Nicole Prause ta Rashin ethabi'a da ethatancin Gary Wilson da Sauran (Shafi 4)

Gabatarwa (kamar yadda yake bayyana a Page #1)

Mashawarcin doka ya ba mu shawara don ƙirƙirar waɗannan shafuka, waɗanda ke da rubuce-rubuce game da yaƙin neman zaɓe na Nicole Prause wanda ke nufin waɗanda ke nuna yiwuwar cutar da batsa ko batutuwa a cikin masana'antar batsa. "Sunshine" yana kare al'umma Yi amfani da fitintinu ta hanyar adana hujjoji tare da bawa baƙi da 'yan jarida damar fahimtar gaskiya da kansu. Lallai, waɗannan shafukan an riga an ambata a cikin a karar cin mutunci akan Amincewa:

“Tarihin wanda ake kara ya kasance cikakke kuma ingantacce wanda yake dauke da asusun mutane da dama wadanda abin ya shafa tun daga shekarar 2013 zuwa yanzu, wanda ya kunshi sama da shafuka dubu biyu na takardu da shaidu, ana samu https://bit.ly/32KOa3q. "

Nicole Farko ta tsunduma cikin gaskiya daga da'awar karya, batanci, rahoto mai cutarwa, tursasawa da aka yi niyya, kararraki marassa tushe, da barazanar kararraki. Waɗannan shafuka suna tattara da yawa daga dabarun lalata ta, kodayake ba a haɗa wasu abubuwan da suka faru ba saboda maƙasudin suna jin tsoron ƙarin fansa daga gare ta (Page 1, Page 2, Page 3, Page 4, Shafi na 5, Page 6).

Ni (Gary Wilson) wataƙila ni ne burinta da ta fi so, amma kuma ta yi niyya ga masu bincike, likitocin likita, masu ba da magani, masana halayyar ɗan adam, abokan aikinta daga gajeriyar aikinta a UCLA, ƙungiyar ba da agaji ta Burtaniya, maza suna murmurewa, a TIME editan mujallar, furofesoshi da yawa, IITAP, SASH, Fight The New Drug, TraffickingHub, Exodus Cry, the academic journal Kimiyya mai kwakwalwa, iyayensa MDPI, US likitoci na likitoci, shugaban jaridar kimiyya CUREUS, da mujallar Yin jima'i da jima'i da jima'i. Wadannan lamuran ana musu alama "SAURAN." Abubuwan da ke faruwa da aka tsara an tsara su daidai cikin tsari na lokaci-lokaci.

Game da ni, tun da farko ta yi da'awar ƙarya cewa ni ne batun umarnin “babu lamba”. Ta fara zargina da zargina da farauta a 2013 lokacin da ita da David Ley fara niyya ta website da su PT blog post, “Brainka a kan Kwallon - Ba BAYA ba. ” Lokacin da na kalubalanci wasu daga da'awar karya, Yi kokarin gwada ni don tsoratar da ni don cire amsata ta suna zargina da yin kara.

Tun daga wannan lokacin, ta saba da amfani da wannan zargi a kan mutane da yawa, wadanda aka kawata su da zarge-zargen karya na “barazanar mutuwa,” a fili don dakile nuna son zuciya da mummunan aiki. A takaice dai, labarinta na cin zarafin mutane ya ta'azzara tsawon shekaru kamar yadda ya zamar mata tsangwama.

A ƙarshen 2020, kwatsam sai ta fara da'awar cewa an yi lalata da ita a cikin 2019, kuma ni da alhakin abin ban mamaki. Ta da'awar karya cewa na sanya adireshin ta akan YBOP kuma hakan ya haifar da kama ta akan wani saurayi mai skateboard. Ba ta ba da wata hujja bayyananniya ba game da ko na sanya adireshinta na zahiri ko kuma an kama ta.

Abin mamakin shi ne cewa Prause bai damu da bayyana ainihinta ba home adireshi gare ni lokacin da ta gabatar da fatarar kuɗi don kaucewa biyan ni wasu ~ $ 40K a cikin kuɗin lauya bayan hukuncin SLAPP kotu ta ba ni (duba “lamuran shari’a” a ƙasa). Ta kasance da tabbacin cewa ba zan taɓa bayyana shi ba (kuma ba ni da sha'awar yin hakan) - wanda ke nuna yadda maganganun da nake yi na son sanya ta cikin haɗari suke yi. Ba zato ba tsammani, a cikin fatararta tayi ta rantse cewa tana da ya rayu a wannan adireshin fiye da shekaru 3. Amma duk da haka ta sha yin ikirari (karya) a lokaci guda tana yi motsa sau da yawa don guje wa masu sakarta (babu). Wani abu don ciyar da labari na zaluncin da ta qirqiro!

Don kawai in bayyana, Ban taɓa ƙarfafa kowa don musgunawa Yin amfani ba. Haka kuma ban ga wata shaidar da ke nuna cewa duk wanda na sani ya wulakanta ta ko sanya ta cikin hadari ba. Tana da al'ada ta kawo "shaidar" kirkirarru wannan ba, a zahiri, ya tabbatar da da'awar ta ba. Misali, tana yi mata magani rahotannin karya ga jami’an tsaro, kowane Haruffa C&D zargin mutane game da abubuwan da basu aikata ba, shafukanta marasa mahimmanci, da ita hada kai'maganganun da ba a san su ba a matsayin hujja, kodayake babu wanda ya ba da hujja don tabbatar da iƙirarinta.

Ya kamata a lura da cewa 'yar jaridar nan ta Kanada mai binciken Diana Davison wacce ta yi rubutun Millennika na Post bijirar da 'akan Yin wasa, yayi magana da ita a rikodin kusan mako guda. A cikin maganganun jama'a a ƙarƙashin bidiyo mai alaƙa Davison yayi sharhi, "Prause ya faɗi abubuwa da yawa a gare ni amma babu ɗaya daga cikin “shaidar” da ta goyi bayan da'awar ta. A cikin kowane misali shaidun sun juye wanda wanene mai zalunci. Tana zargin wasu da ainihin abubuwan da ita kanta ta aikata. Na yi imel tare da ita, a rikodin, kusan mako guda. ” A cikin sharhi na biyu Davison ya ce, "Lokacin da na ce na yi makonni biyu ina bincike kan wannan yana nufin na karanta kowane takaddar kotu da kowane takaddun da ke da alaƙa kuma na yi mako guda tare da yin imel tare da Prause kanta wacce ta yanke ni bayan na fara neman ainihin shaidar tsangwama.”Prause ya amsa ta yana barazanar kai karar Davison da Millennika na Post, duk da cewa bata bi ta ba.

Batutuwan doka

Kodayake Prause da ƙawayenta suna aiki tuƙuru don zana ta a matsayin wanda aka azabtar, ita ce, a gaskiya, mai zalunci, duka a shafukan sada zumunta da cikin lamuran shari'a. A kotu, wannan bai yi mata kyau ba. Wannan shafin yana rubuce daban-daban cin nasarar doka akan Amincewa, biyu daga cikinsu sun shafe ni. Zan takaita su.

A farkon 2020, Prause ta yi ƙoƙari don ƙarfafa kamfen ɗin da ta gina kanta ta hanyar shigar da buƙata na ƙuntatawa mara tushe a kaina. A cikin bayanan da aka cika ta da ƙarya, Prause ta tafi har zuwa bata suna da dox ɗana. Kotu ta ki amincewa da bukatarta a watan Agusta, 2020. Alkalin kuma ba da SLAPP na (“Ka’idar Shari’a Kan Kasancewar Jama’a”) motsi. Wannan yana nufin ya yanke shawara cewa gabatar da shari'ar mara izgili da ƙazamar ƙazantawa haramtacciyar ƙoƙari ce ta danne haƙƙin 'yancin magana na.

A takaice, ba a iya tabbatar da ikirarinta na cin zarafin ba. A zahiri, yayin saurarar yawancin shaidarta an jefar da ita azaman "ji ne," "kammalawa," "ba shi da muhimmanci" da sauransu. Mako guda kafin sauraron, Prause ya ci gaba da Twitter zuwa sanar da karya cewa tana da “umarnin kariya” a kaina, tana tunzura mabiyanta da suka fusata don tursasa ni. Jim kadan kafin a saurari karar, lauyan nata yayi kokarin yin murabus saboda ta tsoratar da shi da hukuncin shari'a alhali ba zai shiga halin rashin da'a ba. Sanarwar manema labarai

Na gaba, ta shigar da karar bata min suna a Oregon. A cikin Janairu, 2021, kotu ta sami Prause ba ta gabatar da kararta ba, kuma ta ba ni tsada da hukunci (wanda Prause ya ƙi biya). Sanarwar manema labarai.

Ba zato ba tsammani, Yin wasa bai biya ɗayan hukuncin da na ci ba. Madadin haka, ta zaɓi wani yaƙin neman zaɓe na ɓatanci da yi min barazana - kamar dai ni mai laifi ne maimakon kanta. Ita ma ta fito fili ƙaryata cewa ta rasa ɗayan ɗayan shari'o'in da ke sama. Abin mamaki.

A gefe guda, a farkon 2019 Prause sun gabatar da sanarwar ƙarya ga hukumomin Alamar Amurka lokacin da ta shafi don karɓar alamun kasuwanci na gama gari, tana mai cewa ba ta san da wani wanda ke da 'yancin amfani da shi ba my URL da alamun kasuwanci. Ta wannan makircin, ta nemi samun haƙƙoƙin haƙƙin doka na ingantaccen URL ɗin da na kafa. Wannan ƙoƙari ne na gaskiya don tantance duk shafin yanar gizon. details. A bayyane yake, ba daidai ba ne a nuna Fuskantar azaman wanda aka azabtar, an ba shi mummunan kamfen kamar wannan.

Bayan awowi da yawa na lokacin lauya, Na karɓi rajista ta kasuwanci ta asali kamar haka haɗin keta URL, RealYourBrainOnPorn.com. Kamfanin sada zumunta na Twitter @BrainOnPorn a halin yanzu ya gudanar da mulkin ta'addanci tsawon watanni 18. @BrainOnPorn yayi amfani da shi da ake tsammani “gama gari” to tweet fiye da kalaman batanci da sharri (har zuwa tweets 170 a rana!) game da duk wanda Prause ba ta yarda da shi ba. Gwadawa ya ƙaryata game da sa hannu, amma sauƙaƙan kallo, wasiƙa daga ma'aikatan RealYBOP, rahoton WIPO, da kuma manyan shaidu sun nuna yadda take gudanar da asusun RealYBOP na kafofin watsa labarun da URL (shaida nan).

Partiesungiyoyi daban-daban guda uku sun gabatar da karar ɓata suna game da Fuskantarwa game da rashin gaskiyarta, yaƙin neman zaɓe na rayuwa: Donald L. Hilton, Jr. v. Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gunduma ta Amurka na Yankin Yammacin Texas San Antonio Division, Shari'a Mai lamba 5: 19-CV-00755-OLG; Alexander Rhodes da Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gunduma ta Amurka don Yammacin Gundumar Pennsylvania, Shari'a Mai lamba 2: 19-cv-01366, da Aaron M. Minc, Esq v. Melissa A. Farmer da Nicole R. Prause, Lamarin Babu: CV-20-937026 a Cuyahoga County, Ohio. (Ya bayyana cewa Manomi ya amince da sasantawa, wanda zai bar Fuskantar a matsayin wanda ake kara. Babu shakka sasantawar ta shafi biyan kudi daga kamfanin inshorar Farmer. A cikin takardar da aka gabatar a ranar 8 ga Afrilu, 2021, Farmer ta amince da aikata ba daidai ba a sake sake rubuta labaran karya na Prause [PDF na janyewa] Prause ta bayyana cewa kamfanin inshorar nata ya ƙi rufe ta don ƙarar Minc a kanta, don haka ana iya barin ta kai tsaye da alhakin duk wani tasirin da ya shafi kuɗi a cikin wannan shari'ar kuma. Har yanzu tana bin Wilson game da nasarar da ya yi a kanta.)

Shari'o'in 2 na farko sun daidaita a farkon 2021. Kodayake ba a bayyana sharuɗɗan ba, yana da kyau a yi tunanin cewa ƙididdigar ta yiwu ne ta hanyar biyan kuɗi mai yawa daga kamfanin inshorar ingila na Prause (kotu takardu bayyana cewa an tura kudade ga masu gabatar da kara). Na uku kuma karar batanci da ta gabata kara yana gudana a Ohio. A wannan yanayin, wani abokin aikin Prause wanda ya sake buga bayanan tweets na batanci ya kasance mai gabatar da kara kuma ya kasance cikin bakin ciki ga abin dogaro don shiga makaho cikin makafi.

Ya kamata a lura da cewa Fuskantar da kanta tana da girma a matsayin mai shigar da kara. A cikin shekarar da ta gabata ko makamancin haka, ta yi ƙara fiye da haka rabin dozin ƙananan ƙararraki sun dace, kuma, kafin wannan, wasu 40 mummunan rahoto a kan mutane da yawa da kungiyoyi (duk da haka, Ba a taɓa yin nasara a cikin kowace kara ba kuma an kori duk rahotonninta na yaudara). Yin aiki yana da dogon tarihi, ingantaccen tarihin ƙoƙari don yin shiru da wulakanta duk wanda ta ƙi yarda dashi ta hanyar ƙirƙira iƙirarin abin da aka cuta.

Yawancin dakatarwar kafofin watsa labarun

A watan Oktoba, 2015 Yi amfani da asusun Twitter na asali @NicolePrause an dakatar dashi dindindin don rashin da'a.

A watan Maris, 2018, Prause's An dakatar da asusun Quora don aikawa da kuskuren bayyanawa, bayanan sirri.

A watan Oktoba, 2020 asusun @BrainOnPorn Twitter, wanda Prause ya bayyana ya gudanar, an dakatar dashi dindindin don zalunci da cin zarafi.

A watan Maris, 2021, asusun ta na Twitter na biyu, @NicoleRPrause an dakatar da shi na dan wani lokaci saboda yin "barazanar mai karfi."

Ina tsammanin Prause ta kasance a bayan wasu bayanan Twitter da suka lalace: @ Gyara Wils1 kuma ita ce masana'antar batsa ta farko da ke lissafi @Rariyajarida.

Hanyoyin watsa labarai da sauransu sun lalace ta hanyar ƙaryar Prause

Kamfanin watsa labarai na Burtaniya Labaran Scram ya fita daga kasuwanci bayan da ta biya diyya mai yawa saboda tana da buga labaran karya na Prause. Na ji hakan Mataimakon an yi irin wannan ikirarin na batanci kuma dole ne ya cire bayanan karya bayar da shi ta hanyar Yin amfani, biyan farashi mai tsoka na shari'a. Na san farko-hannu cewa ZUMA mujallar ta gabatar da jerin labarai game da wanda ake zargi da cutar. Duk da haka, bayan ƙarin bincike, ZUMA ya ƙi buga labaran ƙarya - kuma ba da daɗewa ba mujallar ta dakatar da buga shi gaba ɗaya. Idan aka fuskanci shari'a, The Daily Beast ya sake yin watsi da zargin da ba a tabbatar da shi ba game da takamaiman mutane. Aƙarshe, Jami'ar ɗaliban Jami'ar Wisconsin-Lacrosse an tilasta cire labarin "bincike" wanda ke nuna karairayin Dr. Prause game da ni (U na W babban lauya ya shiga).

Yi amfani da dangantaka mai dadi tare da masana'antar batsa

Bari mu fara da ma'anar “shill”:

Shill… mutum ne wanda yake ba da taimako ga jama'a ko ba da gaskiya ga mutum ko ƙungiya ba tare da bayyana cewa suna da kusanci da mutumin ko ƙungiyar ba. May Masu sayarwa da kamfen talla na ƙwararru zasu iya amfani da shills.

Kasancewa da ma'anar da ke sama, la'akari da waɗannan da yawa misalai. Gwadawa shine rashin nuna son batsa, nuna a tunani guda wannan abin birgewa ne a wajen masanin kimiyya, ganin cewa masana kimiyya yawanci suna kishin rashin nuna wariyar su.

Lissafin Twitter uku - nata NicoleRPrause asusu kazalika wadanda aka dakatar BrainOnPorn da kuma @Rariyajarida (na biyun na 2 wanda Prause ya bayyana don sarrafawa) - akai-akai, ko propped, sama da batsa masana'antu da kuma kai hari ga masu sukar.

Har ila yau, ya nuna ya ƙirƙira 50 + Wikipedia sockupppets (har zuwa yanzu) don haɓaka sha'awar masana'antar da ɓata sunan masu sukar tare da gyare-gyaren ɓata, tare da wasu sunayen laƙabi da yawa tana amfani da post a dandalin dawo da batsa.

'Yan shekarun da suka gabata ne kawai, Prause ke inganta alaƙarta da masana'antar batsa, gami da yin bautar a kan hukumar 'yan wasan kwaikwayo' batsa (APAG) da hotunan ta halarta a cikin masana'antar batsa-abubuwan da ke faruwa. Yanzu, tana ƙoƙari ta tsoratar da wasu ba tare da ambaton ɗayan waɗannan ba hujjojin da basu dace ba saboda ta yanke shawarar cutar da mutuncinta.

A takaice, ba a bayyana dalilin da yasa kowane dan jarida (wanene ba ba shilling don masana'antar batsa) zai ɗauki Prauseaukar azaman tushe ne abin dogaro. 'Yan jarida suna da alhaki ga masu karatu su mutunta yanke hukuncin alkalai da sauran sakamakon shari'a, kuma kada su bar masu karatu da kuskuren fahimtar cewa gaskiya game da tuhumar da ake yi wa Prause ta kasance ta kamewa ko kuma ikirarin batancin nata na da inganci. Samun rasa a kotuna, sau da yawa takan yi ƙoƙari ta sake rubuta tarihi a cikin jarida da kuma Wikipedia tare da taimakon editoci masu son zuciya.

Zai yi wuya wadanda ta dauka su tantance gaskiya daga labaran almara domin maganganunta suna da "dadi" kuma kirkirar “shaidarta” tana da yawa. Koyaya, kamar yadda sakamako na a kotu ya nuna, Na tattara takardu da yawa kuma zan iya karyata iƙirarinta, idan an tambaye ni.

Ba duk wanda yake iƙirarin cewa an zalunce shi ba. Wasu suna kawai kokarin ƙoƙarin yin amfani da mutuncinsu na jama'a ko don ɓata suna kuma "ba dandamali" (yin shiru) ga duk wanda ba su yarda da shi ba. Yi tunanin Trump. 'Yan jaridu za su so yin tunani sosai kafin su ba wa Farfajiyar dandamali da za ta haɓaka ƙaryar ta da ɓatanci.

Cikakken Tabarau na Nasihu (duka shafuka 5)

Yi amfani da Shafi # 1

Yi amfani da Shafi # 2

Yi amfani da Shafi # 3

Yi amfani da Shafi # 4

Yi amfani da Shafi # 5

Yi amfani da Shafi # 6

Wasu - Yuli, 2020: RealYourBrainOnPorn (Prause) suna zargin Gabe Deem da yin aiki tare da ƙungiyoyin da ke barazanar kashewa da yi mana fyade “mu”. Wannan bata suna ne da se. (ɓangaren yana ƙunshe da ƙarin lokuta na lalata-cyberstalking ta Yin amfani)

RealYBOP (@BrainOnPorn) ta ci gaba da maganganun batsa na Gabe Deem, tana mai cewa yana aiki tare da kungiyoyin da ke aikata laifi. M lalata tweet:

Shin hakan zai haifar da wata ƙararrakin ƙara?

Cyarin cyberstalking na Deem. Kuma, kwance game da binciken 2007, kamar yadda aka fallasa anan: La'akari da iƙirarin da ke tattare da "Rashin Amsa da Jima'i da Tasirin Moabi'a mara kyau a Jima'i a cikin Mazaje Masu Bayanan Yin Jima'i da Maza" (2020)

Cigaba da ci gaba da karyatawa:

RealYBOP bai gurbata komai ba. A zahiri, muhawara ta ƙare akan PIED kamar yadda binciken 7 ya ba da rahoton maza da ke murmurewa daga PIED ta hanyar dakatar da batsa: Jerin wannan ya ƙunshi nazarin nazarin 40 da ke haɗa jita-jita ta batsa / jaraba na batsa ga matsalolin jima'i da ƙananan ƙananan hawaye zuwa jima'i na jima'i.. The Binciken na farko na 7 a jerin sun nuna lalacewa, yayin da mahalarta suka kawar da yin amfani da batsa da kuma warkar da dysfunctions na yau da kullum.

Ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo: Hanyar haɗi a tweet ba KYAU bane game da canje-canje na kwakwalwa, waɗanda kawai aikin kwakwalwa ne na yau da kullun. Bayani ba daidai ba:

Daga baya a wannan ranar ta tatsar bayanan sirrinta da rashin gaskiya game da karatun shekara 10, wanda bai tambaya game da amfani da batsa:

--------

Defarin ɓarna da haɓakar Gabe Deem:

FYI - Gabe ya tafi kwaleji, don haka yana iya kai ƙara RealYBOP don ɓata suna.

A rana guda, yin Tweeting a cikin zaren Gabe (RealYBOP ya toshe Gabe). RealYBOP bata tanka mata komai ba face labarin matsakaici wanda yake niyyata:

Kar ka fadawa RealYBOP, wanda ake zarginsa da laifin bata masa suna da wasu mutane biyu da ka zarge shi da yi da cin zarafin mata. Wannan shine ku:

Har ila yau duba - Nicole Prause qarya na wadanda aka yi wa lakabi-hood wanda ba a bayyana shi a matsayin mara tushe: ita ce mai cin zarafin, ba wacce aka azabtar.

------------

Ga 7^th rana a jere, RealYBOP zazzage hotunan hoto na Gabe Deem, zubar da mutuncinsa. A wannan karon ta bi bayan Don Hilton, tsai ya nemi likita da cin mutuncin ta. Hakan zai yi kyau ga alkali

—————————————————————

updates:

Sauran - Yuli, 2020: RealYBOP (Faɗakarwa) ya zargi Staci Sprout da faɗin cewa masu binciken RealYourBrainOnPorn sun wulaƙanta yara

TAFIYA # 1: RealYBOP tana kwance lokacin da ta ce Sprout ya ce masu bincike sun cutar da yara. A zahiri, Staci yana tattaunawa Table 34 na rahoton 1948sey na Kinsey, wanda ya ƙunshi bayanan da aka tattara daga masu lalata da yara waɗanda ke lalata da yara.

KARANTA: Sprout yana kawai yana magana ne game da gaskiyar cewa Alfred Kinsey ya haɗu da pedophiles don ƙirƙirar alamar ƙasa 1948 da 1952 game da rayuwar ɗan adam. Musamman, waɗannan bayanan an rubuta su a cikin Table 34 na wannan littafin da Cibiyar Kinsey ta buga. A cikin Tebur 34 yara masu amfani da ƙwayoyin cuta sunyi amfani da agogo na lokaci zuwa lokacin abin da suke kira ƙazantattun yara a cikin yara tun suna aan watanni kaɗan zuwa farkon matasa.

Wannan ba jayayya, kamar yadda Table 34 daga shahararren rubutun Kinsey Harkokin Jima'i a cikin Ɗan Mutum (1948) takardu a bayyane. Duba wannan labarin Washington Post daga 1995: BAYANIN KINSEY, FASAHA DA KYAUTA? kuma wannan video.

Tebur 34 - Labarin a ƙarƙashin teburin ya ce, 'an yi amfani da lokaci na biyu da hannun ko kuma agogon gudu'

Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa Fuskantarwa kuma yayi kuskuren tattauna batun Don Hilton game da Table 34, ƙirƙirar labarin da Hilton ya kira ta ƙwayar ƙwayar ƙwayar yara, kawai saboda ya tambaye ta game da Jigilar 34. Don Hilton ya ba da amsa a cikin 2016 don ƙaryar Prause a nan: Prause ya zargi Donald Hilton, MD. Daga nan sai ta yi amfani da zanen nata don ta bayar da hujjar yin karar bayanai tare da jami'arta da Hukumar Kula da Lafiya ta Texas, lamarin da ya haifar da hakan Addu'ar da aka shigar da Hilton don ɓata suna. Yanzu muna da Prause (RealYBOP) muna ƙoƙarin jan tarko guda tare da Staci Sprout.

An cire daga wannan labarin jawabi ga Tebur 34:

In Harkokin Jima'i a cikin Ɗan Mutum (wanda aka sake buga shi a cikin 1998 kuma yana da yawa), Cibiyar ta buga sanannen Jadawalin 34, wanda ke tattara bayanan "martani na jima'i" na yara daga jarirai ta hanyar matasa kamar yadda manya suka yi. Wadannan yara masu yin fyade sunyi gwajin jima'i a kan daruruwan yara ta hanyar kawo su ga abin da masu gwajin suka kira "farji" (kururuwa, kuka, yakar "abokin tarayya") da kuma sanya wadannan martani tare da agogo.
John Bancroft, MD, tsohon darektan Cibiyar Kinsey, a cikin takarda, "Alfred Kinsey da Siyasa na Bincike na Ilimin Jima'i" ya ce Alfred Kinsey ya kasance, "yana da matukar sha'awar lura da manya da suka yi jima'i da kananan yara." Kin da hankalin Kinsey ne tare da rikicewar jima'i na yara wanda ya haifar da buga littafin mara kyau na 34 a cikin Fasali na 5 na Halayyar Aikin Jima'i a cikin Humanan Adam, wanda ke tattara bayanan lalata da yara ɗari.
Kinsey ya yi alfahari da cewa, "Yanzu mun ba da rahoton lura da irin abubuwan da suka shafi yin jima'i musamman kamar kaciya, amai, da kuma wasu halaye na fitsari na gaske a cikin jerin yara maza 317 wadanda suka fara daga masu shekaru biyar da haihuwa." Tebur 34 a cikin littafin Kinsey ya qunshi waxannan bayanan: wani jariri dan wata 11 ya sha fuskantar zargin da ya nuna “farji” sau goma cikin sa'a guda; Yaro dan shekara hudu da yaro dan shekara 13 sun sami irin wannan zargin a cikin awanni 26.

Shin Dr. Prause ya bayyana yana kare ayyukan Alfred Kinsey?

TWEET # 2: Har yanzu, Staci Sprout ya kasance kawai yana magana ne akan Table 34 na rahoton Kinsey. Duk da haka RealYBOP ba ta da gaskiya game da tweet na Staci, yana mai cewa tana nufin RealYBOP "masana".

TAFIYA # 3: Har yanzu, Staci Sprout yana kan magana ne kawai ga Table 34 da Alfred Kinsey, ba karar da Reisman ya gabatar ba:

Kawai ƙarshen RealYBOP / Yi amfani da sunan dusar ƙanƙara mai banƙyama - duba wannan shafin da ke tattara bayanan RealYBOP na ci gaba da ɓata sunan Staci Sprout: CIKIN MULKI, CIKINSA DA KYAUTA DAGA CIKIN SAUKI A CIKIN SAUKI CIKIN SAUKI NA GWAMNATI

updates:

Sauran - Yuli, 2020: @BrainOnPorn (Prause) ya bukaci mabiyan su kai rahoton Staci Sprout ga Nationalungiyar ofungiyar Ma'aikata da ofasar Washington (ta hanyar sanya lambar lasisin Staci ta haramtacciyar hanya)

RealYBOP (Yi wasa) tursasawa da ɓata sunan Staci Sprout, har yanzu kuma. Yi amfani da rahoton Sprout 3 sau da suka gabata. Duk an sallame su marasa tushe: Janairu 24, 2018: Prause ya shigar da kararraki marasa tushe tare da jihar Washington game da cutar fuka.

Ka tuna cewa waɗannan tweets na RealYBOP ɗin ba su ƙunshe da komai face ƙarya. Na samar da hanyoyin domin ku gani da kanku cewa da'awar RealYBOP bai dace da hotunan kariyar da take sanyawa ba.

TAFIYA # 1: Kamar yadda kuke gani, duk abinda RealYBOP tayi da'awar baya cikin sikirin ne (sahihan labarai na RealYBOP shine ya zama zagi ta hanyar, saboda RealYBOP yana tuhumar Sprout na ainihin laifukan).

Kamar yadda aka yi bayani a sama, Sprout kawai yayi da'awar cewa Cibiyar Kinsey ta tattara bayanai daga masu lalata. Wannan ba a faɗi ba kamar tebur 34 daga sanannen sanannen rubutun nasa Harkokin Jima'i a cikin Ɗan Mutum (1948) takardu a bayyane. Duba labarin Washington Post daga 1995: BAYANIN KINSEY, FASAHA DA KYAUTA? kuma wannan video. Yi aiki kuma yayi kuskuren ambaton Hilton ambaton Table 34 da “kira ta mai lalata yara. ” A cikin 2016, Hilton ya ba da amsa ga ƙaryar ƙarya a nan: Prause ya zargi Donald Hilton, MD. Daga nan sai ta yi amfani da zanen nata don ta bayar da hujjar yin rahoton maganganu marasa kyau tare da jami'ar sa da Hukumar Kula da Lafiya ta Texas. Hakan ya haifar da Ana neman karar da laifin bata sunan. Yanzu muna da RealYBOP / Prause yana jan tarko guda tare da Staci Sprout.

TAFIYA # 2: RealYBOP ta buga lambar lasisin Staci, tana kira ga mabiya su gabatar da rahoton karya:

TAFIYA # 3: Takaitaccen tsari mai kunshe da yaudara. Bidiyo na 2 Staci Sprout tweaks RealYBOP da aka buga sun kasance daidai kuma ba a ambaci kowane mutum ko RealYBOP ba. Sauran tweets ɗin biyu ba su da alaƙa da komai, kuma babu abin da zai yi da Sprout.

TAFIYA # 4: Karya ta farko - babu komai game da Seto a cikin tweets din RealYBOP da aka sanya. Karya ta biyu - Staci bai yiwa ofisoshin jami'a alama ba. Staci yana mamakin, kamar yadda muke duka, wa zai zama mai laifi bisa ƙa'idar cin mutuncin RealYBOP da cin mutuncin sa. RealYBOP an lasafta shi a cikin kararraki 3: za a gano mutanen da ke yin rubutun RealYBOP, kuma suna iya yin tari mai yawa.

Duba wannan shafin shafi na 1: @BrainOnPorn Twitter yanzu an nada shi a cikin kararraki biyu na cin zarafi!

TAFIYA # 5: (wanda aka sanya wa shafin RealYBOP). RealYBOP ta kasance tare da abokin cin amanar ta, kuma mutum ana rama shi ta hanyar batsa babbar yarinya, David Ley:

DARVO ta Ley.

TAFIYA # 6: Membobin RealYBOP suna wasa bebe, suna ba da amsa da maganganun banƙyama don amsa tambaya mai sauƙi: “Wanene ke da alhaki don ɓata sunan RealYBOP?”Cyberstalker RealYBOP yayi tweets lambar lasisin Staci, wanda hakan ya sabawa dokokin Twitter.

Kawai ƙarshen RealYBOP / Yi amfani da sunan dusar ƙanƙara mai banƙyama - duba wannan shafin da ke tattara bayanan RealYBOP na ci gaba da ɓata sunan Staci Sprout: CIKIN MULKI, CIKINSA DA KYAUTA DAGA CIKIN SAUKI A CIKIN SAUKI CIKIN SAUKI NA GWAMNATI. Har ila yau duba - Nicole Prause qarya na wadanda aka yi wa lakabi-hood wanda ba a bayyana shi a matsayin mara tushe: ita ce mai cin zarafin, ba wacce aka azabtar.

————————————————

Yi amfani, ta amfani da asusunta na RealYBOP (ko yanzu Anti-YBOP), ta ci gaba da mulkinta na yin kutse ta hanyar yanar gizo da ɓata sunan Staci Sprout:

@BrainOnPorn yakai Staci Sprout don bayar da shawarar cewa shaƙe mata don sauka na iya zama matsala:

Halin da ake ciki na kullun cikin batsa yana da alama yana haifar da tashin hankali na mata waɗanda ake shakewa yayin jima'i. RealYBOP na kare kullun, don haka jefa duk waɗannan matan a ƙarƙashin motar batsa.

Staci ta zaren tare da karatu da labarai:

Yankan wasu ba hakkin dan adam bane ba kuma ba haqqin jima'i bane!
- Staci Tattaunawa (@Stacisprout) Satumba 11, 2020

----------

RealYBOP ta ci gaba da maganganun yanar gizo na Staci. Gaske ban mamaki rantings:

----------

RealYBOP yana bata cikakkiyar ma'ana a cikin zauren Toates. Babu wanda ke yin rahoton rahoto, balle 'yan sanda su yi rahoto. Wannan maƙaryaci ne.

RealYBOP (Sallar) cin zarafin Staci Sprout, duk da haka kuma. Duba:

PDF's of Sworn affidavits a cikin kararraki biyu na cin zarafin tarayya da aka gabatar a kan Prause

---------------

Ya ci gaba da cyberstalk Staci Sprout (wanda ke ba da shaida a kan Prause a cikin karar 2 na lalata). PDF na rantsuwar rantsuwar kama aiki a wata kotu ta daban biyu da ta gurfanar da su a gaban Salisu:

RealYBOP ya ta'allaka ne game da abin da Staci da Liz walker suka fada a zahiri:

RealYBOP yaci gaba da gabatar da bayanan karya, karya, da kuma ikirarin goro:

updates:

---------

Yuli, 2020: RealYBOP (Fuskantar) ya zargi Gary Wilson da aika barazanar barazanar mutuwa dangane da 'musayar' ra'ayoyi game da "Rashin Jima'i da Sakamakon ativearfin Mummunan Ciki a Tasirin Yin Jima'i Ga Mazaje Masu Bayanan Yin Jima'i Da Mazaje" (2020).

Mahallin: Prause tare da membobin RealYBOP 3 sun buga wani binciken wanda ba a bayyana shi ba. Bayan haka, Ley da Prause sun jujjuya sakamakon binciken da suke yi don yin zargin da'awar binciken batutuwan da suka shafi batsa: "Rashin Jima'i da Sakamakon ativearfin Mummunan Ciki a Tasirin Jima'i a Mazaje Masu Bayanan Zina tare da Maza". Babu wani abu da zai iya zama ci gaba daga gaskiya, kamar yadda na yi bayani a wannan zaren tweet 5:

1 / Yadda ake kera furofaganda: David Ley sabon gidan yanar gizon PT.
Ley ya yi iƙirarin cewa sabon binciken kan hyperexuals (addicts addicts) yana ba da hujja a kan lalata-lalata batsa.
Kamar yadda zamu gani, sabon binciken ba zai iya bamu komai game da PIED ba. pic.twitter.com / GW1RkeFqES
- Brainka a kan batsa (@YourBrainOnPorn) Yuli 8, 2020

Hasalima, RealYBOP da Ley sun bi ni da ƙarya iri-iri, kuma daga ƙarshe mahaukaciyar zargi da na yi barazanar kashe duk wanda bai yarda da ni ba. Duk wani abu don haɓaka masana'antar batsa ta hanyar ƙasƙantar da waɗanda ke ƙalubalantar ta. Kadan daga sakonnin su na tweets:

Liesarin ƙaryar, yana cewa ban sami damar zuwa cikakken karatun ba. Ba gaskiya bane, kuma zaku iya gani daga jadawalin da ke ƙasa, cewa nayi cikakken karatun.

Kara ad hominem haushi daga RealYBOP:

Bayan ad hominem hare-hare, karya Ley & RealYBOP, suna da'awar nazarin 2007 “Na so” daidai yake da binciken na yanzu. My 6-tweet thread bayyana game da kwance:

1 / Masana'antar batsa shills RealYBOP (Nicole Prause) & David Ley sun yi kuskuren gabatar da wani bincike na farko a yunƙurin da suka yi na ɓata ra'ayoyina game da rubutun Ley.
Suna da'awar binciken 2007 kuma binciken da akeyi yanzu yayi daidai. Bari mu tona asirin wannan karyar.
Ley & RealYBOP tweet: pic.twitter.com / RwmUi0JTFh
- Brainka a kan batsa (@YourBrainOnPorn) Yuli 9, 2020

Anan ga bayanin YBOP da ke bayyana karyarsu da bayanin abin da binciken zai iya kuma ba zai iya gaya mana ba: La'akari da iƙirarin da ke tattare da "Rashin Amsa da Jima'i da Tasirin Moabi'a mara kyau a Jima'i a cikin Mazaje Masu Bayanan Yin Jima'i da Maza" (2020). Anan gajeriyar siga:

Industryan masana'antar batsa da kuma mawallafin wannan takarda Prause da gefenta Dokar kuskuren da'awar cewa wannan sabon takarda shine wannan kamar yadda gwaje-gwajen da aka bayyana a cikin 2007 a cikin wani littafin babi na Bancroft da Janssen (wanda shima marubucin wannan sabuwar takarda). "Psychophysiology na Jima'i., Fasali: Tsarin Gudanar da Dual: Matsayin hana jima'i da jin daɗi cikin sha'awar jima'i da halayyar. ” Mai Buga: Jaridar Jami'ar Indiana, Edita: Erick Janssen, pp.197-222. Hanya zuwa babi
Amma duk da haka wannan sabuwar takarda ba ɗaya ce da gwaje-gwajen farko ba, kuma ga wasu bambance-bambance:
Bambanci # 1 - Nazarin na 2007 yayi hira da maza waɗanda ba za su iya tayar da hankali ta batsa don tantance abin da ke iya faruwa ba.
Na farko, ba kamar sabon binciken na 2020 ba, masu binciken 2007 sunyi hira da 50% na samari (matsakaici shekaru 29) waɗanda ba a fahimtar su da batsa ta gwaji a cikin lab, kuma sun nuna cewa ƙarancin lalata game da batsa shine wataƙila sanadin hakan. Masanan kimiyya sun yi bayanin cewa maza suna ta yin amfani da sanduna inda porn ya zama ko'ina. An fice daga binciken 2007:
Lokacin da muka yi amfani da wannan ƙirar (tare da nau'ikan fim na jima'i, sha'awa da buƙatar aiki) ga wannan sabon samfurin, duk da haka, mun ci karo da wani wanda ba a tsammani ba, amma mai ban sha'awa, sabon abu. Maza goma sha biyu, ko kusan 50% na abubuwan 25 na farko (yana nufin shekaru = shekaru 29), basu amsa kariyar jima'i ba. (watau, ƙarancin penile na ƙasa da 5% zuwa shirye-shiryen fim ɗin noncoercive; 8 maza suna da 0% tsauri). Wannan, zuwa iliminmu, ɗayan studiesan karatun na psychophysiological wanda maza suka shiga wanda aka ɗauke su daga cikin alumma - a cikin lamarinmu, daga gidajen wanka, asibitocin STD, sanduna, da sauransu.
A wajan wa annan wuraren wasannin, motsawar jima'i (gami da hotunan bidiyo) a koyaushe suke, kuma wannan, haɗe da ra'ayoyi daga mahalarta game da rashin ƙarin ƙwarewa, ƙwararrun ("alkuki"), ko matsanancin ra'ayi ko "kinky", sun sanya mu. yi la’akari da yiwuwar cewa ƙarancin yawan masu rashin amsa na iya kasancewa yana da alaƙa da manyan matakan watsawa da kuma gogewa da ainihin abin da ya shafi jima'i.s.
Bambanci # 2 - binciken 2007 da aka ƙaddara game da amfani da batsa!
Masu binciken sun kuma lura da cewa, “Tattaunawa tare da batutuwa sun ƙarfafa ra'ayinmu cewa a wasu daga cikinsu babban bayyanar cutar batir da alama sun haifar da ƙarancin ladabi ga batsa na batsa da lalata karuwar rayuwa, bambancin. "
Tattaunawar da batutuwa sun karfafa ra'ayinmu cewa a wasu daga cikinsu akwai babban zanewa ga erotica kamar sun haifar da karɓar amsa ga "jima'i na vanilla" erotica da kuma karuwa da buƙatar sabon abu da bambanci, a wasu lokuta haɗe tare da bukatun musamman irin abubuwan da suka faru don samun tasowa.
Bambancin # 3 -2007 binciken ya kara da gwaji na 2 dangane da batutuwan batsa-kadan.
Masu binciken har da ya kara gwaji na biyu don yin la’akari da batutuwan batsa. Gwajin ta biyu ta haɗa da sababbi, mafi tsayi, shirye-shiryen bidiyo da yawa, kuma sun ba batutuwa damar zaɓar shirye-shiryen kansu da kansu. Duk da haka mutane da yawa basu amsa ba!
Mun sake fasalin binciken kuma sun yanke shawarar kawar da shagala da aiwatar da buƙatun aiwatarwa da haɗa sababbi, shirye-shiryen bidiyo daban, da kuma wasu shirye-shiryen bidiyo masu tsayi. Har ila yau, a maimakon gabatar da batutuwa tare da jerin zaɓaɓɓun zaɓaɓɓu ("zaɓaɓɓen mai bincike") kawai, muna barin su zaɓi shirye-shiryen bidiyo biyu da kansu daga saiti na 10, waɗanda aka nuna samfoti na 10 a karo na biyu kuma wannan ya haɗa da mafi yawan jima'i halaye (misali, jinsin ƙungiya, jima'i tsakanin maza, S & M, da sauransu). Mun tattara ƙarin batutuwa 51 kuma mun gano cewa tare da ingantaccen ƙirar har yanzu maza 20, ko kusan 25%, ba su amsa da kyau ga shirye-shiryen bidiyo na jima'i (ƙarancin penile na ƙasa da 10% don amsa fim ɗin da aka zaɓa mai tsawo).
Gwaje-gwajen 2007 sun tantance "ƙananan masu amsawa" daban-daban, kuma sun ba da rahoton cewa: "ƙididdigar ta nuna cewa yayin da yawan finafinan batsa da aka gani a cikin shekarar da ta gabata ya karu da mai halarta mafi kusantar ana rarrabawa a matsayin mai sauƙin amsawa."
Bambanci # 4 - 2007 binciken bai tantance tsinkaye ba
Gwajin da aka yi a 2007 bai tantance rashin gaskiyar magana ba. Nazarin 2020 ya yi, kuma ya kwatanta ƙungiyar hypersexuality zuwa sarrafawa. (Duk da haka babu ƙididdigar mutum ɗaya game da abubuwan bayar da gudummawa ga ED, kamar yadda yake a 2007). Wancan ya ce, rukunin mutane na 2020 sun kasance ƙarancin amsa ga batsa fiye da rukuni na sarrafawa:
Marubutan sun yi “sarrafawa” saboda wasu dalilai sabani - domin kauda martani tsakanin kungiyoyin biyu kuma sun yanke hukuncin cewa kungiyoyin ba su yi musayar ra'ayoyi daban ba da juna. Sake nan ana iya faɗi, ba da pro-batsa juyayi.

RealYBOP ta kara “bata shi” ta hanyar karya da yawa da kuma sakonnin batanci da suka shafi ni, Gabe Deem da Staci Sprout. Bari mu bi ta cikin labaran RealYBOP na tweets masu amfani:

Ban yi karya ba. Na ce Ley ya cire zane wanda ya nuna cewa maza da mata ba su da amsa fiye da sarrafawa. Wannan gaskiyane. Tabbataccen abu - "sarrafawa don" ya ba marubutan RealYBOP damar da'awar bambanci tsakanin batutuwa da sarrafawa bashi da ma'ana. Amma takardar ba ta ba mu bayanai don bincika aikinsu ba.

Ofarin guda yaji. Bayani: Na san yadda sarrafa ƙididdiga ke aiki da yadda za a iya sarrafa su.

Bayan na buga abubuwan da nake fuskanta a game da da'awar su, RealYBOP ya tafi akan lalata t-tweet na 7-tweet. Hudu daga cikin bayanan ta na karya sun ce na yi barazanar kashe masana kimiyya. Ba ta bayar da wata hujja ba, saboda ban taba yin irin wannan barazanar ba. Wannan ya zama ɓarna ta hanyar, kamar yadda ita ke tuhumar ni da ainihin laifuka. Ina tsammani karar bata suna 2 bai ishe ta ba.

Maganar kare kai # 1. Babu wanda ya rabani da ni (tana da tabbacin babu wanda zai karanta “shaidar” ta a zahiri):

Harafin ACLU ba abin da RealYBOP ke faɗi ba ce. Duba: Nicole Prause & David Ley sun yi ƙarya a shari'ar ɓatanci (Satumba, 2019).

Maganar kare kai # 2: Karyata ikirarin na sanya binciken 2007 akan sau 100,000 kuma nayi barazanar kashe duk wanda bai yarda da ni ba. Shaida cewa ta rasa hankalinta?

Ga nazarin 2007 tare da duk abubuwan da suka dace: Samfurin Gudanar da Dual - Matsayi na hana Jima'i & Jin daɗi A Tashin Jima'i da Zama (2007).

Ba ta faɗin gaskiya, kamar yadda marubutan suka ce batsa ya haifar da batutuwa 'rashin karɓar jima'i. A cikin gwajin amfani da batsa na bidiyo, 50% na samari ba za su iya tayar da hankali ko cimma buri ba tare da batsa (matsakaita shekaru 29). Masu binciken da suka firgita sun gano cewa lalacewar maza “dangane da manyan matakan da ke nunawa da kuma kwarewa tare da kayan aiki na jima'i.”Menan ragwayen sun kwashe lokaci mai yawa a cikin sanduna da gidajen wanka inda batsa take“ ko'ina, ”kuma suna cigaba da wasa. Mutanen sun yi bayanin hakan "babban bayyanar cutar batsa da alama ya haifar da ƙara mayar da martani ga “Eticilla sex” erotica da karuwar buƙatar sabon salo da bambancin ra'ayi."

Maganar kare kai # 3: Bayan banda da'awar karya Ina yin barazanar kisa, ikirarinta game da stats ba su da mahimmanci. Binciken 2007 ya ce amfani da batsa ya haifar da rushewar jima'i.

Maganar kare kai # 4: An fallasa ƙarairayin RealYBOP a nan: La'akari da iƙirarin da ke tattare da "Rashin Amsa da Jima'i da Tasirin Moabi'a mara kyau a Jima'i a cikin Mazaje Masu Bayanan Yin Jima'i da Maza" (2020)

RealYBOP ta kara da wannan tweet din, tana mai bayyana cewa ba ta san ma'anar rashin kuzari ba:

Wannan ba shine karo na farko da Prause ko asusun baƙon sa ba (RealYBOP) ya zarge ni da wasu game da aika barazanar kisa. Ko ta yaya, Prause bai taba bayar da shaidar ni ko wani na san na tura barazanar mutuwa ba. Duk qarya da cin zarafi ya shigar da karar sa da laifi a kotunan Tarayya Duba: Nicole Prause qarya na wadanda aka yi wa lakabi-hood wanda ba a bayyana shi a matsayin mara tushe: ita ce mai cin zarafin, ba wacce aka azabtar.

updates:

Agusta, 2020: Gary Wilson (Brainka a kan Porn) Ya Samu Nasara ta Shari’a Ga Masanin Sexologist Nicole Prause kokarin da yayi na shi

An yi watsi da ƙoƙarin hana umarnin dakatar da amfani kamar yadda ba shi da kyau: ta bashi kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin adawa da SLAPP (Mataki na ashirin da - Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP).

ASHLAND, OREGON: Agusta 16, 2020: Fitaccen marubuci kuma mai ba da shawara kan kiwon lafiyar jama'a Gary Wilson ya sami nasarar shari'a a kan mai binciken ilimin jima'i da mai ba da labarin batsa Nicole Prause. A ranar 6 ga watan Agusta, Babban Kotun Kananan Hukumomi na Los Angeles ya yanke hukuncin cewa yunƙurin Prause don samun umarnin hana a kan Wilson ya haifar da “mummunan shari’a game da shigar jama'a” (wanda ake kira “shari’ar SLAPP”). A takaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta wulakanta tsarin hana aiwatarwa don tursasa Wilson yin shiru kuma ta danne hakkinsa na fadin albarkacin baki. A doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wa Kira su biya kuɗin lauyan Wilson.

Wilson marubuci ne mafi kyawun littafin sayarwa Your Brain On Porn: Intanit Pornography da kuma Kimiyya Kimiyya na Addiction, mai gabatar da shahararren magana game da TEDxGwajin Tsohon Porn, ”(13+ miliyan views) da kuma rundunar na yanar gizo www.YourBrainOnPorn.com, hanyar share fage don sabon bincike, kafofin watsa labarai, da rahotannin kai game da illolin batsa da cutarwa. Wilson ya daɗe ya yi biris da binciken bincike da aka buga Prause da bayanan jama'a game da amfani da batsa.

"Abin mamaki ne cewa masana'antar batsa suna lulluɓe kansu cikin kariya ta Kwaskwarimar Farko yayin da masu gabatar da batsa kamar Nicole Prause suke ƙoƙari su iyakance da yin shiru game da maganganun da ke rubuce game da cutar batsa ga masu amfani da ita da kuma jama'a., ”In ji Wilson bayan hukuncin Kotu. "Wannan wata muhimmiyar nasara ce a kan ɓarna da zalunci da aka samu ta hanyar masu ba da shawarwari waɗanda ke yin magana a bainar jama'a game da illolin batsa. "

Nasarar shari'a ta zo ne a gaban korafin da aka yiwa SCRAM Media na UK saboda buga wani labari da aka yada na karya cewa Prause ya sami "barazanar kisa" sakamakon yaƙin neman zaɓe da ƙungiyar NoFap, Alex Rhodes ya bayar. A cewar wani Sanarwa daga Burtaniya, Labarin SCRAM ya ba da gaskiya cewa NoFap da Rhodes sun haɗa kansu da masu tsattsauran ra'ayi na dama (ciki har da anti-Semites); tilasta wa masu tsattsauran ra'ayi su matsa wa Prause; gudanar da wani taron jama'a wanda ya kai ga an hana Prause; da kuma gabatar da kararraki a Kotun Tarayya ta Amurka don tsawaita binciken ilimi na Prause. Lokacin da aka gabatar da hujjoji da ke musanta waɗannan iƙirarin, SCRAM ya maimaita labarin, ya biya hodanyan ɓarna da kuɗaɗen doka, da nemi afuwa a bainar jama'a, kafin rufewa gaba daya.

An gabatar da karar ne a cikin wasu kararraki biyu na tarayya da ba su da alaka da ita da ake zargin ta da yin kalamai na karya da kuma lahani game da mutanen da suka yi korafin batsa ta yanar gizo: Donald L. Hilton, Jr. v. Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Gundumar Amurka don Yankin Yammacin Texas San Antonio Division, Magana mai lamba 5: 19-CV-00755-OLG; da Alexander Rhodes da Nicole Prause, et al., Kotun Lardin Amurka don Yankin Yammacin Pennsylvania, Magana mai lamba 2: 19-cv-01366. A wa] annan hukunce-hukuncen, masu shigar da kara sun yi zargin ba da gaskiya, maganganun batanci da ake zarginsu da aikatawa, cin zarafin jima'i, da akidar wariyar launin fata, da kuma ikirarin cewa suna gudanar da bincike ne ta hanyar tilasta bin doka da kuma kungiyoyin masu ba da lasisi. A kowane yanayi, maza da mata da yawa sun gabatar da wasu kalamai da ke nuna cewa Prause ma ya yi niyya ga su: sanarwa # 1, sanarwa # 2, sanarwa # 3, sanarwa # 4, sanarwa # 5, sanarwa # 6, sanarwa # 7, sanarwa # 8, sanarwa # 9, sanarwa # 10, sanarwa # 11, sanarwa # 12, sanarwa # 13, sanarwa # 14, sanarwa # 15, sanarwa # 16.

Agusta, 2020: Dama tun kafin Anti-SLAPP ta saurari lauyan Nicole Prause ta yi kokarin dainawa saboda ta yi kokarin tilasta shi ya nuna halin rashin da'a. Ya ce Prause na nuna adawa da barazanar kai shi kara.

Kowa na iya gabatar da umarnin hana shi ba tare da biyan ko sisi ba. A takaice dai, hanya ce mai matukar tsada don yunƙurin ƙara amincin ga yaƙin neman zaɓen ɓatancin da Prause da 'ya'yanta ke bi. Na yi imanin cewa, a wani ɓangare, yunƙuri ne na murkushe maganata kamar yadda take fata ba zan iya kare kaina ba. Da farko ta fadawa alkalin cewa ni talaka ne ("ba abinda ya rasa") a cikin bukatarta ta TRO. Ta yiwu ta ɗauka ni ba ta da kuɗi ne saboda, duk da cewa ina da dalilai masu yawa, ban taɓa shigar mata da karar ɓata suna ba. Ba na son ɓata lokaci na.

Nayi imanin yunkurin hana ta shine har ila yau, yunƙurin ɓata ni a matsayin mai shaida a cikin ɓata suna biyu da wasu suka shigar game da Prause. Abin ya faskara, kuma a yanzu ya ƙara bata mata suna. Me ke faruwa around.

Kamar yadda aka fada a sama, alkalin farko ya karyata Yi amfani da umarnin takaita wucin gadi a watan Fabrairu, 2020, lokacin da ta shigar da shi ba tare da sanarwa a wurina ba. Wannan alama ce mai ƙarfi a gare ta cewa tana da rauni. Karyatawa game da TRO yana nufin cewa Prause dole ne ya sanar da ni game da umarnin hanawa, kuma an saita shi don sauraro na farko (wanda ya haifar da ji na biyu, kamar yadda Prause ba ta yi mini hidimar daidai ba).

A cikin watanni 3 masu zuwa, Yin wasa na iya barin umarnin hanawa ba tare da wani tasiri ga kanta ba, kuma da na kasance tare da kuɗin lauya na ba tare da neman taimako ba. A watan Yuni, wani sashi don kauce wa kasancewa a gaban gabatarwa a zaman da aka shirya a watan Yuli, kuma a wani bangare saboda mayar da martani ga zargin da ake yi na ba da izini ba game da barazanar da ta yi mata don murkushe muryata, na shigar da anti-SLAPP motsi don dakatar da umarnin hana. A wancan lokacin, tana iya ci gaba kawai. Takaddun kotu sun gabatar a cikin ƙarar da nake yi na adawa da SLAPP:

Na shigar da motata a wani bangare saboda Prause yana da fara marin karar kananan kararraki mara izini da kotu ta shigar a kan mutane, wanda ke buƙatar a yiwa waɗanda ake tuhuma aiki a cikin CA. Na kasance mai karfin gwiwa cewa za ta yi min hidima da daya daga cikin kararrakin karar da ta shigar a kotu idan na zo CA na ba da shaida kan sauraren karar.

Kamar yadda ya bayyana, alƙalin ya haɗu da batutuwan biyu, kuma duka Prause da ni mun sami damar shiga nesa (saboda Covid 19). Wannan ya kiyaye ni daga zuwa koina kusa da ita, alhamdu lillahi. Wataƙila ya bayyana cewa, banda barazanar ta da jiki, Na kasance mai guje wa kasancewarta. Kotun na ranar 5th na watan Agusta da ke amsawa ga sanarwar Juli na 29 Yuli:

Jim kadan gabanin sauraron karar a ranar 6 ga watan Agusta, lauyan nata ya yi kokarin ficewa daga wakiltar ba tare da nasara ba. Daya daga cikin dalilansa, a cewar Bayaninsa, shi ne cewa tana yunƙurin tilasta shi yin halin rashin da'a, wato, yin abin da ba zai iya yi da kyakkyawar niyya ba. Mun san daga takaddar da ya gabatar don neman ci gaba cewa ta yi ƙoƙari ta sanya shi ya gabatar da “shaidu” da yawa da ba za a yarda da su ba (wataƙila ta hanyar wasiƙu daga ƙawayenta, da kuma zarge-zargen da ba su da tallafi), don haka muna zargin yana nufin wannan.

Lauyan nata ya kuma nemi ya janye saboda a bayyane yake yana barazanar da shi saboda ba zai yi mata tayin ba. Ya bayyana cewa sadarwa tare da Gwadawa ba ta da tabbas. Wannan ya faru ne bayan da ya mayar da martani game da motsata na anti-SLAPP (kuma babu wani aikin doka da za a yi da ƙarar saurarar kansa).

Alkalin ya yanke shawarar kada a jinkirta sauraron karar, kuma Lauyan lauyan kamfanin ne ya wakilci Prause, wanda ya yi aiki mai kyau a madadinta - duk da cewa ba shi da aiki kadan a lokacin da za a yi aiki da duk wata hujja. (Alkalin a shari'ar bata sunan Alex Rhodes kwanan nan ya ɓace wa matadilator hali da obfuscation ”).

Mako guda kafin sauraron Anti-SLAPP, An yi amfani da Prause akan Twitter yin sanarwar karya cewa tana da “umarni na kariya” a kaina, tana tunzura mabiyanta masu kwazo don yin lalata da ni:

Duk da haka wata karyace mai girman gaske. Kuma ba ɗaya wanda yawancin alƙalai zasuyi da alheri ba.

Ba zato ba tsammani, don ba da shawarata ta adawa da SLAPP, dole alkalin ya gano (1) cewa umarnin hana ta da wuya ya yi nasara bisa cancantarsa, kuma (2) cewa, a zahiri, ƙoƙari ne na danne haƙƙoƙi na yi magana a kan maslaha ta jama'a.

Layin da ke ƙasa shi ne cewa Prause ya kawo asarar motsi na anti-SLAPP a kan kanta ta hanyar yin rajista, sannan ba ta faduwa ba, umarnin hana ta mara tushe a kaina. Ta shawo kanta ta hanyar barazanar lauyanta da kuma sanar da cewa ta ci nasara ba tare da bata lokaci ba. Har yanzu, ita ce mai aikata laifin ba wanda aka azabtar.

Tsarin doka ba kafofin watsa labarai bane, kuma kirkirar “shaidu” da zarge-zargen karya da ita da makarrabanta suka watse a kotun ra’ayin jama’a ba ya tashi a kotunan gaskiya. Wannan shine dalilin SCRAM ya ɓace lokacin da ta buga karairayinta, kuma hakan ba zai haifar da da mai ido ba a cikin biyun biyun da ya dace da ita.

Agusta, 2020: A cikin umarnin hana takunkumi na Prause (wanda aka yi watsi da shi ba shi da wani amfani) ta ƙirƙira abin da ake kira “shaida,” wanda ya haɗa da yin lalata da ɓata ɗana.

A cikin bukatar da Prause ta yi na hana ta ta yi wa kanta lahani, tana cewa na sanya adireshinta a kan YBOP da Twitter (ɓarna ba wani sabon abu bane da Salisu). A cikin mafi tsayi na tatsuniyoyi, Prause ta yi iƙirarin cewa ni mai haɗari ne saboda ni da ɗana babba mun kasance “masu sha'awar bindiga” waɗanda “ba abin da za su rasa.”

Ta yi ikirarin “tabbatar” da hakan ta hanyar hada da wani tsohon hoto da aka dauka na dana (wanda ya fi shi tsayi) da kuma wani saurayi dan Asiya mai kyau da bindiga. Yi amfani da'awar ya fi guntu, 20-wani abu saurayi ne ni! Yi amfani da gangan ya ɓatar da kotu.

Abin da ke sama ɗayan hotuna uku ne na ɗana wanda aka shigar dashi cikin buƙatunta na ƙuntatawa. Yi amfani da bincika ta ɗana masu zaman kansu Facebook don gano duk wani hoto da zata iya bata fahimta.

Gaskiya: Ni ko dana ba mu da bindiga. Hoton da ke sama daga 2014 ne, kuma Mataimakin Sakataren Sacramento sheriff ne ya ɗauke shi a ɗakin ajiyar makamai na soja (don samari 2 su yi amfani da shi azaman janareta na meme). Ya kasance wargi. Kamar yadda bayani ya gabata (a ƙasa) ɗana ya ɗauki watanni da yawa yana aiki tare da Ma'aikatar Shari'a ta California, yana gina sabuwar fasahar IT don taimakawa ressionungiyar Danniyar Gang tare da ayyukanta. Kamar yadda ɗana ya bayyana a cikin rantsuwar rantsuwarsa, ɗayan mutumin ya kasance mai horo a kamfanin fasaha.

Wannan mummunar bayanin, wanda aka samo ta ta hanyar yin hira da ɗana, cikakken misali ne na yadda Nicole Prause ta ƙirƙira abin da ake kira “shaida”.

Agusta, 2020: Masu shiryawa na 5th taron kasa da kasa kan al'amuran ƙari bijiro da Fuskantarwa kamar aikata rantsuwar karya a yunƙurin da ta gaza a umarnin hanawa (watau nasarar Anti-SLAPP)

Tare da “shaidar” a cikin asalin TRO dinta wanda aka fallasa a matsayin maganganu na karya, sanarwar da aka gabatar a watan Yulin shekarar 2020 (wanda aka shirya don sauraron karar a ranar 6 ga watan Agusta) ya sake sabon labari game da tafiyata zuwa kasar Jamus shekaru biyu da suka gabata (2018) don halartar 5th taron kasa da kasa on Abun ƙyama (ICBA). Yi aiki da shaidar zur a cikin sanarwar TRO, da ƙaryar da'awar cewa ita mai gabatarwa ce don wannan taron na ICBA, kuma na yi tafiya zuwa Jamus ne kawai don "fuskantar ta." Maganar banza, amma duk da haka yawancin adawar adawa ga anti-SLAPP yanzu sun dogara akan wannan maganganun ƙarya ɗaya.

Ga ɗaya daga cikin batutuwan 5 daga sanarwar da ta kawo a watan Yuli wanda ke nuni da tafiya ta zuwa Jamus:

Hukuncin da ya biyo bayan ikirarin da ta yi a Jamus na nuna cewa:Ko hakan gaskiya ne ko a'a.”Bari in taimaka: Ba gaskiya bane. Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa tafiya ta Jamus ta kasance “da tushe na buƙatar Prause na yanzu don taimako.”Idan kowane bangare na labarin Jaridar Prause ta Jamus ya warware, to duk shari’arta ta wargaje kamar Humpty-Dumpty. Bugu da ƙari, wannan shawarar da aka ambata a hankali ita ce kawai "shaida" lauyan Prause ya ba da ƙarfin bayarwa:

Bayan haka, Prause ta ci karo da lamura da yawa inda ta yi imanin cewa mutumin da ba a tantance ta ba ya bincika. Ko wannan gaskiya ne ko a'a, tushen buƙatar Prause na yanzu don taimako shine bayyanar rikice-rikicen rikice-rikicen cikin barazanar arangama ta zahiri.

Na san wannan bunkum ne don haka na tambaya Masu shirya ICBA don tabbatar da hakan Ba a taɓa yin tambaya don gabatarwa ba kuma ba a yi masa rajista don taron ba. Wasikar da ke tabbatar da cewa Prause ta la'anci kanta:

An kama a cikin wani ƙaryar kuma.

Kawai don rikodin, Prause bai taɓa halarta ba ko an gayyace shi don gabatarwa a taron ICBA. Yin amfani ba ya gaskanta da halayyar ɗabi'a. Duk tsawon aikinta Prause tana da ya yi yakin game da manufar cin zarafin hali, musamman jima'i da buri.

Agusta, 2020: Dangane da nasarar da na samu na shari'a, @BrainOnPorn (Prause) ya ci gaba da yin lalata da yanar gizo da lalata suna

A watan Maris na 2020, Prause ta nemi umarni na hana wucin gadi na wucin gadi (TRO) akan ni ta amfani da “shaida” da aka kirkira da kuma karyar da ta saba (karyata zargina da bi). A cikin buƙatar Prause na umarnin hana ta ta la'anci kanta, tana cewa na sanya adireshinta a kan YBOP da Twitter (ɓarna ba wani sabon abu bane da Salisu). Na shigar da kara a gaban Prause don amfani da tsarin shari'a ba bisa ka'ida ba ta hanyar tilasta ni in dauki lauya da fatan yin shiru da tursasa ni. A ranar 6 ga watan Agusta, Babban Kotun Kananan Hukumomi na Los Angeles ya yanke hukuncin cewa yunƙurin Prause don samun umarnin hana ni ya zama wani mummunan abu kuma wanda ba shi da doka “a shari'ar dabaru game da halartar jama'a" (galibi ana kiranta da "SLAPP kwat"). A takaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta wulakanta tsarin takunkumin don kokarin tursasa ni yin shiru kuma ta danne hakkina na fadin albarkacin baki. A doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wajan biyan kuɗin lauya na.

A cikin martani, RealYBOP ya zare zaren da nake fallasa ta kamar yadda tayi da lalata da ɗana ta hanyar yanar gizo, da kuma bata masa suna a cikin umarnin ta na ha'inci na yaudara (wanda Kotun ta jefa shi a matsayin cin zarafin wofi). Rashin imani mara kyau.

Fiye da ƙari RealYBOP & Yi amfani da wasiƙun da aka cika da ƙarya waɗanda abokai masu kusancin batsa suka rubuta (galibi membobin RealYBOP) bisa umarnin Fuskantarwa. Ta yi ƙoƙari ta shigar da 4 daga waɗannan haruffa a cikin umarnin hana ta na yaudara, amma alƙali ya ga dama ta hanyar su a matsayin ƙage (marubutan wasiƙun sun sake faɗar abin da Prause ya gaya musu - waɗanda ƙarya ce, ba tare da wata babbar shaidar tallafi ba.

Haruffa 4 da aka zana a cikin tweet na RYBOP na sama, wanda Prause ya yi tweeted sau da yawa, bai faɗi abin da ta ce sun faɗa ba. Babu wani daga cikin marubutan da ya ce na yi wa mawallafansu bita. Haruffa da ba a taɓa amfani da su ba sun ƙunshi ainihin hujja don tallafawa da'awar Prause. Takaitaccen bayani game da haruffa 4 da take bata wakilci da yawa a tweets dinta:

Daga Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da ya faɗi game da ni ko Yin wasa.
Daga Rebecca Sullivan ta Kanada. Wasikar mai shafi 2 tana da layin amai guda daya game da ni, tana cewa na kawo takaitaccen bayani kan Motion na Kanada 47. Babu wani abu kuma.
By Madita Oeming. Ba ta taɓa da'awar cewa na sa mata ido ko yi mata barazana ta kowace hanya ba. Madadin haka, Oeming yayi kuka saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da tallafi da'awarta. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita karairayin Prause… amma ba tare da wata shaida ba.
Wasikar karshe ta kasance tatsuniya ce ta Daniel Burgess, wanda ya mallaki RealYBOP, ya yi amfani da laƙabi don yin magana da ni ta yanar gizo, kuma shi ma ya shiga cikin maganganu da yawa na ɓata suna. Gaskiya game da Burgess da ma'amalar mu sosai rubuce a wannan shafin. Ayyukan doka suna ci gaba da Mista Burgess, gami da magance tweets na kwanan nan (duba ƙasa) wanda ya zarge ni da aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa da bin mata 5. Duk maganganun da aka rubuta sau da yawa a Twitter sun zama bata suna ta hanyar, wanda shine mafi sauki irin na bata suna don samun sassauci a cikin kararrakin bata suna.

A kan ƙarin lalata sunan Prause, ba da ƙarfi ba da ƙarfi a bayan sunan laƙabi na RealYBOP. Troarin fashewa:

Wannan abin ƙyama ne mai ban mamaki. RealYBOP tweeting cin mutunci a karkashin matar Matt Fradd na bikin ranar bikin aurensu:

Defarin ɓata suna ta Prause da Burgess.

RealYBOP ta ci gaba da guguwar bata suna tana zargina da wani laifi na gaskiya (bin sahun), tana cewa YBOP tana barazanar kashe “mu.” Babu wata hujja, kamar yadda Prause ba ta da wata hujja ta tursasawa ko hargitsi don neman umarnin hana ta da ake yi na zamba. Kotun ta yanke hukuncin cewa umarnin dakatarwar na Prause ya zama wani mummunan abu kuma wanda ba shi da doka “a shari'ar dabaru game da halartar jama'a" (galibi ana kiranta da "SLAPP kwat"). Amincewa da yin ƙarya a duk lokacin da take neman yaudarar TRO, yana bayarwa sifilin tabbataccen shaida don tallafa mata da'awar waje cewa na tsane ta ko na takura mata. Bugu da kari, a zahiri, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta wulakanta tsarin takunkumin don kokarin tursasa ni yin shiru kuma ta tauye haƙƙoƙin 'yanci na. A doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wajan biyan kuɗin lauya na.

Tsoro ya kama RealYBOP “kimiyya!” LOL. Na warware shafin binciken rashin dacewar shafin tuntuni - Kimiyyar Yanar-gizo ta Kashe Kasuwanci (AKA: "RealYourBrainOnPorn.com" da "batsaResearch.com")

Karo na shida? Me take fada? Haka ne, mun rasa shawarar WIPO (wanda abin birgewa ne), amma ba shari'a ba ce. Mun sami nasarar bin matakan shari'a da suka shafi cin mutuncin kasuwancinta, kuma daga ƙarshe an ba mu izinin cin zarafin URL. An kuma fallasa wani aikin shari'a wanda ya shafi Fuskantar (nasarar da na samu na SLAPP) ta a matsayin makaryaci kuma mai son shiga (harma da dana dana). Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP.

Arin ɓata suna da ƙarairayi. Bugu da ƙari, Na shigar da kara takaddama guda tak a kan ta, ya zuwa yanzu, kuma Kotun ta samu goyon baya na.

Ayyukan doka sun ci gaba cikin nasara don dakatar da ƙetare alamar kasuwanci ta RealYBOP da Daniel Burgess: Hankali: YBOP ya sayi www.RealYourBrainOnPorn.com a cikin yarjejeniyar cin amanar kasuwanci

updates:

Agusta, 2020: LifeSite News na bugawa Ganawar Gary Wilson; Yi amfani da fitina da ɓata sunan marubuci, yana barazanar ɗaukar matakin doka (ba shakka).

A cikin farkawa ta nasarorin shari'a a kan Nicole Prause, LifeSite News ya buga wannan hira mai zuwa: Anti-porn crusader ya ba da cikakken bayani game da nasarar da doka ta samu kan 'prof prof' wanda ya yi kokarin amfani da kotu don rufe shi: Nicole Prause ta shigar da kara Gary Wilson, wacce ta yi masa mummunan fata a kokarin bata sunan binciken da yake yi na yadda batsa yake da illa. Ya ci nasara.

Kamar yadda ya faru da Diana Davison's Bada Millennial bijirar ', Yi amfani da asusunta na laƙabi (BrainOnPorn) ya takura wa marubucin, ya yi karya game da abin da labarin ya fada, kuma ya yi barazanar shigar da kara. Ga Tattaunawa na tuggo a karkashin marubucin Jonathan van Maren's tweet na labarinsa:

Tweet's tweet ya ƙunshi hoton hoton wasiƙar rambling mai cike da ƙarya (ba gaskiya ba Cease & Desist) don SASH. Yi amfani da jerin abubuwan zalunci da ni da wasu suka aikata mata, amma babu ɗayansu da ya faru. An yi watsi da wasikar Prause zuwa SASH, da tarin abubuwan da aka kirkira a matsayin zalunci mara tallafi, wanda aka kirkireshi don Karanta zai iya sanya shi a kan kafofin watsa labarun kamar yana da halal. Kawai ƙari kai-tsaye Prausian "shaida." Hukumar SASH tana sane da cewa Yin amfani da sirrin ɓatanci ne wanda ke ɓata lokacin ta na fargaba da yawan burinta.

Yi aiki kuma yayi ƙarya game da abun da labarin Van Maren ya ƙunsa. Babu wata ɓata suna, domin duk abin da ke ciki gaskiya ne. Babu wani abu daga cikin abubuwan da ta rubuta a shafin ta na Twitter cewa ta yi.

As zaka iya karantawa, labarin LifeSite bai ce komai ba game da Yin lalata da yara ko kuma zama mai aikata laifi. An yi amfani da Prause da ƙarya me, Don Hilton, Staci tsiro, da sauransu na kiranta yarinya mai lalata yara. Yana daya daga cikin dabarun da ta fi so. Da yake lalata kanta, An bayyana a cikin takaddun kotu da aka shigar a akwatin adawa da na SLA da kuma a Laifin cin mutuncin Hilton, cewa mun kira ta yarinya mai lalata. Ba a ba da shaida ba don tallafawa wannan karyar da ake maimaitawa (har ma da lallashi pals Jim Pfaus da Taylor Kohut su maimaita wannan karyar a cikin wasikun da aka gabatar a karar da na ci). Tsuntsayen gashin tsuntsu suna kwance tare.

Haka kuma labarin bai ce Prause ta kasance "mai laifi," duk da cewa ta shiga cikin mummunan hali ta (1) tana jingina kanta a takardun kotu, (2) shigar da rahoton policean sanda na yaudara, da (3) shigar da rahotanni da korafi zuwa hukumomin gwamnati. Yin amfani kuma yana da laifi na batanci, tsoratarwa, tsokana, da kuma yin amfani da yanar gizo.

Haka kuma labarin bai faɗi cewa Yi wasa "ana kallon mutane suna yin jima'i" a cikin dakin binciken ta ba, kodayake tana iƙirarin ita ya haɗa batutuwa har na firikwensin EEG kuma yana kula da su yayin da ake al'aurarsu (wani lokacin zuwa inzali). Shin "kallon" mutane suna yin jima'i?

Abin da yake gaskiya shi ne cewa an ba wa Prause nauyin kuɗi don samar da karatu-bindiga a kan dauke da ƙafa da kuma kasuwanci ne mai “Orgasmic tunani” makirci (yanzu a fili yana ƙarƙashin bincike daga FBI). Karatun Orgasmic MLM ne mai ruɗin asiri ne wanda cajin manyan kuɗaɗe don koya wa maza yadda ake bugun duri da duwawun abokin aure. Talla don karatun OM na karatu, ya nuna mutumin yana lalata da mace (kuma bidiyo):

Duk abin da kuke so ku kira shi, Fuskantar yana sa ido kan batutuwa yayin da ake lalata su (ko, kamar yadda ta kira shi, “haɗin kai”).

Ba a gamsu ba, Yi amfani da ita @BrainOnPorn lissafi zuwa bata sunan Jonathon Van Maren tare da zargin mahaukata cewa yana yiwa mata barazana kuma yana goyon bayan barazanar mutuwa. Ta kuma yi barazanar LifeSite News tare da kara:

Abinda ke sama shine na karshe a cikin tweets goma da RealYBOP tayi a karkashin tweet na Van Maren na Gabe Deem ingantaccen bidiyo yana kiran Prause da Ley saboda dabarun rashin ɗabi'ar da aka ɗauka daga littafin Big Tobacco. Amfani da @BrainOnPorn, Anyi amfani da shafin yanar gizo na tweets guda 22 suna wulakanta Gabe, da karyata cewa Gabe ya aiko ta, da wasu mata, mutuwa da barazanar fyade (wata kara ta ɓata suna a wajen?).

Wannan bidiyo ta @gabedeem , game da yadda handfulan tsirarun masana ilimi ke haskaka jama'a a madadin PornHub, abin kallo ne: https://t.co/9NDaU30sCJ
- Jonathon Van Maren (@JVanMaren) Agusta 25, 2020

Kamar yadda aka ambata, Yi wasa da laƙabarta (RealYBOP) sunyi abu daya ne ga Diana Davison bayan Davison ya fallasa 'of Prause, tare da ~ 20 tweets a cikin zaren Diana dauke da barazanar, bata suna, da wasikar C&D cike da karya. Prause ta kasa bin C&D mara tushe tare da duk wani aikin doka, a ƙarshe ta cire duk tweets ɗinta. Duk haushi, duk ɓatanci, duk lokaci.

Gunaguni ya aika da wasiƙun C & D kamar sauran mutane suna aika katunan hutu. Ta aiko ni da mai gidan yanar gizo na 7 C & D - duk waɗannan ba su tafi ba. Da yawa suna kan shafukan Shafukan da aka danganta su a cikin labarin Van Maren (duba hanyoyin haɗi zuwa sassan kasa rubuta yawancin C & D wanda duk muka zaɓi kar mu amsa). Ta aika C & D's mara tushe ga Gabe Deem, Staci Sprout, Rob Weiss, Stefanie Carnes, Linda Hatch, Alex Rhodes, mai masaukin yanar gizo, matata, Millennika na Post, da kuma Diana Davison, don kaɗan. Duk ba a yi watsi da su ba a matsayin barazanar fitina. Yin wasa ba ya gabatar da kararraki na bata suna; da alama inshorar aikinta kawai ta kare tsaro, ba da niyyarta ba.

Anan ga tsohuwar tarihin ta na C & D, wanda ba ta yi aiki da shi ba:

Yawancin B. & D's na kwanan nan sun sanya hannu ta Wayne B. Giampietro. A gani na, Prause ya rubuta C & D's da Giampietro sun sanya hannu akan sunan sa. A nan ne mai buga kwallon: Giampietro na ɗaya daga cikin manyan lauyoyin da ke karewa Shafin baya.com. Gwamnatin tarayya ta rufe shafin yanar gizon "saboda saukin kai da fataucin mutane da karuwanci." (Duba wannan USA Today labarin: NUMididdigar 93-ƙididdiga game da tuhumar fataucin masu jima'i da aka bayyana a kan waɗanda suka kafa shafin Backpage). Don cikakkun bayanai game da sa hannun Giampietro duba: https://dockets.justia.com/docket/illinois/ilndce/1:2017cv05081/341956. A wani yanayi na daban Shafin baya.com kadarorin Arizona suka kwace, tare da lauya na Prause Wayne B. Giampietro LLC da aka jera a matsayin asarar $ 100,000. Shin Giampietro lauya ne na masana'antar jima'i? Me yasa zai wakilci Yin wasa?

Anan Yi amfani da sharhi azaman GaskiyaWinsOut a ƙarƙashin labarin LifeSiteNews. Ba komai bane face karya da batanci (wata kara ta bata suna a cikin aikatawa?)

Kotuna sun yanke hukunci cewa Prause ba ta da shaidar ni na bi ta (alkali ya watsar da umarnin hana ta na bogi & ya ba da motsi na na SLAPP). Gunaguni yayi asara, amma yayi ikirarin cin nasara akan yanar gizo. LOL.

updates:

Sauran - Agusta, 2020: Dangane da bidiyon Gabe Deem "Littafin Littafin batsa," @ BrainOnPorn ya buga sama da 20 na cin mutunci da raina tweets (da karyar cewa Gabe ta aiko da barazanar mutuwa da fyade)

Gabe Deem ya ba da kyakkyawan bidiyo yana kwatanta dabarun da Big Taba ke amfani da su tare da dabarun ƙawayen masana'antar batsa (misali, David Ley da Nicole Prause).

Bidiyon Gabe ya haifar da masana'antar batsa shill RealYBOP ta afkawa Gabe da ɓata sunan ta. Samu wannan - RealYBOP ya sanya tweets ashirin da biyu a cikin awanni 24, da nufin Gabe. An sanya wasu tweets a cikin zaren da suka kasance watanni 2-3. Dayawa sun kunshi batanci da se, tare da RealYBOP na karyar cewa Gabe ya aiko da barazanar kisa da fyade. RealYBOP yayi hali kamar na gaskiya. Gabe yana da shekara guda don yanke shawara idan yana so ya kai kara.

Ku sani cewa komai na RealYBOP tweets karya ne. Yana farawa da hauka… kuma yana da hankali.

Tweet #1

Tweet # 2 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 3 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 4 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 5 niyya Gabe (tsohuwar zaren wata 5!):

Tweet # 6 niyya Gabe da ni:

Tweet # 7 niyya Gabe da ni:

Tweet # 8 niyya Gabe (tsohuwar zaren wata 10!):

Tweet # 9 niyya Gabe (tsohuwar zaren wata 2!):

Tweet # 10 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 11 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 12 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 13 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Tweet # 14 niyya Gabe. Ta tweets haruffa 4: babu wanda ya ce komai game da Gabe da ke cin zarafin kowa. Ofaya daga cikin haruffa huɗu akwai Madita Oeming yana maimaita ƙarairayin Prause da na yi birgima. Amma wani alƙali ya riga ya yanke hukunci cewa Prause yana kwance, kuma ya ba ni nasarar SLAPP: Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP.

Tweet # 15 niyya Gabe (Gabe bai taba tara kuɗi don kowa ba);

Tweet # 16 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Babu wata kungiya da ke aiko da barazanar kisa. Ofarin ƙaryar ta.

Tweet # 17 mai niyya ga Gabe:

Rushewar ƙasa: memba na RealYBOP Alan Mckee, yana wulakanta kullun, ya saka ƙarya ta Hankali a cikin sabon littafinsa. Mckee yayi ikirarin cewa Nofap yakai hari ga "masanin kimiyar mata" (wannan ya fito ne daga Prause), amma duk da haka Prause ne wanda yake aikatawa, kai hari da lalata sunan Alex Rhodes na nofap. Don haka, RealYBOP tana ambaton kanta ne, amma duk da haka kotu ta yanke hukunci cewa iƙirarinta na bin sahun marasa gaskiya. Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP.)

Tweet # 18 da ke niyya ga Gabe (Jonathon Van Maren yana nuna cewa babu ɗayan hotunan hotunan RealYBOP da ke goyan bayan duk abin da ta tweeted):

Tweet # 19 mai niyya ga Gabe. Yanzu da Van Maren ya fallasa RealYBOP a matsayin ƙarya, sai ta bi shi da kansa (yana hana zubar da ciki):

Tweet # 20 mai niyya Gabe.

Tweet # 21 niyya Gabe, Van Maren da ni:

Tweet # 22 mai niyya Gabe.

Tweet # 23 mai niyya Gabe.

updates:

Agusta, 2020: Don guje wa dakatarwa ta dindindin don ƙeta alamar kasuwanci, Yi amfani da suna da asusun RealYBOP na Twitter. Sabon littafinsa na karya ya ce na shigar da kararraki 7 don cire asusun Twitter na RealYBOP.

Ya ɗauki ɗan lokaci, amma ni yanzu own Rajistar Alamar kasuwanci ta Amurka Lambobi 6098839, 6098840, da 6038579 don "Brain On Porn," "YourBrainOnPorn.com" da "YBOP." Don kaucewa dakatarwa ta Twitter har abada, RealYBOP ya canza suna zuwa “Yake Duk da haka kwakwalwarka a kan batsa ”:

Yi aiki ya canza tarihin RealYBOP, yana ƙara wannan ƙaryar:

Masana Ilimin Gaskiya. Hakikanin Bayanai. Brain On Porn yana ƙin ainihin ilimin kimiyya sosai ya gabatar da kararraki 7 don saukar da sharhinmu.

Yanzu yakai kararraki 7 ?? A hakikanin gaskiya, na gabatar da kara guda daya kawai (don amsa bukatar neman hana karya ta Prause, kuma na ci nasara: -Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP. Wancan ya ce, Na aika 'yan kaɗan kuma na daina wasiƙu da suka shafi alamar kasuwanci mai cin zarafin yanar gizo www.realyourbrainonporn.com (ba asusun Twitter ba):

A ranar 1 ga Mayu, 2019 na aika C&D ga duk waɗanda suka bayyana a bayan RealYBOP (the RealYBOP “Masana”). PDF na Harare & Rubuta wasiƙa zuwa Nicole Prause (Mayu 1, 2019. a gaskiya, Daniel Burgess shi ne mai mallakar rikodi.
Da zarar an gama mallakar mallakina, sai lauyoyi na suka aika C&D zuwa Daniel Burgess (Satumba 2, 2020). PDF na wasiƙar C & D.

Har yanzu ba a shigar da kara a kotu ba game da RealYBOP ko kuma shafin Twitter. Don haka ana kama Prause a cikin wata ƙaramar ƙarya.

RealYBOP yana kuka game da canza sunansa:

Ayyuka na doka masu zuwa.

updates:

Agusta, 2020: Labaran RealYourBrainOnPorn (Faɗakarwa) ya samo asali ne daga kuskuren Brian Watson mai cike da kuskure, sa'annan ya shirya su cikin shafin Wikipedia na Nofap.

Kinsey grad, mai ba da laburari, da kuma kusanci Mai amfani, Brian Watson buga wani yanki mai cike da kuskure, wanda RealYBOP ta cire kamar gaskiya ne. RealYBOP (Faɗakarwa) kuma ya kirkiro newan sabbin kayan sockpuppets na Wikipedia don shirya ƙirar Watson a cikin Nofap Wikipedia shafi.

Gabatar da takarda Watson:

Watson ya ɓata mini suna, ya ƙaryata game da YBOP, da kuma binciken da aka gabatar a can (kamar yadda RealYBOP ke da shi):

GASKIYA: Zan fi mai da hankali kan bayanan labarin game da ni da gidan yanar gizo na www.yourbrainonporn.com (YBOP), amma na yi imanin gyarawa mai zuwa yana kan tsari (maida hankali, a zahiri).

Watson ba ya ambaci cewa ni marubuciya ce kuma marubuciya ce, bi da bi na abubuwa biyu da aka yi nazari a kan su, ba kuma na koyar da ilmin jikin mutum da kimiyyar lissafi na shekaru XNUMX ba. Kuma ba ya Watson ambaci cewa ni ne marubucin littafin mafi kyawun sayarwa tare da bincike-bincike na ƙwararru, kuma masana suka amince da shi: Brainka a kan batsa: Intanit batsa da kuma ilimin kimiyya na buri. Ba zato ba tsammani, duk littafina na ci gaba zuwa sadaka mai rijista, ta hanyar yanke jiki Watson'iƙirarin cewa duk wanda ya ambata suna raba bayanai game da haɗarin haɗarin batsa na dijital don samun fa'ida.

A madadin bayanan da ke sama game da ni, Watson tsunduma cikin ad hominem bayanan da aka ce suna tallafa musu da ambato guda huɗu - shimfiɗa uku da ɗan gajeren sharhi. Babu ɗayan ɗayan kasidun guda huɗun da ke ƙunshe da kalma game da ni, gidan yanar gizo na YBOP, ko bincike mai zurfi da aka tara a wurin. Bayyanawa WatsonMummunar son zuciya, mai ɗaukar hoto David Ley ya rubuta biyu daga cikin labaran guda huɗu wanda shine a halin yanzu hada hannu tare da katuwar batsa xHamster don inganta rukunin gidan yanar gizon ta "Stripchat" da ayyuka.

Watson ya bayyana yana nufin duka Yakin Sabon Magungunan (FTND) da YBOP lokacin da suke tabbatarwa:

Duk wani abu da ya wuce gwajin larura, duk da haka, ya nuna cewa ƙungiyoyin suna wasa cikin fahimtar ilimin jama'a game da jama'a. Abubuwan da'awar da karatun da aka ambata sune, mafi yawanci ba haka ba, ba a tsara su da kyau ba, ba da kuɗi ta hanyar zato, yaudara, ba daidai ba aka samu, ko kuma kawai ƙarya ne kawai (Ley 2018; Shekarar 2018; Bradley et al. 2016; Mialon et al. 2012; Warin et al. 2016; Wilt et al. 2016). Matsalolin da aka samo daga kafofin zai zama bayyananne ga duk wani mai karatu a laburare kan kimanta kayan aiki: da yawa daga cikin mujallu da aka ambata suna da taken suna, ba sa aiki, ko kuma kungiyoyin da aka ambata a cikin wannan labarin sun ba su kuɗi.

Amma duk da haka babu Watson ba kuma ambaton tallafi suna ba da misali guda ɗaya na “tuhuma ko“ ɓatarwa ”” da aka buga akan FTND ko YBOP. Kamar yadda yake a sama, babu ɗayan WatsonRubutun shida sun faɗi wani abu game da ni ko YBOP. Hankula na WatsonKaratuttukan karatun rashin kulawa, ambato guda huɗu daga cikin 6 ma ba su da alaƙa da nesa Watsonikirarin. Wannan damfara ce ta ilimi.

Ayyukan ambaton takardu waɗanda ba su da mahimmanci ko ba sa goyon bayan maganganun ɓatarwa ne kuma ba ya haɓaka fahimtar kimiyya ko fahimtar jama'a. Sauran takardun an sake cire su don ƙasa da ƙasa.

A zahiri, rukunin yanar gizo na ya ƙunshi karatu sama da 1,000 kai tsaye dangane da amfani da batsa. Wannan shafin yana shirya da yawa daga cikin karatun zuwa bangarorin da suka dace: Bincike Mahimmanci. Misali, wannan jerin ya ƙunshi nazarin 270 a kan matasa da yin amfani da batsa (tare da sake nazarin 16 na wallafe-wallafen) - duk rahoton mummunan sakamako da ya shafi amfani da batsa. WatsonMaganganun da ba su da tallafi zai sa mai karatu ya gaskata cewa duka 270 “karatun zamba ne,” alhali jerin sunayen suna wakiltar fifikon bincike a fagen daga marubutan da ake girmamawa sosai.

Har ila yau, yi la'akari Jerin YBOP na kowane binciken nazarin jijiyoyin da aka buga akan masu amfani da batsa. Yayinda dukkanin nazarin 53 suka ba da rahoton binciken daidai da tsarin jaraba, WatsonMaganganun da ba su da tushe sun sa mai karatu ya yarda cewa duk 53 ba su da kyau ko kuma suna da shakku sosai. A wane lokaci ne malalacin malalaci ya tsallaka cikin farfaganda mai tayar da hankali?

Yi la'akari da jerin YBOP na a kan nazarin 110 da ke danganta amfani da batsa ko amfani da batsa ko jarabar batsa ga lalatawar jima'i da talauci na jima'i da dangantaka mai gamsarwa. Yawancin karatun suna da tsayi ko gwaji. Watson, wanda ke nuna cewa "pseudoscience" ne don YBOP don faɗakar da baƙi cewa batsa ta yanar gizo ta yau da kullun tana haifar da lalacewar aiki a cikin wasu masu amfani, ya kasa sanar da masu karatu cewa kusan duk yawan binciken da ake yi game da rahoton maza game da mafi yawan amfani da batsa dangane da talauci jima'i ko dangantaka gamsuwa. Yawancin takaddun da aka yi nazari game da takwarorinsu da kuma fitattun masana sun ba da damuwa game da yin amfani da batsa ta yanar gizo da yawa da kuma lalata jima'i. Za a iya bayar da ƙarin misalai.

Gudun ma'auni na WatsonLabarin, masu karatu masu wayewa zasu lura da wasu maganganun na yaudara ko na karya. Misali, Watson an bayyana a cikin kuskure cewa Yakin Sabon Magungunan yana da Nofap LLC. Shin irin wannan bayanin na ƙarya zai iya tona asirin wannan jaridar ta sakaci ga hukuncin shari'a don ɓata suna ko wasu ayyukan shari'a da waɗannan 'yan kasuwar biyu suka yi? Shin mujallar na iya yin la'akari da yadda aka juya abin da ya zama kamar labarin da ba shi da tallafi sosai da ɓarnatar da ɓatancin kungiyoyi da mutanen da Watson rashin jituwa kan dalilan akida?

Ta amfani da laƙabi, Yi amfani sannan kuma edita Brian Watsonfarfaganda a cikin shafin Wikipedia na NoFap (Ba ni da alaƙa da NoFap):

Lissafi # 9 shine Brian Watson's labarin. Abubuwan 2 na kwanan nan sunyi amfani da sockpuppets sannan suka saka datti na Watson:

Yi amfani da laƙabi (wanda aka ɗauka) an saka shi a cikin Nofap Wikipedia shafi na irin wannan karya wacce RealYBOP / Prause suka yi tweeted sau 5 a makon da ya gabata. (Baƙi na Wikipedia za su ga “Tgeorgescu,” wanda shi ne edita na dogon lokaci wanda ke aiki da ƙarfi, ba da kunya ba da kariya ga gyararrun abubuwa ta hanyar sockpuppets na Prause):

RealYBOP a nan yana ƙirƙirar faifai yana faɗar Brian Watson, tweeting shi sau da yawa:

Misali:

Mai hankali ya mari baya? Kai ne mai hukunci. Anan ne nayi tsokaci game da nazarin dan mambobin RealYBOP Sam Perry:

Wani tweet da ke nuna batancin Brian Watson:

Kuma wani:

Abin dariya. NoFap da YBOP suna “samun kuɗi sosai”…. kamar masana'antar batsa, daidai? LOL. Anti-magana ka ce?

Kotuna basu yarda ba. Babbar Kotun Angelesasar ta Los Angeles ta yanke hukuncin cewa mummunan ƙoƙarin da Prause ta yi don samun umarnin hana ni ya zama wani mummunan abu kuma wanda ba shi da doka “a shari'ar dabaru game da halartar jama'a" (galibi ana kiranta da "SLAPP kwat"). Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta ci mutuncin tsarin aiwatar da umarnin hana ni yin shiru da kuma danne masa ‘yancin fadin albarkacin baki. A doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta wajan biyan kuɗin lauya na.

RealYBOP ya sanya ƙarin bayanan farfaganda da ƙaryar Brian Watson:

Agusta 7, 2020: Wani tweet, tare da maƙaryacin ƙarya, wanda zai iya zama tushen tushen ƙararraki ta hanyar ko dai Alex Rhodes ko FightTheNewDrug. Daga cikin wasu rashin daidaito, Watson ya faɗi ƙarya cewa Nofap.com mallakar FightTheNewDrug ne:

———————————————————————

Na yi imel ɗin mai zuwa ga editan mujallar. Brian Watson yana cikin yaudarar ilimi (kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin wannan imel ɗin):

Editan Edita,
Ina matukar damuwa da rashin daidaito da yawa a ciki wannan labarin kwanan nan, wasu daga cikinsu an jera su a ƙasa. Abin takaici, fagen nazarin batsa yana da rikice-rikice, kuma yana da sauki ga marubuta da masu bita su ba da izini don cimma dalili. Ban tabbata ba wanda ya duba wannan gabatarwar don mujallar ku, amma saboda yawan kurakurai da maganganun da ba su dace ba a cikin yanki, Ina jin tsoron wannan rarrabuwa ya canza launin marubucin da tsarin dubawa a nan.
Zan fi mai da hankali kan bayanan labarin game da ni da gidan yanar gizo na www.yourbrainonporn.com (YBOP), amma na yi imani gyarawa mai fa'ida tana kan tsari.
Watson ba ya ambaci cewa ni marubuciya ce kuma marubuciya ce, bi da bi na abubuwan da aka yi nazari a kan ƙwararru, ko kuma na koyar da ilmin jikin mutum da na ilimin halittar jiki na shekaru ashirin. Kuma ba ya Watson ambaci cewa ni marubucin littafin mafi kyawun sayarwa ne mai cike da bincike-bincike na ƙwararru: Brainka a kan batsa: Intanit batsa da kuma ilimin kimiyya na buri. Ba zato ba tsammani, duk littafina na ci gaba zuwa sadaka mai rijista, tana yankewa Watson'iƙirarin cewa duk wanda ya ambata suna raba bayanai game da haɗarin haɗarin batsa na dijital don samun fa'ida.
A madadin bayanan da ke sama game da ni, Watson tsunduma cikin ad hominem bayanan da aka ce suna tallafa musu da ambato guda huɗu - shimfiɗa uku da ɗan gajeren sharhi. Babu ɗayan ɗayan kasidun guda huɗun da ke ƙunshe da kalma game da ni, gidan yanar gizo na YBOP, ko bincike mai zurfi da aka tara a wurin. Bayyanawa WatsonMummunar son zuciya, mai ɗaukar hoto David Ley ya rubuta biyu daga cikin labaran guda huɗu wanda shine a halin yanzu hada hannu tare da katuwar batsa xHamster don inganta rukunin gidan yanar gizon ta "Stripchat" da ayyuka.
Watson ya bayyana yana nufin duka Yakin Sabon Magungunan (FTND) da YBOP lokacin da suke tabbatarwa:
Duk wani abu da ya wuce gwajin larura, duk da haka, ya nuna cewa ƙungiyoyin suna wasa cikin fahimtar ilimin jama'a game da jama'a. Abubuwan da'awar da karatun da aka ambata sune, mafi sau da yawa ba haka ba, ba a tsara su da kyau ba, ba da kuɗi ba bisa kuskure, yaudara, ba daidai ba aka samu, ko kuma kawai ƙarya ne kawai (Ley 2018; Oeming 2018; Bradley et al. 2016; Mialon et al. 2012; Wéry et al. 2016; Zai kasance et al. 2016). Matsalolin da aka samo daga kafofin zai zama bayyananne ga duk wani mai karatun laburare a kimanta kayan aiki: yawancin labaran da aka ambata suna da taken suna da shakku, ba sa aiki, ko kuma kungiyoyin da aka ambata a cikin wannan labarin sun ba su kuɗi.
Amma duk da haka babu Watson ba kuma ambaton tallafi suna ba da misali guda ɗaya na “tuhuma ko“ ɓatarwa ”” da aka buga akan FTND ko YBOP. Kamar yadda yake a sama, babu ɗayan WatsonRubutun shida sun faɗi wani abu game da ni ko YBOP. Hankula na WatsonKaratuttukan karatun rashin kulawa, ambato guda huɗu daga cikin 6 ma ba su da alaƙa da nesa Watsonikirarin.
Aikin ambaton takardu waɗanda ba su da mahimmanci ko kuma ba sa goyon bayan maganganu yana da damuwa, ɓatarwa ne kuma ba ya ci gaban ilimin kimiyya ko fahimtar jama'a.
A zahiri, rukunin yanar gizo na ya ƙunshi karatu sama da 1,000 kai tsaye dangane da amfani da batsa. Wannan shafin yana shirya da yawa daga cikin karatun zuwa bangarorin da suka dace: Bincike Mahimmanci. Misali, wannan jerin ya ƙunshi nazarin 270 a kan matasa da yin amfani da batsa (tare da sake nazarin 16 na wallafe-wallafen) - duk rahoton mummunan sakamako da ya shafi amfani da batsa. WatsonMaganganun da ba su da tallafi zai sa mai karatu ya gaskata cewa duka 270 “karatun zamba ne,” alhali jerin sunayen suna wakiltar fifikon bincike a fagen daga marubutan da ake girmamawa sosai.
Har ila yau, yi la'akari Jerin YBOP na kowane binciken nazarin jijiyoyin da aka buga akan masu amfani da batsa. Yayinda dukkanin nazarin 52 suka ba da rahoton binciken daidai da tsarin jaraba, WatsonMaganganun da ba su da tushe sun sa mai karatu ya yarda cewa duk 52 ba su da kyau ko kuma suna da shakku sosai. A wane lokaci ne malalacin malalaci ya tsallaka cikin farfaganda mai tayar da hankali?
Yi la'akari da jerin YBOP na a kan nazarin 110 da ke danganta amfani da batsa ko amfani da batsa ko jarabar batsa ga lalatawar jima'i da talauci na jima'i da dangantaka mai gamsarwa. Yawancin karatun suna da tsayi ko gwaji. Watson, wanda ya nuna cewa "pseudoscience" ne don YBOP don faɗakar da baƙi cewa batsa ta yanar gizo ta yau tana haifar da lalacewar aiki a cikin wasu masu amfani, ya kasa sanar da masu karatu cewa kusan duk yawan binciken da ake yi akan rahoton maza shine mafi yawan amfani da batsa dangane da talauci. ko gamsuwa ta dangantaka. Yawancin takaddun da aka yi nazari game da takwarorinsu da kuma fitattun masana sun ba da damuwa game da yin amfani da batsa ta intanet da yawa da lalata jima'i. Za a iya bayar da ƙarin misalai.
Gudun ma'auni na Watsonlabarin, Na lura da wasu maganganun na yaudara ko na karya. Misali, Watson an bayyana a cikin kuskure cewa Yakin Sabon Magungunan yana da Nofap LLC. Shin irin wannan bayanin na karya zai iya sanya mujallar ku zuwa kotu don ɓata suna ko wasu ayyukan shari'a da waɗannan 'yan kasuwar biyu suka yi?
Don Allah a sani cewa WatsonAn riga an fara amfani da labarin a matsayin kayan aikin farfaganda ta shafin yanar gizo na Realyourbrainonporn na pro-porn.
Shin za ku iya yin la'akari da watsi da abin da ya zama kamar labarin da ba a tallafi sosai ba da kuma ɓoye ɓarnatattun kungiyoyi da mutanen da Watson rashin jituwa kan dalilan akida? A kalla, ina fata za ku dage cewa Dr. Watson tuntuɓi duk waɗanda aka ambata a cikin labarin tare da nufin gyara kurakurai da yawa don amfanin masu karatu.
Na sa ido in ji daga wurin ku.
Gaisuwa mafi kyau,

--------------------------

updates:

Agusta, 2020, zuwa gaba: Sabbin sababbin asusu guda shida (mai yiwuwa Yi amfani da sockpuppets) shirya Shafin Wikipedia na Nofap, shigar da karairayi da yawa kwanan nan tweet by Prause & RealYBOP (yanzu Anti-YBOP).

Yin amfani yana da dogon tarihi na ƙirƙirar sockpuppets don saka farfaganda da ƙarya a cikin shafukan Wikipedia da suka shafi batsa (Yarda da Sabuwar Drug, NoFap, Batsa na batsa, Halin batsa, MDPI, da sauransu). Arshen Shafin Wikipedia shenanigan-iceberg:

Za'a buƙaci kundin encyclopedia don yin rikodin ayyukan mugunta ta hanyar yawan sunayen Wikipedia da yawa na Prause (sockpuppets):

Asesananan sunayen laƙabi na 6 a cikin lissafin da ke sama sun zama sabbin sockpuppets na kwanan nan sun saka abubuwan gyara a cikin shafin Wikipedia na Nofap. Abubuwan gyaran sockpuppets suna cikin rawaya. Maballin: Na ja hankali kan editan Wikipedia Georgescu tunda shi ne firaministan da ke kare abubuwan gyara na Nicole Prause daga sharewa. Suna aiki a matsayin ƙungiya don ɓata suna da shigar da bayanan ƙarya da ɓatarwa a cikin shafukan Wikipedia da yawa (Nofap, FTND, Batsa na Batsa, Tasirin Batsa, Jima'i, da sauransu).

A ƙasa na ba da 'yan misalai na gyare-gyaren sockpuppets a shafin Nofap:

----------

Marubucin masanin ilimin halayyar dan adam ya zabi wasu 'yan bidiyo YouTube wadanda suka fito a takaitaccen binciken "nofap". Ba wasa ba. Sannan ta zare wasu yan layi don tallafawa ajandar ta. BATA tantance Nofap ko membobinta ba. Mara amfani mara kyau:

Idan kuna da wata shakka, ga RealYBOP tweeting game da takardar cewa babu wanda zai iya samu:

-----------

Bigaramar ƙarya uku ta Prack 'sockpuppets:

1) Wasikar neman gafara ta Roland Imhoff bai ce komai ba game da wata barazanar doka - saboda babu su. Ga wasiƙar neman gafara na Imhoff - Dalilan Mazaje don Kaurace wa Masturbation Ba za su iya yin nuni da hukuncin sake yin gidajen yanar gizo ba - wanda ya ce babu ɗayan batutuwan da ke membobin NoFap (Imhoff ba daidai ba ya ba da alama a cikin bincikensa na asali cewa batutuwan sun fito daga NoFap):

Kamar dai yadda ta yi a kan Wikipedia, Yi amfani da karyar da'awar cewa binciken Imhoff ya tattara batutuwa daga NoFap. Har wa yau Prause / RealYBOP na ci gaba da aika sakon tweet cewa karatun Imhoff yana kan membobin NoFap.

2) Labarin Scram: Duk karyace ta hanyar Amfani. Na farko, Scram ya sami tallafi daga babban kuɗi kuma yana da kamfanin lauya da ke wakiltar ta. Na biyu, Gwadawa tana barin abin da ta ciyar Labaran Scram fakitin karairayi game da Alex da Nofap, wanda hakan ya haifar da karar. Na uku, babban labari shine karyar Prause ta haifar Labaran Scram fita kasuwanci. Cikakkun labaran a nan: Gidan watsa labarai Labaran Scram tilasta su nemi afuwa & biya diyya mai yawa don wallafa ƙaryar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes & NoFap.

3) Ta yi ikirarin cewa akwai barazanar karar da Nofap, amma mahaɗin bai faɗi haka ba. Ya ƙunshi yan tweets kaɗan ta NoFap da ke gunaguni game da editocin da aka tsara don sarrafa Wikipedia.

-----------

Karya: Babu wanda aka yi wa barazana kuma babu wata hujja game da wannan a cikin hanyar haɗin da aka ambata.

----------

Bayyanawa da ambato daga sabon littafin memba na RealYBOP Alan Mckee. Mckee ya yi ikirarin, ba tare da gamsassun tallafi ba, cewa Nofap ya fi karfi ya afkawa “mata masana kimiyya.” Wannan ya fito fili daga Yin amfani, duk da haka shi ne Prause wanda shine mai aikatawa, ya kai hari da ɓata sunan Alex Rhodes na NoFap, da sauransu da yawa.

A 'yan kwanakin da suka gabata RealYBOP ta wallafa sakonnin karyar da ta ciyar da Alan Mckee (kuma daga baya aka sanya a Wikipedia).

Yadda ake kera furofaganda.

---------------

Da yake ambaton takardar wanda marubucin ya saurari wasu randoman bidiyon YouTube da ke ambaton NoFap kuma ya yanke hukunci game da waɗanda ke barin batsa.

Bugu da ƙari, Yi amfani da matsayin RealYBOP tweeting da takarda daga baya ta shirya cikin Wikipedia. Tweeter duk karya ne. Babu wani abu a cikin takarda game da misogyny ko liwadi. Ta ambaci maganata na TEDx a wucewa. Shi ke nan.

Ko ta yaya, takardar ta kasance rikici ne daga masanin ilimin zamantakewar al'umma wanda a hankali ya zaɓi wasu 'yan maganganu da bidiyo na YouTube don tallafawa ƙaddarar da aka zaɓa na raina maza don dawowa.

---------

Anan wani ya kawo karya-cike Mataimakon labarin da ke nuna Prause, David Ley, PornHub da wakilan Xhamster. (Lura: David Ley shine nsaboda hada kai tare da XHamster don inganta rukunin yanar gizon sa kuma Pornhub shine asusun farko don sake tura sakon farko na RealYBOP.)

Jin dadi sosai Duba Shin Nicole Farko ya shawo kan masana'antar Porn?

--------------

An tattauna kuskuren Brian Watson bugawa a cikin wannan ɓangaren: Agusta, 2020: Labaran RealYourBrainOnPorn (Faɗakarwa) ya samo asali ne daga kuskuren Brian Watson wanda ya cika kuskure. Yi amfani sai a gyara karyar Watson a cikin shafin Wikipedia Nofap.

RealYBOP ya wallafa wannan kalaman na batanci akalla sau 20 a cikin sati 3.

---------

Ya sake ambata Kinsey grad Brian Watson, amma karya ne. NoFap ba ta taɓa neman ko karɓar kuɗi daga “ƙungiyoyin addinai” ba.

Labarin Watson cike yake da labaran karya kuma ambaton nasa bai fadi abin da yake ikirarin suna yi ba. Wannan lamari ne na yaudarar ilimi, bayyananne kuma mai sauki.

---------

Liesarin ƙarya daga kuskuren Brian Watson. A cikin wannan mai ba da labarin, Watson ya yi da'awar ƙarya cewa ƙarar da Alex Rhodes ya ɓata sunan Nicole Prause yana da hannu sosai daga NCOSE da Mormon Church.

--------

Liesarin ƙarya. Sockpuppet na Prause ya yi ikirarin cewa NoFap ta yi barazanar kai kara The Spectator. Duk da yake The Spectator maimaita karyar da Prause yayi, NoFap bai taba yin barazanar kai kara ba. Anan zaku iya karanta wasiƙar NoFap kuma editan ya yarda ya gyara kurakuran marubutan: https://web.archive.org/web/20210104022332/https://spectator.us/nofap-proud-boys/

Yi aiki da RealYBOP sunyi tweeted sau da yawa cewa Alex Rhodes da Nofap suna da ƙungiyoyi (ko Nofap yana da goyan bayan Proud Boys). Wannan ɗayan ɗayan lokuta ne na ɓatanci da aka bayyana a cikin karar Rhodes game da Gwadawa: NoFap kafa Alexander Rhodes karar ɓatanci game da Nicole Prause / Liberos.

Duk da yake an dakatar da mummunan asusun ta @BrainOnPorn a mako guda don cin zarafi, Nikky ta kirkiro wani sabon abu saka karya - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Faustinecliffwalker

---------

Kai tsaye bayan masana'antar batsa ta kamfanin shill twitter (@BrainOnPorn) an dakatar dashi na dindindin don tursasawa da cin zarafi, ta kirkiro 5th sockpuppet zuwa saka karin farfaganda - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:NeTAbygO

----------

Disamba 10, 2020: Wani mai yiwuwa Yi amfani da gyaran sockpuppet Nofap - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/JackReacher2018.

The gyara abun sakawa daga cikin mahallin quote:

---------

Abinda ke sama shine kawai ƙarshen Yin amfani da icberg idan ya zo game da ɓataccen bayani game da Alex Rhodes da Nofap: Nicole Prause, David Ley & @ BrainOnPorn na dogon tarihin tursasawa da ɓata sunan Alexander Rhodes na NoFap

Sauran - Agusta, 2020: RealYBOP ta ce tara kudin DJ Burr don kaninsa mai shekaru 14 da ke tsare ya zama zamba. Da ƙarya ya zargi Burr da sa ido, ya ce ya kamata ya haɗu da ɗan'uwansa a kurkuku.

Gwadawa ya hargitsa kuma yayi barazanar mai ilimin kwantar da hankali DJ Burr a baya - har ma da mummunan rahoto game da shi ga Ma'aikatar Lafiya ta Washington saboda tsoro don tsayawa gare ta akan Twitter. Amma harin da aka kai wa Prause ya wuce mummunan abu.

RealYBOP ta ce yunƙurin DJ Burr na tallafawa ɗan'uwansa ɗan shekara 14 wanda hukumomi ke zaluntarsa, ya zama yaudara. Ita irin wannan maƙaryaciyar ce - babu wanda ya tsoratar da kowa. Shigar da NCOSE abu ne mai ban mamaki kamar yadda DJ bashi da alaƙa da NCOSE (bai taɓa magana a wurin ba, babu komai…).

Labarin baya daga DJ. Daya na tweets da yawa:

DJ ya kafa a tara kudi don 'yan uwansa na kare shari'a:

Boyewa da tsoro don zama sunan laƙabarta, Fuskantarwa ta haɓaka, ɓata sunan DJ, da'awar cewa yana da hannu tare da neman jiki da barazanar mutuwa. Sannan tana yiwa DJ barazana.

Mugu, kawai kash.

RealYBOP ta zargi da yawa daga cikinmu da saɓo ko aika barazanar kisa. Shine ta tafi-karya, maimaita ad gidan kayan gargajiya.

A nan ne abu: Yi zargin da ake zargi me na farauta, don haka na shigar da kara a kanta - kuma na ci nasara, na kafa ta kotuna cewa Yin amfani da mai laifi ne, ba wanda aka azabtar ba - Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP.

Lura: Wannan wani misali ne na Fuskantarwa cikin tsoratar da shaida kamar yadda DJ Burr ya ba da rantsuwa kan karar da Alex Rhodes ya shigar da ita na ɓatanci -Nuni # 6: DJ Burr, LHMC affidavit (2 pages).

updates:

Agusta, 2020: Yi amfani da fatarar fayiloli don tsere wa abin alhaki don 3 har yanzu ba a yi kokarin gurfanar da karar batanci ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc), kuma ku guji biyan ni bashin lauyan-bashin da ta jawo (a cikin Anti-SLAPP nasara)

Kamar yadda aka fada a wani wuri, a ranar 6 ga Agusta, 2020 the Babbar Kotun Kalifoniya tayi watsi da bukatar hana amfani da doka ta Prause a kaina kuma ta ba da goyon baya na adawa da SLAPP. Ta hanyar doka, asarar da ake nufi da Fuskanci dole ne ya biya kuɗin lauya na (wasu $ 40,000) da zaran alƙali ya albarkaci takardun ainihin adadin bashin. Mako ɗaya ko makamancin haka, An shirya Prause da abokin aikinta Greg Siegle don ba da takardunsu a cikin batun ɓatancin Alex Rhodes da aka gabatar game da Prause. Har ila yau, an riga an shigar da Twitter, kuma yana shirin juyawa zuwa Rhodes asalin @BrainOnPorn asusun Twitter (gidan da ya fito fili na lalata mafi girma na Prause).

Bayan haka, a watan Agusta 18, 2020 - ranar da ta gabata farkon abin da za a fara - Yi amfani da kara fatarar kuɗi. Ta yi haka ne don kaucewa biyan ni bashin lauyan da ta ciyo, da kuma kokarin tsallake abin dogaro kan dukkan laifuka uku na batanci da aka yi mata: Donald L. Hilton Jr v. Nicole Prause da Liberos LLC, Lamarin Babu: SA: 19-CV-00755-OLG; Alexander Rhodes v. Nicole Prause da Liberos LLC, Shari'a Mai lamba 2: 19-CV-01366-MPK; kuma Aaron M. Minc, Esq v. Melissa A. Farmer da Nicole R. Prause, Lamarin Babu: CV-20-937026.

NOTE: Na kirkiro wannan bangare ne a watan Disamba na shekarar 2020, wata hudu bayan Yi amfani da shi don fatarar kuɗi. Gunaguni bai bar ni zabi ba, kamar yadda ta yi iƙirari a twitter cewa ta yi ta jujjuya daga bashin lauyanta tare da fatarar fatara ta wata hanya da ke nuna cewa an “kawar da nasarar anti-SLAPP” A ranar 4 ga Disamba, ta ba da amsa ga wata tsohuwar zaren wata 2 da ke bayyana don da'awar ƙarya cewa (1) an jefar da karar ɓata sunan Hilton da Rhodes, kuma (2) an kawar da nasarar da na samu na anti-SLAP (duka biyun ƙarya ne):

My nasarar doka ta tsaya. Babu wani abu da aka juyawa: Bukatar yaudarar da aka nema don umarnin hanawa ya kasance an watsar (ba tare da cancanta ba), kamar yadda hukuncin Anti-SLAPP ya yanke. An ba da amintar da shan kayen doka, kuma babu abin da ya canza wannan.

Yi hankali, Gwadawa ba ta da iyaka. Ta kawai watsar da yawancin kadarorin ta zuwa asusun ritayar ta (sama da rubu'in dala miliyan), kuma ta jera wani ɗan ƙaramin bashin mabukaci (ƙasa da $ 3,000). Iƙirarinta na rashin kuɗi kusan ya dogara ne akan m abubuwan alhaki daga abubuwan cin mutunci na sama (wanda wataƙila ba a taɓa zuwa kotu ba), tare da wasu $ 40K da za ta ciyo min da zarar alƙali ya albarkaci adadin.

Don cimma "insolvency," Prause's fatarar takardu ta yi da'awar cewa tana bin ni $ 100,000 (maimakon $ 40,000), kuma shari'ar Hilton da Rhodes sun kai $ 150,000 a bashi (lokacin da ba ta bin su wani abu tukuna). Amma yaya game da farashin shari'a na Prause, kuna tambaya? Shin ba zasu taimaka mata ba? Babu alama babu, kamar yadda kamfanin inshorar ta ke biyan duk wata tsadar doka a cikin karar bata suna!

Abubuwan da aka lalata suna da tsada ba a amfani da komai, yayin da Alex Rhodes Don Hilton ya kashe kuɗi mai yawa don shawo kan magungunan doka don yin amfani da lalata da zalunci na Prause. A takaice, ainihin bashin da aka yi wa Prause, gami da abin da ta binta, bai kai $ 50K ba, yayin da dukiyarta ta kasance sama da $ 250K. Ba tare da kalubale ba, fatarar kuɗi ya ba da izinin yin amfani da shi don kauce wa adalci, don zubar da jinin waɗanda ke hannun kuɗi ta hanyar kuɗin doka, da kuma ci gaba da ɓata musu suna da musguna musu ba tare da wata iyaka ko sakamako ba.

Tare da kashe kuɗaɗenta, Fuskantarwa tana jan ƙararraki, yayin da Rhodes, Hilton & Minc suka kashe babban $$$. Anan, alƙali ɗaya yayi gargaɗi Yin amfani da ladabi da ladabi:

Ara wa farashin da suke ƙaruwa, Rhodes, Hilton da Minc suna adawa da Amincewa da shigar da ƙararrakin cin mutuncin su. A yadda aka saba, ganganci da kuma mummunan aiki (kamar aikin "sarautar ta'addanci" na Prause ta lalata rayuwar mutane tare da ɓata suna da rahotanni marasa tushe) ba za a fitar da su ba. Koyaya, alƙalai na iya samun ƙarshen sandar wani lokacin. Ina tsammanin wannan shine dalilin da ya sa akwai tsarin roko.

Bugu da ƙari, Yi amfani da jinkirta ganowa kuma ya ɓatar da kowa har zuwa daren da za a tumɓuke ta, sannan ta shigar da fatarar kuɗi. Wadannan bayanan doka da Hilton & Rhodes suka gabatar sun nuna cewa Prause ta shigar da fatarar kuɗi don gujewa saukewa da kuma ba da takardu. Me take boyewa?

An cire daga Alex Rhodes ya gabatar da adawa:

An cire daga Don Hilton ta cin nasara filing:

Kuna iya tunanin cewa fatarar kuɗi zai iya jinkirta ƙaddamar da fitina ta ɓatanci da tursasawa. Quite akasin haka, a matsayin ɓatanci da tursasawa da ita @BrainOnPorn wanda aka ce masa fashe fashewa, da niyyar Hilton, Rhodes, Wilson da wasu waɗanda suka gabatar da takaddama a shari'ar ɓatanci na Hilton & Rhodes. @BrainOnPorn jam'iyyun da aka yiwa niyya a cikin karar bata suna tare da har zuwa 170 masu lalata da raunin tweets kowace rana!

Shafuka masu zuwa:

Agusta, 2020: Takaddun fatarar kuɗi na Prause sun ƙaryata labarin da take yawan maimaitawa cewa ta sauya gidanta “sau da yawa” saboda ana neman ta (da farko Gary Wilson, ba shakka).

A cikin tweets, tambayoyi, labarai, da takaddun kotu, Prause ta sha yin da'awar cewa tana motsawa koyaushe saboda yawancin dillalai suna numfashi a wuyanta (galibi ni). Duk wadannan maganganun karya ne. Domin kusan shekaru 8 Gwadawa yana ci gaba da yin wannan iƙirarin, duk da haka tana ba a bayar da iota guda takaddara ba tallafawa wannan. A karshe, ita da kanta ta gabatar da sanarwa a bainar jama'a (a kasa) gaba daya ya sabawa bayanan karya na baya game da motsi.

Kiran ta Alex Rhodes mai saɗaɗo shine dalili ɗaya da yasa yake ƙarar ta don ɓata suna: NoFap kafa Alexander Rhodes karar ɓatanci game da Nicole Prause / Liberos LLC.

Amma ni, Prause ya sanya ɗaruruwan maganganu da tweets ƙarya da'awar cewa na zazzage ta da jiki (a taƙaice a sashin farko na shafi # 1). (Ina zaune a wata jihar, mil mil mil nesa kuma ban kasance mai tsinkaye ba.) Kamar yadda aka saba, Fuskantar ba ta da wata hujja don tallafawa wannan ƙarya. Wanene yake buƙatar shaida lokacin da zaku iya yin karya a cikin rantsuwa, kamar yadda ta yi a ciki shigar da kara a kotu a karar neman bata sunan Hilton da ita? A cikin watan Agusta, 2019 da aka rubuta, Prause ta yi iƙirarin ƙaura a ranar 1 ga Yuli, 2019 “saboda tsoron tursasawar Wilson” (lura da ranar):

A daidai wannan watan Agusta, shigar da kotu a shekarar 2019, David Ley maimaita maganar banza a cikin rantsuwar rantsuwa (bayanin kula - “lokuta da yawa”):

a nata bai yi nasara ba a wani umarni na hanawa mara izgili, Yi amfani da karyar da aka faɗi cewa "sakamakon ayyukan Gary Wilson, na sake komawa wurare da yawa".

Kamar yadda yake tare da shigar da kara a kotun Hilton, rubutun Prause don umarnin hanawa ba shi da wata shaidar cewa ta taɓa yin matsuguni, balle ta motsa saboda ni. Zai zama mai sauqi don samar da rasit ko haya, duk da haka Fasahar ta kasa yin hakan. Ba mamaki, kamar yadda ba ta taba bayar da kwararan hujjoji don tallafa wa iƙirarinta ba. Ba mamaki alƙalin ya yanke hukuncin “ba za a yarda da shi ba” yawancin sanarwarta don nuna goyon baya ga buƙatunta na hana umarnin.

A karshe ta bayyana gaskiya a cikin ta Agusta, 2020 neman fatarar fatara. Ta shigar da ita ne don gudun abin alhaki don 3 har yanzu ba a gwada kokarin bata sunan ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc), kuma guji biyan ni bashin lauyan-bashin da ta jawo (Fuskantar ba ta cika wahala ba, kamar yadda ta ba da rahoton $ 270,000 a ajiyar kuɗi). Wannan hoton na fatararta tayi ya nuna Prause bai motsa a cikin shekaru 3 na ƙarshe ba:

Me yasa Karshe ta bayyana gaskiya a cikin fatararta da tayi wanda a da, a zahiri, bata matsar da gidanta ko kasuwancin ta saboda tsangwama? Da kyau, a cikin takaddar dole ne ta samar da kowane irin ingantaccen takardun kuɗi da na sirri ga kotun fatarar kuɗi. Idan tatsuniyarta ta motsi koyaushe bai dace da takaddun nata ba, ana iya tuhumar ta da shaidar zur. Sabanin haka, babu wani tsarin da aka yi don bincika-Tabbatar da Shari'a a cikin karar Hilton ko a rigar adawa ta SLAPP, don haka ta sami damar yin kwance ba tare da hukunci ba.

Satumba, 2020: Don kaucewa take hakkin kasuwanci "Da gaske har yanzu kwakwalwarka a kan batsa" ta canza suna zuwa "Anti-Brain On Porn." Yi aiki a hukumance yana gudanar da asusun mai sa ido (ɓatanci da tsananta ni da iyalina, amma faɗin komi game da YBOP).

Bayan samun alamun kasuwanci na USPTO don YBOP da YourBrainOnPorn mun sanar da twitter cewa @BrainOnPorn ya tsunduma cikin keta dokar kasuwanci. @BrainOnPorn ya amsa da tweets da yawa masu ikirarin cin zarafi, yayin da suka canza sunanta a kokarin bin doka. Misali:

Ba da da ewa bayan, BrainOnPorn (Faɗakar da asusun Twitter na alter-ego) yayi ƙoƙari ya sake ba da sanarwar kansa kan asusun YBOP, amma ba tare da yin tsokaci game da abubuwan YBOP ba! Madadin haka, Yi amfani da amfani da Anti-Brain On Porn (BrainOnPorn) kawai don bata suna da karya game da mutane da kungiyoyi daban-daban (kusan 1,000 irin wadannan tweets a cikin farkon watanni 16 da wanzuwa). Bai kawo ainihin sharhi ko bincike ba.

A layi tare da sabon dalilin sa, @BrainOnPorn bio ya goge "ainihin masana kimiyya" & "ainihin bayanai." RealYBOP shima yana cikin ƙirar sa, yana da'awar ƙarya Na yi barazanar kai kara “mu” har sau 7:

Gaskiyan? Na aika madaidaiciya ɗaya kawai, ingantaccen dakatarwa da dakatar da wasiƙa zuwa Prause da sauran masana RealYBOP (Mayu, 2019). Bayan ayyukan shari'a sun bayyana Daniel Burgess a matsayin sahi na URL na realyourbrainonporn.com, na aika masa da wasikar C&D daban (Yuli, 2019). Duk haruffa ba a kula da su ba / ko ba'a. Bayan na gama mallakin alamun kasuwanci na USPTO (YBOP, yourbrainonporn, yourbrainonporn.com) lauyoyina sun aika Burgess wasikar C&D ta biyu a ranar 2 ga Satumba, 2020 (PDF na wasiƙar C & D). A takaice, kawai na aikawa da Burgess 2 hukuma ta dakatar da wasika, wadanda suka danganci cin zarafin alamar kasuwanci URL realyourbrainonporn.com (wanda Burgess ya mallaka), ba kai tsaye ba ga asusun Twitter mai hade @BrainOnPorn.

Abin sha'awa, 'yan kwanaki bayan wannan C&D na biyu, www.realyourbrainonporn.com ba zato ba tsammani ya ɓace daga yanar gizo. Asusun Twitter na Anti-YBOP (@BrainOnPorn) ya cire hanyar haɗi zuwa shafin da aka yi watsi da shi, ya maye gurbinsa da hanyar haɗi zuwa www.scienceofarousal.com.

Yana da mahimmanci a lura cewa mutumin da ke kula da asusun @BrainOnPorn (Nicole Prause) ya kasance har abada an dakatar da shi daga Twitter saboda musgunawa a cikin Oktoba, 2015 (NicolePrause). Tun daga wannan lokacin, an ba ta izinin ƙirƙirar biyu sababbin asusu wanda ya keta dokokin hana shigowa da shafin Twitter: NicoleRPrause da kuma @BrainOnPorn. Me yasa Twitter bai aiwatar da dokokinta game da wannan mutumin ba?

Bugu da kari, kwanan nan na lashe wani karar anti-SLAPP a kan Nicole Prause, tabbatar da cewa tana damun ni da iyalina. Domin alkali ya yanke hukunci a cikin ni'ima sai alkali ya yanke hukuncin cewa bukatar hana amfani da doka ta Prause ita ce (1) ba tare da tallafi ba kuma (2) haramtaccen yunƙuri na danne haƙƙina na yin magana game da wani al'amari na sha'awar jama'a. Nicole Prause (wacce aka dakatar da asusun ta na dindindin don hargitsi) sannan ta yi amfani da asusun ta na @BrainOnPorn don ta da hankali ni da iyalina (har ma da wasu). Dukanmu muna damuwa game da lafiyarmu.

Kafin ladabtar da Twitter (duba ƙasa), @BrainOnPorn ya dauki nauyin tweets 10-20 a kowacce rana suna bata min suna da kuma tursasa ni, iyalina, abokai da sauran su. A cikin duka, @BrainOnPorn ya buga game da 1, oo0 tweets da aka nufa da ni (yawancin sun bata suna, duk sun kasance ad hominem). Tweets da yawa da yawa don yin rubutu akan wannan shafin. Mafi mahimmanci, Na ƙi yin zanen abokaina, dangi da masu goyan baya ta hanyar ƙarya ta sake buga labaran ƙarya na Prause. Wannan ya ce, Zan ba da 'yan misalai don ba ku ɗanɗanar dabarun ƙyama na Prause.

Kamar yadda aka fada a sama, bayan na gama rajista na alamun kasuwanci na USPTO (YBOP, yourbrainonporn, yourbrainonporn.com) lauyoyina sun aika Burgess wasikar C&D ta biyu a ranar 2 ga Satumba, 2020 (PDF na wasiƙar C & D). Anti-YBOP kwata-kwata ya yi ƙarya game da abubuwan da suka faru, yana da’awar I “na bijire” Burgess da danginsa (waɗanda ke zaune a Utah). Amma duk da haka C & D zuwa Burgess ya shafi gidan yanar gizon RealYBOP, wanda ya cire shi nan da nan, ba asusun Twitter ba. Ba a faɗakar da mai tilasta doka ba. Matata ba ta da wadata kuma ba ta da gado. Mugu:

--------

Yi aiki (@BrainOnPorn) doxing ɗana da mahaifiyarsa (wanda Prause ya ci gaba da yi a ~ 80 tweets na gaba), gami da sunayensu, hotunansu na sirri, adiresoshinsu, wuraren aikinsu, da kuma bayanan kuɗi. Misali, abin kyama Prause ya shafawa ɗana ɗana a matsayin "Wilson's baby momma." Wannan tweet cike yake da karairayi:

Ba ta ma'amala da tukunya ba, amma ta ƙirƙiri kasuwanci mai nasara a cikin kayayyakin CBD na CBD da kayan THC don ciwo mai tsanani, ciwon daji, MS, da kuma wasu yanayi masu yawa (wannan ya kasance doka ta yi shekaru 2 a Oregon) Ta fara kasuwancin ne bayan mun bi ta hanyoyinmu daban. Ban sami kobo daga gare ta ba (me yasa zan iya?). Ko da muna da aure, har yanzu ba zai zama rikici na sha'awa a gare ni in rubuta game da tasirin amfani da batsa ba. Yana da hauka ga Prause don da'awar cewa na ƙirƙiri YBOP don ɓoye gaskiyar cewa tsoho na yana da kasuwancin da ya ci nasara. Amma wannan Nikky ne a gare ku.

---------

Duk karya. Kuna iya fada saboda ba ta ba da hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na na sanya hotuna ba, ko wani abu.

Haruffa 4 da aka bayyana a sama an rubuta su ne don ƙoƙarin yaudarar Prause a wani hanawar da aka jujjuya azaman frivoulus kuma ba tare da cancanta ba, kuma dangane da abin da aka ba ni nasarar SLAPP: Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP.

Marubutan 4 abokai ne na kut da kut da kuma tsara abubuwan da aka tsara. An tallata uku daga cikin huɗu tare da gidan yanar gizon RealYBOP. Babu ɗaya daga cikin marubutan wasiƙar da ya ce na bi su. Haruffan da ba a shafa ba suna dauke da ainihin ainihin sifili don tallafawa da'awarta. Takaitaccen bayani game da haruffa 4 An gabatar da shi kuma anyi kuskuren gabatarwa a cikin tweets dayawa:

Ta memba na RealYBOP Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da ya faɗi game da ni ko Yin wasa.
Daga Rebecca Sullivan ta Kanada. Wasikar mai shafi 2 tana da layin amai guda daya game da ni, tana cewa na kawo takaitaccen bayani kan Motion na Kanada 47. Babu wani abu kuma.
Ta memba na RealYBOP Madita Oeming. Ba ta taɓa da'awar cewa na sa mata ido ko yi mata barazana ta kowace hanya ba. Madadin haka, Oeming yayi kuka saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da tallafi da'awarta. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita karairayin Prause… amma ba tare da wata shaida ba.
Wasikar karshe itace tatsuniya mai cike da karya ta Daniel Burgess, wanda ya mallaki URL na RealYBOP, yayi amfani da laƙabi don yin magana da ni, kuma yana da kansa tsunduma cikin yanayi da yawa na bata suna. Gaskiya game da Burgess da ma'amalar mu shine sosai rubuce a wannan shafin. Ayyukan doka suna ci gaba da Mista Burgess, gami da magance tweets na kwanan nan (duba ƙasa) wanda ya zarge ni da aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa da bin mata 5. Duk maganganun da aka rubuta sau da yawa a Twitter sun zama bata suna ta hanyar, wanda shine mafi sauki irin na bata suna don samun sassauci a cikin kararrakin bata suna.

Wani abin banƙyama na tweet tare da wasiƙun guda ɗaya, wanda lauyanta ya ƙi shigar da shaida dangane da umarnin hana ta na rashin nasara (lauyanta) ya nemi ya janye saboda tana yi masa barazanar kara saboda ba zai yi mata fatawa ba):

Babu ɗaya daga cikin wasiƙar da ta faɗi wani abu game da neman tilasta doka don kowane dalili. Ba ni da “rukuni” - kawai na rubuta littafi ne da ake girmamawa ƙwarai. Ban taba kokarin ganin an kori kowa ba. Yin amfani da maƙaryaci ne. Akwai daruruwan ƙari kamar waɗannan (sau da yawa mafi munin), tare da mutane da yawa yanzu suna kan ɗana, mahaifiyarsa, da matata. Ya munanan da za a sake bugawa a nan.

Kasa - Yi aiki ya daina ɓoyewa a bayan yaudarar cewa @BrainOnPorn Twitter ya kasance wani abu banda asusun batsa na masana'antar batsa, wanda aka kirkira don yaudarar jama'a, kuma don yin magana da ni da duk wani wanda ke magana game da illolin batsa ko abubuwan da ba su dace ba na masana'antar batsa ( kamar masu aikata kananan yara, amfani da wadanda aka yiwa fyade, da fataucin su). Ta kowane ma'auni, Nicole Prause da asusun ta @BrainOnPorn sun keta manufofin Twitter da yawa.

updates:

Sauran - Satumba, 2020: Aaron Minc, JD ya ba da sanarwar ƙarar da ya ɓata sunan Prause (Minc ya mallaki kamfanin lauya mai wakiltar Alex Rhodes).

A Satumba 9, 2020 Aaron Minc, JD aka shigar karar bata suna a kan Melissa Farmer don sake rubutun tweets na ɓatanci wanda Nicole Prause ta wallafa. A cikin sakonnin ta na Twitter, Manomi “kai tsaye da aka aika da / ko aka raba su tare da Kungiyar Lauyoyi ta Jihar Ohio, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, da asusun twitter na Kotun Koli ta Ohio."Manomi yayi da'awar cewa Aaron Minc shine"tsunduma cikin ƙa'idojin da'a waɗanda ke sanya haɗari ga [ɓangare] na uku (Dokokin Ohio na Farfesa na Conabi'ar Dokar 4.4.)."

A cikin shigar da kara a kotu, Minc ya ce zai kara Fada a cikin shari'ar bata sunan Melissa Farmer idan da kuma lokacin da Kotun Fatarar Kuka ta ba shi dama ("saukake daga zama"):

Nicole R. Prause mazaunin California ne. Yi aiki yana aiki da asusu akan Twitter tare da sunan mai amfani "Liberos" da / ko "@NieoleRPrause." Yi gabatar da kara don fatarar kuɗi a ranar 18 ga Agusta, 2020 a ƙarƙashin Fasali na 7 na Dokar Fatarar Kuɗi ta Amurka a Kotun Fatarar Kuɗi ta Amurka na Babban Gundumar California, Shari'a Mai lamba 2: 20-bk-17828-NB. Mai shigar da kara yana cikin shirin neman izini daga Kotun Fatarar Kujera don shigar da ita a matsayin wacce ake kara a wannan kara.

Filin guda biyu da Aaron Minc yayi:

Bari mu fara da tweets na 2 wanda yayi sanadin samunta a uku karar bata suna a kasa da shekaru 2. Tweet na 2 (wanda aka share yanzu), ya ce Aaron Minc (@RepLawyer) ya aika wurin da Prause ke zuwa ga wasu rukunin da ba a ambata sunan su ba wanda ta ce tana shirin kashe ta. Mabiyanta masu ɗoki suna tattara maganganun da ba ta da tallafi (ba ta taɓa ba da hotunan kariyar kwamfuta ba):

Ta sake yin iƙirarin cewa "barazanar" ta tilasta mata komawa mazaunanta da kuma "lab." Wannan bai dace da takaddun fatararta na watan Agusta, 2020 ba inda ta bayyana, a ƙarƙashin hukuncin rantsuwa, cewa ta kasance a wuri ɗaya tsawon shekaru 3 ɗin da suka gabata.

Tatsuniyoyinta na da hankali koyaushe suna motsawa saboda tsananin 'bugu' 'ya farfashe.

Ga wani yanki na asali Yi amfani da zaren kuma wasu daga cikin amsoshin Minc:

Imel ɗin da aka yi amfani da shi ya kasance masu zaman kansu rubutu daga lauyan Alex Rhodes (Andrew Stebbins na Minc Law) zuwa lauyan Prause (Phillip J. Sbrolla):

Wannan imel ɗin ba jama'a ba ne, kuma ba a aika shi zuwa kowane “rukuni” ba. Hankula na yau da kullun dabaru na hotunan kariyar allo wanda bashi da wata alaka da ikirarin ta.

Tare da sycophants ɗinta suna ci gaba, Prause ya bayyana yana cewa tana ƙarar Aaron Minc (ba ita ba):

Ta ci gaba da magana, tana cewa masu binciken LAPD "suna ganin wannan na iya yi." Ka lura da yadda Masu amfani da cikakken saye suke saya cikin labarin ƙarya na Prause.

She contiunes tayi ikirarin cewa "jami'in bincike ne mai kyan gani" da zai iya aiki akan wadannan. Abin da "waɗannan" ba wanda ya sani, kamar yadda ba ta ba da misalai na komai ba, sai dai don imel na sirri na watanni 8 tsakanin lauyoyi.

Idan da ace ina da dala a duk lokacin da Shari'a tayi ikirarin FBI ko LADP suna shirin kame - kuma ba haka bane.

Tweets na tweets ya ba wasu damar bin Aaron Minc:

A ƙarshe, Melissa Farmer, wanda ake iya ɗauka ta hanyar wasan kwaikwayon wasan kwaikwayon na Prause, an zuga shi don tweet. Har ma ta yi alama ga ƙungiyoyin lauyoyi daban-daban kuma ta zargi Minc da shiga cikin “keta ka'idodin da ke sanya haɗari ga ɓangare na uku”(An ɗauke shi daga fayil ɗin Minc):

Ba zai taɓa mamakin yadda mutane ba tare da jinkiri ba suke sake faɗar da'awar ba tare da damuwa da bincika gaskiyar ba ko neman goyon bayan shaida.

Da ke ƙasa akwai hotunan allo na shafuka 1 zuwa na 5 na korafin Aaron Minc don bata suna da kuma haske na karya:

Page #1

Page #2

Page #3

Page #4

Page #5

Thisara wannan a cikin dogon jerin Prause na yunƙurin rusa ayyukan: Yawancin waɗanda Aka Ci zarafinsu na Rahoton iciouseta na Nicole Prause da Amfani da Tsari na Tsari.

Satumba, 2020: Anti-YBOP / @ BrainOnPorn (Prause) wanda Twitter ta hore da zagi da cin zarafin ni da wasu

Nicole Prause's @BrainOnPorn asusun da'awar ya zama "sharhi" akan Brain On Porn. Madadin haka, yana biye da ni (da wasu) da kaina, kuma baya yin tsokaci akan Brain On Porn (yanar or littafin). Ba a zahiri bane, "Anti-YourBrainOnPorn," kuma don haka yana amfani da alamun kasuwanci na ba tare da hujja ba don gabatar da matsayin sharhi game da Brain On Porn.

Yayin da yake bayyana a matsayin "sharhi," @BrainOnPorn da gaske yana shiga cikin niyya niyya ni da iyalina (da dangi), da abokai. Dokokin Twitter da bayanai dalla-dalla sun ce masu zuwa:

Zagi / tursasawa: Ba za ku iya shiga cikin musgunawar wani ba, ko kuma zuga wasu mutane suyi hakan. Wannan ya hada da fata ko fatan wani ya sami cutarwa ta jiki. Ya koyi.
Dokokin Twitter: Ba za ku iya shiga cikin musgunawar wani ba, ko kuma zuga wasu mutane suyi hakan. Muna la'akari da halayen zalunci a matsayin ƙoƙari na tursasawa, tsoratarwa, ko rufe muryar wani. …
Muna hana halayyar da ke tursasawa ko tsoratarwa, ko akasin haka da nufin kunyata ko ƙasƙantar da wasu.

Tunda sauya alkibla a yunqurin gujewa keta dokar kasuwanci, @BrainOnPorn tana zagi, cin mutunci, tozartawa da wulakanta ni, matata, ɗana, da mahaifiyar ɗana. Wadannan mutane biyun ba su taɓa yin sharhi game da wani abu da ya shafi batsa ko @BrainOnPorn ba. Isaya yana aiki a fagen fasaha. Ɗayan tana gudanar da kasuwancin da ta haɓaka bayan ita kuma muka rabu, wanda ba ni da sha'awa. Irin wannan tursasawar da aka yi niyya tana lalata dukkanin su biyun da ƙeta. Dukansu suna cikin fargaba don amincin su.

Don aiwatar da wannan mulkin ta'addanci, @BrainOnPorn yana sanya hotuna marasa izini, takardu, da sauran “shaidu” da aka ƙirƙira, sannan kuma ya zama mai nuna ɓarna ko ƙarya game da waɗannan abubuwan da mutanen da aka ambata. @BrainOnPorn kuma yana sanya wulakanci, zargin karya da nufin musgunawa da wulakanta shi. Na ba da rahoto da yawa na cin mutunci da m tweets, A ƙarshe. Twitter daga ƙarshe ya ba da amsa ta hanyar hana Anti-YBOP na kwana ɗaya da tabbatarwa ta hanyar sanarwa cewa Fuskanci ya keta dokokin twitter game da cin zarafi da hargitsi

Haramcin rana guda:

Twitter ta tabbatar da cewa Anti-YBOP ta keta dokokin twitter don cin zarafi da tursasawa:

Asusun mai amfani da sunan Prause ba komai bane face asusun sa ido.

updates:

Ana ci gaba: Yin amfani da amfani da @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don musgunawa da ɓata sunan Laila Mickelwait bayan ta fara Yakin TraffickingHub don ɗaukar Pornhub alhakin ɗaukar nauyin batsa na yara da bidiyo na mata safarar mata (sama da tweets 100). Yi amfani da ƙarya don zargin Laila na tallafawa ko aika barazanar mutuwa, da sauran ayyukan haram.

Laila Mickelwait ta kasance manufa ta yau da kullun ta Prause da kuma mai kiran batsa mai suna @BrainOnPorn. (Laila kawota wani rantsuwa a cikin ɓatanci ya dace da Amfani.) A zahiri, RealYBOP Twitter (Prause) sun kai hari ga Laila Mickelwait don kare kallon batsa na Pornhub da shekarun rashin shekaru da rashin tabbatar da shekaru.

Mickelwait's takarda kai don riƙe PornHub da lissafi na abubuwan da ba a iya canzawa ba kuma ba bisa doka ba sanyawa a shafinta ya samu sa hannu sama da miliyan 2, kuma daga karshe ya jagoranci jaridar NY Times wallafa wani labarin bincike wanda ke tabbatar da ikirarin da TraffickingHub & Laila suka gabatar: 'Ya'yan Pornhub - Me yasa Kanada ta ba wannan kamfanin damar cin ribar bidiyon cin zarafi da hari?.

Yaƙin TraffickingHub ya sa @BrainOnPorn ya zama cikakke a kan ayyukan yanar gizo, ƙarairayi da ɓatanci - duk don tallafawa ajandar PornHub. Fewan misalai (na sama da tweets 100) suna ƙasa.

Laila ya rubuta op-ed nuna alama a kamfen ɗin da aka tsara don ɓata mata suna da Fitowa kuka, da kuma musguna mata da ɓata mata suna. Fewan ragowa daga labarinta:

Wannan kamfen din neman yardar da jama'a suka yi shi ne karshen dusar kankara. A shekarar da ta gabata, Mindgeek da masu maye gurbin sa a lokaci guda sun gudanar da mummunan duhu, kamfen na ɓoye don ɓata sunan, musgunawa, da tsoratar da waɗanda suka nemi bayyana gaskiyar…
A wannan lokacin, ni da iyalina ma an yi mana barazana, tursasawa, cin mutunci, da lalata mu ta hanyar ƙungiyar masu aiki, yawancinmu muna iya haɗa kai tsaye zuwa Mindgeek da masu ba da shawara. Kusan dangin dangi sunyi wa imel dinsu, asusun banki, da kuma ajiyar girgije. Anyi imel da hotunan dangi masu zaman kansu don nuna musu tsoro da tsoratar dasu da kuma kaina….

Ba mu san ko @BrainOnPorn ya yi magana da ma'aikatan Mindgeek ba, amma wannan mummunan asusun na Twitter ya zama daya daga cikin manyan cibiyoyin da ke muzgunawa da bata sunan Laila da Fitowar Kuka (kafin a dakatar da asusun a karshen Oktoba, 2020).

Anan, RealYBOP kai tsaye tana tallafawa Mindgeek, mai gidan yanar gizo ta PornHub ta hanyar niyya mai zuwa Taila ta Laila Mickelwait.

Anan RealYBOP ke kai hari ga Laila, yayin da yake kare Shugaba na Mindgeek. Lura: RealYBOP yayi karya yayin tabbatar da asusun ba na Shugaba na Mindgeek bane.

-------

Hare-haren RealYBOP Safarar Mutane, wanda shine kamfen don ɗaukar Pornhub alhakin ɗaukar nauyin batsa da lalata hotunan bidiyo (wanda aka fara Laila Mickelwait).

-------

Anan RealYBOP ya tafi wacko don wulakanta Fitowa Kuka:

RealYBOP ta dunƙule magoya bayan Traffickinghub:

Supportarin tallafi na Pornhub (babu faɗi game da kuɗin da Mindgeek ke karɓa daga amfani da wasu):

Saukar da zaren magoya bayan Traffickinghub, sanya kudin EC, kamar dai kasafin kudin yana da alaqa da Pornhub.

RealYBOP ta wallafa a shafin ta na Twitter cewa Laila bata halarci USC ba. Merritt ta kira RealYBOP don karyar ta:

RealYBOP yana sanya bayanan kuɗi, ƙarya yana nuna wani abu mai inuwa yana faruwa. RealYBOP ta ce korafin 'yan safarar ba ya yin komai. Yaya ba daidai ba RealYBOP ta kasance: https://traffickinghub.com/

Merritt posts zanga-zangar adawa da Pornhub kuma RealYBOP ta kai harin:

RealYBOP ya tsunduma cikin bata suna da se, furtawa cikin k'arya Laila tana neman maza suyi mata barazana da mata. Screenshots din guda 4 ba su ce komai ba game da wanda aka tursasa, balle a ce Laila ta fada ma ta.

Arin ɓata suna, da'awar ƙarya Laila ta razana mata mata da yawa. Hotunan kariyar suna na bayanan yanar gizo da ba a san su ba. Babu abin da ya shafi Laila.

RealYBOP yana da kyau sosai, tare da lokuta da yawa na ɓata suna da se:

RealYBOP ya ce korafin ba zai yi komai ba, amma duk da haka ya sa Pornhub ya goge sama da rabin bidiyonsa, ya sanya sabbin ka'idoji, kuma ya sa 'yan majalisar suka fara gabatar da kudiri da bincike. Me ya faru da RealYBOP? An cire gidan yanar gizon ne saboda keta dokar kasuwanci, yayin da aka dakatar da asusun Twitter na har abada don musgunawa!

Erarin maganganun mahaukaci. Ba abin mamaki ba ne da jam'iyyun da yawa ke tuhumar Prause.

RealYBOP yana ci gaba da yin fa'idar Pornhub:

M cyberstalking ya ci gaba:

Bayan tweets 10 a ranar 30 ga Satumba Satumba akan Laila da yakinta Traffickinghub, RealYBOP ya sake farawa a ranar 1 ga Oktoba tare da ƙarin ƙaryar:

Defarin ɓata suna da se:

Liesarin ƙaryar ta RealYBOP. A cikin tweet RealYBOP ya danganta da WIPO, wanda ya kasance game da keta alamar kasuwanci ta YBOP. Hasken labarai - WIPO ba matsala kamar yadda Wilson yanzu ya mallaki URL ɗin don RealYBOP: Hankali: YBOP ya sami www.RealYourBrainOnPorn.com a cikin yarjejeniyar cin amanar kasuwanci.

Haukakar RealYBOP ta ci gaba:

Hakanan, ƙarin ƙaryar. Screenshots ba su da alaƙa da kowa, kawai maganganun intanet bazuwar.

Ba abin mamaki ba ne da ake gabatar da kara don ɓata suna:

Liesarin ƙaryar da yin amfani da yanar gizo: Laila ba ta tara kuɗi don sauran ƙungiyoyi ba. (An gabatar da kararraki don lalata NoFap.)

LOL - Yanzu RealYBOP yana faɗar ƙarya cewa Gary Wilson ya yi ƙarya. Abin ban dariya yadda hotunan hotunan ta ba su da misalai, duk da haka wannan rukunin yanar gizon yana ba da misalai da yawa na Yin amfani da lalata kanta: Nicole Prause & David Ley sun yi ƙarya a shari'ar ɓatanci (Satumba, 2019). Hmm… ta yaya RealYBOP ta sami hotunan kariyar FBI na gunaguni na kan layi - wanda babu sunan kowa, har da ni? Oh ee, RealYBOP is Sallah.

YBOP ta hanyar zaren Twitter da ke lalata ƙaryar karya: https://twitter.com/YourBrainOnPorn/status/1313947340554690562

Amsar tana samun nutsuwa:

Prausearin Karya da aka yi wa fallasa a cikin nasarar shari'ar Wilson, inda kotuna suka yanke hukunci cewa shi ba mai tsinkaye ba ne, kuma Prause ita ce mai aikatawa - Oƙarin Prause na tsayar da Wilson; an hana bin umarnin hana ta a matsayin mai wadatarwa kuma tana bin wasu kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin da aka yanke wa SLAPP.

RealYBOP (an shiga cikin "Anti-YBOP," amma har yanzu @BrainOnPorn) yana tambayar wanda aka azabtar da Pornhub, Avri Sapir

Avri Sapir ya ba da amsa ga kyamar kyamar RealYBOP:

RealYBOP ta sake ƙoƙari don tunzura mabiyanta su ba da rahoton Fitowa Cry zuwa jihar Missouri (kamar yadda Prause ta yi shekara guda da ta gabata - Fabrairu, 2019: Yi amfani da ƙarya don zargin Fitowa Cry na zamba. Ya nemi mabiyan Twitter da su kawo rahoton rashin riba ga babban lauyan Missouri (saboda dalilai marasa ma'ana), Ya bayyana don shirya shafin Wikipedia na Shugaba.). Babu wanda ya sani, gami da RealYBOP, wane cin zarafi Fitowa kuka da ake tsammani ya aikata.

Taimakon kai tsaye na PornHub:

A ƙarshe, Gwadawa ba ta ɓoye a bayan asusunta na asusunta ba:

Nan da nan ta koma ga sunan laƙabarta, tana nuna a bayyane: EC na son kawo ƙarshen fataucin mata.

Hitarin fashe-fage da aka ɗora da ƙarya:

Arin yin amfani da yanar gizo don tallafawa Pornhub:

Arin tattaunawar yanar gizo na masu goyon bayan Traffickinghub:

Shigar da zaren magoya bayan Traffickinghub, yana yada labaran karya:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Koyaya, Prause yanzu tana amfani da asusunta na sirri don ci gaba da lalata lalata da lalata sunan Laila - da goyon bayanta na Pornhub. A cikin yawancin RealYBOP kuma yanzu Yi amfani da tweets, ta bayyana a fili ko tana ambaton ni sa adireshinta kan YBOP ko twitter. Karya take yi kuma ba ta taba bayar da wata shaidar cewa hakan ya faru ba. Haka kuma Ba a ba da kyauta ba a cikin shari'o'in 2 da na ci nasara da tabbatar da Prause yana kwance adireshinta yana kan YBOP ko kuma ko'ina (twitter zaren fallasa Yin wasa kamar yadda kwance):

Lokacin da mutane ke bin Pornhub, Fushin shiga cikin zarensu, yana sanya suna.

------

Tana bata sunan Laila lokacin da Laila take bin Pornhub. Laila ba ta rubuta wasiƙa don tallafawa watsa adireshin Prause ba. Babu wanda yayi. Duk BS.

(twitter zaren fallasa Yin wasa kamar yadda kwance game da adireshin da kowa ke sanyawa):

----------

Lalata Laila & tallafawa Pornhub. Ta gabatar da karya a karkashin tweetff ta Kristoff ta danganta ga labarin Laila wanda ke bayanin lalata da abokan kawancen batsah, kamar Prause:

----------

Karyace cewa Laila tana tallafawa tashin hankali (Abin wasa ne - kamar yadda Prause ke tallafawa PornHub!).

--------

Anan Prause tayi karya cewa Laila na da hannu cikin barazanar barazanar mutuwa. Yi amfani da ma karya cewa na sanya adireshinta akan YBOP (twitter zaren fallasa Yin wasa kamar yadda kwance):

-------

Ofari da yawa daga irin waɗannan ƙarya (twitter zaren fallasa Yin wasa kamar yadda kwance):

---------

Karya cewa Laila na da hannu a barazanar barazanar kisa. Me yasa Prause ke damun Kristof, wanda ya fallasa ayyukan batsa da lalata na Pornhub?

Ta yaya abin ƙyama yake cewa Tweets tweets suna kwance ƙarƙashin bidiyo ta wanda aka azabtar da Pornhub?

----------

Cigaba da yin magana ta hanyar yanar gizo da karya. Laila ba ta taɓa cewa an biya Prause ta batsa ba.

Lura da yadda Furuci ke ɓata sunan Laila a cikin zaren inda ake caccakar Pornhub. Shin wannan hanyarta ce ta tallafawa Pornhub?

---------

Arin wauta a cikin wani zaren inda ake sukar Pornhub.

------

Tare da ita @BrainOnPorn asusun da aka dakatar don musgunawa, Dole ne a yi amfani da asusun nasa don ɓata waɗanda ke sukar batsahub:

--------

Defarin ɓata suna.

------

Yi amfani da sakonnin nata na kansa, ba daidai ba game da ƙauyuka:

Wani:

GASKIYA:

Tabbatarwar tana ƙarƙashin yarjejeniyar bayyanawa, wanda Prause ya bayyana yana keta.
Ba wanda ya ce “manyan kudade, ”Amma kamfanin inshora na Prause a fili ya biya biyan kuɗi zuwa Rhodes da Hilton.
"Janye da son zuciya”Yin sulhu yana nufin mai gabatar da kara (Rhodes, Hilton) ya amince da“ yarjejeniyar ”wanda ake kara, don haka a shirye yake ya yi watsi da karar ta farko. “Tare da nuna wariya” kawai yana nufin cewa mai shigar da kara ba zai sake tuhumar wanda ake kara ba saboda asali da'awar. Mai gabatar da kara yana da 'yanci sake yin kara game da sabbin da'awa, kamar saba ka'idojin yarjejeniyar sulhu.
"Ban biya komai ba.”Wataƙila, amma kamfani inshora na fili ya yi!
"Babu wani binciken cin mutunci da aka taba yi.”Yi amfani da sasantawa kowane karar don kauce wa bin ka'idodi da gwajin juri. Ba a yanke hukunci ba. Haka kuma babu wani "binciken."
A karar cin mutunci ta uku ta ci gaba, kuma na yi nasara a kararraki 2 da aka yi wa Prause, na fallasa ta a matsayin mai aikatawa, ba wanda aka azabtar ba (kwat da wando # 1, kwat da wando # 2).

---------

Bugu da ƙari, tweeting a ƙarƙashin zargi na Pornhub, tare da # damuwa:

-------

Arin ɓata suna, yayin tallafawa kamfen ɗin Pornhub akan Laila.

Babu kungiyoyin Laila Haddad masu yakar batsa.

-------

Abin ƙyama. Gunawa ya ce NCOSE & Laila sun tunzura kashe-kashe a ɗakin taro na Atlanta. Wani bugun EJ Dickson, wanda ke dauke da “gwani ': David Ley

Arin kallon yanar gizo mai cike da damuwa, sanya rubutun Rolling Stone (lura da yadda ake gabatar da sakonni a ƙarƙashin tweets suna lalata Pornhub)

Ofari iri ɗaya, a rana ɗaya:

Kuma ƙari a rana ɗaya. Abin dariya: Laila tana "tsokano tashin hankali ga mata", amma Pornhub yana da kyau (Karanta koyaushe yana da alama shigar da zaren inda ake lalata ko kuma fallasa Pornhub)

----------

Kwana daya. Kai. Shiga XBIZ don shafawa Laila. Masana’antar batsa suna tsoro.

Rana daya, karya daya ce.

Na 9th tweet daga Maris 25th.

A'a, ba a cutar da ita ba a wajen “ofishin da kungiyarta ta sanya”. Kamar yadda aka bayyana, Prause ta kira duk wanda bata son "rukuni". Ba na cikin kowane “rukuni”, amma Nikky yana magana ne game da ni, kuma yana kwance cewa na sanya adireshinta a kan YBOP: Fabrairu, 2021: Yi amfani da sakonnin 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 cikin karyar cewa na sanya adireshinta kan YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a cikin 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a cikin 2020 Prause tweeted cewa babu wani, har da ni, da ke da adireshinta na ainihi. Liesaryata ba ta dace ba (takaddun rubutu fiye da kwanaki 5).

-------

Tana kwance kamar yadda twitter bata bayyana wanda ya bada rahoto ba.

Haka karya. Ba ta san wanda ya ba da rahoton asusunta ba. Amma ya kamata a ba da rahoto, yayin da yake cikin tursasawa, ɓatanci da yin lalata da yanar gizo. Game da maganganun Laila game da mijinta, tana da barazanar barazanar mutuwa koyaushe yayin da ta ɗauki kasuwancin dala biliyan. Duba - Endarshen kamfen din Pornhub na tsoratarwa.

-------

M cyberstalker:

Kwana daya. Yi amfani da yanar gizo ta hanyar magana da wani wanda aka azabtar da Pornhub

Kwana daya. A karkashin rubutun da ke zuwa bayan Pornhub.

Wani kuma a rana guda, tweeting duk inda ake lalata batsah

Bugu da ƙari, duk inda Pornhub ke cikin matsala, tana cikin ceto.

----------

Cyberstalking a tweet disparaging Pornhub. Mamaki.

RE: Bin tweets - Ban taɓa cewa Prause tana kwance game da farmakinta ba (duk da cewa ita maƙaryaciya ce, mai tsegumi a intanet, cyberstalker). Na ce tana kwance game da harin da aka samu a wani adireshin da aka sanya akan YBOP: Fabrairu, 2021: Yi amfani da sakonnin 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 cikin karyar cewa na sanya adireshinta kan YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a cikin 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a cikin 2020 Prause tweeted cewa babu wani, har da ni, da ke da adireshinta na ainihi. Liesaryata ba ta dace ba (takaddun rubutu fiye da kwanaki 5).

Cyberstalking don Pornhub, kuma. Wannan lokacin haɗin gwiwa tare da Daraktan Sadarwa na FSC (@Bbchausa), Mike Stabile.

Ba karo na 1 da tayi aiki tare da FSC ba:

Cyberstalking a tweet disparaging Pornhub. Karyata zargin Laila da yin "korafin barazanar masu laifi"

Gwadawa yana nuna yana magana ne akan dakatarwar ta twitter, inda wani ya ba da rahoto game da barazanar barazanar - Maris, 2021: An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na dan lokaci saboda “aika sakonnin tashin hankali”. Tana kwance, saboda twitter bata taba bayyana wanda yayi rahoton ba. Ba za ta iya taimaka wa kwance ba, ko da kuwa duk sanadin twitter ya sani.

--------

Tallafawa batsahub ta hanyar yanar gizo.

Na ce - Fabrairu, 2021: Yi amfani da sakonnin 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 cikin karyar cewa na sanya adireshinta kan YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a cikin 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a cikin 2020 Prause tweeted cewa babu wani, har da ni, da ke da adireshinta na ainihi. Liesaryata ba ta dace ba (takaddun rubutu fiye da kwanaki 5).

Kwana daya. Haka karya.

Ya haifar da yin amfani da yanar gizo.

Yi amfani da retweets wani cin mutuncin shills.

Na biyu sake aikowa.

--------

Supportarin tallafi ga Mindgeek ta hanyar lalata Laila da Staci Sprout.

Rana guda “tsokano tashin hankali” ta hanyar ƙalubalantar Pornhub. Huh?

-----

Washegari (14 ga Afrilu, 2021). 3 tweets na batanci a jere:

Rana guda - 3 a jere suna lalata Staci Sprout da Laila. Same gaji karya.

Kwana daya. Daga kare Pornhub.

Kwana guda, ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo.

A rana guda, sanya posting VICE a yanki, a sake, duk inda aka ambaci Pornhub.

An yi mata tambaya game da yin amfani da yanar gizo. Ta amsa da hoton hoton 'yan sanda na Afrilu, 2019 ga wani bayani da ba a sani ba da ba ta so.

Rahoton:

Zan kasance a ofishin 'yan sanda idan na gabatar da rahoto game da kowane maganganu ko tsoratar da magana game da ni (da yawa ta yin amfani da kanta).

Tana da dogon tarihi na gabatar da rahotannin 'yan sanda na karya:

Tana da tarihi mai yawa na shigar da rahotanni na karya da sharri - Yawancin Wadanda Aka Nashe Na Rahoton Mai Laifi na Nicole Prause da Amfani da iciousarna.

Kwana daya. Kamar samun nutter.

A rana guda, wani goro mai cike da tweet. Sikanin allo ba shi da komai tare da abin da ake da'awar da'awar. Bugu da ƙari, don tallafawa batsahub:

Kwana daya. Nawa ne wancan?

Kwana daya.

15 ko haka tweets na batanci a cikin kwana guda da nufin Laila - duk don tallafawa ajandar masana'antar batsa.

---------

Washegari (15 ga Afrilu, 2021), aika rubuce rubuce a ƙarƙashin Gabe, wanda ya toshe ta. Yi baƙin ciki cewa Pornhub yana gab da rasa tsabar kuɗi:

Kwana daya. In ji laila tana kokarin kashe pepole. Abin da goro.

Kwana daya. Ba damuwa cewa Pornhub yana gab da rasa tsabar kuɗi

Kwana guda, tallafawa Mindgeek. Lura - Yin wasa yana kwance game da tweet wanda yake magana akan Pornhub, ba ita ba, lokacin da aka ce “Akwai wuri na musamman a jahannama ga ire-iren wadannan mutane da ke cin ganimar raunana da matalauta ”

Yi amfani da hoton da aka sarrafa ta hanyar amfani, tare da tsallake saman tweet, kuma an sanya tweet ɗin da bai dace ba a ƙasawuri na musamman a jahannama".

Ga ainihin tsari na tweets. Yi amfani da aka buga a ƙarƙashin tweet na watanni 9 na Aamir, kuma Na amsa ina fallasa ta a matsayin ƙaryar da yin amfani da yanar gizo:

Wannan shine abin da take yi… koyaushe.

Wannan karon a karkashin Laila, suna neman a binciki Laila.

Dole ne Pornhub ya ƙaunace ta.

---------

Washegari (Afrilu 16, 2021) - Yin aiki tare da XBIZ (Gustavo Turner) don kai hari ga Laila Mickelwait:

-------

Podcast Podcast tare da VICE's Samantha Cole, marubucin bugun. An fallasa Pornhub saboda wahalarwa a cikin lalata yara da fataucin yara. Visa, Mastercard & Discover yanke sarrafa katin. Grant Thornton, Heinz / Unilever & PayPal sun yanke alaƙa. Pornhub ya share 80% na rukunin yanar gizonsa (bidiyo miliyan 10) an shigar da kara 5. An gabatar da shi a gaban majalisar Kanada - kuma duk da haka muna da Nuna tweeting don tallafawa masu zartarwar PornHub!

-------

Cyberstalking Fitowa Kuka a daren Juma'a.

------

Kai. Yana zargin wanzuwar gobara:

---------------------------

A ƙarshe, 2021 Laila Mickelwait ce ta buɗe a Washington Times inda take kwatanta abubuwan banƙyama na Pornhub da masu gudanar da ayyukanta (kamar RealYBOP) - Endarshen kamfen din Pornhub na tsoratarwa.

updates:

Gudana: Yin amfani da amfani BrainOnPorn da kuma @NicoleRPrause don zargin Matt Fradd da yaudara, barazanar tashin hankali na jiki, da tallafawa "barazanar mutuwa" da "bin mata".

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba. Ga wasu bayanan:

YBOP yayi tir da barazanar, munanan kalamai a shafukan sada zumunta, haka ma duk wanda muka sani. Wannan ya ce, intanet ita ce Wild West. Yawancin mutanen da ke cikin jama'a - na kowane jinsi da jinsi - sun gaya mana cewa a kai a kai suna samun tsoffin maganganu daga masu lalata yanar gizo. Handfulananan maganganun da ba a san su ba Yi amfani da da'awar sun ƙaddamar da kodadde a kwatanta.

Ya bayyana cewa tana bin intanet don shaidar cewa ana cutar da ita, har ma da yin amfani da takaddama ta Reddit na musamman don tattara bayanan da ba a san su ba, maganganun da aka kirkira waɗanda masu tsara taron suka riga suka share su da sauri kuma akai-akai. Sannan tana zargin mutane ta yana son ɓata sunan marubuta ko ƙarfafa maganganun - ba tare da wata shaidar shaidar ba.

Yana faɗar cewa ta ɓoye wasu ƙananan misalai na abin da ake zargi da ita. Da alama mutane ba su da isasshen kulawa game da ayyukan Prause don su wahalar da ita.

Yin watsi da alherinta saboda ba safai ake niyya da ita ba, tana yawan yin kara game da abin da take fama da shi ta hanyar amfani da karamin tarinta. Abin damuwa, a cikin watanni biyu da suka gabata ta ɗauka don inganta wannan kamfen. Ta kara da cewa maganganun da ke ban mamaki cewa abubuwan da ke faruwa a kan layi suna da alhakin misalin tabawa maras so (wanda ta bayyana a matsayin "cin zarafin jima'i"). Ta yi zargin cewa mummunan lamarin ya faru a titunan Santa Monica a watan Oktoba na 2019.

Ina shaidar cewa wannan taron yana cikin kowace hanya da alaƙa da abubuwan da ke faruwa akan layi? Daga cikin maganganun kan layi da ta nuna, kalilan ne za a iya daukar su a matsayin barazana. Babu wata hujja da ta nuna ɗayan abubuwan da take da daraja na “barazanar” ga mutanen da ma suke mugun mai alaƙa da mutane da yawa da take zargi a kai a kai a kan Twitter na samarwa, tallafawa, ko inganta barazanar mutuwa. Har ila yau, babu wata hujja kaɗan da za ta tallafa wa iƙirarinta cewa maganganun da ta nuna suna da alaƙa da ƙoƙarin murƙushe mata masana kimiyya. Hakanan babu wata hujja da zata nuna cewa yin tsokaci game da balaguron yana kan hanyarta (barazanar da take tafe).

Yi amfani da tweets na yau da kullun cewa ya gabatar da rahoton 'yan sanda ko FBI game da waɗanda aka ambata a cikin ɓatancin a cikin tweets. Abin dariya, yadda tilasta bin doka ba zai taɓa tuntuɓar ɗayanmu ba.

YBOP ba ya yarda da mugayen labarai, masu barazanar… da kowa. Abin mamaki ne cewa Yin wasa yana samun waɗannan postsan sandunan masu matukar damuwa lokacin da ta sanya da yawa na mugunta, ɓatanci, barazanar barazanar nata.

Yanzu ga yakinta na adawa da Fradd. Wannan abin ƙyama ne mai ban mamaki. RealYBOP tweeting cin mutunci a karkashin matar Matt Fradd na bikin ranar bikin aurensu:

Sau da yawa @BrainOnPorn & @NicoleRPrause sun aika da wasika cike da karairayi wadanda kawayenta masu son kallon batsa suka rubuta (galibi wasu membobin RealYBOP) bisa umarnin Fuskantarwa. Ta yi ƙoƙari ta shigar da waɗannan haruffa 4 a cikin ta umarnin hana yaudara shari'ar, amma alƙali ya ga dama ta hanyar su fanko ne (marubutan-wasiƙai kawai sun sake fasalin abin da Prause ya gaya musu - waɗanda ƙarya ce, ba tare da wata alamar shaidar tallafi ba).

Duk da haka, waɗannan haruffan 4, waɗanda ta yi tweeting sau da yawa, ba su faɗi abin da da'awar da'awar suka faɗa ba. Babu ɗaya daga cikin marubutan wasiƙar da ya ce na bi su. Haruffa da ba a san su ba suna ƙunshe da ainihin hujja don tallafawa da'awar da ake yi wa Prause. Takaitaccen bayyani game da haruffa 4 An gabatar da shi kuma an gabatar dashi a cikin tweets dayawa:

Daga Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da ya faɗi game da ni ko Yin wasa.
Daga Rebecca Sullivan ta Kanada. Wasikar mai shafi 2 tana da layin amai guda daya game da ni, tana cewa na kawo takaitaccen bayani kan Motion na Kanada 47. Babu wani abu kuma.
Daga Madita Oeming ta Jamus. Ba ta taɓa da'awar cewa na sa mata ido ko yi mata barazana ta kowace hanya ba. Madadin haka, Oeming mai sihiri-fata ya yi fari saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da maganganun da ba ta tallafi ba, kuma ya sake wallafawa Gabe Deem ya rushe labarinta na Fabrairu, 2020. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita rashin gaskiyar Prause amma ba tare da wata shaidar goyan baya ba.
Wasikar karshe itace tatsuniya mai cike da karya ta Daniel Burgess, wanda ya mallaki RealYBOP, ya yi amfani da laƙabi don yin magana da ni ta yanar gizo, kuma yana da kansa a lokuta da yawa na ɓata suna. Gaskiya game da Burgess da ma'amalar mu sosai rubuce a wannan shafin. Ayyukan shari'a sun ci gaba tare da Mista Burgess, gami da magance sabbin sakonni na tweets (duba ƙasa) waɗanda suka zarge ni da laifin aika barazanar mutuwa da bin mata 5. (Sabuntawa, Janairu, 2021: Gary Wilson yanzu yana da URL na RealYBOP).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Babu wani wuri da za a yi amfani da sakonnin tweets na ɓatanci a cikin zaren da aka ambata Fradd. Duk da cewa Gabe Deem ta toshe ta amma ta shiga zaren sa tare da yawan bata sunan ta na “barazanar mutuwa” zargin.

Abubuwan da aka yi amfani da su sun shafi magana na minti 6 da ke neman wasu su goyi bayan karar da Alex Rhodes ya yi game da Prause. Ga abin da ta bata suna:

Matt a zahiri bai taɓa ambata ta da suna ba.
Matt ya ambaci wani “m mutum” (ba “m mace").
Matt bai taba cewa "An yi amfani da Prause a cikin masana'antar batsa ba."
Matt bai ce “fitar da ita” ba. Maimakon haka, ya ce, “Ba zan yi mamaki ba idan muka ga masana'antar batsa sun fara lalacewa ta wata hanya mai mahimmanci, saboda wanene wannan mutumin,”Wanda har yanzu bai fita daga mahallin ba.
Babu wata shaidar shaidar sifiri da ke haɗa roƙon Fradd don tallafawa Rhodes tare da kowane daga cikin maganganun Prause / RealYBOP a kai a kai a matsayin tweet kamar “barazanar mutuwa.”

---------

Trolling wani zaren, sai ta zargi Fradd da barazanar barazanar. Babu hujja, kawai hoto ne na maganganun da ba a sani ba waɗanda aka tattara tsawon shekaru.

--------

Ofari iri ɗaya. Babu abin da za a yi da masana'antar batsa? Bayyana shaidar akan wannan shafin: Shin Nicole Farko ya shawo kan masana'antar Porn?

--------

Troll wani zaren (ana kiranta abu mai ban mamaki):

Matt bai taba cewa komai game da “rufe mata baki ba.”

--------

An fara farawa a rana mai zuwa tare da ƙarin ƙaryar. Yi amfani da karyar ya faɗi cewa Fradd ya ce “su shura my jaki. "

A zahiri, Matt ya gaya wa Alex ya “Shura jaki.” Hankula Hankula masu motsa jiki. Yi ƙarya game da abin da wani ya faɗa, da fatan masu ba da labarinku sun kasa kallon hotunan kariyar kwamfuta. Ga hotunan hoto:

Tana iya shafawa Fradd rai saboda ya ba da $ 1,000 kuma ya nemi mabiyansa su ba da abin da za su iya.

-------

Kai, ta tursasa sakon Fradd game da ƙaramin ɗansa!

Tsayawa? Na san ta yi ƙarya tsawon shekaru game da ni na bi ta (kuma kotu ta yarda). Ta kuma yayi ƙarya game da samun matsawa koyaushe saboda tsanantawa. Ta kuma zargi mutane da yawa da na sani da yin lalata da ita da / ko mata masana kimiyya.

Ya kamata a lura da cewa 'yar jaridar nan ta Kanada mai binciken Diana Davison wacce ta yi rubutun Millennika na Post bijirar da 'akan Dr. Prause, yayi magana da ita a rikodin kusan mako guda. A cikin maganganun jama'a a ƙarƙashin bidiyo mai alaƙa Davison yayi sharhi, "Prause ya faɗi abubuwa da yawa a gare ni amma babu ɗaya daga cikin “shaidar” da ta goyi bayan da'awar ta. A cikin kowane misali shaidun sun juye wanda wanene mai zalunci. Tana zargin wasu da ainihin abubuwan da ita kanta ta aikata. Na yi imel tare da ita, a rikodin, kusan mako guda. ” A cikin sharhi na biyu Davison ya ce, "Lokacin da na ce na yi makonni biyu ina bincike kan wannan yana nufin na karanta kowane takaddar kotu da kowane takaddun da ke da alaƙa kuma na yi mako guda tare da yin imel tare da Prause kanta wacce ta yanke ni bayan na fara neman ainihin shaidar tsangwama."

Kwana biyu daga baya tallan tallan Fradd ya ci gaba. A wannan karon suna zargin Fradd da barazanar barazanar tashin hankali kai tsaye.

------

Arin yin amfani da yanar gizo da yaudara.

Kudaden ba "sun tafi" ba. Kowane dala da aka tashi ya biya kuɗin doka a ciki Laifin lalata sunan Alex Rhodes. Babu abin da za a yi da masana'antar batsa? Bayyana shaidar akan wannan shafin: Shin Nicole Farko ya shawo kan masana'antar Porn?

Ta ci gaba:

-------

Zargin Fradd na aikata zamba.

Jima'i yana kwance cewa "babu abin da ya faru". Ta shigar da fatarar kuɗi don tsere wa abin alhaki na 3 har yanzu ba a gwada shari'ar bata suna ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc) kuma guji biyan ni bashin lauyan-bashin da ta ciwo (a nasarar da na samu na Anti-SLAPP). Yi hankali, Gwadawa ba ta da iyaka. Ta kawai watsar da yawancin kadarorin ta cikin asusun ritayar ta (sama da rubu'in dala miliyan), kuma ta jera wani ɗan ƙaramin bashin mabukaci (ƙasa da $ 3,000). Iƙirarinta na rashin kuɗi kusan ya dogara ne akan m abubuwan alhaki daga halayen ɓata suna (wanda wataƙila ba a taɓa zuwa kotu ba), da wasu $ 40K da zata bashi da zarar alkali ya albarkaci adadin. Daga nan alkalin Fatarar ya ba da umarnin duk kararrakin bata suna 3 don kokarin sasantawa. Yi aiki & kamfanin inshorarta sun zauna tare da Don Hilton da Alex Rhodes. Ba a bayyana sharuɗɗan ba, amma kamfanin inshorar ya ba da manyan kuɗaɗe don sasantawa har zuwa sasantawar. Ina tsammanin Prause dole ne ta sanya hannu kan wata magana mara yankewa, wanda ba ta kiyaye ba.

-------

Ta fara a washegari. Yanzu tana ikirarin cewa Matt ya iza rikici. Amma duk da haka ba ta taɓa bayar da wata hujja game da tashin hankali ba, amma ita kaɗai Matt.

Faɗin "kuɗin sun tafi" daidai ne - duk kuɗin da aka bayar sun shiga cikin ƙarar. Gudummawar sun kasa ɗaukar nauyin duk abin da Alex ya kashe na shari'a.

------

Ƙari na wannan.

"Ta tafi"? Gudummawar sun kasa ɗaukar nauyin duk abin da Alex ya kashe na shari'a.

--------

Arin ɓata suna, zargin ƙarya Fradd da tunzura rikici.

-----

Karya yake cewa Fradd ya iza rikici.

Kudin sun biya kuɗin doka. Kamfanin inshora na Prause ya biya kuɗin shari'arta da kuma biyan kuɗin ga Alex.

----

5 tweets a wannan rana suna ɓata sunan Matt, kuma suna ƙarya game da kararraki.

Tweet #2

Sanya # 3. Matt yanzu yana zuga kisan kai!

Tweet # 4: Shin tana zargin Matt game da harbi a ɗakin tausa na Atlanta? Abin da goro.

Tweet # 5: Kulawa? An yi amfani da ladabi a cikin wurare da yawa na shari'a da ƙararraki: Cin nasarar doka akan mai cin mutunci / ɓatanci Nicole Prause: Ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka azabtar ba!

------

Screenshot na gudummawar guda. Ya bata sunan Fradd ta hanyar zarginsa da yiwa mata barazana.

-------

Ofarin maganganun ƙarya ɗaya. Abin da mai amfani da yanar gizo.

---------

5 ga Mayu, 20201 - ci gaba da magana da yanar gizo. A bayyane yake Josh Duggar yayi amfani da software na Idanun Alkawari kuma Fradd yana ɗaya daga cikin masu magana da Yarjejeniyar ido. Yana ba ta uzuri don ɓata sunan Fradd.

Wani.

Wani kuma. Da yake ƙarya cewa Fradd ya ɗaga $ 197K don karar Alex Rhodes.

Wani, tabbas.

Bayan kwana biyu. Fradd bai taba matsawa mabiyansa su kai farmaki Yin amfani da shi ba.

---------

A kan Maris 26, 2020 An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na dan lokaci saboda tursasawa da aka yi da kuma "sanya barazanar mai karfi"

Sauran - Aiki: BrainOnPorn (Yi aiki) ya zargi Gail Dines da "kasancewa a cikin rukuni" wanda ke aika barazanar mutuwa, ya sa mata masana kimiyya, kuma ya kalli mata a matsayin waɗanda ake kashewa & suka cancanci tashin hankali.

Wannan dole ne ya yi rajista a matsayin ɗayan ƙarairayi masu ban dariya na Prause. Amfani da ita Asusun @BrainOnPorn, Fuskantarwa ta haɓaka hare-harenta game da mata masu adawa da batsa Gail Dines PhD. (Don al'amuran da suka gabata na ɓata mata suna da ɓatanci ga Dines duba wannan sashin - Afrilu, 2017: Yi wa labaran farfesa Professor Gail Dines, PhD, watakila don shiga cikin "Op-ed: Wane ne yake karya tsarin kimiyya kan batsa?").

Kafin mu kai ga lalacewa, bincika wannan mummunan tweet inda BrainOnPorn kai hari Dines don sukar "batsa na ruwa." Tweet na RealYBOP ba shi da alaƙa da bayanin Dine, amma RealYBOP ya shafi tallafawa masana'antar batsa.

Daya daga cikin daruruwan @BrainOnPorn tweets don tallafawa ajanda na masana'antar batsa.

--------

@BrainOnPorn wuraren shakatawa na gaba don ɓata suna, suna faɗar ƙarya cewa "ƙungiyar" Dines tana aika barazanar barazanar da zawarcin mata masana kimiyya waɗanda ke nazarin batsa

Shaidar BrainOnPorn? Screenshots na biyu daga haruffa huɗu Yi amfani da ba daidai ba a cikin tweets da yawa:

Na farko da Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da aka faɗi game da fatattakar '' rukunin '' Gail Dines ko Dines.
Na biyu kuma Madita Oeming ta Jamus. Babu abin da aka faɗi game da fatattakar '' rukunin '' Gail Dines ko Dines. Madadin haka, Oeming mai sihiri-fatar jiki ya yi kuka game da ni saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da maganganun da ba ta tallafi ba, kuma ya sake wallafawa Gabe Deem ya rushe labarinta na Fabrairu, 2020. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita abubuwan da ba gaskiya ba na Prause… amma ba tare da wata shaidar goyan baya ba (babu wani).

---------

Bayan 'yan kwanaki @BrainOnPorn ta ci gaba da bata mata suna, tana fadin karyar cewa Dines, kuma mai matukar son mata, suna tallafawa barazanar kashe mata masana kimiyya (!). @BrainOnPorn bai bayar da wata hujja ba don tallafawa da'awar ta wauta. Madadin haka @BrainOnPorn ya sanya jerin sunayen mutanen da aka ambata sau da yawa a cikin labaran kwanan nan game da batsa. Marubucin wannan jerin baya nufin waɗanda aka lissafa a matsayin masanan ilimin karya, ko wani abu.

-------

Ci gaba da bata suna, yana mai bayyana cewa Gail Dines na da hannu a cikin "kokarin da ke barazanar kashe mata masana kimiyya." Hakanan hotunan kariyar kwamfuta marasa mahimmanci.

----------

Hakanan hotunan kariyar hoto guda biyu basu da mahimmanci, tare da maganganun rainin hankali 2 daga intanet. Me yasa Dines, ko wani, zai buƙaci la'antar maganganun bazuwar ta hanyar yanar gizo?

Abin ƙyama.

------

Karya zargin Fradd da yiwa mata barazana.

updates:

Sauran - Aiki: @BrainOnPorn (Prause) ya zargi Liz Walker da ƙarfafan barazanar mutuwa akan mata, tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, kasancewa mai ƙiyayya da LGBTQ, da maƙarƙashiya.

Liz Walker ɗan Australiya ne mai gwagwarmayar yaƙi da batsa kuma mace mai kirkirar shirye-shiryen ilimi ga matasa kuma yayi aiki tare da Gail Dines. @BrainOnPorn (Fada) sau da yawa ana bata sunan Liz da wulakanta shi saboda tana goyon bayan yakin TraffickingHub kuma bata da ra'ayin batsa.

Ta fara da @BrainOnPorn tana cewa Liz Walker, Gabe Deem, Lalia Mickelwait da ni duk masu tashin hankali ne. Ba da hujja, ba shakka.

-------

Ga wani tweet cike da karya. Babu Liz ko Don Hilton da ke adawa da LGBT (Hilton ne tuhume tuhume da cin mutunci). “Shaida” ta BrainOnPorn shine hoton Liz tweeting wannan karatun ilimi na adabin: Yin jima'i a matsayin cututtuka: Shaida don Bincike, Fahimtacce, da Amsawa ga Masu Musanta (Phillips et al., 2015).

Sauran hotunan kariyar allo na maganganun da ba a san su ba ta hanyar intanet, ba Liz Walker ba. Hakanan maganganun ƙarya ɗaya Yi amfani da tweets koyaushe.

-------

Liesarya da yawa a cikin tweet guda: WHO [Hukumar Lafiya ta Duniya] ba ta taɓa tambayar Liz Walker ko wani ya yi wani abu ba; Liz ba ta ƙarfafa barazanar mutuwa; kuma ba a dauki hayar tsaro don kare kowa daga Hilton, Walker ko wani wanda wanda ake zargi Prause da ƙarya ba.

Kamar yadda ya saba, hotunan kariyar kwamfuta suna daga 2 na 4 iri ɗaya cike da haruffa cike da ƙarairayi kararrakin da ta bata min. Haruffa 4:

Ta memba na RealYBOP Kate Dawson ta Ireland. Babu abin da ya ce game da ni.
Daga Rebecca Sullivan ta Kanada. Wasikar mai shafi 2 tana da layin amai guda daya game da ni, tana cewa na kawo takaitaccen bayani kan Motion na Kanada 47. Babu wani abu kuma.
Ta memba na RealYBOP Madita Oeming. Ba ta taɓa da'awar cewa na sa mata ido ko yi mata barazana ta kowace hanya ba. Madadin haka, Oeming yayi kuka saboda na sanya tHoto 3 na tweets game da tallafi da'awarta. Wasikar Oeming ta maimaita karairayin Prause… amma ba tare da wata shaida ba.
Wasikar karshe itace tatsuniya mai cike da karya ta Daniel Burgess, wanda ya mallaki URL na RealYBOP, yayi amfani da laƙabi don yin magana da ni, kuma yana da kansa tsunduma cikin yanayi da yawa na maganganun batanci. Gaskiya game da Burgess da ma'amalar mu shine sosai rubuce a wannan shafin.

--------

Ofarin maƙaryata ɗaya ta hanyar cyberstalker. Kira Liz Walker da 'hatemonger'.

--------

Liesarya suna ci gaba:

-------

Sanya irin maganganun da ba a sani ba, sannan a yiwa yawancinmu alama, suna cewa dole ne mu la'anci maganganun da bamu taɓa gani ba. (Ta yaya za mu iya? @BrainOnPorn ya katange mu duka don haka za ta iya yin amfani da zaren mu na Twitter ba tare da sanin mu ba.) Yin amfani da ladabi ya kasa ambaci duk barazanar da maganganun ƙiyayya / ƙarya da muke karɓa a kowace rana - wanda @BrainOnPorn da Prause suna da tukuna la'ana. Me yasa baku yi haka ba Dr.

A cikin kai-da-kai, @BrainOnPorn ya gabatar da ra'ayoyi 3 a ƙarƙashin lalata labarin SCRAM News wanda Prause yayi ƙarya. Wadancan karairayin sun sa an gurfanar da SCRAM, an jawo labarin, kuma SCRAM na fita daga kasuwanci! Kamfanin Media ScramNews ya tilasta ya nemi gafara & ya biya diyya mai yawa don buga karyar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes & NoFap

------

Bugu da ƙari, @BrainOnPorn posts game da labarin cin mutuncin SCRAM News, a cikin abin da karairayinta suka yi sanadiyar mutuwar SCRAM kuma neman gafara ga Alex Rhodes. Liz Walker bai taba magana da ScramNews ba kuma ba a ambata shi a cikin labarin ba.

Liz Walker yi samar da gajeren shafi game da cin zarafin da cin mutuncin BrainOnPorn: Gaskiya Brainka a kan zargin ƙarya na batsa. Guess Prause ba zai iya jurewa da kasancewar mutumin da yake da gaskiya ba.

updates:

Sauran - Gudana: Gudanar da amfani @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya mai ilimin kwantar da hankali DJ Burr na "kasancewa cikin rukuni" wanda ke aika barazanar mutuwa, yana haifar da tashin hankali, yana hana mata samun kariya, da sauransu.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce na yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba. Yi amfani da tweets na yau da kullun cewa ya gabatar da rahoton 'yan sanda ko FBI game da waɗanda aka ambata a cikin ɓatancin a cikin tweets. Abin dariya, yadda tilasta bin doka ba zai taɓa tuntuɓar ɗayanmu ba.

Amincewa yana da tarihin ɓatanci, tursasawa da yin magana ta hanyar yanar gizo DJ Burr tare da tweets na ɓatanci. Misali, a cikin 2019: Yi wa barazanar tsoratar da mai cutar Burr don ta tsaya a gabanta, sannan ta kai ƙarar rahotonsa ga Ma'aikatar Lafiya ta Washington. An kori rahoton ba bisa ƙa'ida ba, amma ya haifar da damuwa mai yawa.

Burr ya bada a rantsuwar rantsuwa da karar bata sunan Alex Rhodes a kan Prause, wanda ya haifar da yin amfani da ladabi don haɓaka tsangwama da ɓata suna (duk da haka wani misali na Fuskantar shiga cikin tsoratar da shaida). A cikin ɗayan mafi munin ayyukanta, Prause (BrainOnPorn) ta faɗi a rubuce cewa yunƙurin Burr na tallafawa ɗan'uwansa ɗan shekara 14, wanda a matsayinsa na ɗan saurayi baƙar fata da hukumomi ke zalunta, ya zama zamba (!). Yi amfani (@BrainOnPorn) ya biyo baya Burr ya tara kudi don kaninsa mai shekaru 14 da ke tsare, ya zargi Burr da bin sa, yana cewa ya kamata ya hada kan dan uwansa a kurkuku.

Yi aiki ya ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo kuma ya ɓata sunan Burr ta amfani da @BrainOnPorn. Bayan da aka dakatar da wannan laƙabi na dindindin, sai ta sauya zuwa @NicoleRPrause don yin ƙazantaccen aikinta, ta aika da tweets kusan iri ɗaya da waɗanda suka bayyana a yanzu da aka lalata @BrainOnPorn. Ta yi zargin cewa burinta ya kasance a cikin "rukuni" da ke aika barazanar kisa. Tana kwance.

Tweets nata basu da yawa: hotunan kariyar maganganun da ba a san su ba ta hanyar yanar gizo da kuma maganganun 3 da aka ɗauka daga ƙarƙashin labarin lalata SCRAM News wanda Prause yayi ƙarya. Wadancan karairayin sun sa an gurfanar da SCRAM, an jawo labarin, kuma SCRAM na fita daga kasuwanci! Kamfanin Media ScramNews ya tilasta ya nemi gafara & ya biya diyya mai yawa don buga karyar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes & NoFap.

Labarin SCRAM da aka share yanzu yana dauke da bayyananniyar bayani, batanci da aka gabatar ta hanyar amfani da Prause, da kuma babu wata shaidar da zata tabbatar da ikirarin nata. SCRAM yayi hujja mai ban mamaki cewa saboda Fassara ta yi iƙirarin ba ta da wata alaƙa da masana'antar batsa (duk da hotuna da sauran manyan hujjoji akasin haka), Rhodes's Donor Box yaƙin neman kuɗi don shigar da ƙararsa game da Prause yaudara ce. A saman wannan mummunan amfani da alkalami na aikin jarida, ƙungiyar SCRAM ta share maganganu a ƙarƙashin labarin lokacin da masu karatu suka yi ƙoƙari don magance maganganun da ba gaskiya ba na yaudara da yaudarar Prause tare da ainihin hujja. Waɗannan maganganun 3 ne waɗanda ke yin amfani da tweets da ba daidai ba. Duk maganganun 3 suna da gaskiya, gaskiya da bayyana labarin ba a ba da ainihin hujja don tallafawa da'awar Prause ba.

Yayi yawa ga daukar nauyin aikin jarida.

--------

Ta yi wa Burr alama, da kuma wasu da yawa, suna masu cewa duk suna da alhakin “barazanar barazanar” da ba a sani ba (yawancin maganganun da ta nuna ba barazanar ba ce, balle barazanar mutuwa).

--------

@BrainOnPorn ya ambaci sunayen mutane 3 wadanda suka yi tsokaci a karkashin batanci, ba tare da hujja ba, yanzu an share labarin ScramNews.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ƙasa, kodayake na toshe ta, ta yi ta murza zargina tana zargin DJ da kasancewa a cikin "rukuni" da ke da alhakin zargin da aka yi mata.

Shafuka na 2,000 da ake kira "ɓatanci" su ne, a zahiri, 4 manyan Shafuka masu amfani ne. Ahh, baƙin ƙarfe na Prause tweeting cewa na ɓata mata suna a cikin zaren sanarwa Nasarata a cikin sutturar suna (har yanzu tana bin ni bashin kotuna da hukunci).

---------

Yi aiki ya bayyana dalilin da yasa ta buƙaci yin maganganun intanet mara kyau: ƙananan maganganun da ba a san su ba za su kai ƙarar ta idan ta sanya hotunan kariyar ainihin maganganun. Da gaske? Ina shaidar take?

Nope, CSAT sun da'awar labarin ScramNews bai bayar da wata hujja da za ta tabbatar da da'awar ba. Tunda aka gurfanar da ScramNews daga wanzuwa, da alama ba a taɓa ba da ScramNews wata hujja ta hanyar amfani da Prause don tallafawa da'awarta ba.

Bugu da ƙari, tweeting bayanan ScramNews, gami da na Burr. Ta ambace ni, amma tana kwance. Ban zuga komai ba.

-------

Akwai ƙaryar da yawa don fallasa a cikin waɗannan tweets na 2 na gaba. A bayyane, tana dogaro da mabiyanta ne ba tare da karanta hotunan kariyar ba - saboda babu wanda zai goyi bayan da'awar a cikin tweets dinta.

Idan kana son gaskiya, duba takaddun Shafin 2 na Burr, wanda aka shigar a karar Alex Rhodes na batanci - DJ Burr, LHMC rantsuwa.

Karya # 1 ta Yin Amfani: Burr bai zargi Yin amfani da yaren wariyar launin fata ba, ya bayyana cewa ita zargin shi na amfani da kalaman wariyar launin fata. Bayanai guda biyu daga gajeriyar rantsuwar Burr sun bayyana wannan:

Karya # 2 ta hanyar Yin amfani: Ta ce Gabe Deem da Gary Wilson sun zarge ta da yin amfani da kalaman wariyar launin fata. Kamar yadda kake gani Deem's tweet bai faɗi komai ba game da Yin wasa. Madadin haka, Deem ya bayyana dabarun masu yin batsa game da batsa gabaɗaya, waɗanda ke lakafta maza waɗanda suka daina batsa a matsayin masu wariyar launin fata.

Tana amfani da dabarar da ta saba, da ƙaryar da'awar mun ce ta kasance dan kaso na X, Y, ko Z. Duk abin da DJ ya faɗi shi ne cewa ƙiren ƙarya laifi ne. Har ila yau, ta buga bayanan SCRAM (Kamfanin Media ScramNews ya tilasta ya nemi gafara & ya biya diyya mai yawa don buga karyar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes & NoFap).

----

Tana shiga zarenta tana kwance game da rahoton FBI, kuma tana kwance cewa adireshinta yana kan YBOP.

Bayar da FBI da'awar: (1) FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Prause tayi karya game da sanya rahoton FBI akan Gary Wilson, (2) FBI ta tabbatar da cewa Nicole Prause ya yi ƙarya game da bayar da rahoto game da Alexander Rhodes.

Bayar da da'awarta cewa adireshinta ya kasance akan YBOP: https://twitter.com/YourBrainOnPorn/status/1360385094159003648.

--------

WOW. Anan, Burr ya nemi taimako game da damuwar sa kuma mai ba da lasisin masanin halayyar dan adam Yi amfani da yanar gizo ta yi masa magana tare da abubuwan da ta saba na kyama. Shin wannan cin zarafin ka'idar dabi'a ce?

Hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na yau da kullun: zane-zane mai fa'ida game da maganganu, da kuma bayanan da ke karkashin labarin SCRAM.

Ka lura cewa tana cikin bacin rai cewa DJ ta nuna goyon baya ga rufe Pornhub.

--------

Dangane da kasancewarsa mai yin amfani da yanar gizo da batanci, Burr ya buga wannan zane, yana ƙare shi da hanyar haɗi don Amfani da shafi # 1 (bai haɗu da shari'ar ba). Kamar yadda zaku iya, ku ga babu wanda ya ce an yanke hukunci game da lalata (wanda ba da gaske ba ne, kamar yadda ƙararrakin 3 ya dace da ita na farar hula ne, ba mai laifi ba).

Game da kararraki, Staci Sprout ya buga wannan (3-17-21): Yi Amfani da tilasta tilasta sasanta Lauyoyi biyu daga Uku akanta don ɓata suna.

----

Ofari da yawa daga irin waɗannan ƙarya. Dubi hoton hoton sosai; Staci sunaye PornHub, ba Yi wasa ba.

----------

Fiye da irin wannan ɓata suna - yana faɗar ƙarya cewa Burr ya iza rikici.

-----

Wani tweet ina DJ thread:

--------

Sassan masu alaƙa:

Sauran - Gudana: Gudanar da amfani @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya mai ilimin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout na “bada shawara game da kisan mata,” “tallafawa barazanar mutuwa,” “tsokanar tashin hankali,” “barazanar mata,” aika “barazanar mutuwa,” misogyny, da sauransu.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba.

Nicole Prause ta ci gaba da yin lalata da fasahar yanar gizo da kuma bata sunan mai ilimin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout. Sha'anin aikin Prause tare da Sprout ya fara ne a cikin 2018, lokacin da Sprout ya yunƙura don tsayawa don cin zarafin kan layi na Prause. An yi amfani da Prause korafi uku marasa tushe tare da Jihar Washington game da mai ilimin kwantar da hankali Sprout (duk an sallamesu). Hare-haren sun yi karfi bayan da Sprout ya bayyana a cikin bidiyon karbar kudi don karar da Alex Rhodes ya yi game da cin mutuncin da aka yiwa Prause, kuma ya bayar da hujjoji a duka Hilton da kuma Rhodes karar bata suna. Har zuwa lokacin da aka dakatar da shi har abada, An yi amfani da Prause @BrainOnPorn Twitter don yawancin ɓatancin ta. Daga nan sai ta koma @NicolRPrause don yin aikin datti. Misalai da yawa suna cikin waɗannan sassan:

Wannan ɓangaren yana damuwa da kansa tare da yin amfani da labaran da ake aikawa da tweets (galibi a cikin zaren Staci) yana zarginta da aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, tunzura tashin hankali, tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, da makamantansu. Kamar yadda yake tare da sassan da suka gabata, Yin wasa ba ya ba da hujja don tallafawa waɗannan ƙaryar. Yi amfani da tweets na kullun cewa ta shigar da policean sanda ko rahoton FBI akan waɗanda aka ambata a cikin ɓatancin ta a cikin tweets ɗin ta. Abin dariya, yadda tilasta bin doka ba zai taɓa tuntuɓar ɗayanmu ba.

Kamar yadda yake tare da ɗaruruwan wasu tweets ɗin nata, Yi amfani da wasu maganganun da ba a san su ba ta hanyar intanet, yana nufin kowannensu a matsayin "barazanar mutuwa," kuma yana zargin abubuwan da ta saba da su na aikawa ko tallafawa waɗannan "barazanar mutuwa."

A cikin wannan sakon ta zargi Stef Carnes, Linda Hatch da Staci Sprout da tallafawa barazanar mutuwa. Me duka 3 suke da shi iri ɗaya? Sun gabatar da takaddun shaida a cikin karar lalata da Prause!

Takaddama:

Rana daya, irin wannan batanci.

Kwana daya. Wannan lokacin Yi amfani da tweets a cikin mutum na 3. @BrainOnPorn yayi ikirarin cewa imel daga Sprout ne, amma ba haka bane. @BrainOnPorn shima ya ta'allaka ne game da abun cikin imel.

Sake, a ranar 1 ga Oktoba, 2020. Bugu da ƙari, hotunan kariyar ba su dace da tweet ɗin @ BrainOnPorn game da su ba. Laila ta wallafa a Twitter ainihin barazanar mutuwa don neman shiga don gudanar da bincike a cikin Pornhub, kuma Sprout ta nuna damuwa da goyan baya ta tweeted.

Ka tuna cewa PornHub shine farkon asusun da aka sake turawa @ BrainOnPorn's budurwar tweet! Wannan yana ba da cikakkiyar shaida game da haɗin gwiwar tsakanin al'amuran tsakanin RealYBOP da masana'antar batsa (Mindgeek). Duk da yake kusan kowane @BrainOnPorn tweet goyi bayan ajandar masana'antar batsa, Tweets a nan bar shakka game da amincin gaskiya na RealYBOP - kai tsaye yana tallafawa masana'antar batsa - musamman PornHub.

Rana guda, karya ɗaya ce ta BrainOnPorn, maganganun da basu dace ba.

Bayan hotunan kariyar kwamfuta na maganganun da ba a san su ba ta hanyar intanet, Tweets mara kyau na Tweets sau da yawa suna ƙunshe da ra'ayoyin 3 da aka ɗauka daga ƙarƙashin labarin ɓatancin SCRAM News wanda Farin ciki ya yi ƙarya. Wadancan karairayin sun sa an gurfanar da SCRAM, an jawo labarin, kuma SCRAM na fita daga kasuwanci! Kamfanin Media ScramNews ya tilasta ya nemi gafara & ya biya diyya mai yawa don buga karyar Nicole Prause game da Alex Rhodes & NoFap.

Labarin SCRAM da aka share yanzu yana dauke da bayyananniyar bayani, batanci da aka gabatar ta hanyar amfani da Prause, da kuma babu wata shaidar da zata tabbatar da ikirarin nata. SCRAM yayi hujja mai ban mamaki cewa saboda Fassara ta yi iƙirarin ba ta da wata alaƙa da masana'antar batsa (duk da hotuna da sauran manyan hujjoji akasin haka), Rhodes's Donor Box yaƙin neman kuɗi don shigar da ƙararsa game da Prause yaudara ce. A saman wannan mummunan amfani da alkalami na aikin jarida, ƙungiyar SCRAM ta share maganganu a ƙarƙashin labarin lokacin da masu karatu suka yi ƙoƙarin magance maganganun da ba gaskiya ba na yaudara da yaudarar Prause tare da ainihin hujja. Waɗannan maganganun 3 ne waɗanda ke yin amfani da tweets da ba daidai ba. Duk maganganun 3 suna da gaskiya, suna faɗar gaskiya cewa labarin SCRAM bai bayar da ainihin hujja don tallafawa da'awar Prause ba.

Bugu da ƙari, Staci, Jan da DJ sun faɗi daidai cewa labarin ba shi da wata hujja don tallafawa da'awarta.

Fromari daga Oktoba 1, 2020: BrainOnPorn Tweets sharrinta ya ta'allaka ne a ƙarƙashin ɗayan abokan kasuwancin Staci: 1) Ba a kori Sprout daga SASH ba, 2) Sprout bai taɓa faɗin wani abu game da “taba al’aura zuwa batsa ba,” 3) Staci bai taɓa yin ƙarya game da “barazanar mutuwa” ba.

-------

Bayan yan kwanaki kadan. Same fasehoods da hotunan kariyar allo. Yi amfani da fushin kaina Labarai. Tags NASW mai ba da shawarar Sprout ya kamata ta rasa lasisi.

Rana guda, fasehoods iri daya. Wannan lokacin a karkashin sanarwar taron koli don dawo da mata masu lalata da lalata.

Ka lura da kalmomin ban mamaki "don hana mace masanin kimiyya samun tallafi." Don haka, sharhi, a ƙarƙashin maras hujja, labarin SCRAM cike da ƙarya, wanda aka share a cikin fewan awanni kaɗan, ya hana Fuskantar samun tallafi? Nah.

Rana guda, maganganun PT iri ɗaya, ƙarin ƙarya, da yiwa SASH alama. Gaskiya - Sprout bai mallaki “kwafin barazanar mutuwa ba.” Ba kuma wanda ya yarda da share tsokaci.

-------

Qarya iri daya.

-------

Cyberstalking yacigaba gobe, sanya kowane sunan Staci ya bayyana

A rana guda, a ƙarƙashin sanarwar taron koli don mata masu lalata da batsa, inda Sprout ta kasance mai gabatarwa. Haƙiƙa ɓoye ɓarna.

Kwana daya.

--------

Karya iri daya, hotunan kariyar kwamfuta mara ma'ana. Bugu da ƙari, a ƙarƙashin tweet inganta taron koli wanda ke nuna Sprout.

Rana guda, karya iri ɗaya da kuma hotunan allo marasa ma'ana. Bugu da ƙari, a ƙarƙashin tweet inganta taron koli wanda ke nuna Sprout.

--------

Kashegari, ƙarya ɗaya ne da hotunan kariyar da ba ma'ana.

---------

Bugu da ƙari, a ƙarƙashin tweet inganta taron koli wanda ke nuna Sprout.

-------

Kisa? Mahaukaci. Gaskiya sharrin psychopathic.

Watanni 6 ke nan daga baya kuma har yanzu “labarin ƙasa” bai bayyana ba.

------

Sanya bayanan karya a tweet daya. Cyberstalking a cikin zaren Sprout

Kwana daya.

Kwana daya.

A rana guda, ci gaba da yin amfani da yanar gizo. Babu wata hanya don tallafawa ƙaryar Prause.

Rana guda (10/12/20), hotunan allo iri ɗaya.

-------

Da'awar hauka ta Yin amfani.

Sprout bai sani ba, saboda babu wani abin sani.

-------

A ranar 13 ga Oktoba, @BrainOnPorn ya wallafa sakonni 15 a shafin Twitter na bata sunan Sprout. Zamu fara da ɗayan kookiest. Gunawa ya ce Sprout yana ba da shawara don kashe mata. Yana samun mahaukaci tare da kowace rana.

Kwana daya. Amincewa ya tambayi mabiya suyi rahoto game da tara kudin Alex zuwa Pennsylvania.

Duk kuɗin sun tafi kuɗin shari'a. Duba- Yi Amfani da tilasta tilasta sasanta Lauyoyi biyu daga Uku akanta don ɓata suna

Bayanan intanet marasa mahimmanci:

Kwana daya. Ya ce Ya kamata a cire Sprout daga kulawa da haƙuri.

Mutumin da ya yiwa kanta lahani shine Prause. Yawancin lokuta da aka rubuta:

Ya ci gaba:

Yanzu har da Stefanie Carnes. Abin da ake kira "haɗin kai" an rantse da wadata

Kira Sprout mai ban tsoro da Hilton ɗan damun batsa. Sprout ya ce "zai gan ka ya mutu." KASHE

Barazana da barazanar kisa. Hotunan kariyar kwamfuta sun dace da karar batanci na Hilton. Babu wani abu a can game da rayuwar jima'i, ba shakka.

Tags tsiro:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Iesarya ta Yin Amfani: (1) Sprout bai taɓa yawo da adireshin Prause ba. (2) Sabon abin da aka kirkira shine na sanya adireshin ta akan YBOP, kuma an kai mata hari a can. Adireshin ta bai taɓa kasancewa akan YBOP ba. A gaskiya ita yarda cewa ba a taɓa sanya adireshinta a ko'ina ba. Kash

-------

Sprout ba yana nufin Fuskantarwa ba, kuma bai taɓa faɗi cewa ba a zalunci Fuse ba.

Kwana daya. Haka karya.

-------

Ban zagaya adireshinta ba, ita kuma bai faɗi wani abu da nake da shi ba.

Rana guda (2/9/21), karya ɗaya ce:

Kwana guda, tsoho ɗaya.

A cikin wannan zaren, Yi da'awar ikirarin YBOP yana da 2, ooo shafukan "ɓata suna." YBOP yana da manyan shafuka 4 masu amfani da kuma 5 RealYBOP shafuka masu ɗauke da ɓatanci na cin zarafi da yawa.

A cikin zaren Sprout. Darling baya siya mata karya:

--------

Ba shi da wata ma'ana.

------

Na katange Amincewa, duk da haka sai ta dunƙule mini zaren, ta ɓata sunan ni da Sprout. Tabbacin Shaida yana kwance.

------

Kodayake Sprout ya toshe ta, Prause ya shiga zaren Sprout a ƙarƙashin wani tweet.

------

Babu ƙungiyar DJ Burr. Duk BS.

Hoton da aka sanya ya ce Pornhub, ba Yi wasa ba. Wancan ya ce, Yin wasa yana da alaƙa da yawa ga waɗanda ke cikin masana'antar batsa - Shin Nicole Farko ya shawo kan masana'antar Porn?

------

-------

A cikin zaren Staci

------

Yin hira tare da duk sauran masana'antun batsa shills, da da'awar ƙarya cewa ni ke da alhakin dakatar da asusun na ɗan lokaci.

Jima'i yana kwance, kamar yadda ga abin da na faɗa game da harinta:

A ƙarshen 2020, kwatsam sai ta fara da'awar cewa an yi lalata da ita a cikin 2019, kuma ni da alhakin abin ban mamaki. Ta da'awar karya cewa na sanya adireshin ta akan YBOP kuma hakan ya haifar da kama ta akan wani saurayi mai skateboard. Ba ta ba da wata hujja bayyananniya ba game da ko na sanya adireshinta na zahiri ko kuma an kama ta.

Kamar yadda rubuce a cikin wannan sashe da kuma wasu wurare, Karya da aka fi so shine na sanya adreshin ta a YBOP. Ta kwanan nan ta kara zuwa tatsuniyar tata, tana ikirarin karyar cewa wani saurayi ya kama ta “a adireshin da ke YBOP.” Sanin wannan karya ce, yasa a koda yaushe na bukaci ta samar da hoton hoto wanda yake tabbatar da adireshin ta akan YBOP. Tun da ba za ta iya ba, Yi amfani da shi don aika hotunan allo na jerin abubuwan da ta nuna daga 2^nd kara ta rasa ni. Abin baƙin ciki a gare ta, dokokin kotu sun buƙaci Kira don ba ni duk abubuwan da ta nuna a gaban ni kafin a saurari karar (kamar yadda ya kamata in samar mata da duk takardun na). Duba: Fabrairu, 2021: Yi amfani da sakonnin 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 cikin karyar cewa na sanya adireshinta kan YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a cikin 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a cikin 2020 Prause tweeted cewa babu wani, har da ni, da ke da adireshinta na ainihi. Liesaryata ba ta dace ba (takaddun rubutu fiye da kwanaki 5).

----------

3 tweets ta sake yin bayanin sake zarginta na karya game da Staci yayin da ta ke yanar gizo tana yin tweets tana wulakanta Pornhub.

RE: Bin tweets - Ban taɓa cewa Prause tana kwance game da farmakinta ba (duk da cewa ita maƙaryaciya ce, mai tsegumi a intanet, cyberstalker). Na ce tana kwance game da harin da aka samu a wani adireshin da aka sanya akan YBOP: Fabrairu, 2021: Yi amfani da sakonnin 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 cikin karyar cewa na sanya adireshinta kan YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a cikin 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a cikin 2020 Prause tweeted cewa babu wani, har da ni, da ke da adireshinta na ainihi. Liesaryata ba ta dace ba (takaddun rubutu fiye da kwanaki 5).

Cyberstalking don Pornhub, kuma. Wannan lokacin haɗin gwiwa tare da Daraktan Sadarwa na FSC (@Bbchausa), Mike Stabile.

Ba karo na 1 da tayi aiki tare da FSC ba:

Cyberstalking a tweet disparaging Pornhub. Karyata zargin Laila da yin "korafin barazanar masu laifi"

Gwadawa yana nuna yana magana ne akan dakatarwar ta twitter, inda wani ya ba da rahoto game da barazanar barazanar - Maris, 2021: An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na dan lokaci saboda “aika sakonnin tashin hankali”. Tana kwance, saboda twitter bata taba bayyana wanda yayi rahoton ba. Ba za ta iya taimaka wa kwance ba, ko da kuwa duk sanadin twitter ya sani.

---------

Retweets mai cin mutunci Staci tweet

--------

Tallafawa batsahub ta hanyar yanar gizo. Sake yin tweeting Staci tweet.

Na ce - Fabrairu, 2021: Yi amfani da sakonnin 70 a cikin kwanaki 5 cikin karyar cewa na sanya adireshinta kan YBOP - kuma an kama ta a kan titi a cikin 2019 sakamakon haka. Duk da haka a cikin 2020 Prause tweeted cewa babu wani, har da ni, da ke da adireshinta na ainihi. Liesaryata ba ta dace ba (takaddun rubutu fiye da kwanaki 5).

Supportarin goyan baya ga Mindgeek ta hanyar lalata Laila da Staci Sprout (sake aiko da sakon tweet game da Staci).

Labarai, sake aiko da sakonnin Sprout a cikin tweet.

Rana guda - 3 a jere suna taushe Staci. Same gaji karya.

-----------

Sauran hanyoyin haɗin da suka dace:

Oktoba 23, 2020: An dakatar da asusun batsa na masana'antar batsa ta Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) har abada don zalunci da zagi da niyya.
Rubutun kansa na Sprout - CIKIN MULKI, CIKINSA DA KYAUTA DAGA CIKIN SAUKI A CIKIN SAUKI CIKIN SAUKI NA GWAMNATI
Takardar shaidar Sprout a cikin karar bata sunan Alex Rhodes - Nunin # 10: Staci Sprout, LCSW affidavit (15 shafuffuka).
A kan Maris 26, 2020 An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na dan lokaci saboda tursasawa da aka yi da kuma "sanya barazanar mai karfi"

Sauran - Yi Amfani (@BrainOnPorn) zargin ƙarya mai ilimin kwantar da hankali Staci Sprout na kasancewa mai adawa da LGBTQ, tallafawa eugenics, yana cewa "trans ba mutane bane," yana cewa aure "ya kamata kawai ya kasance tsakanin mace da namiji"

Kamar yadda aka bayyana a cikin sassan da suka gabata, An yi amfani da yanar gizo ta hanyar yin lalata da lalata sunan Sprout saboda (1) Sprout ya gabatar da takaddun shaida a cikin karar Hilton da Rhodes, (2) Sprout ya gabatar da tarin mutane na Alex Rhodes don kwat da wando, (3) Sprout ya kare sauran wadanda aka cutar da harin Prause . Kamar yadda yake tare da sassan da suka gabata Tweets ɗin tweets sun cika da ƙarairayi da sifili na ainihi. A zahiri, Sprout yana ci gaba a siyasance kuma yana matukar tallafawa al'ummar LGBTQ.

Kamar yawancin tweets na Prause / @ BrainOnPorn, suna haɗi zuwa bidiyon da aka kirkira wanda aka haɗu tare, maganganun da Don Hilton yayi. Tweets na Prause bai dace da abin da bidiyon ya ƙunsa ba, kuma bidiyon ba ya yin daidai da ainihin abin da Hilton ya faɗa ko mahallin kalaman nasa.

------

Babu wani abu a cikin hotunan kariyar kwamfuta da ke goyan bayan tweet na cin mutuncin tweet. Mugu.

--------

Mummunan karairayi yaci gaba.

------

Praus yana kwance. Hilton ba ya yin shawarwari game da kwalliya.

--------

Varin ƙarya.

----

A'a, Sprout bai taɓa yin shaida a madadin eugenics ba. Menene gaba, Sprout ke da alhakin Holocaust?

Kwana daya. Yi murna da damuwa game da Sprout Hilton ya yi imani. Mun duk sunyi imani da Hilton.

Sake a ranar 12 ga Oktoba. Sake, yin alama Nationalungiyar Ma'aikata na Socialasa (NASW). Hilton bai faɗi waɗannan abubuwan ba.

-------

Karya. Ba a taɓa da'awar Yin wasa yana cikin batsa ba (lura babu wani hoton hoto, ba shakka). Hilton bai taba faɗan waɗannan abubuwan ba.

A kan Maris 26, 2020 An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) don tursasawa da kuma "sanya barazanar mai karfi"

---------

Gudana: Yin amfani da amfani BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin likitan kwantar da hankali Linda Hatch, PhD na "Barazanar kashe ta," "tallafawa & tsokanar barazanar mutuwa," aikata karyar, "yin shiru ga masana kimiyya" kuma a wani bangare ke da alhakin harbe-harben parlour na tausa.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba.

Amincewa da cin mutuncin Linda Hatch ya fara ne a cikin 2013, don mayar da martani ga rubutun Hatch na postunking Yi amfani da ƙarya kewaye da lalataccen binciken EEG (Steele et al., 2013): Abubuwan da ba a san su ba ne a cikin jarida. Hatch ya kasance a gaban hanya kamar yadda takaddun nazari na ɗan adam na ƙarshe suka fallasa irin waɗannan fannoni na binciken: Binciken da aka yi wa matasa Steele et al., 2013. Hatch ya bi wannan tare da ƙarin kyawawan labaran da aka ambata Steele et al., 2013: Kada ku kira shi Hudawa: Dalilin da ya sa muke Bukatan Jima'i Yin jima'i da kuma Maganin Gudanar da Jima'i na Gudanar da Jima'i "Gunaguni" da kuma Masu Bayar da Jakadanci.

A cikin ramuwar gayya ga Hatch yana fallasa Yin amfani da shi kamar yadda yake ɓatar da bincike da binciken Steele et al., Prause ta samu lauya a shagon gaba don aikawa Hatch da cika karya da dakatar da wasika. Duba - Yi amfani da shiru ga mutane tare da neman "babu lamba" na karya da wasiƙun Cease & Desist (Linda Hatch, Rob Weiss, Gabe Deem, Gary Wilson, Marnia Robinson, Alex Rhodes, da sauransu). Yi aiki ya aika C & Ds kamar yadda wasu ke aika katunan ranar haihuwar (C & Ds goma na bogi ne suka nufe ni).

Harafin C & D na Prause ya tafi ga duk wanda yayi shakkar ikirarin nata. Tana samarda su tare da hadin gwiwar lauyanta. Ba su daga kotu. Da alama suna da niyyar dakile zargi da muhawara ta gaskiya. Daga nan sai ta yi amfani da waɗannan C & D ɗin don ƙirƙirar ruɗu da wasiƙun “hukuma” don “tabbatar” wa ƙawayenta cewa mugayen mutane suna damun ta (duk da cewa iƙirarin haruffan ba hujja ba ce kuma an cika su ne kawai). A takaice, C & Ds nata wani bangare ne na yakin neman zabe mai dauke da fasaha. Ta kuma aika kwafin su ga 'yan jarida don karya musu gwiwa daga tuntubar wadanda aka cutar da su.

Daga ƙarshe Prause ta shigar da ƙara game da Hatch tare da Kwamitin Ilimin Hauka na California. An watsar. Duk wannan an bayyana shi a cikin rantsuwar rantsuwar Hatch - Yuli, 2019: Linda Hatch, Shaidar PhD: Laifin cin amanar Donald Hilton da Nicole R Prause.

Za mu fara da BrainOnPorn (Yi amfani) tweeting cewa IITAP, Stefanie Carnes, Staci Sprout da Linda Hatch (@saresource) duk "suna tallafawa barazanar mutuwa." Tweets suna ƙunshe da irin wannan ɗin ɗin na maganganun da ba a sani ba daga maganganun intanet waɗanda ba su da alaƙa da Hatch a kowace hanya.

"Kimiyya ta nuna"? Ta danganta ga wani ra'ayi takarda ta ɗan'uwanmu RealYBOP “masana. "

------

Accarairayi suna zargin Hatch da “barazanar kashe ta” da kuma yi wa forungiyar Personabi'a da Ilimin Halayyar Jama'a ƙarya.

Bugu da ƙari, tana haɗuwa da takardar ra'ayi ta ɗan'uwanta RealYBOP “masana. ” Hatch ya zama daidai da imel ɗin 2015 na gaskiya ga forungiyar don forabi'a da Ilimin halin Socialabi'a sun nuna damuwa mai kyau game da aikin Prause (tuna, Yi amfani da kuskuren gabatar da karatunta na 2013 ga manema labarai).

-------

Arin yin magana da yanar gizo, ɓata suna iri ɗaya.

------

“Barazanar tallafi” na iya zama ɓatanci da se kamar yadda yake nuni da aikata laifi.

-------

Jihohin da Hatch suka yi barazanar kashe mutane. Zargin zargin wani da aikata laifi ɓata suna ne da se. Hotunan kariyar allo iri ɗaya ne na sharhi na intanet Yi amfani da rubutu koyaushe.

-------

Tallafawa barazanar kashe su? ” Gyada kawai.

-------

Ba komai sai karya. Ban buga komai ba daga Linda Hatch. Babu wanda ya ba da shaidar zur sai dai Yin wasa. Duba - Stephanie Carnes, PhD (tabbacin #7)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nope, Ban buga da'awar "jiya" ta Linda Hatch ba.

-------

Babu shaidar zur - Yuli, 2019: Linda Hatch, Shaidar PhD: Laifin cin amanar Donald Hilton da Nicole R Prause.

-------

Karyar da'awar Hatch ta haifar da barazanar mutuwa, amma tare da karkatarwa: zargin laifin harbe-harben da aka yi a Atlanta a kan Hatch. Yaya munin hakan?

A kan Maris 26, 2020 An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) saboda tursasawa da aka yi da kuma “sanya barazanar mai karfi”

Gudana: Yin amfani da amfani BrainOnPorn kuma @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya da NCOSE na “goyan bayan eugenics, "" tallafawa tashin hankali & ingiza barazanar mutuwa, "" kasancewa kungiyar kiyayya, "kasancewa Anti-LGBT, da kuma tunzura harbe-harben da ake yi a Atlanta.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba.

The Cibiyar Kasa ta Kasa ta Kasa (NCOSE) wata babbar manufa ce ta yau da kullun don Prause da laƙabi. Wannan ɓangaren yana ba da haske game da tweets mai ɓarna da ɓatanci ta hanyar Prause ta zargi NCOSE da aikawa ko inganta barazanar mutuwa, sa ido da kisan kai.

Bari mu fara da karyar cewa @BrainOnPorn ya ce NCOSE masu tallafawa masu tsattsauran ra'ayi waɗanda suka yi barazanar kashe duk wanda (Fushin yana bin Alex Rhodes).

--------

A karkashin tweet din Mataimakin Shugaban NCOSE Haley McNamara game da zanga-zangar Pornhub (@BrainOnPorn koyaushe yana wurin don bata sunan wadanda ke magana mara dadi game da masana'antar batsa). Karya ya bayyana cewa NCOSE yana goyan bayan barazanar mutuwa.

-------

Haƙƙarfan mahaukaci cewa NCOSE yana goyan bayan eugenics. (Yi waƙa ya haɗu tare kaɗan daga cikin maganganun mahallin da Don Hilton - amma bai taɓa faɗin wani abu kamar @BrainOnPorn ya bayyana ba.)

-------

Wasu karin tweets guda biyu cike da karya suna da'awar cewa membobin kwamitin sun bayyana cewa yakamata mutane 'yan LGBT su kasance da zama. Oh don Allah

Hakanan BS

---------

Defarin ɓata suna - “tallafawa tashin hankali.”

-------

Tags NCOSE, suna cewa su da sauran mutane ya kamata suyi sihiri su san maganganun kan layi, kuma suyi tir da waɗannan maganganun bazuwar. A gaskiya, yana da Furuciya wanda ke buƙatar yin tir da ƙazantar sa, maganganun kan layi.

--------

Liesarin ƙarya da tsarkakakkun abubuwa. Staci Sprout ba mai magana da yawun kowane rukuni bane, gami da NCOSE.

-------

Sanya zaren 48-tweet. "Barin Nofap, NCOSE, YBOP." Menene ma'anar hakan? Ationsarin zarge-zargen ɓata suna.

-------

Bore tare da sanya maganganun ɓatanci na yau da kullun, @BrainOnPorn yana duba asusun mu na Twitter. Kamar dai muna sarrafa mabiya.

-------

Varamar ƙarya ɗaya.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Abin ƙyama tweet. Gunawa ya ce NCOSE da Laila sun zuga kashe-kashe a ɗakin taro na Maris, 2021 Atlanta. Wani bugun EJ Dickson, wanda ke dauke da "gwani" daya: David Ley.

--------

Yana zargin Laila da haddasa rikici da barazanar aikata laifi. Har yanzu jiran shaida.

--------

Hakanan tsohuwar ƙaryar. Tana matukar damuwa da kungiyoyi masu daukar batsa.

------

Tweeting a karkashin Haley Halverson na NCOSE. Gunaguni ya fusata yayin da ake kushe shi don ɓatar da yanayin bincike a bidiyon Peterson. Gunaguni ya zargi Haley da tunzura barazanar mutuwa. BS

--------

Shiga Haɗin Haɗin Maganar Kyauta a ƙoƙari mara ƙarfi don ƙasƙantar da NCOSE. Me ya sa? Saboda NCOSE tana tallafawa waɗanda ke fama da cutar ta batsah a doka.

FSC da Pornhub na gode.

--------

A kan Maris 26, 2020 An dakatar da asusun Twitter na Nicole Prause (@NicoleRPrause) na dan lokaci saboda "sanya barazanar mai karfi"

Yi amfani da amfani BrainOnPorn da kuma @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya Stefanie Carnes, PhD na "aikata ƙarya," "barazanar kashe masana kimiyya," "hada kai don kare mai tayar da hankali," "tallafawa & tsoratar da barazanar mutuwa," "ƙoƙarin hallaka ta," kuma a wani ɓangare na da alhakin don harbe-harben parlourn Atlanta.

Wannan ɗayan ɓangarorin da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta tallafa wa waɗannan ƙaryar ba. Wannan ɓangaren yana ma'amala da wani babban buri na farko, Stefanie Carnes, PhD. Carnes shine shugaban kungiyar IITAP, babbar kungiya Tabbatar da ilimin likitancin jima'i (takardar shaidar IITAP CSAT ce). Yayinda yawancin Tweets da Ley tweets suka lalata CSATs da IITAP (kamar wannan na gaba), wannan ɓangaren zai haskaka da yawa m tweets ta Yin amfani.

A kan Yin amfani da (@BrainOnPorn) tweets mara kyau. Hotunan da ke ƙasa suna ɗaya daga cikin maganganun wulakanci na 4 ta hanyar maganganun da ba a san su ba wanda Prause ta sanya a ɗaruruwan sauran tweets. @BrainOnPorn ya zargi Carnes da barazanar kashe masana kimiyya. lura: A cikin wannan, da tweets na gaba, @BrainOnPorn ya haɗu da wani yanki na ra'ayi daga memba na RealYBOP Josh Grubbs. Saboda Grubbs ya nuna cewa har yanzu ba a “tabbatar da ingantaccen magani ba,” @ BrainOnPorn / Tweets tweets cewa Stefanie Carne ya yi ƙarya a cikin takaddar da ta yi game da karar batanci na Hilton. Banza.

Yana da Prause wanda ya aikata halaye da yawa na shaidar zur:

-------

Da'awar batanci cewa Stefanie Carnes yana goyan bayan barazanar mutuwa:

-------

Tag IITAP, mai ba da shawarar IITAP tana aika barazanar barazanar. Screenshots suna daga cikin haruffa 3 Anyi amfani dasu don ta gaza karar da ni. Babu wanda ya ambaci barazanar mutuwa. Wasikun marubutan kawai suna maimaita abin da aka fada musu ta hanyar Prause, wanda duk karya ne.

On Oktoba 8th, 2020 Prause ta ci gaba a kan bender 20-tweet cyberstalking bender, shigar da zaren CSATs da masu zafin nama na jima'i, suna watsa mata karya.

Anan ana zargin IITAP da laifin “lalata masana kimiyya.”

Yi amfani da shi kamar yadda @BrainOnPorn ke ƙaryar ƙarya. Gaskiya: Yuli, 2019: Stefanie Carnes, Takaddun shaidar PhD: Laifin cin amanar Donald Hilton da Nicole R Prause & Liberos LLC.

Cyberstalkinging CSAT na - karyar da take tabbatarwa Carnes yayi karya. Ya ambata ɗan ƙungiyar RealYBOP kuma aboki Josh Grubbs.

Anan Yi amfani da cyberstalks CSATs - karyar da take tabbatarwa Carnes yayi karya. Ya ambata ɗan ƙungiyar RealYBOP kuma aboki Josh Grubbs. Da'awa, bisa azanci, cewa Carnes "na iya ƙoƙarin hallaka ku":

Karyata karya Carnes ya cika shaidar zur:

Labarin da Yayi amfani da mummunan rahoto ga SASH mujallar BA a gyara ba. Endarin bayanan kawai ya ba da rahoton wani ƙarancin gyara, wanda ba shi da tasiri a kan sakamako ko ƙarshe.

Rana daya, karya daya ce.

Rana daya, karya daya ce. Babu shaidar da aka bayar game da duk wanda aka kaiwa hari.

Rana daya, karya daya ce. DARVO.

Rana daya, karya daya ce. DARVO.

Rana daya, karya daya ce da'awar shaidar zur.

Rana daya, karya daya ce da'awar shaidar zur.

Kwana guda, karya guda ɗaya har yanzu ƙarya da'awar shaidar zur.

Mai dacewa - Yuli, 2019: Linda Hatch, Shaidar PhD: Laifin cin amanar Donald Hilton da Nicole R Prause & Liberos LLC.

Kwana guda, karya guda ɗaya har yanzu ƙarya da'awar shaidar zur.

Kwana guda, karya guda ɗaya har yanzu ƙarya da'awar shaidar zur. Har ila yau, karya cewa IITAP "tana cikin shigar da kara."

Kwana guda, karya guda ɗaya har yanzu ƙarya da'awar shaidar zur.

Yi amfani da tweeted wani ƙari don nazarin da ta ba da rahoton ƙeta ga jaridar. Thearin ya bayyana cewa ƙananan gyaran ba su da tasiri a sakamakon. Gwadawa da damuwa da jaridar da marubutan ba su da tabbas sosai, suna jagorantar ɗayan marubutan don gabatar da rantsuwa kan rantsuwa da ke rubuce game da halin rashin mutunci na Prause - Bradley Green, PhD (tabbaci #6).

Yayi daidai da tweet.

Ya yi daidai da abin da ya gabata a tweet, amma tare da wata maganar da aka kirkira, watau, cewa Carnes ya “yi wa masu sukar 100 barazana da karar.” Maganar banza.

Kwana daya. Harin CSATs.

Ofarshen ranar 8 ga Oktoba, ashirin da cika cike da tweet rampage.

---------

Don haka, dukkanmu mun haɗu da ƙaunatattunmu, a cikin jihohi 3 bisa ga Prause. Gaskiya? Kotuna sun gano cewa Yin wasa yayi ƙarya: Cin nasarar doka akan mai cin mutunci / ɓatanci Nicole Prause: Ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka azabtar ba!

Kwana guda, yin amfani da yanar gizo CSATs:

Rana mai zuwa. Haka karya.

-------

Ya sake farawa a ranar 13 ga Oktoba tare da tweets 6. Babu wanda ya kai kara na. Na yi kuka tare da CA Psychology Board game da yawancin abin da ke rubuce anan. Kwamitin ya ga halal ne sosai don gudanar da bincike na shekaru 3. Daga qarshe, Hukumar ta yanke shawarar ba za ta yi aiki ba saboda mummunan aikin da Prause ta yi ya faru a wajen aikinta na ilimin halin mutum. Wannan ba haka bane kebewa na abubuwan da aka gabatar a cikin korafi na.

Cyberstalking Carnes, yana cewa ta haɗu tare da mai tayar da hankali, wanda ake ganin Prause yana faɗi shine Donald Hilton. Duk karya, wanda ya haifar da kara: Laifin cin mutunci Donald Hilton game da Nicole Prause: Zazzage PDF na shari'ar Hilton, nune-nunen, da kuma tabbatarwa daga wasu 9 da aka cutar.

Duk da cewa Hilton ta kai kararta, ta sake bata masa suna. Mai koyo a hankali. Bai yi mata kyau ba - Yi amfani da fatarar fayiloli don tsere wa abin alhaki don 3 har yanzu ba a gwada karar batanci ba (Hilton, Rhodes, Minc) kuma guji biyan ni bashin lauyan-bashin da ta ciwo (a nasarar da na samu na Anti-SLAPP)

Tashin zargi ni na farauta Sako da haruffa cike da ƙarya ta masana'antar batsa-shill David Ley da tsohon mai gida na RealYBOP, Daniel Burgess.

Ofari iri ɗaya. Zan iya magana akan Don Hilton, wanda ya kai karar ta.

# 6 don Oktoba 13, 2020. Kadai mutum waɗanda suka yi wa kansu lahani sun Fuskanci.

-----

Accusarin zarge-zarge na shaidar zur, tare da hotunan kariyar kwamfuta / hanyoyin da ba su dace ba.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke zubarwa

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Mugu. Yi amfani sannan ta yi amfani da asusunta na Twitter don nuna cewa IITAP na iya zama alhakin kisan gillar da aka yi a Atlanta. Oh don Allah

-------

Sauran - Gudana: Gudanar da amfani @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya da Ƙungiyar don Ci gaban Harkokin Jima'i (SASH) na "yunƙurin lalata rashin amincewa ta kowane hali," "tallafawa mutuwa & barazanar doka," "tallafawa tsinkaye na Prause," "da'awar cewa Pornhub ne ya ba ta kuɗi," da "tallafawa eugenics."

Ofaya daga cikin abubuwanda aka fi so shine SASH, ƙungiyar masu ilimin hanyoyin kwantar da hankali. Tweets din da ke kasa wasu kadan ne daga sama da yiwa 100 alama ko sanya SASH.

Anan, tana kirkirar mutumin da aka azabtar don amsawa ga Alexander Rhodes (wanda ya kafa reddit / nofap da kuma NoFap.com) yin fayil a gurbata karar da ita. Gwadawa ya bayyana yana ba da shawara (ba daidai ba) cewa SASH yana sanya barazanar mutuwa akan gidan yanar gizon farin jini! Tabbas, babu hoton hoton barazanar barazanar kisan.

Lura - A Nuwamba 11th, kafin Sanarwar NoFap game da karar da mai tara kudi, Prause ta fara tuhuma da gangan cewa ta samu barazanar mutuwa.

----------

Babu wani abu a cikin wannan sakon na gaba mai gaskiya ko dai. Sprout, IITAP da SASH ba su taɓa faɗin Furucin da Pornhub ke bayarwa ba. Kuna iya ganin cewa hotunan kariyar tweets na Sprout ba suyi ikirarin cewa ana amfani da Pornhub ba. Suna faɗar cewa Prause yana jin daɗin masana'antar batsa, wanda gaskiya ne: Shin Nicole Farko ya shawo kan masana'antar Porn? Haka kuma "su" (SASH, IITAP) ba su tabbatar da cewa "Staci Sprout yana kwance ba." Babu hotunan hoto da ke nufin Yin wasa shine wanda yake kwance.

---------

A cikin wannan tweet din ta yi zargin karya SASH na mara min baya a laifukan da ban aikata ba.

Gaskiya? Ta sanya watakila tweets 100 na karyar da'awar cewa na yi wa kaina rauni a cikin jihohi 3. A zahiri, Gwadawa ta la'anci kanta sau da yawa a cikin shigar da kara a kotu kuma a cikin kararraki biyu da ta ɓace mini. Duba:

Amma game da zargin "sa-ido," kotun ta yanke hukunci ta yana kwance: Prauseoƙarin yin ƙoƙari don dakatar da Wilson; an hana umarnin hana ta a matsayin maras kyau & tana da bashin kudade na lauya a cikin hukuncin SLAPP.

Amma ita da'awar FBI ta yi ikirarin, FBI ba ta yarda da Gwadawa ba: Nuwamba, 2018: FBI ta tabbatar da yaudarar Nicole Prause da ke tattare da ikirarin batanci (Gwada yi ƙarya game da shigar da rahoton FBI akan Gary Wilson).

----------

A cikin wannan tweet na gaba muna da da'awar mahaukaci cewa SASH tana tallafawa eugenics. A cikin martani ga Don Hilton ta bata sunan, Yi amfani da shi tare da wasu kaɗan daga cikin maganganun mahallin da Don Hilton, ya sanya su akan YouTube, da da'awar ƙarya cewa yana goyon bayan eugenics.

--------

Wani tweet cike da karya, yana zargin SASH na ƙarya da son “lalata rashin yarda da kowane irin tsada”:

Hotunan allo suna na 3 daga cikin haruffa 4 da tayi tweeted sau da yawa. Abokan da ke kusa da batsa sun rubuta wasiƙun da aka cika da ƙarya bisa umarnin Yin amfani. Ta yi ƙoƙari ta shigar da 4 daga cikin waɗannan haruffa a cikin takaddama na hana cin amanarta, amma alƙali ya ga dama ta hanyar su a matsayin ƙage (marubutan wasiƙan sun sake faɗar abin da Prause ya gaya musu - waɗanda ƙarya ce, ba tare da wata babbar shaidar tallafi ba)

Haruffan da aka zana a cikin tweet na RYBOP na sama, wanda Prause yayi tweeting sau da yawa, basu faɗi abin da take ikirarin sun faɗa ba. Babu wani daga cikin marubutan da ya ce na yi wa mawallafansu bita. Haruffa da ba a taɓa amfani da su ba sun ƙunshi ainihin shaidar da za ta goyi bayan da'awar Prause.

Sauran - Aiki: Yin amfani da @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin Gabe Deem da "tsokanar ta'addanci a cikin gida," "tsokanar tashin hankali ga mata," "shiga cikin misogyny & zamba," "tallafawa barazanar mutuwa & wariyar launin fata," "ƙarfafa kisan kai mata masu ilimin kimiyya, "" suna barazanar kashe mata, "" ya kasance mai adawa da LGBT, "kuma" yana goyan bayan eugenics. "

Bayan Fage: Wannan ɗayan ɓangarori da yawa ne da ke yin rubuce-rubuce a cikin yaƙin neman zaɓe wanda ke gudana inda ta zarge waɗanda ta zaɓa na aika saƙon barazanar mutuwa, ko tallafawa barazanar mutuwa, ko sa wasu su aika barazanar mutuwa. Tabbas, ba ta bayar da wata shaidar da za ta goyi bayan waɗannan ƙaryar ba.

YBOP yayi tir da barazanar, munanan kalamai a shafukan sada zumunta, haka ma duk wanda muka sani. Wannan ya ce, intanet ita ce Wild West. Yawancin mutanen da ke cikin jama'a - na kowane jinsi da jinsi - sun gaya mana cewa a kai a kai suna samun tsoffin maganganu daga masu lalata yanar gizo. Handfulananan maganganun da ba a san su ba Yi amfani da da'awar sun ƙaddamar da kodadde a kwatanta.

Ya bayyana cewa tana bin intanet don shaidar cewa ana cutar da ita, har ma da yin amfani da takaddama ta Reddit na musamman don tattara bayanan da ba a san su ba, maganganun da aka kirkira waɗanda masu tsara taron suka riga suka share su da sauri kuma akai-akai. Sannan tana zargin mutane ta yana son ɓata sunan marubuta ko ƙarfafa maganganun - ba tare da wata shaidar shaidar ba. Yana faɗar cewa ta ɓoye wasu ƙananan misalai na abin da ake zargi da ita. Da alama mutane ba su da isasshen kulawa game da ayyukan Prause don su wahalar da ita.

Sashe na farko sun kuma ba da labarin irin wannan ikirarin na ƙarya cewa Gabe Deem ya aika ko tallafawa mutuwa da barazanar fyade da ke mata.

A kan Rashin ladabi, cike da tweets. Lura - Tweets na Tweets sau da yawa suna cewa Gabe wani ɓangare ne na ƙungiyar ƙirar. Babu Rukuni. Wataƙila tana yin wannan ƙarancin hannu tana tunanin zai kare ta daga shari'ar ɓatanci. Ba haka bane.

Tallafawa ƙiyayya da eugenics, kawai don tweeting takardu ta Donald Hilton? Yi aiki ya sanya bidiyo cike da karya akan ta TruthShallSetSetYouFree ”tashar YouTube iƙirarin Hilton ya faɗi abubuwan da bai yi ba. Don haka, tana amfani da bidiyonta cike da karya a matsayin "shaida" cewa duk wanda ya taba yin tweet game da kayan da Hilton ya nuna adawa da LGBTQ kuma yana tallata eugenics. Shi ke nan.

-------

@BrainOnPorn yayi ikirarin cewa saboda Gabe yana bin Fitowa Cry akan Twitter, yana goyon bayan duk abin da EC tayi ko tsaye. Ba tare da la'akari ba, Fitowa kuka bai faɗi abin da @BrainOnPorn ya tabbatar ba.

Wani, a rana guda. Yanzu Gabe yana karfafa kisan kai! Wannan bata suna ne da se saboda tana zargin Gabe da aikata laifi.

Kwana daya. "Barazanar kashe mata." Mahaukaci. (Bugu da ƙari, babu "rukuni.")

Kwana daya. Hakanan maganganun 4 guda ɗaya ta ɓoye mara izini. (Lura - ta ce Gabe ya san komai game da maganganun 4, amma @BrainOnPorn ya toshe shi. Don haka, koda kuwa yana so ya “kushe” maganganun bazuwar, ba a hukumance ya san akwai su ba.)

Kwana daya. Tallafawa ƙiyayya da eugenics, don kawai aika bidiyo ta Donald Hilton, MD? Yi aiki ya sanya bidiyo cike da karya akan ta TruthShallSetSetYouFree ”tashar YouTube, da'awar Hilton ya faɗi abubuwan da bai yi ba. Don haka, tana amfani da bidiyonta cike da karya a matsayin "shaida" cewa duk wanda ya taba yin tweet game da kayan da Hilton ya sabawa LGBTQ kuma yana tallata eugenics. Shi ke nan.

Kwana daya. Kazafi iri daya.

--------

Tags Gabe, mai ba da shawara shi da wasu na iya aika barazanar kisa. Fadakarwa: Tana ikirarin cewa tana karbar “barazanar mutuwa” tun daga shekarar 2010. Koyaya, dinbin maganganun da ba a san su ba wadanda za a iya fassara su a zaman barazanar sun fara ne kawai a shekarar 2019.

Kwana daya. Gwadawa tana tweeting cewa ni sanannen mai laifi ne. Da gaske? Wannan labari ne a gare ni, da kuma cin mutunci mara kyau ta hanyar amfani da Prause.

Da yake magana game da doka: Cin nasarar doka akan mai cin mutunci / ɓatanci Nicole Prause: Ita ce mai aikata laifin, ba wanda aka azabtar ba!

Kwana daya. Duk karairayi, kamar yadda take ikirarin karya ni ina zagin mata a duk duniya. Tana sanya haruffa guda 3 nata, wadanda basa faɗin abin da tweets ɗin ke ikirari.

Amma ga stalking, my nasarar farko ta shari'a ta fallasa Nicole Prause a matsayin mai aikatawa, ba wanda aka cutar da shi ba. A ranar 6 ga watan Agusta, 2020 babbar Kotun karamar Hukumar Los Angeles ta yanke hukuncin cewa yunkurin bogi na Prause ya samu umarnin hana ni ya zama wani mummunan abu kuma wanda ba shi da doka “a shari'ar dabaru game da halartar jama'a" (galibi ana kiranta da "SLAPP kwat"). Amincewa yayi ƙarya a cikin yaudarar ta TRO, yana bayarwa sifilin tabbataccen shaida don tallafa mata da'awar waje cewa na tsane ta ko na takura mata. A takaice, Kotun ta gano cewa Prause ta wulakanta tsarin takunkumin don tursasa ni yin shiru kuma ta danne hakkina na fadin albarkacin baki. A doka, hukuncin SLAPP ya tilasta Wajan biyan kuɗin lauya na.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A ranar 23 ga Oktoba, 2020 An dakatar da asusun masana'antar batsa na shill din Twitter (@BrainOnPorn) na dindindin don cin zarafi da zagi. Wannan yana nufin cewa tilasta tilasta yin amfani da ita @NicoleRPrause lissafi don tweet guda karya, farfaganda da cin mutunci. Kuna iya gani a ƙasa cewa Tweets na NicoleRPrause kusan suna da kama da datti da @BrainOnPorn ke watsawa.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Da ke ƙasa Prause ya shiga zaren shekara 3. Ta haɗu da sabon shafin maye gurbin RealYBOP, wanda Ni yanzu na mallaka. Ganin yadda yake yada labaran karya na asusun RealYBOP din ta tweeted.

----------

Shigar da zaren shekara 3, yana ba da shawarar Gabe ya tsokano ta'addanci, tashin hankali ga mata, misogyny da zamba. Tana haɗin yanar gizo zuwa sabon shafin maye gurbin RealYBOP (wanda na mallaka yanzu). Ka lura da yadda sabon rukunin yanar gizon yake birge masu sha'awar YBOP, FTND, Nofap, da Fitowa Kuyi a cikin taken shafin yanar gizon sa. Waɗannan su ne ainihin maƙasudin masana'antar batsa. Hmmm….

Kamar yadda kowa zai iya gani, Ganin shine mai aiki na @BrainOnPorn Twitter.

--------

Shigar da zaren Gabe, kodayake an toshe ta, tana aika rubuce rubuce game da ta'addancin da take yi a dandalin dawo da batsa. Ka tuna cewa Babban batsa yana da matukar damuwa ta hanyar tattaunawar dawo da batsa, yayin da suke ba da izinin waɗanda batsa ta intanet ta shafa da kyau don raba labaransu tare da takwarorinsu. Idan aka ba da kyakkyawar alaƙar da ke tare da masana'antar batsa, ba abin mamaki ba ne cewa ta yi amfani da kowane zarafi don yi wa mutane bayani game da waɗannan tarurruka.

A hakikanin gaskiya, tarurruka na dawo da batsa wasu daga cikin abokai ne, mafi yawan tallafi da haɗin yanar gizo. Baƙi sukan yi sharhi a kan wannan. Amma duk da haka masana'antar batsa da shills dinta zai sa kowa ya yi imanin cewa fagen dawo da ita dandali ne na mugayen ƙungiyoyin ƙiyayya. Yaƙin neman zaɓe mai ƙyama, eh?

Kwana daya. Tweeting duk inda aka ambaci Gabe, ta sanya labarin batsa na batsa:

Shigar da zaren Gabe, duk da cewa an toshe ta, tana aika rubuce rubucenta na karya kan tattaunawar dawo da batsa wanda ke nuna Gabe tana koyar da mummunan tashin hankali.

Haɗin gwiwa tare da takwararta ta yanar gizo mai suna @SexualSocialist:

------

Posting ta Matsakaici labarin, kai hari siffofin dawo da batsa kamar Sake yi

--------

Wani nutty tweet. Screenhtst ba shi da komai tare da abin da ake kira Prause. Bugu da ƙari, don tallafawa batsahub:

Kamar yadda kake gani, hotunan kariyar ba su faɗi abin da take da'awa ba (ba su taɓa yin Nikky ba):

---------

Kashegari, sanya Posting Gabe, wanda ya toshe ta

Sauran - Gudana: Gudanar da amfani da @BrainOnPorn da @NicoleRPrause don zargin ƙarya da yaƙi da Sabon Magungunan (FTND) na kasancewa mai adawa da LGBT, "inganta misogyny," "aikata zamba," da "koyarwa eugenics. "

Kafin na Laila Mickelwait Yakin TraffickingHub, Yakai Sabon Magungunan kuma ni sun kasance abubuwan da aka fi so. Waɗannan sassan suna ƙunshe da lokuta da yawa na Faɗar ɓatanci da hargitsi FTND:

Sashin yanzu yana sadaukar da sakonnin tweets ne waɗanda basu dace da sassan da ke sama ba.

Muna farawa da asusun guda biyu waɗanda yanzu aka dakatar don cin zarafin niyya. Babu wani abu a cikin mai zuwa @ BrainOnPorn's tweet yana da goyan bayan shaidu (@BrainOnPorn yana nuna FTND yana adawa da 'yan luwadi).

---------

Adireshin hanyar sadarwa ta SLT da aka tsara game da FTND, suna nuna cewa FTND ya sabawa LGBT:

Kalmar 600 mai suna Op-Ed tana cike da maganganun da ba'a tallata su ba don yaudarar jama'a. Ya kasa tallafawa maganganun guda ɗaya kamar yadda yake faɗar takardu 4 kawai - babu ɗayansu da ke da alaƙa da jarabar batsa, tasirin batsa akan dangantaka, ko matsalolin lalata da ke haifar da batsa. Masana da yawa a cikin wannan fagen sun karyata maganganunta da maganganun wofi a cikin wannan ɗan gajeren martani - Opin: Wane ne yake karya tsarin kimiyya akan batsa? (2016). Ba kamar "masana ilimin lissafi na Op-Ed ba," wanda aka rubuta ta hanyar Prause, sun ambaci ɗari da yawa da nazari da yawa na wallafe-wallafen.

--------

RealYBOP yace FTND tana inganta misogyny. Menene alamomin tweets da aka ambata akan reddit suna da alaƙa da FTND? Babu komai.

------

Karyata zargin FTND da aikata zamba, lokacin da ta bayyana binciken daidai:

Gwadawa yana ƙoƙari ya kunna wasannin da Paul Wright ya bayyana: Paul Wright PhD Ya Kira Pornwararrun Resewararrun Masu Binciken Batsa (2021) ta hanyar watsi da yawancin karatun karatu na dogon lokaci wanda ke nuna amfani da batsa yana haifar da cutarwa.

---------

Kira ga FTND mai adawa da ɗan kishili yayin tweeting ta debunked op-ed (Op-ed: Wanene yake kuskuren bayyana ilimin kimiyya akan batsa ?, 2016):

Ka lura da yadda Fuskantarwa ke ɓata sunan FTND a cikin zaren inda ake sukar batsa mai zafi. Shin wannan ya fi dacewa da goyon baya ga tsaron Pornhub?

-------

A cikin wannan tweet na gaba muna da mahaukaci, mummunan iƙirarin cewa FTND yana koyar da ilimin eugenics:

A amsa ga Don Hilton ta bata sunan, Yi amfani da shi tare da wasu 'yan maganganun mahallin da Don Hilton, ya sanya su a YouTube, kuma ya yi da'awar ƙarya cewa yana goyon bayan eugenics. Dabarar mugunta ce mafi karanci.