Ukubheka i-"Men's Health" isihloko sikaGavin Evans: "Ingabe Ukubuka I-Porn Iningi Kunika Ukunikezwa Kwe-Erectile?" (2018)

Isingeniso

Ngeshwa i-YBOP kumele iphikise ngokuphelele enye ingxenye yenkulumo-ze ye -Men's Health ephika ukungasebenzi kahle kocansi okubangelwa ucansi. Isihloko samanje sibonisa esinye isihloko esidukisayo i-YBOP esiphikisiwe ezinyangeni ezimbalwa ezedlule: Ukuphikisa “Ingabe kufanele ukhathazeke ngokungasebenzi kahle kobulili okubangelwa ucansi?” – nguClaire Downs we-Daily Dot. (2018).

Ngaphambi kokuba ngikhulume ngezisho ezithile, nansi izifundo uGavin Evans angazinakanga (?) :

• Ezinye izindaba ze-3,000 zabantu bokuqala zokutakula ezinkingeni zocansi ezibangelwa ucansi (Ukubuyisela kabusha ama-akhawunti 1, Ukubuyisela kabusha ama-akhawunti 2, Ukubuyisela kabusha ama-akhawunti 3, Izindaba zokubuyiselwa ze-PIED ezimfushane).
• Izinkinga zobulili nezinkinga zobulili? Lolu hlu luqukethe izifundo ezingaphezu kwe-35 ezixhumanisa ukusetshenziswa kwe-porn / ukubheja kocansi ezinkingeni zobulili nokuvusa okuncane ezenzweni zobulili. The Ucwaningo lokuqala lwe-7 ohlwini lubonisa ibangela, njengoba abahlanganyeli beqede ukusetshenziswa kwezingcolile kanye nokuphulukisa okungavamile kocansi.
• Imiphumela yocansi ebuhlotsheni? Izifundo ezingaphezu kwe-75 zixhumanisa ukusetshenziswa kwe-porn kuya ukwaneliseka okuncane kwezocansi nokwabelana ngokobudlelwano. Njengoba sisazi konke Izifundo ezibandakanya abesilisa ziye zabika ukusetshenziswa okuningi kocansi okuxhunyiwe abampofu ukwaneliseka ngokobulili noma ngokobudlelwano.
• Izindatshana ezingaphezu kuka-140 nezingxoxo ezicaphuna ochwepheshe abaningi (urology professors, urologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, sexologists, MDs) abavuma futhi baphumelela ngokuphatha i-porn-kuhoxiswa ED kanye nokulahlekelwa izithombe ezingcolile zobulili.
• Ukulutha kobulili / ucansi? Leli khasi libala Ucwaningo lwe-50 lwe-neuroscience (I-MRI, i-FMRI, i-EEG, i-neuropsychological, i-hormonal). Banikeza ukusekela okuqinile ngesimodeli sokulutha kwezidakamizwa njengoba iziphumo zabo zibuyisa ukutholakala kwezinzwa ezibikiwe ezifundweni zokulutha izidakamizwa.
• Imibono yangempela yezobuchwepheshe ekubhekaneni nocansi / ucansi? Lolu hlu luqukethe Ukubuyekezwa kwezincwadi ezingama-25 zakamuva nezincazelo ngezinye zezazi eziphezulu zezinzwa emhlabeni. Bonke basekela imodeli yokulutha.
• Izimpawu zokulutha umlutha nokukhula kwezinto ezimbi kakhulu? Izifundo ezingaphezu kwe-45 ezibika okutholakele zihambisana nokukhula kokusetshenziswa kocansi (ukubekezela), ukujwayela izithombe zobulili ezingcolile, ngisho nezimpawu zokuhoxiswa (zonke izimpawu nezimpawu ezihlobene nokulutha).
• Ukuxilongwa okusemthethweni? Umbhalo wezokwelapha wezokwelapha osetshenziswa kakhulu emhlabeni, I-International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), iqukethe ukuxilongwa okusha efanelekile ukulutha izidakamizwa: "Ukucindezeleka Ngokuziphatha Ngokwemvelo. "

Ukungahlehlisi nokumiswa

The Impilo Yamadoda izihloko eziveziwe UDkt Nicole Prause, non-academic obhekene nokukhathazeka nge debunking PIED, esebenze a Impi ye-3 yeminyaka ngokumelene nephepha lezemfundo, ngenkathi ihlukumeza futhi ikhulule izinsizwa ezifanayo futhi ezithole ukungasebenzi kahle kwezocansi. Bona imibhalo: I-Gabe Deem #1, I-Gabe Deem #2, U-Alexander Rhodes #1, U-Alexander Rhodes #2, U-Alexander Rhodes #3, I-Noah Church, U-Alexander Rhodes #4, U-Alexander Rhodes #5, U-Alexander Rhodes #6, U-Alexander Rhodes #7, U-Alexander Rhodes #8, U-Alexander Rhodes #9, Alexander Rhodes # 10, Alex Rhodes # 11, UGabe Deem no-Alex Rhode ndawonye # 12, Alexander Rhodes # 13, U-Alexander Rhodes #14, IGabe Deem # 4, U-Alexander Rhodes #15.

U-Prause uqoqe umlando omude wokuhlukumeza ababhali, abacwaningi, abelaphi, izintatheli nabanye abanesibindi sokubika ubufakazi bokulimala okuvela ekusebenziseni izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ku-inthanethi. Ubonakala ekhululekile kakhulu embonini yezithombe zobulili ezingcolile , njengoba kungabonakala kulesi sithombe sakhe (ngakwesokudla) ekhaphethini elibomvu lomcimbi wemiklomelo ye-X-Rated Critics Organisation (XRCO) . (Ngokusho kwe-Wikipedia i- XRCO Awards inikezwa yi-American X-Rated Critics Organisation minyaka yonke kubantu abasebenza kwezokuzijabulisa kwabantu abadala futhi yiyona kuphela imiklomelo yemboni yabantu abadala ebekelwe amalungu emboni kuphela. ^[1] ). Kubonakala sengathi u-Prause kungenzeka ukuthi wathola abaculi bezithombe zobulili ezingcolile njengezihloko ngeqembu elithakaselayo embonini yezithombe zobulili ezingcolile, i- Free Speech Coalition. Izihloko ze-FSC kuthiwa zisetshenziswe ocwaningweni lwakhe lwezibhamu oluqashiwe ohlelweni "lokuzindla nge-Orgasmic" olungcolile kakhulu nolwezentengiselwano kakhulu . U-Prause uphinde wenza izimangalo ezingasekelwa mayelana nemiphumela yezifundo zakhe kanye nezindlela zocwaningo lwakhe . Ukuze uthole imibhalo eminingi, bheka: Ingabe uNicole Prause Uthonywe Yimboni Yezithombe Zobulili Ezingcolile?

Ake siqale ngochungechunge lukaPrause lokwaziswa okungelona iqiniso nezisho ezingamanga:

Amadoda amaningi abukela i-porn, ngakho-ke umcabango wokulahlekelwa ngokobulili wangempela ngoba ubuke amavidiyo amaningi kakhulu we-X, ngokuzwakalayo, ithemba elihle kakhulu. Sasiqine ukusebentisa okuhlangenwe nakho kwamadoda amabili nje kuphela ukuveza izwe eligcwele abantu ababukela izithombe zobulili ezingcolile, ngakho saxoxa nabacwaningi abambalwa bezocansi abane-Ph.Ds ukuze uthole imininingwane embalwa ukuthi ngabe umkhuba wakho ungabangela ingathí sina izinkinga ngokuphila kwakho kocansi.

Isinqumo? Abukho ubufakazi besayensi obusekela umqondo wokuthi "ukungasebenzi kahle kwe-erectile okubangelwa ucansi."

“Kunezifundo ezintathu zelebhu ezibonise ukuthi ukubuka amafilimu ocansi akuhlobene nokusebenza kwe-erectile,” kusho uNicole Prause, Ph.D., umsunguli weLiberos, inkampani yocwaningo locansi kanye ne-biotechnology eLos Angeles. (Ungazithola lezo zifundo lapha , lapha , futhi lapha .)

"Akukho sifundo esake saxhumanisa laba bobabili," esho. "Abelaphi bakhiqiza umqondo wokuthi lezi zinto zixhunywe ezigulini zabo."

Um…akulona iqiniso ukusho ukuthi akukho cwaningo oluxhumanise ukusetshenziswa kocansi nezinkinga zocansi. Eqinisweni, manje sekukhona cishe izifundo ezingu-40 ezixhumanisa ukusetshenziswa kocansi/umlutha wocansi nezinkinga zocansi kanye nokwehlisa ukuvusa inkanuko nezisusa zocansi . Akuzona nje izifundo zokuhlobana: izifundo zokuqala ezingu-7 ohlwini zibonisa imbangela , njengoba ababambiqhaza beqeda ukusebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile futhi baphulukisa izinkinga zocansi ezingamahlalakhona. Kalula nje, izinkinga zocansi ezibangelwa izithombe zobulili zikhona ngoba ochwepheshe bezokwelapha bacele abesilisa abasebasha ukuthi bayeke izithombe zobulili ezingcolile - futhi baphulukisa izinkinga zocansi ezingamahlalakhona (i-ED, i-Anorgasmia, ukuphuphuma kwesisu okulibazisekile, isifiso socansi esiphansi). Hlola amaqiniso noma ubani?

Kuthiwani ngesimangalo sikaPrause maqondana nezifundo ze-3 azikhombisile:

"Kunezifundo ezintathu zelebhu ezibonise ukuthi ukubuka amafilimu ocansi akuhlobene nokusebenza kwe-erectile." (Ungazithola lezo zifundo lapha , lapha , futhi lapha .)

Okokuqala, akukho noyedwa kulezi zifundo "okwakuyizifundo zelebhu", ngakho-ke ungasinaki leso simangalo. Ucwaningo lokuqala olubalwe empeleni lusekela umbono wokuthi ukusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile kubangela izinkinga zocansi njengoba u-71% wabasebenzisi bezithombe zobulili ezingcolile abasebenzisa kakhulu kulolu cwaningo babenezinkinga zocansi ezingamahlalakhona! Lesi esinye isibonelo sentatheli ehluleka ukuhlola amaqiniso, njengoba izintatheli ezibhala izihloko mayelana nezithombe zobulili ezingcolile zivame ukwehluleka ukwenza . Amaphepha esibili nawesithathu (elinye kwakungelona ucwaningo) ohlwini agxekwa kakhulu ezincwadini ezibuyekezwe ontanga, kanti abaningi babuza kokubili okutholakele kanye nezindlela. Ngezansi sihlola amaphepha amathathu ngokwahlukana:

I-PAPER #1: Sutton et al., I-2015:

Izici Zesiguli Ngohlobo Lokudluliselwa Kwe-Hypersexuality: Ukubuyekezwa Kweshadi Lobuningi Lamacala Abesilisa Alandelanayo angu-115 (2015) – Ucwaningo olwenziwe kumadoda (isilinganiso seminyaka engu-41.5) anezinkinga ze-hypersexuality, njenge-paraphilias, ukushaya indlwabu okungapheli noma ukuphinga. Amadoda angu-27 ahlukaniswe “njengabagwema ukushaya indlwabu,” okusho ukuthi ashaya indlwabu (ngokuvamile ngokusebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile) ihora elilodwa noma ngaphezulu ngosuku, noma ngaphezulu kwamahora angu-7 ngesonto. Amadoda angu-71% ashaya indlwabu ezithombeni zobulili ezingcolile abike izinkinga zokusebenza kocansi, kanti angu-33% abike ukuthi ukuphuphuma kwendlwabu kuye kwalibaziseka (ngokuvamile okubangela i-ED ebangelwa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile).

Yikuphi ukungasebenzi kahle kocansi okungama-38% kwabesilisa abasele abanakho? Ucwaningo alusho, futhi ababhali baye bangazinaki izicelo eziphindaphindwayo zemininingwane. Izinketho ezimbili eziyinhloko zokungasebenzi kahle kocansi kwabesilisa 'ukungasebenzi kahle kwe-erectile' kanye 'ne-libido ephansi'. Kufanele kuqashelwe ukuthi amadoda awabuzwanga ngokusebenza kwawo kwe-erectile ngaphandle kocansi. Lokhu, uma yonke imisebenzi yawo yocansi yayihilela ukushaya indlwabu ku-porn, hhayi ucansi nomlingani, abaningi bangase bangazi ukuthi babene-ED ebangelwe yi-porn. (Ngenxa yezizathu ezaziwa nguye kuphela, uPrause ucaphuna leli phepha njengokuphikisana nokuba khona kokungasebenzi kahle kocansi okubangelwa yi-porn.)

I-PAPER #2: Ukudumisa & Pfaus, 2015.

Ngihlinzeka ngokuhlaziywa okusemthethweni nguRichard Isenberg, MD kanye nokuhlaziywa okubanzi kakhulu, kulandelwa ukuphawula kwami ​​nezingcaphuno ezivela ephepheni elibhalwe odokotela base-US Navy:

• Emaphephandabeni afana nephepha: Incwadi eya kumhleli kaRichard A. Isenberg MD (2015)
• I-extensive lay critique: Akukho Okunye Okufakwe KuSifundo Esibucayi: Izihloko Zentsha 'ED Kushiya Okungaqondakali (2015)

Iqiniso ngemuva kwePrause & Pfaus 2015: Lokhu kwakungeyona ucwaningo lwamadoda ane-ED. Kwakungeyona nhlobo ucwaningo. Esikhundleni salokho, uPrause wathi uqoqe idatha ezifundweni zakhe ezine zangaphambilini, okungekho noyedwa kuzo owayekhuluma ngokungasebenzi kahle kwe-erectile. Kuyaphazamisa ukuthi leli phepha likaNicole Prause noJim Pfaus lidlule ekubuyekezweni kontanga njengoba idatha ephepheni labo ingahambisani nedatha ezifundweni ezine eziyisisekelo lapho iphepha lithi lisekelwe khona. Ukungafani akuzona izikhala ezincane, kodwa imigodi evulekile engenakuvalwa. Ngaphezu kwalokho, leli phepha lenze izimangalo eziningana ezazingamanga noma ezingasekelwa yidatha yalo.

Siqala ngezinsolo ezingamanga ezenziwe nguNicole Prause noJim Pfaus. Izihloko eziningi zezintatheli mayelana nalolu cwaningo zithi ukusetshenziswa kocansi kuholele ekuvuthweni okungcono , kodwa akusikho lokho okutholwe yiphephandaba. Ezingxoxweni eziqoshiwe, bobabili uNicole Prause noJim Pfaus bathi ngamanga ukuthi balinganise ukuvunywa kwenduku elebhu, nokuthi amadoda asebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ayenokuvunywa okungcono. Engxoxweni ye -TV kaJim Pfaus uPfaus uthi:

"Sibheke ukuhlangana kwamakhono abo okuthola ukwakhiwa ebhodini."

"Sithole ukuhlangana kwe-liner nenani le-porn abayibuka ekhaya, futhi ama-latency okuthi ngokwesibonelo bathola ukwakhiwa ashesha."

Kule ngxoxo yomsakazo uNicole Prause wathi ukumiswa kwenduku kulinganiswa elabhorethri. Isisho esiqondile esivela ohlelweni:

"Lapho abantu bebuka inkanuko ekhaya banezimpendulo ezinamandla ze-erectile ebhodini, hhayi ezincishisiwe."

Kodwa leli phepha alizange lihlole ikhwalithi yokuma kwendoda elebhu noma "isivinini sokuma kwendoda." Leli phepha lathi licele amadoda ukuthi alinganise "ukuvuka" kwawo ngemva kokubuka izithombe zobulili ezingcolile isikhashana (futhi akucaci ngisho nasemaphepha angaphansi ukuthi lo mbiko olula wabuzwa kuzo zonke izihloko). Kunoma ikuphi, isiqephu sephepha ngokwalo savuma ukuthi:

"Akukho datha yokuphendula izitho zangasese ezifakiwe ukuxhasa okwenziwe ngabesilisa."

Ngamanye amazwi, akukho okukhethwa kwangempela okuvivinywe noma okulinganiselwe kulabhu!

Esimangalweni sesibili esingasekelwa, umbhali oholayo uNicole Prause ubhale ku-Twitter izikhathi eziningana mayelana nocwaningo, wazisa umhlaba ukuthi kuhileleke abantu abangu-280, nokuthi “abanazo izinkinga ekhaya.” Kodwa-ke, izifundo ezine eziyisisekelo zaziqukethe abantu besilisa abangu-234 kuphela, ngakho-ke “u-280” usekude kakhulu.

Isimangalo sesithathu esingasekelwa: Incwadi kaDkt. Isenberg eya kuMhleli (exhunywe ngenhla), ephakamise ukukhathazeka okuningi okubalulekile okugqamisa amaphutha ephepheni le-Prause & Pfaus, yazibuza ukuthi kungenzeka kanjani ukuthi i-Prause & Pfaus 2015 iqhathanise amazinga ahlukene okuvusa inkanuko yabantu abahlukene lapho izinhlobo ezintathu ezahlukene zezisusa zocansi zisetshenziswe ezifundweni ezine eziyisisekelo. Izifundo ezimbili zisebenzise ifilimu yemizuzu emi-3, isifundo esisodwa sisebenzise ifilimu yemizuzwana engama-20, kanti esinye isifundo sisebenzise izithombe ezinganyakazi. Kuqinisekisiwe ukuthi amafilimu avusa inkanuko kakhulu kunezithombe , ngakho-ke akukho thimba locwaningo elisemthethweni elingahlanganisa lezi zihloko ndawonye ukuze lenze izimangalo mayelana nezimpendulo zazo. Okushaqisayo ukuthi ephepheni labo i-Prause & Pfaus bathi ngokungangabazeki zonke izifundo ezine zisebenzise amafilimu ocansi:

"I-VSS eyethulwa kulezi zifundo yilawo wonke amafilimu."

Lesi sitatimende singamanga, njengoba kuvezwe ngokucacile ezifundweni eziyisisekelo zikaPrause. Lesi yisizathu sokuqala sokuthi iPrause & Pfaus bangakwazi ukuthi iphepha labo lihlolwe "ukuvusa inkanuko." Kufanele usebenzise umfutho ofanayo esifundweni ngasinye ukuqhathanisa zonke izifundo.

Isimangalo sesine esingasekelwa: UDkt. Isenberg uphinde wabuza ukuthi i-Prause & Pfaus 2015 ingaqhathanisa kanjani amazinga okuvuka kwabantu abahlukene lapho isifundo esisodwa kuphela kwezine eziyisisekelo sisebenzisa isikali esingu-1 kuya ku-9. Esinye sasebenzisa isikali esingu-0 kuya ku-7, esinye sasebenzisa isikali esingu-1 kuya ku-7, kanti esinye isifundo asizange sibike izilinganiso zokuvuka kwabantu ngokocansi. Nalapha futhi i-Prause & Pfaus ithi ngendlela engachazeki:

"Amadoda abuzwa ukuthi akhombise izinga" lokuvusa ngocansi "kusukela ku-1" hhayi nakancane "kuya ku-9" ngokweqile. "

Lesi sitatimende, naso, singamanga, njengoba kukhombisa amaphepha ayisisekelo. Lesi yisizathu sesibili sokuthi kungani iPrause & Pfaus bengakwazi ukuthi iphepha labo lihlolwe izilinganiso "zokuvusa" emadodeni. Ucwaningo kumele lusebenzise isilinganiso sokulinganisa esifanayo esifundweni ngasinye ukuqhathanisa imiphumela yezifundo. Ngokufingqa, zonke izihloko ezenziwa nguPrause mayelana nokusetshenziswa kocansi zithuthukisa ukuvuswa noma ukuvuswa, noma yini enye, akunasidingo.

I-Prause & Pfaus 2015 iphinde yathi ayitholanga ubudlelwano phakathi kwamaphuzu okusebenza kwe-erectile kanye nenani lezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ezibukiwe ngenyanga edlule. Njengoba uDkt. Isenberg esho:

Okuphazamisayo nakakhulu ukukhipha okuphelele kokuthola izibalo zomphumela wokusebenza we-erectile. Ayikho imiphumela yezibalo ezinikeziwe. Esikhundleni salokho abalobi bacela umfundi ukuba akholelwe nje isitatimende esingaqinisekisiwe sokuthi akukho buhlobo phakathi kwamahora wezithombe zobulili ezingcolile obubhekwe nomsebenzi we-erectile. Njengoba kunikezwe ukuphikisa okubhaliwe okubambisana ukuthi umsebenzi we-erectile nomlingani ungathuthukiswa ngokubuka izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ukuthi ukuhlaziywa kwamanani okuhlaziywa kungabikho okwesabekayo kakhulu.

Empendulweni ye-Prause & Pfaus ekugxekweni kukaDkt. Isenberg, ababhali baphinde bahluleka ukunikeza noma yiluphi ulwazi lokusekela "isitatimende sabo esingenasisekelo." Njengoba lokhu kuhlaziya kubhala , impendulo ye-Prause & Pfaus ayigcini nje ngokugwema ukukhathazeka okusemthethweni kukaDkt. Isenberg, iqukethe ukuhlanekezela okusha okusha kanye nezitatimende eziningana ezingamanga ngokusobala. Okokugcina, isibuyekezo sezincwadi engizibhalile nodokotela abangu-7 baseNavy siphawule ku- Prause & Pfaus 2015:

Ukubuyekezwa kwethu kufake namaphepha amabili ka-2015 athi ukusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ku-inthanethi akuhlobene nobunzima obukhulayo bobulili kwabesilisa abasebasha. Kodwa-ke, izimangalo ezinjalo zibonakala zisheshe zifike lapho kuhlolisiswa la maphepha kanye nokugxekwa okusemthethweni okuhlobene. Iphepha lokuqala liqukethe ukuqonda okuwusizo mayelana nendima engaba khona yokulungiswa kobulili ku-ED yentsha [ 50 ]. Kodwa-ke, le ncwadi igxekwe ngokungafani okuhlukahlukene, ukushiywa kanye namaphutha ezindlela. Isibonelo, ayinikezi miphumela yezibalo zesilinganiso somphumela womsebenzi we-erectile maqondana nokusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ku-inthanethi. Ngaphezu kwalokho, njengoba udokotela ocwaningayo ekhombisile ekugxekweni okusemthethweni kwephepha, abalobi bephepha, "abazange banikeze umfundi ulwazi olwanele mayelana nenani labantu abafundwe noma ukuhlaziywa kwezibalo ukuze baqinisekise isiphetho sabo" [ 51 ]. Ngaphezu kwalokho, abacwaningi baphenye amahora ambalwa kuphela okusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ku-inthanethi ngenyanga edlule. Kodwa izifundo mayelana nokulutha kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ku-inthanethi zithole ukuthi ukushintshashintsha kwamahora okusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ku-inthanethi kuphela akuhlobene kakhulu "nezinkinga empilweni yansuku zonke", amaphuzu ku-SAST-R (Sexual Addiction Screening Test), kanye namaphuzu ku-IATsex (ithuluzi elihlola ukulutha kwezenzo zobulili eziku-inthanethi) [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Isibikezeli esingcono yizilinganiso zothando ngokobulili ezizimele ngenkathi ubuka izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ku-inthanethi (ukusabela kwe-cue), okuhlobene okuqinisekisiwe kokuziphatha okuluthayo kuzo zonke izinhlobo zokulutha [ 52 , 53 , 54 ]. Kukhona nobufakazi obandayo bokuthi isikhathi esichithwa emidlalweni yevidiyo ye-inthanethi asibikezeli ukuziphatha okuluthayo. "Ukulutha kungahlolwa kahle kuphela uma izisusa, imiphumela kanye nezici zomongo wokuziphatha nakho kuyingxenye yokuhlola" [ 57 ]. Amanye amaqembu amathathu ocwaningo, esebenzisa izindlela ezahlukene "zobungqingili" (ngaphandle kwamahora okusebenzisa), akuhlobanise kakhulu nobunzima bobulili [ 15 , 30 , 31 ]. Uma sibheka ndawonye, ​​lolu cwaningo lusikisela ukuthi esikhundleni sokumane "kusetshenziswe amahora amaningi", iziguquguquko eziningi zibaluleke kakhulu ekuhlolweni kokulutha/ukuxhashazwa kocansi kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile, futhi kungenzeka ukuthi zibaluleke kakhulu ekuhloleni ukungasebenzi kahle kocansi okuhlobene nezithombe zobulili ezingcolile.

Lokhu kubuyekezwa kuphinde kwaqokomisa ubuthakathaka ekuxhumaniseni "amahora wokusetshenziswa wamanje" kuphela ukubikezela ukungasebenzi kobulili okubangelwa ucansi. Inani le-porn elibukwayo njengamanje lingenye yezinto eziguquguqukayo eziningi ezibandakanyeka ekwakhiweni kwe-ED eyenziwe ngocansi. Lokhu kungafaka:

1. Ukulinganiswa kokushaya indlwabu ekuziphatheni okubi kobulili nokushaya indlwabu ngaphandle kwe-porn
2. Ukulinganiswa kobulili nomuntu ngokushaya indlwabu ku-porn
3. Izikhala phakathi kobulili obuhlukanisiwe (lapho umuntu encika kuphela ku-porn)
4. Virgin noma cha
5. Inani lamahora wokusetshenziswa
6. Iminyaka yokusetshenziswa
7. Ubudala buqala ukusebenzisa i-porn ngokuzithandela
8. Ukunyuka kwezihlobo ezintsha
9. Ukuthuthukiswa kwezintambo ezithinta izithombe ezingcolile zobulili ezingcolile (kusukela ekukhuphukeni kuya kohlobo olusha lwezocansi)
10. Izinga lentando yeningi ngeseshini (okusho amavidiyo wokuhlanganisa, amathebhu amaningi)
11. Ubuchopho obuhlobene nomlutha bushintsha noma cha
12. Ubukhona bobulili obucansi / ukubheja kocansi

Indlela engcono yokucwaninga ngalesi simo, ukususa ukuguquguquka kokusetshenziswa kocansi lwe-inthanethi nokubona umphumela, okwenziwe ezifundweni zamacala lapho amadoda asusa khona ukusetshenziswa kocansi lwe-inthanethi futhi aphulukiswa. Ucwaningo olunjalo lwembula imbangela esikhundleni sokuxhumana okungaqondakali okuvulekele ekuchazeni okuphikisanayo. Isayithi lami libhale amadoda ayizinkulungwane ezimbalwa asusa ucansi futhi alulama ekuhluphekeni okungapheli kocansi.

I-PAPER #3: I-Landripet ne-Štulhofer, 2015.

I-Landripet & Štulhofer, u-2015 waqokwa njengo-"ukuxhumana okufushane" yiphephabhuku elalilishicilele, futhi ababhali ababili bakhetha idatha ethile ababezokwabelana ngayo, ngenkathi beshiya eminye imininingwane efanele (kamuva). Njengoba kunjalo nge -Prause & Pfaus , iphephabhuku kamuva lashicilela ukugxekwa kwe- Landripet & Štulhofer : Amazwana ku: Ingabe Ukusetshenziswa Kwezithombe Zobulili Ezingcolile Kuhlobene Nobunzima Bocansi Nokungasebenzi Kahle Kwabesilisa Abancane Abangabobulili Obufanayo ? nguGert Martin Hald, PhD

Ngokuphathelene nesimangalo sokuthi uLandripet noŠtulhofer , ngo-2015 abatholanga ubudlelwano phakathi kokusetshenziswa kocansi nezinkinga zocansi. Lokhu akulona iqiniso, njengoba kubhaliwe kokubili kulokhu kugxekwa kwe-YBOP kanye nokubuyekezwa kwale mibhalo . Ngaphezu kwalokho, iphepha likaLandripet noŠtulhofer alizange lihlanganise izinto ezintathu ezibalulekile abazethule engqungqutheleni yaseYurophu (ngaphezulu ngezansi). Ake siqale ngesigaba sokuqala kwezintathu ephepheni lethu esibhekisele kuLandripet noŠtulhofer , ngo-2015:

Iphepha lesibili libike ukuhlangana okuncane phakathi kokusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-inthanethi ngonyaka odlule kanye namazinga e-ED kwabesilisa abahlanganyela ucansi abavela eNorway, ePortugal naseCroatia [ 6 ]. Laba babhali, ngokungafani nalabo bephepha elidlule, bayavuma ukwanda okuphezulu kwe-ED kwabesilisa abaneminyaka engu-40 nangaphansi, futhi empeleni bathole i-ED kanye namazinga aphansi esifiso sobulili aphezulu njengo-31% no-37%, ngokulandelana. Ngokuphambene nalokho, ucwaningo lwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-inthanethi olusakazwa ngaphambi kokusakaza olwenziwe ngo-2004 ngomunye wababhali bephepha lubike amazinga e-ED angu-5.8% kuphela kwabesilisa abaneminyaka engu-35-39 [ 58 ]. Kodwa-ke, ngokusekelwe ekuqhathanisweni kwezibalo, ababhali baphetha ngokuthi ukusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-inthanethi akubonakali kuyisici esibalulekile sengozi ye-ED yentsha. Lokho kubonakala kuyiqiniso kakhulu, njengoba amadoda asePortugal abawahlolile abike amazinga aphansi kakhulu okungasebenzi kahle kocansi uma kuqhathaniswa namaNorway namaCroatia, kanti amaPutukezi angu-40% kuphela abike ukuthi asebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-inthanethi "kusukela izikhathi eziningana ngesonto kuya kwansuku zonke", uma kuqhathaniswa namaNorway, angu-57%, kanye namaCroatia, angu-59%. Leli phepha ligxekwe ngokusemthethweni ngokwehluleka ukusebenzisa amamodeli aphelele akwazi ukuhlanganisa ubudlelwano obuqondile nobungaqondile phakathi kwezinto eziguquguqukayo ezaziwa noma ezicatshangelwa ukuthi zisemsebenzini [ 59 ]. Ngeshwa, ephepheni elihlobene nesifiso sobulili esiphansi esiyinkinga esihilela abaningi babahlanganyeli bocwaningo olufanayo abavela ePortugal, eCroatia naseNorway, amadoda abuzwe ukuthi yiziphi izici eziningi abakholelwa ukuthi zinegalelo ekuntuleni kwabo intshisekelo yobulili. Phakathi kwezinye izici, cishe u-11%–22% bakhethe ukuthi “Ngisebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile kakhulu” kanti u-16%–26% bakhethe ukuthi “Ngishaya indlwabu kaningi kakhulu” [ 60 ]

Njengoba mina nababhali bami, odokotela beNavy, sichaze, leli phepha lithole ukuhlobana okubaluleke kakhulu: Amaphesenti angu-40 kuphela amadoda asePutukezi ayesebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile “njalo,” kuyilapho amaphesenti angu-60 abantu baseNorway babesebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile “njalo.” Amadoda asePutukezi ayenokukhubazeka okuncane kakhulu kocansi kunabaseNorway. Ngokuphathelene nezihloko zaseCroat, uLandripet noŠtulhofer , 2015 bayavuma ubudlelwano obubalulekile phakathi kokusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile njalo kanye ne-ED, kodwa bathi ubukhulu bomphumela babuncane. Kodwa-ke, lesi simangalo singase sidukise ngokusho kodokotela onguchwepheshe wezibalo futhi obhale izifundo eziningi:

Ihlaziywe ngendlela ehlukile (i-Chi squared),… ukusetshenziswa okulingene (kuqhathaniswa nokusetshenziswa okungajwayelekile) kukhuphule izingqinamba (amathuba) okuba ne-ED cishe ngama-50% kulaba bantu baseCroatia. Lokho kuzwakala kunengqondo kimi, yize kunelukuluku lokuthi lokho okutholakele kukhonjwe kuphela phakathi kwamaCroats.

Ngaphezu kwalokho, i-Landripet & Štulhofer 2015 ayishiyanga ukuhlobana okuthathu okubalulekile, okwavezwa ngomunye wababhali engqungqutheleni yaseYurophu . Ubike ukuhlobana okuphawulekayo phakathi kokungasebenzi kahle kwe-erectile kanye "nokuthanda izinhlobo ezithile zobulili ezingcolile":

Ukubika ukukhetha izinhlobo ezithile zobulili ezingcolile [sic] kuhlotshaniswa kakhulu nokungasebenzi kahle kobulili kwabesilisa (kodwa hhayi okuhambisana nokuphuma kocansi noma okuhlobene nesifiso).

Kuyacaca ukuthi uLandripet noŠtulhofer bakhethe ukungawufaki lo mqondo obalulekile phakathi kokungasebenzi kahle kwe-erectile kanye nezintandokazi zezinhlobo ezithile ze-porn ephepheni labo. Kuvamile kakhulu ukuthi abasebenzisi be-porn bakhuphukele ezinhlotsheni (noma ezifihlwe) ezingahambisani nokuthanda kwabo kokuqala kocansi, futhi babhekane ne-ED lapho lezi zintandokazi ze-porn ezihambisanayo zingahambisani nokuhlangana kwangempela kocansi. Njengoba sishilo ngenhla, kubaluleke kakhulu ukuhlola iziguquguquko eziningi ezihlobene nokusetshenziswa kwe-porn - hhayi amahora nje enyangeni edlule noma imvamisa ngonyaka odlule.

Ukutholwa kwesibili okubalulekile okushiywe yi- Landripet & Štulhofer ngo-2015 kuhilela abesifazane ababambe iqhaza:

Ukusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile okwandisiwe kwakuhlobene kancane kodwa ngokuphawulekayo nokuncipha kwentshisekelo yocansi oluhlanganyelwe kanye nokungasebenzi kahle kocansi okuvame kakhulu phakathi kwabesifazane.

Ubudlelwano obukhulu phakathi kokusetshenziswa kakhulu kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile kanye nokwehla kwesifiso sobulili kanye nokungasebenzi kahle kocansi kubonakala kubaluleke kakhulu. Kungani i-Landripet & Štulhofer 2015 ingazange ibike ukuthi bathole ubudlelwano obukhulu phakathi kokusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile kanye nokungasebenzi kahle kocansi kwabesifazane, kanye nabambalwa kwabesilisa? Futhi kungani lokhu okutholakele kungabikwanga kunoma yiziphi izifundo eziningi zika-Štulhofer ezivela kulezi zinhlobo zedatha ezifanayo? Amaqembu akhe abonakala eshesha kakhulu ukushicilela idatha abathi iphika i-ED ebangelwa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile, kodwa yephuza kakhulu ukwazisa abasebenzisi ngemiphumela emibi yocansi yokusebenzisa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile.

Ekugcineni, ukuphawula okusemthethweni komcwaningi wezithombe zocansi waseDenmark uGert Martin Hald kuveze isidingo sokuhlola iziguquguquko eziningi (abalamuli, abaqondisi) kunokuvama nje ngesonto ezinyangeni eziyi-12 ezedlule:

Ukutadisha akubheki namakhomitha angakhona noma abaxhumanisi bobudlelwane abafundela noma abakwazi ukucacisa ukuthi yini. Ngokuqhubekayo, ocwaningweni lwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile, kunikezwa ukunakwa ezithombeni ezingathonya ubukhulu noma isiqondiso sobudlelwano obufundwayo (okungukuthi, omengameli) kanye nezindlela ezingase zenzeke ngayo (ie abaxhumanisi). Ucwaningo lwekusasa ekusetshenzisweni kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile kanye nobunzima bocansi lungase futhi buzuze ekufakweni kwalokhu kugxila.

Iphuzu elibalulekile: Zonke izimo zezokwelapha eziyinkimbinkimbi zihilela izici eziningi, okumele zihlukaniswe ngaphambi kokuba izimemezelo ezifinyelela kude kwabezindaba zifaneleke. Isitatimende sikaLandripet noŠtulhofer sokuthi, “ Izithombe zobulili ezingcolile azibonakali ziyisici esibalulekile sengozi yesifiso sabesilisa abasebasha, ubunzima bokushada, noma ubunzima bokushada ” sidlulela kakhulu, ngoba sizishaya indiva zonke ezinye izinto ezingenzeka ezihlobene nokusetshenziswa kocansi ezingase zibangele izinkinga zokusebenza kocansi kubasebenzisi, okuhlanganisa nokwenyukela ezinhlotsheni ezithile, abazithole, kodwa ezishiyiwe “ku-Brief Communication.” Izigaba 2 no-3 engxoxweni yethu kaLandripet noŠtulhofer , 2015 :

Nakulokhu, izifundo zokungenelela zizobe zifundisa kakhulu. Kodwa-ke, ngokuphathelene nezifundo zokulungiswa, kungenzeka ukuthi isisombululo esiyinkimbinkimbi sezinto eziguqukayo kufanele siphenywe ukuze sikwazi ukucacisa izici ezingozini ezisebenzayo ezinkingeni zobulili ezincane ezingakaze zibe khona. Okokuqala, kungenzeka ukuthi isifiso sobulili esincane, ubunzima bokungena ngezinkinga kanye nezinkinga zokusebenzisana ne-erectile ziyingxenye yemiphumela efanayo ehlobene nezithombe zobulili ezingcolile e-Inthanethi, nokuthi zonke lezi zinkinga kufanele zihlangane lapho kucwaninga ukusebenzisana okukhanyayo ne-pornography e-intanethi esebenzisayo.

Okwesibili, nakuba kungaqondakali kahle ukuthi iyiphi inhlanganisela yezici ezingase zibheke ngokucacile ngezinkinga ezinjalo, iziphambano ezithembisayo zokuphenya ngokuhambisana nemvamisa yezithombe zobulili ezingcolile zo-Inthanethi zingafaka phakathi (i-1) iminyaka yezithombe zobulili ezingcolile-ezisizwa ngokuhambisana nokushaya indlwabu; (2) isilinganiso se-ejaculations nomlingani ukuze ku-ejaculations ne-pornography ye-intanethi; (I-3) ukutholakala kobulili obungcolile kwi-inthanethi / ubulili obufanayo; (4) inani leminyaka yokusakaza izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-Inthanethi zisebenzisa; (I-5) ngakuphi ukuguga okujwayelekile ukusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-Inthanethi kwaqala nokuthi ngabe kuqale ngaphambi kokukhulelwa; (6) umkhuba wokukhula kwezithombe ezingcolile zobulili ze-Inthanethi zisebenzisa; (7) ukuqhubekela phambili kwezinye izinhlobo ezingcolile zobulili ezingcolile ze-intanethi, njalonjalo.

Ukwanda kwe-500% - 1000% ku-ED yentsha kusukela ngo-2010 akunakuchazwa kude nezici ezijwayelekile

Izifundo ezihlola ubulili besilisa abasebasha kusukela ngo-2010 zibika amazinga omlando okungasebenzi kahle kocansi kanye namazinga ashaqisayo obhubhane olusha: isifiso esiphansi sobulili (socansi oluhlanganyelwe). Kubhalwe kulesi sihloko esivamile kanye nasekubuyekezweni kwethu Ingabe Izithombe Zobulili Ezingcolile Ze-inthanethi Zibangela Ukungasebenzi Kahle Kocansi? Isibuyekezo Ngemibiko Yezokwelapha (2016).

Ngaphambi kokuvela kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile zokusakaza mahhala (2006), izifundo ezihlanganisa izingxenye kanye nokuhlaziywa kwe-meta kubike njalo amazinga okungasebenzi kahle kwe-erectile angama-2-5% kwabesilisa abangaphansi kweminyaka engama-40. Amazinga okungasebenzi kahle kwe-Erectile ezifundweni eziyi-10 ezishicilelwe kusukela ngo-2010 asukela ku-14% kuya ku-35%, kuyilapho amazinga e-libido ephansi (ubungqingili) asukela ku-16% kuya ku-37%. Ezinye izifundo zibandakanya intsha nabesilisa abaneminyaka engama-25 nangaphansi, kanti ezinye izifundo zihlanganisa amadoda angaphansi kweminyaka engama-40. Esinye sezibonelo zakamuva ezimangalisayo (2018) ucwaningo lwe-ED kubadlali bezithombe zobulili ezingcolile. Labo abangaphansi kweminyaka engama-30 babenezinga le-ED eliphindwe kabili kunalabo abadala (ababenobulili obuhlukile ngaphandle kokufinyelela izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-inthanethi ezisheshayo ngesikhathi sobusha). Bheka Ukungasebenzi Kahle Kwe-Erectile Phakathi Kwababungazi Abadala Besilisa: Ucwaningo.

Ngamafuphi kube nokwenyuka okungu-500%-1000% kwamazinga e-ED yentsha eminyakeni eyi-10 edlule. Yikuphi ukushintshashintsha okushintshile eminyakeni eyi-15 edlule okungaba imbangela yalokhu kunyuka okukhulu? Ngaphambi kokuthi ngokuqiniseka bathi abathengi bezithombe zobulili ezingcolile banamuhla abanalutho abakhathazeka ngalo ngokusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili ezingcolile ze-inthanethi, abacwaningi kusadingeka bacabangele ukwanda kwamuva nje kwe-ED yentsha kanye nesifiso sobulili esiphansi , izifundo eziningi ezixhumanisa ukusetshenziswa kwezithombe zobulili nenkinga yocansi , izinkulungwane zemibiko yomuntu siqu kanye nemibiko yodokotela yamadoda ephulukisa i-ED ngokuqeda ukushintshashintsha okukodwa: izithombe zobulili ezingcolile.

Impilo Yamadoda ucaphuna i-Ian Kerner, kodwa esikhathini esedlule uKerner wathi i-porno ibangela izinkinga zobulili!

Esihlokweni se -Men's Health uKerner (ongumkhulumeli we-AASECT) uphenduka ukuze agweme ukusola izithombe zobulili ezingcolile, ethi ukushaya indlwabu kubangela i-ED engapheli kwabesilisa abasebasha abanempilo:

Nakuba kungase kungabi khona ukuxhumana okuqondile phakathi kokubukwa kwe-porn ne-erectile, kukhona okungaqondakali ukuthi kwezinye izimo ukushaya indlwabu kungaholela ezindabeni zokuvuselela. "Esikhathini sami sokutholwa kwengqondo angitholi i-porn ibe yimbangela eqondile ye-[erectile disorder, ejaculation ngaphambi kwesikhathi, futhi i-ejaculation ingakabiphi]" kuchaza u-Ian Kerner, Ph.D. kanye ne-psychotherapist enelayisensi kanye nomeluleki wezocansi.

Qaphela ukuthi uKerner akashongo lutho, ngoba akekho udokotela wezifo zomchamo ongavumelana nesimangalo sakhe esingasekelwa sokuthi ukushaya indlwabu kubangela i-ED engapheli emadodeni asemasha. UKerner, uPrause, noDavid Ley bonke bahlele ukudukisa umphakathi kude nezithombe zobulili ezingcolile njengembangela yangempela. I-YBOP ibhale ngaleli qhinga lokubhema nezibuko lapha: Odokotela bezocansi bayaphika i-ED ebangelwa izithombe zobulili ezingcolile ngokuthi ukushaya indlwabu kuyinkinga (2016).

Ngaphambi kokuba u-Ian Kerner abe ngusihlalo wezokuxhumana komphakathi we-AASECT, wayenombono ohlukile ngezinkinga zocansi ezibangelwa ucansi. Bheka isihloko esilandelayo sika-2013 sikaKerner, esichitha uKerner ka-2018 (Mhlawumbe ngokuba ngumkhulumeli osemthethweni we-AASECT wazizwa ephoqelekile ukulandela umugqa wenkampani .):

I-Porn Porn kakhulu kakhulu: I-SADD Effect

Ngu-Ian Kerner

Ukufinyelela okulula kwi-inthanethi ye-intanethi kanye nezinhlobo ezihlukahlukene zezinto ezintsha ezithintekayo kuye kwabathinta abafana abavamile abangazange babe nenkinga.

Njengomeluleki wezocansi kanye nomsunguli we- Good in Bed , ngibone ukwanda okukhulu kwamadoda ahlushwa yisifo esisha engisibize ngokuthi “Sexual Attention Deficit Disorder,” noma i-SADD. Futhi umthombo wale nkinga ukuchofoza nje — izithombe zobulili ezingcolile eziningi kakhulu ku-inthanethi.

Njengoba nje abantu abane-ADD bephazamiseka kalula, amadoda ane-SADD asejwayele amazinga aphezulu okubuka okusha kanye nokukhuthazwa okuvela ku-porn ye-inthanethi kangangokuthi awakwazi ukugxila ocansini lwangempela nowesifazane wangempela. Ngenxa yalokho, amadoda ane-SADD avame ukuthola kunzima ukugcina ukuma ngesikhathi socansi, noma abhekana nokuphuma kocansi okulibazisekile futhi angafinyelela esiphethweni kuphela ngokukhuthazwa ngesandla noma ngomlomo.

Bored embhedeni?

Amadoda ane-SADD avame ukuzithola enesithukuthezi noma ephelelwa yisineke ngesikhathi socansi. Angase avuke ngokomzimba futhi aqonde phezulu, kodwa awafiki ezingeni eliphezulu lokuvuka kwengqondo. Amadoda ane-SADD angase angabi naso isifiso sobulili sangempela ngoba akhathele ukushaya indlwabu . Azigijimi ngokugcwele, ngokomzimba noma ngokwengqondo.

Ngiyakholwa noma cha, ngaqala ukubona i-SADD ngezikhalazo zabesifazane abazibuza ukuthi kungani abafana babo behluleka ukuhlakulela (futhi bevame ukuzifakela) noma ngubani oqaphele ukuthi abalingani babo babonakala benqanyuliwe noma bengathandeki ngesikhathi socansi. Ngenkathi ngigubha kancane, noma ngikhuluma namadoda ngokwabo, ngabona ukuthi la madoda ayedlala ngokweqile kunokujwayelekile ngenxa yokufinyelela kwabo kalula kwi-inthanethi ye-inthanethi. Ngezinye izikhathi, babebenomzimba wokushaya indlwabu ngendlela efanayo njalo, kepha babengakaqapheli ukuthi isikhathi sabo sokuphikisa - isikhathi sokuphumula phakathi kwezikhathi zokuphumula - sanda njengoba sisekhulile.

Ungangitholi ngephutha, ngingumdlali omkhulu wokushaya indlwabu. Kuyasiza umfana aphule umusi othile futhi ufana nosuku lwe-spa lwe-30-yesibili. Kodwa ukufinyeleleka kalula kwe-porn ye-intanethi kanye nezinhlobonhlobo eziningi zezinto ezintsha ezithintekayo kuye kwabathinta abafana abavamile ababengeke babe nenkinga. Ngenxa yalokhu, la madoda avuselele ubuchopho bawo ukuze afise ukuthokozisa okusheshayo kwe-orgasm enikwe amandla ocansi. Lokhu kusho ukuthi bakhulisa lokho okukhulunywe ngabo emtholampilo njengesitayela se-idiosyncratic style: Baye bazijwayele uhlobo olunamandla lokuvuselela ngokomzimba okungalingani ngesikhathi socansi langempela. Izinga labo eliphelele lesifiso sobulili kubalingani babo liphansi, futhi badinga ukucabanga ngesikhathi sokulala ngokoqobo ukuze kugcinwe ukulungiswa okugcwele.

Ucabanga ukuthi uhlushwa yi-SADD? Nakhu okumele ukwenze…

Yini indoda ephethe i-SADD?

Okokuqala, zinike ikhefu lokushaya indlwabu . Londoloza imizwa yakho yomlingani wakho. Uma ungashadile, yehlisa imvamisa yokushaya indlwabu. Uma ushaya indlwabu, zama ukusebenzisa isandla sakho esingalawuleki. Isibonelo, uma ungumuntu ongakwesokudla, zithinte ngesandla sakho sobunxele. Ngeke ukwazi ukusebenzisa amazinga afanayo okuqina ngokomzimba njengoba ungakwenza ngesandla sakho esilawulayo, ngakho ngeke uzizwe ucindezelekile ngokomzimba ngenxa yemizwa yocansi.

Okwesibili, yeka izithombe zobulili ezingcolile . Uma ushaya indlwabu, sebenzisa ingqondo yakho ukudala izithombe bese uzama ukukhumbula iziqephu zobulili ezilodwa. Cabanga ngakho njengomehluko phakathi kokufunda nokubuka i-TV. Sebenzisa leli thuba ukuze uphinde uxhumane nomlando wakho wezocansi kanye nekhathalogi yakho yezinkumbulo ezithandekayo.

Khulisa imizwa emisha yengqondo nomlingani wakho: Yabelana ngamaphupho bese uzama ukudlala indima. Ngaphambi kokuba nilale, zifike ezingeni lapho usufike ezingeni eliphezulu lokuvuka ngokomzimba nangokwengqondo . I-SADD akudingeki idabuke ngenxa yakho noma umlingani wakho. Suka kukhompyutha yakho uye ekamelweni lakho lokulala, bese ubuyisela ukunaka kwakho lapho kufanele khona - empilweni yakho yangempela yocansi.

UGavin Evans angase afise ukuvuselela isihloko sakhe ku- Men's Health ... kodwa angizukubamba umoya.