Kukho i-tweet ye-semi-viral yi-porn-industry friendly sexologist, uDavid Ley, ehambahamba ebanga ukuba isifundo esaziwayo esivela e-China siye sarhoxiswa. Ingxaki kukuba uphando olusisiseko ayikarhoxiswa. Ukuba ufumanisa oku kudidayo, awuwedwa.
Izazinzulu eziqhuba uphando kubasebenzisi be-porn abanengxaki (kunye nezihloko ezinxulumeneyo) bahlala bejongana neenzame zokuthintela inkxaso-mali, ukuvunywa kwebhodi, kunye nokupapashwa kweziphumo zabo. Ukuba banethamsanqa ngokwaneleyo ukuba badlule kuyo yonke le miqobo, basenokujongana neenzame ezingapheliyo zeePhD ezinobuhlobo kwishishini lokuba amaphepha abo arhoxiswe ngenxa yezizathu ezingenasiseko.
Ubuchopho bakho kumseki kade we-Porn (kunye nombhali we eyona ncwadi ithengiswa kakhulu) UGary Wilson wayesoloko ephantsi kwezo nzame zokuvalelwa, kuquka neenzame ezahlukeneyo zokusilela iphepha lakhe libhalwe kunye noogqirha abasixhenxe baseUnited States Navy. Emva kokuba iinzame zokubamba zingaphumelelanga, isazi sezesondo esiqhagamshelwe kwishishini lezocansi salandela ijenali ngokwayo, siyigxeka kwiWikipedia nakwezinye iindawo kwi-Intanethi.
Kwakhona…
Ngelishwa, eli qhinga liqheliselwe kakuhle kwi “Incwadi yokudlala kwishishini le-porn" iphinde yavela mva nje. Ngeli xesha, isazi sezesondo esiqhagamshelwe kumzi-mveliso sibonakala sinayo inguqulelo (yephepha langaphambili) kwimpembelelo ye-ejaculation kwi-testosterone "ihoxisiwe" ngenxa yesizathu esilula sokuba yayiyinguqulelo epheleleyo kunye nomhla omtsha wokupapashwa, kwaye kungekhona iphepha lokuqala (elaliguqulelwe kuphela kwisiNgesi).
"Inqaku lokurhoxisa" iyafumaneka Apha. It ichaza ngokucacileyo ukuba ukurhoxiswa kwavunyelwa kuba yayiyinguqulelo yesiNgesi yenqaku lesiTshayina elipapashwe ngaphambili ngumbhali ofanayo.
Iphepha lokuqala, elipapashwe malunga neenyanga ezintathu ngaphambi kokuguqulelwa kwesiNgesi, lihlala lingarhoxiswa kwaye linjalo iyafumaneka ukuze ijongwe apha. Olu vavanyo lwamva nje lwesayensi alilishwa kubantu abangakwaziyo ukufunda isiMandarin. Nangona kunjalo iphepha elipheleleyo lishwankathelwe kakuhle kwi-abstract yephepha lokuqala, elisekho kwi-intanethi kwi-PubMed:
Abstract
Injongo yolu phononongo yayikukumisela utshintsho kwinqanaba lehomoni yesini emadodeni emva kokuphuma kwe-ejaculation. Imilinganiselo ye-serum testosterone yamavolontiya angamadoda angama-28 yaphandwa yonke imihla ngexesha lokuziyeka emva kokuphuma. Sifumene ukuba ukuguquguquka kwamanqanaba e testosterone ukusuka kumhla we-2 ukuya kumhla we-5 wokuziyeka kwakuncinci. Ngomhla we-7 wokuziyeka, i-peak ye-serum testosterone yabonakala, ifikelela kwi-145.7% yesiseko (P <0.01). Emva kwencopho, akukho kuguquguquka rhoqo kwabonwa. Ukuphuma kwe-ejaculation kwakusisiseko kunye nokuqala kwe-7 days' periodic phenomenon. Ukuba kwakungekho kukhutshwa kwe-ejaculation, akukho tshintsho lwamaxesha ngamaxesha kwinqanaba le-serum testosterone. Ezi ziphumo zibonisa ukuba utshintsho lwamaxesha athile kwinqanaba le-serum testosterone lubangelwa kukukhupha.
Ngoko ke unayo. Ngaphandle kwamabango angekho ngqiqweni ngabachwephesha bezesondo abanobuhlobo kwishishini, umxholo wephepha awukarhoxiswa. Kananjalo alunalo uphando olusisiseko. The isifundo sokuqala ayikarhoxiswa. Kuphela yinguqulelo epapashiweyo “eye yarhoxiswa” ngenxa yokuba yikopi eguqulelweyo yeqela elinye lophando phambi iphepha. Inzululwazi yophononongo olusisiseko ihlala ilungile kwaye ingacetywanga. Iphepha lisaxhasa ubukho be-serum testosterone spike yethutyana malunga neentsuku ze-7 zokuyeka ukuphuma.
Ke kutheni le nto izazi ngesondo ze-pro-porn kwi-Twitter zithetha ukuba "irhoxisiwe" ngenxa yokungabinangqondo?
I-tweet ethile-eyintsholongwane ye-sexologist ye-sexologist uDavid Ley ugxininisa ukuba yonke ingcamango ye-7-day testosterone spike ayisasebenzi. ULey wade wathumela kuTwitter ukuba eli phepha “yinzululwazi engafanelekanga.” Iiakhawunti ezininzi eziqhagamshelwe kwishishini le-porn zikhuthaza kakhulu i-tweet yakhe ye-semi-viral. Ngaba sibukele izixhobo ze-pornformation disinformation zisebenza?
Kutheni le nto "ingcali yonyango" ingalahlekisa abantu abaninzi kangangoko, ixoka ngelithi uphononongo olubambekayo ngokwalo lurhoxisiwe kwaye luyi "#junksscience"? Kutheni le nto le therapist ijolise kwiphepha elineminyaka engama-20 ubudala elivela eTshayina?
Ngaba iNofap yeyona nto ekujoliswe kuyo?
I-7-day boost ye-testosterone yanceda ukukhuthaza ukudalwa kwe NoFap, enye yeewebhusayithi ezinkulu zokubuyisela umlutha we-porn kwi-intanethi. Ngokuzama ukujongela phantsi eli phepha, iiPhDs ezinobuhlobo kwishishini zicinga ukuba ziyayigxeka iNoFap. Kwaye nokujongela phantsi uninzi lweziyobisi ezingamanyala ezichaza olu phononongo njengenkuthazo yokuzama kuqaliswa kwakhona (okt, ixesha lokuphelisa i-porn-fueled masturbation).
Inyani yeyokuba ngelixa iphepha liphefumlele ngokuyinxenye ukudalwa kwe I-Reddit/NoFap subreddit emva kwi-2011, apho babamba umngeni wokuphepha we-7-day ejaculation, iNoFap iphosa emva ngokuchasene namabango okuba ukukhwebuka kwi-orgasm ixesha elide kunempembelelo ebonakalayo kumanqanaba e testosterone. Kunjalo ke Ubunjani bakho kwiSigonyo. I-NoFap ayizange ixhome umnqwazi wayo kweli phepha linye. Iphepha lincede nje i-subreddit ukutsala iqela layo lokuqala leFapstronauts. Nokuba uphononongo olusisiseko luye lwarhoxiswa (belungekho), eli phepha alibalulekanga kangako malunga neembono zewebhusayithi. Lithini elinye iphepha malunga namanqanaba e-serum testosterone egazi-serum anento yokwenza nokuba likhoboka le-porn okanye alikho?
I-NoFap yaqala njengeforum yokusingatha imiceli mngeni yeveki kunye nenyanga ukuba uyeke okwethutyana ekuphululeni amalungu esini. Ngokukhawuleza kwavela kwindawo yokubuyisela umlutha we-porn-addiction, xa abathathi-nxaxheba baqonda ingxaki yokwenene kwiimpawu zabo: ukusetyenziswa kakhulu kwe-porn. Zikhona ngoku Izifundo ezisekelwe kwi-neuroscience ezingama-60 ezixhasa imodeli ye-porn-addiction. Ngaphezu koko, ngaphezulu Izifundo ze-50 ikhonkco lokusebenzisa i-porn/umlutha we-porn kwiingxaki zesini kunye nokuhlahlela okuphantsi kwi-stimuli yesondo. Izifundo ze-7 zokuqala kolu luhlu zibonisa i-causation, njengoko abathathi-nxaxheba baphelisa ukusetyenziswa kwe-porn kwaye baphilisa ukungasebenzi kwesondo okungapheliyo. Ngamafutshane, uninzi lwesayensi luxhasa imbono yokuba ukusetyenziswa kwe-porn engapheliyo kunokukhokelela kwiingxaki, kwaye ukuphepha kwi-porn kunokukhokelela ekubuyiseleni ezo ngxaki.
Kwakutheni ukuze uDavid Ley abonise ukuba ugxa wakhe osenyongweni ubonakala esemva “kokurhoxiswa” kwephepha eliguqulelweyo?
Kwiposti yebhlog, umhlobo osondeleyo kaDavid Ley, naye uyonwabela a ubudlelwane obuhle kunye nomzi mveliso we-porn, wazizukisa ngokuqalisa iimeko ezakhokelela koko kubizwa ngokuba “kukurhoxa.” Babonakala bezama ukufikelela olu sukelo kangangeenyanga ezininzi. Ekugqibeleni, basilela, baphumelela kuphela ekufumaneni okulandelayo, okupheleleyo, translation zisuswe.
Kutheni le nto “isazinzulu” sinokuzama ukuhlolisisa inguqulelo elunge ngakumbi yophando lwenzululwazi eyapapashwa phantse kwiminyaka engama-20 ngaphambili neyayingazange ingasebenzi? Kutheni le nto "isazinzulu" senza umsebenzi wabo ukuzama ukufumana ikhona Ukuguqulelwa kwephepha elithi “retracted?”
Ngaba inokuba kungenxa yokuba esi “sazi” sikhululekile kwishishini lamanyala, kuquka neqela lalo eliphembelela? Ngaba kungenxa yokuba le "sazinzulu" sichitha ixesha elininzi sihlambalaza nabani na onesibindi sokuphakamisa ulwazi malunga nemiphumo emibi kunye nobungozi bokusetyenziswa okungamanyala kwedijithali?
Okokugqibela, kutheni uDavid Ley esithi ababhali ababini bolu phando “ababonakali bekhona”?
Ababhali basuka eTshayina. Iphepha lapapashwa phantse iminyaka eli-20 eyadlulayo. Mhlawumbi emva kweminyaka engama-20 batshintsha iidilesi zabo ze-imeyile. Mhlawumbi emva kweminyaka emalunga nama-20 baye bayeka ukushumayela. Mhlawumbi abathethi IsiNgesi, okanye abazamkeli ii-imeyile ezivela kwiidilesi ze-imeyile ezingezizo ezaseTshayina.
Kungenxa yokuba umntu engayiphenduli (ngokungathandabuzekiyo) i-imeyile enobutshaba kunye/okanye etyholayo malunga nephepha elipapashwe phantse kwiminyaka engamashumi amabini eyadlulayo ayithethi ukuba umntu akakho. Ngaba kufanele kufumaneke uncedo kubabhali bokuqala, ngoku “abanokurhoxa” kwirekhodi yabo yokuzama ukuguqulela iphepha lolwimi lwesiTshayina kwisiNgesi ukuze abantu abaninzi balifunde? Kuyabonakala ukuba abahleli bejenali bacinga ukuba yayilicebo elilungileyo ukwenza inguqulelo epheleleyo ifumaneke kubafundi abathetha isiNgesi.
Mininzi imibuzo, kodwa akunakwenzeka ukuba sifumane iimpendulo nanini na kungekudala. Nokuba yeyiphi na imeko, inika umdla into yokuba izazi ngesondo ezixhasa ishishini lamanyala ngokuchasene nokuqinisekiswa kweminyaka yobudala (abazibona “njengokujongwa” kwephonografi) ngoku bathatha inxaxheba ekuvavanyeni nasekufanekiseni kakubi uphando olusemthethweni abangaluthandiyo. Kwaabantu abafanayo abasemva kolu vavanyo lwephepha lezenzululwazi bazame ukuphonononga ubuchopho bakho kwi-Porn ngokurhweba nge-URL yayo.
Ngubani owayenokuqikelela ukuba siya kufikelela kwindawo apho abo bakhusela ngokungqongqo iphonografi bazabalazela ukukhangela intetho kunye nomsebenzi wabanye? Ukanti silapha.
;
