sani, Prause ba ta da wani kaso na kaso . Kawai ta zuba mafi yawan kadarorinta a cikin asusun ritayarta (fiye da kwata na dala miliyan ɗaya), kuma ta lissafa ƙaramin bashin mabukaci (ƙasa da dala $3,000). Iƙirarinta na rashin kaso ya dogara ne kawai akan wasu basussukan da za a iya bin ta daga ƙarar bata suna da ke sama (waɗanda ƙila ba a taɓa yi musu shari'a ba), da kuma wasu dala $40 da za ta ci bashina idan alkali ya albarkaci adadin.

Domin cimma "rashin biyan kuɗi," takardun fatarar Prause sun yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa tana bin ni bashin $100,000 (maimakon $40,000), kuma cewa alhakin shari'ar Hilton da Rhodes ya kai dala $150,000 (lokacin da ba ta bin su komai ba tukuna). Amma fa game da kuɗaɗen shari'a na Prause, za ku tambaya? Shin ba za su taimaka wajen fatattakar ta ba? Da alama babu ɗaya, domin kamfanin inshorarta yana biyan duk kuɗaɗen shari'a a cikin ƙarar ɓata suna!

Abubuwan da aka lalata suna da tsada ba a amfani da komai, yayin da Alex Rhodes Don Hilton ya kashe kuɗi mai yawa don shawo kan magungunan doka don yin amfani da lalata da zalunci na Prause. A takaice, ainihin bashin da aka yi wa Prause, gami da abin da ta binta, bai kai $ 50K ba, yayin da dukiyarta ta kasance sama da $ 250K. Ba tare da kalubale ba, fatarar kuɗi ya ba da izinin yin amfani da shi don kauce wa adalci, don zubar da jinin waɗanda ke hannun kuɗi ta hanyar kuɗin doka, da kuma ci gaba da ɓata musu suna da musguna musu ba tare da wata iyaka ko sakamako ba.

Tare da kashe kuɗaɗenta, Fuskantarwa tana jan ƙararraki, yayin da Rhodes, Hilton & Minc suka kashe babban $$$. Anan, alƙali ɗaya yayi gargaɗi Yin amfani da ladabi da ladabi:

Ara wa farashin da suke ƙaruwa, Rhodes, Hilton da Minc suna adawa da Amincewa da shigar da ƙararrakin cin mutuncin su. A yadda aka saba, ganganci da kuma mummunan aiki (kamar aikin "sarautar ta'addanci" na Prause ta lalata rayuwar mutane tare da ɓata suna da rahotanni marasa tushe) ba za a fitar da su ba. Koyaya, alƙalai na iya samun ƙarshen sandar wani lokacin. Ina tsammanin wannan shine dalilin da ya sa akwai tsarin roko.

Bugu da ƙari, Yi amfani da jinkirta ganowa kuma ya ɓatar da kowa har zuwa daren da za a tumɓuke ta, sannan ta shigar da fatarar kuɗi. Wadannan bayanan doka da Hilton & Rhodes suka gabatar sun nuna cewa Prause ta shigar da fatarar kuɗi don gujewa saukewa da kuma ba da takardu. Me take boyewa?

An ɗauko daga takardar shigar da ƙarar Alex Rhodes ga 'yan adawa :

An ɗauko daga sharhin masu adawa da Don Hilton g:

Za ka yi tunanin cewa fatara za ta rage yawan ɓata suna da cin zarafi da cin zarafi da Prause ke yi. Akasin haka ne, yayin da ɓata suna da cin zarafi da sunan @BrainOnPorn ya yi ta ƙaruwa sosai, inda ya kai hari ga Hilton, Rhodes, Wilson da sauran waɗanda suka shigar da ƙara a cikin ƙarar ɓata suna ta Hilton & Rhodes. @BrainOnPorn ya kai hari ga ɓangarorin da ke cikin ƙarar ɓata suna da tweets har zuwa 170 masu ɓata suna da kuma ɓata suna a kowace rana!

Shafuka masu zuwa:

Agusta, 2020: Takaddun fatarar kuɗi na Prause sun ƙaryata labarin da take yawan maimaitawa cewa ta sauya gidanta “sau da yawa” saboda ana neman ta (da farko Gary Wilson, ba shakka).

A cikin sakonnin Twitter, hirarraki, labarai, da takardun kotu, Prause ta yi ta ikirarin cewa tana motsawa koyaushe saboda yawan masu bin diddiginta suna numfashi a wuyanta (musamman ni). Duk waɗannan maganganun ƙarya ne. Kusan shekaru 8 Prause ta yi ta sukar wannan ikirarin, amma ba ta bayar da takardu da yawa da ke goyon bayan hakan ba. A ƙarshe, ita da kanta ta shigar da wata sanarwa a bainar jama'a (a ƙasa) wacce ta saba wa maganganun ƙarya da ta yi a baya game da ƙaura.

Kiranta da ta yi wa Alex Rhodes mai neman mafaka na ɗaya daga cikin dalilan da ya sa yake kai ƙararta kan ɓata suna: An shigar da ƙarar cin zarafi ga wanda ya kafa NoFap, Alexander Rhodes, a kan Nicole Prause / Liberos LLC.

Ni dai, Prause ta wallafa ɗaruruwan tsokaci da tweets da ke ikirarin cewa na bi ta a zahiri (an taƙaita a sashe na farko na shafi na #1 ). (Ina zaune a wata jiha, ɗaruruwan mil daga nan kuma ba mai bin diddigi ba ne.) Kamar yadda aka saba, Prause ba ta bayar da wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan wannan ƙaryar ba. Wa ke buƙatar shaida lokacin da za ku iya yin ƙarya a ƙarƙashin rantsuwa, kamar yadda ta yi a cikin takardun kotu a cikin ƙarar batanci da Hilton ta shigar a kanta ? A cikin shigar da ta yi a watan Agusta, 2019, Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa ta ƙaura a ranar 1 ga Yuli, 2019 "saboda tsoron bin diddigin Wilson" (lura da ranar):

A cikin wannan watan Agusta, 2019, shigar da ƙarar kotu, David Ley ya maimaita maganar banza ta Prause a cikin rantsuwar rantsuwa (bayanin kula - "sau da yawa"):

A cikin yunƙurin da ta yi na rashin nasara a wani umarni na hana ta , Prause ta yi ƙarya cewa "sakamakon ayyukan Gary Wilson, na ƙaura sau da yawa".

Kamar yadda yake a cikin takardun da aka shigar a kotun Hilton, takardar da Prause ta bayar don umarnin hana ta ba ta ƙunshi wata shaida da ke nuna cewa ta taɓa ƙaura da gidanta ba, balle ma ta ƙaura saboda ni. Zai yi sauƙi a samar da rasit ko hayar gida, duk da haka Prause ta kasa yin hakan. Ba abin mamaki ba ne, domin ba ta taɓa bayar da shaida mai ma'ana don tallafawa iƙirarinta ba . Ba abin mamaki ba ne cewa alƙali ya yanke hukuncin cewa "ba za a yarda da ita ba" mafi yawan sanarwarta don tallafawa buƙatar umarnin hana ta.

A ƙarshe ta bayyana gaskiya a cikin takardar neman fatarar da ta shigar a watan Agusta, 2020. Ta shigar da ita ne domin guje wa ɗaukar alhakin ƙarar ɓata suna guda 3 da ba a yi musu ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc), kuma ta guji biyan ni bashin kuɗin lauya da ta ci (Prause ba a zahiri ya lalace ba, kamar yadda ta bayar da rahoton ~$270,000 a cikin tanadi). Wannan hoton bidiyon shigar da ƙarar fatarar da ta yi ya nuna cewa Prause ba ta motsa ba a cikin shekaru 3 da suka gabata:

Me yasa Karshe ta bayyana gaskiya a cikin fatararta da tayi wanda a da, a zahiri, bata matsar da gidanta ko kasuwancin ta saboda tsangwama? Da kyau, a cikin takaddar dole ne ta samar da kowane irin ingantaccen takardun kuɗi da na sirri ga kotun fatarar kuɗi. Idan tatsuniyarta ta motsi koyaushe bai dace da takaddun nata ba, ana iya tuhumar ta da shaidar zur. Sabanin haka, babu wani tsarin da aka yi don bincika-Tabbatar da Shari'a a cikin karar Hilton ko a rigar adawa ta SLAPP, don haka ta sami damar yin kwance ba tare da hukunci ba.

Satumba, 2020: Don kaucewa take hakkin kasuwanci "Da gaske har yanzu kwakwalwarka a kan batsa" ta canza suna zuwa "Anti-Brain On Porn." Yi aiki a hukumance yana gudanar da asusun mai sa ido (ɓatanci da tsananta ni da iyalina, amma faɗin komi game da YBOP).

Bayan samun alamun kasuwanci na USPTO don YBOP da YourBrainOnPorn mun sanar da twitter cewa @BrainOnPorn ya tsunduma cikin keta dokar kasuwanci. @BrainOnPorn ya amsa da tweets da yawa masu ikirarin cin zarafi, yayin da suka canza sunanta a kokarin bin doka. Misali:

Ba da daɗewa ba bayan haka, @BrainOnPorn (Asusun Twitter na alter-ego na Prause) ya yi ƙoƙarin sake suna asusun sharhi kan YBOP, amma ba tare da yin tsokaci kan abubuwan da ke cikin YBOP ba! Madadin haka, Prause ta yi amfani da Anti-Your Brain On Porn ( @BrainOnPorn ) kawai don ɓata suna da ƙarya game da mutane da ƙungiyoyi daban-daban (kimanin irin waɗannan tweets 1,000 a cikin watanni 16 na farko na wanzuwarsa ). Bai bayar da wani sharhi ko bincike na gaske ba.

Dangane da sabon manufarsa, tarihin rayuwar @BrainOnPorn ya goge "masana kimiyya na gaske" da "bayanai na gaske." RealYBOP ma tana cikin tarihin rayuwarta, tana da'awar ƙarya cewa na yi barazanar kai "mu" ƙara sau 7 :

Gaskiyar magana? Na aika da wasiƙar dakatarwa da dakatarwa guda ɗaya kawai, mai kyau ga Prause da sauran ƙwararrun RealYBOP (Mayu, 2019). Bayan da shari'o'in shari'a suka nuna cewa Daniel Burgess shine mamallakin URL ɗin realyourbrainonporn.com, na aika masa da wasiƙar C&D daban (Yuli, 2019). An yi watsi da duk wasiƙun kuma/ko an yi musu ba'a. Bayan na kammala mallakar alamun kasuwanci na USPTO (YBOP, yourbrainonporn, yourbrainonporn.com) lauyoyina sun aika wa Burgess wasiƙar C&D ta biyu a ranar 2 ga Satumba, 2020 ( PDF na wasiƙar C&D ). A taƙaice, na aika wasiƙun dakatarwa da dakatarwa na hukuma na Burgess 2 kawai, waɗanda suka shafi URL ɗin da ke keta alamar kasuwanci realyourbrainonporn.com (wanda Burgess ke mallaka), ba kai tsaye zuwa asusun Twitter mai alaƙa da @BrainOnPorn ba.

Abin sha'awa, kwanaki kaɗan bayan wannan C&D na biyu, www.realyourbrainonporn.com ya ɓace ba zato ba tsammani daga yanar gizo. Asusun Twitter na Anti-YBOP (@BrainOnPorn) ya cire hanyar haɗin yanar gizon da aka yi watsi da shi, ya maye gurbinsa da hanyar haɗi zuwa www.scienceofarousal.com.

Yana da muhimmanci a lura cewa mutumin da ke kula da asusun @BrainOnPorn (Nicole Prause) an dakatar da shi daga Twitter har abada saboda cin zarafi a watan Oktoba, 2015 ( @NicolePrause ). Tun daga lokacin, an ba ta izinin ƙirƙirar sabbin asusu guda biyu waɗanda suka saɓa wa ƙa'idodin hana gujewa Twitter: @NicoleRPrause da @BrainOnPorn. Me yasa Twitter bai aiwatar da ƙa'idodinsa game da wannan mutumin ba?

Bugu da ƙari, kwanan nan na yi nasara a shari'ar da aka shigar kan Nicole Prause game da SLAPP , inda aka tabbatar da cewa tana cin zarafin ni da iyalina. Domin alkali ya yanke hukunci a kaina, alkali ya yanke hukunci cewa buƙatar umarnin hana Prause ba ta da amfani (1) ba ta da goyon baya da kuma (2) yunƙurin danne haƙƙina na yin magana game da wani abu da ya shafi jama'a. Nicole Prause (wanda aka dakatar da asusun farko nata har abada saboda cin zarafi) sai ta yi amfani da asusunta na @BrainOnPorn don bin diddigin ni da iyalina (da kuma wasu). Duk muna damuwa da tsaronmu.

Kafin a yi min horo ta Twitter ( duba ƙasa ), @BrainOnPorn ya yi matsakaicin tweets 10-20 a kowace rana yana ɓata min suna, iyalina, abokaina da sauransu. Gabaɗaya, @BrainOnPorn ya buga kusan tweets 1,00 da ke niyya (yawancinsu ɓata suna ne, duk talla ne ). Tweets da yawa da ba za a iya rubutawa a wannan shafin ba. Mafi mahimmanci, na ƙi in zana abokaina, iyalina da magoya bayana a cikin ƙarya ta hanyar sake buga ƙaryar Prause. Duk da haka, zan ba da wasu misalai don ba ku ɗanɗano dabarun Prause masu banƙyama.

Kamar yadda aka faɗa a sama, bayan na kammala rajistar alamun kasuwanci na USPTO (YBOP, yourbrainonporn, yourbrainonporn.com) lauyoyina sun aika wa Burgess wasiƙar C&D ta biyu a ranar 2 ga Satumba, 2020 ( PDF na wasiƙar C&D ). Anti-YBOP gaba ɗaya ta yi ƙarya game da abubuwan da suka faru, suna da'awar cewa na "bi diddigin" Burgess da iyalinsa (waɗanda ke zaune a Utah). Duk da haka C&D ga Burgess ya shafi gidan yanar gizon RealYBOP, wanda ya cire nan da nan, ba asusun Twitter ba. Ba a sanar da tilasta bin doka ba. Matata ba ta da wadata kuma ba ta da gado. Mugunta:

--------

Yin wa ɗana da mahaifiyarsa addu'a (wanda Prause ta ci gaba da yi a cikin tweets sama da 80) , gami da sunayensu, hotunansu na sirri, adiresoshinsu, wuraren aiki, da bayanan kuɗi. Misali, Prause ta yi wa mahaifiyar ɗana sharri a matsayin "mahaifiyar Wilson." Wannan tweet ɗin cike yake da ƙarya:

Ba ta ma'amala da tukunya ba, amma ta ƙirƙiri kasuwanci mai nasara a cikin kayayyakin CBD na CBD da kayan THC don ciwo mai tsanani, ciwon daji, MS, da kuma wasu yanayi masu yawa (wannan ya kasance doka ta yi shekaru 2 a Oregon) Ta fara kasuwancin ne bayan mun bi ta hanyoyinmu daban. Ban sami kobo daga gare ta ba (me yasa zan iya?). Ko da muna da aure, har yanzu ba zai zama rikici na sha'awa a gare ni in rubuta game da tasirin amfani da batsa ba. Yana da hauka ga Prause don da'awar cewa na ƙirƙiri YBOP don ɓoye gaskiyar cewa tsoho na yana da kasuwancin da ya ci nasara. Amma wannan Nikky ne a gare ku.

---------

Duk karya. Kuna iya fada saboda ba ta ba da hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na na sanya hotuna ba, ko wani abu.

An rubuta wasiƙu huɗu da aka bayyana a sama don yunƙurin yaudara na Prause na hana wani hukunci da aka yi watsi da shi wanda ba shi da wani amfani, kuma dangane da hakan aka ba ni nasarar SLAPP: Kokarin Prause na dakatar da Wilson ya gaza; an ƙi umarnin hana ta a matsayin wanda ba shi da wani amfani kuma tana bin manyan kuɗaɗen lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP.

Marubutan 4 abokai ne na kut da kut da kuma tsara abubuwan da aka tsara. An tallata uku daga cikin huɗu tare da gidan yanar gizon RealYBOP. Babu ɗaya daga cikin marubutan wasiƙar da ya ce na bi su. Haruffan da ba a shafa ba suna dauke da ainihin ainihin sifili don tallafawa da'awarta. Takaitaccen bayani game da haruffa 4 An gabatar da shi kuma anyi kuskuren gabatarwa a cikin tweets dayawa:

Ta memba na RealYBOP Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da ya faɗi game da ni ko Yin wasa.
Daga Rebecca Sullivan ta Kanada. Wasikar mai shafi 2 tana da layin amai guda daya game da ni, tana cewa na kawo takaitaccen bayani kan Motion na Kanada 47. Babu wani abu kuma.
Ta memba na RealYBOP Madita Oeming. Ba ta taɓa da'awar cewa na sa mata ido ko yi mata barazana ta kowace hanya ba. Madadin haka, Oeming yayi kuka saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da tallafi da'awarta. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita karairayin Prause… amma ba tare da wata shaida ba.
Wasikar karshe itace tatsuniya mai cike da karya ta Daniel Burgess, wanda ya mallaki URL na RealYBOP, yayi amfani da laƙabi don yin magana da ni, kuma yana da kansa tsunduma cikin yanayi da yawa na bata suna. Gaskiya game da Burgess da ma'amalar mu shine sosai rubuce a wannan shafin. Ayyukan doka suna ci gaba da Mista Burgess, gami da magance tweets na kwanan nan (duba ƙasa) wanda ya zarge ni da aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa da bin mata 5. Duk maganganun da aka rubuta sau da yawa a Twitter sun zama bata suna ta hanyar, wanda shine mafi sauki irin na bata suna don samun sassauci a cikin kararrakin bata suna.

Wani rubutu mai ban haushi da ke tare da wasiƙun, waɗanda lauyanta ya ƙi amincewa da su a matsayin shaida dangane da gazawar umarnin hana ta (lauyan nata ya nemi ya janye saboda a bayyane yake tana yi masa barazana da ƙara saboda bai yarda ya yi mata tayin ba ):

Babu ɗaya daga cikin wasiƙun da ya ce komai game da neman jami'an tsaro saboda kowane dalili. Ba ni da "ƙungiya" - kawai na rubuta littafi mai daraja. Ban taɓa ƙoƙarin korar kowa ba. Prause maƙaryaci ne mai cutarwa. Akwai ɗaruruwan mutane kamar waɗannan (sau da yawa mafi muni), inda da yawa yanzu ke kai hari ga ɗana, mahaifiyarsa, da matata. Abin takaici ne a sake buga shi a nan.

A taƙaice - Prause ta daina ɓoyewa a bayan ruɗani cewa @BrainOnPorn Twitter ba komai bane illa asusun batsa, wanda aka ƙirƙira don yaudarar jama'a, da kuma yin amfani da yanar gizo don yi mini tambayoyi game da illolin batsa ko wasu abubuwan da ba su dace ba na masana'antar batsa (kamar masu yin wasan kwaikwayo na batsa marasa shekaru, cin zarafin waɗanda aka yi wa fyaɗe, da fataucin mutane). Ta kowace hanya, Nicole Prause da asusunta na @BrainOnPorn sun karya manufofin Twitter da yawa.

updates:

Sauran - Satumba, 2020: Aaron Minc, JD ya ba da sanarwar ƙarar da ya ɓata sunan Prause (Minc ya mallaki kamfanin lauya mai wakiltar Alex Rhodes).

A ranar 9 ga Satumba, 2020 Aaron Minc, JD ta shigar da ƙarar batanci ga Melissa Farmer saboda sake wallafa sakonnin batanci da Nicole Prause ta rubuta. A cikin sakonnin da ta wallafa, Farmer “ ta aika saƙonni kai tsaye da/ko ta raba su da Ƙungiyar Lauyoyi ta Jihar Ohio, Ƙungiyar Lauyoyi ta Cleveland Metropolitan, da kuma asusun twitter na Kotun Koli ta Ohio. ” Farmer ta yi iƙirarin cewa Aaron Minc yana “ shiga cikin keta haƙƙin ɗabi'a wanda ke barazana ga wani ɓangare na uku (Dokar Dokokin Ɗabi'ar Farfesa ta Ohio ta 4.4.). ”

A cikin shigar da kara a kotu, Minc ya ce zai kara Fada a cikin shari'ar bata sunan Melissa Farmer idan da kuma lokacin da Kotun Fatarar Kuka ta ba shi dama ("saukake daga zama"):

Nicole R. Prause mazaunin California ne. Yi aiki yana aiki da asusu akan Twitter tare da sunan mai amfani "Liberos" da / ko "@NieoleRPrause." Yi gabatar da kara don fatarar kuɗi a ranar 18 ga Agusta, 2020 a ƙarƙashin Fasali na 7 na Dokar Fatarar Kuɗi ta Amurka a Kotun Fatarar Kuɗi ta Amurka na Babban Gundumar California, Shari'a Mai lamba 2: 20-bk-17828-NB. Mai shigar da kara yana cikin shirin neman izini daga Kotun Fatarar Kujera don shigar da ita a matsayin wacce ake kara a wannan kara.

Filin guda biyu da Aaron Minc yayi:

Bari mu fara da sakonnin Prause guda biyu da suka sa aka shigar da ƙarar bata suna a karo na uku cikin ƙasa da shekaru 2. Sakon na biyu (wanda yanzu aka goge), ya bayyana cewa Aaron Minc (@RepLawyer) ya aika wurin Prause zuwa ga wata ƙungiya da ba a san sunanta ba wadda ta yi iƙirarin cewa tana shirin kashe ta. Mabiyanta masu sha'awar sun yi ta maimaita ikirarinta marasa goyon baya (ba ta taɓa bayar da hotunan kariyar kwamfuta ba):

Ta sake yin iƙirarin cewa "barazanar" ta tilasta mata komawa mazaunanta da kuma "lab." Wannan bai dace da takaddun fatararta na watan Agusta, 2020 ba inda ta bayyana, a ƙarƙashin hukuncin rantsuwa, cewa ta kasance a wuri ɗaya tsawon shekaru 3 ɗin da suka gabata.

Tatsuniyoyinta na da hankali koyaushe suna motsawa saboda tsananin 'bugu' 'ya farfashe.

Ga wani ɓangare na ainihin zaren Prause da kuma wasu daga cikin amsoshin Minc:

Imel ɗin da Prause ya wallafa a shafinsa na Twitter wasiƙa ce ta sirri daga lauyan Alex Rhodes (Andrew Stebbins na Minc Law) zuwa ga lauyan Prause (Phillip J. Sbrolla):

Wannan imel ɗin ba jama'a ba ne, kuma ba a aika shi zuwa kowane “rukuni” ba. Hankula na yau da kullun dabaru na hotunan kariyar allo wanda bashi da wata alaka da ikirarin ta.

Tare da sycophants ɗinta suna ci gaba, Prause ya bayyana yana cewa tana ƙarar Aaron Minc (ba ita ba):

Ta ci gaba da magana, tana cewa masu binciken LAPD "suna ganin wannan na iya yi." Ka lura da yadda Masu amfani da cikakken saye suke saya cikin labarin ƙarya na Prause.

She contiunes tayi ikirarin cewa "jami'in bincike ne mai kyan gani" da zai iya aiki akan wadannan. Abin da "waɗannan" ba wanda ya sani, kamar yadda ba ta ba da misalai na komai ba, sai dai don imel na sirri na watanni 8 tsakanin lauyoyi.

Idan da ace ina da dala a duk lokacin da Shari'a tayi ikirarin FBI ko LADP suna shirin kame - kuma ba haka bane.

Tweets na tweets ya ba wasu damar bin Aaron Minc:

A ƙarshe, an zuga Melissa Farmer, wacce ake kyautata zaton ta shiga cikin wannan wasan kwaikwayo na Prause, ta yi amfani da shafin Twitter. Har ma ta yi wa ƙungiyoyin lauyoyi daban-daban alama kuma ta zargi Minc da aikata " keta haddin ɗabi'a da ke barazana ga wani ɓangare na uku " (wanda aka ɗauko daga shigar da Minc):

Ba zai taɓa mamakin yadda mutane ba tare da jinkiri ba suke sake faɗar da'awar ba tare da damuwa da bincika gaskiyar ba ko neman goyon bayan shaida.

Ga hotunan allo na shafuka 1 zuwa 5 na korafin Aaron Minc game da bata suna da kuma bayanan karya :

Page #1

Page #2

Page #3

Page #4

Page #5

Ƙara wannan zuwa jerin dogon yunƙurin lalata ayyuka na Prause: Mutane da yawa da suka rasa rayukansu sakamakon Rahoton Mugunta na Nicole Prause da Amfani da Tsarin Mugunta.

Satumba, 2020: Anti-YBOP / @ BrainOnPorn (Prause) wanda Twitter ta hore da zagi da cin zarafin ni da wasu

Asusun @BrainOnPorn na Nicole Prause ya yi iƙirarin cewa "sharhi ne" akan Brain On Porn. Madadin haka, yana bin ni (da wasu) da kaina, kuma ba ya yin tsokaci akan Brain On Porn ( gidan yanar gizo ko littafi ). A zahiri, ba "Anti-YourBrainOnPorn" ba ne, kuma don haka yana amfani da alamun kasuwanci na ba tare da hujja ba don yin sharhi akan Brain On Porn.

Yayin da yake bayyana a matsayin "sharhi," @BrainOnPorn da gaske yana shiga cikin niyya niyya ni da iyalina (da dangi), da abokai. Dokokin Twitter da bayanai dalla-dalla sun ce masu zuwa:

Cin zarafi/cin zarafi: Ba za ka iya shiga cikin cin zarafi da aka yi wa wani ba, ko kuma ka sa wasu mutane su yi hakan. Wannan ya haɗa da fata ko fatan cewa wani zai fuskanci rauni na jiki. Ƙara koyo.

Dokokin Twitter : Ba za ka iya shiga cikin cin zarafin wani ba, ko kuma ka sa wasu mutane su yi hakan. Muna ɗaukar cin zarafin a matsayin yunƙurin cin zarafi, tsoratarwa, ko kuma rufe muryar wani. …

Muna hana halayyar da ke tursasawa ko tsoratarwa, ko akasin haka da nufin kunyata ko ƙasƙantar da wasu.

Tunda sauya alkibla a yunqurin gujewa keta dokar kasuwanci, @BrainOnPorn tana zagi, cin mutunci, tozartawa da wulakanta ni, matata, ɗana, da mahaifiyar ɗana. Wadannan mutane biyun ba su taɓa yin sharhi game da wani abu da ya shafi batsa ko @BrainOnPorn ba. Isaya yana aiki a fagen fasaha. Ɗayan tana gudanar da kasuwancin da ta haɓaka bayan ita kuma muka rabu, wanda ba ni da sha'awa. Irin wannan tursasawar da aka yi niyya tana lalata dukkanin su biyun da ƙeta. Dukansu suna cikin fargaba don amincin su.

Don aiwatar da wannan mulkin ta'addanci, @BrainOnPorn yana sanya hotuna marasa izini, takardu, da sauran “shaidu” da aka ƙirƙira, sannan kuma ya zama mai nuna ɓarna ko ƙarya game da waɗannan abubuwan da mutanen da aka ambata. @BrainOnPorn kuma yana sanya wulakanci, zargin karya da nufin musgunawa da wulakanta shi. Na ba da rahoto da yawa na cin mutunci da m tweets, A ƙarshe. Twitter daga ƙarshe ya ba da amsa ta hanyar hana Anti-YBOP na kwana ɗaya da tabbatarwa ta hanyar sanarwa cewa Fuskanci ya keta dokokin twitter game da cin zarafi da hargitsi

Haramcin rana guda:

Twitter ta tabbatar da cewa Anti-YBOP ta keta dokokin twitter don cin zarafi da tursasawa:

Asusun mai amfani da sunan Prause ba komai bane face asusun sa ido.

updates:

Ana ci gaba: Yin amfani da amfani da @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don musgunawa da ɓata sunan Laila Mickelwait bayan ta fara Yakin TraffickingHub don ɗaukar Pornhub alhakin ɗaukar nauyin batsa na yara da bidiyo na mata safarar mata (sama da tweets 100). Yi amfani da ƙarya don zargin Laila na tallafawa ko aika barazanar mutuwa, da sauran ayyukan haram.

Laila Mickelwait ta kasance mai yawan kai hari ga Prause da sunanta na @BrainOnPorn. (Laila ta bayar da takardar shaida a cikin karar batanci da aka shigar a kan Prause.) A zahiri, RealYBOP Twitter (Prause) ta kai hari ga Laila Mickelwait wajen kare kanta daga batsa da rashin tantance shekaru na Pornhub.

Takardar neman Mickelwait ta sanya PornHub a matsayin wanda zai dauki alhakin abubuwan da ba su da tushe kuma ba bisa ka'ida ba da aka sanya a shafinta ta samu sa hannun sama da miliyan biyu, kuma daga karshe jaridar NY Times ta buga wani labarin bincike wanda ya tabbatar da ikirarin da TraffickingHub da Laila suka gabatar: The Children of Pornhub - Me yasa Kanada ta ba wa wannan kamfani damar cin gajiyar bidiyon cin zarafi da cin zarafi?

Yaƙin TraffickingHub ya sa @BrainOnPorn ya zama cikakke a kan ayyukan yanar gizo, ƙarairayi da ɓatanci - duk don tallafawa ajandar PornHub. Fewan misalai (na sama da tweets 100) suna ƙasa.

Laila ta rubuta wani rubutu da ke nuna alamun da aka tsara na kamfe ɗin ɓata mata suna da kuma Exodus Cry, da kuma cin zarafinta da kuma ɓata mata suna. Wasu kaɗan daga cikin labarinta:

Wannan kamfen din neman yardar da jama'a suka yi shi ne karshen dusar kankara. A shekarar da ta gabata, Mindgeek da masu maye gurbin sa a lokaci guda sun gudanar da mummunan duhu, kamfen na ɓoye don ɓata sunan, musgunawa, da tsoratar da waɗanda suka nemi bayyana gaskiyar…

A wannan lokacin, ni da iyalina ma an yi mana barazana, tursasawa, cin mutunci, da lalata mu ta hanyar ƙungiyar masu aiki, yawancinmu muna iya haɗa kai tsaye zuwa Mindgeek da masu ba da shawara. Kusan dangin dangi sunyi wa imel dinsu, asusun banki, da kuma ajiyar girgije. Anyi imel da hotunan dangi masu zaman kansu don nuna musu tsoro da tsoratar dasu da kuma kaina….

Ba mu san ko @BrainOnPorn ya yi magana da ma'aikatan Mindgeek ba, amma wannan mummunan asusun na Twitter ya zama daya daga cikin manyan cibiyoyin da ke muzgunawa da bata sunan Laila da Fitowar Kuka (kafin a dakatar da asusun a karshen Oktoba, 2020).

Anan, RealYBOP kai tsaye tana tallafawa Mindgeek, mai gidan yanar gizo ta PornHub ta hanyar niyya mai zuwa Taila ta Laila Mickelwait.

Anan RealYBOP ke kai hari ga Laila, yayin da yake kare Shugaba na Mindgeek. Lura: RealYBOP yayi karya yayin tabbatar da asusun ba na Shugaba na Mindgeek bane.

-------

RealYBOP ta kai hari kan TraffickingHub , wanda shine kamfen ɗin da ake yi na kama Pornhub da alhakin ɗaukar nauyin bidiyon batsa da cin zarafin yara (wanda Laila Mickelwait ta fara ).

-------

Anan RealYBOP ya tafi wacko don wulakanta Fitowa Kuka:

RealYBOP ta dunƙule magoya bayan Traffickinghub:

Supportarin tallafi na Pornhub (babu faɗi game da kuɗin da Mindgeek ke karɓa daga amfani da wasu):

Saukar da zaren magoya bayan Traffickinghub, sanya kudin EC, kamar dai kasafin kudin yana da alaqa da Pornhub.

RealYBOP ta wallafa a shafin ta na Twitter cewa Laila bata halarci USC ba. Merritt ta kira RealYBOP don karyar ta:

RealYBOP yana sanya bayanan kuɗi, ƙarya yana nuna wani abu mai inuwa yana faruwa. RealYBOP ta ce korafin 'yan safarar ba ya yin komai. Yaya ba daidai ba RealYBOP ta kasance: https://traffickinghub.com/

Merritt posts zanga-zangar adawa da Pornhub kuma RealYBOP ta kai harin:

RealYBOP tana yin batanci ga mutane , tana faɗin ƙarya cewa Laila tana roƙon maza su yi barazana da kuma bin mata. Hotunan allo guda huɗu ba su nuna komai game da wanda ake bin sa ba, balle ma Laila ta gaya mata hakan.

Arin ɓata suna, da'awar ƙarya Laila ta razana mata mata da yawa. Hotunan kariyar suna na bayanan yanar gizo da ba a san su ba. Babu abin da ya shafi Laila.

RealYBOP ta yi muni ƙwarai, tare da misalai da yawa na ɓata suna a kowane lokaci :

RealYBOP ta ce ƙarar ba za ta yi komai ba, duk da haka ta sa Pornhub ta goge fiye da rabin bidiyonta, ta sanya sabbin ƙa'idoji, kuma ta sa 'yan majalisa su fara ƙudirin doka da bincike . Me ya faru da RealYBOP? An cire gidan yanar gizon saboda keta alamar kasuwanci, yayin da aka dakatar da asusun Twitter da ke da alaƙa har abada saboda cin zarafi!

Erarin maganganun mahaukaci. Ba abin mamaki ba ne da jam'iyyun da yawa ke tuhumar Prause.

RealYBOP yana ci gaba da yin fa'idar Pornhub:

M cyberstalking ya ci gaba:

Bayan tweets 10 a ranar 30 ga Satumba Satumba akan Laila da yakinta Traffickinghub, RealYBOP ya sake farawa a ranar 1 ga Oktoba tare da ƙarin ƙaryar:

Ƙarin ɓata suna da shi :

Ƙarin ƙarya daga RealYBOP. A cikin tweet ɗin RealYBOP ya haɗa zuwa WIPO, wanda ya shafi keta haƙƙin alamar kasuwanci na YBOP. Labarai masu ban tsoro - WIPO ba shi da mahimmanci domin Wilson yanzu ya mallaki URL na RealYBOP: HANKALI: YBOP ta sami www.RealYourBrainOnPorn.com a cikin yarjejeniyar keta haƙƙin alamar kasuwanci.

Haukakar RealYBOP ta ci gaba:

Hakanan, ƙarin ƙaryar. Screenshots ba su da alaƙa da kowa, kawai maganganun intanet bazuwar.

Ba abin mamaki ba ne da ake gabatar da kara don ɓata suna:

Liesarin ƙaryar da yin amfani da yanar gizo: Laila ba ta tara kuɗi don sauran ƙungiyoyi ba. (An gabatar da kararraki don lalata NoFap.)

LOL – Yanzu RealYBOP tana faɗin ƙarya cewa Gary Wilson ya yi rantsuwar ƙarya. Abin dariya ne yadda hotunan kariyar kwamfuta nata ba su ƙunshi misalai ba, duk da haka wannan gidan yanar gizon yana ɗauke da misalai da yawa na rantsuwar ƙarya ta Prause: Nicole Prause & David Ley sun yi rantsuwar ƙarya a cikin ƙarar ɓata suna (Satumba, 2019) . Hmm…ta yaya RealYBOP ta sami hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na ƙorafe-ƙorafen FBI na Prause akan layi - wanda ba ya ba kowa suna, har da ni? Oh eh, RealYBOP ita ce Prause.

Shafin Twitter na YBOP yana musanta ƙaryar Prause: https://twitter.com/YourBrainOnPorn/status/1313947340554690562

Amsar tana samun nutsuwa:

An fallasa ƙarin rantsuwar ƙarya ta Prause a nasarar shari'a ta Wilson, inda kotuna suka yanke hukuncin cewa ba mai bin diddigi ba ne, kuma Prause shine mai laifin - ƙoƙarin Prause na yin shiru da Wilson ya gaza; an musanta umarnin hana ta a matsayin abin da ba shi da amfani kuma tana bin manyan kuɗaɗen lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP.

RealYBOP (an shiga cikin "Anti-YBOP," amma har yanzu @BrainOnPorn) yana tambayar wanda aka azabtar da Pornhub, Avri Sapir

Avri Sapir ya ba da amsa ga kyamar kyamar RealYBOP:

RealYBOP ta sake ƙoƙarin jawo hankalin mabiyanta su kai rahoton Exodus Cry ga jihar Missouri (kamar yadda Prause ta yi shekara guda da ta gabata - Fabrairu, 2019: Prause ta zargi Exodus Cry da zamba. Ta nemi mabiyan Twitter su kai rahoton ƙungiyar agaji ga babban lauyan Missouri (saboda dalilai na ƙarya), Da alama ta gyara shafin Wikipedia na Shugaba. ). Babu wanda ya san, ciki har da RealYBOP, wace keta dokar Exodus Cry da ake zargin ta yi.

Taimakon kai tsaye na PornHub:

A ƙarshe, Gwadawa ba ta ɓoye a bayan asusunta na asusunta ba:

Nan da nan ta koma ga sunan laƙabarta, tana nuna a bayyane: EC na son kawo ƙarshen fataucin mata.

Hitarin fashe-fage da aka ɗora da ƙarya:

Arin yin amfani da yanar gizo don tallafawa Pornhub:

Arin tattaunawar yanar gizo na masu goyon bayan Traffickinghub:

Shigar da zaren magoya bayan Traffickinghub, yana yada labaran karya:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Duk da haka, Prause yanzu tana amfani da asusunta na sirri don ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo da ɓata sunan Laila - da kuma goyon bayanta ga Pornhub. A cikin yawancin sakonnin RealYBOP da yanzu Prause, ta faɗi a fili ko ta ambaci ni ina sanya adireshinta a kan YBOP ko twitter. Tana ƙarya kuma ba ta taɓa bayar da wata shaida cewa hakan ya faru ba. Kuma Prause bai bayar da wata shaida a cikin ƙararraki 2 da na ci ba wanda ya tabbatar da cewa Prause tana ƙarya adireshinta yana kan YBOP ko a ko'ina (zaren Twitter yana fallasa Prause a matsayin ƙarya ):

Lokacin da mutane ke bin Pornhub, Fushin shiga cikin zarensu, yana sanya suna.

------

Tana bata sunan Laila lokacin da Laila take bin Pornhub. Laila ba ta rubuta wasiƙa don tallafawa watsa adireshin Prause ba. Babu wanda yayi. Duk BS.

(shafin Twitter da ke fallasa Prause a matsayin ƙarya game da adireshinta da kowa ya buga):

----------

Lalata Laila & tallafawa Pornhub. Ta gabatar da karya a karkashin tweetff ta Kristoff ta danganta ga labarin Laila wanda ke bayanin lalata da abokan kawancen batsah, kamar Prause:

----------

Karyace cewa Laila tana tallafawa tashin hankali (Abin wasa ne - kamar yadda Prause ke tallafawa PornHub!).

--------

A nan, Prause ta yi ƙarya cewa Laila tana da hannu a cikin barazanar kisa da aka yi iƙirarin yi. Har ila yau, Prause ta yi ƙarya cewa na sanya adireshinta a kan YBOP (shafin Twitter yana fallasa Prause a matsayin ƙarya ):

-------

Ƙarin ƙarya iri ɗaya (shafin Twitter da ke fallasa Prause a matsayin ƙarya ):

---------

Karya cewa Laila na da hannu a barazanar barazanar kisa. Me yasa Prause ke damun Kristof, wanda ya fallasa ayyukan batsa da lalata na Pornhub?

Ta yaya abin ƙyama yake cewa Tweets tweets suna kwance ƙarƙashin bidiyo ta wanda aka azabtar da Pornhub?

----------

Cigaba da yin magana ta hanyar yanar gizo da karya. Laila ba ta taɓa cewa an biya Prause ta batsa ba.

Lura da yadda Furuci ke ɓata sunan Laila a cikin zaren inda ake caccakar Pornhub. Shin wannan hanyarta ce ta tallafawa Pornhub?

---------

Arin wauta a cikin wani zaren inda ake sukar Pornhub.

------

Tare da ita @BrainOnPorn asusun da aka dakatar don musgunawa, Dole ne a yi amfani da asusun nasa don ɓata waɗanda ke sukar batsahub:

--------

Defarin ɓata suna.

------

Yi amfani da sakonnin nata na kansa, ba daidai ba game da ƙauyuka:

Wani:

GASKIYA:

Tabbatarwar tana ƙarƙashin yarjejeniyar bayyanawa, wanda Prause ya bayyana yana keta.
Ba wanda ya ce “manyan kudade, ”Amma kamfanin inshora na Prause a fili ya biya biyan kuɗi zuwa Rhodes da Hilton.
"Janye da son zuciya”Yin sulhu yana nufin mai gabatar da kara (Rhodes, Hilton) ya amince da“ yarjejeniyar ”wanda ake kara, don haka a shirye yake ya yi watsi da karar ta farko. “Tare da nuna wariya” kawai yana nufin cewa mai shigar da kara ba zai sake tuhumar wanda ake kara ba saboda asali da'awar. Mai gabatar da kara yana da 'yanci sake yin kara game da sabbin da'awa, kamar saba ka'idojin yarjejeniyar sulhu.
"Ban biya komai ba.”Wataƙila, amma kamfani inshora na fili ya yi!
"Babu wani binciken cin mutunci da aka taba yi.”Yi amfani da sasantawa kowane karar don kauce wa bin ka'idodi da gwajin juri. Ba a yanke hukunci ba. Haka kuma babu wani "binciken."
A karar cin mutunci ta uku ta ci gaba, kuma na yi nasara a kararraki 2 da aka yi wa Prause, na fallasa ta a matsayin mai aikatawa, ba wanda aka azabtar ba (kwat da wando # 1, kwat da wando # 2).

---------

Bugu da ƙari, tweeting a ƙarƙashin zargi na Pornhub, tare da # damuwa:

-------

Arin ɓata suna, yayin tallafawa kamfen ɗin Pornhub akan Laila.

Babu kungiyoyin Laila Haddad masu yakar batsa.

-------

Abin ƙyama. Gunawa ya ce NCOSE & Laila sun tunzura kashe-kashe a ɗakin taro na Atlanta. Wani bugun EJ Dickson, wanda ke dauke da “gwani ': David Ley

Arin kallon yanar gizo mai cike da damuwa, sanya rubutun Rolling Stone (lura da yadda ake gabatar da sakonni a ƙarƙashin tweets suna lalata Pornhub)

Ofari iri ɗaya, a rana ɗaya:

Kuma ƙari a rana ɗaya. Abin dariya: Laila tana "tsokano tashin hankali ga mata", amma Pornhub yana da kyau (Karanta koyaushe yana da alama shigar da zaren inda ake lalata ko kuma fallasa Pornhub)

----------

Kwana daya. Kai. Shiga XBIZ don shafawa Laila. Masana’antar batsa suna tsoro.

Rana daya, karya daya ce.

Na 9th tweet daga Maris 25th.

A'a, ba a yi mata hari a wajen "ofishin da ƙungiyarta ta sanya ba". Kamar yadda aka bayyana, Prause ta kira duk wanda ba ta son "ƙungiya". Ni ba na cikin kowace "ƙungiya", amma Nikky tana magana a kaina, kuma tana ƙaryar cewa na sanya adireshinta a YBOP: Fabrairu, 2021: Prause ta buga tweets 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 da ƙarya tana cewa na sanya adireshinta a YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a cikin 2020 Prause ta yi tweet cewa babu wanda, ciki har da ni, ke da ainihin adireshinta. Karyace-karyacenta ba su dace ba (takardun tweets bayan kwanaki 5).

-------

Tana kwance kamar yadda twitter bata bayyana wanda ya bada rahoto ba.

Karya ɗaya ce. Ba ta san wanda ya ba da rahoton labarinta ba. Amma ya kamata a bayar da rahoton, domin yana da hannu a cin zarafi, ɓata suna da kuma satar bayanai ta intanet. Dangane da kalaman Laila game da mijinta, tana da barazanar kisa a koyaushe bayan ta ɗauki nauyin kasuwanci na dala biliyan ɗaya. Duba - Ƙarshen kamfen ɗin tsoratarwa na Pornhub.

-------

M cyberstalker:

Kwana daya. Yi amfani da yanar gizo ta hanyar magana da wani wanda aka azabtar da Pornhub

Kwana daya. A karkashin rubutun da ke zuwa bayan Pornhub.

Wani kuma a rana guda, tweeting duk inda ake lalata batsah

Bugu da ƙari, duk inda Pornhub ke cikin matsala, tana cikin ceto.

----------

Cyberstalking a tweet disparaging Pornhub. Mamaki.

RE: Bayan tweets - Ban taɓa cewa Prause tana ƙarya game da cin zarafinta ba (duk da cewa ita maƙaryaciya ce mai cutarwa, mai ɓata suna, kuma mai amfani da yanar gizo). Na ce tana ƙarya game da cin zarafin da aka yi a wani adireshin da aka sanya a YBOP: Fabrairu, 2021: Prause ta wallafa tweets 70 cikin kwanaki 5 da ƙarya tana cewa na sanya adireshinta a YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a 2020 Prause ta wallafa tweet cewa babu wanda, ciki har da ni, ke da ainihin adireshinta. Karyace-karyacenta ba su dace ba (takardun tweets bayan kwanaki 5).

Cyberstalking don Pornhub, kuma. Wannan lokacin haɗin gwiwa tare da Daraktan Sadarwa na FSC (@Bbchausa), Mike Stabile.

Ba karo na 1 da tayi aiki tare da FSC ba:

Cyberstalking a tweet disparaging Pornhub. Karyata zargin Laila da yin "korafin barazanar masu laifi"

Da alama Prause tana magana ne game da haramcin da ta yi a twitter, inda wani ya ba da rahotonta game da yin barazanar tashin hankali - Maris, 2021: An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na ɗan lokaci saboda "rubutu kan barazanar tashin hankali" . Tana ƙarya, saboda twitter ba ta taɓa bayyana wanda ya yi rahoton ba. Ba za ta iya daina yin ƙarya ba, ko da kuwa duk twitter sun sani.

--------

Tallafawa batsahub ta hanyar yanar gizo.

Na ce - Fabrairu, 2021: An yi wa Prause rubutu sau 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 da karya suna cewa na sanya adireshinta a YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a 2020 Prause ta yi wa Twitter cewa babu wanda, ciki har da ni, ke da ainihin adireshinta. Karyata ba ta dace ba (takardun tweets sun wuce kwanaki 5).

Kwana daya. Haka karya.

Ya haifar da yin amfani da yanar gizo.

Yi amfani da retweets wani cin mutuncin shills.

Na biyu sake aikowa.

--------

Supportarin tallafi ga Mindgeek ta hanyar lalata Laila da Staci Sprout.

Rana guda “tsokano tashin hankali” ta hanyar ƙalubalantar Pornhub. Huh?

-----

Rana mai zuwa (14 ga Afrilu, 2021). Sakonni uku masu ɓatanci a jere:

Rana guda - 3 a jere suna lalata Staci Sprout da Laila. Same gaji karya.

Kwana daya. Daga kare Pornhub.

Kwana guda, ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo.

A rana guda, sanya posting VICE a yanki, a sake, duk inda aka ambaci Pornhub.

An yi mata tambayoyi game da yadda take bin diddigin yanar gizo. Ta amsa da hoton wani rahoto na 'yan sanda na watan Afrilu, 2019 game da wani sharhi da ba ta so ba.

Rahoton:

Zan kasance a ofishin 'yan sanda idan na gabatar da rahoto game da kowane maganganu ko tsoratar da magana game da ni (da yawa ta yin amfani da kanta).

Tana da dogon tarihi na gabatar da rahotannin 'yan sanda na karya:

Tana da tarihin shigar da rahotannin ƙarya da na mugunta – Mutane da yawa da suka fuskanci Rahoton Mugunta da Amfani da Tsarin Mugunta na Nicole Prause.

Kwana daya. Kamar samun nutter.

A rana guda, wani goro mai cike da tweet. Sikanin allo ba shi da komai tare da abin da ake da'awar da'awar. Bugu da ƙari, don tallafawa batsahub:

Kwana daya. Nawa ne wancan?

Kwana daya.

15 ko haka tweets na batanci a cikin kwana guda da nufin Laila - duk don tallafawa ajandar masana'antar batsa.

---------

Washegari (15 ga Afrilu, 2021), aika rubuce rubuce a ƙarƙashin Gabe, wanda ya toshe ta. Yi baƙin ciki cewa Pornhub yana gab da rasa tsabar kuɗi:

Kwana daya. In ji laila tana kokarin kashe pepole. Abin da goro.

Kwana daya. Ba damuwa cewa Pornhub yana gab da rasa tsabar kuɗi

A wannan rana, ina goyon bayan Mindgeek. Lura - Prause tana ƙarya game da tweet ɗin da ke magana game da Pornhub, ba ita ba, lokacin da aka ce "Akwai wuri na musamman a jahannama ga irin waɗannan mutanen da ke cin zalin marasa ƙarfi da talakawa"

Hoton da aka yi wa Prause, wanda aka cire babban tweet ɗin, kuma an sanya tweet ɗina a ƙasan " wuri na musamman a jahannama " ba daidai ba.

Ga ainihin tsarin sakonnin da aka yi. An wallafa a ƙarƙashin sakon Twitter na Aamir mai watanni 9, kuma na amsa da cewa tana fallasa ta a matsayin ƙarya da kuma yin leƙen asiri ta yanar gizo :

Wannan shine abin da take yi… koyaushe.

Wannan karon a karkashin Laila, suna neman a binciki Laila.

Dole ne Pornhub ya ƙaunace ta.

---------

Washegari (Afrilu 16, 2021) - Yin aiki tare da XBIZ (Gustavo Turner) don kai hari ga Laila Mickelwait:

-------

Podcast Podcast tare da VICE's Samantha Cole, marubucin bugun. An fallasa Pornhub saboda wahalarwa a cikin lalata yara da fataucin yara. Visa, Mastercard & Discover yanke sarrafa katin. Grant Thornton, Heinz / Unilever & PayPal sun yanke alaƙa. Pornhub ya share 80% na rukunin yanar gizonsa (bidiyo miliyan 10) an shigar da kara 5. An gabatar da shi a gaban majalisar Kanada - kuma duk da haka muna da Nuna tweeting don tallafawa masu zartarwar PornHub!

-------

Cyberstalking Fitowa Kuka a daren Juma'a.

------

Kai. Yana zargin wanzuwar gobara:

---------------------------

A ƙarshe, wani shiri na 2021 a cikin Jaridar Washington Times ta Laila Mickelwait wanda ke bayyana ayyukan banza na Pornhub da masu gudanar da ita (kamar RealYBOP) - Ƙarshen kamfen na tsoratarwa na Pornhub.

updates:

Gudana: Yin amfani da amfani BrainOnPorn da kuma @NicoleRPrause don zargin Matt Fradd da yaudara, barazanar tashin hankali na jiki, da tallafawa "barazanar mutuwa" da "bin mata".

Wannan yana ɗaya daga cikin sassa da yawa da ke nuna yadda Prause ke ci gaba da yaƙin neman zaɓe inda ta zargi waɗanda ta zaɓa da aika barazanar kisa, ko tallafawa barazanar kisa, ko kuma sa wasu su aika barazanar kisa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba. Ga wasu bayanai:

YBOP yayi tir da barazanar, munanan kalamai a shafukan sada zumunta, haka ma duk wanda muka sani. Wannan ya ce, intanet ita ce Wild West. Yawancin mutanen da ke cikin jama'a - na kowane jinsi da jinsi - sun gaya mana cewa a kai a kai suna samun tsoffin maganganu daga masu lalata yanar gizo. Handfulananan maganganun da ba a san su ba Yi amfani da da'awar sun ƙaddamar da kodadde a kwatanta.

Da alama tana bincika intanet don neman shaidar cewa ana cin zarafinta, har ma tana amfani da wata manhajar Reddit ta musamman don tattara maganganun da ba a san ko su waye ba, waɗanda masu kula da dandalin tattaunawa suka riga suka goge su cikin sauri da kuma akai-akai. Sannan ta zargi mutanen da take son ɓata suna da rubutawa ko ƙarfafa maganganun - ba tare da wata ƴar shaida ba.

Yana faɗar cewa ta ɓoye wasu ƙananan misalai na abin da ake zargi da ita. Da alama mutane ba su da isasshen kulawa game da ayyukan Prause don su wahalar da ita.

Yin watsi da alherinta saboda ba safai ake niyya da ita ba, tana yawan yin kara game da abin da take fama da shi ta hanyar amfani da karamin tarinta. Abin damuwa, a cikin watanni biyu da suka gabata ta ɗauka don inganta wannan kamfen. Ta kara da cewa maganganun da ke ban mamaki cewa abubuwan da ke faruwa a kan layi suna da alhakin misalin tabawa maras so (wanda ta bayyana a matsayin "cin zarafin jima'i"). Ta yi zargin cewa mummunan lamarin ya faru a titunan Santa Monica a watan Oktoba na 2019.

Ina shaidar da ke nuna cewa wannan lamari yana da alaƙa ta kowace hanya da abubuwan da suka faru a yanar gizo? Daga cikin sharhin da ta yi a yanar gizo, kaɗan ne kawai za a iya ɗaukarsu a matsayin barazana. Babu wata shaida da ke haɗa tarin "barazanar" da take da shi ga mutanen da har ma suna da alaƙa da mutane da yawa da take zargi a shafin Twitter da haifarwa, tallafawa, ko haɓaka barazanar kisa. Haka kuma babu wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan ikirarinta cewa maganganun da ta nuna suna da alaƙa da ƙoƙarin danne mata masana kimiyya. Kuma babu wata shaida da ke nuna cewa maganganun da ake yi wa trolls suna kan hanyarta (barazanar da ke tafe).

Yi amfani da tweets na yau da kullun cewa ya gabatar da rahoton 'yan sanda ko FBI game da waɗanda aka ambata a cikin ɓatancin a cikin tweets. Abin dariya, yadda tilasta bin doka ba zai taɓa tuntuɓar ɗayanmu ba.

YBOP ba ya yarda da mugayen labarai, masu barazanar… da kowa. Abin mamaki ne cewa Yin wasa yana samun waɗannan postsan sandunan masu matukar damuwa lokacin da ta sanya da yawa na mugunta, ɓatanci, barazanar barazanar nata.

Yanzu ga yakinta na adawa da Fradd. Wannan abin ƙyama ne mai ban mamaki. RealYBOP tweeting cin mutunci a karkashin matar Matt Fradd na bikin ranar bikin aurensu:

Sau da yawa @BrainOnPorn & @NicoleRPrause sun rubuta wasiƙun karya da abokanta na kud da kud suka rubuta (yawanci sauran membobin RealYBOP) bisa ga umarnin Prause. Ta yi ƙoƙarin shigar da wasiƙun guda 4 a cikin shari'arta ta hana ta zamba , amma alkali ya ga a cikinsu babu komai (marubutan wasiƙun sun sake maimaita abin da Prause ya gaya musu kawai - waɗanda ƙarya ne, ba tare da wata shaidar tallafi ba).

Duk da haka, waɗannan haruffan 4, waɗanda ta yi tweeting sau da yawa, ba su faɗi abin da da'awar da'awar suka faɗa ba. Babu ɗaya daga cikin marubutan wasiƙar da ya ce na bi su. Haruffa da ba a san su ba suna ƙunshe da ainihin hujja don tallafawa da'awar da ake yi wa Prause. Takaitaccen bayyani game da haruffa 4 An gabatar da shi kuma an gabatar dashi a cikin tweets dayawa:

Daga Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da ya faɗi game da ni ko Yin wasa.
Daga Rebecca Sullivan ta Kanada. Wasikar mai shafi 2 tana da layin amai guda daya game da ni, tana cewa na kawo takaitaccen bayani kan Motion na Kanada 47. Babu wani abu kuma.
Daga Madita Oeming ta Jamus. Ba ta taɓa da'awar cewa na sa mata ido ko yi mata barazana ta kowace hanya ba. Madadin haka, Oeming mai sihiri-fata ya yi fari saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da maganganun da ba ta tallafi ba, kuma ya sake wallafawa Gabe Deem ya rushe labarinta na Fabrairu, 2020. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita rashin gaskiyar Prause amma ba tare da wata shaidar goyan baya ba.
Wasikar karshe itace tatsuniya mai cike da karya ta Daniel Burgess, wanda ya mallaki RealYBOP, ya yi amfani da laƙabi don yin magana da ni ta yanar gizo, kuma yana da kansa a lokuta da yawa na ɓata suna. Gaskiya game da Burgess da ma'amalar mu sosai rubuce a wannan shafin. Ayyukan shari'a sun ci gaba tare da Mista Burgess, gami da magance sabbin sakonni na tweets (duba ƙasa) waɗanda suka zarge ni da laifin aika barazanar mutuwa da bin mata 5. (Sabuntawa, Janairu, 2021: Gary Wilson yanzu yana da URL na RealYBOP).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Babu wani wuri da za a yi amfani da sakonnin tweets na ɓatanci a cikin zaren da aka ambata Fradd. Duk da cewa Gabe Deem ta toshe ta amma ta shiga zaren sa tare da yawan bata sunan ta na “barazanar mutuwa” zargin.

Abubuwan da aka yi amfani da su sun shafi magana na minti 6 da ke neman wasu su goyi bayan karar da Alex Rhodes ya yi game da Prause. Ga abin da ta bata suna:

Matt a zahiri bai taɓa ambata ta da suna ba.
Matt ya ambaci wani “m mutum” (ba “m mace").
Matt bai taba cewa "An yi amfani da Prause a cikin masana'antar batsa ba."
Matt bai ce “fitar da ita” ba. Maimakon haka, ya ce, “Ba zan yi mamaki ba idan muka ga masana'antar batsa sun fara lalacewa ta wata hanya mai mahimmanci, saboda wanene wannan mutumin,”Wanda har yanzu bai fita daga mahallin ba.
Babu wata shaidar shaidar sifiri da ke haɗa roƙon Fradd don tallafawa Rhodes tare da kowane daga cikin maganganun Prause / RealYBOP a kai a kai a matsayin tweet kamar “barazanar mutuwa.”

---------

Trolling wani zaren, sai ta zargi Fradd da barazanar barazanar. Babu hujja, kawai hoto ne na maganganun da ba a sani ba waɗanda aka tattara tsawon shekaru.

--------

Ƙari ɗaya. Babu wani abu da ya shafi masana'antar batsa? Bayyana shaidar da ke wannan shafin: Shin Masana'antar Batsa Ta Shafi Nicole Prause?

--------

Troll wani zaren (ana kiranta abu mai ban mamaki):

Matt bai taba cewa komai game da “rufe mata baki ba.”

--------

An fara fara washegari da ƙarin ƙarya. An yi ƙarya cewa Fradd ya gaya musu "su yi mini duka."

A zahiri, Matt ya gaya wa Alex ya “Shura jaki.” Hankula Hankula masu motsa jiki. Yi ƙarya game da abin da wani ya faɗa, da fatan masu ba da labarinku sun kasa kallon hotunan kariyar kwamfuta. Ga hotunan hoto:

Tana iya shafawa Fradd rai saboda ya ba da $ 1,000 kuma ya nemi mabiyansa su ba da abin da za su iya.

-------

Kai, ta tursasa sakon Fradd game da ƙaramin ɗansa!

Ana bin diddigi? Na san ta yi ƙarya tsawon shekaru game da ni ina bin diddiginta ( kuma kotu ta amince ). Ta kuma yi ƙarya game da dole ne ta ƙaura akai-akai saboda bin diddigin. Ta kuma yi wa mutane da yawa da na sani zargin karya da ke bin diddiginta da/ko masana kimiyya mata.

Ya kamata a lura cewa 'yar jaridar bincike ta Kanada Diana Davison wacce ta rubuta littafin The Post Millennial ta fallasa a kan Dr. Prause , ta yi magana da ita a kan rikodin na tsawon kusan mako guda. A cikin sharhin jama'a a ƙarƙashin wani bidiyo mai alaƙa Davison ta yi sharhi , " Pruse ta faɗi abubuwa da yawa a gare ni amma babu ɗaya daga cikin "shaidar" da ta goyi bayan ikirarinta. A kowane hali, shaidar ta juya wa wanda ya yi mata zagi. Tana zargin wasu da ainihin abubuwan da ita da kanta ta yi. Na yi mata imel, a kan rikodin, na kusan mako guda ." A cikin sharhi na biyu Davison ya ce , " Lokacin da na ce na yi makonni biyu ina bincike wannan yana nufin ina karanta kowace takarda a kotu da kowace takarda mai alaƙa kuma na yi mako guda ina aika imel tare da Prause da kanta wacce ta katse ni bayan na fara neman ainihin shaidar cin zarafi. "

Kwana biyu daga baya tallan tallan Fradd ya ci gaba. A wannan karon suna zargin Fradd da barazanar barazanar tashin hankali kai tsaye.

------

Arin yin amfani da yanar gizo da yaudara.

Kudaden ba su “tashi ba”. Kowace dala da aka tara ta je biyan kuɗin shari'a a ƙarar Alex Rhodes game da ɓata suna . Babu abin da ya shafi masana'antar batsa? Bayyana shaidar da ke wannan shafin: Shin Masana'antar Batsa Ta Shafi Nicole Prause?

Ta ci gaba:

-------

Zargin Fradd na aikata zamba.

Prause tana ƙarya cewa "babu abin da ya taɓa faruwa". Ta shigar da ƙarar fatarar kuɗi don guje wa ɗaukar alhakin ƙarar ɓata suna guda 3 da ba a yi musu shari'a ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc) kuma ta guji biyan ni bashin kuɗin lauya da ta ci (a nasarar da na samu a Anti-SLAPP). Ku sani, Prause ba ta da wata matsala ta kuɗi. Kawai ta tattara mafi yawan kadarorinta zuwa asusun ritayarta (fiye da kwata na dala miliyan), kuma ta lissafa ƙaramin bashin mabukaci (ƙasa da $3,000). Iƙirarin rashin biyan kuɗi ya dogara ne kawai akan yuwuwar bashi daga ƙarar ɓata suna da ke sama (wanda ƙila ba a taɓa yi masa shari'a ba), tare da wasu dala $40 da za ta ci ni da zarar alkali ya albarkaci kuɗin. Sai alkaliyar fatara ta ba da umarnin duk ƙarar ɓata suna guda 3 don gwada sulhu. Prause & kamfanin inshorarta sun cimma matsaya da Don Hilton da Alex Rhodes. Ba a bayyana sharuɗɗan ba, amma kamfanin inshora ya ba da manyan kuɗaɗe don sasantawa kafin sulhun. Ina zargin cewa dole ne Prause ta sanya hannu kan wata yarjejeniya ta rashin nuna rashin girmamawa, wadda ba ta lura da ita ba.

-------

Ta fara a washegari. Yanzu tana ikirarin cewa Matt ya iza rikici. Amma duk da haka ba ta taɓa bayar da wata hujja game da tashin hankali ba, amma ita kaɗai Matt.

Faɗin "kuɗin sun tafi" daidai ne - duk kuɗin da aka bayar sun shiga cikin ƙarar. Gudummawar sun kasa ɗaukar nauyin duk abin da Alex ya kashe na shari'a.

------

Ƙari na wannan.

"Ta tafi"? Gudummawar sun kasa ɗaukar nauyin duk abin da Alex ya kashe na shari'a.

--------

Arin ɓata suna, zargin ƙarya Fradd da tunzura rikici.

-----

Karya yake cewa Fradd ya iza rikici.

Kudin sun biya kuɗin doka. Kamfanin inshora na Prause ya biya kuɗin shari'arta da kuma biyan kuɗin ga Alex.

----

5 tweets a wannan rana suna ɓata sunan Matt, kuma suna ƙarya game da kararraki.

Tweet #2

Sanya # 3. Matt yanzu yana zuga kisan kai!

Tweet # 4: Shin tana zargin Matt game da harbi a ɗakin tausa na Atlanta? Abin da goro.

Tweet #5: Ana ɗaukar alhakin laifi? An yi wa Prause alhakin a wurare da dama na shari'a da kuma ƙarar ɓata suna: Nasarorin shari'a akan mai cin zarafi/ɓar suna Nicole Prause: Ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka zalunta ba!

------

Screenshot na gudummawar guda. Ya bata sunan Fradd ta hanyar zarginsa da yiwa mata barazana.

-------

Ofarin maganganun ƙarya ɗaya. Abin da mai amfani da yanar gizo.

---------

5 ga Mayu, 20201 - ci gaba da magana da yanar gizo. A bayyane yake Josh Duggar yayi amfani da software na Idanun Alkawari kuma Fradd yana ɗaya daga cikin masu magana da Yarjejeniyar ido. Yana ba ta uzuri don ɓata sunan Fradd.

Wani.

Wani kuma. Da yake ƙarya cewa Fradd ya ɗaga $ 197K don karar Alex Rhodes.

Wani, tabbas.

Bayan kwana biyu. Fradd bai taba matsawa mabiyansa su kai farmaki Yin amfani da shi ba.

---------

A ranar 26 ga Maris, 2020, an dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na ɗan lokaci saboda cin zarafi da kuma "rubutu kan barazanar tashin hankali"

Sauran - Aiki: BrainOnPorn (Yi aiki) ya zargi Gail Dines da "kasancewa a cikin rukuni" wanda ke aika barazanar mutuwa, ya sa mata masana kimiyya, kuma ya kalli mata a matsayin waɗanda ake kashewa & suka cancanci tashin hankali.

Wannan dole ne ya zama ɗaya daga cikin ƙarairayin da Prause ta taɓa yi. Ta amfani da asusunta na @BrainOnPorn , Prause ta ƙara kai hare-harenta kan masu adawa da batsa Gail Dines PhD. (Don misalan da suka gabata na ɓata mata suna da ɓata mata suna a kan Dines duba wannan sashe - Afrilu, 2017: Prause ta zagi Farfesa Gail Dines, PhD, wataƙila saboda shiga cikin "Op-ed: Wanene ainihin ke ɓatar da kimiyya a kan batsa?" ).

Kafin mu kai ga bata sunan, duba wannan tweet mai ban mamaki inda @BrainOnPorn ke kai hari ga Dines saboda sukar "batsa na ruwa." Tweet ɗin RealYBOP ba shi da alaƙa da sharhin Dine, amma RealYBOP duk game da tallafawa masana'antar batsa ne.

Kawai ɗaya daga cikin ɗaruruwan tweets na @BrainOnPorn don tallafawa ajandar masana'antar batsa.

--------

@BrainOnPorn wuraren shakatawa na gaba don ɓata suna, suna faɗar ƙarya cewa "ƙungiyar" Dines tana aika barazanar barazanar da zawarcin mata masana kimiyya waɗanda ke nazarin batsa

Shaidar BrainOnPorn? Screenshots na biyu daga haruffa huɗu Yi amfani da ba daidai ba a cikin tweets da yawa:

Na farko da Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da aka faɗi game da fatattakar '' rukunin '' Gail Dines ko Dines.
Na biyu kuma Madita Oeming ta Jamus. Babu abin da aka faɗi game da fatattakar '' rukunin '' Gail Dines ko Dines. Madadin haka, Oeming mai sihiri-fatar jiki ya yi kuka game da ni saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da maganganun da ba ta tallafi ba, kuma ya sake wallafawa Gabe Deem ya rushe labarinta na Fabrairu, 2020. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita abubuwan da ba gaskiya ba na Prause… amma ba tare da wata shaidar goyan baya ba (babu wani).

---------

Bayan 'yan kwanaki @BrainOnPorn ta ci gaba da bata mata suna, tana fadin karyar cewa Dines, kuma mai matukar son mata, suna tallafawa barazanar kashe mata masana kimiyya (!). @BrainOnPorn bai bayar da wata hujja ba don tallafawa da'awar ta wauta. Madadin haka @BrainOnPorn ya sanya jerin sunayen mutanen da aka ambata sau da yawa a cikin labaran kwanan nan game da batsa. Marubucin wannan jerin baya nufin waɗanda aka lissafa a matsayin masanan ilimin karya, ko wani abu.

-------

Ci gaba da bata suna, yana mai bayyana cewa Gail Dines na da hannu a cikin "kokarin da ke barazanar kashe mata masana kimiyya." Hakanan hotunan kariyar kwamfuta marasa mahimmanci.

----------

Hakanan hotunan kariyar hoto guda biyu basu da mahimmanci, tare da maganganun rainin hankali 2 daga intanet. Me yasa Dines, ko wani, zai buƙaci la'antar maganganun bazuwar ta hanyar yanar gizo?

Abin ƙyama.

------

Karya zargin Fradd da yiwa mata barazana.

updates:

Sauran - Aiki: @BrainOnPorn (Prause) ya zargi Liz Walker da ƙarfafan barazanar mutuwa akan mata, tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, kasancewa mai ƙiyayya da LGBTQ, da maƙarƙashiya.

Liz Walker ɗan Australiya ne mai gwagwarmayar yaƙi da batsa kuma mace mai kirkirar shirye-shiryen ilimi ga matasa kuma yayi aiki tare da Gail Dines. @BrainOnPorn (Fada) sau da yawa ana bata sunan Liz da wulakanta shi saboda tana goyon bayan yakin TraffickingHub kuma bata da ra'ayin batsa.

Ta fara da @BrainOnPorn tana cewa Liz Walker, Gabe Deem, Lalia Mickelwait da ni duk masu tashin hankali ne. Ba da hujja, ba shakka.

-------

Ga wani tweet mai cike da ƙarya. Liz ko Don Hilton ba sa adawa da LGBT (Hilton yana ƙarar Prause saboda ɓata suna ). "Shaidar" ta @BrainOnPorn hoton Liz ne da ke tweeting wannan bita na ilimi na adabi: Jima'i Addiction as a Disease: Shaida don Kimantawa, Ganowa, da Amsawa ga Masu Suka ( Phillips et al. , 2015).

Sauran hotunan kariyar allo na maganganun da ba a san su ba ta hanyar intanet, ba Liz Walker ba. Hakanan maganganun ƙarya ɗaya Yi amfani da tweets koyaushe.

-------

Liesarya da yawa a cikin tweet guda: WHO [Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya] ba ta taɓa tambayar Liz Walker ko wani ya yi wani abu ba; Liz ba ta ƙarfafa barazanar mutuwa; kuma ba a dauki hayar tsaro don kare kowa daga Hilton, Walker ko wani wanda wanda ake zargi Prause da ƙarya ba.

Kamar yadda aka saba, hotunan hotunan suna cikin haruffa 2 cikin 4 masu cike da ƙarya da Prause ta tattara don ƙarar da ta rasa a gare ni . Haruffa 4:

Ta memba na RealYBOP Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da ya ce game da ni.
Daga Rebecca Sullivan ta Kanada. Wasikar mai shafi 2 tana da layin amai guda daya game da ni, tana cewa na kawo takaitaccen bayani kan Motion na Kanada 47. Babu wani abu kuma.
Ta memba na RealYBOP Madita Oeming. Ba ta taɓa da'awar cewa na sa mata ido ko yi mata barazana ta kowace hanya ba. Madadin haka, Oeming yayi kuka saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da tallafi da'awarta. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita karairayin Prause… amma ba tare da wata shaida ba.
Wasikar karshe itace tatsuniya mai cike da karya ta Daniel Burgess, wanda ya mallaki URL na RealYBOP, yayi amfani da laƙabi don yin magana da ni, kuma yana da kansa tsunduma cikin yanayi da yawa na maganganun batanci. Gaskiya game da Burgess da ma'amalar mu shine sosai rubuce a wannan shafin.

--------

Ofarin maƙaryata ɗaya ta hanyar cyberstalker. Kira Liz Walker da 'hatemonger'.

--------

Liesarya suna ci gaba:

-------

Sanya irin maganganun da ba a sani ba, sannan a yiwa yawancinmu alama, suna cewa dole ne mu la'anci maganganun da bamu taɓa gani ba. (Ta yaya za mu iya? @BrainOnPorn ya katange mu duka don haka za ta iya yin amfani da zaren mu na Twitter ba tare da sanin mu ba.) Yin amfani da ladabi ya kasa ambaci duk barazanar da maganganun ƙiyayya / ƙarya da muke karɓa a kowace rana - wanda @BrainOnPorn da Prause suna da tukuna la'ana. Me yasa baku yi haka ba Dr.

A cikin wani labari na kashin kai, @BrainOnPorn ya wallafa tsokaci 3 a ƙarƙashin labarin SCRAM News mai ɓata suna inda Prause ya yi ƙarya. Waɗannan ƙaryar sun haifar da ƙarar SCRAM, an ja labarin, kuma SCRAM ta fita daga kasuwanci! Kamfanin watsa labarai na ScramNews ya tilasta wa ScramNews neman afuwa da biyan diyya mai yawa saboda buga ƙaryar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes & NoFap.

------

Kuma, @BrainOnPorn ta wallafa labarin SCRAM News mai bata suna, inda karyarta ta kai ga mutuwar SCRAM da kuma neman afuwa ga Alex Rhodes . Liz Walker ba ta taɓa yin magana da ScramNews ba kuma ba a ambace ta a cikin labarin ba.

Liz Walker ta ƙirƙiri wani ɗan gajeren rubutu game da cin zarafin @BrainOnPorn da ɓata suna: Gaskiyar zargin ƙarya na kwakwalwarka akan batsa . Ka yi tunanin Prause ba za ta iya jure wa gaskiyar da ta ɓata ba.

updates:

Sauran - Gudana: Gudanar da amfani @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya mai ilimin kwantar da hankali DJ Burr na "kasancewa cikin rukuni" wanda ke aika barazanar mutuwa, yana haifar da tashin hankali, yana hana mata samun kariya, da sauransu.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce na yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba. Yi amfani da tweets na yau da kullun cewa ya gabatar da rahoton 'yan sanda ko FBI game da waɗanda aka ambata a cikin ɓatancin a cikin tweets. Abin dariya, yadda tilasta bin doka ba zai taɓa tuntuɓar ɗayanmu ba.

Prause tana da dogon tarihi na ɓata suna, cin zarafi da kuma yin amfani da sakonnin Twitter don ɓata suna. Misali, a cikin 2019: Prause ta yi wa mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali Burr barazana saboda tsayawarta a gabanta, sannan ta kai rahotonsa ga Ma'aikatar Lafiya ta Jihar Washington cikin mugunta . An yi watsi da rahoton da ba bisa ƙa'ida ba, amma ya haifar da damuwa sosai.

Burr ta bayar da rantsuwar rantsuwa kan ƙarar ɓata suna da Alex Rhodes ya shigar a kan Prause, wanda ya haifar da ƙara tsananta mata da kuma ɓata mata suna (wani misali na Prause da ta shiga cikin tsoratar da shaida). A cikin ɗaya daga cikin munanan ayyukanta, Prause (BrainOnPorn) ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter cewa yunƙurin Burr na tallafawa ɗan'uwansa ɗan shekara 14, wanda a matsayinsa na ƙaramin namiji baƙar fata ana yi masa mummunan mu'amala da hukumomi, ya zama zamba (!). Prause (@BrainOnPorn) ya yi ƙoƙarin tara kuɗi don Burr don ɗan'uwansa ɗan shekara 14 da aka tsare, yana zargin Burr da yin bibiya, yana mai cewa ya kamata ya haɗu da ɗan'uwansa a gidan yari.

Yi aiki ya ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo kuma ya ɓata sunan Burr ta amfani da @BrainOnPorn. Bayan da aka dakatar da wannan laƙabi na dindindin, sai ta sauya zuwa @NicoleRPrause don yin ƙazantaccen aikinta, ta aika da tweets kusan iri ɗaya da waɗanda suka bayyana a yanzu da aka lalata @BrainOnPorn. Ta yi zargin cewa burinta ya kasance a cikin "rukuni" da ke aika barazanar kisa. Tana kwance.

Sakonni nata ba su da amfani: hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na maganganun da ba a san ko su waye ba daga masu amfani da intanet da kuma tsokaci 3 da aka ɗauka daga cikin labarin SCRAM News mai ɓata suna inda Prause ta yi ƙarya. Waɗannan ƙaryar sun kai ga ƙarar SCRAM, an ja labarin, kuma SCRAM ta fita daga kasuwanci! An tilasta wa kamfanin watsa labarai na ScramNews neman afuwa da biyan diyya mai yawa saboda buga ƙaryar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes & NoFap.

Labarin SCRAM da aka goge yanzu ya ƙunshi bayanan karya marasa tushe da aka bayar da Prause, kuma babu wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan ikirarinta. SCRAM ta yi hujja mai ban mamaki cewa saboda Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa ba ta da alaƙa da masana'antar batsa (duk da hotuna da sauran shaidu masu yawa da akasin haka), kamfen ɗin Rhodes na Donor Box don ba da kuɗaɗen ƙararsa a kan Prause ya kasance na zamba. Baya ga wannan rashin amfani da alkalami na aikin jarida, ƙungiyar SCRAM ta share sharhi a ƙarƙashin labarin lokacin da masu karatu suka yi ƙoƙarin musanta maganganun ƙarya da na ɓatanci na Prause/SCRAM tare da shaidar gaske. Waɗannan tsokaci 3 ne ke yin amfani da tweets akai-akai kuma suna ɓata suna. Duk tsokaci 3 daidai ne, suna faɗin gaskiya cewa labarin bai bayar da wata shaida ta gaske don tallafawa ikirarin Prause ba.

Yayi yawa ga daukar nauyin aikin jarida.

--------

Ta yi wa Burr alama, da kuma wasu da yawa, suna masu cewa duk suna da alhakin “barazanar barazanar” da ba a sani ba (yawancin maganganun da ta nuna ba barazanar ba ce, balle barazanar mutuwa).

--------

@BrainOnPorn ya ambaci sunayen mutane 3 da suka yi tsokaci a ƙarƙashin labarin ScramNews mai ɓata suna, wanda ba shi da shaida, wanda yanzu aka goge.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ƙasa, kodayake na toshe ta, ta yi ta murza zargina tana zargin DJ da kasancewa a cikin "rukuni" da ke da alhakin zargin da aka yi mata.

Shafuka 2,000 na abin da ake kira "ɓata suna" a zahiri, shafuka 4 ne na Farko. Ahh, abin dariya na Prause a shafin Twitter cewa na ɓata mata suna a cikin zaren da ke sanar da nasarar da na samu a shari'ar ɓata suna (har yanzu tana bin ni kuɗin kotu da hukunci).

---------

Yi aiki ya bayyana dalilin da yasa ta buƙaci yin maganganun intanet mara kyau: ƙananan maganganun da ba a san su ba za su kai ƙarar ta idan ta sanya hotunan kariyar ainihin maganganun. Da gaske? Ina shaidar take?

A'a, CSATs sun yi iƙirarin cewa labarin ScramNews bai bayar da wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan ikirarinsa ba. Tunda an kai ƙarar ScramNews a kotu, da alama ba a taɓa ba wa ScramNews wata shaida ta Prause don tallafawa ikirarinta ba.

Bugu da ƙari, tweeting bayanan ScramNews, gami da na Burr. Ta ambace ni, amma tana kwance. Ban zuga komai ba.

-------

Akwai ƙaryar da yawa don fallasa a cikin waɗannan tweets na 2 na gaba. A bayyane, tana dogaro da mabiyanta ne ba tare da karanta hotunan kariyar ba - saboda babu wanda zai goyi bayan da'awar a cikin tweets dinta.

Idan kana son gaskiya, duba takardar shaidar Burr mai shafuka 2, wacce aka shigar a cikin karar batanci ta Alex Rhodes – DJ Burr, takardar shaidar LHMC.

Ƙarya ta 1 ta Prause: Burr bai zargi Prause da kalaman wariyar launin fata ba, ya bayyana cewa ta zarge shi da amfani da kalaman wariyar launin fata. Wasu sassa biyu daga cikin gajeren bayanin Burr sun bayyana wannan a sarari:

Karya # 2 ta hanyar Yin amfani: Ta ce Gabe Deem da Gary Wilson sun zarge ta da yin amfani da kalaman wariyar launin fata. Kamar yadda kake gani Deem's tweet bai faɗi komai ba game da Yin wasa. Madadin haka, Deem ya bayyana dabarun masu yin batsa game da batsa gabaɗaya, waɗanda ke lakafta maza waɗanda suka daina batsa a matsayin masu wariyar launin fata.

Ta yi amfani da dabararta ta yau da kullun, tana da'awar cewa mun ce an yanke mata hukuncin X, Y, ko Z. Duk abin da DJ ya ce shi ne ɓata suna laifi ne. Ta sake wallafa sharhin SCRAM ( An tilasta wa ScramNews ta nemi afuwa da biyan diyya mai yawa saboda buga ƙaryar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes da NoFap ).

----

Tana shiga zarenta tana kwance game da rahoton FBI, kuma tana kwance cewa adireshinta yana kan YBOP.

Rashin amincewa da ikirarin FBI: (1) FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Prause ta yi ƙarya game da shigar da rahoton FBI kan Gary Wilson , (2) FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Nicole Prause ta yi ƙarya game da shigar da rahoto kan Alexander Rhodes.

Ta karyata ikirarinta cewa adireshinta yana kan YBOP koyaushe: https://twitter.com/YourBrainOnPorn/status/1360385094159003648.

--------

KAI! A nan, Burr ya nemi taimako game da damuwarsa kuma masanin ilimin halayyar ɗan adam mai lasisi Prause ya yi masa tambayoyi ta yanar gizo game da yawan ɓata sunanta da ta saba yi . Shin wannan ya saba wa ɗabi'ar ilimin halayyar ɗan adam?

Kariyar allo ta yau da kullun: zana zane mai ban sha'awa na sharhi daga trolls, da sharhin da ke ƙarƙashin labarin SCRAM.

Ka lura cewa tana cikin bacin rai cewa DJ ta nuna goyon baya ga rufe Pornhub.

--------

Dangane da yadda aka yi masa tambayoyi ta yanar gizo da kuma bata masa suna, Burr ya buga wannan zaren , inda ya ƙare da hanyar haɗi zuwa shafin Prause #1 (bai haɗa da ƙarar ba). Kamar yadda za ku iya gani, babu wanda ya ce an yanke wa Prause hukuncin cin zarafi (wanda a zahiri ba abu ne mai sauƙi ba, domin ƙarar bata suna guda 3 da aka shigar a kanta ta shafi na jama'a ne, ba laifi ba ne).

Dangane da ƙarar, Staci Sprout ta buga wannan (3-17-21): An tilasta wa Prause ya sasanta ƙararraki biyu daga cikin uku da aka shigar a kanta saboda ɓata mata suna.

----

Ofari da yawa daga irin waɗannan ƙarya. Dubi hoton hoton sosai; Staci sunaye PornHub, ba Yi wasa ba.

----------

Fiye da irin wannan ɓata suna - yana faɗar ƙarya cewa Burr ya iza rikici.

-----

Wani tweet ina DJ thread:

--------

Sassan masu alaƙa:

Sauran - Gudana: Gudanar da amfani @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya mai ilimin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout na “bada shawara game da kisan mata,” “tallafawa barazanar mutuwa,” “tsokanar tashin hankali,” “barazanar mata,” aika “barazanar mutuwa,” misogyny, da sauransu.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba.

Nicole Prause ta ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo wajen ɓata sunan mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout. Sha'awar Prause game da Sprout ta fara ne a shekarar 2018, lokacin da Sprout ta yi ƙarfin halin tsayayya da cin zarafin da Prause ke yi a yanar gizo. Prause ta shigar da ƙararraki uku marasa tushe ga Washington State kan mai ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali Sprout (duk an yi watsi da su gaba ɗaya). Hare-haren Prause sun ƙaru bayan da Sprout ta bayyana a cikin wani bidiyon tara kuɗi don ƙarar ɓata sunan Alex Rhodes akan Prause, kuma ta ba da tabbacin a cikin ƙarar ɓata sunan Hilton da Rhodes . Har zuwa lokacin da aka dakatar da shi har abada, Prause ta yi amfani da @BrainOnPorn Twitter don yawancin ɓata sunan ta. Sannan ta koma ga @NicolRPrause don yin aikinta na ƙazanta. Misalai da yawa suna cikin waɗannan sassan:

Wannan ɓangaren yana damuwa da kansa tare da yin amfani da labaran da ake aikawa da tweets (galibi a cikin zaren Staci) yana zarginta da aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, tunzura tashin hankali, tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, da makamantansu. Kamar yadda yake tare da sassan da suka gabata, Yin wasa ba ya ba da hujja don tallafawa waɗannan ƙaryar. Yi amfani da tweets na kullun cewa ta shigar da policean sanda ko rahoton FBI akan waɗanda aka ambata a cikin ɓatancin ta a cikin tweets ɗin ta. Abin dariya, yadda tilasta bin doka ba zai taɓa tuntuɓar ɗayanmu ba.

Kamar yadda yake tare da ɗaruruwan wasu tweets ɗin nata, Yi amfani da wasu maganganun da ba a san su ba ta hanyar intanet, yana nufin kowannensu a matsayin "barazanar mutuwa," kuma yana zargin abubuwan da ta saba da su na aikawa ko tallafawa waɗannan "barazanar mutuwa."

A cikin wannan sakon ta zargi Stef Carnes, Linda Hatch da Staci Sprout da tallafawa barazanar mutuwa. Me duka 3 suke da shi iri ɗaya? Sun gabatar da takaddun shaida a cikin karar lalata da Prause!

Takaddama:

Rana daya, irin wannan batanci.

Kwana daya. Wannan lokacin Yi amfani da tweets a cikin mutum na 3. @BrainOnPorn yayi ikirarin cewa imel daga Sprout ne, amma ba haka bane. @BrainOnPorn shima ya ta'allaka ne game da abun cikin imel.

Kuma, a ranar 1 ga Oktoba, 2020. Kuma, hotunan kariyar kwamfuta ba su yi daidai da sakon @BrainOnPorn game da su ba. Laila ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter cewa ta yi barazanar kisa saboda yin katsalandan don a gudanar da bincike kan Pornhub, kuma Sprout ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter damuwarta da goyon bayanta.

Ku tuna cewa PornHub shine asusun farko da ya sake yin tweet na farko na @BrainOnPorn! Wannan yana ba da shaida bayyananne game da haɗin gwiwa a bayan fage tsakanin RealYBOP da masana'antar batsa (Mindgeek). Duk da cewa kusan kowane tweet na @BrainOnPorn ya goyi bayan ajandar masana'antar batsa, tweets ɗin da ke nan ba su da wata shakka game da amincin RealYBOP - yana tallafawa masana'antar batsa kai tsaye - musamman PornHub.

A wannan rana, @BrainOnPorn ya karyata , irin waɗannan maganganun da ba su da alaƙa da troll.

Baya ga hotunan allo na maganganun da ba a san ko su waye ba daga masu amfani da intanet, sakonnin da Prause ke amfani da su akai-akai galibi suna ɗauke da tsokaci 3 da aka ɗauka daga cikin labarin SCRAM News mai ɓata suna inda Prause ya yi ƙarya. Waɗannan ƙaryar sun haifar da ƙarar SCRAM, an ja labarin, kuma SCRAM ta fita daga kasuwanci! Kamfanin watsa labarai na ScramNews ya tilasta wa ScramNews neman afuwa da biyan diyya mai yawa saboda buga ƙaryar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes & NoFap.

Labarin SCRAM da aka goge yanzu ya ƙunshi bayanan karya marasa tushe da aka bayar da Prause, kuma babu wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan ikirarinta. SCRAM ta yi hujja mai ban mamaki cewa saboda Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa ba ta da alaƙa da masana'antar batsa (duk da hotuna da sauran shaidu masu yawa da akasin haka), kamfen ɗin Rhodes na Donor Box don ba da kuɗi ga ƙararsa a kan Prause ya kasance na zamba. Baya ga wannan rashin amfani da alkalami na aikin jarida, ƙungiyar SCRAM ta share sharhi a ƙarƙashin labarin lokacin da masu karatu suka yi ƙoƙarin musanta maganganun ƙarya da na ɓatanci na Prause/SCRAM tare da shaidar gaske. Waɗannan tsokaci 3 ne ke yin amfani da tweets akai-akai kuma suna ɓata suna. Duk tsokaci 3 daidai ne, suna faɗin gaskiya cewa labarin SCRAM bai ba da wata hujja ta gaske don tallafawa iƙirarin Prause ba.

Bugu da ƙari, Staci, Jan da DJ sun faɗi daidai cewa labarin ba shi da wata hujja don tallafawa da'awarta.

Karin bayani daga 1 ga Oktoba, 2020: @BrainOnPorn ta wallafa a shafinta na Twitter cewa laifinta ya ta'allaka ne a ƙarƙashin ɗaya daga cikin abokan hulɗar kasuwanci na Staci: 1) Ba a kori Sprout daga SASH ba, 2) Sprout ba ta taɓa faɗin komai game da "shagaltuwa da batsa ba," 3) Staci ba ta taɓa yin ƙarya game da "barazanar kisa ba."

-------

Kwanaki kaɗan bayan haka. Haka nan hotunan fasehoods da hotunan kariyar kwamfuta. Na yi matukar damuwa game da SCRAMNews . Alamun NASW da ke nuna cewa ya kamata Sprout ta rasa lasisinta.

Rana guda, fasehoods iri daya. Wannan lokacin a karkashin sanarwar taron koli don dawo da mata masu lalata da lalata.

Ka lura da kalmomin ban mamaki "don hana mace masanin kimiyya samun tallafi." Don haka, sharhi, a ƙarƙashin maras hujja, labarin SCRAM cike da ƙarya, wanda aka share a cikin fewan awanni kaɗan, ya hana Fuskantar samun tallafi? Nah.

Rana guda, maganganun PT iri ɗaya, ƙarin ƙarya, da yiwa SASH alama. Gaskiya - Sprout bai mallaki “kwafin barazanar mutuwa ba.” Ba kuma wanda ya yarda da share tsokaci.

-------

Qarya iri daya.

-------

Cyberstalking yacigaba gobe, sanya kowane sunan Staci ya bayyana

A rana guda, a ƙarƙashin sanarwar taron koli don mata masu lalata da batsa, inda Sprout ta kasance mai gabatarwa. Haƙiƙa ɓoye ɓarna.

Kwana daya.

--------

Karya iri daya, hotunan kariyar kwamfuta mara ma'ana. Bugu da ƙari, a ƙarƙashin tweet inganta taron koli wanda ke nuna Sprout.

Rana guda, karya iri ɗaya da kuma hotunan allo marasa ma'ana. Bugu da ƙari, a ƙarƙashin tweet inganta taron koli wanda ke nuna Sprout.

--------

Kashegari, ƙarya ɗaya ne da hotunan kariyar da ba ma'ana.

---------

Bugu da ƙari, a ƙarƙashin tweet inganta taron koli wanda ke nuna Sprout.

-------

Kisa? Mahaukaci. Gaskiya sharrin psychopathic.

Watanni 6 ke nan daga baya kuma har yanzu “labarin ƙasa” bai bayyana ba.

------

Sanya bayanan karya a tweet daya. Cyberstalking a cikin zaren Sprout

Kwana daya.

Kwana daya.

A rana guda, ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo. Babu wata hanya don tallafawa ƙaryar Prause.

Rana guda (10/12/20), hotunan allo iri ɗaya.

-------

Da'awar hauka ta Yin amfani.

Sprout bai sani ba, saboda babu wani abin sani.

-------

A ranar 13 ga Oktoba, @BrainOnPorn ya wallafa sakonni 15 a shafin Twitter na bata sunan Sprout. Zamu fara da ɗayan kookiest. Gunawa ya ce Sprout yana ba da shawara don kashe mata. Yana samun mahaukaci tare da kowace rana.

Kwana daya. Amincewa ya tambayi mabiya suyi rahoto game da tara kudin Alex zuwa Pennsylvania.

Duk kuɗin sun tafi kuɗin shari'a. Duba- An Tilasta wa Prause Ya Sasanta Shari'o'i Biyu Daga Cikin Uku Da Aka Yi Mata Saboda Bata Suna

Bayanan intanet marasa mahimmanci:

Kwana daya. Ya ce Ya kamata a cire Sprout daga kulawa da haƙuri.

Mutumin da ya yiwa kanta lahani shine Prause. Yawancin lokuta da aka rubuta:

Ya ci gaba:

Yanzu har da Stefanie Carnes. Abin da ake kira "haɗin kai" an rantse da wadata

Kira Sprout mai ban tsoro da Hilton ɗan damun batsa. Sprout ya ce "zai gan ka ya mutu." KASHE

Barazana da barazanar kisa. Hotunan kariyar kwamfuta sun dace da karar batanci na Hilton. Babu wani abu a can game da rayuwar jima'i, ba shakka.

Tags tsiro:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Karya ta Prause: (1) Sprout ba ta taɓa yaɗa adireshin Prause ba. (2) Sabuwar ƙirƙira ta Prause ita ce na saka adireshinta a YBOP, kuma an kai mata hari a can. Adireshinta bai taɓa kasancewa a YBOP ba. A gaskiya ma ta yarda cewa ba a taɓa sanya adireshinta a ko'ina ba . Kai.

-------

Sprout ba yana nufin Fuskantarwa ba, kuma bai taɓa faɗi cewa ba a zalunci Fuse ba.

Kwana daya. Haka karya.

-------

Ban yaɗa adireshinta ba, kuma ba ta nuna wata hujja da na bayar ba.

Rana guda (2/9/21), karya ɗaya ce:

Kwana guda, tsoho ɗaya.

A cikin wannan zaren, Yi da'awar ikirarin YBOP yana da 2, ooo shafukan "ɓata suna." YBOP yana da manyan shafuka 4 masu amfani da kuma 5 RealYBOP shafuka masu ɗauke da ɓatanci na cin zarafi da yawa.

A cikin zaren Sprout. Darling baya siya mata karya:

--------

Ba shi da wata ma'ana.

------

Na toshe Prause, duk da haka tana ta zagin zaren labarina, tana ɓata sunan Sprout da ni. Shaidar Prause ƙarya ce.

------

Kodayake Sprout ya toshe ta, Prause ya shiga zaren Sprout a ƙarƙashin wani tweet.

------

Babu ƙungiyar DJ Burr. Duk BS.

Hoton da aka saka a hoton ya ce Pornhub, ba Prause ba. Duk da haka, Prause yana da alaƙa da yawa da waɗanda ke cikin masana'antar batsa - Shin Masana'antar Batsa Ta Shafi Nicole Prause?

------

-------

A cikin zaren Staci

------

Yin hira tare da duk sauran masana'antun batsa shills, da da'awar ƙarya cewa ni ke da alhakin dakatar da asusun na ɗan lokaci.

Jima'i yana kwance, kamar yadda ga abin da na faɗa game da harinta:

A ƙarshen shekarar 2020, ba zato ba tsammani ta fara iƙirarin cewa an yi mata fyade a shekarar 2019, kuma ni ne ke da alhakin abin da ba a sani ba. Ta yi iƙirarin ƙarya cewa na saka adireshinta a YBOP kuma hakan ya sa wani saurayi ya kama ta a kan titi da skateboard. Ba ta bayar da wata shaida ta gaskiya ba cewa na saka adireshinta na zahiri ko kuma an kama ta.

Kamar yadda aka rubuta a wannan sashe da kuma wasu wurare , ƙaryar da Prause ta fi so ita ce na saka adireshinta a YBOP. Kwanan nan ta ƙara wa labarinta na tatsuniya, tana da'awar cewa wani saurayi ya kama ta "a adireshin YBOP." Sanin cewa wannan ƙarya ce, na ci gaba da buƙatar ta samar da hoton allo wanda ke tabbatar da adireshinta yana kan YBOP. Tunda ba za ta iya ba, Prause ta koma buga hoton allo na jerin abubuwan da ta gabatar daga ƙara ta biyu ^da ta sha kashi a gare ni . Abin takaici a gare ta, dokokin kotu sun buƙaci Prause ta ba ni duk abubuwan da ta gabatar kafin zaman sauraron ƙarar (kamar yadda dole ne in ba ta duk takarduna). Duba: Fabrairu, 2021: Prause ta buga tweets 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 da ƙarya tana cewa na sanya adireshinta a kan YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a cikin 2020 Prause ta yi tweet cewa babu wanda, ciki har da ni, ke da ainihin adireshinta. Karyace-karyacenta ba su dace ba (takardu na tweets bayan kwanaki 5).

----------

3 tweets ta sake yin bayanin sake zarginta na karya game da Staci yayin da ta ke yanar gizo tana yin tweets tana wulakanta Pornhub.

RE: Bayan tweets - Ban taɓa cewa Prause tana ƙarya game da cin zarafinta ba (duk da cewa ita maƙaryaciya ce mai cutarwa, mai ɓata suna, kuma mai amfani da yanar gizo). Na ce tana ƙarya game da cin zarafin da aka yi a wani adireshin da aka sanya a YBOP: Fabrairu, 2021: Prause ta wallafa tweets 70 cikin kwanaki 5 da ƙarya tana cewa na sanya adireshinta a YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a 2020 Prause ta wallafa tweet cewa babu wanda, ciki har da ni, ke da ainihin adireshinta. Karyace-karyacenta ba su dace ba (takardun tweets bayan kwanaki 5).

Cyberstalking don Pornhub, kuma. Wannan lokacin haɗin gwiwa tare da Daraktan Sadarwa na FSC (@Bbchausa), Mike Stabile.

Ba karo na 1 da tayi aiki tare da FSC ba:

Cyberstalking a tweet disparaging Pornhub. Karyata zargin Laila da yin "korafin barazanar masu laifi"

Da alama Prause tana magana ne game da haramcin da ta yi a twitter, inda wani ya ba da rahotonta game da yin barazanar tashin hankali - Maris, 2021: An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na ɗan lokaci saboda "rubutu kan barazanar tashin hankali" . Tana ƙarya, saboda twitter ba ta taɓa bayyana wanda ya yi rahoton ba. Ba za ta iya daina yin ƙarya ba, ko da kuwa duk twitter sun sani.

---------

Retweets mai cin mutunci Staci tweet

--------

Tallafawa batsahub ta hanyar yanar gizo. Sake yin tweeting Staci tweet.

Na ce - Fabrairu, 2021: An yi wa Prause rubutu sau 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 da karya suna cewa na sanya adireshinta a YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a 2020 Prause ta yi wa Twitter cewa babu wanda, ciki har da ni, ke da ainihin adireshinta. Karyata ba ta dace ba (takardun tweets sun wuce kwanaki 5).

Supportarin goyan baya ga Mindgeek ta hanyar lalata Laila da Staci Sprout (sake aiko da sakon tweet game da Staci).

Labarai, sake aiko da sakonnin Sprout a cikin tweet.

Rana guda - 3 a jere suna taushe Staci. Same gaji karya.

-----------

Sauran hanyoyin haɗin da suka dace:

Oktoba 23, 2020: An dakatar da asusun batsa na masana'antar batsa ta Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) har abada don zalunci da zagi da niyya.
Rubutun kansa na Sprout - CIKIN MULKI, CIKINSA DA KYAUTA DAGA CIKIN SAUKI A CIKIN SAUKI CIKIN SAUKI NA GWAMNATI
Takardar shaidar Sprout a cikin karar bata sunan Alex Rhodes - Nunin # 10: Staci Sprout, LCSW affidavit (15 shafuffuka).
A kan Maris 26, 2020 An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na dan lokaci saboda tursasawa da aka yi da kuma "sanya barazanar mai karfi"

Sauran - Yi Amfani (@BrainOnPorn) zargin ƙarya mai ilimin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout na kasancewa mai adawa da LGBTQ, tallafawa eugenics, yana cewa "trans ba mutane bane," yana cewa aure "ya kamata kawai ya kasance tsakanin mace da namiji"

Kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin sassan da suka gabata, An yi amfani da yanar gizo ta hanyar yin lalata da lalata sunan Sprout saboda (1) Sprout ya gabatar da takaddun shaida a cikin karar Hilton da Rhodes, (2) Sprout ya gabatar da tarin mutane na Alex Rhodes don kwat da wando, (3) Sprout ya kare sauran wadanda aka cutar da harin Prause . Kamar yadda yake tare da sassan da suka gabata Tweets ɗin tweets sun cika da ƙarairayi da sifili na ainihi. A zahiri, Sprout yana ci gaba a siyasance kuma yana matukar tallafawa al'ummar LGBTQ.

Kamar yawancin tweets na Prause / @ BrainOnPorn, suna haɗi zuwa bidiyon da aka kirkira wanda aka haɗu tare, maganganun da Don Hilton yayi. Tweets na Prause bai dace da abin da bidiyon ya ƙunsa ba, kuma bidiyon ba ya yin daidai da ainihin abin da Hilton ya faɗa ko mahallin kalaman nasa.

------

Babu wani abu a cikin hotunan kariyar kwamfuta da ke goyan bayan tweet na cin mutuncin tweet. Mugu.

--------

Mummunan karairayi yaci gaba.

------

Praus yana kwance. Hilton ba ya yin shawarwari game da kwalliya.

--------

Varin ƙarya.

----

A'a, Sprout bai taɓa yin shaida a madadin eugenics ba. Menene gaba, Sprout ke da alhakin Holocaust?

A wannan rana. Barka da zuwa, na yi takaicin cewa Sprout ya yi imani da Hilton . Duk mun yarda da Hilton.

Kuma a ranar 12 ga Oktoba. Kuma, ina yiwa Ƙungiyar Ma'aikatan Jin Daɗi ta Ƙasa ( NASW ) alama. Hilton bai faɗi waɗannan abubuwan ba.

-------

Karya. Ba a taɓa da'awar Yin wasa yana cikin batsa ba (lura babu wani hoton hoto, ba shakka). Hilton bai taba faɗan waɗannan abubuwan ba.

A ranar 26 ga Maris, 2020, an dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na ɗan lokaci saboda cin zarafi da kuma "rubutu kan barazanar tashin hankali"

---------

Gudana: Yin amfani da amfani BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin likitan kwantar da hankali Linda Hatch, PhD na "Barazanar kashe ta," "tallafawa & tsokanar barazanar mutuwa," aikata karyar, "yin shiru ga masana kimiyya" kuma a wani bangare ke da alhakin harbe-harben parlour na tausa.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba.

Batanci da cin zarafin da Prause ta yi wa Linda Hatch ya fara ne a shekarar 2013, a matsayin martani ga rubutun da Hatch ya rubuta a shafinsa na yanar gizo, wanda ya karyata ƙaryar da Prause ta yi game da bincikenta na EEG mai lahani ( Steele et al ., 2013): Kafafen Yaɗa Labarai Masu Rashin Informed Sun Yi Nazarin Jarabawar Jima'i ta Bogus . Hatch ta kasance a gaba yayin da takardu 8 da takwarorinta suka yi bita suka fallasa irin waɗannan fannoni na binciken: Sukar da Steele et al. , 2013 suka yi wa takwarorinsu bita . Hatch ya biyo bayan wannan da wasu labarai biyu masu kyau da suka ambaci Steele et al ., 2013: Kada ku kira shi Jima'i Mai Yawan Juna Biyu: Dalilin da yasa muke buƙatar Kalmar Jarabawar Jima'i da Jarabawar Jima'i ta Bogus "Cece-Cece" da Masu Sayar da Jahilci.

A matsayin ramuwar gayya ga Hatch da ya fallasa Prause a matsayin wanda ya yi kuskuren binciken da kuma sakamakon Steele et al ., Prause ya sami lauya a shagonsa don ya aika wa Hatch takardar dakatarwa da dainawa ta ƙarya. Duba - Kira da rufe mutane da buƙatun "babu hulɗa" na ƙarya da kuma wasiƙun Cease & Desist na ƙarya (Linda Hatch, Rob Weiss, Gabe Deem, Gary Wilson, Marnia Robinson, Alex Rhodes, da sauransu) . Prause ya aika da C&Ds yayin da wasu ke aika katunan ranar haihuwa (kimanin C&Ds na bogi goma daga Prause sun yi mini hari).

Harafin C & D na Prause ya tafi ga duk wanda yayi shakkar ikirarin nata. Tana samarda su tare da hadin gwiwar lauyanta. Ba su daga kotu. Da alama suna da niyyar dakile zargi da muhawara ta gaskiya. Daga nan sai ta yi amfani da waɗannan C & D ɗin don ƙirƙirar ruɗu da wasiƙun “hukuma” don “tabbatar” wa ƙawayenta cewa mugayen mutane suna damun ta (duk da cewa iƙirarin haruffan ba hujja ba ce kuma an cika su ne kawai). A takaice, C & Ds nata wani bangare ne na yakin neman zabe mai dauke da fasaha. Ta kuma aika kwafin su ga 'yan jarida don karya musu gwiwa daga tuntubar wadanda aka cutar da su.

Daga ƙarshe Prause ta shigar da ƙarar ƙarya a kan Hatch ga Hukumar Ilimin Halayyar ɗan Adam ta California. An yi watsi da ita. Duk wannan an bayyana shi a cikin rantsuwar rantsuwar Hatch - Yuli, 2019: Linda Hatch, shaidar PhD: ƙarar cin mutuncin Donald Hilton akan Nicole R Prause.

Za mu fara da @BrainOnPorn (Prause) muna tweeting cewa IITAP, Stefanie Carnes, Staci Sprout da Linda Hatch (@saresource) duk "suna goyon bayan barazanar kisa." Tweets sun ƙunshi irin waɗannan maganganun marasa ma'ana daga trolls na intanet waɗanda ba su da alaƙa da Hatch ta kowace hanya.

"Nuna kimiyya"? Ta danganta zuwa takardar ra'ayi ta 'yan uwanta "ƙwararru " na RealYBOP.

------

Accarairayi suna zargin Hatch da “barazanar kashe ta” da kuma yi wa forungiyar Personabi'a da Ilimin Halayyar Jama'a ƙarya.

Kuma, ta danganta da takardar ra'ayi ta 'yan uwanta RealYBOP "masana ." Imel ɗin Hatch na gaskiya na 2015 zuwa ga Society for Personality and Social Psychology ya bayyana damuwa mai inganci game da aikin Prause (ku tuna, Prause ta yi kuskuren yin nazarinta na 2013 ga manema labarai ).

-------

Arin yin magana da yanar gizo, ɓata suna iri ɗaya.

------

"Barazanar kisa da aka goyi baya" wataƙila ɓata suna ne domin yana nuna aikata laifuka.

-------

Ya ce Hatch ya yi barazanar kashe mutane. Zargin wani da laifi ƙarya ɓata suna ne kawai . Hotunan hotunan suna da irin wannan sharhin intanet. Karantawa koyaushe yana rubutu.

-------

Tallafawa barazanar kashe su? ” Gyada kawai.

-------

Ban yi komai ba sai ƙarya. Ban buga komai daga Linda Hatch ba. Babu wanda ya yi rantsuwar ƙarya sai dai Prause . Duba - Stephanie Carnes, PhD (shaidar #7)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nope, Ban buga da'awar "jiya" ta Linda Hatch ba.

-------

Babu rantsuwar ƙarya - Yuli, 2019: Linda Hatch, shaidar PhD: Shari'ar cin zarafi ta Donald Hilton akan Nicole R Prause.

-------

Karyar da'awar Hatch ta haifar da barazanar mutuwa, amma tare da karkatarwa: zargin laifin harbe-harben da aka yi a Atlanta a kan Hatch. Yaya munin hakan?

A ranar 26 ga Maris, 2020, an dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) saboda cin zarafi da kuma "rubutu kan barazanar tashin hankali"

Gudana: Yin amfani da amfani BrainOnPorn kuma @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya da NCOSE na “goyan bayan eugenics, "" tallafawa tashin hankali & ingiza barazanar mutuwa, "" kasancewa kungiyar kiyayya, "kasancewa Anti-LGBT, da kuma tunzura harbe-harben da ake yi a Atlanta.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba.

Cibiyar Ƙasa kan Cin Zarafin Jima'i (NCOSE) wata manufa ce da aka saba yi wa Prause da sunayenta. Wannan sashe yana nuna sakonnin Twitter masu tayar da hankali da ɓata suna da Prause ke zargin NCOSE da aika ko haɓaka barazanar kisa, bin diddigi da kisan kai.

Bari mu fara da karyar cewa @BrainOnPorn ya ce NCOSE masu tallafawa masu tsattsauran ra'ayi waɗanda suka yi barazanar kashe duk wanda (Fushin yana bin Alex Rhodes).

--------

A karkashin tweet din Mataimakin Shugaban NCOSE Haley McNamara game da zanga-zangar Pornhub (@BrainOnPorn koyaushe yana wurin don bata sunan wadanda ke magana mara dadi game da masana'antar batsa). Karya ya bayyana cewa NCOSE yana goyan bayan barazanar mutuwa.

-------

Haƙƙarfan mahaukaci cewa NCOSE yana goyan bayan eugenics. (Yi waƙa ya haɗu tare kaɗan daga cikin maganganun mahallin da Don Hilton - amma bai taɓa faɗin wani abu kamar @BrainOnPorn ya bayyana ba.)

-------

Wasu karin tweets guda biyu cike da karya suna da'awar cewa membobin kwamitin sun bayyana cewa yakamata mutane 'yan LGBT su kasance da zama. Oh don Allah

Hakanan BS

---------

Defarin ɓata suna - “tallafawa tashin hankali.”

-------

Tags NCOSE, suna cewa su da sauran mutane ya kamata suyi sihiri su san maganganun kan layi, kuma suyi tir da waɗannan maganganun bazuwar. A gaskiya, yana da Furuciya wanda ke buƙatar yin tir da ƙazantar sa, maganganun kan layi.

--------

Liesarin ƙarya da tsarkakakkun abubuwa. Staci Sprout ba mai magana da yawun kowane rukuni bane, gami da NCOSE.

-------

Sanya zaren 48-tweet. "Barin Nofap, NCOSE, YBOP." Menene ma'anar hakan? Ationsarin zarge-zargen ɓata suna.

-------

Bore tare da sanya maganganun ɓatanci na yau da kullun, @BrainOnPorn yana duba asusun mu na Twitter. Kamar dai muna sarrafa mabiya.

-------

Varamar ƙarya ɗaya.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Abin ƙyama tweet. Gunawa ya ce NCOSE da Laila sun zuga kashe-kashe a ɗakin taro na Maris, 2021 Atlanta. Wani bugun EJ Dickson, wanda ke dauke da "gwani" daya: David Ley.

--------

Yana zargin Laila da haddasa rikici da barazanar aikata laifi. Har yanzu jiran shaida.

--------

Hakanan tsohuwar ƙaryar. Tana matukar damuwa da kungiyoyi masu daukar batsa.

------

Tweeting a karkashin Haley Halverson na NCOSE. Gunaguni ya fusata yayin da ake kushe shi don ɓatar da yanayin bincike a bidiyon Peterson. Gunaguni ya zargi Haley da tunzura barazanar mutuwa. BS

--------

Shiga Haɗin Haɗin Maganar Kyauta a ƙoƙari mara ƙarfi don ƙasƙantar da NCOSE. Me ya sa? Saboda NCOSE tana tallafawa waɗanda ke fama da cutar ta batsah a doka.

FSC da Pornhub na gode.

--------

A ranar 26 ga Maris, 2020, an dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na ɗan lokaci saboda "rubutu kan barazanar tashin hankali"

Yi amfani da amfani BrainOnPorn da kuma @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya Stefanie Carnes, PhD na "aikata ƙarya," "barazanar kashe masana kimiyya," "hada kai don kare mai tayar da hankali," "tallafawa & tsoratar da barazanar mutuwa," "ƙoƙarin hallaka ta," kuma a wani ɓangare na da alhakin don harbe-harben parlourn Atlanta.

Wannan yana ɗaya daga cikin sassa da yawa da ke tattara bayanai game da kamfen ɗin Prause wanda ta zarge zaɓaɓɓun maƙasudinta da aika barazanar kisa, ko tallafawa barazanar kisa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar kisa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaida da ke goyon bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba. Wannan sashe yana magana ne game da wani babban burin Prause, Stefanie Carnes, PhD. Carnes ita ce shugabar IITAP, babbar ƙungiya da ke ba da takardar shaidar masu ilimin jima'i (takardar shaidar IITAP CSAT ce). Yayin da yawancin tweets na Prause da Ley ke ɓata wa CSATs da IITAP rai (kamar wannan na gaba), wannan sashe zai haskaka tweets da yawa na ɓatanci da Prause ke yi.

A kan shafin Prause (@BrainOnPorn) tweets masu ban mamaki. Hotunan da ke ƙasa suna da irin waɗannan maganganu guda huɗu masu ɓatanci daga trolls marasa suna waɗanda Prause ya saka a cikin ɗaruruwan wasu tweets. @BrainOnPorn ya zargi Carnes da yin barazanar kashe masana kimiyya. Lura: A cikin wannan, da kuma tweets ɗin da suka biyo baya, @BrainOnPorn ya haɗa zuwa wani ra'ayi na memba na RealYBOP Josh Grubbs. Saboda Grubbs ya yi imanin cewa har yanzu ba a "inganta" magungunan jarabar jima'i iri-iri ba, @BrainOnPorn/Prause ta wallafa cewa Stefanie Carne ta aikata rantsuwar ƙarya a cikin takardar shaidarta game da ƙarar batanci ta Hilton . Ba shi da ma'ana.

Yana da Prause wanda ya aikata halaye da yawa na shaidar zur:

-------

Da'awar batanci cewa Stefanie Carnes yana goyan bayan barazanar mutuwa:

-------

Lakabi IITAP, wanda ke nuna cewa IITAP tana aika barazanar kisa. Hotunan allo suna cikin haruffa 3 da aka tattara don ƙarar da ta yi min da ba ta yi nasara ba . Babu wanda ya ambaci barazanar kisa. Marubutan wasiƙar suna maimaita abin da Prause ya faɗa musu, wanda duk ƙarya ce.

A ranar 8 ga Oktoba, 2020, Prause ta yi amfani da wani tweet mai tsawon 20 na yanar gizo , tana shiga cikin zaren CSATs da masu ilimin jima'i, suna ta ƙara ƙaryarta.

Anan ana zargin IITAP da laifin “lalata masana kimiyya.”

Yin amfani da @BrainOnPorn yana ƙaryata ƙarya. Gaskiya: Yuli, 2019: Stefanie Carnes, shaidar PhD: ƙarar Donald Hilton kan Nicole R Prause & Liberos LLC.

Cyberstalking CSATs – suna da'awar ƙarya cewa Carnes ya yi rantsuwar ƙarya . Ya ambaci abokin RealYBOP kuma abokinsa Josh Grubbs.

A nan Yi amfani da CSATs na yanar gizo - yana da'awar ƙarya cewa Carnes ya aikata rantsuwar ƙarya . Ya ambaci abokinsa kuma abokinsa Josh Grubbs. Abin mamaki, ya yi iƙirarin cewa Carnes "na iya ƙoƙarin halaka ka":

Karyata ikirarin Carnes na aikata rantsuwar ƙarya:

Labarin da Yayi amfani da mummunan rahoto ga SASH mujallar BA a gyara ba. Endarin bayanan kawai ya ba da rahoton wani ƙarancin gyara, wanda ba shi da tasiri a kan sakamako ko ƙarshe.

Rana daya, karya daya ce.

Rana daya, karya daya ce. Babu shaidar da aka bayar game da duk wanda aka kaiwa hari.

A rana ɗaya, ƙarya ɗaya ce. DARVO.

A rana ɗaya, ƙarya ɗaya ce. DARVO.

A wannan rana, ƙarya iri ɗaya tana da'awar rantsuwar ƙarya.

A wannan rana, ƙarya iri ɗaya tana da'awar rantsuwar ƙarya.

A wannan rana, ƙarya iri ɗaya har yanzu tana da'awar rantsuwar ƙarya.

Mai Dacewa - Yuli, 2019: Linda Hatch, shaidar PhD: Karar cin mutuncin Donald Hilton akan Nicole R Prause & Liberos LLC.

A wannan rana, ƙarya iri ɗaya har yanzu tana da'awar rantsuwar ƙarya.

A wannan rana, irin waɗannan ƙaryar har yanzu suna da'awar shaidar ƙarya . Haka kuma suna ƙaryar cewa IITAP "tana da hannu a cikin ƙarar."

A wannan rana, ƙarya iri ɗaya har yanzu tana da'awar rantsuwar ƙarya.

Prause ta wallafa wani ƙarin bayani a shafinta na Twitter game da wani bincike da ta bayar da rahoto a mujallar cikin mugunta. Ƙarin bayanin ya bayyana cewa ƙananan gyare-gyaren ba su da wani tasiri a kan sakamakon. Cin zarafin da Prause ta yi wa mujallar da marubutan ya yi yawa sosai, wanda ya sa ɗaya daga cikin marubutan ya gabatar da rantsuwar rantsuwa da ke nuna halayen da ba su dace ba na Prause - Bradley Green, PhD (affidavit #6).

Yayi daidai da tweet.

Ya yi daidai da abin da ya gabata a tweet, amma tare da wata maganar da aka kirkira, watau, cewa Carnes ya “yi wa masu sukar 100 barazana da karar.” Maganar banza.

Kwana daya. Harin CSATs.

Ofarshen ranar 8 ga Oktoba, ashirin da cika cike da tweet rampage.

---------

Don haka, duk mun yi wa kanmu rantsuwar ƙarya, a jihohi 3 bisa ga Dokar Prause. Gaskiya? Kotuna sun gano cewa Dokar Prause ta yi ƙarya: Nasarorin shari'a akan mai cin zarafi/ba'a Nicole Prause: Ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka zalunta ba!

Kwana guda, yin amfani da yanar gizo CSATs:

Rana mai zuwa. Haka karya.

-------

Ya fara aiki a ranar 13 ga Oktoba da sakonni 6 da aka wallafa a shafin Twitter. Babu wanda ya shigar da ƙara a kaina. Na shigar da ƙara ga Hukumar Ilimin Halayyar Dan Adam ta CA saboda yawancin abin da aka rubuta a nan. Hukumar ta ga ya dace ta gudanar da bincike na tsawon shekaru 3. A ƙarshe, Hukumar ta yanke shawarar kin ɗaukar mataki saboda munanan ayyukan Prause sun faru ne a wajen aikinta na ilimin halayyar ɗan adam. Wannan ba wai wanke abubuwan da aka gabatar a cikin ƙarata ba ne.

Cyberstalking Carnes, tana cewa ta yi haɗin gwiwa da wani mai cin zarafi, wanda da alama Prause yana faɗa Donald Hilton ne. Duk ƙarya, wanda ya haifar da ƙara: Shari'ar ɓatanci ta Donald Hilton akan Nicole Prause: Za a iya sauke PDF na shari'ar Hilton, nuni, da kuma shaidu daga wasu mutane 9 da aka yi wa Prause.

Ko da Hilton ya kai mata ƙara, ta sake ɓata masa suna. Mai karatu a hankali. Bai yi mata kyau ba – An shigar da ƙarar fatara don guje wa ɗaukar alhakin ƙarar bata suna guda 3 da ba a yi musu shari'a ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc) kuma ta guji biyan ni bashin lauya da ta ci (a nasarar da na samu a Anti-SLAPP)

Suna zarge ni da yin bibiya. Suna aika wasiƙun ƙarya daga David Ley da tsohon mai RealYBOP, Daniel Burgess.

Ƙari ga haka. Wataƙila yana nufin Don Hilton, wanda ya kai ƙararta.

#6 na 13 ga Oktoba, 2020. Mutum ɗaya tilo da ya yi rantsuwar ƙarya shine Prause.

-----

Accusarin zarge-zarge na shaidar zur, tare da hotunan kariyar kwamfuta / hanyoyin da ba su dace ba.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mugu. Yi amfani sannan ta yi amfani da asusunta na Twitter don nuna cewa IITAP na iya zama alhakin kisan gillar da aka yi a Atlanta. Oh don Allah

-------

Sauran - Gudana: Gudanar da amfani @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya da Ƙungiyar don Ci gaban Harkokin Jima'i (SASH) na "yunƙurin lalata rashin amincewa ta kowane hali," "tallafawa mutuwa & barazanar doka," "tallafawa tsinkaye na Prause," "da'awar cewa Pornhub ne ya ba ta kuɗi," da "tallafawa eugenics."

Ofaya daga cikin abubuwanda aka fi so shine SASH, ƙungiyar masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali. Tweets din da ke kasa wasu kadan ne daga sama da yiwa 100 alama ko sanya SASH.

A nan, ta ƙirƙiro hoton waɗanda aka zalunta don mayar da martani ga Alexander Rhodes (wanda ya kafa reddit/nofap da NoFap.com ) da ke shigar da ƙarar ɓata suna a kanta. Da alama Prause yana nuna (a zahiri) cewa SASH tana wallafa barazanar kisa a gidan yanar gizon White Supremacy! Tabbas, babu hoton da ke nuna barazanar kisa da ake zargin an yi.

Lura - A ranar 11 ga Nuwamba, kafin sanarwar NoFap game da ƙarar da kuma tara kuɗi, Prause ta fara wallafa a shafinta na Twitter da zargin cewa ta sami barazanar kisa.

----------

Babu wani abu a cikin wannan sakon na gaba da yake gaskiya. Sprout, IITAP da SASH ba su taɓa cewa Pornhub ne ke daukar nauyin Prause ba. Kuna iya ganin cewa hotunan hotunan tweets na Sprout ba sa da'awar cewa Pornhub ne ke daukar nauyin Prause. Suna cewa Prause yana jin daɗin masana'antar batsa, wanda gaskiya ne: Shin Masana'antar Batsa Ta Shafi Nicole Prause? Kuma "su" (SASH, IITAP) ba su tabbatar da cewa "Staci Sprout yana ƙarya ba." Babu hoton allo yana nufin Prause shine wanda ke karya.

---------

A cikin wannan tweet din ta yi zargin karya SASH na mara min baya a laifukan da ban aikata ba.

Gaskiya? Ta sanya watakila tweets 100 na karyar da'awar cewa na yi wa kaina rauni a cikin jihohi 3. A zahiri, Gwadawa ta la'anci kanta sau da yawa a cikin shigar da kara a kotu kuma a cikin kararraki biyu da ta ɓace mini. Duba:

Dangane da zargin "bin diddigin," kotun ta yanke hukuncin cewa tana ƙarya: Kokarin Prause na yin shiru da Wilson ya ci tura; an hana umarnin hana ta a matsayin abin da ba shi da amfani kuma tana bin manyan kuɗaɗen lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP.

Game da rahotannin FBI da ta yi iƙirarin yi, FBI ba ta yarda da Prause ba: Nuwamba, 2018: FBI ta tabbatar da zamba ta Nicole Prause game da da'awar batanci (Prause ya yi ƙarya game da shigar da rahoton FBI akan Gary Wilson).

----------

A cikin wannan sakon Twitter na gaba, muna da ikirarin cewa SASH tana goyon bayan kalaman eugenics. Dangane da karar batanci da Don Hilton ya shigar , Prause ya hada wasu kalaman da ba su dace ba daga Don Hilton, ya kuma wallafa su a YouTube, yana ikirarin cewa yana goyon bayan kalaman eugenics.

--------

Wani tweet cike da karya, yana zargin SASH na ƙarya da son “lalata rashin yarda da kowane irin tsada”:

Hotunan allo suna na 3 daga cikin haruffa 4 da tayi tweeted sau da yawa. Abokan da ke kusa da batsa sun rubuta wasiƙun da aka cika da ƙarya bisa umarnin Yin amfani. Ta yi ƙoƙari ta shigar da 4 daga cikin waɗannan haruffa a cikin takaddama na hana cin amanarta, amma alƙali ya ga dama ta hanyar su a matsayin ƙage (marubutan wasiƙan sun sake faɗar abin da Prause ya gaya musu - waɗanda ƙarya ce, ba tare da wata babbar shaidar tallafi ba)

Haruffan da aka zana a cikin tweet na RYBOP na sama, wanda Prause yayi tweeting sau da yawa, basu faɗi abin da take ikirarin sun faɗa ba. Babu wani daga cikin marubutan da ya ce na yi wa mawallafansu bita. Haruffa da ba a taɓa amfani da su ba sun ƙunshi ainihin shaidar da za ta goyi bayan da'awar Prause.

Sauran - Aiki: Yin amfani da @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin Gabe Deem da "tsokanar ta'addanci a cikin gida," "tsokanar tashin hankali ga mata," "shiga cikin misogyny & zamba," "tallafawa barazanar mutuwa & wariyar launin fata," "ƙarfafa kisan kai mata masu ilimin kimiyya, "" suna barazanar kashe mata, "" ya kasance mai adawa da LGBT, "kuma" yana goyan bayan eugenics. "

Bayani: Wannan yana ɗaya daga cikin sassa da yawa da ke nuna yadda Prause ke ci gaba da yaƙin neman zaɓe inda ta zargi waɗanda ta zaɓa da aika barazanar kisa, ko tallafawa barazanar kisa, ko kuma sa wasu su aika barazanar kisa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaida da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba.

YBOP yayi tir da barazanar, munanan kalamai a shafukan sada zumunta, haka ma duk wanda muka sani. Wannan ya ce, intanet ita ce Wild West. Yawancin mutanen da ke cikin jama'a - na kowane jinsi da jinsi - sun gaya mana cewa a kai a kai suna samun tsoffin maganganu daga masu lalata yanar gizo. Handfulananan maganganun da ba a san su ba Yi amfani da da'awar sun ƙaddamar da kodadde a kwatanta.

Da alama tana bincika intanet don neman shaidar cewa ana cin zarafinta, har ma tana amfani da wani manhajar Reddit na musamman don tattara maganganun da ba a san ko su waye ba, waɗanda masu kula da dandalin tattaunawa suka riga suka share su cikin sauri da kuma akai-akai. Sannan ta zargi mutanen da take son ɓata suna da rubutawa ko ƙarfafa maganganun - ba tare da wata shaida ba. Yana nuna cewa ta tattara misalai kaɗan na zargin da ake yi mata na cin zarafin. Da alama mutane ba sa damuwa da ayyukan Prause don su dame ta.

Sashe na farko sun kuma ba da labarin irin wannan ikirarin na ƙarya cewa Gabe Deem ya aika ko tallafawa mutuwa da barazanar fyade da ke mata.

A kan Rashin ladabi, cike da tweets. Lura - Tweets na Tweets sau da yawa suna cewa Gabe wani ɓangare ne na ƙungiyar ƙirar. Babu Rukuni. Wataƙila tana yin wannan ƙarancin hannu tana tunanin zai kare ta daga shari'ar ɓatanci. Ba haka bane.

Shin kuna goyon bayan ƙiyayya da kuma kalaman ɓatanci, kawai don yin rubutu a shafin Twitter na Donald Hilton? Prause ta saka bidiyon ƙarya a tashar YouTube ta TruthShallSetSetYouFree tana mai cewa Hilton ya faɗi abubuwan da bai faɗi ba. Don haka, tana amfani da bidiyonta mai cike da ƙarya a matsayin "shaida" cewa duk wanda ya taɓa yin rubutu a shafin Twitter na Hilton yana adawa da LGBTQ kuma yana tallata kalaman ɓatanci. Shi ke nan.

-------

@BrainOnPorn yayi ikirarin cewa saboda Gabe yana bin Fitowa Cry akan Twitter, yana goyon bayan duk abin da EC tayi ko tsaye. Ba tare da la'akari ba, Fitowa kuka bai faɗi abin da @BrainOnPorn ya tabbatar ba.

Wata kuma, a rana ɗaya. Yanzu Gabe tana ƙarfafa kisan kai! Wannan ɓata suna ne domin tana zargin Gabe da aikata laifuka.

Kwana daya. "Barazanar kashe mata." Mahaukaci. (Bugu da ƙari, babu "rukuni.")

Kwana daya. Hakanan maganganun 4 guda ɗaya ta ɓoye mara izini. (Lura - ta ce Gabe ya san komai game da maganganun 4, amma @BrainOnPorn ya toshe shi. Don haka, koda kuwa yana so ya “kushe” maganganun bazuwar, ba a hukumance ya san akwai su ba.)

A wannan rana. Kuna goyon bayan ƙiyayya da kuma kalaman ɓatanci, kawai don yin wani bidiyo na Donald Hilton, MD a shafin Twitter? Prause ta saka wani bidiyo mai cike da ƙarya a tashar YouTube ta TruthShallSetSetYouFree , tana mai iƙirarin cewa Hilton ya faɗi abubuwan da bai faɗi ba. Don haka, tana amfani da bidiyonta mai cike da ƙarya a matsayin "shaida" cewa duk wanda ya taɓa yin rubutu a shafin Hilton yana adawa da LGBTQ kuma yana tallata kalaman ɓatanci. Shi ke nan.

Kwana daya. Kazafi iri daya.

--------

Tags Gabe, mai ba da shawara shi da wasu na iya aika barazanar kisa. Fadakarwa: Tana ikirarin cewa tana karbar “barazanar mutuwa” tun daga shekarar 2010. Koyaya, dinbin maganganun da ba a san su ba wadanda za a iya fassara su a zaman barazanar sun fara ne kawai a shekarar 2019.

Kwana daya. Gwadawa tana tweeting cewa ni sanannen mai laifi ne. Da gaske? Wannan labari ne a gare ni, da kuma cin mutunci mara kyau ta hanyar amfani da Prause.

Da yake magana game da doka: Nasarorin shari'a akan mai cin zarafi/ɓata suna Nicole Prause: Ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka zalunta ba!

Kwana daya. Duk karairayi, kamar yadda take ikirarin karya ni ina zagin mata a duk duniya. Tana sanya haruffa guda 3 nata, wadanda basa faɗin abin da tweets ɗin ke ikirari.

Dangane da bin diddigi, nasarar shari'a ta farko da na samu ta nuna Nicole Prause a matsayin mai laifin, ba wanda aka zalunta ba . A ranar 6 ga Agusta, 2020, Kotun Koli ta Gundumar Los Angeles ta yanke hukunci cewa yunƙurin ƙarya na Prause na neman umarnin hana ni ya zama "ƙarar dabarar yaƙi da shiga jama'a" mara amfani kuma ba bisa ƙa'ida ba (wanda aka fi sani da "ƙarar SLAPP") . Prause ta yi ƙarya a cikin littafinta na TRO na yaudara, ba tare da bayar da wata shaida da za a iya tabbatarwa ba don tallafawa iƙirarin ta na ban mamaki cewa na bi ta ko na musguna mata. A taƙaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta yi amfani da tsarin hana ni don cin zarafi da kuma rage haƙƙoƙina na 'yancin faɗar albarkacin baki. Ta hanyar doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wa Prause ya biya kuɗin lauya na.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke watsawa.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ƙasa Prause ta shiga cikin wani zaren tattaunawa na shekaru 3. Ta haɗu da sabon shafin yanar gizo wanda ya maye gurbin RealYBOP, wanda yanzu ni nake da shi . Tana kwaikwayon bayanan da asusun RealYBOP ɗinta ya wallafa a shafin Twitter.

----------

Shigar da zaren shekara 3, yana ba da shawarar Gabe ya tsokano ta'addanci, tashin hankali ga mata, misogyny da zamba. Tana haɗin yanar gizo zuwa sabon shafin maye gurbin RealYBOP (wanda na mallaka yanzu). Ka lura da yadda sabon rukunin yanar gizon yake birge masu sha'awar YBOP, FTND, Nofap, da Fitowa Kuyi a cikin taken shafin yanar gizon sa. Waɗannan su ne ainihin maƙasudin masana'antar batsa. Hmmm….

Kamar yadda kowa zai iya gani, Ganin shine mai aiki na @BrainOnPorn Twitter.

--------

Shigar da zaren Gabe, kodayake an toshe ta, tana aika rubuce rubuce game da ta'addancin da take yi a dandalin dawo da batsa. Ka tuna cewa Babban batsa yana da matukar damuwa ta hanyar tattaunawar dawo da batsa, yayin da suke ba da izinin waɗanda batsa ta intanet ta shafa da kyau don raba labaransu tare da takwarorinsu. Idan aka ba da kyakkyawar alaƙar da ke tare da masana'antar batsa, ba abin mamaki ba ne cewa ta yi amfani da kowane zarafi don yi wa mutane bayani game da waɗannan tarurruka.

A hakikanin gaskiya, tarurruka na dawo da batsa wasu daga cikin abokai ne, mafi yawan tallafi da haɗin yanar gizo. Baƙi sukan yi sharhi a kan wannan. Amma duk da haka masana'antar batsa da shills dinta zai sa kowa ya yi imanin cewa fagen dawo da ita dandali ne na mugayen ƙungiyoyin ƙiyayya. Yaƙin neman zaɓe mai ƙyama, eh?

Kwana daya. Tweeting duk inda aka ambaci Gabe, ta sanya labarin batsa na batsa:

Shigar da zaren Gabe, duk da cewa an toshe ta, tana aika rubuce rubucenta na karya kan tattaunawar dawo da batsa wanda ke nuna Gabe tana koyar da mummunan tashin hankali.

Haɗin gwiwa tare da takwararta ta yanar gizo mai suna @SexualSocialist:

------

Posting ta Matsakaici labarin, kai hari siffofin dawo da batsa kamar Sake yi

--------

Wani nutty tweet. Screenhtst ba shi da komai tare da abin da ake kira Prause. Bugu da ƙari, don tallafawa batsahub:

Kamar yadda kake gani, hotunan kariyar ba su faɗi abin da take da'awa ba (ba su taɓa yin Nikky ba):

---------

Kashegari, sanya Posting Gabe, wanda ya toshe ta

Sauran - Gudana: Gudanar da amfani da @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya da yaƙi da Sabon Magungunan (FTND) na kasancewa mai adawa da LGBT, "inganta misogyny," "aikata zamba," da "koyarwa eugenics. "

Kafin kamfen ɗin TraffickingHub na Laila Mickelwait , ni da Fight The New Drug mun kasance abin da Prause ya fi so. Waɗannan sassan sun ƙunshi misalai da yawa na Prause yana ɓata sunan FTND:

Sashin yanzu yana sadaukar da sakonnin tweets ne waɗanda basu dace da sassan da ke sama ba.

Muna farawa da asusun guda biyu waɗanda yanzu aka dakatar don cin zarafin niyya. Babu wani abu a cikin mai zuwa @ BrainOnPorn's tweet yana da goyan bayan shaidu (@BrainOnPorn yana nuna FTND yana adawa da 'yan luwadi).

---------

Adireshin hanyar sadarwa ta SLT da aka tsara game da FTND, suna nuna cewa FTND ya sabawa LGBT:

Littafin Prause mai kalmomi 600 mai suna Op-Ed ya cika da maganganun da ba a goyon baya ba da aka yi niyya don yaudarar jama'a. Ya kasa tallafawa magana ɗaya tilo domin ya ambaci takardu 4 kawai - babu ɗayansu da ke da alaƙa da jarabar batsa, tasirin batsa akan dangantaka, ko matsalolin jima'i da batsa ke haifarwa. Ƙwararru da yawa a wannan fanni sun karyata ikirarinsa da maganganun banza a cikin wannan ɗan gajeren martani - Op-ed: Wanene ainihin ke ɓatar da kimiyya kan batsa? (2016) . Ba kamar "masana kimiyyar jijiyoyi na Op-Ed," wanda a bayyane yake Prause ya rubuta ba, sun ambaci ɗaruruwan bincike da sake dubawa da yawa na adabi.

--------

RealYBOP yace FTND tana inganta misogyny. Menene alamomin tweets da aka ambata akan reddit suna da alaƙa da FTND? Babu komai.

------

Karyata zargin FTND da aikata zamba, lokacin da ta bayyana binciken daidai:

Prause yana ƙoƙarin yin wasannin da Paul Wright ya bayyana: Paul Wright PhD Ya Kira Dabaru Masu Tambaya na Masu Binciken Batsa (2021) ta hanyar yin watsi da bincike da dama na dogon lokaci da ke nuna cewa amfani da batsa yana haifar da lahani.

---------

Ta kira FTND da kin jinin 'yan luwadi yayin da take wallafa wani rubutu da aka yi watsi da shi a shafinta na Twitter ( Op-ed: Wanene ainihin yake ɓatar da kimiyya kan batsa?, 2016 ):

Ka lura da yadda Fuskantarwa ke ɓata sunan FTND a cikin zaren inda ake sukar batsa mai zafi. Shin wannan ya fi dacewa da goyon baya ga tsaron Pornhub?

-------

A cikin wannan tweet na gaba muna da mahaukaci, mummunan iƙirarin cewa FTND yana koyar da ilimin eugenics:

A martanin da ya mayar kan ƙarar ɓatanci da Don Hilton ya shigar , Prause ya haɗa wasu kalaman da ba su dace ba daga Don Hilton, ya saka su a YouTube, kuma ya yi iƙirarin cewa yana goyon bayan kalaman eugenics. Wannan mummunan dabara ce.